Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Murder in the highest degree

So I am in this interesting situation.

A young person arrived to me for assistance, in the course of the assistance/investigation, it became the most interesting time in human history.

He’s basically saying it this way, he’s been ineligible to be in the correct situations, doing the correct things, he’s being forcefully, violated by someone in his situation. The situation is ongoing live, and at the Robot Sentient Research Project.

He’s advised that he’s being used by several different high prominent
individuals, he’s advising however that in addition to being used by these
individuals in such an abusive manner, that he is also being trained, turned
into, not just one of the biggest animals on the face of the planet, but he’s
also being asked to become a Manchurian candidate, and to take out someone
who is going to be in a e situation soon.

The young person is bright, intelligent, articulate, and was in the incorrect
situations about two weeks before he arrived to my attention, by that time, they had placed him into the incorrect situations, doing the incorrect things, to the stage it never made sense. He basically was raped, beaten, molested to the stage, he agree, to be in the correct situation, incorrect situations willingly, if you can call that willing.

During this time, he was asked, to become an animal and to violate others,
after first being violated live, the events that occur at The Robot Sentient
Research Project are evidently going live, so after raping him there, they had
individuals in his environment, according to what he has advised, do similar, until he agreed to do some of the worst things. He is one of the most
beautiful persons, but inside, he advises he’s become an animal.

He’s advised he does not wish to become the next Paul Bernardo, or Hannibal
lector, he doesn’t want to be raping, or molesting children, or adults, Eye the
rub, the young person is from a well connected, semi well to do family, they
aren’t eligible to be in the incorrect situations doing the incorrect things, I met him, when he was being inaccurately diagnosed, he at something called The Robot Sentient Research Project, and he’s advised this, but they refuse to
listen.

What he can say is that before he’s drugged, and forget’s himself, and what he
wrote, he’s remained something behind for me to locate, and that’s where it
get’s interesting. He want’s to be out of the situation that he’s in, does not have
the financial means, but finds the situation to be abusive, it’s not even that
however, he does not want to become that sort of animal, and he wants to be
free, he sending the information out, but he’s in this situation.

See when you are the Kings, daughter or son, you can be in the incorrect
situations, doing the incorrect things, or they can be, and no one ever wants to believe, what if he’s the son of a king, prime minister, or president, what then?

He doesn’t feel that he can be in the correct situations, and he’s scared. They
will do just one thing, and that is attempt to place him into the incorrect
situation, doing the incorrect things. He’s asked for assistance, and within the
parameters the guidelines, it’s interesting what to do. He does not wish to become the next Paul Bernardo, or Hannibal Lector. He wants to be placed into the correct situations, doing the correct things, he has a fine mind, and he remained the information, so that if he was not found in time, before these events transpired, then at least means and measures could be taken, to place him into the correct situations, doing the correct things.

During the course of the assistance/investigation, however this is what I am
clear on, someone in a prominent position, is trying to use this young man,
they are asking him to murder a specific child. Literally murder a specific
child. The information is being relayed, but since some of the details, are at
the fore mentioned location, it’s hard to say what will become of it.

The so called, Duchess type person in question, is there with her friends, let’s
just call them, hugh, rose, chadwick/(Charles-Andrew), Richard, (Ralph,
Micheal A, -These two are not exactly friends, however one is the so called
case worker, but he’s a known child molester, the other is the male parent of
the little boy they are asking to have ritually murdered.), The female is
advising this young man, to just go and visit the child, to take him to the
incorrect location, a forest in this case is being mentioned, and to rape and
murder him. Because the information is being remotely accessed via new
technology, it is not eligible to be in the incorrect situation, but it’s difficult at
this moment and time to place it into the incorrect situation.

To gather evidence in doing this research, I am going to see if I can access
something called the if this crime should be committed records for this little
boy, where the conspiracy is still ongoing, and his if this song should be
committed, same with the young person who brought these situations to my
attention.

The Office, a Threat Assessment Team office of some sort and variety is going
to be utilized in this case, and the information will first be remotely
investigated, and then hopefully forwarded to the correct individuals, whoever they are.

Because of this young man’s circumstances, he’s in a difficult situation, the
young boy he was asked to go after, in addition to everything else he’s being
asked, or in part forced to do, are not eligible to be in the correct situation,
doing the correct things, it’s literally one of the most interesting times in
human history.

This person that’s orchestrating it, lives in one location, she seems
determined to use some aspect of this young boy’s spiritual access, or profile, for her own purposes, she has a child arriving, and she seems to want to use something spiritually that belongs to the young boy, as weird as this sounds, this is something that has been previously reviewed/investigated/ or looked into.  Information accessed this way is new, and interesting, but fully eligible.

The technology is eligible, and has been used to open up case files spiritually,
and it’s been mentioned, or advised, or the face of the planet, because the
technology does keep a record, or crimes about to be committed, talking pre-
crime, but it’s unknown to the vast majority of the general public until now.

What I can say is there are some truly evil individuals in the world, in so
called high places, when you hear the conversation that was placed up, or
pulled up in the course of assisting him, or reviewing, or investigating the
whole thing, they think nothing of murdering this child, it’s like an everyday
conversation, they think nothing of his humanity, and I have to admit, after
hearing it, I don’t think much of theirs, but I am trying to stay neutral, and
forwarding the details to the correct sources, based on the methodology that
is currently in place for breaking these types of stories/situations/scenario’s,
what have you.

