Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Threat Assessments 101

Threat Assessment 101

It recently came to my attention that someone wrote a post titled “It’s not community notifications, either,” and this person thought that that they had discredited the theory of the Threat Assessment Teams and how they work.

I had not previously realized the limited understanding some targets have of these teams and how they are used and how they function. I thought I would address the issue in a post titled Threat Assessment 101, and try to help the community understand how this process works a bit better. Try to apply the stages below to your own targeting, if you have any questions, please feel free to drop a line, and I will do my best to answer the question.

I do not claim to be an expert, but I do like to believe my years of research have been a bit more detailed and indeepth, compared to what some others have done.

Now the person wrote a post where he believes that he has discredited Jane Clift as a Targeted Individual because her stalking ended after she moved, and she was advised that she was to be added to the notification, but what this poster did in reality is akeen to saying, well person X does not have electronic harasssment therefore they are not a Targeted Individual, or or person B is not getting Voice To Skull so they must not be a Targeted Individual.

It shows that this person does not have an understanding of how the process works. If this person is having a hard time with the concept then other targets are also likely having the same difficuluties and I hope that this will clearify some of that.

I am going to start with how the team works.

The threat assessment team works in a four part process.

1. Identify persons of concern
2. Gather information/investigate
3. Assess information and situation
4. Manage the situation

In the case of Mrs. Clift it was her local council that was responsible for the task of evaluating individuals and placing them on the list. In other cases this will be done via a Threat Assessment Team or similar out let.

In the Jane Clift case she was identified as a person of interest because of a letter that she wrote.

Each team does things differently. But they go about gathering information as part of the next stage.

Triage questions can include:

• Has there been indications of suicidal thoughts,
plans, or attempts?
• Has there been indications of thoughts/plans of
violence?
• Does the person have access to a weapon or are
they trying to gain access?
• Are there concerns about the well-being of the
subject?

• Are there concerns about the safety of the
community?
• If yes, a full inquiry is recommended.

Gather Information (Full Inquiry)
• Think broadly and creatively about those who
might have information:

• Co-workers
• Other staff
• Friends
• Family
• Online friends, web sites, etc.
• Previous schools / employers
• Others?
• Document information and use it to answer the
Key Investigative Questions.

Threat Assessment Teams when gathering information speak to those around you, as listed above. They speak to your friends, family, co-workers, online friends, websites, etc. Places that you frequent. This is why those around the target become involved in what is ongoing.

In the Jane Clift case they would have reviewed her history and decided that she was likely someone they felt comfortable with issuing a letter letting her know that she was going to be on a list. Most people are never issued letters, again everyones targeting will be different, and have various levels. Some targets never get electronic harassment or voice to skull.

In the Jane Clift case it was decided that no further active monitoring was needed once she left the area. In other cases these teams or individuals will often decide that further monitoring is needed to ensure the safety of the community, and once the person leave the area the monitoring will continue.

In the Jane Clift case they felt that her anger had primarily been directed at individuals in her local council, so once she left, they felt safe enough to not have her further listed. If they did not feel safe she would have been followed in other areas, like many other targets are.

<blockquote>2. Have there been any communications
suggesting ideas or intent to attack?
• What, if anything, has the person
communicated to someone else (targets,
friends, co-workers, others) or written in a
diary, journal, email, or Web site concerning
his or her grievances, ideas and/or intentions?
• Has anyone been alerted or “warned away”?
Source: U.S. Secret Service and U.S. Department of Education, (2002)
Guide to Managing Threatening Situations and Creating Safe School Climates.
Key Investigative Questions</blockquote>

I can not strees this part of the targeting enough. They do communicate with everyone around the target. So when targets say that everyone is in on it. They are fully correct. They are not allowed to say anything to the person being investigated. Also it’s scary because they become aware of how serious the situation is. The target depending on which level of monitoring they are on, will have their information distributed to the community. Anyone who is a part of these community, workplace, notification, initiatives, will then get a warning about the person.

Information Sharing: FERPA

• FERPA is not an impediment to effective threat
assessment and case management.
• FERPA governs records only, not observations,
communications, etc.
• FERPA does not govern police records.
• If created & maintained by law enforcement, for
law enforcement purpose.
• New guidance from ED encourages information
sharing where public safety is a concern.
• FERPA does not permit a private right of action.

Information Sharing: HIPAA
• Check with legal counsel as to which laws
govern counseling center records.
• Confidentiality is held by client, not MH provider.
• In cases where privacy laws apply, can try these
strategies:
• No legal prohibition against providing
information to health/MH professionals.
• Inquire about Tarasoff – type duty.
• Ask subject for permission to disclose.

Record Keeping
• Centralized incident tracking database;
• Document reports and actions – include date,
time, subjects, targets, behaviors of concern,
witnesses;
• Data;
• Assessment;
• Plan;
• Preserve evidence: Keep copies of email,
memos, etc.
Record Keeping
Incident tracking database;
• Incident Information:
• Date, location, nature of incident, means of approach;
• Subject information:
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.
• Target / Victim Information;
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.
• Witness/Reporting Party Information:
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.

In a nutshell they bypass privacy laws that would normally be in place, which allows them to have those around you spy on you and give their observations and communications. Very cleaver.

This also means that strangers, and those with grudges, those who want to keep the investigation opened, such as those in the community getting paid, can have anyone submit false information. Let’s say you were originally given 18 months or 5 years on one of these lists, if there are no incedents, or something significant happens in your life, they might close the case file. If on the other hand something extreme happens, such as these people provoke you into punching them out, or falsely report that you did, then that is more time added more monitoring.

Think creatively about resources, as well as
“eyes and ears.”
• Anticipate likely change in the short and midterm,
and how the subject may react.
• Monitor using available resources. Who sees
the person regularly, inside work/campus,
outside, on weekends, online, etc.?

People need to understand that this becomes like a full Stasi investigation. For those around the target many with nothing better to do, this can become addictive and fun, some people love to play spy, and if there is a target in their area a lot of them will sit and wait for reports to come in, and if the target is in the area, they run to the bus stop, cause they want to see an incident go down. A lot of people just have no lives. Others are just genuenly scared and when the community notifications go out, danger to self or others medium risk, only to be seen in pairs, or whatever is being reported, others are just looking to protect themselves or their communities.

While the case is open the team should:

• Continue to monitor and modify the plan as long as the individual still poses a threat

• Recognize that a person can continue to pose a threat even after he/she ceases to be a Closing a Case
member of the campus community

• Continue to monitor the situation through its relationship with local law enforcement agencies and mental health agencies, as well as in direct cooperation with the person, if possible

As the threat assessment team work your file, and reports come in, reports can either bring down your threat level, or increase your threat level, they continue to monitor you, as long as they feel you are a threat, or that there is something in your life that makes you less of a threat enough for them to close your file, and your file even when closed, can be reopened, or the previous records accessed. Everything is going and starting to be feed into central databases, similar to fusion centers.

If someone who has been reviewed by the Threat Assessment Team leaves the area, do you continue to monitor him/her?

If the situation warrants reviewing the case after the subject leaves the area, the team will continue to do so. It is important to remember that when the subject has relationships in his/her life, there is a lesser chance for violence to occur. A failure to communicate or interact with a subject encourages problems to fester, which could lead to violence.

Again in the Jane Clift case, she left and her monitoring stopped because the coucil only felt that she was a threat to that one area, but in most other cases, they will warn everyone and every area that you come in contact with, because it is felt that you could be a danger to any area.

Assessment: Case Priority Levels

PRIORITY 1 (Extreme Risk): Poses clear/immediate threat of violence or self-harm and requires immediate containment, law enforcement involvement, target protection, and case management plan.

PRIORITY 2 (High Risk): Poses threat of violence or self-harm but lacks immediacy or access to target. Requires active monitoring and case management plan.

PRIORITY 3 (Moderate Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self harm, but exhibits significantly disruptive behaviors and/or need for assistance. Requires active monitoring, case management plan, and appropriate referrals.

PRIORITY 4 (Low Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self-harm at this time, but may exhibit some disruptive behavior and/or need for assistance. Requires passive monitoring. Utilize case management and referrals as appropriate.

PRIORITY 5 (No Identified Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self-harm nor is there evidence of disruption to community. No case management or monitoring required.

The above chart is the most important thing that targets need to understand about their targeting. Most of us are on what is called active monitoring, but we can slip down to passive monitoring, or up to higher levels. I believe most targets who notice the surveillance fall into the Priority 3, 4, or 5.

This means active monitoring and they feel that you could be a threat. The active monitoring is where we are likely to notice the Gang Stalking and Gang Stalking activities as the community has termed it.

Now on their blog the person wrote, that no one broke into Jane Clifts house, nobody vandalized her belongings, and nobody assaulted her. That may or may not be accurate. There is a lot that was not said about the case, what is known is that Jane even though she was aware of the listing, the social ostercism, being followed to places she was not followed before, and other factors became so bad that she had to move. Remember she did not want to move, she had to move, she infact hopes to move back there someday. It was her home, she loved it, and hoped to be a foster parent, but being on the list absolutely disrupted her life and seriously enough that she moved.

The reality is the poster in the post that I read assumes a lot about the Jane Clift case, we don’t know the full extent to what Jane experienced. Eg. There are aspects of my own targeting that will not be publically mentioned, but it does not mean that they did not occur. What the poster of the article entiled “It’s not community notifications, either” fails deeply to understand about the targeting is that every target get’s different levels of harassment. Some will be followed, but never notice the Gang Stalking till several years into the targeting. How many times online have you seen a target write that when they checked their diaries or journals they realised that the targeting had actually gone back several years, but they had never put the pieces together? Eg. The targeting at the time was there, but not bad enough for them to notice, meaning that they were likely under passive forms of monitoring, which then slipped into active forms of monitoring.

