Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

No child under the age.

Ben’s Law

It’s a requirement and request that those in agencies, and on the informant system  stay away from children under the age. Primarily under the age of 14. No undue influence, contact, or remote manipulations are eligible. They are no longer eligible. Also those on the informant system can not, and should not be in touch with a child, under the age of 14.

It’s mandate also states and requires that they have limited interaction with children under the age of 18, there are already child protection, and child endangerment laws in place, specific situations, things that can be done, and not done with a child under the age of 18, irregardless of if they are on the informant system, or not. Those laws now have to start kicking in, and being in place.

I am personally tired of the stupidity, the undue influence with these children, if they are under 14, there should be not eligible to have contact with the informant force, so please, eneligible this mandate to go through. I hope the agencies will review their policies very carefully, in regards to underage children, and I hope they will review this situation very carefully.

July 24, 2013 Posted by | activism, Children, CIA, Citizen Informants, Informants | , , , | Leave a comment

Underage Informants

Underage Informants
An issue of Child Abuse

This might be a sensitive topic, but it needed to be addressed, the article yesterday spoke in part about a 15 year old, that was on the informant system, someone the police used, that assisted with 30 arrests, and for his efforts he was deported, and removed from the country.

Underage informants, they do exist, let’s face it. Police are not suppose to use children under a specific age, but they do. There need to be rules and regulations for the age that you can officially, unofficially have an underage minor child on the informant system,

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/09/03/120903fa_fact_stillman?currentPage=2

Every day, offenders are sent out to perform high-risk police operations with few legal protections. Some are juveniles, occasionally as young as fourteen or fifteen. Some operate through the haze of addiction; others, like Hoffman, are enrolled in state-mandated treatment programs that prohibit their association with illegal drugs of any kind. Many have been given false assurances by the police, used without regard for their safety, and treated as disposable pawns of the criminal-justice system.

East Germany used underage children as informants, a suitable part of the informant force was underage, the America’s, also use underage informants, as do other countries, but what age is too little?

Let’s face it some parents are so inured in the informant system, that they would place their children on the informant system from the time they were born if they could. Some probably have thinking that  they would likely end up being informants. The funny thing about the informant system, is most people think urban, communities correct? That’s likely where a lot of this first hits, but recall the informant system has been in place since ancient times. Judas being one of the most famous informants, in human history.

http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/SnitchSystemBooklet.pdf

The English informant system is well documented, and thus the colonies, would have had exposure to the informant system, and those in contact with them, thus a global informant system.

The use of truly underage children, is what I wish to discuss, the official version is what 14, or 15, but there are younger, as mentioned, I am now clear, that some will attempt to enlist their children onto the informant system from the time they are born, if you are a little child who’s parent or parents are informants, and that is their culture, they may well try to broker a deal off or on the records with their handlers. You would imagine that such would only occur in impoverished urban areas, but again, you might be surprised. Some try to add children to the informant system, some to government agencies. It’s pretty scary, and specific.

My recommendation in advance, future forward, is that no child under the age of 14 be eligible for the informant system. Are they committing crimes, then the juvenile system, without the informant system, but it must be managed a specific way. Police on the beat in these area, see the next generation of informants, when they see these children at times, or the quota that has to be meet, in regards to getting informants into the mix. One officer, let’s call her Redman, sees an ethnic minority, and she wonders why is this person not on the informant system. She has a clear mental mandate, in her world, if the person is a minority, in her city, the person must be on the informant system at some point, if they are not, she has ways of arranging attempting to arrange it. 🙂 The officers, they are hard at work are they not?

I can’t change the past, or rather will not attempt to, but from the time the recommendation was spiritually, and on the planet made, I don’t want to see ones under 14 on the informant system, so that the next generation can have a chance to survive. I would also like to see guidelines for the others already on the system, that are already informants, and that will not be broken out of the habit. Once they become informants, and internalize it, or learn the habits, once they are broken into that type of mentality, they will not likely break out, and that generation is likely a little bit lost in that capacity, but there is still hope.

The Abuse

When people are clear that your kids are informants, and they are on the informant system, people act towards them a specific way in some cases. Eg. As mentioned the informants themselves are often open to abuse, and threats from their handlers, minders, parole officers, Chief of police, etc. So let’s say someones kid is an informant, the individuals in the situation, might no longer see a child, they might see a threat, someone who could easily set them up, someone subject to the same threats, and abuses, and someone subject to the same death sentences, rapes, murders, abuses.

Let’s say that’s someone 4 year old, 5 year old, 7 year old, this exposes the child to situations of an adult nature they might not previously have been exposed to, such as sexual abuses, that are prevalent in the informant system, beatings if they fail, or set someone up, abuses that the adult informants are subject to, becomes a part of their worlds, and existences, it is most unsuitable, and unfair.

Also as documented before, they use a specific frequency. That is the truth. Humans have specific hearing frequencies, when they are placed on the informant system, they are spoken to at times via these hearing frequencies. The informant can hear, the general public can not, it’s a most fascinating review. What I am now clear on is they talk to children, children, at 5 and younger on these frequencies, instructing them, giving details of what to say and do, this should be illegal and banned, this is a form of child abuse in the highest degree, and should not be eligible, to be in the correct situation, doing the correct thing, this should no longer be eligible, or allowed, in human history.

Variations

There are some, as young as 11 or even younger, who have an informant system mentality, they love the thought of setting individuals up, destroying their lives, and if evaluated, they would should as closer to an adult mentality, even though of an underage, these are variations that must be examined. They are under age, still needing protection, but the society also has to be protected, should they be eligible to be on the informant system early?

Individuals that are 17, on the cusp of adulthood, but truly have a childlike mentality, and are not well suited for the informant system, should they be eligible, or required to join, since they truly do not have a proper comprehension of what is ongoing?

These are the variations, that I would like to see reviewed, within the confines of the laws, and maybe outside. I do however wish to see all ineligible contact with minors discontinuing. There is so much abuse that occurs, emotional, sexual, psychological, social, and so forth.

Contact

Because these individuals can place children into the informant system, early and often do, these kids are getting instructions, being exposed to a dirty culture that is not theirs, in some cases, and learning, learning, to be a detriment to the society. They are learning nothing suitable in some cases, but they are well versed on betrayal, setting people up, spying on them, and informing, telling lies, betraying people, and setting up the next one, till they are zombified also. They in some cases, will not see it as anything, because it is what they have been taught.

If I did this the official way, and this is what I would like, and want to see, I would like to see, social/psychological evaluations for some of these future informants, but that would ruin the whole sceem of things would it not? However as much as the informant system was to be a private system, with oh you never know who is on the system, I am now clear they are using children, and the same way these names in the papers are killed, what of these children, that you are using in these situations?

I am tired, because this has been a real review, the little I do understand from doing the research is the cusp of what is to be understood, but from the outside, it is wise and well to only understand, and comprehend only so much, cause only someone on the outside, can change things, or rather attempt to make the recommendations and change things.

http://tdn.com/news/safe-to-snitch-jeremy-mclean-s-family-says-task-force/article_54fa1cb9-1ef4-5f04-9ff7-5fe78335b563.html

Mitch McLean said the drug enforcement agent told him his son would be safe. The officer, who was Jeremy McLean’s “handler” with the Cowlitz-Wahkiakum Narcotics Task Force, said he would look out for Jeremy and that the people Jeremy would be ratting out “were not dangerous anyway,” Mitch McLean said.

A case that has dragged on for years in the courts involved LeBron Gaither, a sixteen-year-old student at a public high school in Lebanon, Kentucky. One afternoon, Gaither, who, according to his family, was generally mild-mannered, had an outburst in which he punched the school’s assistant principal in the jaw. He was taken into custody for juvenile assault. An officer from the Kentucky State Police came to see him, and told him that he could face a prison term or he could agree to become a local drug informant.

All I can do is recommend. I believe very strongly that children, under the age of 14 should not be used. If there is any obstacle to this, they should be socially, and psychologically evaluated, no ambition, truly wishes to be a part of this, is of a clear understanding, and comprehension, that see what is suitable. Beyond that, I really do not want children that are those ages and younger, on the informant system, but I also do not believe that a 17 year old who is of a childlike mentality should be on the informant system, and would evaluate them, to see if there is something else or some other option for them.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/09/03/120903fa_fact_stillman?currentPage=2

I heard some version of Taylor’s statement dozens of times in the course of more than seventy interviews with people whose lives have been shaped by America’s growing reliance on young drug informants—narcotics officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and the friends and families of murdered C.I.s, as well as some former informants.

These stories are heart breaking and tragic are they not, but recall most of the individuals in these stories were over 14, and imagine if the police continue to rely upon, and to use, underage minor children, what will become of the society, or societies, and the future, as future generations, learn to be betrayers, who lie, cheat, set up those around them, and are vulnerable to all sorts of abuse, and intrigues, will they not perhaps, deliver a destiny to future generations, unless something is done to curtail this situation, these situations now.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/curbing-the-informants/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2013/07/07/revamping-the-informants/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/the-informant-system-2/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2013/06/23/the-amnesty/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2013/06/23/conspiracy-indictment/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2013/06/21/throwdown-2/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/world-ruler-101-2/

July 11, 2013 Posted by | activism, Awareness | , , | 2 Comments

Curbing The Informants

Curbing The Informants

This should er a pretty easy task correct? Not, because again, they have these handlers, and the truth is, you can take a pretty average person, who wasn’t that great to begin with, and place them on the informant system, and watch them become one of the worst persons, ever seen. Biggest Betrayer, check, Full of lies, check, Deceitful, Check. All the old stereotypes come to life when the informants, and the informant system is involved.

So how do you revamp it? Seriously how do you from the outside revamp it? Well you can put measures in place, it’s illegal for you to deliberately argue, or cause a injurious argument with this individual, because you have been advised or instructed to do so.

Ensuring that the informants have a clear list of guidelines, about what is appropriate, and what is not appropriate, is nice to say, but it’s not realistic. If it was realistic, then the Rachel Hoffman situation would not have happened, there would have been a clear list of guidelines, a young lady in this situation, can not be used for this type of situation and so forth, can not even be asked to be used for such a situation, or Bianca Hervey could not have been turned into a drug informant, for unpaid parking tickets, recall, the young lady, had no drug use, or drug history, but that’s what they attempted, in the small sleepy town of Attica.

http://www.snitching.org/2009/11/recruiting_new_informants.html

Clear set of guidelines do very little good, when the police officer walks up to the informant and tells them, or rather forces them, down on their blanking knees, to perform the blanking task, or be another, blanking statistic. They can potentially go through some scary stuff, but then some of them are just ass*oles, period. This is the side you don’t see, and it’s a waste of space and time and energy to pretend anything else. Once they are on this system, many of them are viewed as chattel, slaves, informants, they are not viewed as human the exact same way, and they use them as inhuman. So I can give informant A, a lovely set of guidelines, don’t deliberately provoke this person, it’s outside of the guidelines of what you are required to do, but the reality is when that handler, parole officer, Chief of Police, Police officer, what have you, whomever they have to respond to tells them what to do, they are nothing more to them in many cases, liken unto the bitches on the block, who do what they are told.

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2012-03-15/news/save-bosco-enriquez/

Though he had cooperated with Miami police to bust as many as 30 gang members — including leaders of the infamous International Posse — authorities allowed him to be beaten, raped, and exiled to the country of his birth with barely a mention of his service.

And even when they do what they are told, they will still lead them to their deaths, or detriment correct? Yes this young man did not survive either, he assisted with 30 busts, and his reward, deportation, and determent. Awesome, because that’s, all they are ever doing. Age 15, what a career, but let’s be honest, if he is there illegally, maybe, it’s not even a matter of choice.

If they don’t do what they are told, they can set them up, do a whole world of shi*, unto them, and most times it never get’s back to the handlers, cops, what have you, it’s just that type of situation. Everyone recall the Kathleen Johnson case?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Johnston_shooting

One of the officers planted marijuana in Johnston’s house after the shooting.[7][8] Later investigations found that the paperwork stating that drugs were present at Johnston’s house, which had been the basis for the raid, had been falsified.[3] The officers later admitted to having lied when they submitted cocaine as evidence claiming that they had bought it at Johnston’s house.[7] Three officers were tried for manslaughter and other charges surrounding falsification and were sentenced to ten, six, and five years.[3]

Atlanta narcotics officers alleged their informant bought drugs inside Johnston’s home earlier in the day from a man named “Sam”, and that the home had video surveillance equipment justifying the no knock warrant. In an interview with Atlanta television station WAGA a few days after Johnston’s shooting, the informant denied having gone to her house and said that after the shooting, police pressured him to lie and say that he had.

I think the informant in that case, ended up going into witness protection or something, but it’s the fact that he was asked, or felt forced to bear witness and say he had regularly purchased drugs, at this innocent woman’s home. It was brave of him, because it took a lot of guts, most times, the situation would literally, be the informant is asked, told, advised to do this, perform option, a) or b) and they do so, without question, because of the type of situation it is.

http://www.snitching.org/2012/03/the_way_its_supposed_to_work_o.html

When curbing the informants, this will not be done, unless the handlers, parole officers, officers, chiefs, and those they are in contact with that ask favors, are eligible to be in the correct situation, doing the correct thing, meaning, till it get’s back to them, the front line informants will still be doing the same thing, and I mean this, they don’t care if it’s a president, Queen, King, Prince, Princess, Top Lawyer, Politician, Decision Maker, Civil Worker, these types are getting into trouble, getting onto the informant system, then, when the handlers come begging, and calling, they are required to do what needs to be done, unless they have risen high enough up the hierarchy of needs, and wants.

It’s a dog eat dog world, and it does not get better, until you recognize the hard cold facts, once you do that, then you can have a realistic expectation, of the reforms that need to be done, but beyond that, let’s not play games, you can reform the laws as much as you like, give a set of guidelines, which is still a good idea, but the laws are pointless, without reinforcement, and the only way to reinforce, is to be clear on what they are up against.

Also for the Village idiot informants out there, you know, who you are. Are you being asked to destroy a relative, person at work, make their lives a living hell, enable them to act out, so they can be labelled mentally ill. (Targeted Individuals), well guess, what, when you are destroying us, sometimes they are destroying you, in the background, yess. Because sometimes you are having files opened on you, showing you are these disruptive types, who pull this shi* disturbing behaviors, are people who are argumentative, and have these types of disruptive situations, with the individuals in their lives. Yes you are also getting your own little threat assessment team files. The knife cuts both ways. Interesting hmmm.

What I really recommend is the conspiracies be documented. Person X is taking his directions from this person, great, then person, A-P are also likely getting instructions from this person, and those individuals are also likely a disruptive element, also likely causing problems for their friends, family, community, society at large, and it’s problematic. You mean he gave which instructions to the local bus driver, who is also on the informant system, but those instructions, cost lives, what’s up with that? In most cases nothing, cause the guys behind the scenes, serve no time, and do not pay a penalty, and they pull this crap on a daily basis. It’s awesome, meaning not, it’s destructive, and destroys society.

Some of this sounding familiar? (Targeted Individuals) The legitimate Threat Assessment Files, are something, I myself would deem suitable and appropriate, provided they are being done by a legitimate agency, that is cognizant of the scope, and range of the situation. The revamp of the informant system, either includes the background stuff that is ongoing, or it’s a fail in advance. School bus drivers, Fire persons, ambulance workers, civil servants, all provide useful, needful, services, but get them under the informant system, and those dealing can turn deadly, or problematic, for the society, or for those at large.

Take Care, just one more fun update in a series.

July 10, 2013 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Gang Stalking | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Revamping the informants

Revamping the informants
(The informant system does not want to be sued)

The informant system and the study of it is truly interesting. also the informant system does not want to be sued. Recall, I first begun this journey, trying to discover what was happening and occurring to Targeted Individuals, and why they were being Gang Stalked. Upon discovering it was not ‘Vigilant Gangs’, or what have you, the investigation turned to the Threat Assessment Team files, informant system, agency operations, and Remote Neural Monitoring, Mind Control, Electronic Harassment. A world of light, and I do mean light research later, I am clear that there is so much more to this, some stuff, that can not be blogged about at this time, if ever. In the mean time, what can be blogged about is this, the informant system that is out there, as it relates to society as a whole, does need to be revamped.

There are legitimate situations occurring, such as, well this person has a marker, medium risk, and at this time we feel only to be seen or viewed in pairs. That situation, should only be for a specific amount of time, the person should be reviewed, and not deliberately provoked on an ongoing and reoccurring basis, to ‘keep the case, files going’. Such a waste.

The informant system in the background, and other sources are responsibly keeping such things going, deliberately provoking, banging into people, giving instructions to the local informants, who could be anyone, cause people are getting onto the actual informant system, for simple things, and then they do what they are advised or bidden to do, even if it’s harmful or detrimental to others. Tell lies, bang into others, accidents, and a thousand other perversities.
https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/rachel-hoffman-deadly-
dealings/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/throwdown/
http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking09/Attica_Informants.html

http://www.snitching.org/2009/11/recruiting_new_informants.html

Agencies also play a deliberate role, some of which has been previously documented. I am going to post a clip from Control Factor, and then the case of John St Clair Akawi, Vs NASA,    Part2  then the DT Stockton documents, and you can read up a bit more about what individuals are capable of. Once a person is listed for monitoring, a variety of sources, can enter their situations, even without a Threat Assessment File, some have these situations ongoing. Part 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdyOOyUVopM

Control Factor. =In the movie he is speaking or talking about evoked potential, and how the human brain has been mapped, and how we can be manipulated, or controlled at a distance. This movie is worth watching, that is what can be mentioned. Please see previous articles, Robot Sentient Research Project.

Responsibility

I want these individuals, that are a part of these mini, conspiracies to be eligible to be in the incorrect situations, doing the incorrect things, meaning, I want them to be responsible for their actions. I also want a modicum of world peace, but that is unlikely to occur, or happen, at this moment. Instead, charging each person, and affecting them financially, when they are part of these mini conspiracies, isn’t the incorrect thing, but charging each informant, is a waste of space and time and energy. Most are just doing what their handler told them, or what the police chief told them, or what their parole officer told them, and so forth, and on, and on it goes. They take directions, primarily. So enable those giving the directions, to be a part of the process. Yes indeed. The handlers want to have them systemically destroying someone’s life, that’s fine, enable them to be included. Won’t want them to feel, left out.

The handlers can take individual responsibility, right back to the local informants, monitoring units, what have you. Then you can also at times go even one level deeper than the handlers, and sometimes, all too often that is where the problem lies, but that is also where the funding lies, and the means to continue these operations. If you can’t go after them morally, or ethically, and you can, but it takes time, go after them financially instead.

The revamp of these situations needs to occur. The laws can all be passed, but without reinforcement, laws at times are useless. Fines and penalties, might be the way to go. As it is now, these informants do the dirty, often what they are directed, then they get protected at times, other times they are asked to take the fall. It’s a serious waste of space.

Revamp the system, include the fee, fines, penalties, but then act on it. When the individuals giving the directions, the ones that are directly correlated, when they are exposed, asked to pay their fines, and fees, then maybe it will make sense.

That’s what I think needs to occur, that’s part of my feedback, and recommendation for this system.

July 7, 2013 Posted by | Awareness, CIA, Citizen Informants, Gang Stalking, Informants | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Informant System -2

The Informant System

I am wondering about which potions in society if any are banned once someone is on the informant system?

I am really wondering this, some of them have parole officers, some have nothing overt except, the ability and capacity to be activated any time, they wish them to be. The question again is, which postions in society if any are banned from the informant system?

Eg.If you are an informant, are you banned from these positions, and if so should you be?
Lawyers, doctors, Kings, Presidents, Politicians, Law Makers, Nurses, Police Officers, Transit Workers, Ambulance Drivers, the whole society of positions, but the top one’s at first glace made sense, these ones made sense to me, because they are obvious out front, don’t get me wrong, having the maintenance man on the informant system wasn’t a good look either, eg. For Targeted Individuals who remember who they use to use or utilize, to enable people to be in our apartments when we were out, but let’s start with the more obvious positions.

Lawyers- We trust them to give us information and advise, eg. Let’s say you are suing a company, or you committed a crime, or didn’t commit a crime. Let’s say they give you the absolutely incorrect advise, or encourage or enable you to be in the incorrect situations, such as being on the informant system, then what? Can they be trusted, and should their specific positions of trust be beyond reproach, when you join the bar, should being on the informant system be ineligible?

Doctors- Should your family physician be eligible to be on the informant system, what if they switch your medical records, history, provide inaccurate information, and advise. Can you trust them, if they are on the informant system?

Kings/Queens -Should they be eligible to be on the informant system? They make the laws, rules, and regulations for some socities, and if on the informant system, then that is where the money will go in some cases, and that is who will truly be making the laws, should Kings, Queens, Future Kings, Queen’s potentials be on the informant system, is this the actual situation.

People who can be activated anytime, who are eligible to create, laws, rules, and regulations, that are contrary to the people in the situation, because their handlers can request this of them, at any time, and most feel compelled to be compliant. I think anyone in these situations, or arriving in these situations, should be checked fully. There should be something in the constitution of nations, that prevents this from happening? Should the eligible list be updated for those arriving into the throne positions, based on who is and who is not on the informant system, for Kings, and Queens around the globe? Considering the positions that they fulfill, if it’s not already a law, then should it not be?

Presidents, Politicians, Law Makers-Should they be eligible to be on the informant system? They make the laws, rules, and regulations for society.

Should they be eligible to be activated at any time? Handlers can pull these people up, and request they create unjust laws, or policies to suit an agenda, and they do. Should their be something in the constitution of nations, that prevents this from happening?

Nurses, Police Officers, Fire Fighters, Transit Workers, Ambulance Drivers, They touch base with the public, sometimes we can not avoid contact with this sector of society, and other civil servants, if they are on the informant system, they can make stuff up, create false reports, provide unsuitable services, and just really get innocent people in trouble, with false Threat Assessment Team Files. They can even tell lies to send people to jail, these possitions are vital, and extreamly trust worthy, and they should be above reproach, if there are not already laws, preventing individuals in these positions, being on the informant system, being activated, and taking instructions, then there should be, because I don’t want armed public servants being in these situation, or individuals that have to provide care, or emergency rescue services, being in such a position.

I would like to see the laws changed:

1. You are on the informant system fine, you are no longer eligible to be in this situation of trust or authority, because it’s a conflict of interest, curtail or suspend the exposure the individual can have with the informant system while in these situations and positions of trust.

2. Specific positions may or may not be eligible to be held, because they are such a situation or conflict of trust. I am pretty sure, back in the day, positions of trust, and royal positions, could not be held while being on the informant system, and there was a reason for this, also if you pass a law while on the informant system, and the law becomes null and void after, because it was discovered that you were on the informant system, then it’s a conflict of interest. The law could potentially become null and void.

3. I do not want public servants of any kind who are taking on the side instructions from the informant system, I don’t want my apartment entered because they got these little behind the scence instructions, I don’t want my fire, or delivery service delayed, because they get these little on the side instructions, or they get instructions to enable a building to burn to the ground. I don’t need it, don’t want it, will not put up with it. The situation must change, and as such those on the informant system must be reviewed, for conflict, and eligibility, when in any and all such positions of trust and authority.

I would like to see a revamp of the system, and the situation, I would like to see it change.

July 1, 2013 Posted by | Awareness, control, Informants | , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Conspiracy & Indictment

Conspiracy & Indictment

I think we really need to go after those on the informant system that are systemically destroying innocent lives. I really want to see them at every level be held accountable. I don’t care if it’s close relatives, co-workers, community workers etc., those taking instructions knowing from an informant system, that gives them instructions to systemically remove someone from their outcomes should be billed as a conspiracy, and dealt with and handled the exact same way.

A Conspiracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_%28crime%29

In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act must also have been undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offence). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability but may reduce their sentence.

Therefore if the individuals in your life are taking additional instructions to get into argument, physically get into altercations, say things of an untrue nature that might adversely effect the individual, they are part of a conspiracy, and ever increasingly in most countries, that is punishable by the law.

The informant class and what they do, the lies they tell, the incidents they cause are nothing but conspiracy. Most targets go after them at a community level, but what should also be done is a review of the series of discussion, and conversations that go on with these individuals, and the local monitoring units.

Most of these individuals are on the informant system, most have records, many are will to do the worst things to an innocent person. Any plot outside of the normal guidelines of the Threat Assessment Files, need to now be reviewed a little closer. These incidents are not harmless, these instructions these individuals are being given, to act out, and act upon are life ruining, systemic destruction of the individuals. They are nothing but problematic, and they need to be reviewed, very carefully. These instructions that they often get, from the local monitoring teams, their informant handlers, or whoever is in contact with them are life destroying, and they are pre-planned, thus conspiracy, and I want to see the community move forward with looking into this angle and aspect of it.

Chief of police, -or informant handler, or local monitoring unit, a typical kind of conversation they might have with someone close to the target, Now Jamie this is what I want you to do, the next time you are in a situation with this guy, I want you to set him up, I want you to make him look crazy, start saying a bunch of shit, like but your’ acting weird today eh, your seem strange, your’ making me uncomfortable, try to get him irritated, so that he can get into an argument with you, or act out, if he hits you even better, and just document all this stuff, even if it’s not the actual thing.

Jamie:

He’s clear they are setting the guy up, but he’s clear it’s the police, or his informant handler, or the local monitoring units asking this, and as per his parole, he is required to now be a part of the informant system, and that is what he is agreeing to, he is clear that this is dirty, but he’s clear that he being used and utilized in this capacity.

Wither Jamie is clear that the chief, the handler, or the local monitoring units are going after this guys credibility, what may not be clear is that behind the scene, maybe the guy upset someone, filed a lawsuit against his company, or has something they want, or might even simply not be on the informant system themselves, and they are just using Jamie, and several others in this persons life to systemically remove them, from their outcomes.

The same group might also be in touch with Phylis, she is also an informant in the persons life, they now active her, or reactivate her.

Chief, or informant handler, or local monitoring unit

Now P this is what you are going to do, just tell the guy he looks a little spaced out, airy, maybe that her’s acting paranoid, or maybe you suspect he’s maybe using drugs, just document everything.

Phylis for her part is clear that she’s being asked to make the guy seem funny,  but she thinks it’s ok because this is what she’s being asked to do, maybe they just want the guy to seek some help.

Chief, informant handler, or local monitoring unit

Now Mira, I want you to do this, just do this, you got this neighbour here, everytime you see the guy outside, just report that he’s acting weird or strange, maybe you feel that your kids are at risk, everytime you see him, your’ going to say and document that he was acting weird, and maybe the guy needs to seek some help.

Mira: Has been an informant for year, is clear on what she is doing, but is only clear on her part, does what’s instructed, as she has a thousand times, because this is what they are required to do, and if it’s these individuals asking, who are affiliated with the police, or parole officer, or local monitoring units, she will do it.

Chief of police, local monitoring units, or handler, or even parole officer

Jeff you are just going to do this, your new best friend is dean, and you are just going to visit him, and when your their, just confirm that the guy was acting weird you know, looking off into space, maybe staring at you, you know, making you feel uncomfortable. Make sure it get’s reported back and documented.

Jeff is likely this sketchy low life that works for the police on a regular basis, in one capacity, and in one regards, he’s a local community rapist, child molester, and someone the police hold dear, cause he does the odd job for them, that can’t be on the records, or on the files. He’s fully willing to destroy this guy, infect his reputation, or even the person himself, whatever these people need to destroy this guy, cause that’s what he does, that’s what he’s
done a thousand times before, and will likely do a thousand times again.

Chief of police, handler, or local monitoring unit, or even parole officer

Staf: When you are in these situations with this guy, just tell him he’s acting weird, like maybe he’s got weird eye gestures or something, maybe he’s staring off into space, doing weird things with his hands, tell him you feel uncomfortable, and that maybe he needs to see someone.

Now there are probably dozens of other little players, employers, your public servants, who then get similar instructions, the guy has been acting out, acting weird, may be a threat to himself or others, medium risk, only to be seen in pairs.

That’s how they legitimize these files that go on for years, they are dirty, deceiving, Judas class, but then you already knew that, yourself. Between these deliberate individuals, these informants that are a part of the persons life, it’s the death of a thousand little deceptions.

These are some of the deceptions the dirty ones that go on, to keep a Targeted Individual in the incorrect situation, this is a conspiracy against their life, and it’s no longer suitable, across the globe, these situations are being played out on a daily basis, and they need to be addressed in the manner and the capacity to which they impact the society and the individual.

When a society, a community is littered with such situations, social interactions are infected, it tears at and destroys the very fiber, and fabric of the society, and this needs to be curtailed. For years it’s really come down to the Targeted Individual community to bring these situations, these conspiracies to light, it’s been years of research into these topics, but this is what I would like to see occur. I would like to see these conspiracies address and dealt with the way that suits, and makes sense. The informant system is doing nothing good, and needs to be changed and revamped. Part of these conspiracies, which we have at times called Gang Stalking, need to be addressed, and dealt with at the highest spiritual, and legal levels possible.

I would like to see changes to these structures, and to how these case files are documented. I want to ensure that those documenting, and bearing false reports are uniquely identified, even if it’s just anonymously. I would like to see changes to who can and can not be on the informant system. When you have lawyers, doctors, politicians, decision makers, who can be advised to side a certain way, pass this specific law, or make this specific decision because they are informants, or on the informant system, you have an undue influence, that is problematic, or even deadly for that society, and individual to whom or where it is aimed.

Indictment

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment

An indictment (/ɪnˈdaɪtmənt/ in-DYT-mənt), in the common law system, is a formal accusation that a person has committed a crime. In jurisdictions that maintain the concept of felonies, the most serious criminal offence is a felony; jurisdictions that lack the concept of felonies often use that of an indictable offence—an offence that requires an indictment.

Legal action might not be the incorrect thing in dealing with these situations, but is your lawyer free of subversion, are they free of the informant system, are the prosecutors? In the U.K. where Masons and their undue influence became such a problem, they literally had to pass laws, which might have required Mason affiliations to be revealed, as they might have, undue influence.

Should a similar law be passed when dealing with those on the influence, considering how intrenched this is in the background, throughout the society?

They night not want to reveal their identities, or affiliation, but maybe it’s time the laws protected those, that might be unduly affected, or destroyed, by the infection that is the informant system.

June 23, 2013 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Baiting, Citizen Informants, Conspiracy, Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

It’s a ‘G’ thing baby

I wanted to title the article how money get’s wasted, and how innocent people end up in these situations, but I just went with the more cool, urban sounding title, cause that’s the sort of day it’s been.

Now have you ever wondered what would happen if you could be a fly on the wall of one of these incidents? Have you ever wondered what would happen if you could truly turn into the craziness behind the scenes? Yeah me neither, so I present to you this totally, totally fictional scenario. 🙂

The person being monitored is an innocent person, but to everyone we have to make it look like this person is doing nothing suitable. To affix this end, we need to get the persons relatives, and friends, and family if they have any to have a consistent conversation about how the person isn’t doing anything suitable. We want to create a consistent pattern. So just get them to point out that the person has no income coming in, or is without means, even if it’s not true, just keep persisting with plot points that crate this scenario. Remember for these lists part of the update that occurs is they need to show targets, can’t take care of themselves, bill payment late, or not able to meet financial responsibilities.

I have even been prevailed to listen to other fictional scenarios, where they try to paint the person as grievously disabled, but that would actually mean they can’t even buy groceries wouldn’t it? Ralph, yeah *Lenny, then you can’t list that, great, you mean that update can’t go through.

Second scenario, ok this person has a blog, and posted a link to a major website as a reference, but that major website has views that are not appreciated, so we go the person and their website listed in a terrorist database, for simply posting a link. Now that we have them in this database, we can legally monitor them for years at a time, and advise everyone around them, that they are affiliated with terrorists, also we can now list those in affiliation or conjunction with the original person as being in conjunction with terrorists.

Don’t believe these scenarios can happen? Don’t worry about it.

Next scenario, it’s been that sort of day. The person is not co-operating became aware of the stalking and the monitoring, and that we want to make this person resemble that they are without means. Just document that they aren’t doing anything suitable, the target refused to be cooperative that morning, mentioned that they were the artistic type, and creating is a part of the process, misjudging the process was ineligible, and a different sort of person was required. Evidently being cognizant that one is monitored is not the correct thing, so that one doing the monitoring decided to put the person into a drug informant database. Now the person not only has no drug history whatsoever, but the person is anti-drugs, meaning they have a history of being against drugs and drug usage, but it was that sort of day, so this person literally put a completely innocent person with no drug history into such a database. Cause that’s what kind of day it was for (this guy) references the idiot putting an innocent person in the database, he was going to teach that smart ass a lesson. Don’t think such a thing could happen, keep reading.

So the person in this totally fictional scenario is now in a second database, but only one problem, the person has a Threat Assessment profile that doesn’t match, and the person is an admin for an international website, so the guy was was having that sort of day, (the idiot), ends up putting a low life informant handler Mike somebody onto  the profile of the original person (the innocent person) who they have now falsely put into a database. (I was still trying to follow (listen in) at that point.) The profile can not be out of sync or whack, so the Mike guy is also a government agent for the American government, as well as an informant, so he the Mike guy, that they are trying to use to take over this persons profile, can’t be listed in the terrorist database, so this person, (the innocent person) had to have their information temporarily out of the terrorist database.  Remember completely fictional scenario.

So once the person was in the new database, the account or profile take over was attempted, the guy Mike can’t be in a terrorist database, but he is a drug using, male whore literally, as well as an agent. So now they have to protect their own, but getting him unlisted in the database, remember, they will destroy innocent people, but their own they save. I kid you not.

So then the innocent person, has to have this drug use stuff verified, so this is what they can do remotely now. They can remotely verify if a person has THC, cocaine, and other hard drug use history, they do a check, the remote machine shows the innocent person has no trace of anything, and it shows if those around have any history, use, and length of time.

*(Along with drug use, there is also a machine that can determine paternity at a distance, so the babies watch out. No seriously, they can determine paternity at a distance, so in cases of rape, and other need to know, the mothers, and fathers information can be determined in a matter of minutes, and listed.) Lastly they can determine HIV health statuses at a distance, and who should and should not be listed or tracked in databases, this can all be done remotely, and what police, and other agencies now have access to is interesting, and should be appreciated, and applauded in some cases. That’s the good aspect of this story.

Ok so the innocent person gets a clean bill of drug use health, but the idiot is still determined to manually imput false information, because that smart ass is going to get their comeuppance, I kid you not. To list the person as a drug user, you have to falsify their health records, cause that’s the only way it was going to work, because the persons heath records show a history of no drug usage, and other situations, that are the opposite of the scenarios this guy(the idiot) was trying to perpetrate.

Medical records could be updated or falsified without calling in a their party, the their party refused to falsify health records, and for once those around the innocent person refused to confirm any sort of drug use. (Let’s just say the innocent person, is somewhat anti drugs.) 🙂

So once the medical records could be falsified and the person could be added to the other databases, the records had to be re updated, their guy Mike had to be removed from the person profile. The persons profile had to be updated with, oh wait their trying another person a Katherine instead of a Mike, another agent of theirs, but this person also does not match the profile, so they finally had to add back the original person, (the innocent person.) Now that the original person had to be unlisted from the terrorist database, to get the Mike guy in, once the Mike guy was removed, the original person is who they are having problems adding back to the terrorist database.

The attempt to falsify medical records set off an alarm, and an adjudicator had to be called in, there were other fun things happening in the background, but that was the jist of it.

The cost to the tax payers manageable, the use of material for a certain specific website invaluable. The laughter, the goofiness, the means an idiot will go to, and through to ruin an innocent person, priceless, and please remember this is a totally fictional scenario. 🙂

But that’s what’s kind of day it’s been.

*Lenny might not be a real name.

January 8, 2013 Posted by | Awareness, Black female, Citizen Informants, Community harassment, Gang Stalking | , , , , | 1 Comment

Pride and Prejudice, and the Informant System

Pride and Prejudice, and the Informant System

Whenever the informants are around it’s as if they are speaking a different language, and it’s as if I almost need a translator or something. It’s as if they are speaking a different language in the stage, that it doesn’t even make
sense. They or often around doing the most inconsistent things, but then they often seem to think that they are doing the most suitable of things, and that’s why it does even make sense. They do the silliest things at times, again generalizing, because there is good and bad everywhere, and think that they are doing the most cleverest of things.

They remind me of Lydia in Pride and Prejudice. (The BBC version) This little twit manages to do the stupidest of things ever, along with her enabling mother.

She puts the family in harms way to the stage where it doesn’t even make sense.

She brings the family down to their lowest denominator possible, and then she  thinks that the correct things just magically happened on it’s own. Sure she went to bath, and sure she went away with Wickem to elope, but she missed the
part where she then enabled an infamous relationship, that threw everyone into the incorrect situations.

Then it was up to everyone around this little twit to fix the situation. Darcy had to step in, and put Elizabeth into the correct situation, it was suppose to be that type of situation, but Lydia, that dizt, made it into one. Thus why 5
sensible minutes was later on instituted for that other dip, Kitty. And this is why I’am saying it this way. The informant system, does not on the surface, or even the foreground, appear to be doing anything suitable for anyone in the
situations.

From a Targeted Individual stand point, these are the bains of our existence. They stalk us, they destroy our stuff, they ruin the things around them, then they think it’s the funniest thing ever. Myself and other targets have been at
times made so upset by these people it does even make sense at times, but they keep doing the exact same thing. then they think that they have pulled off something brilliant, which doesn’t even make sense to us. What no, you didn’t,
you pulled off a Wickem, you managed to snare yourself a Wickem, truly, really, how nice for you. Seriously, these bitches at times are seriously tripping. They do the most spiteful things, end of with the worst outcomes, then think that
they are doing something cleaver.

Everytime I see that Elizabeth character having to smile, and make nice with that little dip Lydia that almost destroyed the family, or watching the little twit walk ahead of her and Jane, I just think, what a dip. Then watching the Elizabeth character be nice to Wickem, the guy just needs a drop kick right, but she’s there making nice with him, and that’s what Targeted Individuals are remaining with somethings, we are left with being nice, and smiling with dip relatives, friends, associates, who have been ensnared by this stupid, freaking, system. We have to make nice, smile, fix everything the dip Lydia of a system does, or to a lesser degree Kitty, then there is the enabling mother, Mrs Bennett, who thinks that Lydia did something cleaver. We are left, meaning remaining to deal with the enabling, offices around them or officials around
them, who think these dips are doing something cleaver for the society, when in most cases, the majority of cases, they are bringing society down to it’s lowest common denominator.

So like the knowing characters in the movie, Darcy, your an ok kind of guy, Elizabeth, and the rest of them who survived the informant system, I mean the Lydia of a disaster, and Wickem that was brought into their lives, and into their worlds, then I say or mention, your ok type of people, and if you can survive such a disaster, and make something of it, you might just be ok type of people.

So for those in T.V. land, that’s the kind of situation that we have been dealing with, we have been dealing with the Lydia’s, Kitty’s, and Wickems of the world, throw in a Mary, and God, yes Mrs. Bennett, for good measure, and that is
what we have been dealing with, our camp against their camp, day in, day out.

God how we survived, is a bloody miracle. We deal with this day in day out, and that’s what it’s like to be a Targeted Individual, to survive such disaster day in day out, and to fix the stupidest things, that the Lydia’s, Darcy’s, and
Wickems, or wrothing on the world. Darcy got a mention, cause he understood the situations, it was up to him to remedy it, he understood that Wickem, was a low life scumbag was wasn’t doing anything suitable, and he should have mentioned it sooner, to his listening audience, but then he was an ok guy, cause he didn’t want to embarrass his little sister georgiana, or seem like that type of guy to put everything out there in the open.

That type of disaster is what we deal with, and fix all the time as Targeted Individuals, then we are left, remaining with saying, we survived. We lived to tell the tail.

If Elizabeth and the rest, of them can survive the informant system, ie. Lydia of a disaster that she wroth, then we can survive the Lydia’s, and the Wickems of the world. The hard part is learning to smile, when they roll around in the
brilliance of their actions, thinking that they have done the most brilliant things, knowing full well it’s otherwise.

http://www.zazzle.com/indigo_ribbon

Maybe a hero will save us. Darcy if you are out there, the world could use a couple of hero’s, if not, Elizabeth, girl, female, you will do ok for yourself.

October 28, 2012 Posted by | Awareness, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The DT STockton Document Reexamined.

The DT STockton Document Reexamined.

Several years ago someone under the name of DT STockton posted a document about his investigation into the informant system. Quite a bit of it agreed with information that I had already come to agree with, but how much could be verified?

Do the informants really have communication via a special frequency? Are most people in major cities on the informant system?

Are some of the businesses being taken over by government agents?

Informants

http://gangstalkingterrorism.wordpress.com/

The answer to the above questions, in my opinion, estimation, and investigation is confirmed, and then some. The world is scarier than we realize. To investigate any of this information, without being familiar with the informant system or government agencies is almost impossible. For a normal, fairly sane person to try to investigate the information can be cumbersome, but in this community of Targeted Individuals, to stay alive and survive, many have had to become minor investigators in their own capacities.

Threat Assessment Teams, the topic has been covered several times, that’s what the community was up against, for case history, I give you the Jane Clift case.

Her case is exactly what most people on a minor scale are up against. In Jane’s case she was advised she was getting listed as medium risk, only to be seen in pairs, and that a warning would come up every time she was in any situation.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/?s=jane+clift+

The case is what we end up seeing in the Gang Stalking community, on a minor level.

Eg. Threat Assessment Team, evaluated her as a danger to the community, in her case it was the local council, in other cases HR get’s the person listed, however it happens. Once the person is listed, they are monitored by the local monitoring units, or individuals in the community, in her case she was monitored for trying to be a good citizen. Others have complained about monitoring for arguments with those in the community, or workplace, who have the know how to get individuals listed.

Once the local monitoring unit is called in, you have positions in some countries, such as community advisors, unit commanders, shift commanders, who are responsible for the monitoring, of the individuals. The unit and shift commanders or in some cases “case workers” as one liked to fancy himself as, are responsible. In too many cases some are criminals themselves, and organize a deliberate campaign of harassment, against the individuals.

Thus people on the street are literally being given directions, the ones that are on the informant system, or in some simple cases co-workers are being given a warning about the person. Mostly however it’s the informant class, and the government agent class that create the problems for innocent individuals.

Deliberately trying to destroy their lives, and removing them all too often from their existences.

NOw try coming into any of the above positions without being on the informant system, or agency and those in charge have no idea what to do with you. It would be almost impossible to get into a community advisor role, unit commander role, or shift commander role without being in one of these situation, but if you could get into one of these roles, slip in unnoticed, or accidentally come into the role, then those who interface with these units, have no idea how to interact with the individual, because the systems are now creepishly designed to work with the informant system. Period.

Government Agents

Energy

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/energy/

Whenever I read the case of John St Clair Akwei, and what governments are capable of doing, or allegedly capable of doing as per the lawsuit that the signal intelligence agent filed against the government, pertaining to aspects of his work, it always sounds so futuristic, so Matrix like in some ways, but it’s a lawsuit that’s been there for over 15 years now?

The stuff that could be done back then, would scare most people now, but image what they are capable of now, if brain mapping, remote neural monitoring and other situations were common place when he worked for NASA.

http://www.whale.to/b/akwei.pdf

John St Clair Akwei VS Nasa

john-st-clair-akwei-vs-nasa/

[quote]
Detecting EMF fields in humans for surveillance A subject’s bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment, NSA cryptologists can
remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can be decoded into a person’s brain-states and thoughts. The subject is then perfectly monitored from a distance.

NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the Signals Intelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA’s computers will then pinpoint and track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out and track anyone in the U.S.

NSA’s Signals Intelligence use of EMF brain stimulation NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF brain stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MK Ultra program of the early 1950′s, which included neurological research into “radiation” (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development.
[/quote]

Tracking a person via their emf fields. Brain mapping technology that allows you to map a persons mind, but at a distance. [quote]

The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated brain mapping can monitor all the electrical activity in the brain continuously. The NSA records aid decodes individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for
national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for Brain-to-computer link (in military fighter aircraft, for example).

For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain’s auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use
this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations, characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject’s brain and show images from the subject’s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject’s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can
send images direct to the visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves.

NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.
[/quote]

Remember it’s been claimed that this stuff has been available for decades. The lawsuit that brought this technology to light was almost 20 years ago, and this is a person who worked for the agency, and I think with this technology.

If this is being used remotely and at a distance on people, how many people in society might not even be aware that such programing has been used on them until it’s too late?[quote]

Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the U.S. since the 1940′s.

The NSA, Ft. Meade, has in place a vast two-way wireless RNM system which is used to track subjects and non-invasively monitor audio-visual information in their brain. This is all done with no physical contact with the subject. RNM is the ultimate method of surveillance and domestic intelligence. Speech, 3D sound, and subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject’s brain (bypassing the ears), and images can be sent into the visual cortex. RNM can alter a subject’s perceptions, moods, and motor control. [/quote]

Frequency

The informants are contacted on the street with a special frequency, and they do get instructions, if you could hear the stuff they are advised, literally walk really close to this person, we just want to see if he reacts, we just want to see if she has a reaction to it, mostly the average person would just do what they are told, because most do not see the bigger picture. They are innocent in a way, but some are pretty specific, eg. Driving close enough to cause an accident, deliberately, some are all too knowing, and cognizant, meaning fully aware. It’s a scary balance, and I can now personally attest to the fact that they do have in most cases, directions that are being conveyed to them. A frequency is being utilized, and that’s pretty scary.

Could a variety of individuals be on the informant system? I mean to be an informant don’t most people have to be criminals? It’s pretty scary, because in most people’s mind’s informants are criminals, at least in my mind they were, but in today’s society, they get all sorts onto the informant system. I do feel that some groups are targeted more than others, just based on attitudes and mentalities of those that are deliberately assigned with ensuring school children get placed on the informant system. High School and the informant system, jr high and the informant system. Yes that’s the fate of some of our school children, isn’t that nice.

You would think that people have to commit some major crime, but even with just the items I’ve researched online, eg. Rachel Hoffman.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/rachel-hoffman-deadly-dealings/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/throwdown/

Or even the girl who got stopped for parking tickets, had no drug use or drug selling history, from a small town, and was placed on the informant system as a confidential informant. In that specific case, her dad went back with her to the station, and removed her from the informant system, in that case she had a lawyer in the family. The point is innocent people who have no idea how this working, are being destroyed, converted, etc. So when a document appears online explaining that many in major cities are already on the informant system, don’t be surprised, because the above example, was from a small town, and if the small towns are this far gone, then that becomes problematic.

http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking09/Attica_Informants.html

http://www.snitching.org/2009/11/recruiting_new_informants.html

{November 10, 2009
Posted by Alexandra Natapoff at 06:27 AM
Recruiting new informants

Here’s a revealing article in the Buffalo News: Walking thin line in Village of Attica: Would-be informant says police coerced her into cooperation. It’s about Bianca Hervey, a 20-year-old college student who got pulled over by police for failing to pay her traffic tickets. The police threatened to put her in jail for the night, unless she agreed to become a drug informant. Although Hervey did not use drugs or have any connections to the drug world, police told her it didn’t matter–she could still work as a snitch and try to set people up. Frightened of going to jail, Hervey signed the informant agreement. When she told her father, attorney Richard Furlong, what had happened, however, he “went ballistic.”

Furlong went to the police and to the City of Attica and complained about the recruitment of young people into the world of drugs, but the police and the Village Board refused to change the policy.

This story illustrates how snitching has quietly become such an immense part of the criminal justice system. Many cities have policies like Attica’s, in which police can recruit any potential offender as a drug informant–even a 20-year-old guilty of nothing more than a traffic violation. It was this same
type of policy that led to the death of 23-year-old Rachel Hoffman in Tallahassee, Florida, and triggered Florida’s ground breaking legislation on the subject of informant-creation. See post: Florida’s “Rachel’s Law” offers some protections for informants.}

Alexandra Natapoff, has done some wonderful research into the informant system, she is a lawyer, and the above summary is from her. Her statistics more importantly, back up much of what has been said about the numbers, and figures of those on the informant system in most major cities, and some communities.

In summary, it’s not paranoia when they are out to get you, as the saying goes, and it’s not paranoia to believe that too many people are on informant systems, and in or a part of government agencies. The things Targeted individuals blog about, satellite tracking, etc, that’s common knowledge, because their are articles which cover, how local police and others have access to these minor technologies, and have had access for years. The items less well known, but that have also been pretty common are things like the John St clair Akwei case, and the technologies used there. The figures on the informant system are understated, to say that have or above that in cities are on the informant system, is understated.
To say that school children are being stopped, interrogated for minor things, and then placed on the informant system, similar to how Bianca Harvey was, is not an exaggeration. “Weed” children is not a good look, and it’s also, one of the ways these kids in today’s society are getting themselves into these situations, but also at times they are foolishly, and unwisely being set up by their little friends, who are already on the informant systems.

October 22, 2012 Posted by | Awareness, CIA, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Community harassment, Conformity, conspiracies, Cults, Echelon, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking | , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The Unmentioned

                                                                                  The Unmentioned

This is a post for all those evils and atrocities out there that are being committed. The things that are happening under the cover of the hidden. The things that are hidden from the public scope, the things that the public is not allowed to understand, the horrors, the silent screams, the heartbreaks, the times you pray silently for rescue that simply does not happen, the souls that have died, while living through some of the worst atrocities.

This post is for all those who do not have a voice for themselves, who can not speak on their own behalfs. This is posted in the hopes of shining some light onto these cruelties, those who do evil in this world, and the stupidity that just as harmful, or even more harmful that allows this stuff to function and to happen.

For all the lies you tell, the truth is now told. You are a vermin that the world does not need, you are the evils, that need to be removed from the face of the planet, you are the itch, the disease that humanity will never be able to scratch or cure. You are that darkness and that void that has filled innumerable lies, the cruelty that breaks the human heart, will, and spirit. You are the taker of innocence that little boys and girls do not need to lose, before they enter adulthood.  You are the screams and night terrors they can not describe, or even quantify. You are the horror that humanity does not need.

This is why, you were designed to do the good in this world, you were designed to walk amongst men, and do the good in this world, but your will has become vile, an evil, corrupt and a cruel thing, we will bear you witness. You were never meant to become what you have become to so many of us, this evil thing that we don’t want or need in our lives, in our
existence, this things that brings humanity down to it’s lowest common denominator.

You take the light and the innocence from the world, and you do it so subtly, that most people would never know the difference, you are the false face of goodness, and the true hearts of darkness. The pretty faces, and places that we are all to ascribe to, and the heights that we are to try to ascend to, if only your true depths were fully known, if only they could truly and fully be shown. That is too often the way of the world in our society, the pretty things of the world, are the most unbeautiful, the things that seem the most effulgent too often of late conceal hearts of terror, horrors and darkness,
that can not be mentioned, that can not be told, that if even suspected, would leave horrors unknown.

This is for all the things unmentioned that those without a voice go through, this is a tribute, an anthem, for them, a voice for those without a voice, for those who truly can not speak for themselves, those too young, too innocent, too scared, too bound, this is a tribute for you, for the prices you pay behind the scenes. To the fake things of this world, the things that look effulgent, beautiful, wonderful, to the false gods, you will not be worshiped in this post, you are despised for all the evils, sins and corruptions you perpetrate, for all the horrors, evils, and unknown, unmentioned, sins that you commit. This post is where you may be mentioned.

For those who pretend to be our friends, but all they leave behind is a world full of darkness and deceit, your facade of goodness is all that is shown, but behind the scenes, do the people ever hear the silence, do they acknowledge the screams, wishing and hoping that your true faces could be scene, that your insect skins could be reflected, for who and what they are.

To those out there, you know who you are, you endure on a daily basis, you live horrors that will never truly be known, that will likely never be spoken, and whose horrors will possibly be forgotten someday, but never forgiven, until they are truly acknowledged. This post is what I can do on your behalf, and I do so freely, for all those who suffer in silence, your
unmentionables, are mentioned here.

March 23, 2012 Posted by | Abuse, activism, Awareness, Bullying, Censorship, Children, Civilian Spies, control, Gang Stalking, harassment, Informants | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment