Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Psychiatric Reprisal

The Psychiatric Reprisal

What it is

This was a practice first identified as being used in the former Soviet Union. Targets of this practice were misdiagnosed as mentally ill, many were placed in state run psychiatric facilities.

Thousands upon thousands of individuals were targeted and systemically eliminated this way before the practice was brought to light and drew international attention.

The primary targets of this practice were dissidents, activists, those who tried to exercise their rights, or who wrote or published items that the state did not approve of. Those practicing freedom of religion. Also those who practiced minority or ethnic rights.

The practice was brought to the attention of the United Nations in 1969, and brought some condemnation in 1974, but this did little to change what was happening. The practice continued. It was only in 1991 when change was happening on the world stage, that the issue was again examined in more depth and the practice seems to have diminished.

Russia is not the only country to have used this practice. The practice was also heavily used in China as well. They also used this as a way of dealing with political dissidence.

What was interesting about the research into this practice is the idea that a whole field of professionals can become corrupted and misguided in their views. Believing that any form of dissidence is a mental illness.

She could not sleep that night, and became increasingly worried during subsequent months as more instructions from Moscow appeared on her desk. They were unusual, and what was worse, they confirmed her fears of that very first night: The author, Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, was not normal. Actually, he was ill, clearly suffering from what was widely known in Soviet psychiatry as “sluggish schizophrenia.” And indeed, Gorbachev had all the symptoms: struggle for the truth, perseverance, reformist ideas, and willingness to go against the grain. My interlocutor continued to believe in her diagnosis until the Soviet Union collapsed and the windows to the world were opened wide. Only then did she realize that her concept of mental illness, shared by virtually all the approxi-mately 45,000 Soviet psychiatrists, was what was abnormal and that Gorbachev had been normal all along.

2

What is frightening is the realization of how indoctrinated these health professionals were. That they so implicitly believed the propaganda of what the state taught them to, and were willing to turn this indoctrination on innocent citizens. Just like some of the Nazi’s in Germany, many were following what they had been told or taught to do.

The overwhelming multitude of Soviet psychiatrists either had never participated in the political abuse of psychiatry, had tried to avoid being trapped by authorities into taking part, or had no idea that they were hospitalizing people who according to international standards were in perfect mental health—if such a thing exists. They followed thee criteria that they had been taught by a monopolized psychiatric educational system that was dominated by the Moscow School headed by Professor Snezhnevsky. They had been cut off from international psychiatry and had no knowledge of what their colleagues in the outside, “bourgeois” world believed. If any information trickled through, it was immediately seen as an offspring of degenerated bourgeois societies.

2

Many times we like to view these individuals as evil. Denizens of the state who cruelly and unconscionably tortured and falsely inprisioned innocent citizens, but what history is repeatedly showing time and again is that things are often not the cut and dried. These psychiatrist in many cases apparently did not realise the evil that they were doing. They in many cases were following a criteria, a set of standards laid out for them, by a governing body, and anyone who fell into specific criterias, were automatically labelled mentally ill.

They were part of a society in which private initiative, independent thinking, and going against the grain were, at the least, considered dangerous and were often branded criminal. They were part of a society that was taught that anybody who was different, both in thought and in appearance, was “not normal” and thereby almost inherently was “antisocial” and “antisocialist.” When combined with the theories of “sluggish schizophrenia,” this training made it very easy to convince rankand-file psychiatrists, who had only a Soviet education and no access to world psychiatry, that any person who went against the Communist Party and was willing to risk the happiness of both his family and himself had to be mentally ill.

2

These professional had a limited lens by which to judge, and so they went with what they had been taught, they followed the guidelines without question, and placed people into categories based on predetermined criterias. Could the same pattern be re-emerging in other societies? Could these same patterns be happening in democratic countries? Could health professionals also be following a set of criteria, and misdiagnosing perfectly healthy individuals as mentally unwell, schizophrenic, without having ever met them face to face, based solely on predetermined criteria?

Dissidents were held for observation in the fourth (“political”) department, and in most cases mental illness was the eventual diagnosis—almost invariably accompanied by a diagnosis of “sluggish schizophrenia.” When the investigative commission reviewed the files, the retired psychiatrist recognized many names under the diagnoses: former colleagues, sometimes friends, known to her as good professionals. The diagnoses were composed as though she had written them herself: the same style, the same terminology, and probably the same conclusions. Yet when the commission subsequently examined the 60 former victims in person, she was shocked, devastated.