That is likely when you noticed the mood in the community change, when you noticed the home break in’s, the harassment, and on higher priority of monitoring and targeting, that is also likely where you noticed the electronic harassment, vs just Gang Stalking. It’s all part of how these teams function. The young man in his post felt that he had discredited the notion, but the post just showed how limited his understanding was of these teams work and function in relationship to our targeting.

Once you have the most basic understanding of how these threat assessment teams work, and function, you can likely see how this is working in your own life, and the life of other targets.

Again the poster of the article felt that targets had to act out in the workplace to run afoul of anti-violence initiatives, again this poster has no idea of how zero tolerance is now working, how the psychiatric repirsials are working in conjunction with these teams. You do not have to act out, constantly complain about harassment, and you can be added to one of these lists, and be listed as having a mental health issue, this is the point that must get across to Targeted Individuals and others, this is what is happening in many cases, thus we see a lot of whistle blowers. In the community arguing with an authority figure could get you on such a list, it does not take as much as most people think it does.

Now as the research continues, I hope to introduce targets to the opperations manuals that are used for the remote monitoring, that should hopefully shed some additional light on some of the targeting that is experienced, but please feel free to do your own research in the mean time. Unlike others I do not claim to be an expert and my research into these teams continue.

I hope this gives most Targeted Inidividuals a basic understasnding of how Threat Assessment Teams work. If you truly understand the process, then you have a better idea of what is happening behind the targeting.

So let’s look at some cases.

1. Theresa Duncan. She had a workplace altercation where she had to be escorted from her building. This was the second altercation with the same individual, but they blamed Theresa. Under these violence prevention programs the incidents must be reported.

As everyone knows Theresa Duncan went on to blame her targeting on Scientology, complained of conspiracies, and she and her boyfriend Jeremy Blake later both died, listed as suicides, but many believe they were murdered.

If Ms. Duncan was evaluated as a threat to the company after her outburst and escort from the building, that could have cause passive, or active monitoring. Then start to blame a community or show a belief that they are out to get you, and these teams will increase the monitoring, and inform everyone around you, thus you notice this conspiracy and accuse everyone of being in on it. She thought it was Scientology, but the reality is that it likely began with the workplace incident. I am not discounting this group in any of her targeting, because depending on your area, each area uses different types of groups, and individuals for the monitoring. If she felt Scientologists were after her, the Threat Assessment Team would alert this group, and they would be thrown in her path without a doubt.

2. Randy Quaid. He had an incident where he upsent some coworkers. They filed a complaint and he was banned from the actors union. Now he has never said he is a Targeted Individual, but assuming that he is, this incident likely lead to his elevated Threat level and thus noticeable targeting. After he was banned, a restraining order was I believe filed against his spouse, so the company likely had them placed on active monitoring.

His brother has suggested he get a mental health exam. This is likely because he is hoping an exam will clear his brother. Most times those around you can not say anything. They believe that the system is legit and will clear the target if they get a mental health check. Unfortunately this is not always the case. Targets know that the system and company paid psychiatrist can and are often used to list targets as mentally unwell.

If Randy is a target, he was likely at some point evaluated and listed as having a mental illness. They do this and can do this legally. It’s wrong, but this is what targets have to realize. Please see the article entitled the psychiatric reprisal if you are unclear how this process works, and how someone can be listed as mentally ill without having a face to face exam.

3. Gloria Naylor. She accidentally poisoned her neighbors cat. They had been arguing for a while, having disputes, so the woman felt that it had been done on purpose. Well in that area if they felt that you deliberately murdered a pet, and well what about a person, what if you did the same to a person? Remember pets to many are like family members. The neighbor according to Gloria had connections, but the reality is even if she did not have connections, but a deep concern, and in an area like that a report, and a review of the history could have started passive, or active monitoring depending on what was reported.

The rest is as they say history. I don’t know if Gloria had anything else going on, if this woman had anyone else file a report, but at some point after this incident Gloria noticed the small things, started to complain, they likely listed her as paranoid, higher threat level, higher forms of monitoring, and so forth.

4. Ramona Lopez. She was trying to stop people from selling drugs. She realized the cops were in on it and essentially blew the whistle. Well Ramona depending on where you live, accusing the cops of dealing drugs is a paranoid disorder. We all know the police would never do that. Anyways, she also I think reported being set up for drugs, she argued with the cop if I recall correctly, which can get you listed as EDP. Emotionally Disturbed Person. Infact most of the times when we file these reports with the cops, if you get your records, you might just see them listed as EDP, no further action needed at this time.

A Targeted Individual recently posted his police report, and his complaint about the neighbor above burning him with lasers, got him listed as EDP and referred for mental health. Apparently being burnt from the neighbor above is an impossible scenario.

Remember he was reporting something simple and got listed as EDP, and referred for psychiatric assessment. Ramona Lopez was crossing the blue wall of death and in many areas, especially less affluent areas, you just can’t do that. Reporting the police as selling drugs is a paranoid belief, or so it would have been listed. Anyways she reports her targeting started shortly after trying to blow the whistle, and the rest is history. The more she complained, the more she acted out, the worst it got.

These are just a few cases, I am not an expert, I do not at this moment have conclusive proof that this is exactly how the targeting happening, but when you understand how these teams work, you can go back and get a pretty good idea of what started the targeting and why, and how these teams view the target.

The same is true for Gang Stalking, once you understand how Gang Stalking works, you can hear a target complain about surveillance, being followed, life disruptions, and get a pretty good idea or feel that this is what is likely what is happening to the target. I hope this has given some a better understanding of Threat Assessment Teams and how they work in relationship to Gang Stalking.

November 3, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Protecting that which is sacred

Protecting that which is sacred

Sometimes you have to draw a line. See people complain about the coming new world order, rights and freedoms being systemically removed, and that is all happening, but where do you draw the line?

Do you sit back and cower while these are all being taken away, grumbling in your keyboard, or do you do something about it?

The thing that I have learnt most about being a target is that you have to fight back. You have to be willing to try to protect those things that you hold sacred, or the dogs that they have yapping at our feet will try to destroy that.

As targets we see our lives systemically destroyed, some targets experience such fun things as people breaking into their homes and sabotaging the diabetic medicine for their child. Other experience car accidents, some fatal, some have had car accidents meant for them affect a loved one. We see some strange deaths in the community.

Some of the women in our community speak of being sexually assaulted while in their homes. Activists like Ramona Lopez, who tried to stand up to drug dealers in her community, only to discover that they had the full blessing of the police. Once she tried to stand up, she had her whole like torn apart, including these types of assaults. Others have even made it to the news for the same reason.

http://www.kens5.com/home/Stalked-drugged-and-raped-Is-it-happening-in-San-Antonio.html

Others have been so damaged by the weapons that they use to monitor us that they have had to have eye and other types of surgery. Some have other medical problems due to long term exposure to some of the technology used for monitoring.

Most of society really does not care. They either really don’t understand what is happening, are too shallow to really get it, or  they just have never experienced the kind of evil that we see, feel, and are exposed to. That’s fine, but then all that evil needs is for good men to do nothing.

Most people would be shocked and outraged if they were being watched in their homes. Monitored 24/7 like a prison movie, but many do not seem to understand that if it’s not acceptable for them, it should never be acceptable for anyone else. To be monitored in your home, is to give some lowlife individuals access to your person that they would not otherwise have, and it’s just as violating on many levels, as having consistent home break in’s.

Then when it come to partnerships, most targets if they are not already in a relationship have to ensure that they people that they do come across are not intimate infiltrations. People hired to enter their lives, and monitor them on the inside.

If you are lucky enough to find a good partner, then you have to hope that they are sensible. The thing that Cointelpro liked to do the most, and that these programs do is they try to break up relationships. Remember they go after the things that are important to targets. Their friends, families, their financial well being, their ability to support themselves, or those that they love. Their reputations. They will spread any and every type of rumour, and the target hardly ever has the chance to defend themselves.

With new technology they will be able to try to manipulate the dreams of people. There is technology now, that could potentially implant characters, events into dreams. I am not sure how advanced this is yet, but in future you might dream of complete strangers that you don’t know, only to have real life versions of those people manipulatively cross your path. Your subconscious might then be tricked into feeling comfortable around those people. Making them friends. The technology could be used to implant other images, other scenarios. These are sacred places that the state should have no access to, but want to.

As mentioned many times, they are working on mind reading technology, and have even hinted that they wanted to have these installed in airports. It’s scary the technology that is coming up the pipeline to an unaware population.

The thing about resisting and fighting back is that the system does not like it. Be it William Wallace, or any other such character, when you fight back against the system, they see that as an affront to their authority. See the system wants people to cower, to bow before them. They liked scared victimized people. People that are so traumatized and so broken that they will go along with anything. The system is not accustomed to fighters. To people who will hit back. They like to come out with their groups and legions, they love it when it’s not a fair fight. They love to have dozens of informants against one target, and they hope in most cases that target is going to be wimpy and break. What they do not like, and often do not expect are people who will fight back, who will not cower before this system. Yet people like William Wallace, even Jesus for his time did just that, and changed the course of history for those around them.

People can have change, but they have to be willing to fight for it. Targets are in a battle for their existence. The system will and does use every dirty trick out there. They go after our reputations, lives, and the things that we hold precious, sacred. If you thought this was something simple, or that these people are harmless trouble makers, think again, cause you would be severely wrong. These people are destructive, and targets have to do everything that they can in their power to fight back, and to protect themselves from this evil horde.

They are the same now as they have every been, and the only real way to survive, is to fight back, and resist this system in every way possible. It’s not enough at times just not go along with evil, at times you must openly oppose it. The system like cowards, yes men, people who will and do grovel at it’s will. Evil people get advanced, because they will give their full allegiance to this system. Good, decent people get destroyed, they get pushed to the way side, and if this system is every going to change, then people have to stop being unwitting agents in this regard and capacity. They must not assist evil in anyway.

This battle will not be won by sitting back and cowering. I am not even sure people want to win this battle. They like the things the system gives them, just go to the downtown core in any major city on the weekend. The things of this world keep people enslaved, but they like them so much, they would almost be willing to sell their souls for the things of this world. The system can change, but only if people want it to change. If there is not that will, not that desire, then things will remain the same. As long as society keep allowing themselves to be pacified with the things of this world, turning a blind eye to the evils at hand, then the world will be like this, and then you really should not wonder why it is like this. The answer is already there.

August 28, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Radical

So when did I become a radical? LOL.

I have been thinking about this for the last few days. When I am not being termed Conspiracy theorist, Extremist, or Crazy, I guess radical is that nice safe middle ground that some like to use.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/fashion/13psych.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/story?id=6443988&page=1

I don’t personally like terms, cause I don’t like to be boxed in like that. I don’t think I fit any one category, my activism is not extremist, some of the sources I have referenced in the past include: Loyola Law professor Alexandra Natapoff and her research into the informant system. I have referenced the ACLU in my research and their confirmation that investigations of innocent people are happening. I have also referenced people like Nikki Rappana in regards to the communitarian system and agenda 21. So my research is not extremist.


http://www.nikiraapana.com
http://www.blog.aclu.org/2009/04/30/mass-con-fusion

Is it conspiracy research?

Groups of people being followed around by informants? People doing little things to make them look crazy, or despicable? It sounds conspiracy at first, but if you read the research, I consistently back up what I say. Wither it’s reporting on the violent persons registry, or discussing how people are having full scale anti-terror investigations opened up on them for simple things like missing work, or for living in the wrong community. So I am not a conspiracy theorist in that regards, cause I do back up the research, and show cases, that are similar or near exact to some of the things that Targets report.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1195399/Woman-branded-potentially-violent-council-complaining-damaged-flowerbed.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/henryporter/2010/feb/01/ripa-act-surveillance-authorities

I have even shown that in the past, governments have used citizens to gaslight, or specifically target others to hasten an agenda. Using a program called VIK the U.K. government used Americans to target other Americans. They came up with over 500 ways to mess with targets. This again was a government initiative. So much of what I have discussed has been done, via other programs. This is without me discussing Cointelpro, McCarthyism, Stasi, etc.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/aug/19/military.secondworldwar

I am just crazy/Skizo then? I mean how can I believe that I am being targeted in this way right? Well I believe it cause it’s true. I can back up information with the research online, and sources at times have given bit’s of information here and there. I am not crazy, I am not skizo. Yet I have it on good authority that without me ever having seen a psychiatrist in any capacity, remotely I have been deemed a danger or crazy. Much of this label comes from me standing up to workplace mobbing, which was deliberate and very targeted. Much of the extreme stuff that was reported came later, after I dared to challenge this system.

http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

So after all those terms, the latest is Radical. When did I become a radical? I don’t agree with the term, cause I guess radical always put me in mind of the Black Panthers. I grew up thinking that they were anti-government trouble makers, who hated cops. This was such a misconception, I am now ashamed that this was how I veiwed them. This however is the picture that society painted of them.

The reality is that the panthers were kids. When they organized they were 17 and up, most in their teens and early 20’s. They also did not organize cause they hated police, they organized because they hated what was being done to them, and people like them in their community. Their goals were not to become anti-government extremists, no. A large part of what they did were things like free breakfast program for their community, and all these other good acts of kindness, but they were exterminated, demonized, and that is what I guess you could say radicalized them.

I guess they were radicals, but not cause they wanted to be, but because they were made to be.

So back to me. I spent the last few days thinking about this, cause I wanted to give a good answer. Like most I grew up believing the government was good, society was great. I wanted all the normal material things. I believe I lived in one of the best countries, and then cities on the planet. My life goals were simple, I wanted to find my mate, get married, and contribute to society. Simple goals, straight forward agenda, and then that changed.

I first noticed the targeting via workplace mobbing, this goes back at least a decade, and was part of the worst time in my life. The first time that I decided to try to take action it was hell, and it really shook me to the core. It was horrible that people could treat others in such a way, and yet most of the mobbing was subtle, proving it was a joke, and finally I left that job. The problem was it did not stop, at the next job the same mobbing scenario. But how? I mean it’s not as if people could communicate via some sort of network or something. Initially I just thought it was rumors traveling, you run into the odd person, who knows such and such and it goes from there. That’s what I initially thought, I know different now.

The next time the mobbing started, I was going to take a stand, and file a suit if it needed that. My employers did not stop the mobbing, I went through all the standard channels, a mistake in retrospect, they did not take the complaints seriously. Unknown to me they were using the complaints to paint me as delusional, but I was being mobbed, daily.

I finally took action outside of thee workplace and thus the wonderful world of Gang Stalking began. But I didn’t know about Gang Stalking then, but I did clue into the fact that my conversations with Lawyers were making it back to my place of employment. There was some kind of surveillance in my apartment, and yes I was being followed on the streets.

While this was going on, I had grown stronger, even if I could not win my complaint against my employer, “which I eventually just dropped due to the Gang Stalking harassment, and being tortured in my home”, at least I could help others. I could have gone forward with my case, but there was collusion, and it was happening in high places, and this made no sense. Since that time it makes perfect sense. Others have noted the same things. The patterns I had experienced were identical to many online. The perpetrators of the mobbing getting promotions, the fact that my information was out there, and an obvious interference pattern. However though until I came across the Gang Stalking information, the details about surveillance, that I had noticed, the seeming participation of people close to me, none of that made sense, then some of the pieces of the puzzles fell into place.

http://www.crvawc.ca/documents/WorkplaceHarassmentandViolencereport.pdf

http://www.bullyonline.org/action/obstruct.htm

At that stage I was still just looking for a quick fix. I realized it was retaliation from my employer, but the surveillance network made no sense, how could so many people be taking part. See they are informants, and as you move through town, through their sections of the community, stores, etc, they are given little alerts about you. You are followed into stores, and hand signals are silently communicated, all this turned up via the research.

Your whole circle of family, friends, acquaintances, co-workers, etc are contacted. Apparently you never have to be evaluated by a professional to be deemed as crazy. And why would an employer, or other nemesis that is trying to shut someone up, not be tempted to paint that person as crazy?

From what I have read, many people feel that family and friends really let them down in these cases. To be fair, if you are contacted by an official that your family or close friend could be a danger, threat, pedophile, etc. Most people would be tempted to co-operate believing that they would have a fair investigation, and not co-ordinated, underhanded, systemic destruction.  Some might even give destructive testimony, unwittingly or deliberately damaging that person in question.

The research. Let’s talk about that. I was never anti-government, but the research turned up some surprising things. Not only that this is systemic. This happens in many democratic countries, but this is happening to bright, intelligent people. Many are being systemically eliminated. That is a conspiracy. Be it workplace mobbing, which can lead to reports of Gang Stalking, people were being unfairly picked on, targeted, and eliminated. When I say eliminated I mean, driven to suicide, put in jail, falsely labeled as crazy, and locked away. Others were being provoked on the street, and much like the Nazi’s did to Jewish people, provoked and then when they lashed out put in jail. Others were getting into fatal accidents, many were deliberately being made systemically poor, having our life dreams and goals wiped away. That was bad enough, but in many cases, cause a lot of us live alone, our women were getting sexually assaulted. People like Ramona Lopez were raped. Jesus Mendoza documented how he had to watch his little girl get tortured, how he had to watch her scream at night, be burnt in her bed, and as a parent not be able to do anything, cause of what they were doing.

http://www.indigoribbon.com/Quilt/

I read about Leuren Moret a whistle-blower and her experience with Livermoor Labs. She stated that in addition to her, there were about 500 other women and minorities that she was aware of who were also targets of the university. They also had their lives systemically destroyed the same way that she did. Again one more story that shed light on this being a systemic policy for dealing with those who do not all in line, who do not follow the status quo.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2007/03/leuren-moret/

[quote]500 women and minorities had filed lawsuits against the University of California and had then experienced retaliation by the University of California apparatus of mobbing by employees, alumni and law enforcement.1The lawsuits were for denial of tenure, whistleblower retaliation and theft of intel-lectual property. These women had similar complaints about the destruction of their own lives and careers. The information gathered by the University of California is used to takeyour life apart; to destroy all that makes you feel safe; to bankrupt, isolate and alienate you from society and from yourself; and to attempt to make you look crazy.[/quote]

This was not only systemic, but it had in many cases proven to be mulit-generational. Meaning if you stand up to the system, and you have kids, those kids have a good chance of being targeted. I also read about Jeremy Blake and his lady, and their golden suicides, which I also don’t quite believe. I realized again just what this system is truly capable of, and why it must be changed, or stopped. It’s not right, it’s malignant for many, but many others protect it, give their allegiance to it, and would gladly fight for it.

With story after story, after story, after story, I saw a picture as brutal as any other oppression, as needful of exposure, and something that was hard, or going to be almost near impossible to prove. I realized we were up up against a system, and that system was not some shadow group. It was not vigilantes, it was not extremists, it was our own governments, and this system that has been set up. It’s not that different than what was done in Russia to many, or even the former East Germany. In America those who saw McCarthyism, or even Cointelpro up close should have no trouble believing it, and yet many ignore this.

Outside of Gang Stalking, I researched many other topics, Pedophile rings, Senator DeCamp and the amazing work he did trying to expose a pedophile ring, and the fate of those victims. Senator DeCamp also realized that he was up against a system, and he rightfully wondered if that system had become too corrupt. I read about Gary Webb, and his wonderful reporting, that got him demoted in his job till he had to quit, how he was found with a bullet to the head, yet another suicide, which I don’t believe for a moment. I read about the fate of the victims of the CIA drug smuggling. How they were silenced and dropped the lawsuit. I read about the fate of the African American female lawyer who tried to take on the CIA. Anita Belle lost everything. Her home, her career, he country, he livelihood. She tried to stand up to the system and it attacked.

http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org/cn/franklincoverupexcerpt.shtml

http://www.whale.to/b/webb_gary_h.html

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2007/01/anita-e-belle/

I read about how Journalists who get too close to the truth, how they are also often systemically attacked via the buzzsaw, how their careers are ruined, how they are made to look either crazy, or like they don’t know what they are talking about.

http://www.freedomofthepress.net/intothebuzzsaw.htm

All along the cyber collective consciousness, I found proof of what I was talking about. There is a system in place, that keeps everything in place, that system is corrupt and needs fixing. That system is protected, very powerful, but very evil. That system is being run by governments, their security forces. Do I believe every politician is evil? Heck no. De hamp, people like Cynthia McKinney and others have come up against this before, there are many out there who really don’t realize that their is a problem. If they do become aware, they would rather believe that evil forces have taken over the government, or that we can work within the system to fix it.

I don’t care what you believe, my job right now is doing what I have always done when I see a problem or a system of injustice. I try to make a difference. I am trying to help fix it. I am making people aware. I have been like this my entire life. I am fairly sure it’s who I have always been meant to be, and who I will always be.

So when did I become a radical? If you must call me this, and I hate labels, then I guess I have always been this way, I have been this way my entire life. If I see injustice, I try to stand up to it, expose it, make a slight difference if I can. If I see a bully I will try to stand up to them, to the best of my ability.

So let me throw this question back out there to you all. Why are you not a radical? Do you not believe that there is a problem? A conspiracy? Do you feel powerless? Why are you not out there telling the truth, cause at the end of the day, that is all that I am doing. I am telling the truth, and just trying to expose a system that has become terribly corrupt. A system that truly needs fixing. So if you see me as a radical, and not yourself, then ask yourself this. Why are you not a radical?

March 1, 2010 Posted by | Bullying, buzzsaw, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Cointelpro, Community harassment, community mobbing, Conspiracy, Controlled society, crazy, Electronic harassment, Gang Stalking, harassment, Indigo Ribbon, Informants, Insane, Laws, Minorities, mobbing, one handed signals, psychological harassment, society, Stalking, Surveillence | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Indigo Ribbon Quilt

Indigo Ribbon Quilt

November is right around the corner, and that is the month that we celebrate Indigo Ribbon Day. So if you have any stories that you would like to share, or ideas for this years Indigo Ribbon Day, please feel free to submit your stories to Gang Stalking World.

http://www.indigoribbon.com/Quilt/

Last year there was not much of an Indigo Ribbon Day. The articles that came out in the New York Times and Washington post too the focus away from the event last year, but the articles were important to be responded to. The rest of the year has been spent Bridging the Gap between what the general public understands and what we understand. Getting them up to speed. I think there has been enough information over the last year, that some of the gaps have been filled, now it’s just getting that information out to the public, which targets, local media can play a great role in. The information finally is there, it’s a matter of getting it out there in greater capacity.

Most of yesterday was spent working on the quilt. It’s one of events that was hoped for with the Indigo Ribbon Awareness Campaign and now it’s finally been started.

Starting on the quilt was emotional. Remembering stories like Jeremy Blake, Teresa Duncan, Ruth Goodman, Kyle, even the Jiverly Wong quilt was hard, because some of these people will never get justice for what was done to them. With Jiverly Wong it’s important that individuals like him have a voice, and they be remembered because despite their actions, I don’t believe that people like him, and Kimveer Gill were killers, or would have been without external forces. I believe just like what we see with the workplace shootings these individuals were driven to their ends. I am deeply sorry for their victims, but before they became what some would call monsters, they were victims of the state, and that has to be acknowledged if we are to stop future events like that from happening. That is why they must be included in the quilt.

Anyways, I hope for more uplifting stories, but getting started was interesting.

Indigo Ribbon Products

indigoribbonbutton

You can find Indigo Ribbon and related products by clicking on the image above.

The Indigo Ribbon Campaign is meant to be a voice to the many innocent targets of Government campaigns, mobbing, Gang Stalking, mind control, Electronic Harassment, etc. The idea behind the campaign is to provide information and awareness.

This year the campaign will focus on a quilt, it’s a quilt to commensurate those that have died, those in jail, falsely placed in mental institutions, driven to suicide, murdered, etc.

Only by continuing to make others aware, can we begin to make a difference.

October 9, 2009 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Domestic terrorists. They are amongst us.

Domestic terrorists. They are amongst us.
What does this term really mean?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States
“the unlawful use of force or violence, committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”[2]
So unlawful use of force or violence. By one more more individuals, against a person, their property to intimidate, or coerce, a civilian population or any segment, to further political or social objectives.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have domestic terrorist amongst us. They are in use everyday in many democratic countries.

 

Ruth Goodman

[quote]I am a philosopher/writer who was posting my writings on the Internet for a period of about 5 years, ignoring the online harassment I often received.

I was also contacted at home, in my personal life by a couple of men who work for the government… Brian Kohler, with the D.O.D. (I know this is his real name, I have been to his and his parents home in Fairfax Virginia. His father, Larry Kohler, works for the Pentagon) pretended at first to be in love with me, this was 5 years ago when I was more naive. He flew out to California several times pretending he was going to relocate to move in with me. It turned out that he was lying, and was actually stalking me for counter intelligence. His intimidation kept me from writing on the internet for about a year, but then I went back to doing it, refusing to give in to terrorists.

 

About a year and a half ago I was contacted by another man, Jason Duncan (not sure if this is his real name) made similar contact with me pretending to be a friend interested in discussing spiritual principles. While at my apartment he staked out the neighborhood, and a couple of months later, stalkers moved into the house behind my balcony, built a HIGH wall, and they gather there harrassing me from behind this wall. After one of Jason’s visits with me I became extremely ill (I thought I had food poisening), and was taken to the emergency room closest to my home, very late at night, and was put out with a general anesthetic for 4 hours.

About a day or two later I began to experience people harassing me in my head. I can TELL they are using electronic devices to do so. I do not know where on my body they planted the transmitters, but I have found fake hairs protuding out of the back of my neck and behind my ears. My hairline is not the same as it was before. These tiny hairs come from my temples and go under the skin behind my ears.

These people continue to harrass me in my head, screaming “Stay off the internet” and “we control everything” etc.

They also had me picked up in front of my house by a Long Beach policeman, alone with no name badge, who drugged me, met an LA County sherrif behind a dark building, who was also alone. He got on the freeway. When I asked “where are you taking me?” his response was “someplace fun”.

They took me to a secluded section of LA County Jail where I was brutally beaten, stripped naked, fondled and tortured by male sherrifs, and told over again that “we’re gonna smoke you, n*gger” while guns were brandished in front of me. I was also repeated drugged with something that made me unable to control myself. I was held for 5 days with no phone call until my sister reported me missing. I was then charged with being under the influence of drugs.

Please help me if you can. I am not sure where to turn. It seems they follow me and make sure that people I talk to are also harrassed.[/quote]
Ruth ofcourse died shortly after these events. What brought me back to these stories is the research that I have been doing into the extremist communities. See the government is trying to sell us the next thing to be afraid of. The domestic terrorist. That lone individual that might go off and commit unforeseen terrorism.

However after researching the extremist community, I realise that we in the Targeted Individual community are already dealing with domestic terrorists and we do so ever single solitary day. The extremist that the government are now trying to see are nothing compared to what we are experiencing. If right wing extremists did the above mentioned things to Ruth Goodman, that the government and it’s agents of terror did, she could have gone to the ACLU, and many other organizations to have them investigated and to have the actions against them stopped, but because she was a Targeted Individual, she had no where to turn, and no agency willing to take on her harassers, and eventually she died, under what were listed as unusual circumstances.

Domestic Terrorists use violence and force, to achieve their objectives. As Targeted Individuals we have domestic terrorism being used against us everyday. Many of us do not recognize it as such, but that’s what it is, and our governments, and fellow citizens are using this against us.
Force and Violence.
The force and violence being used against us is two fold. First we have physical violence being used against us, such as when the informants are allowed to use electronic means of harassment. Be it lasers, radar guns, electronic weaponry, the rewiring of the electricity in our apartments, directed energy weapons, or what have you, this is using force and violence.

They also use force and violence when they try to hit some of us with their cars, or deliberately assault us, they use violence when they force Targeted Individuals off the road, killing some and injuring others.

Some of the women in the Targeted Individual community have complained about rapes, sexual assaults.

People have said that their children have been harassed at school, even beaten up sometimes.

Targets are routinely baited, by being banged into, and other forms of physical interference, and incitement.

Noxious chemicals are used to make targets sick and ill.

People’s animals and pet’s have been mutilated, tortured and killed.
Ramona Lopez
http://www.targetedindividuals.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=135
[quote]
“During our investigation, which started more than 10 years ago, we actually found out that law enforcement targets some children in order to get them on drugs or in trouble with the law. It really is a systematic program to keep the drug market profitable as well as a way to destroy whole families and communities.”

Although Mrs. Lopez is still fighting for justice in her southern California community with other like minded citizens, she has been a target along with her family members, the target of extreme government abuse, including death threats, assaults, drive-by gun shootings, gang stalking, breaking and entering, drugged after being assaulted in her home with needles, micro-chipped by assailants and the victim of continuous electronic weaponry.

Not only has Lopez been targeted by covert operatives, but so has her children, as well as her five-year- old grand daughter, who has been micro-chipped in the same manner as Flores.

“I have taken my case to the highest authorities, but nothing ever happens and the abuse continues even to this day,” said Lopez, who said all she ever wanted to do was to help children in her community stay in school and lead a more productive lives. “I have had numerous chips removed by doctors, chips acting as conductors so the electrical impulses they use have a more sever and devastating effect.”

“When the harassment first started years ago, they attacked me with needles in my bedroom. I remember getting up the next morning with needle marks all over my body. I then found out I was micro-chipped. There have been times I get hit so hard with the impulses I feel like I am going to die from a heart attack. These people need to be stopped because I am not the only one around the country going being attacked like this. I have talked to others like me and it is a pattern of abuse and harassment being used all over the country. If they would even do this to my grand daughter, do you think they would hesitate doing it to you?”

Although Mrs. Lopez has been attacked and violated on almost every level, she still is seeking fighting to make her community a better place to live, becoming one of the more well-known figures ion the community as well as receiving several community leadership awards.[/quote]
Ramona Lopez was an innocent woman who wanted to get drugs off the streets and help her community. For that she was Gang raped in her home, micro chipped, set up for drugs, has experienced Gang Stalking, her very innocent and young grand daughter who was five years old at the time has been micro chipped and harassed. Drive by shootings, intimidation, often times by the police? Does this sound right to you?

If this stuff had gone on in the American south during slavery, there would have been some help, some kind of community to turn to, but because this is being done by the state, there is very little help or assistance. But this is true domestic terrorism. Again if extremists were the ones perpetrating this against Romana Lopez, this would have been stopped a long time ago, and there would have been an outcry, but because these acts of domestic terrorism are being committed by the state, and agents of the state, there is no help for her, and the harassment has continued.

Because Gang Stalking is often multi-generational, you see that her grand daughter had already become a target, and will most likely be targeted. If this was being done by extremist to a family decade after decade, by now there would be an outcry, but there has not been.

These people might not be burning crosses on lawns, wearing hoods, but in my opinion is the actions being committed are 10 times worst, because at least society if such actions as crosses being burnt were committed, society would see it for what it is, but in our cases, the crimes being committed against us are sanctions and carried out by the state, our neighbours and communities and they often do not see the problems with what is being done to us.
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1239780728

[quote]

I want to share some details of my experience with gangstalking. This is going to sound unbelievable, but please bear with me.

The worst experience I’ve had so far is discovering that someone somehow came into my home while I was away and contaminated my 11 year old son’s insulin bottles. He was just diagnosed about a year and a half ago with type I diabetes. Anyway, I had been keeping track of the amount of insulin in the bottles, so it was obvious that they had been tampered with when the volume of liquid in the bottles suddenly doubled within a few hours on the same day. It appeared like someone had added water or some other clear liquid to the insulin, rendering it unusable.
[/quote]
Had the mother failed to notice this descrepancy, we do not know what would have happened to her child, and there is no way to tell what the extra added liquid was.

 

Psychological force and violence.
Targets are often stalked. They have false rumours spread about them. Such as being pedophiles, rapists, etc. These rumours leave targets open to physical violence, or assaults.

Targets are often stalked by their community at large, for years at a time even though they are innocent in many cases.

Targets are called names, their privacy is invaded.

Officials such as police and fire fighters are also used as part of the campaign of psychological violence, in some cases to intimidate targets.

They are at times blacklisted because of falsely being labelled.

Their livelihoods are interfered with.

These are a small sample of what targets go through and experience.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/07/361691.shtml

[quote]

FBI surveillance of my son

My son’s account of being relentlessly dogged by the FBI and local law enforcement agents. He and his friend, Kyle, built a model rocket out of boredom one day, as they had learned to do a middle school class years earlier.

Eli endured extreme mental distress during the period of surveillance, as did Kyle. We feel the stress contributed to Kyle’s suicide on 7/2/06.
Eli
In 2005 my residence was entered by two Federal Bureau of Investigations agents and a North Bend Police Officer. Federal Agent William Soulle and FBI Bomb Technician John Hallock, accompanied by Officer Jeff Bohannen, entered my residence and seized several computers, books, papers, scraps of plastic, paint, glue and other miscellaneous items which were related to what they called an “imminent terrorist threat” and would be used to “determine the intent” of the device I will mention in a moment. This would be the beginning of a five-month long investigation which would include FBI tails, line-taps, surveillance, and in one scenario, being stopped early one morning at an improvised roadblock on a rural road.

So, what did I do to earn the scorn of the Federal Bureau of Investigations?

My friend and I, out of boredom, constructed a device to launch a model rocket. A model-rocket-launcher if you will. According to the FBI, however, we had constructed a lethal and highly-illegal device similar to what was being produced by insurgents in Iraq. News of our “Improvised Anti-Personnel Weapon” (IAW), we would find out, would make it all the way to Washington D.C., to both an anti-terrorist task force at the Pentagon as well as to the desk of the President of the United States of America.

It quickly became apparent that we were in a situation with the U.S. Government that had the potential to be highly-volatile, that could end in arrest and detention in undisclosed locations, or worse.

But, how did it get to this point?

The day Kyle and I finished the device, we decided to test-fire it in what we perceived to be a safe location in the nearby area. The location was ideal. It was on a dirt lot away from any property or timber that could be damaged, an area I had practiced target shooting with my bow years prior. It was an area that a lot of local kids, like I had done, visited frequently to light off firecrackers and shoot slingshots without getting into huge trouble or burning something down.

Kyle and I put the launcher into the cab of my Ford Ranger and, followed by my father (who decided to come along to take pictures), headed to the area which was located just down the road from our house. As we pulled into the lot, the ignition switch was touched somehow and the rocket ignited in the truck, filling the cab with smoke, resembling a particular scene from a Cheech & Chong movie. No damage done. At that exact moment, however, a squad car pulled in behind us and turned his lights on.

My truck was searched, the launcher was seized and given over to the State Police. From there, it was handed over to the FBI in Salem. Little did we know, the property I had been visiting for years was newly-acquired airport property. Now it was a matter of National Security, a matter which would produce search warrants and affidavits issued by the U.S. Department of State, and would begin long and far-reaching federal investigations against all three of us.

During that time I was tailed everywhere I went, my phones were tapped, my mother’s phones were tapped, Kyle’s phones were tapped and my father’s phones were tapped. I was followed in the local area, tailed by unmarked cars as well as police, and even followed on several trips to a location three hours south of my hometown. My email accounts were being obviously monitored and about once a day emails would go missing and reappear, or I would be unable to login to any of my accounts during short periods of time throughout the day. The FBI was not making any attempt to conceal their surveillance measures. I almost completely stopped using phones and e-mail, and rarely strayed from preset courses when traveling in an attempt to identify surveillance vehicles. A word of advice to anyone under investigation…everything is surveillance. Fear ruled my life. I stopped sleeping, I stopped talking, I stopped traveling. I started listening, watching and making note of everything–trusting nothing and nobody. If it looked like a trick, it was…and there was nothing I could do to stop it, so I just had to live with it.

Since that time I’ve been afraid to say anything at all. I know that within the borders of this country, if you are intelligent and eloquent, you are to be considered extremely dangerous.

It is after much consideration that I’ve decided to start this blog in hope of sharing things which are of interest to me with others and creating an open forum where these things can be discussed and where our ideas can be shared.

[/quote]

In this case you might think that they deserved the harassment because they built a simple rocket, but think about your own children, and families and what simple actions could start and investigation? Most times all it takes is the word of an informant, or you standing up for and asserting your rights.

 
Committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals
The domestic terrorism is carried out by many people. Often these people who are committing these acts are informants. Some are also criminals who are used to commit illegal acts, actions on targets, with the blessing of their handlers. Some are hardcore criminals who are used to rape, or assault, kill, main, or hurt a target, their children or their pets. Many informants would be alarmed or even horrified if they knew about this aspect of the targeting and the true nature of what they were taking part in, but unfortunately because they work as a team with these perpetrators for the state, they are just as culpable and guilty of domestic terrorism as the true fiends, who commit a lot of the deplorable actions.
http://www.oneagleswingsfearnoevil.com/

[quote]
My life soon paralleled a Hollywood movie: Enemy of the State was a film released in 1998 starring the
actor, Will Smith. Billed as a thriller, it was the story of a young successful lawyer whose life was thrust
into turmoil when he stumbled upon information that could implicate some high-level government
officials. The story could have been ripped from the pages of my life as I stumbled into the political
corruption in North Carolina politics. I wandered blindly into a system beset with  the theft of federal
block grant money, police brutality, and child abuse. Hollywood hails the lives of corporate whistle
blowers such as Erin Brockovich, Norma Rae, and Jeffrey Wigand. They are cast as heroes, but there are
no Hollywood heroes among the thousands of political whistle blowers who suffer retaliation, threats,
intimidation, harassment, and financial hardship on a daily basis. And the Supreme Court’s decision last
year that disallows whistle blowing as a protection under the First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, will
succeed in dis incentives for Americans to speak-up, when the purest act of patriotism is protecting our
nation from crimes against humanity, corruption, and government waste. Democracies die behind closed
doors, and yet, most whistle blowers pay dearly for their candor at the hands of governmental agencies
that were established to protect them. At sixty-two years old, I was falsely arrested with my hands
cuffed behind my back, and tossed into the back of  a patrol car with the orders to”slide your fanny
over.”

The acts of retaliation and harassment against whistle blowers have become so wide spread that some
of the individuals have organized. The organization is known as TI for targeted individuals. Our numbers
are in the hundreds of thousands. We are activist, whistle blowers, and honest American citizens who
love this country and are determined to bring attention to this cancer on our democracy. Our web page
will soon bear the names and stories of the thousands of “Targeted Individuals.” Most , but no all, are
educated blacks and whites who fight for justice for the poor, the elderly, and the youth.

Following my false arrest, I sought help from the Justice Department, the NAACP, my Senators, the
ACLU and the FBI. I sent certified letters to Mr. Mueller at the FBI and to Mr. Gonzales at the Justice
Department at least three times each and never received a response. I am sure that those letters were
never delivered.I traveled to the Justice Department to see the case manager who had found “cause” to
pursue my false arrest case. In Washington, DC, I  was denied access to the building by armed guards. A
Florida senator finally responded to my letter and required the FBI to talk to me. Agent John Rowan
called me quite concerned about my situation, and we made an appointment to meet. When I arrived for
my appointment, Agent Rowan was not available, instead, I met with Agent Griffin who promised to help.
I never heard another word. Agent Taylor in the Wilmington office of the FBI sat across from me with a
smirk on his face and announced that the “FBI is not going to investigate this case,”  even though an FBI
spokesman remarked, “the FBI thoroughly investigates all allegations of wrongdoing.”

My book, “Sadly, My Eyes Were Opened” is being written to encourage the thousands of whistle blowers,
who have been abandoned by government and public apathy, that they are not  alone. When the word
“whistle blower” is “Goggled,”  the site reveals over one million, six hundred thousand hits.
[/quote]
Targeted by police, and other political figures. She exposed corruption and child sexual abuse, but was targeted for her efforts and became a Targeted Individual. Her successful political and business career were both destroyed as a result. She also says that her children’s careers are being interfered with as a result of the mobbing she has experienced. If society found out that a group of extremists were running a child pedophile ring, there would likely be an investigation and they would be demonized accordingly, but in many of these cases that I came across, the perpetrators, move forward, and their victims and those who would blow the whistle are the one’s that suffer, and I have to ask myself, why is it like this? Why is it wrong if one group commits these actions, but society ignores, covers up, participates, when it’s being conducted by the state?

 

Political or social objectives
In this case the political and social objectives that are being achieved vary, sometimes it’s to silence a target. Eg. Many employers are having these investigations opened on employers that will not be silence, whistle blowers.

Sometimes these tactics are used on individuals that do not fit the status quo, and so therefore it’s used to get them to fall in line.

These physical and psychological means work together to achieve the same ends.

We have domestic terrorists amongst us, and in many cases they are those who are working for what they believe is a worthy cause, but in many cases, it’s just domestic terrorism disguised as working towards a worthy cause on innocent individuals.

 

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=69

Anita Belle
[quote]

A Florida attorney suing the federal government alleged that seven car accidents occurring on or around her court deadlines were deliberately staged counter-intelligence program (COINTELPRO) murder attempts. When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal appellate rulings that the alleged COINTELPRO was frivolous, the attorney sought political asylum in Canada. Then, despite undisputed evidence of being disbarred from practicing law without due process, the high court upheld the Florida Supreme Courts ruling that disbarred the whistle-blowing attorney.
Anita E. Belle, a black female practicing law in Florida, alleged that COINTELPRO reared its ugly head against her after she filed cases on behalf of blacks and whites in seven states harmed due to the Central Intelligence Agency or CIAs role in importing illegal drugs into black communities. She alleged that at least one reputed CIA agent admitted the agency conspired with organized crime to use illegal drugs as a means of pharmaceutically enslaving African-Americans. In early 2000, five of her seven cases were consolidated as the Nicaraguan Contras Narcotics Trafficking Litigation, MDL 1331, in the federal court in Gainesville, Florida.
Belle claims that the cases became so sabotaged that she and her family were forced to flee Florida in fear of their lives. She first moved to North Carolina, but left there after witnesses in the CIA cases were threatened. She then returned to her hometown of Detroit, Michigan.
[/quote]

She was just a lawyer trying to protect the rights of people who had been enslaved, due to drugs being deliberately brought into their communities, by their own government. For her efforts, her life was ruined, her career destroyed, her children were targeted, she fled from state to state, then to Canada, and finally to Israel. This is the true definition of domestic terrorism, and it happens every day to Targeted Individuals.

If an extremist group did half the things that were done to Anita Belle, they would likely be in jail, or under investigation. There would have been some kind of outcry, but because those carrying out the actions were of the state, she was ignored, and the terrorism used against her allowed to continue. 
These incidents are not limited, they happen across a wide spectrum and many companies are using these investigations, to destroy employees. Lauren Moret, came across over 500 women, and minority that were being targeted this way by just one company.

[quote]Lauren Moret called it, and what we call it.
 
As I approached the gate with my office belongings piled in my car, I felt an incredible lightness of being. I dropped off my badge and beeper and got back in my car, laughing and thinking, “You just got out of jail!” Little did I know what was ahead. The next 10 years were the darkest of my life and I am lucky to be alive today. My great-est gift was the discovery of my inner strength to be able to survive the retaliation, mobbing and harassment by the Livermore Lab, the University of California and the Oakland police department. Prophetically, an acquaintance coolly said to me a year after I left the lab, “You are in a police net you will never get out of … for the rest of your life.” She was right, but I no longer care because now I am not afraid. 
 
We are controlled by our fears until we have none left, and that happens when there is nothing left to lose. The journey to that realization took 12 years of pain, a sense of loss and humiliation, a feeling of abandonment and the lifelong emptiness and absence of being loved—not by any-one, not at any time. The experience and purpose of being mobbed, and what I did not knowin the isolation of the experience, is that I was not alone.“Mobbing” is the purposeful and strategic institutional gathering of all information about an individual by using any method—legal or illegal. Contact for this purpose is made with neighbors, classmates, former partners, family members, former employers, teachers, church members, good friends and even your family tree … everything must be known about the support system around you that makes your life possible. The assessment of strategic resources and future income (finances, mobility, cars, insur-ance, credit cards, bank safety deposit boxes, post office boxes, wills, health records, birth 

 
Page 3 
Uncovering the Truth About Depleted Uranium49certificates, transcripts and photographs) is made without your knowledge. The purpose ofmobbing is to drive the target individual out of the job force for the rest of their life; the big-ger goal is to drive them to the ultimate self-destruction: suicide. There are now laws made by European unions to prevent this cancer on society and productivity, but it is practically unknown in the U.S.The University of California, which had contributed so much to the State of California and to the global community through the benefits of education, had become a pathologi-cally dysfunctional institution through its mobbing practices. 
 
I learned that more than 500 women and minorities had filed lawsuits against the University of California and had then experienced retaliation by the University of California apparatus of mobbing by employees, alumni and law enforcement.1The lawsuits were for denial of tenure, whistleblower retaliation and theft of intel-lectual property. These women had similar complaints about the destruction of their own lives and careers. The information gathered by the University of California is used to takeyour life apart; to destroy all that makes you feel safe; to bankrupt, isolate and alienate you from society and from yourself; and to attempt to make you look crazy. 
 
Your children are harassed, they come home with belongings missing and stories of teachers harassing them and a weirdness takes over your lives. Slowly, documents disappeared from my house; porncharges appeared on my credit card; files, my purse and my keys disappeared; mail was lost. I was forced to carry my documents with me at all times. All of my university transcripts and diplomas have been stolen from my house.Two things kept me going and kept me alive. First, the warrior mother spirit guided me to protect Zephyr. That miracle of life taught me what it means to love unconditionally and completely. I began to learn to love myself. Second, my uncle had told me long ago, “No one can destroy you. Only you can destroy yourself.”  [/quote]

Again if an extremist group was going these actions, it would be exposed for what it is. Yet this practice continues in society, endorsed, and encouraged.

As Targeted Individuals we are harassed, degraded, tortured, humiliated, violated, interfered with on a daily bases. The actions of our perpetrators are monstrous, and they are indeed domestic terrorists, but because their actions are sanctioned by the state, our terrorism goes ignored. Those organisations that would be all over our targeting if it was being done by an extremist group, sit silently by and ignore and thus silently sanction what is happening to us.

Domestic Terrorism is happening in our countries, it’s happening everyday. It’s happening to you and to me. Do you think that it’s not your problem?

Remember that these acts of domestic terrorism often lead to acts of violence. If you have not been paying attention to the names in the news, several of the shooters over the last several years, have been those who were under investigation, who could not take their targeting anymore and thus took it out on members of society, who were apathetic to their suffering.
Kimveer Gill
http://crimene.ws/2006/09/14/the-blogroll-on-kimveer-gill/comment-page-1/
[quote]
Page 2 of Kimveer Gill’s “fatality666 journal was a little more telling. He seemed to jot things down online, short entries, thoughts posted in passing.

He posted the following in separate entries dated September 12, 2006:

“Stop Bullying

    It’s not only the bully’s fault you know!!
    It’s the teachers and principals fault for turning a blind eye, just cuz it’s not their job. You fuckers are pathetic.
    It’s the police’s fault for not doing anything when people conplain (oops, my mistake, the cops are corrupt sons of whores, so it’s not like they can do anything about it.)

    FUCK THE POLICE

    It’s society’s fault for acting like it’s normal for people to be assholes to each other. Society disgusts me.
    It’s everyone’s fault for being so apathetic towards fucking everything that doesn’t affect them personally. FUCK YOU SOCIETY.”

 
“I wonder why my household has been under surveillance by law enforcement for 6 years now? Makes no sense to me!!”

[/quote]
As some will remember Kimveer is now known for the Dawson College shooting. If you go back however and you learn about Kimveer, many people describe him originally as a sweet and quite boy, this did not come about over night. The changes that lead to the shooting were created, and in time he became a killer, but his history does not show that he was this personality type, till driven to these actions, in my opinion, based on much of the research that I have done into this shooting, and this shooter.

 

Jiverly Wong

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/jiverly-wong-two-sides/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/jiverly-wong-letter-from-a-ti-perspective/

[quote]
The first I want to say sorry I know a little English. I hope you understand all of this. Of course you need to know why I shooting? Because undercover cop gave me a lot of ass during eighteen years I got seven years and eight month delivery to grocery in the California came back New York on the August 2007. [/quote]
 

[quote]Let talk about when I live in California. Such as…cop used 24 hours the technique of ultramodern and camera for burn the chemical in my house. For switch the channel time…For adjust the fan. For made me unbreathable. For made me vomit. For connect the music into my ear.

[/quote]
[quote]Undercover cop usual coined some nasty was not true about me and spread a rumour to the receiver and some people know me conduce toward many people predudiced and selfish to me…cop made me lost my job…cop put me became poor. [/quote]

[quote]Let talk about when I live at the 28 Baker St. 2nd Floor, Johnson City, New York 13790. It terrible when I live there such as…cop wait until midnight when I off the light and went to the bed. Cop unlock my door and came in take a sit in my room ((cop did it thirteen time on the year 1994 )) on the thirteen time had three time touch me when I sleeping. One time stolen 20 dollar in my wallet. One time used electric gun shoot at the behind my neck. (That time I did not know English) [/quote]
What Mr Wong described was close to 20 years of Rumors, slander, lies, provocations, and harassment often by the very people expected to be protecting him.

He spoke of rumours, those same rumours about a bank robbery, him being a drug addict, a loser who lost his jobs, divorced, etc. When I looked into these stories I found that they were not true. There was no bank robbery, but an informant had said he had a drug problem and was going to rob a bank. They spoke of his divorce, but his own parents knew nothing of him ever being married. He had not been fired from either of his job, but these were the rumours and slander that were left to hang in the air about him after his death.

The rumours had been supplied to the papers by the very police he claimed had been stalking him for close to 20 years. If you are familiar with the techniques used on targets when they are under surveillance, you can read the translation of his letter here, and see that he was very clearly trying to tell us what had been happening to him.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/jiverly-wong-letter-from-a-ti-perspective/

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1239097055

Where was society to make the corrections after his death? Instead even into his death the lies and rumours were allowed to persist. Society took no responsibility for the terror that they helped create. He experienced domestic terrorism for close to 20 years, and then finally snapped, and we saw the end result of this in his shooting of all those people, but nothing is getting done to stop these investigations, they are ongoing and worst than ever.

People are being targeted for being Ron Paul supporters, or even for their conspiracy views. Where are the guidelines, where are the agencies to stop these tortures and these abuses from happening? These terrorists in many cases are being manufactured, to incite fear, to justify the existence of these programs, yet where are the agencies to put this type of domestic terrorism in it’s place?

 

Keith de Roux

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/droege-the-right-and-the-system-in-between/

[quote]Friday said the 44-year-old Deroux’s cocaine addiction was fuelling ‘paranoid delusions’ that listening devices and cameras had been placed in his apartment. The drug addict believed someone was sending him coded messages through his computer and, even after moving to a new residence, Deroux feared people were entering his house through an underground tunnel and funnelling “noxious gases” into the residence. The only person with enough resources for this kind of surveillance, Deroux figured, was his friend and cocaine dealer, Wolfgang Droege. … [/quote]
These killings are happening all over the place, and what is behind them in many cases are the same things. Yet we have a complacent media that just writes of these complaints as paranoia, or crazy.

The ACLU now admits these types of investigations are ongoing, but still there is no responsible agency to curtail what is happening.
http://blog.aclu.org/2009/04/30/mass-con-fusion/#more-5320

[quote]
“You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to?”

[/quote]
Targets are still being victimized day in day out. Yet we are being told to fear extremists? As a Targeted Individual, I personally find the actions of these people, these informants to be far more frightening, abhorrent, and deplorable, considering who they are acting on behalf of.

As it is, we must fight this brand of Domestic Terrorism on our own, we must raise our own brand of awareness, fight our own battles, and keep telling our stories of what is happening, day in day out. Only we have the power to help ourselves, and it’s clear that we must, because no responsible agency is going to step in and do it, and our fellow citizens have failed to realise that this is what they should really be looking out for, this invisible, yet truly lethal and insidious brand of domestic terrorism that they are not told about, or warned about.

Domestic Terrorists are amongst us, but they are not often the ones that the state would like us to believe.
If you want to read more about Gang Stalking, or would like to learn more, you can now purchase Bridging The Gap, which is available at Amazon.com and it’s a nice introduction. Share the book with friends or family.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1441448845

June 17, 2009 Posted by | activism, Baiting, Black female, black women, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Cointelpro, Community harassment, Conspiracy, Controlled society, Corruption, Covert investigations, crazy, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The real fight

After doing a lot of research, I see that all paths lead back to the same source.

The real fight is not going to be exposing Gang Stalking. I believe what is happening to us has been exposed, or will be exposed in due time. The bigger picture is what has to be exposed, the real fight is against the system.

After reading over some of Carissa Conti’s work. Chasing Phantoms.

http://in2worlds.net/

I read about her personal investigations into her abductions, and gang stalking. I do now realise that there is more commonality with the phantoms that are being chased than I ever realised.

After listening to the Ramona Lopez’s interview and all the other readings I have done about the drug rings, it all goes back to the same source, the same phantom menace.

Gary Webb died, but not before he was able to publish his report called the dark alliance, which showed the the CIA were directly responsible for importing drugs into ethnic minority communities.
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/webb.html

Many others have drawn the same conclusions about the government and their involvement into drugs. When a lawyer name Anita E. Bell tried to take on the system, she was forced to flee from one country to the next, after being targeted by the system. She lost her right to practice law, lost her home, her kids were targeted, she fled from America to Canada and eventually fled to Isreal.

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=69

All traces of her story seemed to have almost vanished from the Internet over the last year. 
After reading about the pedophile rings, not just what was happening in the catholic church, cause that was one small microbe of what happens in the rest of society. I again see that we are chasing the same phantom.
This means that even after the truth comes out, as it did with Senator John W. DeCamp’s investigation into who was behind the pedophile ring, nothing will happen, nothing will change. In this story children came forward to say that they had been used as drug mules and for all kinds of weird, kinky sex by high level people. I mean we are talking politicians, people with money, etc.

The investigations were stopped eventually, some kids were thrown in jail, others threatened, went missing, etc. The people who were being accused, eventually went onto higher positions in government, or other prominent careers, only a low level drug dealer  was ever convicted for any of this.

When Senator DeCamp investigated this, he found again the same thing, which he documents in his book
the Franklin Cover up, and he found out the reason nothing get’s done, it’s all about protecting the system. The innocent will be sacrificed to protect this system.

http://www.thelawparty.com/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/franklincoverupexcerpt.shtml
[quote]http://educate-yourself.org/cn/franklinc…erpt.shtml
Those were the last words I spoke with the Judge on the case. I left his chambers, burnt out, but angry. And I forgot all about Billy Budd, until the night I happened upon the movie. The story of Billy Budd is set in the British Navy near the end of the eighteenth century. Billy was a young sailor, who, although impressed into the British Navy, bore no ill will to the authorities for having dragooned him; indeed, he was the very picture of innocence and good-will, and was almost universally loved aboard his war-ship. One officer, however, developed an insane jealousy of Billy, and set out to frame him up for allegedly inciting mutiny. Since there had been several notorious mutinies in the British fleet at the time, the mere whisper of “mutiny” was enough to spread panic among the ship’s officers.

To make a long story short, because of certain incriminating appearances in the case, the captain and his senior officers, although they knew Billy was innocent of all charges, nonetheless sentenced him to hang, a necessity – as they viewed it – to “save the system,” not just on their own ship, but in the British fleet as a whole.

Now I think I do understand the Franklin case. I know, now, that all the public officials involved in Franklin-whether they ever heard of Billy Budd or not-fully understood what they were doing.

And what they all have done, and will continue to do in this case, Franklin, and no doubt many others like it, is this: Protect the “system” at all costs. The “system” is the only ultimate sacred cow-not any particular law or constitution, but only “the system.” Because, ultimately, it is the system which makes certain that the individuals functioning within it – from judges to lawyers, to prosecutors, to politicians, to businessmen – have their places and positions, and opportunities and pecking order, and future.

And, though it is unfortunate, that on occasion the protection of the “system” requires the deliberate sacrifice of perfectly innocent people, that is hoped overall to be the exception rather than the rule. But without the “system” . .

But then I have one final, nagging question. How do I know when, or if, the “system” itself has become so corrupted, that evil is the rule, rather than the exception? And when that occurs, what do I do about it? But I think I know the answer to that one – my oId commanding officer in Vietnam told me what I had to do. I made some promises to Bill, and I intend to keep them.

John DeCamp 
 
[/quote]

There was suppose to be a documentary called conspiracy of silence on the discovery channel, in 1994 about this, but the information was pulled, when influential members of congress applied pressure to the cable industry.
Dick Nadeau reveals information about pedophiles in prominent positions in Cornwall, Ontario. He passed away in 2006. Another case where justice will not be rendered. http://www.projecttruth2.com/

There was a police officer in this story, Dunlop, he was mobbed out of work, had to move to another provide for trying to do the right thing, so many people in these stories who try to do the right thing, get tortured for trying to do the right thing, for exposing these criminal elements. The sad part is also the fact that the society they are trying help, by exposing this corruption, often does not help or protect them in turn, and it’s a shame.

There are other stories, but the same M.O. the more they investigate, people in positions of authority, with power, to pull strings. Many of these investigations go back to government or the church, and those in high level postions.
Gang Stalking, Mind Control, it’s all the same things. We are small appendages fighting the same thing. Think of it as an octopus. Eight arms, Each arm corrupt. If you are not seeing the bigger picture, you are fighting one arm of corruption, and another person is fighting a different arm of corruption, but it’s all coming from the same beast.

After investigating this for two years, view others and the indepth research that they have done, and my own, in my opinion it’s the government.

We in today’s society have information about Cointelpro, Mind Control Projects, such as MK. Ultra, where the Canadian government paid out million recently in apology for allowing such atrocities to happen.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2007/01/08/brainwashing-suit.html

[quote]Dr. Ewen Cameron, an American doctor who believed he could erase the memories of patients and rebuild their psyches, was recruited by the CIA to experiment with mind-control techniques beginning in 1950.

Cameron gave patients LSD and subjected them to massive and multiple electroshock treatments. Some underwent sleep deprivation or total sensory deprivation. Others were kept in drug-induced comas for months on end while speakers under their pillows broadcast messages for up to 16 hours a day.

The experiments were part of a larger CIA program called MK-ULTRA, which also saw LSD administered to U.S. prison inmates and patrons of brothels without their knowledge, according to testimony before a 1977 U.S. Senate committee.

The CIA eventually settled a class-action lawsuit by test subjects, including Huard, and the Canadian government ordered a judicial report into Cameron’s experiments.

The allegations have not been proven in court.

The McGill experiments were jointly funded by the U.S. spy agency and the Canadian government.
[/quote]

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2007/07/04/qc-brainwashingsettlement0704.html

[quote]A Montreal senior who survived Cold War-era brainwashing experiments picked up a cheque for compensation from the federal government on Tuesday.

Janine Huard, 79, accepted an offer to end her class-action lawsuit against the federal government, which jointly funded the experiments with the Central Intelligence Agency.

The terms of the settlement are confidential, but Huard says it will allow her to live out her days in peace, with some peace of mind.

[/quote]

When Tim Field started to look into what he called collusion behind bullying, he wanted to know what the connection was, between judges, lawyers, tribunals, etc. He died before he could investigate, but not before he was able to formulate a link.

http://www.bullyeq.com/bol/action/obstruct.htm

[quote]Many targets of bullying report that they seem to be obstructed every step of the way in their pursuit of justice. The management refuse to investigate, or use an untrained investigator, or whitewash the case. The union refuses to help, or initially shows interest but suddenly changes sides. The solicitor initially shows interest but then starts acting in a manner which suggests they have the other side’s interests at heart rather than yours.

The employer’s lawyers apply for, and obtain, adjournment after adjournment, then obtain a pre-hearing review which the tribunal chairman handles in favour of the employer. In the tribunal, favour is shown to the respondent (employer) and you get the impression that the verdict has been decided in advance. Your solicitor, the respondent’s lawyers and the tribunal chairman seem to know more about your case than you think they should.

After the tribunal you’re left with no option but to privately sue the employer, the union, and your solicitor, and appeal the tribunal decision, but by this time you have no job, no income, your savings are gone, so is your health, maybe your marriage too, and there’s no prospect of ever being employed again, especially in the professions.

Sound familiar? If so, you might be surprised to realise how often this happens. Mostly it’s in cases from the education sector, although it may happen in any public sector case, for example the NHS. Occasionally, but less often, it happens in private sector cases, and in rare cases from the voluntary sector.

Although there’s never any substantive proof, it seems that all the parties arrayed against you have been colluding in secret. The question is, what allegiance binds these individuals together, and where could they meet such that the normal rules of confidentiality do not apply? What fraternal obligation places their duty to support and protect each other above the moral, ethical and legal obligations by which the rest of us are bound?

Employers, unions, law firms, and employees of the justice system are part of society, and every group, professional or otherwise, contains a few poor performers and rotten apples. This ranges from inexperience through ineptitude and incompetence to collusion and corruption.

[/quote]
 

The same truth applies for mobbing, and several other scenarios where individuals, whistle-blowers, etc, try to get justice.

If you are not seeing the bigger picture you might think that you are fighting several separate entities, but you are not, you are fighting the same enemy, with different appendages, but at the end of the day, we are all chasing the same phantom.

It’s a system of control and conformity that we are fighting against.

http://www.TargetedIndividuals.com/System.html

[quote]The system that really exists and that controls society is really made up of the powerful and elite, Corporations and Governments. The powerful elite, do not care who is in government, because they will always have the primary say with how things go, and what the final outcome is. The same has become true for corporations, and powerful interests. Then there is the will of the government, the body that appears to be elected by the people, but who is there to really serve the will of these powerful interests.

To keep the system in place and running smoothly, there are appendages that are set in place to teach the population how to act, think, behave, and yes how to conform to the system. The system wants people to come up thinking that they are completely free and can act, think, and feel however they choose to. This is true to an extent, as long as your interest do not run too contrary to what the system has in mind. Once your interest start to run contrary, or you do something to step out of what the system considers acceptable boundaries, that is when you enter the Targeted Individual zone.
[/quote]
 
What do the above elements all have in common. They all lead back to the same source and they all paint a similar picture. A government that is run by corrupt elements. Corrupted elements Who will do what it takes to protect the system they have in place.

The more alarming picture that many of us are waking up to, is the fact that they have the ability to do this.

In my research, and Mark. M. Rich’s research, we both realised that they have an army of citizen informants. Some of these people are just average people like yourselves, who probably have no idea that there is a bigger picture happening. A lot of others are people that the government feel that they own or can control, and can manipulate. Homeless people, street kids, the poor that they have forced into this.

We can look for phantoms all we want, but at the end of the day, it’s the same strings being pulled. What the main stream media, which is controlled by governments and corporations does, is it tries to paint people who try to bring these discoveries to light as insane, or paranoid, or try to make it seem that these things do not exist, and if evidence does present itself, they try to make it seem that it’s being done by anyone else but the actual source.

When evidence is too great and the system can no longer hide the truth, they still find ways to protect themselves, and society instead of demanding change, adjust to the new reality, and it continues. I have spoken about this before, I saw a documentary that talked about the church and the priest and the documentary said, that after the exposure, the laws in Rome were changed, which now make it harder to prosecute these priests. The system again protected itself.

So wither it’s exposure of the CIA running drugs, or mind control, if it does get out to the main stream, there is usually a period of shock and awe, and then the controls that are in place, move in very quickly to squash it’s sources of opposition.

The threat passes, the knowledge becomes a part of society, and that’s it.

How did it all become so corrupt? Like attracts like. In every institution, in every country there have been increased reports of bullying, and mobbing, etc. The ones being targeted fit a specific profile, and they are the ones who get pushed out of the system.

http://targetedindividuals.com/Forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=8

What we also see happening, is that the ones doing the targeting are the ones to be advanced, the bully get’s a promotion, the accused pedophile becomes governor, etc. We see the corrupt elements in these stories advancing, and their victims or targets, often being eliminated or left without means.

A system like this under these conditions can become corrupt very fast. Corrupt elements are protected because they have something to hind and so they protect each other.

Others believe that protection of these elements is necessary to protect society and so they go along with what they know to be wrong.

Other are scared, they have seen what the system can do. They see it happen to whistle-blowers, journalist that do controversial stories, lawyers that go up against the system.

Others over time have learnt this is the way things are, and they just comply.

Others are just unaware of the real mechanisms in place, and would be shocked and disgusted, but when they try to do something about it, they find that there is no one there to help.

I think change is possible, but only if we truly wake up and realise that something is wrong. We are living in a corrupt society, with some very wrong elements. Elements in many cases that go up the top of the chain. Elements that protect and look out for each other.

Elements that know how to and which continue to manipulate, scare, and subdue people in to complacency.

If you try to see the bigger picture, or are not familiar with conspiracies, it will be hard to take. Two years ago, I didn’t want to see or believe that there could be any correlation between the abductee community and gang stalking. I thought my government were the best and that it was just a matter of bringing this to the attention of the right person in government. I now realise that this is not the case, because this is the source. I thought I lived in a democratic society, but I realise that democracy is not what I first thought it is.

I realise this system is also moving towards a one world government, and until we find some way united to see the bigger picture and act on it, things will not change. How can they if people do not realise that there is a need for change, and once they realise this, they have to begin to understand the true structure that they are up against.

For now it  was just important to bring these elements all together in one place so we could have a better understanding of what we are dealing with.

September 29, 2008 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Gang Stalking, Sexual Assult, E-harassment

The next thing I wanted to talk about was an Interview Greg Syzmanski did with Ramona Lopez. The interview is from a couple of years ago.

She was a regular mom who saw kids in her community doing drugs. She wanted to help these kids, so she started with some others in the community to help try to get the drugs stopped.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b59_1194549634

What happened to her was a nightmare. Along the way of trying to stop drugs, she learnt that the officials in the community were actually trying to push drugs on the kids. There she was trying to get the kids off drugs, and the police and others were trying to keep them on drugs.

Well she started to make this known and that is when the trouble started. Her and her friends started to get set up, several of the woman who had tried to help her were set up with narcotics, arrested and placed in jail. She herself was almost set up, but she had tapped the conversation.

She was gang stalked, she actually walked into one of the community policing meetings where they were trying to set her up and demonise her. They didn’t realise that she was the one that they were going to be following around, so they spoke openly about her, saying things that were not true. When they realised it was her, they stopped talking at the meeting.
Her family would later be harassed, they started to electronically harass her, she was drugged with needles, she was gang raped in her home, when she went to file a report about it, they did not want to perform a rape kit, when she reported it to the police, the report when no place. She was constantly stopped by the police, demonised, she even eventually lost her home because of the harassment.

They used everything to silence her and the rest of the people that had tried to help these kids. What she discovered is what many others have discovered, the authorities in these areas were the ones trying to push drugs on the kids.

She also when she went to the doctor found that she had been chipped. She has x-rays of this, and other documentation.

She awoke in the middle of the night on more than one occasion when they were in her home, thinking they had her in a drug like state, she could hear them talking above her. (The scene she described reminds me a lot of what some of the abducties have said about waking up, with people around them. I do think there is a tie in to these scenarios.) She talks about how they can make you pass out. What she is referring to by this is how the electronic pulses can put you to sleep, many targets including myself have experienced this. We will be fully awake and if we are not cognizant of the electronic harassment beginning, we will just fall asleep and awake later. Your energy is just zapped, and you just fall asleep, as if you have no energy. Kind of like a small child being instantly rocked to sleep.

She was still being stalked and harassed, they had gone after her family. She is very credible when you listen to her, and there was no reason for the government to do this to this woman, but they did. The drugs in the community never stopped and she became just one more target of the state, who stumbled upon the truth and was silenced for it.

Please take the time to listen to the full audio interview of what they did to this woman.

September 28, 2008 Posted by | Community harassment, Corruption, crazy, Drugs, Police Abuse, Police Corruption, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments