Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

When I am world ruler 2

When I am world ruler 2.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/tag/world-ruler/

Ok my last post was fun, about when I am world ruler and the things that I wish to implement in the society. I want all these changes that will help humanity, one of the first things that I would do is ensure that the family unit was the first and foremost thing. I would ensure that it was the heart and soul of my futurist society, that I wish to see created.

First and foremost I want to create a knowledgeable society, where people are well educated. I want to create a knowledgebase that will last beyond this plain of existence, I want something that will exist past space, time,
distance. I would like to create a knowledgebase similar to or something that could surpass the Akashic records.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akashic_records

I want to also create a Teleporting, time travelling society. When I am world ruler technology will be a huge focus, and will be well funded. My fantasy in part is to own a really cool R & D department/division. I want to have something that would create one of the most technologically advanced society, on the face of the planet and beyond.

I would seriously create an alternative cash exchange system, one that would be a little more stable, and one that actually felt good to use. Something like an intergalactic, interplanetary, multidimensional cash exchange system.
It could happen.

I want to find the cure for cancer and other incurable diseases, and distribute the cure to those who are eligible for a reasonable fee, or for free. It’s a dream, but it could happen. In my spare time, over the last several years, I have done nothing but independently research a variety of such items, yeah it’s a fun hobby on the side, and who knows, when it will pay off for humanity.

I want to create these amazing buildings, that are some of the most secure, they will have the most secure login’s, and they will be able to understand who is in the building at all times. They will be some of the safest, most self contained, environmentally friendly places to live.

I will also create this force, this league of extraordinary individuals. A Royal league of some sort. Really cool wardrobes, and unlike the informant system, which has brought down humanity to it’s lowest common denominator,
the force will work towards elevating humanity, and doing something good for the planet and beyond. Their roar would be heard, that’s one of the things that I would like to do when I am world ruler.

I would like to locate the missing and exploited children across the face of the planet, and bring them home safe. When I am world ruler, I will find a way to reunite families, and keep children safe.

Finally when people are truly doing the evil in the world, you know those lowest common denominators like I’ve previously described, I would have them showing up as evil, no matter where they went on the face of the planet or
beyond, so that innocent people could know who and what they were dealing with.

May 12, 2012 Posted by | Astral Plane, Awareness, Drugs, False Prophets, google | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Fallen Ones

The Fallen Ones

I thought this would be fun to write about. People are always wondering about the evil powers behind the scenes that rule the world. Some think it’s the elites, others lizards, other the CIA and other government agencies, or a shadow government, but I thought I would throw one more possibility out there.

(Now I hope this does not send all the psychiatrists drooling, but it just might.)

The bible speaks of other forces in the world, forces of good and evil. The bible early on in genesis speaks of Angels. Other worldly beings, the sons of God etc. Apparently they were assigned to take care of and to look after man on the earth. Some of them I should say were assigned to take care of and look after God’s most prized creatures, the humans.

It came to past that the sons of God saw the daughters of men and saw that they were fair, good to look upon, the sons of God forsook their places, came down to earth and took on the form of men. The took unto themselves wives from amoung the daughters of men.

http://kingjbible.com/genesis/6.htm

{That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.}

These fallen angels did not just marry the women, they taught them all sorts of arts. Some call them dark arts, some call them magics, witchcraft, etc. They taught them how to forge weapons, divining, and other arts. They also produced what were called the nephalium. Half human, half angel hybrid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephilim
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/boe

The nephelium did not do too well on the face of the earth, they were giants in most cases for one, and they ate all the human food, plus it’s rumoured humans might have been consumed, it’s all so convoluted.

Anyways it got to the stage where a lot of human lines were mixed up with the fallen ones, through generations of interbreeding, many humans had some part of them in their lines. They also taught the human race to war etc.

God not being thrilled with all this, plus the rebellion that was caused when they rebelled and decided to do this, decided to put an end to all this stuff with a flood. The rebellion that took place is rumoured to be no small rebellion, from what I have read and researched on the topic, it is said that 1/3 of his angels, rebelled. That’s a lot.

Anyways Noah who’s line was not corrupted, was asked to build the ark, the earth was flooded, and most humans were wiped out, the nephelium, some seem to have survived, and the fallen ones themselves, were apparently locked away, where they can’t cause direct actions, but they can and still do influence events on the earth.

At least that what I have read, and interpreted of events. Now in this time period, most people don’t believe in angels, God, demons, etc. Our western culture does not allow this, and except that a lot of people are still religious, they would likely lock people aware for even profession such a belief.

So if anyone has seen the movie Constantine, I think movies like this and others, are a neat depiction of some of the battles that might still be going on. The movie also brings up the fact that angels have free will, and some of this spiritual wickedness, this corruption is still happening, which would indicate that some angels might still be switching sides, etc. If some are still switching sides, then maybe some will in time remember their true calling, and switch back it is hoped.

In the mean time, we battle against not just flesh and blood, but spiritual wickedness in high places. It’s one more possibility to look into for those who believe in this stuff.

{“We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” (Ephesians 6:12)}

I do believe we are truly headed to a one world government. I also think we are headed towards a spiritual awakening, where those that were asleep to all this will wake up. The bible not only talks about the end of time, but it says that at that time, just before Jesus’s return, there will be many on the earth that do miracles, preform great acts, and they trick many into believing that they are the messiah returned.

Also since there are likely remote viewers who can go backwards and forwards in time, then that is why the bible says that no one knows the day or time of his return.

{Mark 13:32 “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.” … Matt 25:13: “Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour in which the Son of Man is coming.” … that Christ declared that He did not know the day nor the hour of His return} Matthew 24:36

I always found this strange, but the first time or near the first time, I was ever on a Gang Stalking forum, one of the targets pointed out that is likely why no one knows the date or the time. If anyone knew the date or the time of the return a remote viewer could just find it, a fallen angel could locate the time.

If no one knows, no one can access the information. No one can mind read it. No one can do evil the day before, then suddenly repent and pretend to turn all good. So people just have to keep watch.

August 16, 2010 Posted by | Awareness, Controlled society, Corruption, False Prophets, Gang Stalking, Gods, Jesus | , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

What would Jesus do?

Yeah the title sounds corny, but if you remember what this weekend is, it’s Easter weekend, and yesterday was good Friday. That’s the day the state assasinated him by nailing him to a cross, after bringing up phoney charges against him, by false witnesses. Sound familiar?

He came with a mission to help people. He was persecuted at times, until finally the state found a way to target him once and for all. They used a snitch that was a part of his company to sell him out, and along the way he had to tell the powers that be that they were corrupt and misleading the people. He would get angry at times, he also found it frustrating how people were at times. The spread rumours about him, said he had a demon, that he was crazy, a friend of sinners and publicans, they asked him all sorts of questions to try to set him up, like is it right to pay taxes? Hoping he would say no, so they could set him up.

In doing this activism, I realise that State oppression and the parasite informants don’t change that much. The same stuff that happened then, is the same stuff that pretty much happens now. The world does not change, and the people in charge know how to manipulate the people in the system. They know how to keep people in check, give them a sense of freedom, and then keep then in check in various ways.

I have been thinking about this a lot, because I am wondering what he would do about the informants? Would he try to out them, out them but subtly, or just ignore them? I have been thinking about the ways he handled himself, because I see a lot of this stuff is the same. He came across the same kind of system.

The more I see of these people’s actions and the deliberate tactics they use, the more I am reminded of his activism/ministry. I know a lot of people might not be able to relate, or this might not be there cup of tea, but if you are a target, it might not hurt to brush up on the way he handled irritating people who were spreading rumours, slander, a family that cared for him, but might not have been there for him, the way he needed, people trying to set him up, officials that were corrupt and teaching the common people all the wrong things, and Judas the snitch that would betray him.

Most times I just ignore them, but I don’t think this is the right approach, so I have been wondering what others would do. I know people always think of Jesus as peaceable, and for the most part he was, but he was not above telling the corrupt leaders what they were, what they were doing to the people, and he could hold his own.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/mat009.htm

The same type of parasites then and now. It’s fascinating, but it’s true. So that’s what I have been wondering, how did he handle being around Judas, how do you handle these snitches? How do you handle the provocation they bring, and cause, and what is the best way to deal with them?

I think you can learn a lot from the past, but I also think each activist is going to be different and you have to find ways to deal with each situation. What works for one will not work for the other, and yet we can take advise from past targets and apply them quite easily to the current situations at hand in trying to determine what to do under some circumstance.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/mat011.htm

[quote]18 For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, He hath a devil.
19 The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified of her children.[/quote]

Always trying to find something. They also called him crazy at times as well.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/mat012.htm
[quote] 14 Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him.[/quote]

Always looking for a way to bring down those who would question and challenge the system.

A lot of the stuff John Lennon said is coming back to me as well. The quote is from the US vs John Lennon.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/the-us-vs-john-lennon/

[quote]“When it gets down to having to use violence then you are playing the systems games. The establishment irritates you, pull your beard and flick your face to make you fight, because once they have you violent then they know how to handle you. “
[/quote]

They really don’t change that much, this parasitic element. I guess each person in every generation has to find their own way to deal with them, and leave what they can for the next target.

It’s interesting however, a lot does not change in the way these people think work and operate, it would be nice for once to fully win.

April 11, 2009 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Cointelpro, conspiracies, Conspiracy, Controlled society, crazy, dissident, False Prophets, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, government corruption, Informants, Isolation, Jesus, judas, slavery, slaves, Snitches, Targeted Individual | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Credibility reviews and terms

I think someone needed a little bit of free publicity so here it is. Eleanor White dropped by one of my blogs and left a comment. This post is in response to the comment that was left. I don’t want to spend too much time on this, but as I said before, I felt this issue had gone on long enough and recently choose to intervene.

[quote]I’m sorry the author of the “gang” stalking web sites and e-book can’t seem to grasp why I object to the term “gang” stalking.  I thought my reviews explained that pretty clearly.[/quote]

Eleanor, I appreciate that you, object to the use of the term. I appreciate that you and those working towards the same goal as you, want to have people discontinue the use of the term Gang Stalking.

I disagree with this. I think if you and yours wish to use the term, then please use the term for your activism. You are deterring the efforts of others, others who have had success with the term.

I have pointed out that some use the term Community Mobbing, Community Harassment, and several others to describe the same thing, and I think that is fine, as long as they get the correct message across to the audience.

[quote]I’ve been an activist for 13 years, and during three of those years, I spent some time almost every day right out in the street, discussing the crime of organized stalking and electronic harassment with the public.[/quote]

That’s great Eleanor, I have spent just under three years and I have been using the term Gang Stalking, and that has worked just fine for me and several others. If this term does not work for you, then I appreciate this. However by telling others that the preferred term is Organised Stalking, you are interfering with the rights of others to use the terms they prefer. I have now seen others on the Internet telling others that they have to use Organised Stalking now, and that is not correct or accurate.

If this is the term you prefer, then great. I think it’s wonderful that you and some of yours wish to use the term. I think that there is more than enough room in the Targeted Individual community for a variety of terms.

[quote]I tried a number of terms.  Other anti-OS activists have also tried a number of terms.

With “gang” stalking, I found that the mind of my listener immediately and consistently got the image that I was talking about being stalked by some sort of ordinary gang, such as race gang, youth gang, biker gang, or Mafia.[/quote]

Great Eleanor, I don’t know what your demographics are, and I don’t know who you come across in your activism.
Eg. Someone coming across someone from the Cointelpro era might wish to use that term. Someone coming across a demographic that is riddled with the stop snitching, informant culture, might wish to use another term, and coming across people from Eastern Europe, I find reference to Stasi to work a bit better.
I encounter a lot of younger people, I also encounter a lot of cultural diversity and I use the term that best suits the situation. Not every term will work for every person, so I use what’s appropriate and make sure that the right concept is getting across. I adapt to the situation and that works for me, because of who I am.

Maybe organised stalking worked for you, because of who you were and the types of people that you came across.

[quote]That is clearly the WRONG picture of current day organized stalking groups.[/quote]

The way you do it, yes. But for some of the demographics that I reach it’s not. There are people that like the slang Gang Stalking, and it works with some demographics. The ones that will get this culturally accepted as other methods have not worked as well. So why not work all angles? What’s the reason for trying to get rid of the term that has been a success for three years, and starting from scratch. It’s the same as if we tried to get rid of the term Targeted Individuals, it would just destroy those efforts.

[quote]I have tried “vigilante stalking” too.  That worked to some degree, but didn’t seem to paint a really clear picture in the minds of my listeners.[/quote]

Again Eleanor it’s how you present it, and who is presenting it. It’s all based on who the activist is, and the demographics that you try to reach, what works for one, does not work for another. If you look across the net, the term has reach a variety of groups, they are familiar with the term and they use it. I refuse to see that effort killed because you have a preferred term.

I have a preferred goal of getting this exposed, and I think using whatever terms work, to get the concept across. I could not use the term vigilante stalking with a straight face, because I hate the term, add all the false disinformation bs that goes with it. Another person whoever could use the term with no discomfort and probably over 85-95% success rate.

I say give them a bunch of terms. Having reviewed discussions about this, and the conversations people get up to, I see some refer to it as Cointelpro again, others as Stasi, let people use what they want to use, as long as the end message is the same, more or less and the concept get’s across, because exposure is the key.

In the modern day world Eleanor, it’s not the up to down effect that get terms introduced into society, it’s often the other way around. The terms start at a ground level, or urban level, gain popularity and go from there, that is the trend I am seeing with other terms and concepts that have become popularised and mainstream, and that is the angle that I am using.

Please don’t take this the wrong way Eleanor. You tend to be very old fashioned about certain things, and I like to take a modern approach, look for new ways to get things done, to reach and work with a modern audience. I like to use those methods and concepts, that works for me, and some others like me. This might not work for you, that’s fine.

[quote]Then Lynn Troxel originated “organized” stalking.  By FAR, that term brings the unaware listener to an accurate picture of the crime of OS, and does so quickly.[/quote]

It does not however. When I sought help, the terms and concept that worked best was community mobbing, because people have an idea of what mobbing is, and by saying it happens in the community, they got that. The same was true when I sought help at the other websites. Two of the mobbing sites based on the description I gave, immediately decided to add links to Gang Stalking websites, I emailed about 10-15 stalking sites, and they did not see the relevance to what happens to them. Think about that, those activists did not see the relevance or significance.

[quote]In the effort to first educate the public, and eventually get the crime stopped, I feel the term which creates an accurate picture of the crime, and does so quickly, is quite important to find and use.  The unaware public is not interested in taking on “another headache” or another worry, and doesn’t give anti-OS activists much in the way of attention span.  Often just seconds.[/quote]

I think if you use the most accurate term and do not add the appropriate information this does no good. I have spoken to you before about the continued effort of letting people think this is vigilantes, or right wing extremists behind this, but you keep pushing David Lawson. Oddly enough.

[quote]This is why I speak out against “gang” stalking and promote “organized” stalking.  Nothing more mysterious than that.[/quote]

I don’t know if I believe that, but it does not matter. The point is what you and the others associated with this effort are doing is killing other efforts that have gone before. Where to really have maximum effectiveness, people should have a variety of terms at their arsenal to help with getting this exposed. Many hate the term organized stalking, and do not feel that it truly expresses what is happening to them. The stalking term vs the mobbing term for example. They don’t feel that stalking even comes close to describing what is happening, and it takes the attention away from the meat and potatoes. I let people use what they want. I want to train people up to do their own thing, not be told what to do, and use. I do agree that uniformity is nice to have in some quarters, but I fully disagree in this one.

[quote]I also object to activism materials that state government is doing the stalking.  We do not have evidence, as of today, which proves that.  Such claims are part of the e-book “Bridging the Gap.”[/quote]

Oddly enough, you were happy to support David Lawson and unsubstantiated claims of vigilante stalking, but you have a problem with this. You never had more than David Lawson claiming this was done by vigilante gangs, but you never objecting to misleading people down this path, but with so much proof that government is doing this you object.

We have Tim Rice telling us that they were doing 24/7 surveillance on Journalist and others.

We have the ACLU telling us about Fusion centers and what they are doing, and about people being put under investigations. That these people will be communicating in code.

We have a billion and one articles from the Uk press telling us about the covert surveillance that individuals are being placed under, and the tactics being used, which match ours in many cases.

I have posted a passage from a police training manual about how to handle informants, and the book even says that they use a one handed sign language.

Bob the lawyer some of you all hired has said this. The success that people have had with court cases mostly involve going after the government. I speak of Donald Friedman and the FOIA released, and Jesus Medoza and what he heard back from his case, that he has blogged about.

Not to mention the book the Buzzsaw, which show how journalist go through something similar.

Plus the history of Cointelpro and the Stasi.

With all this you were willing to put forward and support a theory and book, that had the potential to get targets in trouble, but you object to hard information.

The ebook in question, just like the hiddenevil.com, have you had a chance to review that site? http:www.TheHiddenEvil.com let me know what you think. You must have just been sleeping, and missed this site.
Have evidence to show that the government could be behind this.

I think the ebook in question that you are referring to, asks the question of why would the government do this to their own citizens, and the book answers the question. Do you want books, and material looking at the issue of Gang Stalking to leave this stuff out? That does not sound right to make. I get that you making unfounded accusations is not good, but that is not the case. The books back up their theories with current research. Including research from the ACLU on modern fusion centers.

[quote]There is nothing hidden or nefarious in my credibility reviews on:[/quote]

When I fist say you and Kelly discussing this I thought oh my gosh, witch hunt. I left it as it was. I wondered how long it would be till my site and other legit sites made the witch hunt, but I left it as it was, because I knew it was coming, but I hoped the community would be smarter than that.

Those reviews are again, your opinion of what you think is good and bad, and you want others to mindlessly agree to this without thinking.

As per the email I sent you, requesting you remove my site, because I did not appreciate it there. I did not think that you had the right to label my site bogus, because you do not like alphabetical order. I did send you an email and you said if I changed the order of my listing, I might get approved, well you know what I think of that?

You are putting sites there for minor things, so instead of going after the people, these so called credibility reports allow you to go after their sites, which amounts to the same thing. You go after their sites, and then it’s all done under the guise of what’s best for the community. I really do care about this, because it’s my life, and I do need to get this stopped. Joining the dark side is not an option for me.

Case in point. I will use my site but I think there are a few others on their that should not be there.

The so called credibility review says:

Eleanor White rating:  BOGUS  (trivializes the crime)
November 21, 2008

[quote]WEB SITE:  http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Techniques.html

SITE TITLE:  Gang Stalking World

EW: This well-executed web site rates a BOGUS because it
misleads the visitor from the public into believing that
targets of organized stalking and electronic harassment are worrying about things that are trivial and not serious, and in fact common occurrences of every day life.[/quote]

The site misleads the visitors in what capacity? This is not the front page of the site, which is what people see.
Second of all, the page is in alphabetical order, because some of us who do research like it that way.

If this is your reason for calling a site bogus, how much good are these reviews actually doing for this community? Honestly, they are targeting some good sites, that could help people for minor things, which I believed was going to be the case all along.

[quote]Next notice the very first, most prominent technique this site describes.  The first item is presumably the one that causes targets of organized stalking the most grief. It is listed as “Air Stalking.”  In other words, the site cries out against aircraft stalking targets on the ground!

That concern literally shouts “paranoia” to the world.[/quote]

No really Eleanor to the educated public who can think for themselves, this shouts alphabetical order, and I wont be changing this for anyone.

Oh yeah, the other thing about these so called credibitlity reviews when you and Kelly first cooked them up was that you were going to be reviewing specific pages or sections to say what could be impoved, or why it was or was not good, instead you have used the oppertunity to use the reviews to discredit websites in whole.

Youre reviews are not saying, I don’t like websitex.com because of this page or this section, you are targeting the whole website, by picking one little section.

Eg. You primarily are picking on the techniques page for Gang Stalking World, and a picture or something, but using this to declear the whole site as bogus, notice the word you choose to use? Not Eleanor disapproves, but bogus, making people think the site has no credibility, which is not the case. It’s just like if I did this, but used the word fraud, to describe some of your websites.

If you really were interested in anything other than a witch hunt, you would have also used better words, and reviewed the pages and listed the pages specifically and not attacked the full site.

You on your website

I think the picture of the militia guy that you have on your site, just does not work for me, for various reasons. I also think the section about Terri Schindler, on your site would give people the wrong message. I know it gave me the wrong message when I first started looking for stuff that could help.

You also have things about people’s cats being tortured to death. Though I respect this, as part of the targeted individual community, are you kidding me, do you think a new site visitor might not think we are a little Lonnie for this?

I know when I first saw your site, no offense, but I was really put off, from your site and a couple of others, and stayed away from it for some time. I think your site has some good information, but you talk about giving the wrong impression. I am going to leave it at that, because I am not hear to bash your site.

If I like a site, I like to it and use that. I try to avoid bashing things, unless I think it will be detrimental to real targets, and then I take a stand.

I think if you have sites that you like, then create a website of good and approved information that you and yours can use. That’s what I do, there are so many YouTube videos that I know are not good, but I don’t attack those, the same way I don’t for the most part out agents. I just try to point people to good sites or material I think will help them.

[quote]My only purpose is to assist targets in selecting the best materials for the fight to expose and stop organized stalking.

E W

[/quote]

With all due respect Eleanor, I do not feel that you are doing this with your credibility reviews, and i definitely don’t feel that you are doing this with your members, telling people which terms they can use. It’s not cool, and it’s not right.

People should be able to use what they are comfortable with. This is very quickly becoming use the sites we say and the terms we say or be a pariah, and isn’t the point that people are already segregated in one way, why should their blogs, websites, and materials be also treated the same way?

I don’t think these are good, and when your members get called on this stuff, they accuse others of causing divisions in the community, but realistically, it’s these reviews and your members telling people which terms to use that are causing some of the problems.

I do appreciate you dropping by, at this moment there is nothing else that I feel a need to add to this conversation, if there is anything else that you would like to add, I will be happy to have you post it.

So that those interested in this discussion can read it, I will post it on the blogs.

gangstalking

*Free advertising to none credible sites removed.*

April 10, 2009 Posted by | activism, Awareness, buzzsaw, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Cointelpro, community mobbing, control, Controlled society, dissident, East Germany, Electronic harassment, False Prophets, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

False Prophets

David and David.
I was just thinking about two of the David’s that I came across during this gang stalking stuff, and the warnings about false sheppards.

I have been blogging about how impressed I was with David Icke recently and some of the stuff that he had to say. I don’t agree with all of the stuff, but that’s not what caught my eye. In an interview that he did back in 2000, he made the claim that there were several saviours in the past that exactly mirror the life of Jesus. Virgin birth, gifts at birth, angeles, miracles, crucifixin, reserrection, etc.

He slips it in quite nicely. The funny thing about the clip is he talks about people taking things at face value without questioning them. This is what he roughly says…
[The human race has allowed itself to become a human herd of sheep… and until we start questioning and asking a key question about what this guy wants me to believe….]

He also says a lot of really relavent things, then slips this in. Now for the average listener, who has no bible knowlege, it’s pretty easy to assume he knows what he is talking about. However this was the first time I was hearing of this and thought I would do some quick research. Seems that someone else had the same idea and has a site about it. Now I still want to do my own research, but some of the names that David Icke mentioned in the interview I am familiar with, and thier lives do not mirror the life of Christ.

http://kingdavid8.com/Copycat/Home.html
The site above goes over the multiple saviors that David Icke lists in his book the biggest secret on page 89. The sites saved me some research, which I still plan to do, but if you know some of your mythology, then you can pick at some of the names quite easily and realise that many of the names had lives that were nothing like the life of Jesus, as described in the bible. However the lie smuggled in with all these other interesting things almost goes unnoticed, and probably has by many.

So again that brought to mind false Prophets/Sheppards, which has been a reoccuring theme lately.

http://naffoundation.org/False%20Shepherds.htm
The website above which is a website for ritual abuse survivors talks about false sheppards and the 95% to 5% rule. They will feed you 95% truth and then 5% lies. The lies are so cleaverly slipped in with the truth that you are bound to either not catch them or believe them outright.

The site talks about the common tactics that get used.

1. Perps make themselves experts.
2. They pretend to be under attack.
3. They fight and argue with each other to get the targets confused and to choose sides.
4. They will get real targets to speak on their behalf.
5. They make up crazy stories to make real targets look crazy.
6. They try to find out info about targets so they can revictimize them.

There are several other really good points, but this brought to mind the David Lawson, the other David of gang stalking fame, and some of the sites that I first encountered.

When I first learnt about gang stalking, I heard all about David Lawson. He had written this book called terrorist stalking in America, and he had apparently travelled and infiltrated these street level stalking gangs. Apparently David Lawson, gave all the details about how they work, opperate, techniques etc. So ofcourse most targets bought into the bs. Street level vigilante gangs. The book was being sold on a site that teaches you how to steal satalight signal. As mentioned before the US government were notorious back in the 90’s for setting up those sites, to catch satalight stealing people. The site has since been changed, and he has re-written the book, this time he is blaming gang stalking on right wing extreamist and anti-government groups.

Now remember David Lawson (Agent Lawson) was to have been this detective, that had over 12 years experience, and he had travelled with these groups for over 5 years or something like that. He also was not available after writing the book so no one could ever ask him questions about it, how convient. He would later reappear in time for the new book, as I predicted he would.

Now I have no proof he’s a government agent, he could just be a really bad Private Investigator. He gave 95% truth and the really relavent part, the who is behind it, he sort of threw everyone off about. Targets like me, had to spend months, and my own money to figure it out.

Anyhoo, once I did sort of figure it out, and saw the community for what it was, it was also not hard to realise that most of the groups that had been set up, were full of perps, being run by perps, or just not very effective. I can think of one such group, and you can go back 10 months from now and things will be the exact same as when I first got online. The goal is to make sure that targets never get organised enough, and never really make any true progress. The only time progress will get made is when a real target is about to do so, then they sweep in, and steal the thunder from the real target, so that they can continue to look legit.

This does not only happen in the gang stalking community, it’s happening for recovering victims of all sorts. Many of the organisations that people think they can run to for help, were set up, taken over, or highjacked by the very same people we are trying to run from.

Jesus knew about false prophets and that we would be seeing a lot more of them in this time period. Now we always think we are going to be able to spot them right? However they are wolves in sheeps clothing. They come off as sencere, they seem knowledgeable, have a lot of airheaded followers, ok and many genuine ones, they are charismatic, leader like abilities and unless you examine them really closly, you would not know the differece between the real deal, and a false prophet.

Matthew 7:15-20

15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

So that’s something to think about. Now I am not saying David Icke is a false phrophet. I can’t even proove that David Lawson is an agent or is purposly throwing people off, all I am saying is the 95% to 5% rule should be kept in mind. Even for people that are sincere, if we are given the wrong info by those we trust, we can find ourselves in the same situation. I would also add that a false prophet would come across as really knowledgeable, open, someone you would trust.

So just be on your guard. We live in pretty crazy times to say the least. If you believe the stuff in the bible then at some point in the future, some such leader is going to come along and seem like a savour to those lost, chipped and tagged people of the planet. By that time I am sure they will have wipped out the history of Christ’s existance, thrown out enough disinfo, confused enough people, till the people don’t know what to think, and will easily fall for who ever comes down the line. 
It won’t even be that hard.
Anyhoo those were just some things that I felt were important to be mindful of. 

September 14, 2007 Posted by | david icke, False Prophets, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, harassment, Jesus, New World Order, NWO | 4 Comments