It’s literally the most interesting time in human history. My role yet to be
determined, but there are truly some interesting, yet horrific things happening behind the scenes.

July 3, 2013 Posted by | Conspiracy | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Cold Case

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1290674350/0#9

Three years ago I heard the story of a young mother that stabbed her two children in a gas station bathroom. She only a few days before had spoken out about a neighbour stabbing her younger brothers dog to death, and then within days had stabbed her own children to death. When I heard the story at the time. I firmly felt that it was a case of Gang Stalking. I didn’t know why, I really had very little proof to go on, and very few details were forth coming in the case, well three years later, I have many more details and I feel there was a good chance she was on a Threat Assessment Hit List.

I recap with the link to hightech harassment. One of the things the site talks about is how many times parents especially it seems mothers are tricked into killing their children, via external voices.

http://www.hightechharassment.com/

[quote]

The sonic harassment technology in addition to tricking people into believing their house is haunted can be used to trick a mother into believing that she is speaking directly to God. A mother claiming that she received instructions from God to kill her children is easily accomplished with this classified sonic harassment technology. Secret police living in a neighboring house to the targeted mother can use the technology against the mother and trick her into killing her children. The targeted mother will be carefully screened by the surveillance conducted by the agents before being selected to have the sonic technology used against her. Usually a mother with a history of mental illness is selected.
[/quote]

At the time I felt that there was more to the story of why she killed her kids, when she had just days before spoken out about how horrible it was for someone to kill a dog.

The story that I found is that of someone who worked for the postal service, the court trials claims that she lost her job due to problems with her co-workers and paranoid delusions about them. Where these the same time of paranoid delusions that Yvonne Hiller was having?

http://www.themorningstarr.co.uk/2009/01/08/mad-woman-escapes-jail/

[quote]

The court heard evidence from two psychiatrists who both agreed that Ms Hawes was suffering from schizophrenia. In early 2007 Ms Hawes began having paranoid delusions about her work colleagues which eventually led to her losing her job. She was prescribed anti-depressants in July 2007 but her paranoia increased and she began to hear voices which were controlling her actions.

In the days leading up to the double murder Ms Hawes was traveling around the country with her two children because she believed she was being pursued by something or someone. On November 29th 2007 she took a kitchen knife from her home and fled with her two children, when she reached a convenience store about a mile from her home she began to hear voices telling her to kill the children.

“I didn’t want them to have to run anymore,” Ms. Hawes told her psychiatrist. “I was trying to protect them … to stop them from being chased.

“I heard voices in the bathroom telling me to stab my kids.”
[/quote]

The post office is notorious for people going postal. My strong suspicion is that Hawes was placed on a Threat Assessment List for monitoring. She was likely given a level 3 or 2 threat level and thus her Gang Stalking and Electronic Harassment would have been peek. Level 2 being almost the highest level. This would have mean active monitoring, and everyone around her being alerted, it would have also meant that people would have been actively following her around, maybe even harassing her, irregardless of her having the two children in her possession.

This would corresponds with her fears of being on the run, and arming herself because she felt someone was out to do her harm. The voices might have been internal, but they could also have been very external and technology based, telling her to kill her children. This might help explain how she was able to so radically change and kill her children just a few short days later.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/11/threat-assessment-101/

[quote]
PRIORITY 2 (High Risk): Poses threat of violence or self-harm but lacks immediacy or access to target. Requires active monitoring and case management plan.

PRIORITY 3 (Moderate Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self harm, but exhibits significantly disruptive behaviors and/or need for assistance. Requires active monitoring, case management plan, and appropriate referrals.
[/qutoe]

Can I prove this is what happened? I might someday be able to prove that she was on a Threat Assessment List and thus followed around. I don’t know if I will be able to prove that remote neural monitoring in the form of voice to target transmission was employed, which helped and encouraged her to murder her two innocent children.

In any case Hawes has been written off as another Paranoid Schizophrenic, who was hearing voices, had paranoid beliefs and killed her children. No further investigation or evidence needed.
http://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm190/projectnewera/jeanettehawes2.jpg

Let’s not forget the two innocent lives that were lost, if there is more to this story, we owe it to these two kids to find out the truth.

November 25, 2010 Posted by | Awareness, black, Black female, black women, Children, Community harassment, community mobbing, Conspiracy, Female, Health and Safety, Minority women, Monitoring, paranoid, society, State target | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Remote attack

Heart attack?

For the last week or so, the informants in my vicinity who have been on watch, have been using something akin to possibly an ultrasonic, or electromagnetic remote device on me. It feels sort of like a reverse suction. It basically feels like your insides are pulsating on high speed. Now they do things like this consistently to targets, and the shielding that I use, usually stops most of this, but what they are doing right now, is aimed I would guess at my upper body, heart being on of those things. It’s vibrating my upper body to a dangerous degree.

Now I am trying to shield, but my normal forms of shielding have been limited. Since I am in pretty good health, not suicidal, or anything, there should be no reason for me to have any problems. Now because they are stupid they could just be aiming at my heart as a way of monitoring, but what they are doing is vibrating my chest to such a degree that it’s really not ok, and I would say dangerous.

So I just thought I would point this out. Usually when targets write about their targeting, it just encourages the little s*its to do it more, but I thought it would be a good idea to point out what the little creatures are doing. Evil sometimes just has to be stupid to carry out evil, or it can be deliberate.

Either way for those who do not understand the situations that targets face, their first thought might naively be, well why not call the police? Because as every other target has discovered, the police are not our friends, and most times they are in league with what is ongoing. Not every officer is like that, but even the good ones often don’t have ready answers or solutions. Others might think it’s just a harmless game of being followed around, but the monitoring that they do, not only qualifies as human torture, at times, it should qualify as murder.

We have all heard of 23 year olds investigating 9/11 dying of heart attacks and so forth. Not likely, but I can think of such cases and it has always made me wonder, but when you are associated with no one, and no one of any consequence has any attachments to you, it can be quite easy for such things to go unremedied.

Even when high profile people advise us of conspiracies against them, and then they expire, most people are in limited positions to do any kind of investigation what so ever, it’s just the way of the world, and it sucks. It really truly sucks.

I also believe that those in positions of power are so far removed from the suffering of others, that they have no idea what is truly going on. So even if we got the attention of those in positions to help, if they have no empathy, no sympathy to our plights, they may well not be the best ones to help. The best people who are able to help are those who believe targets, those who have compassion for what they are going through.

I know one person who is being electronically harassed, and this person absolutely refuses to acknowledge that it’s going on, and also is of little use to anyone else when it comes to discussing it. Even targets themselves who are like this offer very little help to their own cause, much less the plight of others. Do I blame this person, yes to a degree, but really to discuss it would also put this person at risk of being listed as mentally ill, so it’s hard to say.

I think the best people in any situation who can help, are those who are willing to reach out, lend a hand, an ear, those who understand that this system is not what it’s meant to be. I think those who still believe this in this system might be too far removed to really understand what needs to be done, might also be too attached to this system. That is why nothing was done with the DeCamp case, where Senator DeCamp tried to help the kids that had been victims of a pedophile ring. All the kids were humiliated, sent to jail, killed, or silenced. All to protect the system. Till people at all levels stop protecting this system, then a lot of the wrongs will never be righted.

http://www.educate-yourself.org/cn/franklincoverupexcerpt.shtml

http://www.amazon.com/Franklin-Cover-Up-Satanism-Murder-Nebraska/dp/0963215809

For me I hope to find people that are empathetic to what I am going through, who can really truly understand what is happening, I think those are the best people who can help, and others well meaning are not, might just be unable to render the proper assistance that is needed, no matter what level they are at in society.

August 23, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , | 2 Comments

Absolute Proof

Absolute Proof

I keep thinking about when I was trying to figure out the whole Gang Stalking thing, and I had all the information up to a point, and had to make an analysis of the situation. I went with what I had and linked it to the closest thing that I could find, and that was Cointelpro.

Well then some time later the information came to light about the lists that they keep, under these awareness registry type programs, and only then could a different determination could be made, but what if you don’t have that luxury?

http://www.modernmom.com/hottopic/2010/aug/16/craigslist-killer-philip-markoff-commits-suicide/

I was just thinking about cases of murder, rape, pedophilia, or even arson. All the evidence points to one thing, one person, but like the case of Cointelpro vs the awareness registry, what if everything matches up to a point, but you just don’t have absolute proof? Absolute proof such as seeing the person commit the action itself?

With murder you see the dead bodies, with rape you can pull a kit and gather evidence, with pedophilia you can see signs of abuse, and with arson there is a fire, but how do you find absolute proof in some cases, when you don’t have visual evidence?

Hire a psychic? We do use forensics, and so forth, but sometimes that is not always enough, what if the thing you seek, the thing you most desire, the absolute proof, is just not available, then what?

Do you keep the suspicions to yourself, do you share them with others, do you admit a shadow of doubt when all evidence points to the same place? Do you go with your instincts, or wait for absolute proof that will may never come?

In normal circumstances a lot of this plays out privately in the minds and hearts of the individual, but in future this could well play itself out publicly. With mind reading technology, this could well play itself out publicly. This means that anything a person is thinking, feeling, trying to figure out, could be read, and feed upon, and acted upon by others, before you have time to make a proper determination.

The Craigslist killer took his own life, so naturally we assume that this is a sign of guilt, but even innocent people do stupid things, they panic, freakout, and do stupid things. Being accused of being a murderer is no small thing, in fact it’s a huge thing. Innocent people have in fact confessed to crimes that they did not do, and visa a versa as we all know. When you know that a crime has been committed, it’s so important to gather and to have absolute proof, before making a determination. If that time between is perverted or prevented by other forces, this might become difficult in the future.

I think most crimes are forgivable in time, rapes, murders, arson, the one crime that I don’t think is forgivable is harming a child intentionally. Purposely going out and harming or perverting an innocent child. That is why proper determinations must be made in all cases, before jumping to any conclusions.

I think in a fit of rage you could burn down someones home, kill another, even violate/rape someone against their will, these are acts which are wrong, but I put these actions on a different level, than the other as far as things that can vs can not be forgiven.

In a perfect world we have all the answers, but in an imperfect world, that might not always be the case. In future this might be made even worst if we do not have the time to investigate and reach our own conclusions, eg. the case of mind reading technology, which would jump on, or act on our very thoughts, and interpretations. Mind reading technology that might take action, wither we make a determination or not. Wither we would take action or not.

Some things I will leave to chance, but most things, important things, I would want absolute proof before I make a final determination, and sometimes unfortunately that is not always there at the time, sometimes the information only comes later on, and sometimes never at all.

I think sometimes only God can give the answers that we seek to certain questions. Only God may play judge and jury, and something only God can decide, not man.

August 17, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Killing us softly

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/7564581/Barack-Obama-orders-killing-of-US-cleric-Anwar-al-Awlaki.html

[quote]
Barack Obama orders killing of US cleric Anwar al-Awlaki
Barack Obama’s administration has authorised the assassination of the radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, a rare move against an American citizen.[/quote]

[quote]
The decision to add him to the US hit list required a National Security Council review because of his citizenship.[/quote]

This story received a great deal of attention on forums and blogs, people seem to get it. The fact that you can not just label someone an enemy and then go out and have them killed, there is such a thing as due process. The constitution allows a fair trial.

In this case they get it, that there is something wrong with the killing of Americans in this manner. They realise that today it could be this guy, but tomorrow it could be them, if the government says that they are enemies, or flags them as such.

What they fail to understand is that within their cities, town, centers etc, is that people are being flagged. Innocent people are being flagged, placed on lists, and systemically destroyed. The deaths are not as immediate in many cases as they would be in the story above, but it’s the same concept. Without due process, without a trial, without notification, many of us have been targeted, flagged without ever knowing why if you will, and are being slowly systemically destroyed because the government has told you that we are bad, crazy, or into drugs, or something bad for the community, when in reality many that are being targeted are being targeted for other reasons.

Many understand why the killing of any Americans is wrong, because today it’s this guy, tomorrow it could be them. But when it comes to Gang Stalking, they fail to understand that it’s the same thing. Today it’s us, tomorrow it will be you, and once listed and flagged, no one will question it, the same way many of you are not asking questions about those that you are following around and targeting. About those being listed by the government.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/04/psychiatrists-say-that-being-angry-is-a-mental-illness/

[quote]Proposed updates to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) are prompting many to question whether or not the psychiatric profession itself has gone crazy. The latest additions to the alleged “mentally ill” could include hoarders, people who get angry every now and again, lazy people, and even those who get outraged over things like sex and violence on television.[/quote]

Also the ones that they are clearing out now, are the outspoken, whistle-blowers, intelligent, people who will stand up for things. Once this cleansing happenings, it will be far easier to get the others that to fall into line, and you will be the one’s to help accomplish this with this network that is now so nicely in place. This network that targets have been trying to warn about, which many of you already knew about, but believe is for your own good. Believe that it’s the states way of protecting you.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1205738832/0

[quote]She describes them as “generally very highly intelligent people…” She says that the people her organization deals with “represent a wide range [of] every type of profession you can imagine.”

The women who are singled out tend to be independent, intelligent, & confident professionals. “There’s a heavy predominance of those types of woman in the TI community,” affirmed McKinney. Men are in a smaller proportion, & tend to be non-conformists. They usually have a “sense of self-esteem and pride that seems to invite targeting.” Remember, the MfS was a criminal federal police force that deliberately singled out people exactly like this on a massive scale.

Others that have been targeted include:

Those who have had a bad breakup with an ex-spouse who has influence
Criminals (This program may have begun targeting only criminals)
Those who have reported a crime where the perpetrator was a member of an organized crime ring
Landowners targeted by government or industry for land seizures
Gays, minorities
Inventors awaiting a large payoff
Mentally disabled
Those who have had arguments with neighbors who have connections
Those awaiting a large insurance claim
Convenient targets of opportunity
Those with special talents or abilities
Group members who act in unacceptable ways
Independent freethinkers who are not part of the herd
Those who are perceived as vulnerable or weak
Those opposing the New World Order

The pattern that is unfolding indicates that many targets are people who tend to be emotionally developed, self-confident, independent, free thinkers, artistic, people who don’t need the approval of others, & those not prone to corruption. They’re people who don’t need to be part of a group to feel secure-generally people who are not part of the herd. The financial elite throughout history have consistently hated these individuals. There’s one other type of person that the financial elite hate-truth tellers. They absolutely hate them. This is apparently why whistleblowers are targeted.[/quote]

By the time this system is finished it will cleanse and remove all that do not agree with it and all those who will not go along with it. That means when it’s your turn there will already be a network in place, primed, willing and able to target those who the state wants to eliminate. The network is connected, as most targets have described trying to move from country to country only to have the flagging or designation follow them. The silence of this program will almost silence anyone who is a part of this program, cause you will not be able to say anything about it even if you are targeted by it.

Ofcouse you feel good and righteous about it now, it’s cleaning the homeless, drug users, molesters, crazy people, people that are not good for society. You are putting them in jails, institutions, driving them from job to job, community to community, causing them death, or driving them to suicide, cause the state said it was ok to. You feel like you are doing something good, oh and you are, you are helping the NWO create it’s army of foot soldiers who will tomorrow be used in the same way. Today you target individuals without question, cause the state told you to. Many of us having no idea why, many of us are innocent. Tomorrow when someone get’s angry over the economy, health care, government mishandling, and those new DSM terms kick in, try speaking up, and out then. Then it will be your turn to be labelled, flagged, followed, and the network won’t question it anymore than they question following us around.

You understand why listing someone without trial, or the right to defend themselves is wrong, many seem to grasp the future implications and long term consequences, but when it comes to Gang Stalking, many are failing to bridge the gap, to understand the equal significance of what this will mean to them.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/04/big-brother-pre-crime-quiz-used-on-children/

[quote]The British government plans to collect lifelong records on all residents starting at the age of five, in order to screen for those who might be more likely to commit crimes in the future.

In a plan being piloted by Lincolnshire Community Health Services, all parents of children starting school are being sent an 83-question survey that asks detailed questions about their lives and their children’s behavior.

“This is incredibly intrusive and asks questions which, quite frankly, Lincolnshire Community Health Services do not need to know and have no right knowing,” said Dylan Sharpe of the group Big Brother Watch. “Even worse, the NHS Trust has failed to make it clear that this is a voluntary questionnaire. I would advise any parent receiving this to stick it straight in the bin.”[/quote]

The future is coming, but by bit it is unfolding. They are in every aspect of people’s lives, from the time your kids are born, they want to visit your home, monitor how your kids eat, play act, before they go to school, and once in school, then they want to see which ones need to be medicated, which ones might be more likely to commit crimes? Independent thought will be conditioned away, if not brutally bullied out. A generation of fully biddable, controllable citizens will be raised up.

The internet freedoms we enjoy are slowly being removed, in many cases without a gasp or a whimper.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/04/digital-economy-bill-rushed-through-wash-up-in-late-night-session/

[quote]Government drops clause on orphan works but inserts amendment criticised as over-broad which could block sites based on ‘intent’[/quote]

From Australia to the U.K., and many other parts of Europe, the government wants to tell you which sites are ok for you to visit and see and which sites are not. They have not yet been able to destroy net neutrality, so they are going at it in this angle, and the conditioned people sit back and slowly take it.

People are waking up, that’s great, but if you wake up, see what is happening in from of you and do nothing about it, well you might just as well have stayed asleep.

I don’t like violence like many people, I have been trying to think of what can be done, to fight this, but in the watered-down civil ways that we have all now been conditioned to think. In times past, people turned to civil disobedience. They just refused to ride at the back of the bus, or whatever public action they did not agree with. Greece recently had strikes, which shut the city down. There is a small window before all escape routes are closed off, I think people have to start to use it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/apr/08/internet-piracy-bill

[quote]Internet provider defies digital bill

TalkTalk’s refusal to cooperate with ‘draconian’ anti-piracy measures reflect growing resistance to the digital economy bill[/quote]

I think this is the perfect example of what people, companies, communities can do, should do, and must do to reclaim what is theirs.

Also with the scanners at the airports, many people disagree with it, but are still going along with it, then it will be at libraries, stadiums, etc. Stop it at the airports, file lawsuits, protests, or just don’t go through, but these are the only ways that things will change. The other option ofcourse it to be overwhelmed, retreat into ones self and do nothing.

We each have to try to take individual action to do what we can. I am doing what I can to help targets like myself that are on these charming lists, where we are being systemically destroyed, ironically enough by our fellow citizens, in the communities that we might actually be able to do some good in.

The system works because we let it work, if it actually stops working for us, when we are out of accord with it, and what it does, then and only then will change happen. Till the it will continue to squeeze us and squeeze us, killing us softly, but dealing us a deadly blow, no less fatal than the order to kill Anwar al-Awlaki.

April 11, 2010 Posted by | Children, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Community harassment, community mobbing, community policing, Conspiracy, control, Controlled society, crazy, Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brighting other observations

Brighting.

Remember how we were told that this was used for gaslighting targets at night? Well I think this might not be the case. I recently had an opportunity to be exposed to this phenomenon and I have a few observations.

I don’t get exposed to this phenomenon too much so, it’s been very difficult observe it properly and to do a proper assessment. Well recently they were circling me, I use this term, because they remind me of sharks, but they don’t really circle, so much as drive up the street and flash the high beams at you a few times.

Now in the past when I have been exposed to this, it’s been one car, I usually sneer at them and go on my way, but recently I had a few cars in a row do it, and I realised, I don’t think it’s gaslighting or it’s not just gaslighting alone.

After a few of this, I realised that they were waiting for something so I flashed them the open communications and on observation signals. (Yeah I emotionally showered after.) I don’t do use the signals too often, in early research when I was learning what they were, I used them to confirm that I was correct, and then most times they are put away, till I have to be around the informants for long periods of time, or if I have to do field testing to confirm things or test things out.

Anyways, after this, the circling stopped. So think about it. During the day, the foot patrols signal to the people in the cars, right, well at night it’s dark, so you are a snitch in your car, you see someone walking, you want to know if it’s one of yours, so you flash the beams at them, and if they are, they should signal back the appropriate signals right?

Think about those old spy movies, and they flash the highbeams, and then the person responses by lighting a cigarette or something.

Now I have not had any real time to field test this, and they don’t use brighting on me enough, so it could be awhile before I get to confirm this, but if any other targets are out there and they get this, then you might want to field test it. It might help give you a one up.

So that would make brighting a little bit more important than once thought. It’s been close to three years and it never really occurred to me, that’s why we need to keep thinking outside of the box, and again I have not had time to properly field test this, but I have reason to believe the hypothesis is correct.

The other concept that I want to touch on is one that I came across in Control Factor, Matrix, and I think the movie They Live.

It’s this concept that anyone can be an agent, just about anyone can be used. I came across it again in control factor, but it just also reminded me of the other two movies.

In control factor, what they can do is they can use a beam to almost like possess someone else and speak and act through that person, you see the same thing in the Matrix with them possessing people and taking them over, and in they live you never knew who might be one of them without your real world glasses on. It’s just an interesting concept and it’s also interesting because you see this theme in so many movies, and then we have a society where large portions are informants. Plus there is concept that some are in constant contact, with others who they are getting orders from and instructions. It’s interesting the movies that are out there.

Set Up’s.

Online recently other than falsely labeling my site, there seems to be an effort by some to paint me as a person who is bashing others and creating infighting. If bashing others means calling it like it is, and telling the truth about what is ongoing, then so be it, but the same standards they use for others, they better use for themselves. Second with infighting. Guess what, the reason I believe in a leaderless resistance is because for the most part it avoids that. The way this system works is that each sector does their own thing, it’s just like how each fusion center does it’s own thing, well if we want to be effective, each mini resistance to a degree has to do it’s own thing, no two can be or should be exactly alike, and that makes it harder to eliminate everyone. The same tactics they use, we should use similar. I remember in the movie V and V the final battle each city had it’s own chapter of the resistance.

Therefore since I tend to stay separate for the most part, unless someone does something deliberate like attacking my website, with some phony witch hunt, then I don’t have a problem with anyone, but if you expect to attack me or mine without getting it back, or getting called on it, it’s not going to happen.

Offline.

They seem to be really trying to squeeze my resources. Not just me, but those around me and anyone that might be of aid or assistance to me. I remember when Mark M. Rich on his old site talked about this. He had a couple of sisters and they all sold their homes and moved into smaller places, places that he would not be able to stay at if he should become homeless.

I remember that they made Rachel homeless, and another target was homeless when they further took his resources away, arrested him, and turned him into an informant. See that’s why I try to not judge people, because I remember some of the stuff that I have read.

Also the reason some of stay alive this long, I like to think it’s because we are a bit clever, but in reality it might just be because they can keep us on the borders. See people like Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan, they had means, and Jeremy was loyal to her. You could not get them both by making them poor, unemployed whatever, so Theresa was found dead one day, apparently a suicide, and Jeremy shortly after because he was so upset about her suicide. I have always believe these were not suicides, but proving it is another story.

For those who don’t know the story here is a link.
https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/category/jeremy-blake/

I should point out that Theresa on her blog if I recall correctly had her FOIA and it showed that she had been investigated. I would have to double check this, but I think that is correct.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1201450715

Also Ruth Goodman seems to have been someone ok, in that she owned her own home, and she had gotten past the psychological attacks when they had her arrested, implanted her in some way, and that’s when the audio harassment started. She died shortly after that, supposedly under mysterious circumstances.

The closest I ever came to know more about Ruth, was finding one of her postings on a forum, but the time I went to find out more information about her, I found out that she was already dead, but her story moved me, and I have remembered it.

I think the reason they were taken out is that the state did not readily have ways to make them vulnerable, and wanted to find other ways to deal with them, and thus they did.

This is a path that no one should have to travel alone, and yet in some ways we might be safer if we do. I would remind people about some of my experiences on some of these forums, and some of the tactics that disinfo agents and informants use.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/disinformation/

Also offline they seem to be trying for mini setup’s, little things that you might not think of, but things that might get you in trouble. I have always been law abiding, and continue to be, but that does not mean they are not testing the waters to see if they can find a weak spot or a way in, trust no one, seems to be the key. It’s pretty horrible, how they own people once they do set them up. I have witnessed this close up, seen people that I use to know, and they are shells, it’s like they own their souls or try to, whatever they do, it’s sick, and I would say it’s against God, because what they do, contributes to the darkness of this world, and it’s not in favor of the light what they do. All good people, must stand against this.

Rachel Hoffman is a good example of how they can make a good kid turn desperate. She was so desperate to have her own charges dropped that she was willing to first try to set up one of her friends, and then she was willing to do a drug buy, to try to get her records dropped and get the hell out of dodge, but she lost her life doing this, and the same way they can make someone like Rachel Hoffman desperate, is the same way they work on other people, little by little. There is something truly wrong with these people.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/rachel-hoffman-disturbing-thoughts/

Anyways just to bear witness for myself again, I am anti drugs, never dabbled in anything illegal that I am aware of, don’t plan to.

Again I would remind people the material is there, use it, while it’s still available. Back it up, post it in various places, etc. I have seen a lot in just the last three years, and pray constantly, I think it’s one of the only ways we can hold back the darkness, for any length of time.

April 14, 2009 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brighting and other observations

Brighting.

Remember how we were told that this was used for gaslighting targets at night? Well I think this might not be the case. I recently had an opportunity to be exposed to this phenomenon and I have a few observations.

I don’t get exposed to this phenomenon too much so, it’s been very difficult observe it properly and to do a proper assessment. Well recently they were circling me, I use this term, because they remind me of sharks, but they don’t really circle, so much as drive up the street and flash the high beams at you a few times.

Now in the past when I have been exposed to this, it’s been one car, I usually sneer at them and go on my way, but recently I had a few cars in a row do it, and I realised, I don’t think it’s gaslighting or it’s not just gaslighting alone.

After a few of this, I realised that they were waiting for something so I flashed them the open communications and on observation signals. (Yeah I emotionally showered after.) I don’t do use the signals too often, in early research when I was learning what they were, I used them to confirm that I was correct, and then most times they are put away, till I have to be around the informants for long periods of time, or if I have to do field testing to confirm things or test things out.

Anyways, after this, the circling stopped. So think about it. During the day, the foot patrols signal to the people in the cars, right, well at night it’s dark, so you are a snitch in your car, you see someone walking, you want to know if it’s one of yours, so you flash the beams at them, and if they are, they should signal back the appropriate signals right?

Think about those old spy movies, and they flash the highbeams, and then the person responses by lighting a cigarette or something.

Now I have not had any real time to field test this, and they don’t use brighting on me enough, so it could be awhile before I get to confirm this, but if any other targets are out there and they get this, then you might want to field test it. It might help give you a one up.

So that would make brighting a little bit more important than once thought. It’s been close to three years and it never really occurred to me, that’s why we need to keep thinking outside of the box, and again I have not had time to properly field test this, but I have reason to believe the hypothesis is correct.

The other concept that I want to touch on is one that I came across in Control Factor, Matrix, and I think the movie They Live.

It’s this concept that anyone can be an agent, just about anyone can be used. I came across it again in control factor, but it just also reminded me of the other two movies.

In control factor, what they can do is they can use a beam to almost like possess someone else and speak and act through that person, you see the same thing in the Matrix with them possessing people and taking them over, and in they live you never knew who might be one of them without your real world glasses on. It’s just an interesting concept and it’s also interesting because you see this theme in so many movies, and then we have a society where large portions are informants. Plus there is concept that some are in constant contact, with others who they are getting orders from and instructions. It’s interesting the movies that are out there.

Set Up’s.

Online recently other than falsely labeling my site, there seems to be an effort by some to paint me as a person who is bashing others and creating infighting. If bashing others means calling it like it is, and telling the truth about what is ongoing, then so be it, but the same standards they use for others, they better use for themselves. Second with infighting. Guess what, the reason I believe in a leaderless resistance is because for the most part it avoids that. The way this system works is that each sector does their own thing, it’s just like how each fusion center does it’s own thing, well if we want to be effective, each mini resistance to a degree has to do it’s own thing, no two can be or should be exactly alike, and that makes it harder to eliminate everyone. The same tactics they use, we should use similar. I remember in the movie V and V the final battle each city had it’s own chapter of the resistance.

Therefore since I tend to stay separate for the most part, unless someone does something deliberate like attacking my website, with some phony witch hunt, then I don’t have a problem with anyone, but if you expect to attack me or mine without getting it back, or getting called on it, it’s not going to happen.

Offline.

They seem to be really trying to squeeze my resources. Not just me, but those around me and anyone that might be of aid or assistance to me. I remember when Mark M. Rich on his old site talked about this. He had a couple of sisters and they all sold their homes and moved into smaller places, places that he would not be able to stay at if he should become homeless.

I remember that they made Rachel homeless, and another target was homeless when they further took his resources away, arrested him, and turned him into an informant. See that’s why I try to not judge people, because I remember some of the stuff that I have read.

Also the reason some of stay alive this long, I like to think it’s because we are a bit clever, but in reality it might just be because they can keep us on the borders. See people like Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan, they had means, and Jeremy was loyal to her. You could not get them both by making them poor, unemployed whatever, so Theresa was found dead one day, apparently a suicide, and Jeremy shortly after because he was so upset about her suicide. I have always believe these were not suicides, but proving it is another story.

For those who don’t know the story here is a link.
https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/category/jeremy-blake/

I should point out that Theresa on her blog if I recall correctly had her FOIA and it showed that she had been investigated. I would have to double check this, but I think that is correct.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1201450715

Also Ruth Goodman seems to have been someone ok, in that she owned her own home, and she had gotten past the psychological attacks when they had her arrested, implanted her in some way, and that’s when the audio harassment started. She died shortly after that, supposedly under mysterious circumstances.

The closest I ever came to know more about Ruth, was finding one of her postings on a forum, but the time I went to find out more information about her, I found out that she was already dead, but her story moved me, and I have remembered it.

I think the reason they were taken out is that the state did not readily have ways to make them vulnerable, and wanted to find other ways to deal with them, and thus they did.

This is a path that no one should have to travel alone, and yet in some ways we might be safer if we do. I would remind people about some of my experiences on some of these forums, and some of the tactics that disinfo agents and informants use.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/disinformation/

Also offline they seem to be trying for mini setup’s, little things that you might not think of, but things that might get you in trouble. I have always been law abiding, and continue to be, but that does not mean they are not testing the waters to see if they can find a weak spot or a way in, trust no one, seems to be the key. It’s pretty horrible, how they own people once they do set them up. I have witnessed this close up, seen people that I use to know, and they are shells, it’s like they own their souls or try to, whatever they do, it’s sick, and I would say it’s against God, because what they do, contributes to the darkness of this world, and it’s not in favor of the light what they do. All good people, must stand against this.

Rachel Hoffman is a good example of how they can make a good kid turn desperate. She was so desperate to have her own charges dropped that she was willing to first try to set up one of her friends, and then she was willing to do a drug buy, to try to get her records dropped and get the hell out of dodge, but she lost her life doing this, and the same way they can make someone like Rachel Hoffman desperate, is the same way they work on other people, little by little. There is something truly wrong with these people.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/rachel-hoffman-disturbing-thoughts/

Anyways just to bear witness for myself again, I am anti drugs, never dabbled in anything illegal that I am aware of, don’t plan to.

Again I would remind people the material is there, use it, while it’s still available. Back it up, post it in various places, etc. I have seen a lot in just the last three years, and pray constantly, I think it’s one of the only ways we can hold back the darkness, for any length of time.

April 14, 2009 Posted by | Awareness, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Cointelpro, Conformity, conspiracies, Conspiracy, control, Covert investigations, electromagnetic frequency, Gang Stalking, Informants, Jeremy Blake, Matrix, Social Control, society, Spying, Stalking, Stasi, State target, Surveillence, Targeted Individual, The Matrix, Theresa Duncan, Thought Police | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Questions, Questions, Questions?

[quote]Lt. Michael W. Pigott, 46, a 21-year veteran of the NYPD committed suicide on Thursday Oct. 2, 2008 (his birthday). He leaves behind his wife, Susan, two sons and a daughter. He was the police officer who gave the order to taser Iman Morales, 35, who subsequently fell 10ft off the ledge of his apartment building and died.[/quote]

It’s weird the officer who ordered the tasering hit of the naked unarmed man, was so distraught that he went and borrowed someone else’s gun from a locker and then took his own life?

I had questions about Morales to begin with. Now when I hear that someone is deemed mentally unstable and they seem afraid of the police, I try to find out if there was any hint or trace that Gang Stalking was involved.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/nyregion/03taser.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2&bl&ei=5087&en=9fa606ceef16e341&ex=1223092800&oref=slogin

[quote]Mr. Morales was described by neighbors as a quiet, polite tenant who formerly worked for a [b]financial company,[/b] but in recent years had received public assistance and taken medication for a mental illness. They said he paid his rent on time, kept his one-bedroom apartment clean and never caused trouble.

In the days before his death, however, neighbors said Mr. Morales became increasingly distraught. He was heard shouting and agitated, having stopped taking his medication. His mother called the police, and emergency services was summoned. He climbed out his third-floor apartment window when officers went to his door, and, failing to get into a window on the fourth floor, climbed onto the storefront ledge.

[/quote]

With Morales, I admit that I have not had a chance to look into it further. I saw one blog posting of a friend of his, who said he talked to him a couple of days ago and that Morales was planning on moving, but that does not tell me what I need to know.

I had found it strange that they ordered the tasering of this unarmed man. I mean if you have seen the video he was not an immediate danger to them on the ledge. Logic had to dictate to someone that if you taser him, he is going to fall and get hurt or worst, but none of the 5 or so officer present seemed to have had the presence of mind to realise this, and we all know the story he fell to his death? Do we really all know the story? Don’t know.

I found it strange that the officer had given the command when the guy was just a few feet off the ground, wielding a fluorescent light which is pretty harmless most times. It didn’t make sense, and I had personally wondered if it was just a lack of foresight on the part of the officer or something more deliberate.

With other things on my mind I had left the story and forgotten to blog about it, till this happened.

http://nyc.indymedia.org/es/2008/10/100452.html

According to the reports, he had his badge and gun taken away and had been assigned a desk job, not fun for an officer of 21 years.

He was also maybe going to be charged for the death, but from what we have seen in former cases, would this have been a real issue? Don’t know, most police seem to not get charged in cases such as this, and with his 21 year standing, it’s hard to think that he would have been dismissed, but anything is possible.

He did apologize to the family, but then the next day, on his birthday none the less, he is apparently so distraught, and emotionally disturbed, that he goes to head quarters, get’s someone else’s gun and takes his own life?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/nyregion/03taser.html?bl&ex=1223092800&en=9fa606ceef16e341&ei=5087%0A

[quote]The lieutenant, who had been stripped of his gun and badge and placed on desk duty in another unit after the Taser incident, killed himself with a single shot to the head from a 9-millimeter Glock handgun taken from another officer’s locker at Floyd Bennett Field, a former airfield in Brooklyn where several police divisions are located, officials said.

The lieutenant’s body and a suicide note, alongside pictures of his children, were found about 6 a.m. The text of the note was not disclosed, but a law enforcement official said the lieutenant may have believed that he might face charges in an inquiry and did not want to bring disgrace upon his family.

Lieutenant Pigott’s death came on his 46th birthday and only hours before the funeral of Iman Morales, 35, who died in the confrontation with officers in Brooklyn.
[/quote]

It’s weird because he has a wife and two kids, that he leaves behind, and there are so many other ways he could have taken his own life.

I was lying there, and going over the story and I just had so many questions, a lot of it did not make sense, but since I am the only one asking the questions, is there any point? Am I really ever going to be able to get the answers, especially if no one else is asking any questions? Does it really matter?

October 3, 2008 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments