Your forums are infiltrated

http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=6690

Your forums are infiltrated.

I have been on several large forums latetly and the discussions are all the same. The people are talking about how the forums are infiltrated, how the quality of the conversations are not the same.

I have to agree with the forums that I have been to, the chatter on these forums, where once bright and intellegent, almost revolutionary, seem to be quite different now.

One forum that is listed as a conspiracy forum constantly makes fun of members who post conspiracies, or calls into question the mentality of anyone who would believe them. A lot of these forums were set up by intellegence agencies in the first place, and the rest that were not are so over run that they may as well have been set up my shrills. That’s how it’s working.

Hijacked threads, threads where the conversation goes off topic, nothing get’s done, you just waste your time. Good threads don’t go anywhere, no one posts to them. Or if a topic is discussed and a good point made, several posters will post in the thread till the useful or relavant point is off the main page. The people on the forums, know how to work, and control the boards, and it’s working.

I saw one forum, where they shamed the posters into shuting up about talking about a conspiracy. They made the posters feel stupid, and so the conversation almost died, till one poster pointed out what was happening.

I can tell you what use to happen on some of the organized stalking forums, where people would join, a real target would feel that they were being signled out for barbs, or a real target would afterwards realize this forum is not about activism. They would point out that it feels like something is getting done, but the forums are there to ensure that nothing is getting done, no real progress is being made, but lately it’s worst and worst, and this seems to be happening on many forums across the internet.

It’s something members of the various forums have likely noticed, but I just wanted to bring this awareness to the surface, so that it could be more readily discussed, and evaluated.

What on earth did I get myself into?

It all depends on who you ask, and how you interpret the situation. Sometimes the answer is blowing in the wind.

I had such a moment a few weeks ago on some level, and at first my only thought was how do I untangle myself, but the more I watched and waited for the punchline, the punchline never came. Where I was on some level was surprisingly where I was meant to be. It really started to work for me, and much to my complete surprise, really lifted my spirits.

Now upon realising that I was in a good place, the usual control agents have done just about everything to try to change or destroy that.

This week has been a challenge, but I am trying to find that peace and happy I knew just a few short weeks ago.

I find that when you are in the right place, you can not let specific negative elements allow you to be brought low.

I think the question of what on earth did I get myself into at times has to be answered in spirit for truth, but in flesh for accuracy, cause otherwise it’s just too easy to get the lines of communications mixed up, or cluttered with a lot of inaccurate information.

I think targets ask this question a lot, but much like the disinformation that is out there about us, some information can only be clarified by going to or getting at the source.

http://www.1brickcourt.com/files/cases/140CLIFT_58136.pdf

Brighting other observations

Brighting.

Remember how we were told that this was used for gaslighting targets at night? Well I think this might not be the case. I recently had an opportunity to be exposed to this phenomenon and I have a few observations.

I don’t get exposed to this phenomenon too much so, it’s been very difficult observe it properly and to do a proper assessment. Well recently they were circling me, I use this term, because they remind me of sharks, but they don’t really circle, so much as drive up the street and flash the high beams at you a few times.

Now in the past when I have been exposed to this, it’s been one car, I usually sneer at them and go on my way, but recently I had a few cars in a row do it, and I realised, I don’t think it’s gaslighting or it’s not just gaslighting alone.

After a few of this, I realised that they were waiting for something so I flashed them the open communications and on observation signals. (Yeah I emotionally showered after.) I don’t do use the signals too often, in early research when I was learning what they were, I used them to confirm that I was correct, and then most times they are put away, till I have to be around the informants for long periods of time, or if I have to do field testing to confirm things or test things out.

Anyways, after this, the circling stopped. So think about it. During the day, the foot patrols signal to the people in the cars, right, well at night it’s dark, so you are a snitch in your car, you see someone walking, you want to know if it’s one of yours, so you flash the beams at them, and if they are, they should signal back the appropriate signals right?

Think about those old spy movies, and they flash the highbeams, and then the person responses by lighting a cigarette or something.

Now I have not had any real time to field test this, and they don’t use brighting on me enough, so it could be awhile before I get to confirm this, but if any other targets are out there and they get this, then you might want to field test it. It might help give you a one up.

So that would make brighting a little bit more important than once thought. It’s been close to three years and it never really occurred to me, that’s why we need to keep thinking outside of the box, and again I have not had time to properly field test this, but I have reason to believe the hypothesis is correct.

The other concept that I want to touch on is one that I came across in Control Factor, Matrix, and I think the movie They Live.

It’s this concept that anyone can be an agent, just about anyone can be used. I came across it again in control factor, but it just also reminded me of the other two movies.

In control factor, what they can do is they can use a beam to almost like possess someone else and speak and act through that person, you see the same thing in the Matrix with them possessing people and taking them over, and in they live you never knew who might be one of them without your real world glasses on. It’s just an interesting concept and it’s also interesting because you see this theme in so many movies, and then we have a society where large portions are informants. Plus there is concept that some are in constant contact, with others who they are getting orders from and instructions. It’s interesting the movies that are out there.

Set Up’s.

Online recently other than falsely labeling my site, there seems to be an effort by some to paint me as a person who is bashing others and creating infighting. If bashing others means calling it like it is, and telling the truth about what is ongoing, then so be it, but the same standards they use for others, they better use for themselves. Second with infighting. Guess what, the reason I believe in a leaderless resistance is because for the most part it avoids that. The way this system works is that each sector does their own thing, it’s just like how each fusion center does it’s own thing, well if we want to be effective, each mini resistance to a degree has to do it’s own thing, no two can be or should be exactly alike, and that makes it harder to eliminate everyone. The same tactics they use, we should use similar. I remember in the movie V and V the final battle each city had it’s own chapter of the resistance.

Therefore since I tend to stay separate for the most part, unless someone does something deliberate like attacking my website, with some phony witch hunt, then I don’t have a problem with anyone, but if you expect to attack me or mine without getting it back, or getting called on it, it’s not going to happen.

Offline.

They seem to be really trying to squeeze my resources. Not just me, but those around me and anyone that might be of aid or assistance to me. I remember when Mark M. Rich on his old site talked about this. He had a couple of sisters and they all sold their homes and moved into smaller places, places that he would not be able to stay at if he should become homeless.

I remember that they made Rachel homeless, and another target was homeless when they further took his resources away, arrested him, and turned him into an informant. See that’s why I try to not judge people, because I remember some of the stuff that I have read.

Also the reason some of stay alive this long, I like to think it’s because we are a bit clever, but in reality it might just be because they can keep us on the borders. See people like Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan, they had means, and Jeremy was loyal to her. You could not get them both by making them poor, unemployed whatever, so Theresa was found dead one day, apparently a suicide, and Jeremy shortly after because he was so upset about her suicide. I have always believe these were not suicides, but proving it is another story.

For those who don’t know the story here is a link.
https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/category/jeremy-blake/

I should point out that Theresa on her blog if I recall correctly had her FOIA and it showed that she had been investigated. I would have to double check this, but I think that is correct.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1201450715

Also Ruth Goodman seems to have been someone ok, in that she owned her own home, and she had gotten past the psychological attacks when they had her arrested, implanted her in some way, and that’s when the audio harassment started. She died shortly after that, supposedly under mysterious circumstances.

The closest I ever came to know more about Ruth, was finding one of her postings on a forum, but the time I went to find out more information about her, I found out that she was already dead, but her story moved me, and I have remembered it.

I think the reason they were taken out is that the state did not readily have ways to make them vulnerable, and wanted to find other ways to deal with them, and thus they did.

This is a path that no one should have to travel alone, and yet in some ways we might be safer if we do. I would remind people about some of my experiences on some of these forums, and some of the tactics that disinfo agents and informants use.

Disinformation

Also offline they seem to be trying for mini setup’s, little things that you might not think of, but things that might get you in trouble. I have always been law abiding, and continue to be, but that does not mean they are not testing the waters to see if they can find a weak spot or a way in, trust no one, seems to be the key. It’s pretty horrible, how they own people once they do set them up. I have witnessed this close up, seen people that I use to know, and they are shells, it’s like they own their souls or try to, whatever they do, it’s sick, and I would say it’s against God, because what they do, contributes to the darkness of this world, and it’s not in favor of the light what they do. All good people, must stand against this.

Rachel Hoffman is a good example of how they can make a good kid turn desperate. She was so desperate to have her own charges dropped that she was willing to first try to set up one of her friends, and then she was willing to do a drug buy, to try to get her records dropped and get the hell out of dodge, but she lost her life doing this, and the same way they can make someone like Rachel Hoffman desperate, is the same way they work on other people, little by little. There is something truly wrong with these people.

Rachel Hoffman. Disturbing thoughts

Anyways just to bear witness for myself again, I am anti drugs, never dabbled in anything illegal that I am aware of, don’t plan to.

Again I would remind people the material is there, use it, while it’s still available. Back it up, post it in various places, etc. I have seen a lot in just the last three years, and pray constantly, I think it’s one of the only ways we can hold back the darkness, for any length of time.

Brighting and other observations

Brighting.

Remember how we were told that this was used for gaslighting targets at night? Well I think this might not be the case. I recently had an opportunity to be exposed to this phenomenon and I have a few observations.

I don’t get exposed to this phenomenon too much so, it’s been very difficult observe it properly and to do a proper assessment. Well recently they were circling me, I use this term, because they remind me of sharks, but they don’t really circle, so much as drive up the street and flash the high beams at you a few times.

Now in the past when I have been exposed to this, it’s been one car, I usually sneer at them and go on my way, but recently I had a few cars in a row do it, and I realised, I don’t think it’s gaslighting or it’s not just gaslighting alone.

After a few of this, I realised that they were waiting for something so I flashed them the open communications and on observation signals. (Yeah I emotionally showered after.) I don’t do use the signals too often, in early research when I was learning what they were, I used them to confirm that I was correct, and then most times they are put away, till I have to be around the informants for long periods of time, or if I have to do field testing to confirm things or test things out.

Anyways, after this, the circling stopped. So think about it. During the day, the foot patrols signal to the people in the cars, right, well at night it’s dark, so you are a snitch in your car, you see someone walking, you want to know if it’s one of yours, so you flash the beams at them, and if they are, they should signal back the appropriate signals right?

Think about those old spy movies, and they flash the highbeams, and then the person responses by lighting a cigarette or something.

Now I have not had any real time to field test this, and they don’t use brighting on me enough, so it could be awhile before I get to confirm this, but if any other targets are out there and they get this, then you might want to field test it. It might help give you a one up.

So that would make brighting a little bit more important than once thought. It’s been close to three years and it never really occurred to me, that’s why we need to keep thinking outside of the box, and again I have not had time to properly field test this, but I have reason to believe the hypothesis is correct.

The other concept that I want to touch on is one that I came across in Control Factor, Matrix, and I think the movie They Live.

It’s this concept that anyone can be an agent, just about anyone can be used. I came across it again in control factor, but it just also reminded me of the other two movies.

In control factor, what they can do is they can use a beam to almost like possess someone else and speak and act through that person, you see the same thing in the Matrix with them possessing people and taking them over, and in they live you never knew who might be one of them without your real world glasses on. It’s just an interesting concept and it’s also interesting because you see this theme in so many movies, and then we have a society where large portions are informants. Plus there is concept that some are in constant contact, with others who they are getting orders from and instructions. It’s interesting the movies that are out there.

Set Up’s.

Online recently other than falsely labeling my site, there seems to be an effort by some to paint me as a person who is bashing others and creating infighting. If bashing others means calling it like it is, and telling the truth about what is ongoing, then so be it, but the same standards they use for others, they better use for themselves. Second with infighting. Guess what, the reason I believe in a leaderless resistance is because for the most part it avoids that. The way this system works is that each sector does their own thing, it’s just like how each fusion center does it’s own thing, well if we want to be effective, each mini resistance to a degree has to do it’s own thing, no two can be or should be exactly alike, and that makes it harder to eliminate everyone. The same tactics they use, we should use similar. I remember in the movie V and V the final battle each city had it’s own chapter of the resistance.

Therefore since I tend to stay separate for the most part, unless someone does something deliberate like attacking my website, with some phony witch hunt, then I don’t have a problem with anyone, but if you expect to attack me or mine without getting it back, or getting called on it, it’s not going to happen.

Offline.

They seem to be really trying to squeeze my resources. Not just me, but those around me and anyone that might be of aid or assistance to me. I remember when Mark M. Rich on his old site talked about this. He had a couple of sisters and they all sold their homes and moved into smaller places, places that he would not be able to stay at if he should become homeless.

I remember that they made Rachel homeless, and another target was homeless when they further took his resources away, arrested him, and turned him into an informant. See that’s why I try to not judge people, because I remember some of the stuff that I have read.

Also the reason some of stay alive this long, I like to think it’s because we are a bit clever, but in reality it might just be because they can keep us on the borders. See people like Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan, they had means, and Jeremy was loyal to her. You could not get them both by making them poor, unemployed whatever, so Theresa was found dead one day, apparently a suicide, and Jeremy shortly after because he was so upset about her suicide. I have always believe these were not suicides, but proving it is another story.

For those who don’t know the story here is a link.
https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/category/jeremy-blake/

I should point out that Theresa on her blog if I recall correctly had her FOIA and it showed that she had been investigated. I would have to double check this, but I think that is correct.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1201450715

Also Ruth Goodman seems to have been someone ok, in that she owned her own home, and she had gotten past the psychological attacks when they had her arrested, implanted her in some way, and that’s when the audio harassment started. She died shortly after that, supposedly under mysterious circumstances.

The closest I ever came to know more about Ruth, was finding one of her postings on a forum, but the time I went to find out more information about her, I found out that she was already dead, but her story moved me, and I have remembered it.

I think the reason they were taken out is that the state did not readily have ways to make them vulnerable, and wanted to find other ways to deal with them, and thus they did.

This is a path that no one should have to travel alone, and yet in some ways we might be safer if we do. I would remind people about some of my experiences on some of these forums, and some of the tactics that disinfo agents and informants use.

Disinformation

Also offline they seem to be trying for mini setup’s, little things that you might not think of, but things that might get you in trouble. I have always been law abiding, and continue to be, but that does not mean they are not testing the waters to see if they can find a weak spot or a way in, trust no one, seems to be the key. It’s pretty horrible, how they own people once they do set them up. I have witnessed this close up, seen people that I use to know, and they are shells, it’s like they own their souls or try to, whatever they do, it’s sick, and I would say it’s against God, because what they do, contributes to the darkness of this world, and it’s not in favor of the light what they do. All good people, must stand against this.

Rachel Hoffman is a good example of how they can make a good kid turn desperate. She was so desperate to have her own charges dropped that she was willing to first try to set up one of her friends, and then she was willing to do a drug buy, to try to get her records dropped and get the hell out of dodge, but she lost her life doing this, and the same way they can make someone like Rachel Hoffman desperate, is the same way they work on other people, little by little. There is something truly wrong with these people.

Rachel Hoffman. Disturbing thoughts

Anyways just to bear witness for myself again, I am anti drugs, never dabbled in anything illegal that I am aware of, don’t plan to.

Again I would remind people the material is there, use it, while it’s still available. Back it up, post it in various places, etc. I have seen a lot in just the last three years, and pray constantly, I think it’s one of the only ways we can hold back the darkness, for any length of time.

Gang Stalking. FOIA request.

Gang Stalking FOIA.
Is this specific FOIA request a ploy by the FBI to discredit targets and profile them as schizophrenic? Will this letter place targets on a watch list? Is it meant to be disinformation for targets? Is this letter actually helpful in anyway to targets?
http://asianvictimsassociation.ning.com/forum/topics/gang-stalking-foia-request
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/gang-stalking-foia-request

I came across this letter back in December. At the time I had major concerns about it. I posted those concerns as comments, so that if the user saw the letter they would at least think before they emailed or mailed off a document that could potentially send them to a mental institution or get them placed on a watch list.
Here is a portion of the FOIA request, and for those more familiar with good FOIA request, you can let me know what you think.
[quote]12.   Any FBI records indicating coercion or bribery being used by gang stalking groups to force or bribe neighbors, local businesses and others in the community of a targeted individual to participate in the gang stalking methods/activities directed against one or more targeted individuals within a community.  

13.   Any FBI records indicating the motives behind the stalking of individuals such as personal vendettas, family vendettas, whistle-blowing (corporate and government), employment disputes/lawsuits, political views, sexual orientation, interracial relationships, gay and lesbian relationships, HIV status, business disputes, marital disputes, monetary disputes, and any other similar motives for gang stalking.  

 14.   Any FBI records indicating the funding of gang stalking groups including, but not limited to, narcotic and other racketeering funds, corporate funds, local business funds and government money (e.g. paid informants), monetary crimes by the gang stalkers, or, payment for surveillance or intelligence collected by gang stalking groups paid for by racketeers, narco-traffickers and/or other criminal associations made to the gang stalkers for services gang stalking groups rendered.  

 15.   Any FBI records indicating the number of informants (paid and unpaid) under the control of federal, state and local law enforcement within these gang stalking groups. For instance, during the Civil Rights Era the FBI now acknowledges 20% of KKK members were informants.  

 16.   Any FBI records relating to a List on which gang stalking victims are placed which initiates and/or maintains the gang stalking activities against them.  

 17.   Any FBI records indicating a hierarchy within the gang stalking groups including a chain of command.  
[/quote]
 

Here is a link on my forum to my concerns about this letter, which I have now seen on YouTube, and posted in other places.
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1226891452

When I saw the letter I spoke to the originator of the letter directly to find out what was going on. He claims to have experience with this stuff, claims to be a lawyer, but based on this FOIA request, I had very deep concerns. I believe my comments have been deleted from the thread and the plan has gone forward, so that’s why I am highlighting this in several places.

Before sending off a FOIA request you might want to run it past a lawyer. I am taking the time to post about this because I have a few concerns, specifically that this could get a target put on a watch list, or the letters could be used to profile targets as mentally unstable and could be a problem for activists in future. Just think of this letter arriving in multiple forms for all their behavioural specialists. It seems to have been designed that way. I don’t claim to be an expert, but I did take the time to find what others had done, and how they had requested FOIA requests.
http://www.rcfp.org/foiact/index.html
http://www.rcfp.org/foiact/guide_h.html
[quote]
Your address
Daytime phone number

Date

Agency Administrator
Agency
Address

FOIA Appeal

Dear Administrator:

This is an appeal under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552.

On (date) I made a FOIA request to your agency for (brief description of what you requested). On (date), your agency denied my request on the grounds that (state the reasons given by the agency). Copies of my request and the denial are enclosed.

(When the agency delays:) It has been (state number) business days since my request was received by your agency. This period clearly exceeds the 20 days provided by the statute, thus I deem my request denied. A copy of my correspondence and the postal form showing receipt by your office are enclosed.

The information which I have requested is clearly releasable under FOIA and, in my opinion, may not validly be protected by any of the Act’s exemptions.

(Here, insert legal and “public policy” arguments in favor of disclosure, if you wish. You are not required to make legal or policy arguments to support your appeal; if you simply state “I appeal” the agency will review the documents and the justifications given in the original denial. However, it is usually a good idea to try to persuade them to release the information. See the Federal Open Government Guide (www.rcfp.org/fogg/index.php?i=ex1) for further information on any of the specific exemptions cited by the agency in their denial of your original request. The descriptions contained there should suggest arguments you can make to counter the agency’s assertions.)

I trust that upon re-consideration, you will reverse the decision denying me access to this material and grant my original request. However, if you deny this appeal, I intend to initiate a lawsuit to compel disclosure. (Don’t include this as an idle threat. But if you do intend to follow up with a lawsuit, say so. Often the agency will more closely consider its position when it knows it will have to defend it in court soon.)

As I have made this request in the capacity of a journalist (or author, or scholar) and this information is of timely value, I would appreciate your expediting the consideration of my appeal in every way possible. In any case, I will expect to receive your decision within 20 business days, as required by the statute.

Thank you for your assistance.

Very truly yours,

Your signature
[/quote]
http://epic.org/privacy/fusion/VA_FOIA021208.pdf

The first two links above are for generic requests, and the pdf is a link from a group called epic and how they went about requesting info for a fusion center.

It really important how you approach the issue. Based on events that happened during Cointelpro, I am worried that this letter might be another Cointelpro like tactic, that’s why before sending in this letter, I would recommend targets check with a lawyer, or someplace that’s familiar with FOIA requests to see if this letter would be helpful, or if it’s more likely to get them put on a watch list, be deemed as mentally ill, or
if this letter would actually be helpful to them.

You can always use the generic letters provided. Those should be safe and pretty effective. I think to the new target online who wants to be active this letter might be detrimental to them. Again I don’t claim to be an expert. I would just encourage targets to review this before putting themselves in jeopardy.

Deconstructing David Lawson

http://terroriststalking.wordpress.com/

I have wanted to make this post for some time now. As many people in the Targeted Individual community may know, for several years, since 9/11 there has been a book that many targets have been referencing called Terrorist Stalking In America. The book first claimed that the stalking or harassment was being done by extremist groups.

Then just as quickly as David Lawson wrote the book, he seemed to go missing again. We were assured by some community leader that he was too busy and could not be interviewed, but a lot of things never made sense. When I started to do my own investigation into what was behind Gang Stalking, I started to learn ask even more questions.

If they were extremists how did he get out? He claims to have been in these stalking groups for several years, that he was one of them, that they are dangerous, and use intimidation methods to keep their members in line.

Anyways I recently came across a posting at who is a rat and I thought it would be nice to review the posting and go over it with my own interpretation.
I don’t know how many targets read this book, and went to the authorities talking about terrorist only to be institutionalised, or called the phone company to say that extremists were driving cable cars, or toss pop on cops, but I hope this interpretation will help future targets.

Anyways if you follow this link, you can read up on deconstructing David Lawson. 
http://terroriststalking.wordpress.com/

Gang Stalking Myths and Disinformation

There are two trends starting up, and both need to be killed.

The first is that some people are going around trying to convince targets that it’s a good idea to engage Citizen Informants. Eg. Punch them out etc. Now the temptation is there, these people harass us, and are destroying our lives, we would have every right to want to take out our frustrations. It’s a great idea in theory, but it’s a bad idea in practice. They are not good enough for us to waste the time energy or whatever else it is. They are parasitic and like any parasite you want them off you, removed from you, I get that, but please don’t let anyone talk you into doing anything stupid, and yes we must daily try to not lose our tempers out in public. Otherwise what I do in the no longer privacy of my own home, is still my business as far as I am concerned.

The David Lawson book is a great example of this. I was reading a post from http://www.whosarat.com and here is a great part. This book is so misleading.

[quote]
Many of them will give the impression that they are police without showing a badge or stating that they are police officers, but others will claim to be police officers. Group members may also wear the uniforms of city and county workers, and telephone, cable or utility company employees, in order to get into the residence of a target, or some other place of interest to them.

They will walk around a mall, following a target, with jackets which say “Security”, with their scanners, pagers and cell phones and they believe the illusion. Some targets have said that an excellent way to antagonize groups is to “disrespect” them, by “accidentally” stepping on the feet of “police” officers, laughing in their faces, “accidentally” spilling drinks on them, etc. it seems to upset their sense of reality and causes the group members to doubt themselves.Groups take revenge when a group member has been assaulted or “disrespected”. That revenge can take the form of an assault on the target or damage to his property.
[/quote]

They will wear the uniforms of these places because they work for these places. They will walk around the mall with a jacket that says security, because they may well be security. (This is not always the case, some bone heads just like the look, but otherwise, they are likely security.)

Listen to this, he is trying to incite targets to step on the foot of someone in a police officers uniform, are you kidding me? Laugh in their face, oh yeah they love that, or spill a drink on them. This is a good way to wind up in jail or the psycho ward.

It doesn’t upset their sense of reality if they are a real cop, all it does is give them a reason to do what they were trying to do, and then justify it. It will also give them the impression that the target was really crazy, because what sane person does that? Ok well some sane people would do this, because they don’t like officers, but it’s not a good idea.

That book will give you truth, and then it will give you little tips like the above, to get you in trouble. Imagine how many people read that book, then go file a police report about terrorist stalking them? Mental ward. How many take the advise to report cable workers, and other people in uniform as not really working for the cable company, and just imposter’s? (Yeah the cable company will really appreciate that.) Just one more thing to prove that you are not mentally stable. If you follow the advise in this book, it’s a good way in some cases to get locked away. It has a lot of good information, mixed in with disinformation and they know.

Second the latest trend, Gang Stalking is a myth, or you are just not that special. Why would anyone want to follow you around? Beats the heck out of me, but they are. I have been law abiding, never into drugs, or anything illegal, my entire life, but this is the mentality of a good person. We think people only do things to bad people, but Workplace Mobbing, Cointelpro, Stasi Germany, the current surveillance that’s happening shows us that average decent people are capable of being targeted for harassment.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-559130/Why-didnt-just-knock-door-ask-couple-tailed-weeks-council-spies.html?printingPage=true

The family in this story that were targeted for intrusive government surveillance because the state thought they were faking where they lived. To a normal person like myself and others, we would just ask them for a letter, or show up at their house one day to see how little Johnny was doing, not these people. Their mentally was to follow these people around 24/7. They paid and hired Informants AKA Human Intelligence Sources. These people were spied on 24/7, had their every move action written down and recorded, do you think that they were that special? Did you think that the state would waste that much money on people that they thought lived in the wrong area of town?

Then you realise they are now routinely using these investigations for anit-social behaviour, dog fouling, putting the garbage out on the wrong day, oh these people must be special indeed to warrant such attention, well they are not, but they are getting such attentions wither they ask for it or not. 

Now imagine us, in many cases where they are trying to spread rumours that we are mentally ill, paranoid, schizophrenic, EDP, Terrorist, danger to society, pedophile, person of interest, drug dealer, user, etc

If they would do that for dog fouling, antisocial behaviour, imagine what they are doing to targets of Gang Stalking? So when someone says you are not that special, that state won’t waste that much money on you, they are stating a myth, because the state is routinely doing this. What you might want to do, is waste two seconds or your precious time and educate these people, if not, just leave them to wallow in their own ignorance till it happens to them or someone they know.

Gang Stalking as a myth is the next trend they are trying to perpetrate. We have ample proof of Cointelrpo, East Germany, and current surveillance and even the tactics that are employed. If they don’t like the word gang stalking, they can use the term unjust surveillance and harassment of innocent citizens by the state, call it what you will, it’s the same thing, it’s happening, and yes we are all apparently that special.

Lastly if you do get in a situation where you do something silly, and you are in a mental ward, or jail, and they offer to let you become one of them, because you would be doing the country a favor to keep an eye on dangerous people, don’t believe the hype or the bs. What they are doing to us is illegal and wrong, the little things they would ask you to do would steal your soul, and leave you less of a person then if you stayed in jail. Targets and others who get entrapped some report that it’s like whoring for the state.  So it’s something to keep in mind. Let’s kill the myths and work towards exposing this, we have  all the same old dirty bags of tricks being used plus some new ones, they think they know us, but let’s know ourselves better, and above all pray.

Mind Hacks

Is there a pattern forming?

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1227694042
I asked this question after realising that an article about Truman Show delusion, Internet delusion and climate change delusion came out back in August 29, 2008. It was written by Sarah Kershaw and in the article she mentioned Joel and Ian Gold, both brothers. Both psychiatrists, one out of New York, one now in Toronto, who are writing about Truman show delusion.
The second article which you might be more familiar with is the New York Times article again by Sarah Kershaw, November 13, 2008, with mentions of Vaughan Bell, Dr Hoffman and unnamed concerned health professionals.

The third article is by Jennifer Peltz, where she writes about Truman Show Delusion, this came out 11/24/08. She also references the brothers Gold and Vaughan Bell again in the article.

Now wither or not it’s a new trend to write about delusions or as some suspect an actual attempt by the system to give society the impression that people claiming to be watched are delusional is anyone’s guess. 
I was going back over my writings and I did want to make one thing clear. When I first read the Sarah Kershaw article, I wrote about it. Now the pen or in this case my typing fingers might have been a bit faster than my mind. What I mean is, I was looking back at what I wrote, and it seemed to be critical of the article. I never meant to be critical of the article, and I apologize if it came across that way. What I was actually concerned about was the new “syndromes” that had appeared in the article. Specifically the Internet Delusions and to a lesser extend the Truman show delusion.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/?s=keep+the+faith
The first article by Sarah Kershaw was actually an interesting, informative and insightful read. It was a pretty well written article, I didn’t mean that I wanted the article to fail. What I meant was that I had really specific concerns more specifically, about the findings that had been exposed in the article. 

Here is some background information about my concerns. Since coming across the David Lawson book Terrorist Stalking in America and his conclusions that this is being done by vigilante groups and then his follow up book which claims this is being done by terrorist or anti-government groups, I have long suspected the work to be a disinformation piece that was meant to destroy and harm the credibility of targets should they go to the police or health professionals with his conclusions.
This is what I wrote about David Lawson back in December 2006.

[quote]
If what he says about these stalking crews are true. These crews are illegal, dangerous, well connected and you would not want to be writing a book about their activities without consent. Members stay in the group out of fear, blackmail, the sense of power it gives them. The reason they work so well, and have become so powerful is because they work in secrecy. Secrecy, and yet he was allowed to write a book about them and go on his merry way?

No reprisals? No revenge? He is either really brave, and lucky. Really deceptive and wrong. Or maybe somewhere in between?
[/quote]
Since then David Lawson has reappeared, his book is off the satellite stealing website, and it’s now widely available at amazon, with the new conclusions, that this is being done by terrorist, and anti-government groups.
David Lawson claims to have been a detective for 12 years, then he claims that he was a part of these stalking groups for several more years. My question has always been, why was he allowed to write the book if they are so dangerous? He claims to have been one of them for several years, so how do we know he can be trusted? Later after doing my own research and talking to others, I realised that his conclusions were false and that a detective of 12 years could not have come to such false conclusions easily, especially one that claims to have travelled with them for several years. I have maintained that I think the book is disinformation.

 
I wondered if at some point the establishment would have an illness similar or one that matched his conclusions. After reading the article and doing some research, I came across this.
http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2005/05/internet_delusions.html

[quote]
This paper analyzes four case-reports and notes that, contrary to the traditional view, the cases are examples where an internet-theme has particular clinical implications.

In one case, a patient began to have paranoid thoughts and used an internet search engine to investigate suspicions about an ingredient on a chewing gum packet.

Her searches led her to believe she had discovered a secret terrorist network, and was therefore being personally targeted by the authorities using phone taps and hidden cameras.
[/quote]
I read over the case study, and the first case study presented was unrelated. My concerns however with these new findings is that they don’t take current factors into consideration when making their diagnosis. Eg. The real danger that people’s concerns about surveillance could have some basis in truth. 

The other concern is the fact that there might be disinformation material being deliberately distributed to the public by specific sources. I am sure this is a foreign concept for many members of mainstream society, but practices such as Cointelpro have shown us that, false Media Stories, Faked dirty letters, poems, and satirical comic books were among the FBI’s many devices for pitting activists against one another. 

In the past it was used to discredit dissidents, today it could be providing a similar function.

http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/electronic-publications/stay-free/archives/19/fbi.html

Poisioned Pill? You would know.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1223643445

I don’t have a lot of time to blog right now, but I was online taking care of some things believe it or not, and I came across a thread, which lead me to a post that I felt the need to address. I really didn’t want to waste the time, but I felt the need.

What I am going to re-post is pretty well what I posted on my forum.

Ok so I was out on one of my strolls around the Internet. I usually stay away from certain specific people for so many reasons. Anyways I came across a thread that links to these two postings which I will address here and then on my blog.

Here are the links. For those of you who don’t know. The author is “suppose to be” a top leader for the Gang Stalking Community.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vertacs/message/231

In addressing the first link I wrote.

Since the above post refers to my website, then I think it’s important to address the attacks or issues posted there.

Apparently my site is a poison pill site. The author would know more about poison pills than I would, but I digress. Let me address the comments and meat of the article.

The top two gang stalking techniques are air stalking and brighting because the author of the Gang Stalking World website, fancies a little thing called alphabetical ordering. For those of you who do not know what this means, it means to place items in a list from A-Z.

This means that items that we experience that begin with A will be listed first, then items that begin with B will be listed second and so forth.

Hopefully the none targets will have enough common sense to understand the concept of alphabetical listings. If they do not, I am not responsible for human stupidity, contrary to popular beliefs.

Let’s go to the young mother with the cellphone. Since we now know that children as young as 8 are being recruited to be Covert Human Intelligence Sources, and the site goes on to back this up with appropriate details, then it should be no problem for the common person to understand the concept of how the stalking takes place.

This way the average person can conceptualise what we mean about the stalking being subtle. I also had this concept from another magazine from several years ago, that showed a picture of a mom with a stroller and her shadow was that of a cop. The picture was done to illustrate what the civilian spies would be like. The concept was a good one then, and in my personal opinion is a good one now.

Remember I am not just sitting here daily. I am trying on a continuous bases to bridge the gap between what we experience and what the normal realm has not. I have studied what does and does not work. I have done a great deal to make sure that this does get normalised, and that the actual truth comes out, which is more than I can say for others.

I also wrote and have been meaning to address this issues for some time now, in relationship to the term Gang Stalking.

The term Gang Stalking and why I think it works. When I first came online, there were a lot of terms for what were happening, Gang Stalking, Multi Stalking, Vengeance Stalking, etc, etc.

Over time while I was doing research to try to find out what Gang Stalking was, part of what I tried to do was get the term normalised in society as another website had suggested that we do. This was part of my early activism.

I was able by working the search engines to ensure that the term was well placed and became adapted and more accepted in more normal society.

I think the only people that the term truly confuses, that I have come across in the last 2 years, are people that are citizen informants who have a specific effort to try to discredit the term. You might get the odd person who is truly confused, but overall, this is a term that many normal people have come to understand.

If you change the name, we will and would have had to start all over again. In the middle of trying to get the term normalised, a so called community leader had tried to get the term dropped, and I disagreed with this person and for that reason fought to keep the term alive.

Eg. Imagine if we stopped calling ourselves Targeted Individuals tomorrow and tried for a new term? The same process of normalizing this will begin all over again and that is not good for any movement.

I think if anyone that I have come across in the last two years reads the information they understand what this is.

Also when People go looking for help outside of the community and go searching in their normal places, they use the term gang stalking, mostly. I find that after two years of a lot of garbage, people in normal circles recognise this term and are able to tell people what to do to get help.

I constantly check to see if this is working. I think any attempt to get rid of the term is counter productive for these reason, and I also think this was part of the reason for the attempt by certain parties.

That’s my feedback on the term Gang Stalking. As for the other matters with the young mother and the terms for what happens to us, I am going to be addressing that.

In addressing the second link I wrote.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vertacs/messages/245?xm=1&m=e&l=1

Now apparently my site is run by Don Russell? Who the hell is that suppose to be? This is like the time starfish perp said that I was imitating some other guy that I did not know at the time. I really appreciate the methods used. Also I appreciate that they went behind my back.

It’s all good, what is done in darkness will be revealed in light, sooner or later. The day will come. Sooner than later I hope.

[quote]
For example, this site is titled “gangstalking”, a term which may sound great at first hearing,
but when used in conversations with non-targets, has shown that non-targets consistently think
in terms of youth/race/biker/Mafia gangs. [/quote]

Since I actually do know what I am talking about. I get this from time to time believe me. Some will go oh yeah those gang’s out there. In my personal experience, this is only from the multitude of civilian informants. The same way they operate offline, they operate online the exact same way. People who actually want to listen, none targets, in my two years of posting on forums, do understand the concept and respond well to the subject matter. (Well now they do.)

Also considering that the website on the very front lists this

[quote]Gang Stalking is a systemic form of control, which seeks to destroy every aspect of a Targeted Individuals life. The target is followed around and placed under surveillance by Civilian Spies/Snitches 24/7.

The Civilian Spies can be parts of these community oriented policing programs, but most often they are just average citizens. Just like with Cointelpro investigations, everyone in the targets life is contacted and asked to be a part of the ongoing, never ending, monitoring (systemic harassment), which is designed to destroy the target over years and leave them with no form of support.

A short and simple definition of gang stalking.
What is Gang Stalking?

Gang Stalking is experienced by Targeted Individuals as psychological attack, that is capable of immobilizing and destroying a target over time. The covert methods used often leave no evidence to incriminate the Civilian Spies.

It’s similar to workplace mobbing, but takes place outside in the community. It called Gang Stalking, because groups of community Spies organise to stalk and monitor targets 24/7. [/quote]

Again I take no responsibility for human stupidity, or organised citizen informants, or government agents. I think a logical thinking human who is not a perp will understand the concept of what is being said. This site over the last two years for anyone who has been following, has been worked and reworked just so that it can help the average person to understand what we are talking about. When new information comes it’s continually worked into the site. Also on the main FAQ page exhibit B

[quote]
What are some techniques used against targets?

A few of the most common techniques are listed below.

a) Classical conditioning.

Getting a Targeted Individual sensitized to an everyday stimuli. The targeted individual over a period of months, or even years is negatively sensitised to an everyday stimuli, which is then used to harass them. It’s used out in public to let them know they are constantly being harassed and monitored. Some examples of everyday stimulus that might be used include: sounds, colors, patterns, actions. Eg. Red, white, yellow, strips, pens clicking, key jangling, loud coughing, loud whistling, loud smacking of clapping of hands together, cell phones, laptops, etc.

b) 24/7 Surveillance This will involve following the target everywhere they go. Learning about the target. Where they shop, work, play, who their friends and family are. Getting close to the target, moving into the community or apartment where they live, across the street. Monitoring the targets phone, house, and computer activity. Surveillance Policy.

c) Isolation of said target.

This is done via slander campaigns, and lies. Eg. People in the targets community are told that the target is a thief, into drugs, a prostitute, pedophile, crazy, in trouble for something, needs to be watched. Files will even be produced on the target, shown to neighbours, family, store keepers.

d) Noise and mimicking campaigns.

Disrupting the targets life, sleep with loud power tools, construction, stereos, doors slamming, etc. Talking in public about private things in the targets life. Mimicking actions of the target. Basically letting the target know that they are in the targets life. Daily interferences, nothing that would be too overt to the untrained eye, but psychologically degrading and damaging to the target over time.

e) Everyday life breaks and street theatre.

Flat tires, sleep deprivation, drugging food, putting dirt on targets property. Mass strangers doing things in public to annoy targets. These strangers might get text messaged to be at a specific time and place, and perform a specific action.

It might seem harmless to these Citizen Informants, but it could be causing great psychological trauma for the target. Eg. Blocking targets path, getting ahead of them in line, cutting or boxing them in on the road, saying or doing things to elicit a response from targets. Etc. It’s like the death of a thousand paper cuts. One or two minor incidents will not cause any harm to the target, but over time the target is slowly worn down. [/quote]

It lists these as the main symptoms of Gang Stalking. On to the next bit.

[quote]
While many of us believe, with good cause, that government is heavily involved, without courtroom quality evidence, a statement like that above is discrediting. [/quote]

Suddenly courtroom evidence is needed? Really? When the same author was sprouting off information about vigilante gangs, where was the court room information then? Right.

Also we don’t need court room information. We have historical facts, we also have current news articles about how the anti-terror laws are being abused. We have dozens of items about covert government actions. We have Gloria Naylor, and other significant targets who can directly link this with government involvement, yet suddenly we need a courtroom document, really?

Again I have already addressed the mother and the child issue. Not only is this what they really do in real life, but it’s a concept image. For anyone who this works. It’s a useful tool for bringing the understanding gap, between the targeted and the none targeted.

[quote]
“Civilian spies are recruited from every level and sector of society.”

“Spies” is a term I would NEVER use to label our perps. Non targets, at this stage in current affairs,
are not prepared to think their neighbourhood is full of “spies.” To use the term “spies”, I suggest,
is very likely to draw the you-are-paranoid response from unaware non-targets. [/quote]

Well many people would never call them Stasi either, or Snitches or Citizen Informants, etc. Many people have different labels for the same things. My site uses various labels to help different people understand the concepts better. Over the last two years. I have talked to people. I have researched, and there are lot’s of different people who will visit the site, there are lot’s of other people who are going to be targeted.

The word spies will appeal to one sort of audience because they understand, oh community spies. Another person will understand, Snitches, cause they come from a community where the stop snitching movement is in full affect and they are familiar with that term. Others will understand the term Stasi because they dealt with this before. Over the last two years I have made every effort to reach a wide variety of audience members, and to ensure than whoever comes to the site, from whichever demographic to get help, they will see terms and read language that is familiar to them.

I have done the same thing with the media that I use. I am trying to do this with the flags that were recently added, since I realised that others in others languages do want access to the information. It’s not a perfect translation, but it will give more people access to help.

Also in doing research for what is behind Gang Stalking, I encountered a wide variety of articles, some used the term spies, actually quite a few used that term. So again, just like some prefer the term organised stalking, while others prefer community mobbing, and others Gang Stalking, it’s all the same term for the same thing, and using a wider variety of terms, reaches a wider audience.

To each their own, but my site has helped many people over the years. The site and the blog, because people see images and concepts that they are familiar with, remember my site is about helping targets first and foremost.

Also my site does have a fair bit of history and also current events on how these programs have been used, and who has used them. It’s always been the same source, be it Cointelpro, Red Squads, Stasi, etc.

I don’t know who Don is, and don’t care. My site in it’s current incarnation will continue to do what it has always done, and that’s help people.

Two years ago when I came online looking into what I thought was harassment, then mobbing then gang stalking, there was help, but not truth. I was chasing phantom vigilante groups, and that was one of the popular terms at the time. A term that was being brandied about. I have no doubt that the term gang stalking was originally chosen to spread confusion, but in the last two years. I and some others have worked really hard to bring the truth of this darkness into the light, and I will not let it be overshadowed.

So I will leave this posting by saying to each his or her own. Your instincts have brought you this far, you know that offline there are many that can not be trusted. You know how programs like Cointelpro worked, and if you don’t, go read up on them.

I have spent two years learning, you have been there with me for most of that time. I hope you will not let anyone or anything deceive you from the truth of what is really happening to us, and what is really behind this.

A little disinformation

A little disinformation goes a long way. I am not above falling for it at times.

When I came online, I didn’t know about disinformation agents, those topics were foreign to me, it was conspiracy stuff. Now words and terms like this are common everyday words to me. Things have become so different now, and it’s a word that comes up a lot.

How do you know what is real and what is fake? You don’t even I don’t, not always. I have over time become better at it, and can spot things a lot better, but even I have my moments.

I just came across a really good example of this recently. I came across a post using information from my site, now it’s cool, I don’t information being used from my site, I don’t mind that at all. However there were two points that I noticed which caused me some concern. Now I have spoken to the person and asked them to use the post in full, and not separated, or changed.

However the two parts of the post that worried me were these.

The ended was changed, transposed, the ended that was drawn changed my conclusions about what is behind gang stalking, well not changed them, rather inserted specific conclusions that I did not use on the website. The other part that was worrying is that the post said that the former Stasi signals that were being used back in East Germany were the exact ones being used now.

My site does not say this.

 
Original text

[quote]Communicate happens in a number of ways. When on the street or in cars patrolling, they use baseball or Stasi like signals. Citizen Informants also seem to get verbal ques via cellphone and earphones.

These include things like tapping the side of the nose, corner of the eye, brushing back the hair 3 times, the infamous double blink, etc.

Here is a list of signals that the former East German Secret Police the Stasi used. http://www.nthposition.com/stasiland.php [/quote]
Those are some of the differences.

[quote]How do participants communicate?

Communication happens in a number of ways. When on the street or in cars patrolling, they use baseball or Stasi like signals. These include things like tapping the side of the nose, corner of the eye, brushing back the hair 3 times, the infamous double blink, etc.

This evil is so bizarre that the perpetrators have a party/celebration when they have collectively destroyed an innocent victim. We collectively have to “Stop The Madness” or Fascism will destroy everything, regardless. It is your duty to copy this article and spread the truth about what’s really happening in the community.

Here is a small list of groups/organisations that get used to destroy society (and themselves). Masons, Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Knights of Columbus, Opus Dei, Speculative Society, Round Table, Rotarians, Orange Order, Scientology, Monarch Programming, all Religions and Institutions. Also people who have been baited/set up/conned, etc. Here is a list of Stasi signals that the these groups use at Stasi secret police. http://www.nthposition.com/stasiland.php
[/quote]

As you can see there is quite an addition to what my site says. I don’t know if they have a party after. Sure if you copy the article with that ending, it will not be my words, or the words of my site as the original article appears.

Now that small list could probably be all involved, but to put it in as my sites information is not correctly reusing content from the site.

Also that list is not what is being used now, that link is to the former Stasi Signals.

I have seen posts where people give feedback on the posting with the changed ending, always lot’s of good feedback, but it’s not in accordance with what is on the site.

That’s three things that an unsuspecting target could come across and take for granted as true, because the rest of the article is correct.

Now since I have already spoken to the person, this is not about that, but it got me thinking about a lot of the information out there. Like the movie Zeitgeist, a lot of people watch this movie and they see that the 9/11 stuff is true, and so assume the whole movie is true and correct. I tend to disagree, with some parts of it.

I have seen the same thing with David Icke. I like David Icke, but on more than one occasion, I have watched a video or something that he has said, and the whole things will be correct, then he will put in something that I feel is not correct, or could be unintentional disinformation.

We are not perfect and I have stated that when I first came online, I was for a short time, falling for the vigilante stalking, bs. I got past that quickly, but for a time, I was probably capable of repeating that crap to other people and not doing myself or anyone else any favors.

The point of this post is, that a little disinformation goes a long way. The lies that they tell about us, most times they might be mixed in with enough truth to sound convincing and most people do not take the time to examine things, to go deeper, to look for the truth. They accept the surface stuff, and that’s all that they have ever needed. I am the same at times. I am getting better now that I know about disinfo agents, and how these people spread lies, but the majority of the population, they don’t know this stuff, they take things mostly at surface value.

I would say be mindful of this and remember that a little disinformation goes a long way, a little leaven will spoil the whole loaf.