2

What is really scary is how these diagnosis were handed out and delivered. By her own admission this psychiatrist would likely have put many of these individuals away, yet in person they still remained healthy fully functioning individuals, even after years of surviving the Soviet hell that they were put through.

As I said earlier, after the fall of the Soviet regime we found that the truth about Soviet psychiatry was even more horrific than we had imagined. The political abuse of psychiatry was only the tip of the iceberg. The Soviet regime had ostracized any person who was not productive, who did not fulfill the image of the healthy socialist person laboring for the common good—the radiant communist future.

2

Could these same criteria be slowly getting implemented in many democratic societies? Could this same agenda be making it’s way to the west? Will the citizens of the western world soon experience what their counter parts in the former Soviet Union did? A systemic abuse of power that targets 1 in 3 political prisoners?. A practice that touched possibly millions of innocent lives?

Approximately one in three political prisoners were held in psychiatric hospitals rather than in camps and prisons. Yet, the thousands of victims of these political abuses form only the tip of the iceberg of millions of Soviet citizens who fell victim to totalitarian Soviet psychiatry.

2

The American Psychiatric Association is said to be writing it’s soon to be updated version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and the criteria for mental illness might surprise some individuals.

May 27, 2010 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Blacklisted, Conformity, Conspiracy, Controlled society, crazy, dissident, Gang Stalking, Laws | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Killing us softly

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/7564581/Barack-Obama-orders-killing-of-US-cleric-Anwar-al-Awlaki.html

[quote]
Barack Obama orders killing of US cleric Anwar al-Awlaki
Barack Obama’s administration has authorised the assassination of the radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, a rare move against an American citizen.[/quote]

[quote]
The decision to add him to the US hit list required a National Security Council review because of his citizenship.[/quote]

This story received a great deal of attention on forums and blogs, people seem to get it. The fact that you can not just label someone an enemy and then go out and have them killed, there is such a thing as due process. The constitution allows a fair trial.

In this case they get it, that there is something wrong with the killing of Americans in this manner. They realise that today it could be this guy, but tomorrow it could be them, if the government says that they are enemies, or flags them as such.

What they fail to understand is that within their cities, town, centers etc, is that people are being flagged. Innocent people are being flagged, placed on lists, and systemically destroyed. The deaths are not as immediate in many cases as they would be in the story above, but it’s the same concept. Without due process, without a trial, without notification, many of us have been targeted, flagged without ever knowing why if you will, and are being slowly systemically destroyed because the government has told you that we are bad, crazy, or into drugs, or something bad for the community, when in reality many that are being targeted are being targeted for other reasons.

Many understand why the killing of any Americans is wrong, because today it’s this guy, tomorrow it could be them. But when it comes to Gang Stalking, they fail to understand that it’s the same thing. Today it’s us, tomorrow it will be you, and once listed and flagged, no one will question it, the same way many of you are not asking questions about those that you are following around and targeting. About those being listed by the government.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/04/psychiatrists-say-that-being-angry-is-a-mental-illness/

[quote]Proposed updates to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) are prompting many to question whether or not the psychiatric profession itself has gone crazy. The latest additions to the alleged “mentally ill” could include hoarders, people who get angry every now and again, lazy people, and even those who get outraged over things like sex and violence on television.[/quote]

Also the ones that they are clearing out now, are the outspoken, whistle-blowers, intelligent, people who will stand up for things. Once this cleansing happenings, it will be far easier to get the others that to fall into line, and you will be the one’s to help accomplish this with this network that is now so nicely in place. This network that targets have been trying to warn about, which many of you already knew about, but believe is for your own good. Believe that it’s the states way of protecting you.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1205738832/0

[quote]She describes them as “generally very highly intelligent people…” She says that the people her organization deals with “represent a wide range [of] every type of profession you can imagine.”

The women who are singled out tend to be independent, intelligent, & confident professionals. “There’s a heavy predominance of those types of woman in the TI community,” affirmed McKinney. Men are in a smaller proportion, & tend to be non-conformists. They usually have a “sense of self-esteem and pride that seems to invite targeting.” Remember, the MfS was a criminal federal police force that deliberately singled out people exactly like this on a massive scale.

Others that have been targeted include:

Those who have had a bad breakup with an ex-spouse who has influence
Criminals (This program may have begun targeting only criminals)
Those who have reported a crime where the perpetrator was a member of an organized crime ring
Landowners targeted by government or industry for land seizures
Gays, minorities
Inventors awaiting a large payoff
Mentally disabled
Those who have had arguments with neighbors who have connections
Those awaiting a large insurance claim
Convenient targets of opportunity
Those with special talents or abilities
Group members who act in unacceptable ways
Independent freethinkers who are not part of the herd
Those who are perceived as vulnerable or weak
Those opposing the New World Order

The pattern that is unfolding indicates that many targets are people who tend to be emotionally developed, self-confident, independent, free thinkers, artistic, people who don’t need the approval of others, & those not prone to corruption. They’re people who don’t need to be part of a group to feel secure-generally people who are not part of the herd. The financial elite throughout history have consistently hated these individuals. There’s one other type of person that the financial elite hate-truth tellers. They absolutely hate them. This is apparently why whistleblowers are targeted.[/quote]

By the time this system is finished it will cleanse and remove all that do not agree with it and all those who will not go along with it. That means when it’s your turn there will already be a network in place, primed, willing and able to target those who the state wants to eliminate. The network is connected, as most targets have described trying to move from country to country only to have the flagging or designation follow them. The silence of this program will almost silence anyone who is a part of this program, cause you will not be able to say anything about it even if you are targeted by it.

Ofcouse you feel good and righteous about it now, it’s cleaning the homeless, drug users, molesters, crazy people, people that are not good for society. You are putting them in jails, institutions, driving them from job to job, community to community, causing them death, or driving them to suicide, cause the state said it was ok to. You feel like you are doing something good, oh and you are, you are helping the NWO create it’s army of foot soldiers who will tomorrow be used in the same way. Today you target individuals without question, cause the state told you to. Many of us having no idea why, many of us are innocent. Tomorrow when someone get’s angry over the economy, health care, government mishandling, and those new DSM terms kick in, try speaking up, and out then. Then it will be your turn to be labelled, flagged, followed, and the network won’t question it anymore than they question following us around.

You understand why listing someone without trial, or the right to defend themselves is wrong, many seem to grasp the future implications and long term consequences, but when it comes to Gang Stalking, many are failing to bridge the gap, to understand the equal significance of what this will mean to them.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/04/big-brother-pre-crime-quiz-used-on-children/

[quote]The British government plans to collect lifelong records on all residents starting at the age of five, in order to screen for those who might be more likely to commit crimes in the future.

In a plan being piloted by Lincolnshire Community Health Services, all parents of children starting school are being sent an 83-question survey that asks detailed questions about their lives and their children’s behavior.

“This is incredibly intrusive and asks questions which, quite frankly, Lincolnshire Community Health Services do not need to know and have no right knowing,” said Dylan Sharpe of the group Big Brother Watch. “Even worse, the NHS Trust has failed to make it clear that this is a voluntary questionnaire. I would advise any parent receiving this to stick it straight in the bin.”[/quote]

The future is coming, but by bit it is unfolding. They are in every aspect of people’s lives, from the time your kids are born, they want to visit your home, monitor how your kids eat, play act, before they go to school, and once in school, then they want to see which ones need to be medicated, which ones might be more likely to commit crimes? Independent thought will be conditioned away, if not brutally bullied out. A generation of fully biddable, controllable citizens will be raised up.

The internet freedoms we enjoy are slowly being removed, in many cases without a gasp or a whimper.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/04/digital-economy-bill-rushed-through-wash-up-in-late-night-session/

[quote]Government drops clause on orphan works but inserts amendment criticised as over-broad which could block sites based on ‘intent’[/quote]

From Australia to the U.K., and many other parts of Europe, the government wants to tell you which sites are ok for you to visit and see and which sites are not. They have not yet been able to destroy net neutrality, so they are going at it in this angle, and the conditioned people sit back and slowly take it.

People are waking up, that’s great, but if you wake up, see what is happening in from of you and do nothing about it, well you might just as well have stayed asleep.

