Three years ago I heard the story of a young mother that stabbed her two children in a gas station bathroom. She only a few days before had spoken out about a neighbour stabbing her younger brothers dog to death, and then within days had stabbed her own children to death. When I heard the story at the time. I firmly felt that it was a case of Gang Stalking. I didn’t know why, I really had very little proof to go on, and very few details were forth coming in the case, well three years later, I have many more details and I feel there was a good chance she was on a Threat Assessment Hit List.
I recap with the link to hightech harassment. One of the things the site talks about is how many times parents especially it seems mothers are tricked into killing their children, via external voices.
The sonic harassment technology in addition to tricking people into believing their house is haunted can be used to trick a mother into believing that she is speaking directly to God. A mother claiming that she received instructions from God to kill her children is easily accomplished with this classified sonic harassment technology. Secret police living in a neighboring house to the targeted mother can use the technology against the mother and trick her into killing her children. The targeted mother will be carefully screened by the surveillance conducted by the agents before being selected to have the sonic technology used against her. Usually a mother with a history of mental illness is selected.
At the time I felt that there was more to the story of why she killed her kids, when she had just days before spoken out about how horrible it was for someone to kill a dog.
The story that I found is that of someone who worked for the postal service, the court trials claims that she lost her job due to problems with her co-workers and paranoid delusions about them. Where these the same time of paranoid delusions that Yvonne Hiller was having?
The court heard evidence from two psychiatrists who both agreed that Ms Hawes was suffering from schizophrenia. In early 2007 Ms Hawes began having paranoid delusions about her work colleagues which eventually led to her losing her job. She was prescribed anti-depressants in July 2007 but her paranoia increased and she began to hear voices which were controlling her actions.
In the days leading up to the double murder Ms Hawes was traveling around the country with her two children because she believed she was being pursued by something or someone. On November 29th 2007 she took a kitchen knife from her home and fled with her two children, when she reached a convenience store about a mile from her home she began to hear voices telling her to kill the children.
“I didn’t want them to have to run anymore,” Ms. Hawes told her psychiatrist. “I was trying to protect them … to stop them from being chased.
“I heard voices in the bathroom telling me to stab my kids.”
The post office is notorious for people going postal. My strong suspicion is that Hawes was placed on a Threat Assessment List for monitoring. She was likely given a level 3 or 2 threat level and thus her Gang Stalking and Electronic Harassment would have been peek. Level 2 being almost the highest level. This would have mean active monitoring, and everyone around her being alerted, it would have also meant that people would have been actively following her around, maybe even harassing her, irregardless of her having the two children in her possession.
This would corresponds with her fears of being on the run, and arming herself because she felt someone was out to do her harm. The voices might have been internal, but they could also have been very external and technology based, telling her to kill her children. This might help explain how she was able to so radically change and kill her children just a few short days later.
PRIORITY 2 (High Risk): Poses threat of violence or self-harm but lacks immediacy or access to target. Requires active monitoring and case management plan.
PRIORITY 3 (Moderate Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self harm, but exhibits significantly disruptive behaviors and/or need for assistance. Requires active monitoring, case management plan, and appropriate referrals.
Can I prove this is what happened? I might someday be able to prove that she was on a Threat Assessment List and thus followed around. I don’t know if I will be able to prove that remote neural monitoring in the form of voice to target transmission was employed, which helped and encouraged her to murder her two innocent children.
In any case Hawes has been written off as another Paranoid Schizophrenic, who was hearing voices, had paranoid beliefs and killed her children. No further investigation or evidence needed.
A poster wrote in to clarify my opinion as to why I distance myself from some Gang Stalking initiavites. He asked me specifically about Ms. White and here is my response.
Ms White does several things that I am personally not in accord with.
She focuses on the Stalking aspect of Gang Stalking. Nothing wrong with that, but the few times I have come across her initiatives she has focused on linking this primarily to stalking and changing those laws. Nothing wrong with that, but I don’t believe this will change what is happening to Gang Stalking targets. Changing stalking laws will not change community notifications if that is what we are looking at. You have to name it if you are going to claim it.
I have always focused on the mobbing aspect of this harassment and focusing on the stalking aspect in my opinion is going to be less effective. I have from the start believed that mobbing and the way mobbing targets emotionally act out, best corrolates to the Gang Stalking movement.
Ms White has often criticized websites as bad sites, poison sites, etc, for linking the Gang Stalking harassment to government and state initiatives. That fine, yet other sites seem to get a pass for doing the same thing, and she manages to keep them off her credibility review websites. Ms White has continued to advocate Terrorist Stalking in America, a book that links Gang Stalking first to Stalking crews then to terrorists. She is always asking for proof, when someone mentions the government, yet never has the same issue with openly advocating something that even in her words has a wrong conclusion. She should be also screaming for proof on the Terrorist Stalking book but fails to. This seems to be a double standard that she has. I would love to see the book on her credibility review site, which I feel she covertly uses to attack others, under the guise of these reviews, but she is allowed to do what she wants to.
Ms White in my opinion often leads targets in directions that I do not often agree with. I think her site has loads of useful and valuable information, but when new targets come online, I just need it to be very clear that I am not affiliated with many of her initiatives. All too often they think that all sites share the same opinions and we often do not. In distancing myself from her initiatives, I hope to move targets in more useful directions. Get them more streamlined with things that might help them.
I have been on Eleanor’s forum, things always seem to move forward, but nothing ever seems to actually get done, but she conducts them very professionally. I just feel that we often disagree in various ways and I just like that to be made clear.
The FFCHS site is currently working with John Hall and a politician on laws that I don’t think will fix the problems in the Gang Stalking community. John Hall if focusing on Satalights, which is fine, but to get to the heart of the problem, I think the local initiatives like community notifications need to be addressed. They are getting good press and it feels like things are happening, like things are going forward, but like the time they got targets to write in with information about a multiple lawsuit, I don’t think this will work any better. Thus I don’t want targets linking the two, and thinking that we all share the same ideas. Thus even when laws get passed the angle that is being taken I don’t feel will move things along the way that they need to go, in the direction that they need to go in. That is why I personally have chosen to distance myself from the direction that those initiatives have moved in.
I also had a discussion with a lawyer, who blasted all the Gang Stalking sites, and I asked why? It was because he had a disagreement with FFCHS and possibly Eleanor and thus he wrote off all the Gang Stalking sites. This really opened my eyes, and I didn’t think that was fair. So thus now, it’s made very clear that not all Gang Stalking sites share the same views. Thus if I do an initiative that they don’t agree with, they are not linked and visa versa.
I also have distanced myself from a poster who suggests that targets write a wild Freedom Of Information Act request. I do agree and fully support Freedom Of Information Act requests. I don’t support what was being suggested. Everytime certain fractions and their so called authority are challenged, character assassinations begin by their members, and those affiliated with those movements, they have a consistent habit of doing so, and thus one more reason I often choose to disassociate. Very simple really.
Lastly those fractions prefer to call this Organized Stalking, and sometime ago, I had to really fight to keep the term Gang Stalking after Eleanor decided that Organized Stalking was the term to use. She tried to have the term annexed after four years of really hard work to get the term popularized, in favor of a term most that is not as popular and would have set the movement back. Again at that time, I had to have unneeded character assassinations from some of their members, website attacks, which always happens when openly disagreeing with them. So now I am just very clear about which direction I am going in and which direction they are going in.
Some see this distancing as attacks on those sites, but it’s really just to ensure my initiatives do not affect them, and visa versa.
I hope this answers your question.
Below is an updated list of some of the signals that I have observed the informants using over the years. It’s not a complete list, but it should help get the average person started in snitch speak.
Remember the actual terms might not be exact, but this is a general gist of what they use the signals to convey. These were picked up over the last few years, on the streets. I have spent hours watching, researching.
A lot of this was picked up as I was being tortured in my home. I would go out and watch them, part of the biggest problem in the beginning was figuring out how they were communicating, how the message were being passed, how they were coordinating to harass me.
If you have read the blog, I have discussed, the fact that their is often a conductor who the snitches look to, they are also given instructions. Eg. Circle the target, they always want the target in a square. They always want to be on all four sides to feel like they are guarding the target.
Some are brilliant at passing signals, some are horrible. You learn a lot from the horrible ones. The signals are passed in different ways culturally. I have blogged about this before. When I was just watching them and learning their language it was fascinating to watch as people from this culture passed a signal in this way, vs another that way.
Eg. The squeezing the nose to indicate I understand it passed by some by putting the hand up the nose. Very gross, but very interesting. Culturally just like with any language, or variation of accents, the signals also have their own distinctions. Eg. I first saw someone of Spanish decent explaining that where they were from they used the center of the forehead, not the hand over the eyes.
I was fascinated by the fact that this must have been ongoing for some time, but I never had a clue. I was disgusted and nauseated to discover that on a daily basis most of the people around me, knew this language. It meant they were informants, citizens of the state, and thus not on my side. Still it was interesting to learn.
There is so much more to how they function, but I am disgusted by the stupidity I see. I think to understand them, you had to have some fascination or appreciation of how they functioned, I don’t think I will ever have that again, but maybe someday, someone else will.
1. Open Communication.
#Yawning and placing the hand over the mouth, or taking a drink to open communications
The most common signal that I have observed the informants using is their open communication signal.
This can be done in a variety of ways, but the most common way is to take a sip of water or drink from any container.
The open communication signal can also be conveyed via, pretending to yawn, or by putting the hand over the mouth.
They use this signal to engage other informants in the communication process.
There are other ways to pass this signal but this is the basics for now.
#Car patrols will flash their lights to open communication with foot patrols
When an informant is on foot, the cars will flash lights to open communication. In the Targeted Individual Community it was thought that this was just being used at night to annoy targets, but flashing the lights is used to identify themselves to their foot patrols.
This signal is not only used to harass targets, but it’s also their way of getting the attention of other snitches.
Eg. If an informant is not paying attention and you want to begin the open communication process you can cough, clear the throat. Then you will usually see other communication between the informants.
3. On Watch
# Rubbing or touching the eyes or corners of the eyes or placing on glasses indicating you are on watch.
This is the signal that you will see informants use most often. They will do this in a variety of ways.
The basic way of indicating this is done by placing one hand over the eyes.
You can also just rub one eye or the other.
They will use eye glasses, sun glasses, by placing them on the face it indicates the same thing.
A new way of doing this is by also rubbing the center of the forehead, where your third eye would be if you had one.
#In some cities headphone are also used to indicate that Informants are on patrol
4. I don’t understand
Pulling on the ear. Seems to indicate that the receiver has not understood what the sender has said.
5. I know.
#Briefly tapping or squeezing the nose, indicates that you understand.
You will see this quite often and it’s their way of indicating that they know, or that they understand.
# The double blink to indicate understanding etc.
If their hands are full, or they can not pass a signal any other way, this can also be used to indicate understanding.
6. At Rest
This is done by placing the hand to the side of the head. The thinking mans pose. It seems to indicate that the informants are at rest, no action is happening.
7. Stop Signalling/Communication
This is done by placing the index finger to the lips, and making a semi circle. or clasp motion. They stop communication and go silent when this signal is given.
When out in public, they brush their hair back three times, but this is done at the back of the neck not at the front. It seems to be a greeting to help identify them with each other yet again.
9. What’s happening, What’s going on.
# Brushing back the front hair 3 times
10. Directional signals.
Eg. When out in public they will often tell each other to walk left right, etc, with the nose. Eg. The index finger below the nose to the left would tell the other informant to go left. To the right would tell the other informant to go right.
They might also use these directional signal to indicate the direction of the target that is on watch, but by doing so with the eyes. (This needs confirmation)
There are more, but everytime they have fun with me, I have fun with them, and I didn’t want them to think I was a party pooper, so this way others can have fun too.
- Above top secret
- Abu Ghraib
- Active denial
- Active Denial Weapons
- as the world turns
- Asain Male
- Asian Female
- Astral Plane
- Background records checks
- bad luck
- Black female
- Black Females
- Black Male
- black women
- Brain reading device
- Britney Spears
- brown coats
- Buffy The Vampire Slayer
- changing vibrations
- Citizen Informants
- Civilian Spies
- Community harassment
- community mobbing
- community policing
- concentration camps
- constitutional change
- Controlled society
- Covert investigations
- Cultural diversity and multiculturalism
- david icke
- devinci code
- domestic spying
- East Germany
- electromagnetic frequency
- Electronic harassment
- Emotional Vampires
- False Prophets
- files updated
- Gang Stalking
- government corruption
- GPS tracking
- Guantanamo Bay
- Health and Safety
- Heath Ledger
- High technology
- Honey Trap
- Indigo Ribbon
- Informant System
- Intimate Infiltarations
- Jeremy Blake
- Joan of Ark
- John Lennon
- Kilmeer Gill
- Lord Of The Rings
- Marian Fisher
- Mark M Rich
- Markus Wolf
- Martin Luther King Jr
- Meat production
- mental concentration camps
- metropolitan police
- militarized police force
- Mind Control
- Mind Reading
- Minority women
- Naomi Ebersole
- National Security Letters
- Neurolinguistic programing
- New World Order
- one handed signals
- Online Stalking
- Passive Aggressive Manipulative
- Personal Identifiers
- Police Abuse
- Police Corruption
- Police State
- Production Company
- psychological harassment
- Quantum Physics
- Record keeping
- records updated
- Red Squads
- Robot Sentient Project
- Rosa Parks
- School Shooting
- sexual harassment
- sign language
- Skin Heads
- Social Control
- Spiritual Based Products
- Spy cameras
- spy satellites
- State target
- Stop snitching
- Targeted Individual
- The Matrix
- Theresa Duncan
- Third wave
- Thought Police
- Threat Assessment Teams
- time travel
- twilight zone
- violent persons registry
- Voice to skull
- walls of jericho
- whistle blower
- white female
- White Male
- workplace mobbing
- Young and the restless
- zero tollerance