Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Dream Manipulation intro

I was looking for some information on dream manipulation recently. Some targets have been talking about this, but I have had limited chance to investigate. I do believe it is happening.

I found this quote about how it might be getting done.

http://www.ufodigest.com/news/0207/mindcontrol.html

Recently I received information in regards to the USAF possessing technology enabling them to basically hack their way into the minds of individuals and wreak all kinds of havoc. When I read about the use of elfs (extremely low frequencies) and other electromagnetic/holographic means to do this, it then dawned on me that some of the dreams I was having at the time (and are still having) were most like

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/akwei.pdf

Here is information from a lawsuit by John St. Clair Akwei.

For electronic surveillance purposes electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the
subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain’s auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication
direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.
Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual
cortex of a subject’s brain and show images from the subject’s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject’s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex. bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.

A few years ago targets were talking about Mind Reading and mind reading technology. I believed that it was happening, but waited till I could find really credible proof to write anything about it. Now targets are complaining about dream manipulation, and implated dreams. Yes I believe that this is happening, and the technology exists that can do this. If they can see your dreams, know what you are thinking, then why not implant the dreams and manipulate how the dreams go?

That is really dangerous, because let’s say you want to get someone to confess to a crime. You implant things from the murder scene that only the killer could know, then you just pretend that you extracted that information from some poor patsy you want to set up. So let’s say you can remotely read dreams, the information shows up on a screen, what the person is thinking, dreaming etc. The pre-programed information is imputed into someone’s mind ahead of time, and you just pretend that you extracted the information.

Eg. Let’s say I wanted to set someone up as the a terrorist manual, I could imput information or a dream about the manual, and the person would have dreams about how they wrote the manual, how they plan to use the manual to blow up buildings etc. (Remember this is just an example.) Then someone trying to frame that person could just pretend to have extracted the information.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/09/24/mind-reading-machine-puts-woman-in-jail-for-murder/

Mind-Reading Machine Puts Woman in Jail for Murder

Will a new brain scan test put an end to lying in court? A judge in India recently used a brain scan to convict a 24-year-old woman of murdering her fiancé.

In a new and controversial way of gathering incriminating evidence, the defendant was read details of her fiancé’s death while electrodes were hooked up to her head to measure her brain waves. Afterwards, the authorities used processing software to analyze the brain scans, revealing that the woman’s brain lit up when she heard information that only the killer would know.

Now consider this, in future at airports we are going to be using similar profiling methods, so let’s say you want to set someone up to be a terrorist. You just implant memories of specific installations, maybe some box cutters or what have you, and that person could be framed for a crime they did not commit, but the memories would all be there. See very convincing, it’s like Minority report for the masses.

http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2010/01/mind-reading_systems_profili ng.html

A system has been devised and developed by Israeli-based WeCU Technologies. They are testing it out at Israeli airports, and what it does is that it projects images onto airport screens, eg. symbols associated with a certain terrorist group, or other images only a potential terrorist would recognize.

Now if they can and are manipulating what people dream about, how does that play out in the real world in regards to the choices they make? What about the Mancurian Candidate, or the person who kills their spouse after having a series of disturbing dreams?

As I started this is a new topic, I have not had a chance to truly investigate it, and find the credible sources that I seek, but I know enough to believe strongly that the technology not only exists, but that it’s being used.

The information regarding Threat Assessment Teams takes up a lot of my time, so it might be a while before I get back to this topic, but I wanted to confirm that I am aware, this is an issue, and yes I do believe this is being done.

What I think is that once on these lists, those who like to experiment on people deemed mentally ill, see it as open season and go about doing what they feel like. Our hypocritical media, and fellow citizens rattle on about freedom this, rights taken away that, but really and truly, most of the blame for things like this lie within the society that let it happen. You can blame the powers that be only so much, till you realize that the people have the power, and it’s often them that let things continue till it get’s so bad there is not a choice, but to speak out. Things are not that bad yet, so the state has the silent complacence of our fellow citizens.

(I recieved a question about the mind reading claim. Someone said that mind reading was impossible, and thus it was ruining the credibility of the community to make the claim. This was my response.)

Mind Reading

Some targets have expressed concerns that mind reading technology, or individuals with psi abilities are being used to interpret their thoughts. Proving that such technology was even available has almost been impossible until now.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/01/mind-reading/

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/01/airports-could-get-mind-reading-scanners/

Laws that prohibit this type of intrusive activity have not caught up with the surveillance society that many live in. I think this will be something law makers might wish to be aware of, and start working on laws prohibiting this type of intrusion. Human rights lawyers might also want to hone up on these technologies.

The woman in India was convicted because they were able to extract information from her mind at close range. All I am saying, and what the research shows is not only do they have technology which can do this, and is doing this, but they also have mind readers who do the same.

For the mind readers I have referenced the U.S.own program on remote viewing, and even police forces use psychics which is not the same as being a mind reader, but it shows there are people with special talents and abilities being hired by agencies.

If you want any additional links let me know.

Welcome To The Coming Surveillance Society

http://gang-stalking.blogspot.com/2010/08/welcome-to-coming-surveillance-society.html

4. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/08/tech/main6374956.shtml

http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2010/08/intel_to_develop_mind_reading_computer_technology.html
Full Body Scanners

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4697682n

http://current.com/technology/91865313_tsa-funding-airport-mind-reading-scanners.htm

http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/mind-reading-scientists-say-future-crime-can-be-predicted-with-100-per-cent-accuracy/story-fn5fsgyc-1225900951919

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-20002107-76.html

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/akwei.pdf -A lawsuit from a former NASA employee about mind reading.

Hopefully the articles and videos will help open up your mind. There should be a video in there somewhere called the real X-files about the remote viewing programs that were run. If you still think that the credibility of the community is being destroyed, come back and look me up.

I can tell you that after sharing the information people were skeptical, but once I provided the links, links from mainstream sources, they all shut up. Most people will listen, or at least open their minds when good information is provided.

So what I said stands, mind reading is being used. Period. 5 years ago, I just rolled my eyes in disbelief, and ignored the people talking about, today I know it’s used.

The real X-files. The U.S. military admits to remote viewing programs, but listen to what these people did under this program. So don’t tell me that mind reading could not exist. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7371160296945984442

November 6, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Virgin Birth

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/10/081010-shark-virgin-birth-2.html

Ok. I know that you are all as fascinated by this subject matter as I am, not. Still it’s a really interesting subject. The correct term for it is parthenogenesis. This means a female egg will self fertilize without the presence of a male and she will give birth.

This has been know to happening with insects, amphibians and reptiles. Usually this happens after long periods without the presence of any males. Recently just to show you how far behind our science is, they realised that sharks have this ability, maybe not all sharks, but at least two species, including the hammerhead shark.

A female shark that had been in an aquarium died, and upon autopsy it showed that she was carrying a fully formed pup. Neat.

Could this happen in other species? Probably, but since science has not been looking for virgin births, when they see it, they probably attribute it to other things, such as long term sperm storage, yeah. If you are not looking for proof of a phenomenon, how can you prove it’s existence?

So if this happens with sharks, reptiles, and other amphibians could it ever happen with mammals? With this is an interesting question, and I don’t know if they are looking into this, because their science tells them that it’s not likely, that is of course until it happens. If you are not looking for a phenomenon, then you won’t recognise it even if it does happen.

The problem with mammals is of course by their very nature, they often take care of their young, and many live in communal groups, whales, bats, humans, etc, so the circumstances that would bring about  parthenogenesis in other species probably does not present itself as readily in mammals.

I think it’s interesting and something that science should try to look into. Since we know that when this happens the offspring has fused chromosomes of the mother, then we could genetically test mammals to see if this phenomenon had happened in any species that exist alone for long periods of time. Here is the story about the shark and it gives you a lot to think about.