I don’t like violence like many people, I have been trying to think of what can be done, to fight this, but in the watered-down civil ways that we have all now been conditioned to think. In times past, people turned to civil disobedience. They just refused to ride at the back of the bus, or whatever public action they did not agree with. Greece recently had strikes, which shut the city down. There is a small window before all escape routes are closed off, I think people have to start to use it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/apr/08/internet-piracy-bill

[quote]Internet provider defies digital bill

TalkTalk’s refusal to cooperate with ‘draconian’ anti-piracy measures reflect growing resistance to the digital economy bill[/quote]

I think this is the perfect example of what people, companies, communities can do, should do, and must do to reclaim what is theirs.

Also with the scanners at the airports, many people disagree with it, but are still going along with it, then it will be at libraries, stadiums, etc. Stop it at the airports, file lawsuits, protests, or just don’t go through, but these are the only ways that things will change. The other option ofcourse it to be overwhelmed, retreat into ones self and do nothing.

We each have to try to take individual action to do what we can. I am doing what I can to help targets like myself that are on these charming lists, where we are being systemically destroyed, ironically enough by our fellow citizens, in the communities that we might actually be able to do some good in.

The system works because we let it work, if it actually stops working for us, when we are out of accord with it, and what it does, then and only then will change happen. Till the it will continue to squeeze us and squeeze us, killing us softly, but dealing us a deadly blow, no less fatal than the order to kill Anwar al-Awlaki.

April 11, 2010 Posted by | Children, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Community harassment, community mobbing, community policing, Conspiracy, control, Controlled society, crazy, Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bus Beheading

So many things to blog. I have been neglecting this story for some time, so here are some quick thoughts.

One about the bus beheading. Tell me if you have heard this before. An event happens the public panics, they agree immediately to have all their rights suspended and agree to draconian tactics they would never have agreed to.

Let’s see, mental detectors, cameras, you can no longer put your stuff on the overheads, and you get patted down? Do I understand this correctly. Greyhound buses have been in existence for years, this was one incident out of how many years of safe travel, and yet all rights previously enjoyed are gone. Remember these changes come after a two year study for greyhound security, and without this incident, do you think people would have willingly submitted to the changes?

http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/547876

[quote] Starting this week, Greyhound passengers in Edmonton, Winnipeg and Calgary are being swept before boarding by hand-held metal detectors.

Passengers are also now required to store their luggage in the cargo hold instead of bringing it onboard, except for small personal items such as purses.

The new measures – which will also follow in other cities – come four months after a young man was stabbed and beheaded onboard a Greyhound bus near Portage la Prairie, Man.

Greyhound spokeswoman Abby Wambaugh says the extra security isn’t because of what happened, but stems from a companywide review that began in 2006.[/quote]

It’s almost too easy to get people to give up their rights without question. But those who give up liberty for a false sense of security shall in the end have neither. The irony of it all.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2009/02/23/8499461-cp.html

[quote]The company is now beefing up security measures, including cameras, global positioning units and a panic button that immediately dispatches police to a bus’s location. Drivers are also getting more training in self-defence and conflict resolution.[/quote]

I know after 9/11 they were trying to find a reason to implement similar changes, but people didn’t agree, scare them a little bit, and viola, they will come to you. It’s classic, and from what I can see it works every time. Problem, horrific incident, reaction, solution, already waiting to be rolled out.

http://www.flixster.com/forums/topic/771141030

The bus beading is something I have never had the time to research properly. There were mentions early on that with his history of mental illness, he might have been a good manchurian candidate, but proving it, is another story. People should be looking into this, but they don’t.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090303/national/bus_beheading_trial
[quote]He didn’t have many friends and was divorced in 2006. Li had “mental problems,” according to those who knew him, but they had not known him to be violent.

His former wife said he used to be gone for long periods of time, took unexplained bus trips and sometimes rambled. He was hospitalized briefly but never sought medical attention. [/quote]

Was he really completely crazy or was something else going on?

Well we now know why he switched seats after the smoke break, but was there a trigger word? Was he really crazy or being controlled? It’s impossible not to speculate when you have an awareness of the history of Canadian mind control experiments, and new technology that might be capable of communicating with a controlled target remotely.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2009/03/03/8608416-cp.html

[quote]The voice told Vince Li to get on the bus and sit next to Tim McLean, Dr. Stanley Yaren told Li’s second-degree murder trial Tuesday.

“A voice from God told him Mr. McLean was a force of evil and was about to execute him,” Yaren, a witness for the Crown, told the judge hearing the case.

Li, 40, believed he had to act quickly to protect himself, Yaren said. [/quote]

Tim Mclean the perfect victim. Was he really a random victim? Was his being on the bus and intersecting with Li random, or preplanned. Yeah that get’s into the conspiracy files, but if the questions are not asked, the answers will not surface. Now Li says he thought Tim was a demon?

I believe there is much more to this story, but in the minds of the scared public, the right questions often never get asked, the helpless scared society look to the state for solutions, which usually involve taking away their rights and freedoms, it’s perceived to have been done voluntary, and all the focus shifts to the justice system, and not the possibility of much darker, and much more deliberate forces. In the end, if you don’t look out for your own rights and freedoms, no one else will, and if you agree to so easily give them away, then at the end of the day, maybe your fate is well met.

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin.

March 11, 2009 Posted by | Awareness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Under Siege?

Well another article has come out it’s called What’s Behind Internet Conspiracy Empires?

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/story?id=6443988&page=1

Dec. 12, 2008—

The article much like the last few articles wonders what the impact is that Gang Stalking Websites, more specifically Gang Stalking World, because let’s face it there are only a few websites in the community that discuss what is actually happening.

[quote]
A man standing on a street corner with a sign reading “the lizard people rule you all,” or, “my neighbors are spying on me for the government” isn’t likely to get many supporters.

But give that man a Web site template, or let him produce some slick videos on YouTube and, lo and behold, he may have thousands of people across the world supporting him.

Such is the story of several extraordinarily popular conspiracy theorists and theories online today.

Take the victims of gang stalking — a subculture of people who think their friends and neighbors are all secret government spies ready to turn them over to the authorities. The movement has recently spawned gang stalking support groups, forums and advice Web sites.
[/quote]
The article is not unexpected. Ever since I saw the article a few months ago about Truman Show Delusion, I expected similar articles. I did not expect them to specifically hone in on the Gang Stalking Websites so soon, but you knew it was coming.

So in anticipation of this, I wanted to give people a chance to discuss some of the things that have been happening to us. If they are truly interested in discussing Gang Stalking and Researching it, you can do so here.

http://www.GangStalkingUnited.com/forum

Because of programs like Cointelpro and their ability to wipe out movements, we have learnt that it’s very possible to cover up things that are happening, demonize movements, or get rid of people that are not within their control. You can discuss the topic as long as they control what is being said about it. 

What I see happening with Gang Stalking is that we have some real targets being removed from the scene, I blogged about this recently. I also see that we have many websites and blogs, but many in my opinion are not by genuine targets. Based on what we know about Cointelpro and other programs of that nature, we know that these programs have a habit of removing legit groups and starting up their own, this way they are in control of what is happening, what gets said, and what progress the movement makes.

I have often said that out of 10 websites you would be lucky to find one that is legitimate, that still holds true.

I have also suggested that you request your F.O.I.A. freedom of information act request, but please avoid people online that would get you to compose outlandish letters that will spawn the concern of “mental health experts”.

The other problem is that activists and dissidents of other groups that are being spied upon, are getting some attention and concern, where Gang Stalking targets seem to still be very marginalized. We can not show reason to believe that we are being targeted, but our claims even with all the research are still being put off into the conspiracy zone. I am wondering if any activist in the community, who are parts of other activist programs have had any luck with getting assistance from outside communities?

Eg. Have you joined or are you a part of a peace movement that is under surveillance? I am wondering if targets in this situation have had any luck with gaining assistance from an outside source as a target of surveillance rather than Gang Stalking because they belong to a peace movement?

Anyways it’s an interesting article. If this is just the new buzz word then that’s great. If it’s not the new buzz word, then we will see attempts by health experts to show that these sites are harmful. We might even get examples of this.

This article completely left out mentions of the Mind Control websites and went straight for Gang Stalking, and specifically Gang Stalking World.

It’s something to be aware of. The information on Gang Stalking World has been free to be shared, and backed up for sometime now. I suggest that you share the information, and if you have the space, make a copy of the website.

If we do not learn from history, we will be sure to repeat it. We might repeat it anyways, but at least we learnt.

December 12, 2008 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Cointelpro | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment