Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

The DT STockton Document Reexamined.

The DT STockton Document Reexamined.

Several years ago someone under the name of DT STockton posted a document about his investigation into the informant system. Quite a bit of it agreed with information that I had already come to agree with, but how much could be verified?

Do the informants really have communication via a special frequency? Are most people in major cities on the informant system?

Are some of the businesses being taken over by government agents?

Informants

http://gangstalkingterrorism.wordpress.com/

The answer to the above questions, in my opinion, estimation, and investigation is confirmed, and then some. The world is scarier than we realize. To investigate any of this information, without being familiar with the informant system or government agencies is almost impossible. For a normal, fairly sane person to try to investigate the information can be cumbersome, but in this community of Targeted Individuals, to stay alive and survive, many have had to become minor investigators in their own capacities.

Threat Assessment Teams, the topic has been covered several times, that’s what the community was up against, for case history, I give you the Jane Clift case.

Her case is exactly what most people on a minor scale are up against. In Jane’s case she was advised she was getting listed as medium risk, only to be seen in pairs, and that a warning would come up every time she was in any situation.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/?s=jane+clift+

The case is what we end up seeing in the Gang Stalking community, on a minor level.

Eg. Threat Assessment Team, evaluated her as a danger to the community, in her case it was the local council, in other cases HR get’s the person listed, however it happens. Once the person is listed, they are monitored by the local monitoring units, or individuals in the community, in her case she was monitored for trying to be a good citizen. Others have complained about monitoring for arguments with those in the community, or workplace, who have the know how to get individuals listed.

Once the local monitoring unit is called in, you have positions in some countries, such as community advisors, unit commanders, shift commanders, who are responsible for the monitoring, of the individuals. The unit and shift commanders or in some cases “case workers” as one liked to fancy himself as, are responsible. In too many cases some are criminals themselves, and organize a deliberate campaign of harassment, against the individuals.

Thus people on the street are literally being given directions, the ones that are on the informant system, or in some simple cases co-workers are being given a warning about the person. Mostly however it’s the informant class, and the government agent class that create the problems for innocent individuals.

Deliberately trying to destroy their lives, and removing them all too often from their existences.

NOw try coming into any of the above positions without being on the informant system, or agency and those in charge have no idea what to do with you. It would be almost impossible to get into a community advisor role, unit commander role, or shift commander role without being in one of these situation, but if you could get into one of these roles, slip in unnoticed, or accidentally come into the role, then those who interface with these units, have no idea how to interact with the individual, because the systems are now creepishly designed to work with the informant system. Period.

Government Agents

Energy

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/energy/

Whenever I read the case of John St Clair Akwei, and what governments are capable of doing, or allegedly capable of doing as per the lawsuit that the signal intelligence agent filed against the government, pertaining to aspects of his work, it always sounds so futuristic, so Matrix like in some ways, but it’s a lawsuit that’s been there for over 15 years now?

The stuff that could be done back then, would scare most people now, but image what they are capable of now, if brain mapping, remote neural monitoring and other situations were common place when he worked for NASA.

http://www.whale.to/b/akwei.pdf

John St Clair Akwei VS Nasa

john-st-clair-akwei-vs-nasa/

[quote]
Detecting EMF fields in humans for surveillance A subject’s bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment, NSA cryptologists can
remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can be decoded into a person’s brain-states and thoughts. The subject is then perfectly monitored from a distance.

NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the Signals Intelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA’s computers will then pinpoint and track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out and track anyone in the U.S.

NSA’s Signals Intelligence use of EMF brain stimulation NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF brain stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MK Ultra program of the early 1950′s, which included neurological research into “radiation” (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development.
[/quote]

Tracking a person via their emf fields. Brain mapping technology that allows you to map a persons mind, but at a distance. [quote]

The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated brain mapping can monitor all the electrical activity in the brain continuously. The NSA records aid decodes individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for
national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for Brain-to-computer link (in military fighter aircraft, for example).

For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain’s auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use
this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations, characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject’s brain and show images from the subject’s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject’s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can
send images direct to the visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves.

NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.
[/quote]

Remember it’s been claimed that this stuff has been available for decades. The lawsuit that brought this technology to light was almost 20 years ago, and this is a person who worked for the agency, and I think with this technology.

If this is being used remotely and at a distance on people, how many people in society might not even be aware that such programing has been used on them until it’s too late?[quote]

Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the U.S. since the 1940′s.

The NSA, Ft. Meade, has in place a vast two-way wireless RNM system which is used to track subjects and non-invasively monitor audio-visual information in their brain. This is all done with no physical contact with the subject. RNM is the ultimate method of surveillance and domestic intelligence. Speech, 3D sound, and subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject’s brain (bypassing the ears), and images can be sent into the visual cortex. RNM can alter a subject’s perceptions, moods, and motor control. [/quote]

Frequency

The informants are contacted on the street with a special frequency, and they do get instructions, if you could hear the stuff they are advised, literally walk really close to this person, we just want to see if he reacts, we just want to see if she has a reaction to it, mostly the average person would just do what they are told, because most do not see the bigger picture. They are innocent in a way, but some are pretty specific, eg. Driving close enough to cause an accident, deliberately, some are all too knowing, and cognizant, meaning fully aware. It’s a scary balance, and I can now personally attest to the fact that they do have in most cases, directions that are being conveyed to them. A frequency is being utilized, and that’s pretty scary.

Could a variety of individuals be on the informant system? I mean to be an informant don’t most people have to be criminals? It’s pretty scary, because in most people’s mind’s informants are criminals, at least in my mind they were, but in today’s society, they get all sorts onto the informant system. I do feel that some groups are targeted more than others, just based on attitudes and mentalities of those that are deliberately assigned with ensuring school children get placed on the informant system. High School and the informant system, jr high and the informant system. Yes that’s the fate of some of our school children, isn’t that nice.

You would think that people have to commit some major crime, but even with just the items I’ve researched online, eg. Rachel Hoffman.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/rachel-hoffman-deadly-dealings/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/throwdown/

Or even the girl who got stopped for parking tickets, had no drug use or drug selling history, from a small town, and was placed on the informant system as a confidential informant. In that specific case, her dad went back with her to the station, and removed her from the informant system, in that case she had a lawyer in the family. The point is innocent people who have no idea how this working, are being destroyed, converted, etc. So when a document appears online explaining that many in major cities are already on the informant system, don’t be surprised, because the above example, was from a small town, and if the small towns are this far gone, then that becomes problematic.

http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking09/Attica_Informants.html

http://www.snitching.org/2009/11/recruiting_new_informants.html

{November 10, 2009
Posted by Alexandra Natapoff at 06:27 AM
Recruiting new informants

Here’s a revealing article in the Buffalo News: Walking thin line in Village of Attica: Would-be informant says police coerced her into cooperation. It’s about Bianca Hervey, a 20-year-old college student who got pulled over by police for failing to pay her traffic tickets. The police threatened to put her in jail for the night, unless she agreed to become a drug informant. Although Hervey did not use drugs or have any connections to the drug world, police told her it didn’t matter–she could still work as a snitch and try to set people up. Frightened of going to jail, Hervey signed the informant agreement. When she told her father, attorney Richard Furlong, what had happened, however, he “went ballistic.”

Furlong went to the police and to the City of Attica and complained about the recruitment of young people into the world of drugs, but the police and the Village Board refused to change the policy.

This story illustrates how snitching has quietly become such an immense part of the criminal justice system. Many cities have policies like Attica’s, in which police can recruit any potential offender as a drug informant–even a 20-year-old guilty of nothing more than a traffic violation. It was this same
type of policy that led to the death of 23-year-old Rachel Hoffman in Tallahassee, Florida, and triggered Florida’s ground breaking legislation on the subject of informant-creation. See post: Florida’s “Rachel’s Law” offers some protections for informants.}

Alexandra Natapoff, has done some wonderful research into the informant system, she is a lawyer, and the above summary is from her. Her statistics more importantly, back up much of what has been said about the numbers, and figures of those on the informant system in most major cities, and some communities.

In summary, it’s not paranoia when they are out to get you, as the saying goes, and it’s not paranoia to believe that too many people are on informant systems, and in or a part of government agencies. The things Targeted individuals blog about, satellite tracking, etc, that’s common knowledge, because their are articles which cover, how local police and others have access to these minor technologies, and have had access for years. The items less well known, but that have also been pretty common are things like the John St clair Akwei case, and the technologies used there. The figures on the informant system are understated, to say that have or above that in cities are on the informant system, is understated.
To say that school children are being stopped, interrogated for minor things, and then placed on the informant system, similar to how Bianca Harvey was, is not an exaggeration. “Weed” children is not a good look, and it’s also, one of the ways these kids in today’s society are getting themselves into these situations, but also at times they are foolishly, and unwisely being set up by their little friends, who are already on the informant systems.

October 22, 2012 Posted by | Awareness, CIA, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Community harassment, Conformity, conspiracies, Cults, Echelon, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking | , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Snitch culture

 I found this book about a year ago, when I just started trying to figure out what gang stalking was. I had researched snitching, cause I figured they had something to do with what was happening, it would be a long time before I realised they had everything to do with what is happenig, and that gang stalkers and snitches were essentially the same thing.

It would be some time before I figured out about the controlled society as well, and how far back this culture of snitching goes.

I got the site back up, and I am blogging as quickly as I can, cause who knows how long my computer will behave.

I had to fix the site, someone had defaced it, while I was offline. They had removed the profiles, with stories of individuals, the page that I have about snitches, interestingly enough, and a couple of others, like how to cope. Very specific and very telling.

Anyways, I have not had a chance to read the book, but I think the article, explains what I have been trying to explain over the last year about the snitches. The information, (the truth) is out there, it’s just a matter of finding it. Ofcourse I stubbled across this a year ago, and had no idea that it was relavant to what I was researching, or what was happening to me. Now looking back, I don’t see how I could have missed it, but I did.

You can be living in one reality and even when it get’s strange, still miss a lot of the significance of it all, which I am sure I still am, but I can only handle so much at once. Everything in good time.

Anyhow enjoy the article, and if you get the chance to, pick up the book, or the other book the article recommends by Frank Donner. He is the one who also wrote Red Squads.

http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/article/id730/pg1/index.html
   

December 4, 2007 Posted by | 9/11, black, Censorship, Cointelpro, community policing, Controlled society, Covert investigations, domestic spying, Echelon, Fascism, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, Gaslighting, government corruption, harassment, Laws, Mccarthyism, Minorities, Monitoring, New World Order, NWO, PROMIS, Red Squads, Skin Heads, Snitches, society, Spying, Stop snitching, zero tollerance | 2 Comments

So you want a revolution?

This is something that has been playing in my head. I don’t know why.

Youtube

It’s such a happy song, and the Beatles look like they are having just so much fun singing this. I keep thinking what could have been so bad about John Lennon, that the State had to follow him around, and then his eventual assassination, but of course I know the answer, he had a following of millions of people and he was teaching those anti-establishment ideas that the state just hates so much.

Men like him, Martin Luther, Jesus just don’t seem harmful, but that’s to innocent naive minds like mine. Not to a brutal state, they are horrible evil threats, that needed to be removed.

[quote]You say you want a revolution
Well you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it’s evolution
Well you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don’t you know you can count me out

Don’t you know it’s gonna be alright
Alright, alright

You say you got a real solution
Well you know
We don’t love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well you know
We’re doing what we can
But if you want money for people with minds that hate
All I can tell you is brother you have to wait

Don’t you know it’s gonna be alright
Alright, alright, al…

You say you’ll change the constitution
Well you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it’s the institution
Well you know
You better free your mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
You ain’t going to make it with anyone anyhow

Don’t you know know it’s gonna be alright
Alright, alright

Alright, alright
Alright, alright
Alright, alright
Alright, alright [/quote]

So I was thinking about this, and what it would really mean in today’s modern society to plan a revolution. Keeping in mind that a year ago, I could not have conceived that there could be anything in my society to revolt against, or want to revolt against, maybe lower taxes, but nothing like this.
Again how you would revolt and what exactly you would revolt against is not clear. I mean the dictates of the state are being upheld by regular people, so if you really don’t want to go along with this, then just don’t.

Ask for people you can vote for who will change this, but if you want to do this revolution thing the old fashion way here are some thoughts.

If you are going to do a physical rebellion, first of all, who or what exactly would you physically rebel against? Again isn’t it like shooting yourselves in the foot, when you could just stop submitting to peer pressure and just say no? Maybe that’s just over simplified.

Ok some thoughts on what you are up against.

First if you are rebelling, then you clearly have to have a better system in place right, or concept or idea, and people who are honest, moral and decent who are going to make that happen right? Cause you don’t want to be out of the frying pan and into the fire, getting rid of one brutal and oppressive, dishonest state for another. Also since the world has always been like this to some degree, I am thinking some other bogus constitutional change would be the better course of action.

Second our current society have some horrible tricks up their sleeves. If anyone has missed it, our local police are becoming more and more militarized every year.

I have read of some cases where they are going over seas and being trained by the Israel military?

Infowars

Democratic Underground

[quote]While the Drug War had been the main subject regarding this effect, everything has been pushed into overdrive as a result of the War on Terror. Now, ordinary drug users are being seen as accomplices of terrorists, let alone those involved in the distribution and sale of narcotics….

Also, cyber-terror has been lumped into the mix, leading to the specter of a SEAL raid on Hong Kong or Taiwanese hackers, leaving nerds with their brains splattered all over their computer monitors from the fire of milled, not stamped, Heckler & Koch submachine guns from a distance of 3 feet, shot in the back of the head…..

See, a military target can be killed without compunction or remorse. A military target has no rights. He is the moral equivalent of Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Laden, to be given no quarter, to be taken out by any means necessary, with the survival of friendlies being given a much higher priority than the survival of innocents who may be caught in the crossfire. (After all, they are “collateral damage,” or, better, “were being used as ‘human shields’.”)

From here on, the oath to guard America from enemies both foreign, and domestic, trumps all law established to restrain police, since the police are the military, and the military is the police. Terrorists, and accomplices of terrorists, might be killed, if desirable, on the spot, without benefit of a trial, evidence, or the opportunity for a defense before a jury of one’s peers. Any number of propagandist slogans can be used to cover for such actions, such as, “He had it coming,” “His peers are scum,” and “He’s not One Of Us.”
[/quote]

Satellites

Washington Post

[quote]The Bush administration has approved a plan to expand domestic access to some of the most powerful tools of 21st-century spycraft, giving law enforcement officials and others the ability to view data obtained from satellite and aircraft sensors that can see through cloud cover and even penetrate buildings and underground bunkers. [/quote]

Just picture you in the movie Enemy of the state instead of Will Smith. (I will let you look up the movie clip for this one.) I mean not only can these suckers track you on land, but now they can view you in underground bunkers? Yet they still could never find Bin Laden. :eyeroll:

So not only can you not plan your rebellion in the open, but then when you take it underground, you are going to be spied on. Unlike the The Gunpowder Plot rebellion with Guy Fawkes, which the movie V 4 Vendetta alludes to. They just had snitches to worry about, but you would have snitches and spy satellites. Imagine V trying to plot his little rebellion under those conditions?

Snitches

Probably the most effective weapon of the state. Oppression of the people by the people. A whole society of snitches. People spying on each other and not knowing who they can trust, cause a rebellion hardly happens without plotting, and to plot you probably need people, unless you are resourceful like the movie character V.

So to begin with you have a society of people with not the best morals, and many with no sense of family or community loyalty, but a sense of loyalty to the State. Russia really knew what they were doing. So does this society now. So with most of society snitching and spying on each other, how you would even trust each other to plot together is beyond me. This would be one of the biggest obstacles to overcome, figuring out who to trust. (That’s easy, no one?)

Spy cameras

OK currently Britain is the most heavily laden society with these spy cameras. Let’s see how many spy cameras per person. Oh and don’t worry, your society is soon to follow.

[quote]Per capita there are more surveillance cameras in the UK than any other country in the world – more than a million according to one recent estimate.

The average city dweller can expect to be captured on film every five minutes. Almost 500,000 low budget CCTV kits have been bought in the last three years.

At this rate, by 2015 there will be no such thing as a secret place in our city centres, according to Simon Davies, of the pressure group Privacy International. [/quote]

For the time being they are still counting on humans to monitor the data. Have you seen the ones that talk to you yet? Those are apparently loads of fun.

Brain reading devices

Yes it’s no longer ok to think bad thoughts, think nice thoughts, think nice thoughts. Ok maybe just some naughty ones, but nothing against the state, cause they can monitor you and arrest you for it. Well they can monitor you for it, but no laws that we know of have been passed yet, for arrest, but you know if there is a movie plot about this, the rest is likely to be coming.

Guardian.co.uk

[quote]

Using the technology is ‘like shining a torch, looking for writing on a wall’. CT image: Charles O’Rear/Corbis

A team of world-leading neuroscientists has developed a powerful technique that allows them to look deep inside a person’s brain and read their intentions before they act.

The research breaks controversial new ground in scientists’ ability to probe people’s minds and eavesdrop on their thoughts, and raises serious ethical issues over how brain-reading technology may be used in the future.

The team used high-resolution brain scans to identify patterns of activity before translating them into meaningful thoughts, revealing what a person planned to do in the near future. It is the first time scientists have succeeded in reading intentions in this way.
[/quote]

Ok now I have to admit, I have not seen the movie with Tom cruise yet, but since the real live version of this is about to hit, does anyone have a copy of Minority Report they want to lend me?

I will let you look up the movie clip on this one.

Internet Movie Data Base

[quote]
Plot Outline:

What would you do if you were accused of a murder, you had not committed… yet? more

In the future, criminals are caught before the crimes they commit, but one of the officers in the special unit is accused of one such crime and sets out to prove his innocence.[/quote]

Echelon

When it’s baby brother is not interpreting your thoughts, Echelon is listing to what you are saying. Keep in mind it’s not just Echelon listening in. Anything we have, any device we have that has a microphone can be turned into a listening device. We can even be listened in on via our land line phones, when they are on the hook. Cell phones, laptops, pda devices, can be listened in on remotely. Remember the mobster who was taken down because they remotely planted software on his cell phone so they could listen to his conversations in the room, even when the cell phone is turned off? As long as it has a microphone or it’s a communication device, then watch your back.

We have this scary society that likes to listen in to what we are saying and wants to watch what we are doing.

[quote]In the greatest surveillance effort ever established, the US National Security Agency (NSA) has created a global spy system, codename ECHELON, which captures and analyzes virtually every phone call, fax, email and telex message sent anywhere in the world. ECHELON is controlled by the NSA and is operated in conjunction with the Government Communications Head Quarters (GCHQ) of England, the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) of Canada, the Australian Defense Security Directorate (DSD), and the General Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) of New Zealand. These organizations are bound together under a secret 1948 agreement, UKUSA, whose terms and text remain under wraps even today.

The ECHELON system is fairly simple in design: position intercept stations all over the world to capture all satellite, microwave, cellular and fiber-optic communications traffic, and then process this information through the massive computer capabilities of the NSA, including advanced voice recognition and optical character recognition (OCR) programs, and look for code words or phrases (known as the ECHELON “Dictionary”) that will prompt the computers to flag the message for recording and transcribing for future analysis. Intelligence analysts at each of the respective “listening stations” maintain separate keyword lists for them to analyze any conversation or document flagged by the system, which is then forwarded to the respective intelligence agency headquarters that requested the intercept. [/quote]

PROMIS

Prosecutors Management Information Systems

Something that can track you so well, it knows when you are sleeping, knows when you are awake, probably knows if you have been good or bad, so be good for goodness sake. I don’t know if it makes a list and checks it twice though, have to get back to you on that one.

From the Wilderness

[quote]

What was it designed to do?

Designed as case-management software for federal prosecutors, PROMIS has the ability to combine disparate databases, and to track people by their involvement with the legal system.
What are some PROMIS capabilities?

What would you do if you possessed software that could think, understand every language in the world, that provided peep holes into everyone else’s computer “dressing rooms,” that could insert data into computers without people’s knowledge, that could fill in blanks beyond human reasoning and also predict what people would do – before they did it?….

Commenting on the capabilities of PROMIS, Mike Ruppert
states that “Mated with artificial intelligence it is
capable of analyzing not only an individual’s, but also
a community’s entire life, in real time. It is also
capable of issuing warnings when irregularities appear
and of predicting future movements based upon past
behavior.”

[/quote]

I did a pretty In-depth look at PROMIS earlier this year, so if you want to have a gander at what it can do, check out the full blog post.

WordPress

[quote]a). The venture, from the intelligence point of view, was a major success. Suspected dissidents couldn’t move anywhere without Big Brother watching them. Even if they traveled under a false name, various characteristics, such as height, hair color, age, were fed into roadside terminals and PROMIS searched through its database looking for a common denominator. It would be able to tell an army commander that a certain dissident who was in the north three days before had caught a train, then a bus, stayed at a friend’s house, and was now on the road under a different name. That’s how frightening the system was. By late 1985 virtually all dissidents – and an unknown number of unidentified innocents – had been rounded up. In a country whose rulers had no patience for such people, 20,000 government opponents either died or disappeared.[/quote]

Needless to say if you are having a rebellion, it will know before you do where you are staying and likely who you are staying with, as it and it’s brothers track you around the globe.

Active Denial Weapons.

What can I say about these? Well they are actively being tested out on Iraqi citizen’s right now. They are painful and yet if they don’t kill you, but just fry the inside of you apparently it’s ok, and they are approved for use. Once they finish testing these babies out on the Iraqi population and you try to have your rebellion, then it will be your turn.

Global Security

[quote]Active Denial Technology is a breakthrough non-lethal technology that uses millimeter-wave electromagnetic energy to stop, deter and turn back an advancing adversary from relatively long range. It is expected to save countless lives by providing a way to stop individuals without causing injury, before a deadly confrontation develops.[/quote]

Mindfully

[quote]The ultimate weapon

Electromagnetic weapons operate at the speed of light; they can kill, torture and enslave; but the public are largely unaware that they exist, because these weapons operate by stealth and leave no physical evidence. Electromagnetic weapons have been tested on human beings since 1976. By widely dispersing the involuntary human test-subjects, and vehemently attacking their credibility, it has been possible for the United States to proceed with these human experiments unhindered by discussions or criticisms, let alone opposition.

This ultimate weapon system is currently being deployed in Iraq. The US Air Force and the Marine Corps refer to it as “active denial technology”, as if it were used purely for defense, but it is not [/quote]

Yeah feel the burn. People are feeling the burn and we should be doing what we can to ensure their rights the same way we would our own, because what will be used against them, will be used against us later on. Sooner than later.

Your selves.

And let’s say you defeat all those demons at the end of the day, you still have the biggest obstacle to overcome, that’s right yourselves. The people who subscribed to this madness in the first place, the people who let this system continue for so long, you can over come a system, but if you don’t first free your minds, change your mentality and attitudes you will be right back where you came from.

It’s like the Israelites being freed from the Egyptians, and coming through the red sea, 40 years in the dessert, and these wars and battles to cleanse the land, and the moment they had the chance to what did the people do? Why they choose a King from amongst themselves to rule over them. So everyone can blame a state all they want, but the people have to take responsibility for the state of things as well.

Brookwitt

[quote] Samuel was not very happy about this so he took the matter to God. “And the Lord told him: “Listen to all that the people are saying to you; it is not you they have rejected, but they have rejected me as their king. As they have done from the day I brought them up out of Egypt until this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so they are doing to you. Now listen to them but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will do” (I Samuel 8:7-9).

So God said okay, if they want to make someone other than me their king fine, but warn them that it will not be good. Samuel went back to the people and told them this but they insisted on having a king. “‘No!’ they said. ‘We want a king over us. Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles” (I Sam. 8:20). God’s people did not trust that He would go before them and fight for them. They wanted a man to protect and rule over them. God warned them but ultimately let them make the decision. “Listen to them and give them a king” (I Sam. 8:22). [/quote]

The same thing happened in Lord Of The Rings. I will let you look up the movie clip.

If you wanted change, change would happen, you have the power to do this, you either don’t realise it, or are too scared, or mentally bound to make the change, or you really just don’t want change and then that’s all good too. It was just some early morning thoughts and ramblings that I thought I would share with you.

Ok I am actually going to attempt to sleep, but the Beatles song keep playing on in the background. Ok now I am on to some 80’s clip trip. Just as good.

August 18, 2007 Posted by | Active Denial Weapons, Beatles, Brain reading device, constitutional change, Controlled society, Echelon, electromagnetic frequency, Gangstalking, High technology, Jesus, John Lennon, Martin Luther King Jr, militarized police force, Movies, Police State, PROMIS, revolution, Snitches, society, Spy cameras, spy satellites, State target, Surveillence | 4 Comments