Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Murder in the highest degree

So I am in this interesting situation.

A young person arrived to me for assistance, in the course of the assistance/investigation, it became the most interesting time in human history.

He’s basically saying it this way, he’s been ineligible to be in the correct situations, doing the correct things, he’s being forcefully, violated by someone in his situation. The situation is ongoing live, and at the Robot Sentient Research Project.

He’s advised that he’s being used by several different high prominent
individuals, he’s advising however that in addition to being used by these
individuals in such an abusive manner, that he is also being trained, turned
into, not just one of the biggest animals on the face of the planet, but he’s
also being asked to become a Manchurian candidate, and to take out someone
who is going to be in a e situation soon.

The young person is bright, intelligent, articulate, and was in the incorrect
situations about two weeks before he arrived to my attention, by that time, they had placed him into the incorrect situations, doing the incorrect things, to the stage it never made sense. He basically was raped, beaten, molested to the stage, he agree, to be in the correct situation, incorrect situations willingly, if you can call that willing.

During this time, he was asked, to become an animal and to violate others,
after first being violated live, the events that occur at The Robot Sentient
Research Project are evidently going live, so after raping him there, they had
individuals in his environment, according to what he has advised, do similar, until he agreed to do some of the worst things. He is one of the most
beautiful persons, but inside, he advises he’s become an animal.

He’s advised he does not wish to become the next Paul Bernardo, or Hannibal
lector, he doesn’t want to be raping, or molesting children, or adults, Eye the
rub, the young person is from a well connected, semi well to do family, they
aren’t eligible to be in the incorrect situations doing the incorrect things, I met him, when he was being inaccurately diagnosed, he at something called The Robot Sentient Research Project, and he’s advised this, but they refuse to
listen.

What he can say is that before he’s drugged, and forget’s himself, and what he
wrote, he’s remained something behind for me to locate, and that’s where it
get’s interesting. He want’s to be out of the situation that he’s in, does not have
the financial means, but finds the situation to be abusive, it’s not even that
however, he does not want to become that sort of animal, and he wants to be
free, he sending the information out, but he’s in this situation.

See when you are the Kings, daughter or son, you can be in the incorrect
situations, doing the incorrect things, or they can be, and no one ever wants to believe, what if he’s the son of a king, prime minister, or president, what then?

He doesn’t feel that he can be in the correct situations, and he’s scared. They
will do just one thing, and that is attempt to place him into the incorrect
situation, doing the incorrect things. He’s asked for assistance, and within the
parameters the guidelines, it’s interesting what to do. He does not wish to become the next Paul Bernardo, or Hannibal Lector. He wants to be placed into the correct situations, doing the correct things, he has a fine mind, and he remained the information, so that if he was not found in time, before these events transpired, then at least means and measures could be taken, to place him into the correct situations, doing the correct things.

During the course of the assistance/investigation, however this is what I am
clear on, someone in a prominent position, is trying to use this young man,
they are asking him to murder a specific child. Literally murder a specific
child. The information is being relayed, but since some of the details, are at
the fore mentioned location, it’s hard to say what will become of it.

The so called, Duchess type person in question, is there with her friends, let’s
just call them, hugh, rose, chadwick/(Charles-Andrew), Richard, (Ralph,
Micheal A, -These two are not exactly friends, however one is the so called
case worker, but he’s a known child molester, the other is the male parent of
the little boy they are asking to have ritually murdered.), The female is
advising this young man, to just go and visit the child, to take him to the
incorrect location, a forest in this case is being mentioned, and to rape and
murder him. Because the information is being remotely accessed via new
technology, it is not eligible to be in the incorrect situation, but it’s difficult at
this moment and time to place it into the incorrect situation.

To gather evidence in doing this research, I am going to see if I can access
something called the if this crime should be committed records for this little
boy, where the conspiracy is still ongoing, and his if this song should be
committed, same with the young person who brought these situations to my
attention.

The Office, a Threat Assessment Team office of some sort and variety is going
to be utilized in this case, and the information will first be remotely
investigated, and then hopefully forwarded to the correct individuals, whoever they are.

Because of this young man’s circumstances, he’s in a difficult situation, the
young boy he was asked to go after, in addition to everything else he’s being
asked, or in part forced to do, are not eligible to be in the correct situation,
doing the correct things, it’s literally one of the most interesting times in
human history.

This person that’s orchestrating it, lives in one location, she seems
determined to use some aspect of this young boy’s spiritual access, or profile, for her own purposes, she has a child arriving, and she seems to want to use something spiritually that belongs to the young boy, as weird as this sounds, this is something that has been previously reviewed/investigated/ or looked into.  Information accessed this way is new, and interesting, but fully eligible.

The technology is eligible, and has been used to open up case files spiritually,
and it’s been mentioned, or advised, or the face of the planet, because the
technology does keep a record, or crimes about to be committed, talking pre-
crime, but it’s unknown to the vast majority of the general public until now.

What I can say is there are some truly evil individuals in the world, in so
called high places, when you hear the conversation that was placed up, or
pulled up in the course of assisting him, or reviewing, or investigating the
whole thing, they think nothing of murdering this child, it’s like an everyday
conversation, they think nothing of his humanity, and I have to admit, after
hearing it, I don’t think much of theirs, but I am trying to stay neutral, and
forwarding the details to the correct sources, based on the methodology that
is currently in place for breaking these types of stories/situations/scenario’s,
what have you.

It’s literally the most interesting time in human history. My role yet to be
determined, but there are truly some interesting, yet horrific things happening behind the scenes.

July 3, 2013 Posted by | Conspiracy | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Conspiracy & Indictment

Conspiracy & Indictment

I think we really need to go after those on the informant system that are systemically destroying innocent lives. I really want to see them at every level be held accountable. I don’t care if it’s close relatives, co-workers, community workers etc., those taking instructions knowing from an informant system, that gives them instructions to systemically remove someone from their outcomes should be billed as a conspiracy, and dealt with and handled the exact same way.

A Conspiracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_%28crime%29

In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act must also have been undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offence). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability but may reduce their sentence.

Therefore if the individuals in your life are taking additional instructions to get into argument, physically get into altercations, say things of an untrue nature that might adversely effect the individual, they are part of a conspiracy, and ever increasingly in most countries, that is punishable by the law.

The informant class and what they do, the lies they tell, the incidents they cause are nothing but conspiracy. Most targets go after them at a community level, but what should also be done is a review of the series of discussion, and conversations that go on with these individuals, and the local monitoring units.

Most of these individuals are on the informant system, most have records, many are will to do the worst things to an innocent person. Any plot outside of the normal guidelines of the Threat Assessment Files, need to now be reviewed a little closer. These incidents are not harmless, these instructions these individuals are being given, to act out, and act upon are life ruining, systemic destruction of the individuals. They are nothing but problematic, and they need to be reviewed, very carefully. These instructions that they often get, from the local monitoring teams, their informant handlers, or whoever is in contact with them are life destroying, and they are pre-planned, thus conspiracy, and I want to see the community move forward with looking into this angle and aspect of it.

Chief of police, -or informant handler, or local monitoring unit, a typical kind of conversation they might have with someone close to the target, Now Jamie this is what I want you to do, the next time you are in a situation with this guy, I want you to set him up, I want you to make him look crazy, start saying a bunch of shit, like but your’ acting weird today eh, your seem strange, your’ making me uncomfortable, try to get him irritated, so that he can get into an argument with you, or act out, if he hits you even better, and just document all this stuff, even if it’s not the actual thing.

Jamie:

He’s clear they are setting the guy up, but he’s clear it’s the police, or his informant handler, or the local monitoring units asking this, and as per his parole, he is required to now be a part of the informant system, and that is what he is agreeing to, he is clear that this is dirty, but he’s clear that he being used and utilized in this capacity.

Wither Jamie is clear that the chief, the handler, or the local monitoring units are going after this guys credibility, what may not be clear is that behind the scene, maybe the guy upset someone, filed a lawsuit against his company, or has something they want, or might even simply not be on the informant system themselves, and they are just using Jamie, and several others in this persons life to systemically remove them, from their outcomes.

The same group might also be in touch with Phylis, she is also an informant in the persons life, they now active her, or reactivate her.

Chief, or informant handler, or local monitoring unit

Now P this is what you are going to do, just tell the guy he looks a little spaced out, airy, maybe that her’s acting paranoid, or maybe you suspect he’s maybe using drugs, just document everything.

Phylis for her part is clear that she’s being asked to make the guy seem funny,  but she thinks it’s ok because this is what she’s being asked to do, maybe they just want the guy to seek some help.

Chief, informant handler, or local monitoring unit

Now Mira, I want you to do this, just do this, you got this neighbour here, everytime you see the guy outside, just report that he’s acting weird or strange, maybe you feel that your kids are at risk, everytime you see him, your’ going to say and document that he was acting weird, and maybe the guy needs to seek some help.

Mira: Has been an informant for year, is clear on what she is doing, but is only clear on her part, does what’s instructed, as she has a thousand times, because this is what they are required to do, and if it’s these individuals asking, who are affiliated with the police, or parole officer, or local monitoring units, she will do it.

Chief of police, local monitoring units, or handler, or even parole officer

Jeff you are just going to do this, your new best friend is dean, and you are just going to visit him, and when your their, just confirm that the guy was acting weird you know, looking off into space, maybe staring at you, you know, making you feel uncomfortable. Make sure it get’s reported back and documented.

Jeff is likely this sketchy low life that works for the police on a regular basis, in one capacity, and in one regards, he’s a local community rapist, child molester, and someone the police hold dear, cause he does the odd job for them, that can’t be on the records, or on the files. He’s fully willing to destroy this guy, infect his reputation, or even the person himself, whatever these people need to destroy this guy, cause that’s what he does, that’s what he’s
done a thousand times before, and will likely do a thousand times again.

Chief of police, handler, or local monitoring unit, or even parole officer

Staf: When you are in these situations with this guy, just tell him he’s acting weird, like maybe he’s got weird eye gestures or something, maybe he’s staring off into space, doing weird things with his hands, tell him you feel uncomfortable, and that maybe he needs to see someone.

Now there are probably dozens of other little players, employers, your public servants, who then get similar instructions, the guy has been acting out, acting weird, may be a threat to himself or others, medium risk, only to be seen in pairs.

That’s how they legitimize these files that go on for years, they are dirty, deceiving, Judas class, but then you already knew that, yourself. Between these deliberate individuals, these informants that are a part of the persons life, it’s the death of a thousand little deceptions.

These are some of the deceptions the dirty ones that go on, to keep a Targeted Individual in the incorrect situation, this is a conspiracy against their life, and it’s no longer suitable, across the globe, these situations are being played out on a daily basis, and they need to be addressed in the manner and the capacity to which they impact the society and the individual.

When a society, a community is littered with such situations, social interactions are infected, it tears at and destroys the very fiber, and fabric of the society, and this needs to be curtailed. For years it’s really come down to the Targeted Individual community to bring these situations, these conspiracies to light, it’s been years of research into these topics, but this is what I would like to see occur. I would like to see these conspiracies address and dealt with the way that suits, and makes sense. The informant system is doing nothing good, and needs to be changed and revamped. Part of these conspiracies, which we have at times called Gang Stalking, need to be addressed, and dealt with at the highest spiritual, and legal levels possible.

I would like to see changes to these structures, and to how these case files are documented. I want to ensure that those documenting, and bearing false reports are uniquely identified, even if it’s just anonymously. I would like to see changes to who can and can not be on the informant system. When you have lawyers, doctors, politicians, decision makers, who can be advised to side a certain way, pass this specific law, or make this specific decision because they are informants, or on the informant system, you have an undue influence, that is problematic, or even deadly for that society, and individual to whom or where it is aimed.

Indictment

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment

An indictment (/ɪnˈdaɪtmənt/ in-DYT-mənt), in the common law system, is a formal accusation that a person has committed a crime. In jurisdictions that maintain the concept of felonies, the most serious criminal offence is a felony; jurisdictions that lack the concept of felonies often use that of an indictable offence—an offence that requires an indictment.

Legal action might not be the incorrect thing in dealing with these situations, but is your lawyer free of subversion, are they free of the informant system, are the prosecutors? In the U.K. where Masons and their undue influence became such a problem, they literally had to pass laws, which might have required Mason affiliations to be revealed, as they might have, undue influence.

Should a similar law be passed when dealing with those on the influence, considering how intrenched this is in the background, throughout the society?

They night not want to reveal their identities, or affiliation, but maybe it’s time the laws protected those, that might be unduly affected, or destroyed, by the infection that is the informant system.

June 23, 2013 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Baiting, Citizen Informants, Conspiracy, Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Alternative Justice System

Alternative Justice System

More on the Threat Assessment Teams, and the Alternative Justice System. Ok so I have been looking into what’s happening, and I have been able to discover some interesting things, in addition to the Threat Assessment Teams,
that are there, within or just outside of that structure is another structure, an *Alternative Structure, but they may as well be the same.

The Threat Assessment Team have local people for each area who do the local monitoring, the monitoring teams. In my case the people are basically the lowest common denominators, they try to file false reports on a regular basis, and the structure they should use to evaluate the individuals in the situation, they manage to manipulate, or obstruct to the stage that they can keep the files or cases going for years at a time. The little they make for their efforts are often not worth it, thus why targets might get home break in’s and other items stolen, they are often not the most qualified, however they are the lowest common denominators and these are the individuals that they have in people’s lives and livelihoods.

Along with listing people as Mentally Ill, the Men in our communities and sometimes women as child molesters, Women as prostitutes, etc, they have also started to trend with falsely listing Targeted Individuals as HIV Positive when they are not. Trying to make people look like they are thieves (stolen credit cards) is another one that I have come across, it’s been fascinating research, on just how low these people are, and how truly scummy they are. Ralph, Lisa, this
goes out to you.

That’s the normal local monitoring units, which get assigned by the Threat Assessment Teams, in addition to this, the teams which are required to keep their distance, have instead been making contact with an underage minor child. The child is honestly able to receive instructions from the people in the situation, and follows the instructions, without knowing any better.

What’s been discovered recently is that one of the males in the situation of being on the local monitoring teams, is honestly also in the background, giving the underage minor child, and I do mean underage minor child explicit
instructions.

*(These people have one goal, one desire and it’s to get the children into the informant system as soon as possible, they honestly run interference in the lives of children, possibly even yours, that’s important to know, and understand.)

http://www.whale.to/b/stockton.html

I posting a link to this report, I can’t vouch for everything in the report, or even anything, but some aspects are correct, such as the majority of people being on the informant system, and who get’s let into specific countries.

The Alternative way the System works, which masks itself within or just outside of the Threat Assessment Team, but Mike who is more of a head hunter specifically hired by a company to insure the person stays in the incorrect situation, and that the incorrect situation keeps happening. The exact same structure is used, and it’s used on all the informants. I have been abel to access the hearing frequency that’s used for these people, and they get instructions when they are on the streets, the people are idiots mind you, but they do follow orders.

The video is the closest I could find, but it’s good enough. The loser in the situation here, works by telling them to bump into the Target, we just want to see the persons reaction, they are being evaluated, we just want to ensure they don’t react, meanwhile, you would have to be a complete idiot to go along with it, but on a given stroll, when you can hear this stuff, the people follow what they are being told, walk too close, just brush up, we just need to see a reaction.

What I have been able to discover is the guy behind this portion of it, is a head hunter hired by a previous company that I worked for, and has been hired to be in the situation, until I am removed from mine. The investigation is going really well, they are complete lowlifes. They are everything mentioned and more. Even without this specific scumbag, the local monitoring units, and their unit commanders are often the worst people at times, and they are people that have been on the informant system in most cases for years and years.

One of my neat discoveries is that they serious want to do something unsuitable to me, because I have specific items in my possession that they thought would belong to them someday. (They literally think that if I am not in the picture, they will be able to rob blind some items I possess. They are the lowness that me, and so many others did not need in our situation.) They make very little doing this, and so if they can steal, destroy our items, or just plot to steal them, they feel very good able themselves. I despise them with everything that I have, there is no other way to say it, when you truly
discover just how disgraceful, and low these creatures are that they put into people’s lives. (Again keep in mind that not every informant is low, and not everyone on the Threat Assessment Team is low, some are there to do a credible job, but the ones that get assigned all too often, are not the correct sort of people and they don’t do the correct things. I want to see the whole system get revamped if I could.)

Conspiracy is still the word, but if you understand how the system works a little bit, it all at times can seem perfectly normal to an outsider, who doesn’t take the time to look a little bit closer for the truth.

*(Alternative in the sense that the person has a specific alternative agenda, and uses methods within the structure.)

May 10, 2012 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Citizen Informants, Community harassment, Conspiracy | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hal Turner vs Julian Assange

Hal Turner vs Julian Assange

Now I am hearing a lot about Julian Wikileaks and that he could not be a disinfo site, cause now he is allegedly going to face charges, but it’s not necessarily true.

There was a shrill that worked for the government for years and who was on the payroll from the start, he was harassed a lot, and even went to jail, but he was a shrill the whole time.

See it’s nice to think that things should be painted in black and white, and that we would know the good guys from the bad guys but we often don’t. The thing to do is to start to look for identifiable patterns that help you to distinguish the one from the others.

Now I have no diffinative proof that Julian is a shrill, but I will say that he met a lot of the points patterns that point to that, even with the current arrest.

Now as many know in my research into Gang Stalking I have researched some of the extremist communities, and that is where I first heard about Hal Turner. Some for years had thought that he was a shrill, some even after the arrest, and his confession of being a government shrill still championed him.

During his time he did a lot of good, remember he was working for his assigned cause, but he was also helping set up people and give tips to the feds. So on the one hand he would hold rallies and vigils for people. Bring cases that would normally not get attention attention that they needed, for some he was seen as a leader, and a voice for his community. Other thought he was a loud mouth and a bit crazy.

What always amazes me about this type is their ability to raise funds, and have a wide array of sheeple singing their praises. There are other points that happen, but I am going to keep some of those to myself.

What is now known about Hal Turner is that he was a government informant and part of what he was hired to do was to spy on many of those in the community he claimed to represent. He seemed to be on the surface performing one function, but in the background he was performing a different function.

What people have to remember is this Hal Turner was a shrill, the handler and some in the FBI knew this, a lot of other people did not know this, and thinking that he was legitimate acted accordingly. What I believe I have discovered is that these people are often given an assignment. I don’t think that they even know who each other are, but they likely figure it out in time. Each does what they are assigned to do, be it post information, push a subject into the publics interest, etc. They go about their day to day lives, and most are none the wiser as they carry out a duel agenda.

http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/Records_show_feds_used_ultra-right_radio_host_for_years.html

For more than five years, Hal Turner of North Bergen lived a double life.

The public knew him as an ultra-right-wing radio talk show host and Internet blogger with an audience of neo-Nazis and white supremacists attracted to his scorched-earth racism and bare-knuckles bashing of public figures. But to the FBI, and its expanding domestic counter-terror intelligence operations in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, Turner was “Valhalla” — his code name as an informant who spied on his own controversial followers.

For the record Hal Turner is now sitting and rotting in jail, but for years he worked for them faithfully, pushing the edges of what he could get away with. He had watch dog organization on his tale, which may or may not have been a part of the subterfuge, and many people really disliked him for the views he sprouted, he also caused a great deal of controversy, got a lot of media play, and the whole time he was working for them. So it’s all very highly possible.

But the center of the court battle will likely be the story of Hal Turner and his FBI connections, which began in 2003 with the Newark-based Joint Terrorism Task Force, and continued on and off until this year.

Rumors of Turner’s FBI work surfaced two years ago after unknown Internet hackers electronically broke into his Web site and found e-mails between Turner and an FBI agent. Turner never acknowledged his FBI role until after his arrest in June — and then with a mix of anger and chagrin.

“Imagine my surprise,” he wrote in one of several letters from jail to The Record, “when agents from the very FBI that trained and paid me came to my house to arrest me.”

 

All across the internet these people have set up little Hal Turners, they are usually the one’s getting the attention, media play, and they are the ones the sheeple follow like the pied piper in many cases. Very rarely does anything get through that is really pure and clean. These fake messiahs are not all bad, they are the only way that some information seems to reach the public. I use some of their outlets when I can. I like to think some of them occasionally pull and tug at their leashes, but I think at heart most of them know who and what they serve, and thus a lot of the Internet is controlled, more than we know.

If Julian is not a shrill, then I wish him all the best, but based on a lot of things that I have seen, I am going to play it very cautious with this one and see what develops further.

December 8, 2010 Posted by | Above top secret, Awareness, CIA, Conspiracy, control, Controlled society | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Randy Quaid. Gang Stalking Target?

Randy Quaid is claiming to be a target of what he calls Hollywood Star Whackers.

He claims that other stars on on a similar type of hit list. Stars such as Britney Spears, Mel Gibson, and ofcourse Lindsay Lohan.

Randy Quaid claims that he has been followed around, and that he has been scammed out of money by lawyers and others. He claims not to be mentally ill, and that close friends such as Heath Ledgar, and David Carradine, were killed not by accident, but as part of a conspiracy.

The claims sound almost too outlandish to believe, but if you did a bit deeper into the story, a pattern starts to immerge.

I don’t know about Hollywood Star Whackers, but I do believe that Mr. Quaid is in fear for his life, and he could well be in some kind of danger. He says he has been harassed for at least the last 20 years. This is what I think is going on.

I think Randy and wife Evi at some point in their past likely landed on a list. Eg. Under occupational health and safety laws, you can be placed on a monitoring list via what’s called a Threat Assessment Team.

The team will contact those around you and explain why you have been flagged. Unfortunately this type of monitoring can also systemically destroy your life. This is the part that leaves many claiming conspiracy.

A lot of people are on these lists, some who should be there, many others who should not. I think what the Quaids should do is hire a lawyer, one who is familiar with privy laws, occupational health and safety laws, and mental health laws.

From what I have read the downward spiral really started after 26 of his co-workers complained of verbal and physical harassment. Claims such as this in today’s society get reported, and this can get you placed on one of these lists by the threat assessment teams, and it can also serve to blacklist your life. The other sad reality is that people on these lists die, because the monitoring often crosses the line to targeting, and a conspiracy of sorts.

I don’t know for sure if this is what’s going on with him and his wife, but I do have a strong suspicion that this is the case. The targets of what I just described, refer to this as Gang Stalking. You can read more about threat assessment teams and Gang Stalking at this link.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/threat-assessment-teams-gang-stalking/

Follow the information about the Quiads here.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1288343965/

To learn more about this phenomenon you can visit Amazon.com

Closing The Gap
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1453803319/

Bridging The Gap
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1441448845/

I know many do not yet take the concept of Gang Stalking seriously, many others live it every day and know all too well the conspiracy does exist. Being on these lists are leading to individuals being targeted systemically. In many cases the systemic targeting ends in death, suicide, institutionalization, jail, or social poverty.

This is the time that Targeted Individuals can now make a difference. November is Indigo Ribbon Month, it is the time to raise awareness of what is happening. http://www.IndigoRibbon.com

Only by sharing our stories one by one, till they can no longer be ignored can we get this exposed. When you can name it, then you can claim it. Gang Stalking sites have been working tirelessly to expose this conspiracy, with the help of those around us, this can be exposed, and the needless suffering of innocent Targets can hopefully stop, or be curtailed.

October 29, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Buring the candles at both ends

Buring the candles at both ends

After reading Mark’s post and finding that my situation was similar to his in ways that i did not like, I decided to make some drastic changes to some areas in my life that needed changing. I think those changes are going in the right direction, even though the short term outlook is not good, the long term outlook is fairly good.

I still have the same mentally underdeveloped informants in my realm. At least one in this batch, seems especially nasty, and I can’t help wishing him unwell, hey that’s just me. Interpret that however you like, you whiny crybaby.

Otherwise my focus is in several areas, trying to get everything done. Trying not to get sucked into the drama of others, and trying to find the best way to untangle.

From what I have read, the system in many countries is being used in horrible ways. Husbands who are sick of their wives are having them committed for no reason what so ever. Using the flimsiest of excuses. It’s incredible.

http://psychrights.org/index.htm

The state is listing people as a danger to themselves or others on the flimsiest excuses, and as I have mentioned dozens of times, there is a conspiracy that happens within all of this, of those around the target systemically trying to destroy the persons life. For me, it’s trying to divide and conquer, or keep me financially where I don’t need to be. Dependency on the system is not a good thing in any capacity.

Have not had a chance to check for an update on Mark, but when you are in a situation you can see things a lot more clearly than those outside of the situation. Many people talk conspiracy, but few can actually understand what it’s like or been like to have lived one.

Conspiracy is not just consisting of the state, it is consisting of friends, family, co-workers, and those around a target. The target’s life is not destroyed in a bubble, it is not as first thought, the targets life is destroyed by a system, a very willing, enabling system of conspirators. Can it change? Of course it can. I have no doubt about this, but people like this system, and that is why it has not changed.

Spiritually, I am ok, but missing my happy place in spirit a bit, but not sure why? Sometimes spiritual questions can only be answered in spirit.

Am I a part of the conspiracy club? No, the answer remains the same. People are deeply stupid. I despise this system, and all that was done to me. So for me, it means not joining forces with something that I think is inheritantly evil, no matter how many times I have pointed this out on the blog, people just still do not get it.

There are many types of people in this world. Those who are victimized and they go on to do whatever they can in their power to ensure it does not happen to anyone else again. Then there are those who are victimized and do everything in their power to ensure the others are victimized in the same way or worth. A type of sick pathology. You try to help them with the one hand, and they try to drag you down with the other.

I think a lot of people that have been targeted by this system are broken in just that way, and become exactly that. I think this system likes to try to acquire people that are not a part of it, and what they can not acquire they try to destroy.

I still get the odd informant trying to gain access to my life, and they always come of pretending to be something they are not. It’s funny that way. The complete lack of understanding of what a target goes through. They really just don’t get it. Most think that this system is something special. I think targets understand that this system is evil. I think the way this is used is evil.

So that’s my two cent’s for what it’s worth. Basically busy, alone in flesh, and spirit? Working towards doing what I can to get this out of my life, but to also try to make sure others are aware of what is happening with this system. Many do not yet understand what this system is, and or what it is capable of.

It means that you can not, absolutely can not trust those around you, a simple comment, question, innocent conversation, can and will be used against you. You must be wise as wolves, and innocent as doves.

(“Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves.) Matthew 10:16

Absolutely do not trust anyone. That sounds paranoid, but if you have lived through this system, then you understand it’s reach, it’s corruption, and it’s capacity to destroy. Pray consistently.

July 15, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Danger

Danger. Medium Risk. Only to be seen in pairs

State Conspiracy

New line out at zazzle. This line is dedicated to all the innocent men and women who have been targeted by the state. As you walk out in public go about your business there is a conspiracy against you.

Your friends, family, neighbors, coworkers, and even online counterparts that you try to associate with are likely getting a similar notice. Something to the effect that you are a danger, or a danger to others. You might have a risk level designation, and the additional benefit of a label that says, you are only to be seen in pairs. This goes out and it’s in part along with the gossip, lies, slander, and set up’s used to systemically destroy your lives.

It’s nice to see a line dedicated to the states destruction of innocent lives.  You can get caps, mugs, t-shirts, keychains, bags, bumper stickers, etc.

Enjoy the new line. If the state sees you as a danger, then you are likely doing something right, so say it loud, say it proud.

Link 1

Link 2

July 6, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Impasse. Open Secret

Impasse/Open Secret.

I have said this before, but I will say this again. What is happening is no longer a secret. This is now an open secret, everyone knows about it, but no one says anything about it.

So it’s not as if what is happening to targets is a secret. Even though the mainstream media has not exactly broken the story, the story is broken, it is out there. Now some even with all the evidence will continue to sing the same song, oh targets are crazy, but enough of you now know, are aware, and are part of the secret club, so that you can understand that a lot of what has been presented is truth.

So I am having a Gary Webb moment, perhaps bad example to use, but all I mean by this is, I have broken this story, it’s big, and I expect the media to come and take up the story. I expect people to be grateful for the truth, (I really don’t), but even if the mainstream would not cover this, I have spent the last four years online hearing about how the mainstream hides the truth, how we are being lied to, how there is a conspiracy, and that it seeks to harm us, well know what, I have just given you a conspiracy, told you the truth, and tried to help not just targets, but others.

Is the none mainstream rushing to share and publish the story, are they rushing to make sure the truth comes to light? No they are doing exactly what the mainstream does, or what they first did with the Mai Lia Massacre or what they totally did with the Gary Webb story. It’s all out there, people know, but no one in authority, no one responsible, and even most on the lower levels will do anything about it. This is why truth does not get revealed, this is why conspiracies exist. Often they are not dark little secrets that no one knows about, no in fact they are often open secrets that happen in pockets, with sometimes thousands, upon thousands being aware, but feeling bound to silence or secrecy.

Impasse. I think I have done most of what I set out to do, as far as discovering what was happen, getting the concept more normalized, but getting it fully exposed takes a village. I know the members of this village have first been silenced, unable to speak. I also know that many have given their loyalty and allegiance to this system, but if you don’t speak the truth, get this revealed then who will?

I don’t expect anyone to break the law exactly, but there are often cleaver ways of doing things if you wish to do them. I am ok with writing the articles, and doing the research that I can do, in fact if I could find a way, I would spend most of my time doing research, yes I am boring that way, but I find it fun.

Anyways so I am at an impasse, I have done what I was suppose to do for the most part. I even figured out a couple of other conspiracies along the way. Speaking of which, the civilian spy force are now clear on this right. You are what will be the heart and soul of the surveillance network that is formed? It’s happening slowly, and quietly, you are being bound in secrecy, so you can not speak of it, but this New World Order is being built on the backbone of this civilian force army. You in your communities, villages, and hamlets, you are who will be the handmaids of the New World Order, their eyes, their ears, their hands. A global, one world, surveillance, society. You will punish their enemies, you will systemically help to remove them, and you will believe that you are doing it for good, that it is something that must be done, should be done. The state wills it and it will be so. This is no different than in any other time period, and most will never see it for the evil that it is. This is the truth, wither you will believe it or not is another story, but there it is. Open Secret, and my impasse.

I remain prayerful. I think in times such as this, that is what you can do. Anyways I am not sad, or discouraged, I am just like, ok this is what it is. I realise that people have to wrap their minds around this. I have now had years, and most are just starting to wrap their minds around this, so I am going to leave you with this to mull over, send out good wishes, and come back to it and see what you say. In the meantime, if anyone out there in society has any good ideas, please feel free to leave a comment.

Thanks,

June 28, 2010 Posted by | activism, Conspiracy, control, Corruption, Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

How the system is working

This is a brief summary for targets still trying to grasp what might have happened and how their lives wound up in this place. Using some of these occupational health and safety/mental health laws, to the best of my knowledge workplaces, civil officials and others, can have a another official, deem a person as a danger to themselves or others. In more severe cases they might even go so far as to try to list you as gravely disabled, as they did with Britney Spears.

They can do this all behind your back. Health officials can declare you a danger to yourself, others, suffering from a mental illness, or even gravely disabled, based on the information provided to them by a third party. The third party does not even have to be the one initiating the complaint. However if you are fully functioning, they would have a hard time committing you, as we saw with the Lindsay Lohan case, who did not meet the criteria for a 5150 hold, but they apparently did suggest it. I think since she has obtained a lawyer, they have not been so bold to try this again.

Here is an example of such a senario. Eg. A employer wants to get rid of an employee who has been consistently complaining, they suggest they see a company paid psychiatrist.


http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

Under existing laws in some countries, states, etc. They can suggest but can not force a person to. What they can do however is add a lot of stuff to your file. They might even use evidence from the very individuals that you are making the complaint against, making it look as if you are the problem. This has been well documented by the mobbing community so I don’t think that I have to re-document this.

Once they bring your file often to one of their company paid psychiatrists, community health and safety review boards, university threat assessment teams, etc, they can then list you as a danger, or suffering from a mental illness. They can do that based on the criteria that says you are unable to function cause you are mentally impaired on how you are perceiving the things around you, or showing a degradation.

Once they list you as mentally ill, a danger to yourself or others, you are then placed on the lists. These lists act the same way the pedophile lists act. If you are walking through a community, the phone rings they get a call, dangerous, or mentally ill person in the area. Remember in many cases, you will not be aware of the drastic steps your employer, spouse, parent, civil authority, or others has taken. The only thing you will be aware of is the sudden harassment and community surveillance. As we have seen, when you try to complain about it and report it, they use this to say that you are suffering from a mental illness. The reality is the target is being systemically harassed and destroyed. This is being used as a means of retaliation by employers, civil workers in the community and others.

So those around you get contacted, told not to say anything, and ofcourse the useful idiots around you assume that it’s true, most act accordingly, which just makes your situation worst. You can then add in the fact that you might still be experiencing the original situation of harassment that you were in, when you made the complaint, this was the situation with the Damon Thompson case. Then any further attempts you make to get help or assistance for legitimate harasment that might still be happening, and which is likely to have escalated, is just viewed as further signs of your mental degredation.

In the Damon Thompson case, he did end up lashing out. This is then used to show that the diagnosis was correct, but the reality is much like workplace mobbing targets who lash out, there is more to the story. The reality is that listing an innocent person as mentally ill, is likely to be a catch 22, or self fulfilling prophecy. The listing ensures that the harassment gets multiplied, and thus often brings about more severe outcomes.

The listings of course cause the community to go into overdrive. Oh no a mentally ill person amongst us, we can’t have that, and they do perform the harassment behaviours that targets have listed. Remember they will use all the tactics that they would use against pedophiles against targets, and then some, but what has been documented is a deliberate campaign of harassment. Organized, orchestrated, including gaslighting, subtle harassment. They do it, cause they think that you are mentally ill, no one will believe you, and as targets have documented, the police don’t help, doctors, etc. They all use the listing to assume that you are mentally ill. Remember suggesting that there is a conspiracy against you, or that you are being tortured is a sign of mental illness, but the problem is that when someone goes behind your back, lists you as a danger to yourself, and others, or lists you as mentally ill, and tells everyone else but you, that is a conspiracy. Also when these citizen informants in the course of their monitoring use things like wicked lasers, or remote electronic monitoring devices to
surveil the target, and it harms the target, the target is fully correct in saying that they are being tortured. In both cases, this is what is happening with many targets, so under these circumstances the target is fully correct.

Again in most cases, you will likely have been wrongly assessed by some company shrill, salivating to do their masters bidding, or some equally panting community shrill. Maybe I am being harsh, and maybe some of these people really do make the only judgement that they can based on the lies that they are told. But when you are assessing someone based on one side of a story, that side being an employer, maybe family member with ulterior motives, civil employee, or other, there has to be more to go on before destroying someones life, but there is not.

Once you are listed and those around you are notified, most take advantage of the situation, any little conflict, they use it to paint you as a danger. Even where they is no conflict, we see stories getting made up, deliberate set up’s, eg. Mentally ill looking individuals being in the same location where the target is, so that your oh so kind community members can call it in. Now remember the average person is told there is a mentally ill person in the area, sometimes they are given a description, sometimes it just vague. So they will look around for anything that looks crazy and report it. Behind the scenes, there is a deliberate effort happening, to ensure that such people are in locations where the target is, so that the reports can keep coming, remember at this stage there is a bit of funding that goes into this, and the more mentally ill people the better. Also they don’t want it to come out that they are doing what they did in Russia, which is listing perfectly sane and healthy people as mentally ill, thus it’s in their best interests to use the useful idiots around you to carry out their bidding.

Again calling people useful idiots is harsh. They are often lied to. They see information and are given information that looks real, they are in many cases lied to and most people are simple, basic, they can not understand or conceive of the type of conspiracy being used against targets, or believe that the state would go through so much effort for one person. What people have to understand is that this is not so much effort for one person. This is a system. A system that is already in place with these types of resources, so that one person is like an ant colony dealing with an errant fly, that get’s into it’s path. The network is already in place, already set up in each community, all they have to do is point, click, tell the people whom to hate, and they do it. It’s no more expensive to get rid of one person than it is 20 if the network is already in place.

So you have the situation that most targets wake up to find themselves in. Being hunted, targeted, and having no idea why. You have those around the target that have been advised of their mental illness, danger to society, status, and the society goes on this. You have the target realising that their is a conspiracy, and the community thinking the person is having a breakdown and “doing everything to see that the target gets the help that they need.” A beautiful little symphony that usually results in the destruction of the target, by the malicious, or well meaning useful idiots around them.

The laws that are being used. Occupational Health and Safety, Workplace Violence Prevention, Mental health acts are where I am looking. This often starts in the community, work, school, etc, but once remotely evaluated, this goes into a couple of other areas. Mental health act laws, cause those in some cases are what are used, in other cases, it’s occupational health and safety laws, depends on the situation. The distribution of information, to the wide and varied world falls under the privacy laws, and what the rights of the individual are vs, the community at large. Eg. Though you might have the right to alert those around a target that they are in immediate contact with, do you really have the right to alert someone in bora, bora, whom they will never have any physical contact with, but are doing business with? No, but they are using this to systemically poison the lives of targets. Using it to harass them online, to disrupt business dealings and associations, to systemically blacklist and blackball innocent people.

Civil action. This is where we might be able to sue, under civil laws, if the information that has been supplied is false, information leading to you further being listed as mentally ill, dangerous. If targets can then access Freedom Of Information files, there are records kept of complaints, then they can try to use this to sue for any false or inaccurate information. If anyone has made a false statement or testimony deliberately, then this is the clause that would allow you to sue. This seems to work for America, Canada, and there is a U.K. clause. I think the U.K. clause works for most of Europe and Australia’s laws should be similar to laws governing the U.K.

So in getting proper assistance, you might want to ask for a lawyer that is skilled in privacy laws, labor laws, and mental health laws. Jane Clift was lucky, and targets have to be equally lucky to get the right assistance, or you will just be bounced around. Add to that that some lawyers are bound by the confidentiality of the program and might have a conflict of interest in discussing some of this information, and there you have it Bob’s your uncle, more or less a basic set up to this system. I am not a lawyer, but from what I have been able to gleam with my many hours of research, this should be a ruff idea of how this is working.

June 28, 2010 Posted by | activism, Controlled society, Corruption, crazy, Gang Stalking | , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Psychiatric Reprisal. Part 2 & 3

Named: People who become very angry, like Mr. T in the A Team, could have ‘intermittent explosive disorder’

Do you live surrounded by clutter – ancient copies of magazines, your children’s old toys, articles you’ve clipped out of newspapers over the years?

If you find it hard to throw out things of limited or no value, you could be suffering from hoarding disorder.

‘Hoarding’ is just one of the new mental conditions being added to the psychiatrists’ bible, or the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM), to give it its proper name.

Other new conditions identified as possibly needing professional help include binge eating – which is said to affect many people who are seriously obese – and ‘cognitive tempo disorder’, which seems very like laziness (symptoms include dreaminess and sluggishness).

There’s also ‘intermittent explosive disorder’, which involves occasionally becoming very angry suddenly.

Most bizarre of the proposed additions is one defined as ‘getting a thrill at being outraged by pornography’.

3

It seems that those in the western world who do not fall in line and follow the norms that the society prescribes as normal, could soon be in for an experience similar to that of the former Soviet Union.

Childhood temper tantrums, teenage irritability and binge eating may soon rate as psychiatric disorders in the US, according to proposed changes to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the bible of the psychiatric profession.

4

Things like childhood temper tantrums, teenage angst, and binge eating, might in today’s society be unpopular, but are they worthy of being classified as signs of mental illness and possibly being drugged away?

Proposed changes to the U.S. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) could include reclassifying childhood temper tantrums, teenage angst, and binge eating as psychiatric disorders. If accepted, the proposals could equal billions of dollars in new revenue for pharmaceutical companies.

5

Is being antisocial really a sign of mental illness? Are these laws just designed to target those who do not fit into a future state agenda?

The new edition may include “disorders” like “oppositional defiant disorder”, which includes people who have a pattern of “negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures.” Some of the “symptoms” of this disorder including losing one’s temper, annoying people and being “touchy”.

Other “disorders” being considered include personality flaws like antisocial behavior, arrogance, cynicism or narcissism. There are even categories for people who binge eat and children who have temper tantrums.

Children are already over-diagnosed for allegedly being bipolar or having attention-deficit disorder (ADD), which results in their being prescribed dangerous antipsychotic drugs. To categorize even more childhood behaviors as psychiatric disorders will only further increase the number of children who will be needlessly prescribed antipsychotic drugs.

6

Is western society slowly implementing many of the same criteria that allowed Soviet psychiatrists to label many healthy individuals as mentally ill, just by following a criteria and trying to lump everyone into those criteria, and weeding out the ones who do not fit?

The APA panel is also suggesting adding a new condition category to DSM called “risk syndromes”. People who are suspected to potentially be at risk for developing a mental disorder but do not yet have one would be deemed as having “psychosis risk syndrome”. This category would include teenagers who exhibit “excessive suspicion, delusions and disorganized speech or behavior,” for example.

The APA made it clear that its goal with the revisions is to diagnose people as early as possible with mental disorders, even before they actually have them, in order to get them on treatment.

6

If these risk syndromes are added to the new update, then you could be dealt with not for having a mental disorder, but just for having a factor that puts you at risk of having a mental disorder. You could be in treatment for just being suspected of potentially being at risk for developing a mental disorder.

“It not only determines how mental disorders are diagnosed, it can impact how people see themselves and how we see each other,” Alan Schatzberg, president of the American Psychiatric Association, which publishes the guide, told reporters. “It influences how research is conducted as well as what is researched. It affects legal matters, industry and government programmes.”

4

Might such factors already be affecting how we interact with each other? How we view each other? Are these criteria or similar being used to falsely diagnose individuals in western society as having a mental illness when they do not?

Cases

In the article giving workers the treatment, Peter Downs cites several cases of workers who complained and then were asked to see a psychiatrist. This is happening at thousands upon thousands of workplaces in many democratic societies. A condition of continued employment might even be based on such a forced encounter.

The first case sited in the article is that of Norm Crosty

On October 5, 1998, Norm Crosty sent a letter to the labor relationsdepartment at his plant. Crosty, for thirteen years an electrician at Ford Motor Company’s Wixom, Michigan, assembly plant, complained that he could not do his job because so many of his bosses were taking the necessary equipment out of the plant to work on their homes or personal businesses.

The next day, the plant director of human resources invoked a Ford program for combating workplace violence to bar Crosty from the factory and ordered him to see a company-paid psychiatrist or lose his job.

7

In this case for making what was a very legitimate claim, the worker was not only barred from his place of employment, but was ordered to see a psychiatrist. The ford program for combating workplace violence, most likely falls under the occupational health and safety laws that have been used to target others.

A little more than fourteen months later, and 725 miles away, officials at Emory University cited a similar concern about violence to justify using armed guards to escort Dr. James Murtagh off university property when Dr. R. Wayne Alexander, chairman of the department of medicine at Emory, ordered him to see a company-selected psychiatrist or lose his job. Six weeks earlier, Murtagh, a professor of pulmonology at Emory, had filed a false claims suit against the university, alleging that it had misspent millions of dollars in federal grant money.

7

It seems that members of society who complain, blow the whistle, or assert their rights at work, are being targeted under these health and safety provisions. The laws were originally put in place to protect the rights of workers who have the right to a safe work environment, but it seems that they are increasingly used to silence those who continue to complain, blow the whistle, or file complaints. Many targets of workplace mobbing, who complain about it, or get angry about it, seem to be having warning markers or notifications placed on their files often without their knowledge or awareness.

Across the United States, companies have seized upon concerns about workplace violence to quash dissent. Hundreds of large corporations have hired psychiatrists and psychologists as consultants to advise them on how to weed out “threatening” employees. They say they are only responding to a 1970 directive from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration that they maintain a “safe and secure work environment.” But by drawing the definition of “threatening” as broadly as possible, they are giving themselves a new club to bang over the heads of workers.

Maria Buffa, a former salaried employee in the personnel department at Ford World Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, said she, too, was sent to a psychiatrist after she filed a sexual harassment complaint in February 1999 against a woman co-worker. “You think, maybe I am the problem, else why would they be sending me to a psychiatrist,”

7

This pattern of the state using psychiatrists to follow a set of diagnostic markers to access workers remotely, often without interviewing the workers is very similar to the pattern that was happening in the former Soviet Union, which allowed many innocent individuals to be falsely misdiagnosed.

As you might expect, the Postal Service, given its reputation for workplace violence, has bought into the psychiatric testing. Last September, Postal Service executives proposed to give line supervisors the right to order emergency psychiatric exams for employees who are argumentative. Unionists say this will jeopardize their ability to represent their members. ”

Albanese admits there are some people who clearly need help, but he says the Postal Service has so broadened its definition of events that can trigger a mandatory exam that “it is very easy to tie someone up in that psychiatric situation.” According to the APWU, “The following is a list of factors that a supervisor can consider when deciding whether or not to send an employee for a fitness-for-duty exam: significant increases in unscheduled absences, increased bathroom use, changes in behavior or work performance after lavatory or lunch breaks, deterioration in personal hygiene and/or cleanliness of the work location, inattention to work duties and progressive deterioration in concentration and memory, [and] threatening behavior. Supervisors can also impose emergency fitness-for-duty exams if an employee becomes argumentative, or shows an unusual interest in news stories or literature dealing with violence.”

7

These could be people who also just do not enjoy their jobs very much. Unscheduled absences, increased bathroom use, changes in behavior or workplace performance. How many workplaces implement unpopular changes which drive some workers away from their normal job functions, or make the regular job functions so unbearable that they just do not wish to be in the environment? Lot’s of companies do, thus many individuals at one point in their lives or another might fall into this criteria.

The web site for Michael H. Corcoran, Ph.D. & Associates, Inc., for example, asks: “Will the expert you consult be willing to render an opinion of dangerousness and be willing to put it in writing?” and “Will the expert be willing to do this without interviewing the subject personally?”

Some psychiatrists in the field doubt that any reliable judgment can be made without interviewing the subject.

7

Yet it seems that in the case of many individuals that is exactly what is happening. People are being assessed remotely, and yes some psychiatrists are diagnosing patients as mentally ill, schizophrenic, etc. They are then having warning markers placed on their files, placing them on notification lists, they are then subsequently followed around and harassed by the community at large. A practice that the Targeted Individual community has come to call and classify as Gang Stalking.

Speaking for himself, he says it is possible to tell if a worker is likely to become violent on the job, but not with 100 percent accuracy. But, he insists, “it will require more than just one session with the worker, and it will also require information from other sources close to the patient, including relatives, acquaintances in the neighborhood, work, etc.” If a psychiatrist is evaluating someone who is already on the job, he says, “one measure to prevent mistakes is to require a second opinion. That would give the individual the option to appeal and have his or her own evaluator.”

Unionists are skeptical of the objectivity of the psychiatrists the companies use. “We call them prostitutes, because they will write whatever the Postal Service wants them to,” says Shirley McLennan, vice president of APWU Local 4 in Louisville, Kentucky, of the doctors who do fitness-for-duty exams.

7

What if the information is coming from hostile other sources, such as jealous neighbours, or even distant neighbours, hostile co-workers, and family who immediately assume that their relatives are mentally ill, just based on the criteria of being interviewed about wither their relative could be mentally ill?

Donald Soeken, a former U.S. Public Health Service psychiatric social worker who used to be in charge of giving fitness-for-duty exams, says the psychiatric exams almost always are shams. “The doctor will go into all the areas that could discredit a person,” Soeken says. “He’ll ask early life questions, late life questions, sexual questions, whatever he wants to ask, and then write it up and give it to the boss or law firm. Any doctor worth his salt will find something wrong, or even make up something, and if you don’t answer one of his questions, then you are uncooperative and you can be fired for that, too. What they are trying to do is put a person out on a psychiatric disability. If they succeed, you would never work again in your lifetime.”

Soeken is sometimes called the father of the fight against abusive fitness-for-duty exams. While doing such exams for federal employees at the Public Health Service’s outpatient clinic in Washington, D.C., in 1978, he discovered that many of the people sent to him were either whistleblowers or people who had a personality clash with the boss. The employer making the referrals expected him to give them the ammunition to get rid of employees for mental health reasons.

7

Though not the exact same as being sent off to a Soviet Union state mental health facility, this practice could render a worker unable to work again. It could render a worker unfit to stay gainfully employed because they choose to blow the whistle, or had a disagreement with the boss. This practice in American society has been in place since at least the 1970, and similar practices are in other democratic countries.

After leaving the Public Health Service in 1994, Soeken established Integrity International to assist whistleblowers in the private sector. Since then, he has testified as an expert witness in seventy psychiatric reprisal lawsuits. Soeken warns anyone who will listen not to trust the company psychiatrist.

“If you assume the doctor is concerned about your health and well-being, you’ve made a deadly assumption,” he says. “They are looking for any phrase or evidence they can use against you to stereotype you as schizophrenic, paranoid, or delusional.”

7

This is why individuals who have never seen a mental health professional can be classified as delusional, schizophrenic, paranoid, etc, without ever having had a mental health exam. This can be done remotely. Remember this is not happening in the former Soviet Union, this is not happening in China, this is happening in democratic countries. America, Canada, The U.K., and many other democratic countries. Along with many none democratic countries.

Tom Devine, legal director for the Government Accountability Project. Often, another goal is to smear and discredit the employee. That, he said, is why psychiatric harassment “is unsurpassed in its ugliness.”

In Crosty’s case, a notice on the company bulletin board announced he had been expelled from the plant for psychiatric reasons. “It was very demeaning,” says Crosty. With the help of an attorney, and after he was cleared by four different psychiatrists, he got his job back, but “I was totally discredited as some kind of kook and wacko,” he says.

In Murtagh’s case, administrators at Emory “spread a rumor that he could be armed and dangerous, and a terrorist threat,” says Devine, whose organization has taken up Murtagh’s defense.

7

These practicies are being used across democratic workplaces, educational facilities, and other areas of society. These practices are being used on unsuspecting members of society. It’s being used to discriminate, silence, and destroy the lives on many innocent individuals. In addition to fit for duty exams, warning markers are being placed on files, citizens are being declared as having mental illnesses, in many cases without having ever been assessed by a health professional, and even if they are assessed, there is no guarantee of a fair assessment, in some cases these health professionals are going on rumours and hearsay of the administration that wants to have the worker removed from their job.

Based on this criteria it’s easy for the system to not only be abused by Employers, but also by employees who wish to get away with harassing fellow coworkers. Eg. If an employee complains too much, files a complaint, they can be placed on a notification system. If other employees go to Human Resources with complaints about an employee, reports are gathered together. The information is forwarded from Human Resources, and then to the Occupational Health and Safety team members who can be made up of a number of internal employees, plus a number of outside employers. Some workplaces and universities even have a special threat assessment team to determine if a worker could become a danger to themselves or others.

Employees and Educational facilities can recommend that a worker seek psychiatric assistance, or even use the Employee Assistance Program if one is in place, but in many cases they can not force an employee to undergo an assessment, what they can do instead is they can add a warning marker to an employees file. Using the occupational health and safety, workplace violence prevention laws, they can add a warning marker without the individuals knowledge. Once a warning marker is added, which could say a variety of things, including that the subject has displayed violent behaviours, might be suffering from mental health issues, etc. A notification is sent out to everyone in the targets environment, under the guise of protecting the community.

What community notifications really do is poison the targets environment, and often not only socially annexing the target, but opening the target to unspeakable harassment by the community at large. These notifications are in many cases treated the same way notifications about violent offenders and other predators are treated, it puts the community into a frenzy, and the target is treated as a pariah in many cases.

Once the community receive the notification, they often start to monitor and follow the target around. Many will even gaslight the target and other subtle, and not so subtle forms of harassment in an attempt to remove the target from the environment. Thus Gang Stalking is also referred to as community mobbing, taken to the extreme. This practice not only disrupts the life of the target, it’s fully capable of destroying the targets life. Because the notifications are systemic, they follow the target everywhere they go, every new job that they apply for, every new association that the target tries to form is poisoned by these notifications.

In the case of Damon Thompson he reports having made many complaints of harassment by both student and staff alike. Though he did not receive any help, student affairs reports that he was known to them. In cases similar to his, what has been known to happen to others is that the continued complaints about staff and students is not used as a learning opportunity to address mobbing on campus, or in the workplace, but is used to classify the person complaining and seeking help as mentally unwell. In similar cases, targets have had files opened, and been placed on notifications, which then increases the level of harassment the target experiences. Then due to the notification, further complaints by the target are treated as a sign of mental illness, rather than a cry for help, as they are further targeted in their environment.

Damon Thompson became violent and attacked a fellow student. He was arrested, and will likely go to jail. The fellow student he attacked a Katherine Rosen who did recover, but reports from an overseas paper report that he had made several complaints against her in the past. When the U.S. media reported the same story, they reported it as an unprovoked attack, and said that the student had just snapped for no apparent reason.

sources close to him and his family indicated that prior to this incident he had made countless complaints against classmates and this specific lab partner but with no results. Contrary to US media reports, Thompson did know Rosen who was his lab partner and who has been very offensive to him on previous occasions and even the day in question. Now UCLA in an attempt to shift blame away from itself has sought to discredit the mental stability of Thompson by using his many complaints by e-mail as an indication of instability.

But according to KTLA news, a professor who taught Thompson said he told a university administrator he was worried about the student’s mental health 10 months ago. UCLA history professor Stephen Frank, who taught him Western civilization late last year admits that Thompson sent him several emails complaining that classmates sitting around him had been disruptive and made offensive comments to him while he was taking a written exam and even accused the Professor of taunting him.

8

What many individuals are unaware of is that the very act of seeking out aid and assistance for workplace mobbing, or harassment, can be used against the person complaining to make it seem as if they are mentally unstable.

One e-mail stated “I believe I heard you, Professor Frank, say that I was ‘troubled’ and ‘crazy’ among other things,” Thompson wrote. “My outrage at this situation coupled with the pressure of the very weighted examination dulled my concentration and detracted from my performance.”

Frank said he was present during the entire exam, that Thompson sat in the front row and that he saw nothing to support the student’s complaints. Frank said he was told that other professors had reported similar exchanges with Thompson, who complained he was taunted by other students — in class, the dorms, dining areas and the library. A university official told Frank that he could only suggest that Thompson seek treatment, but they couldn’t require him to seek psychological help. “My concern was in the context of other violent incidents on campuses around the country,” Frank said.

Sources close to his family explain that Thompson frequently spoke with his mother and complained about the many things student had done to him and the names he was called even by the female students. However, they explain that the problem had to be extreme for Thompson to have reacted so violently

8

It seems that in some democratic countries similar psychiatric reprisal practices have been in place for the last 40 years or more. While many were pointing the finger at countries such as the former Soviet Union and China, many democratic countries were subtle implementing policies, practices, and procedures that were almost as harsh as those practices in none democratic countries. It seems for the last few decades the occupational health and safety laws have been used in a way similar to how the laws were used in the former Soviet Union. As early the 70’s there were reports of these laws being used to target whistleblowers and those who did not get along with their boss.

For change to happen and the abuses within the system to stop, the media, must be willing to report the abuses, like they were when these abuses happened in other countries. Society must wake up to the reality that we are using occupational health and safety laws, not always to protect society, but to target dissenting voices in many cases. To target those who are different, those who stand out, those who are still willing to complain, or fight for what they believe in.

With the future changes to the DSM rules and regulations, democratic countries could well wittingly or unwittingly be exactly where the former Soviet Union was just a few short years ago. Targeting perfectly sane, perfectly healthy productive members of society and declaring them as mentally ill to fit an a state and corporate agendas. A society where everyone is the same is not a creative, productive, or forward momentum society and eventually such societies do not remain productive for very long. The people just loose the will, when everyone is the same. When everyone is forced to think the same, act the same, and individuality, eccentricities, or differences are legislated, medicated, or socialized away.

1. http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=d242g51470r84388&size=largest

2. http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/30/1/131.pdf

3. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1251309/Psychiatrists-want-angry-mental-illness-How-utterly-mad.html#ixzz0p5GCoaKQ

4. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/10/diagnostic-statistical-manual-proposals
5. http://www.naturalnews.com/028762_children_disorders.html

6. http://www.naturalnews.com/028803_psychiatry_disease.html

7. http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

8. http://www.guardian.bz/component/content/article/53-headlines/842-belizean-stude%20nt-at-ucla-facing-attempted-murder-charges

June 26, 2010 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Blacklisted, community mobbing, Conspiracy | , , , , | 5 Comments