[quote]Chapman and his colleagues generated a DNA fingerprint for the mother shark and her pup fetus with a procedure identical to a human paternity test.

Ordinarily, a shark’s DNA contains some genetic material from its mother and some from its father. Tidbit’s pup, however, was not ordinary.

“Every part of the fingerprint of the embryo comes from the mother,” Chapman said. “In other words, there is no genetic material from a father.”
[/quote]

Since we now know that this does happen in nature, what we don’t know are what are the mechanism that trigger this effect? Is it a rear occurrence or something programed in all genetics to keep the species going? There are a lot of unanswered questions, because if you know what triggers the process, then you can say if it could happen in other species.

[quote]Examples have been documented in komodo dragons, pythons, rattlesnakes, chickens, and turkeys. [/quote]

This article is saying that parthenogenesis would not be possible with humans, but I don’t believe that for a second. Until we understand more about the process, what triggers it, and how do we know what the cells would be capable of? All humans start off as female embryos, and then with the male hormone they become male vs female. How do we know what processes would kick in under these circumstances in nature? Currently however science has not reported parthenogenesis in any mammals, but till a couple of years ago, they had not reported anything in sharks either, and thought that it was impossible, till it happened.

[quote]Parthenogenesis is not possible in humans because if all the genetic material comes from the mother, certain genes will be switched off, and the embryo won’t develop.

“For sharks in captivity, [parthenogenesis
[/quote]

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4909

[quote]A mammal that is the daughter of two female parents has been created for the first time.

Until now such a feat had been considered biologically impossible. But the mouse, called Kaguya, was born without the involvement of any sperm or male cell – only female eggs were needed.

In the same way that the birth of Dolly the sheep in 1997 shattered the dogma that an adult cell could never be reprogrammed to make a new individual, the fact that Kaguya lives challenges another one of long-held rule: that two mammals of the same sex cannot combine their genomes to give rise to viable offspring.
[/quote]

If we can do this in the lab, why could this not naturally occur in nature, when we see that there is a natural process in nature that does make this possible for other species? Could it be that we are not looking?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-mouse-that-roared-virgin-birth-560837.html

[quote]The mouse was generated from two unfertilised eggs and its birth has demonstrated for the first time that it is possible for mammals to be born by the “virgin birth” phenomenon of parthenogenesis.

Scientists said the mouse developed normally to adulthood and had offspring of its own by normal sexual reproduction, showing parthenogenesis could work on warm-blooded mammals, including humans.
[/quote]

What we need to do to set science on it’s ears once more is to find the process working in nature, which I do believe is fully possible. Again however, we need to know more about what starts the process, so that we can look for optimum circumstances where that can be achieved? Is it just removing males from the environment for long periods of time? Does the female need to be isolated also? Are all creature capable of this, or just some special ones within the species? What tells the process internally to start?

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/belfast-team-discover–virgin-birth-13444103.html

[quote]Dr Paulo Prodohl, head of the Queen’s research team, said: “The findings were really surprising because as far as anyone knew, all sharks reproduced only sexually by a male and female mating, requiring the embryo to get DNA from both parents for full development, just like in mammals.

“The discovery that sharks can reproduce asexually by parthenogenesis now changes this paradigm, leaving mammals as the only major vertebrate where this form of reproduction has not been seen.”

Parthenogenesis – where females give birth to fully formed young without their eggs being fertilised by a male – has very occasionally been seen in some vertebrate groups such as birds, reptiles and amphibians, but has never before been seen in major vertebrate lines such as mammals or sharks.

The most likely form of parthenogenesis leads to less genetic diversity in the infant than the mother, leading to fears that genetic diversity could be eroding in shark populations if females have difficulty finding mates.

[/quote]
Till science can answer these questions conclusively, I don’t think it’s fair for them to presume what is and what is not possible at this stage, because we don’t know enough about what starts the process, we just know that it is capable of happening.

December 12, 2008 Posted by | Science | , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments