Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Emma Sayle, Killing Kittens

I was doing some research, and just trying to figure out the outcome of the investigation into a figure called Emma Sayles, she was allegedly being investigated for sex parties that she was having, she use to run a website called killing kittens, and they were double checking that her house, her home was not being used for commercial purposes. That the sex parties, at what she described as a private members club, was just that, and not something slightly different, I am just wondering what the outcome of that was.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1343017/Kate-Middletons-friend-cautioned-police-joke-shooting-illegal-immigrants.html#ixzz2aSJ3Wrg1

Miss Sayle, who attended Downe House boarding school with Prince Michael of Kent’s daughter Gabriella Windsor, was the subject of a London council investigation earlier this year over claims her Killing Kittens firm used a £30million house for sex parties

The concern is ofcourse, a private members club, where woman can be as sexually explicit as they want, is one thing, even if alleged orgies were happening, that’s her business, but the implication in the articles, is that the situation was being used for commercial purposes, and that it may have been something slightly different. Even that some camera phone images might have gotten out, and that she is or was at one point being investigated.

Emma Sayle is also credited with starting a group called the sisterhood, she seems to be an interesting character. Some sort of charitable organization was mentioned as well in the article.

Sex parties, orgies, and other situations that are a little bit more mature  are not my cup of tea, but they might be someone else’s, my other concern or question is, are the individuals that use to attend these parties, being investigated as well, either. I mean if the sex parties, orgies, or killing kittens situation, turned out to be more commercial, then private, and I am sure the investigation clarified this, were the others implicated, in the happenings, either the men or the women? Was there any threat of them being investigated also, or even charged, for participation into these sorts of situations?

Somedays, I am glad, that I lead such a boring staid little life. 🙂

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/7601823/Kate-Middletons-chum-Emma-Sayle-and-the-sex-party-house.html

OK, lets first talk about Emma Sayle. First and for most, She owns and run a sex club in London called “”Killing Kittens” and the Sisterhood rowing charity and this woman is a media whore! And not very pleasant person to be frank.

http://princessdianafriend.tumblr.com/post/27118547042/the-emma-sayle-and-kate-middleton-connection-the-sex

http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2009/07/27/emma_sayle_killing_kittens_sex_party_feature.shtml

“These parties turn into mass orgies – they’re big sex parties – and it’s a case of 50 per cent of the people that come along do take clothes off, and the other 50 per cent just come along for a good party and keep their clothes on.”

http://royalinsight.net/forum/index.php?topic=40039.5;wap2

Emma Sayle is in NO way a “madam.” A madam runs a brothel, which by definition is a place where men pay to have quickie sex with a prostitute. Killing Kittens is a members club which organizes sex parties for people who are interested in that kind of thing.

Link to Killing Kittens. (I don’t recommend anyone under the age of 18 clicking the link): http://www.killingkittens.com/homepage.htm

(If the website is still active, I am over 18, but not sure I will brave clicking on the link, bit of a prude at times. 🙂

July 29, 2013 Posted by | Awareness, Conspiracy | , , , , | Leave a comment

Follow the money trail

I was just watching this television show & it reminded me of this series or something called “The Dark Monarchy”, or something, I think the show that I was actually watching was called “Castles”, and the show was enabling others to comprehend just how creating some of these peer of the realm families have had to be in refinancing their assets, eg. in creating the situation, in fulfilling the request.

http://www.pbs.org/program/secrets-manor-house/

The show that was called “Castles” very interesting series, but the main item I took away from the show is that many families are finding creative ways to finance large estates, because the inheritances do not always cover what they should, I know that for some it’s hard to believe, but for others that is the case.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Victoria

Her coronation took place on 28 June 1838, and she became the first sovereign to take up residence at Buckingham Palace.[38] She inherited the revenues of the duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, and was granted a civil list of £385,000 per year. Financially prudent, she paid off her father’s debts.

 Imagine if  “Victoria” in all her great, guts and glory had debts at time, then you can imagine that others might also, and that being in the spotlight, might not always be what it’s cut out to be. I recall reading that after she married Albert they quietly refinanced the place to pay it off, and refurbished quite a bit of it. 

If Victoria in her reign can be in such situations at times then, you have to imagine that others might as well. These politicians, celebrities, royals, musicians, sports players, what have you might also not be in the correct situation at times financially.

That’s the reason why following the money trail might not be the incorrect thing, remember even Donald Trump has been or has had to declare bankruptcy in the past at least once or twice. 

https://www.legalzoom.com/legal-headlines/celebrity-lawsuits/how-does-trump-repeatedly-file

http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2011/04/29/fourth-times-a-charm-how-donald-trump-made-bankruptcy-work-for-him/

Apr 29, 2011 – First things first: Donald Trump has filed for corporate bankruptcy four times, in 1991, 1992, 2004 and 2009.

Financial

If “The Donald” can be in such situations at times, then imagine others can also, meaning too, despite what their corporate networth is or their assets. So to be in the correct situation, then it can be imagined that those in high positions might also have additional situations thus occurring or happening to them. The difference with “Donald Trump”, and others is that Mr Trump has connections, and when stuff happens, at times he can draw upon those connection, others can not, not to say that he is not a very self reliant person on his own. 

Situations

Online you always hear about those in high positions being parts of these scandals, I hate to say it, drug scandals, prostitution scandals, child pornography, and child molestation scandals, and what if the actual situation is that those in high positions like senators, and others have actual scandals of their own happening, is it actually possible. 

So how do you ever catch individuals in these scNDals? I think it’s better to follow the money trail, and since the internet exists, we can do so. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman

 American media dubbed the “Kill switch bill”, would grant the President emergency powers over the Internet. 

I think sometimes if there is one situation occuring, there could be others, and often times as it so happens, even if these individuals in these situations, seem to be financially well situation, the chances are good, they may well not be, so the best way to get access to them is to follow the money trail, don’t assume they are wealthy on the surface and behind the scenes, if you can not get at them, or go after them in any other way, follow the money trail. 

You won’t catch these people for the Franklin or Savile style cover up’s, but you  might just catch them for their financial dealings, so instead of stressing yourself out, wasting years of your time and energy, go for the money trail instead. 

April 10, 2013 Posted by | Awareness, Conspiracy, Corruption | , , , , , | 1 Comment