Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

MJ the real

Now that Michael Jackson is gone I still have questions.

The Michael Jackson situation has always bothered me. I was never fully convinced about the pedophile charges.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvhwWDCV9Bo

The second case I saw coming a mile away. After I saw the interview that Micheal did, where a UK journalist followed him around with a camera, after I saw the portion of the interview with a boy in the interview I was concerned, and felt very strongly that a false accusation would come up once again.

When the second accusation came up some time later, and the identity was reveled to be the boy in the interview, I felt that that my prediction had been accurate, and I felt strongly that this accusation as I had predicted and could be false. I feel I had seen it coming a mile away, what’s odd is that Micheal Jackson had not.

Jackson seems to have held on to a very peter pan existence for as long as he could. He seemed to have been very child like. It’s like he really didn’t get how cold, and cruel this world could be.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/06/26/2009-06-26_the_stain_of_kidsex_raps_plagued_career_weird_sleepovers_with_boys_huge_payouts_.html
For the second accusation, I strongly believe it was a s false accusation, but what about the first case?

I did not follow it as closely as I could have, and in the following years I have never researched it. The things that had bothered me about the case however are as follow.

He paid out money, why would you pay out money if you are innocent? I thought that innocent people would not do this, but in time, since doing research, I find that this is not always the case. I have now seen Gang Stalking targets admit to being drug users, in order to get their child back from the state.

At the time that this happened, I could not believe that a child would make an accusation like that unless it was true? In time I have now seen groups of people accused by children who were coached be accused of being pedophiles, only to have it come out years later that the children were coached.

I don’t know if this could have been the case here, there was other disturbing details. It has been said that the child knew details of a birth mark that was on Micheal’s lower anatomy. This is worrisome, and again makes me wonder what happened?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1195825/Humiliation-dark-obsession-children–stain-lingering-Michael-Jacksons-legacy.html

I don’t think any adult should be around a child that is not there’s in any capacity that exposes such details, be it going to the bathroom with them in the room or other. The rules might vary with very close relatives, who are also like parental figures, or care givers.

This has always worried me about the case. However Micheal spent years befriending kids like Macaulay Culkin and there was never an accusation, at least not that I am aware of.
I believe he paid off the first case to make it go away, guilty or innocent, he could not handle what was happening, I think the accusation tore at his soul. I do now understand it’s very possible to frame someone to make it seems as if they are a pedophile, some of the men in the Targeted Individual community face this fact.

I believe the trial changed him. I think we saw a lot of the in subsequent years manifest itself in his outward appearance and weirdness.

There is no doubt that he became eccentric. He married Lisa Marie in later years. I have personally always believed it was to help restore his image after the trial. That doesn’t make it a bad thing. Lisa Marie insists that it was a real marriage, but I sort of don’t fully believe that.

His second wife Debbie later in trial, claims that the two children of their union were artificially inseminated, and that there were not his biologically. I sort of believe her, which also means they too most likely did not have normal marital relations.

The baby swinging incident was just bad judgement. What was he thinking? I think the incident just further shows me he shows poor taste, and bad judgement. He was so intense on the fans, that he really made a bad call. It’s something someone much younger with bad judgement might have done, and it did not help his case.

Since his death I have found a lot of good information. You can learn a lot from some of these websites. The articles that I found of interest was one that was going over details of the first trial. I will post the link.

http://www.usnewslink.com/framedjackson.htm

How should he be remembered? In my mind there are so many unanswered questions? Was he really a pedophile, or were the accusations baseless, and was it just people taking advantage of his childlike nature? Was there some truth to the rumour? Was it just groundless?

I think Jackson had a very unreal sense of what the world should be like, vs what it was. He believe that there was nothing wrong with having kids over, and even having them stay over in his room. It could be completely innocent, but if you are a 40 something, unmarried, eccentric, people are going to wonder at the best of times, and at the worst of times they will swallow anything that is thrown at them.

I am going to withhold judgement, because I have never felt that I had all the pieces of the puzzle. I do know that if he really was not a pedophile, we have done him a great injustice. I see the comments, and they are like nails. They are pretty terrible, and if he was not a pervert, then what a horrible way to be remembered, and have your name destroyed, especially if he was innocent.

If he was a pervert in anyway, then he does not deserve the adoration that he is getting. He was talented there is no doubt about that, but talent does not excuse bad behaviour, it did not with Jerry Lee Lewis, and it should not with people like R. Kelly when there is clear evidence for the case.

With Jackson the lines and some of the lies are very blurry. He was weird toward the end, but I think he was childlike, maybe more than we know. I do think that there could be more ongoing than most ever dreamed. I am learning more in the last 48 hrs about rumours, of conspiracy against him, and what he felt was ongoing in this regard, than I have in the last 15 years or so. It’s been interested.

What I do know, I owe it to myself to try to learn the truth, no matter what it is. I now know that this world can make you look, appear or seem to be anything that it wants you to be, for good or for bad. I know that there are some leech like parasites in the world who will take advantage of and feed off, those unsuspecting, childlike types. There are many who will feed off of the innocent, and take the most innocent comment, action, gesture, sentiment, out of context and make it into something that it is not.

Since his death a lot of this has been confirmed, by his ex-wife Lisa Marie, when she talks about some of the constant leeches around him, and how she tried to save him from self destructive behaviour and those around him who did not have his best intentions at heart.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/090626/entertainment/centertainment_us_jackson_lisamarie

[quote]Presley wrote that she and Jackson’s family tried to save him from “the inevitable, which is what just happened” but she became overwhelmed and had to end their relationship.

“I became very ill and emotionally/ spiritually exhausted in my quest to save him from certain self-destructive behavior and from the awful vampires and leeches he would always manage to magnetize around him,” she wrote.[/quote]

Then we are hearing more about the people around him, who might have given him bad advise, and also about the drugs, someone was saying that compared to the Anna Nicole situation, hers was nothing compared to this, and the leeches around him.
http://www.showbizspy.com/article/188369/michael-jackson-died-of-drugs-overdose

[quote]Brian Oxman, the Jackson family attorney, told CNN that the superstar had a very serious problem with prescription medication, and that the people that were surrounding him were enablers. “If you think the case with Anna Nicole Smith was an abuse, it’s nothing in comparison to what we have seen taking place in Michael Jackson’s life.”[/quote]

What a shock. He seems to have had a lot of these types in his life.

http://www.kansascity.com/stargazing/story/1282600.html
So for me, it’s a matter of discovering the truth. I want to know the truth for the three kids that he was raising. If he was not a pervert or a pedophile, then we deserve to know the truth, and if he was, then that needs to be made clear as well. Paying out money does not unequivocally mean that one is guilty. Being weird and eccentric also does not equate guilt.

I would like to know the truth one way or another. If he is innocent, then the world did him a great injustice, and the least we could do is clear his name. If he is guilty then the adoration is misplaced and disgraceful. Truth is sometimes somewhere in the middle.

Anyways for the time being I do wish is soul peace, his kids and family the best, and I wish the world truth, since they are often more willing to swallow lies.

June 27, 2009 Posted by | black, Celebrity, Children, Drugs, Gang Stalking, male, Music, Popstar | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The gangstalking File

The case against me and what I understand of it.
The gangstalking file.
http://www.workplacebullying.org/2009/05/14/uk-green2/

[quote]The largest part of the award is the £640,000 awarded for future loss of earnings and a pension, and it is this portion which marks the case out as unusual.

“We have seen cases like this before a number of times but the court has awarded such a large amount because it took the view that this person would not be able to work at this salary level for a long time in the future,” said Tom Potbury, a lawyer specialising in employment law at Pinsent Masons.

Green, 36, had said she was subjected to “offensive, abusive, intimidating, denigrating, bullying, humiliating, patronizing, infantile and insulting words and behavior” and subjected to crude and lewd comments from her former colleagues. Her colleagues would move her papers, hide her post and remove her from document circulation lists. She alleged that some of the colleagues had ignored and excluded her, that her personal and professional authority was undermined, and her workload increased to unreasonable and arbitrary levels.

Her lawyer said medical experts on both sides of the case agreed that Green developed a major depressive disorder, but there was disagreement about its cause.

Deutsche Bank said it had not breached its duties to Green and denied that she was bullied, saying she had had a predisposition to mental illness. Deutsche Bank paid for stress counselling and assertiveness training for Green but she had a nervous breakdown before returning to work and suffering a relapse.[/quote]
I have read the above case scenario several times. It’s funny because the workplace mobbing that I encountered was very similar in some regards to some of the things that went on in this case. Instead of being on the winning end of a lawsuit, I am on this end of an investigation, which is being used to falsely used to portray me as mentally ill.

It’s funny, someone is dehumanized and degraded for several years and they no longer wish to put up with it, or emotionally can not, and the employer in this case a bank wants to place all the blame on them.

Part of what I have been trying to do is better understand the mechanisms used to place me under this investigation. One that has continued for years.

What’s happening to me goes back a really long time. As mentioned before, I first became aware of the actual Gang Stalking, about three years ago, but my workplace mobbing had gone on for several years before this.

At work I was in a similar situation where workplace mobbing was daily, it was continuous and it made it impossible for me to perform my job functions. I eventually filed a complaint with the human rights commission after trying to work things out with Human Resources.

Shortly after filing the complaint C. Coughlin from HR called me into the office, in the presence of my senior manager at the time and advised me that if I did not drop the complaint, I would be required to see a Dr Brown. If I however dropped the complaint, things would back to normal. This play was disgraceful, and dirty but not uncommon.

Apparently if you decide to stand up for your rights or blow the whistle you need to speak to someone, if you instead choose option b and drop the case against them, you are of sound mind and body. Fascinating how these companies work. They use these investigations to discredit and disenfranchise their enemies. They destroy people’s lives to protect their own interests. That’s the true purpose of human resources in these companies.
The harassment I was exposed to included slander, lies, derogatory comments, rumors, and a stimuli which was anchored to said rumour. The stimuli was what was used for the bulk of the harassment.  Because I complained primarily about the stimuli, they used this to try to portray me as mentally ill.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1144462/Man-jailed-harrassing-elderly-neighbours-whistling-Addams-Family-theme-time-saw-them.html
[quote]
Leopold Wrobel harassed the pensioners for more than four years, making them feel like prisoners in their home.

His victims, Michael and Kathleen Sharpe, said Wrobel had ‘nearly succeeded’ in destroying their lives.

Wrobel, 51, had been handed an anti-social behaviour order last December for harassing the couple.

But a court heard his nuisance behaviour, which had already lasted for four years, continued on the day the order was imposed.

The court was shown CCTV footage from cameras on the Sharpes’ property, which picked up Wrobel’s repeated whistling when they arrived at or left the house.

Michael Treharne, prosecuting, said each incident taken in isolation would probably seem silly or almost pathetic.
Leopold Wrobel taunted the elderly couple with the Addams Family theme tune

Leopold Wrobel: He taunted the couple

But he added: ‘If something happens on an ongoing basis and goes on and on and on, eventually it reaches the stage of being absolutely intolerable.’

Mr Sharpe, from Wingerworth in Derbyshire, told the court Wrobel’s behaviour had made his wife ill and she had started losing her hair.

‘It’s been devastating and it’s done what he wanted to do, to try to destroy our lives,’ the 68-year-old said. ‘He very nearly succeeded.’

His wife told magistrates they could not leave the house without Wrobel being there. [/quote]
 

This couple was harassed using a stimuli, in this case the Addams family theme. It was one man, against this couple, but he managed to almost ruin their lives. In my case, I was one person, and about 80% of the peope I worked with, including most of the managers were taking part in what was ongoing. I worked with about 130 people at the time.

The very things that I complained about, at the time and filed the human rights complaint about are some of the very things individuals are now winning court cases over currently, yet in my case, it’s being used to portray me as crazy, and keep a fake investigation ongoing.
Part of what I complained about is that a manager, let’s call him “hateman the hitman saw”, who was currently working in the same company that I was, had years earlier at a different company started a derogatory rumour about me. I stated in the complaint that I felt that this rumour had continued onto my current job.

Since I was once again working with this person, I had reasonable grounds to believe that this person was helping to fuel the flames of this degrogatory rumour, once again. I had grounds to believe it, because I heard back that this was the case. The bulk of my complaint focused on the fact that the derogatory rumours/comments had been anchored to a stimuli, and said stimuli was being used on a daily basis to make it impossible for me to perform my job functions.  Eg. If the stimuli had been keys jangling, you would have the people directly around me, jangling keys for the whole shift, on several occasions, I had customers asking me about the noise in the background.

Sounds pretty simple right, not so simple, since the workplace decided to go along with what was happening.

After researching this, what I now know is that the stimuli and my reaction to it were deliberately created. I had worked with someone at the first job who was in the military. He had tried to sensitise me to three stimuli. I didn’t know it at the time, that it was deliberate, but I do now. The other stimuli was pens clicking, and the actual stimuli which I became sensitive to.

What I also now know is that James, and “Hateman The Hitman Saw”, were both part of the snitching friends network. What James did with the anchoring of the stimuli was deliberate. What I don’t know is if he did this on his own accord, or if in fact this was more deliberate than that. James outside of work did have military connections, so I don’t have the answer to this yet.
The other thing that was happening at that time is the same tactic was being used outside of the workplace to harass me in public. I was aware of this, but I was not aware of the snitching friends network.

So what you have is a target that has been deliberately sensitised. A corrupt company that wants to keep the target quite and stop them from going forward with a human rights complaint. I am not saying that this company is the only place an investigation could have originated from, because I have reason to believe that this might have started years before this, but I do believe that they used my complaint to the human rights commission to try to portray me as mentally ill, when really I was being harassed, and any actions I took to protect myself from being harassed day in and day out were fully justified. I will also state that the harassment was happening outside of the workplace, and the same applies.

So the target is aware that they are being harassed and a stimuli is being used. What they do in the course of these investigations is they try to incite and instigate incidents to further the perception of mental illness, or whatever the target is being billed as. If the target is being billed as a racist, they try to encourage negative interactions with persons of different races. If they are being billed as homophobic, they try to encourage negative interactions with people who are homosexual, if the target is being billed as a terrorist, they try to portray the target as such and make their actions look suspicious.

Since I have been targeted, they have tried the mentally ill angle several times and several different ways. I am aware that one incident that happened recently involved my handing out activism material to a group in a small cafe, about 7 people. I decided to try some viral activism, so I very impromptu handed out some papers directing the informants to visit one of the Gang Stalking websites. I mean I get people coming up to me all the time handing me flyer’s for clubs, and other events, or their activism materials so I don’t see the difference. However my understanding is that they are using me handing out what I consider essentially activism material to further the myth of mental illness. Right because naming informants as such and directing them to Gang Stalking websites is insane? Right. I really have to wonder about the shrills that they are using to make these types of assessments and then further disenfranchise targets?

They could in essence use a simple incident such as this and use it to get employers current to flag you. Yet is not activism what I do on a daily basis? Why should my handing out activism material be seen or evaluated any differently than anyone else?

When they can’t prove that you are crazy, the scope of the investigation might shift. It’s what I call a fishing expedition. Remember these investigations are often the life blood for many. The informants get a bit of money, lot’s of men get construction jobs, and they use these investigations to push targets to the edge, hoping that when they do snap, they will have further proof that the informant network is doing a good job. So every time they can put a target in a mental hospital, get them behind bars, to kill themselves or others, or just attack someone, this gives them cause, and in some cases additional funding, so it’s in their best interest to make you look crazy.

Recently what some informants did is that they started a group with a list of people. Many on that list did not ask to be on that list, but they started sending out emails. In those emails they used some racist or other language that might be cause for an investigation. So for example you find yourself a part of this list, which is in effect a group. You don’t say anything wrong, but others in the group do, surprise, you might find yourself being investigated, because you now belong to a group spewing hate speech. The hate speech will ofcourse have been provided by the informants themselves, but what does that matter?

I had another incident where I was in the park. I had put up with 20 minutes of some idiot informant doing stupid dogs tricks while trying to keep an eye on me. Normally if you were not aware of what was happening it would not be that irritating, but it was. I was grateful when the dog boy left, and was just getting comfortable, when yet another informant showed up, this one even worst than the first, because he just stood there and stared. Well I had it, and I just gave him a glaring look before reaching into my case to get something. I had just gotten some groceries and was pretty tired, and just wanted to sit there without being disturbed.

The next thing I know, the little man pansy is running across the park like a bat out of hell, and I am thinking what the heck? I have been known to give some pretty squelching looks, but I didn’t think I was that good. Next thing I know before I leave the park, there is a helicopter that literally accompanied me home on my walk from the park, and for the next two months I would become acquainted with what I call airstalking.

When I got home, the serve your drug sentence as an informant neighbour above me, decided to make contact with the neighbour below. Suddenly all friendly, can I come and hang out? This neighbour had never spoken to me before. All this other stuff and I am thinking what the heck? Apparently I came to find out that, man pansy, who ran out of the park like a bat out of hell, seems to have given them the impression that I had wires in my case, (which I did for an electronic device, I think a battery charger), and therefore maybe a bomb or incendiary device? So upstairs neighbour was just making sure I didn’t blow myself and him up, and the suddenly friendly Susan above me, as I call him, was just trying to get into my apartment to look around. Well that makes sense.

Now what really get’s me here is all it takes is the word of a snitch. They don’t have to be logical, or truthful, they can make up anything. Now to be fair to man pansy, I don’t know if he did it to be spiteful because I gave him a squelching look, or if he really believed I was dangerous, and I really don’t care. These people are told the target is crazy, or what have you, and normal behaviour that would normally never be questioned suddenly becomes oh did you see that, the target blinked, what do I do, what does that mean? They are irrational and dangerous.

The other problem is positive identification. There have been so many times where I know that I was flagged as someone at a location doing xyz, and I was not. If I could see my file, I am sure I would find several incidents that were attributed to me to make me look crazy, and were not in fact me, but the way these investigations work is that you are guilty, and you never get a chance to prove your innocence.

I have seen so many times where they give the signal that I am away from home, which means that they are following someone else somewhere, and this means that if there is an incident, it will be ascribed to me, and it will not be me. I have been on the train and other locations where they have the wrong target, but they are provoking someone else and I have seen the other person react. Yet this will be ascribed to me.

Corrections will never be made, because the target is not allowed any input whatsoever and most of this is based on the word of informants, staged incidents which are designed to make the target look like anything you want them to look like, pedophile, drug dealer, racist, homophone, crazy, you name it, they can stage it.

The other question I have is about the types of psychiatrists or professionals that are being used. Based on what I saw in regards to the articles that they wrote about Gang Stalking online, you have people trying to write a whole entire community off as mentally ill, when in fact these investigations are on going. Then when that does not work, you write them off as extremists or conspiracy theorists. Yet everything that has been stated just about, has been proven, by external sources. If the same types of people are being used to remotely diagnose targets as crazy, we should be very worried.

As it is, they have been investigating me for years. I was never crazy. I was being harassed. Because I choose to stand up for myself and take the company to the commission, HR used it as an opportunity to open an investigation when I failed to comply with the threat of dropping the suit. Since that time, I have been openly harassed, had my communications interfered with, had several staged incidents, some involving me, many not involving me, but all used to further portray me as mentally ill. I have never been allowed to see my file, or directly address any of the said incidents that would be used to portray me as mentally ill.

Normal activity such as handing out activism material has been used to portray me as mentally ill, keep in mind, I have never had anyone tell me that they did not want something being handed to them. So if this is the case, how can an incident be used against me? Further how can said incident be used to further try to disenfranchise me from employment?

What I do know is we have a very corrupt system. Many informants see about 15-30 minutes of skits and harassment that is running in a targets life 24/7. They perform their surveillance. The ones below me, play human target with my body, often using lasers, radar gun, pulse weaponry, what have you to burn my skin from the apartment below. They still try to do the sleep deprivation thing when they can, much of this by a human rights stand point would be considered torture, and against the law.
These people feel that it’s ok to perform such actions on targets that they have been told are mentally ill, or rapists, pedophiles, drug dealers, users, prostitutes etc, because these groups are seen as less than human, they don’t feel that their actions are immoral, or unethical. They think that what they are doing is just fine.

Lastly again these investigations are the life blood of these programs. I had one person tell me that he was offered a construction job. Person had been sent to befriend me. The construction job was to be the benefit. They hire a lot of these people and they put a lot of money into the area around the target where the surveillance is happening and unfortunately these perks makes a targets community more likely to go along with, and take part in the harassment. Remember for the community doing the harassment/surveillance, they are often having the time of their lives, in some cases. They are working together, some feel like they are James Bond, it’s fun for some of them, so fun, that they forget that their is a human being on the other side of the door, as was apparent with the maintenance guy who was so caught up in his role of being informant, that he forgot that the target has rights and the target is not ascribing to their mental pathology.

I have said it before and I will say it again, these people in many cases are not smart, many don’t realise that they are being used to set people up and destroy lives. Lives like Jiverly Wong, Kimveer Gill and many others. When the target kills themselves or shoots others, they see it as proof that the target really was mentally ill, and not proof that their harassment drove the target to the end result. They then feel that they did a good job, that they are valuable and relevant and they continue on as before, feeling more justified than ever.

I also suspect that they have the odd staged incident that also further serves to justify the informant network, and the incidents further serve to make them think that what they are doing is valuable and relevant. When I researched the Stasi, many had been a part of the Stasi by choice and not by force and even after the Stasi fell, they did not see a problem with what they had done. In Hitler’s Germany it was the same as well, with many enjoying a sense of corporation, neighbourliness, not seeing anything wrong or malignant in their actions, they were just following orders, or the laws of the land. It’s the same for our informants.

Thus targets are guilty, we will never be proven innocent because we never get to see our files. The evidence gathered is staged in many cases, normal incidents that would not be questioned if it was done by someone else not under investigation, are being used to further justify their cases against us. When they fail to find proof for one aspect of the investigation, they set up other incidents, go on fishing expeditions and claim the scoop of the investigation has changed. This is used to continue these investigations indefinitely. Remember I recently spent time studying the extremist community, the informants are now trying to set up incidents to portray me as someone that I am not. Think about how this works if you are being investigated as a pedophile. You are likely to get emails containing kiddy porn from you friendly neighbourhood informants, and then the other informant monitoring your internet connection is likely to just focus on the content of that email. Or like the other example that I gave, these groups that you join, or that people add your email to, you have to watch what is being said, because they could use that to change the scope or add to the scope of the investigation.

If you spend anytime reading about how the police are abusing the informant system, then you might begin to have some idea of what we are up against, and then might be able to better protect yourself and others from these deliberate investigations, which have no end, and are continually staged to paint the targets in the worst light, real or imagined.

Is this democracy? No I don’t believe it is, but this system has been like this for some time, and as it spreads more are likely to be affected by it, so it’s very important that people become aware of how the system is operating and functioning so they can try to avoid some of the pit stops associated with it.

June 18, 2009 Posted by | activism, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, community mobbing, Conspiracy, control, Corruption, Covert investigations, East Germany, Entrapment, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, harassment, Informants, Kilmeer Gill, mobbing, Sensitize, society | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Open Secrets

Open Secret. That’s what Gang Stalking is. Many know about what is going on, and many are simply willing to keep the secret. Don’t get me wrong there are people in society who have no idea that the society is like this, but for others it’s a big open secret.

I learnt a lot about open secrets. Sometimes you keep them to protect yourself, mostly you might keep it to protect others, or in some cases to protect an organization or even a society. Other times the secret might be kept because the society, or organization is in denial.

It made me think about why people keep secrets, sometimes it’s to protect another, they worry about the consequences should the secret come out. Others because it might affect the system that supports them. Sometimes it’s to protect themselves, because they kept the secret too long, or they fear the consequences.

I thought about the priest that were doing these deeds to children. Many of these men were prominent, people trusted them, they liked them, looked to them for moral guidance, for a sense of community, for a sense of what made them who they are. To find out what you believed to be true as really false has to be a shock. Denial is a stage that people also go through, to deal with the shock but then also to protect themselves from the truth. They often might not want to hurt the perpetrator, they realise that exposing the perpetrator might bring down their cause, society etc. Like those preachers who had affairs on their wives, when you get caught doing the opposite of what you preach it can be a hard thing.

The actions of others have the capacity to shake foundations, and I think that is in part what is at the heart of the reason many keep quite about things like this in society. They don’t want to rock the boat. They don’t know who to turn to, or who to trust.

So the secret remains, in the open where you can see it, but silence where it’s not openly discussed, maybe whispered about, hinted at, but never fully brought to light. The secret infects the society and each finds different ways to deal with what is, or what has happened.

Some go crazy from the secrets they keep, some get into drugs and alcohol, some find other ways to self medicate, others end up with a case of total denial and thus memory block. Others do what they can to bring the secrets to light in the open where they belong, so that others can have a look and so that the community can start to heal.

Secrets are not an easy thing for a society to have to keep and deal with. Long term (dirty) secrets, or even just regular secrets can be very bad for a societies morals, such as some to the events of Vietnam, like the Mai Li Massacare that were initially hushed up, and coverd for many years.

Since doing research into this, I have a better idea of why people keep secrets, what they stand to loose by exposing the secret, and the moral and social consequences, that secrets can have, and how they can affect a society. I like delving into worlds of knowledge, but sometimes what you find, you can’t, won’t, shouldn’t, or don’t feel like shareing, much like secrets. So they remain open like a sore, visible for most to see if they know what they are looking for, yet everyone dances around the issue instead of facing it head on.

Gang Stalking, just one more big open secret to add to everyone else’s.  Only time will tell the true impact such a secret will have on the psyche of his society.

June 1, 2009 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Letting the hate all hang out

Letting the hate all hang out.

I have been doing little things to fight back recently. The informants are still trying to mess with every aspect of my life, I find them disgraceful, I find the society disgraceful, because it allows such.

I have a client who is long over due paying some funds, but refuses to as instructed by the informant force. I have rallied back with revoking business services till payment is rendered. Now the informant force are doing everything they can to try to get me to bend on this matter. They seem to think that if they just keep messing with my life I will suddenly bend, and see things their way. Keep trying away, it just makes me more determined, I hate to watch such people triumph over others. Their actions remind me of specific cases that I have heard where they (the controlled courts) give a child to a known pedophile because the pedophile is one of theirs and the other parent was not cooperating with them, or refused to put up with abuse anymore. I have heard cases such as this, they truly are vermin and this system truly is corrupt. It’s disgusting, but this system does not care about morals, it cares only about compliance and ownership of people. 

Anyways I have been doing little things lately like filing complaints about every thing that they do, the same way they give us no room, we must do the same thing back to them into a corner the same way they would us. I don’t mean for targets to become hate filled people, but to sit back and watch injustice day after day is a little too much for the human soul.

Yesterday I let some of that hate hang out. I have been trying to not be a hate filled person. I have been trying to do the right thing, to remember to rise above the hate, but they really deserve what they get. I can’t feel sorry for them, because I realise that this is ongoing because so many people are complacent with it. Just like the abuse of children and those societies that kept it secret, and I am disgusted. Just because this system has always been like this does not mean that it should continue to be like this, and just because the silence you now keep is similar to the silence people kept about the mafia at one point, not talking about it, or denying it’s existence, does not mean it has to always be like this. I realise that people have the ability to change this if they want to, but currently they are not choosing to, and that just makes me angry.

I am a pretty nice person, but how long day in day out can you watch injustice before you become truly disgusted and truly hateful? I really try to remember not to become hateful, because that’s another trap that I absolutely don’t want to fall into.

So yesterday I let the hate all hang out. I wrote down everything that I was feeling about the informants and how I hoped they would pay for all the horrors they have caused. I hoped and I wished that the worst things would happen to them. I know that’s just so opposite to what Christianity teaches, but I am human and they really are making themselves worthy of my despise. I wrote for like 15 minutes straight, and it felt good. I just let the hate all hang out, and it was like an enema for my soul, it just released all the bad negative, hateful things that I had been hanging on to, trying to not let myself surrender to. I let it all out and it’s not mine anymore. (Well it’s a work in progress. One just logged onto my computer and I just let them have it. I really do think that they are vermin, and I really don’t like them, but I have to rise about it.) 

I woke up this morning and I felt so much better. Yesterday I followed up my release with catching up on some of the websites, and contacting some lawyers. (Whenever I start emailing lawyers oddly enough my emails stop working, or I don’t hear back.) I believe that since the ACLU has acknowledge that investigations are happening on innocent citizens, and they can go on for some time, with no one taking responsibility that targets have a better chance of using this to get legal help. See they don’t like it when we get legal help, or start to try to take legal action, so I believe this is the way to go. They also do whatever they want till you smack them back. Everytime they have gotten out of line, and I have taken direct action, they have fallen back. So be it reporting them repeatedly for things I can report them for, or documenting any noise, better to record, document, then report, it’s stopped. See if there is any chance that they will be caught or discovered they fall back. They are like those people who wear masks to commit their evil deeds and if they are unmasked or if there is the chance that they will be unmasked they don’t like that, so you have to use what you can against them.

These people are so funny, they would be the first to pretend that they are doing something for the betterment of society, but they are the most hateful people. They say hi in the hallways, but make sure to record every move you make, and they work with those who would try to come into our homes and poison our food, or do other destructive things. (I will never forget the story of the women who found that they had messed with her child’s diabetic medication.)  See people are quick to target people who say things out loud. It’s popular to target extremist sites or what they call hate sites, but over the last three years, I have not met anything so hateful as these people. They pull their hate crap on the down low. They pretend to be good citizens, they pretend that we have some kind of normal society, that it’s not some twisted freakish mess, that harbors a creepy secret. They pretend that they are decent, but if you look at what they allow to happen to Targeted Individuals at every level of society, they are the truly hateful ones, they are just good at masking it.

I have made some peace with the fact that the world has been like this for some time, I am clear on this fact, and I don’t dwell on it. This has been going on for generations, this is not new, only my awareness of it. However I refuse to be accepting of people and their complacency. I will not accept that anymore than I accept people who are complacent with letting little kids get hurt and harmed. Society is like this, because it’s been allowed to be like this. Sure many would like to do something to change this, but many others are so comfortable with the way things are. They protect the system and that is why this remains. It’s not because they don’t know, it’s because they are all too aware, and they know what can happen if they try to interfere with the system. Also many don’t want to interfere, they like it, it gives vermin power they would not have in any decent functioning society.

People think it’s wrong to say hateful things, and they are quick to target so called extremist sites, but I like my extremism where I can see it. I think sometimes having a place or being able to let it all hang out can be a good thing. I think in fact if we did not have places where people could let it all hang out, we might have bigger problems in society. I know for me, getting it all out helped, I feel cleansed. I think in some ways when you try to suppress people, or they feel that they can’t say what they wish you potentially create more problems than you solve. I am not saying let free flowing hate go unchecked, but I am starting to realise that sometimes being open where we can see and be negative just might solve a lot more problems than they create in society.

For me there is nothing more hateful and creepy right now, than the good citizens of the society who are in league with evil. They go along willingly in some cases unwilling in others with what is happening to thousands of people. It’s so gross. They pretend to be good, to have some kind of morals, but it’s a joke. Because they know what’s happening and they go along with it to protect themselves and this system. They smile pretend to be good, but work in conjunction for evil. I finally just got disgusted, because it is hypocritical.

We lie and we pretend that our society is not doing what others have done in the past, and it’s not acceptable. We like to bury our heads in the sad, enacting draconian laws about what people can say, and think, but then on an underlying hidden level, we commit all this true evil, and just because it’s not open we then get to think and pretend that we are good, but we are not.

This targeting has given me some real perspective. Right now I am prayerful again. I don’t want to let hate become who I am, I have come too far, but it’s good to recognise this aspect, and that’s why I have to focus on finding ways to overcoming such a hateful and destructive system.

I am saddened by much of what I have seen, by much of what I now understand about society and how it really functions. Yet I also know that we must retain hope.  Change can happen but not if people are in denial or happy with the way that things are. Change will only happen if people understand and acknowledge that there is a problem. Till then the usual suspects will just continue to be sacrificed to the system, and much of society will go about their business with a pretend blind eye, hoping that their turn never comes.

May 27, 2009 Posted by | Controlled society, Corruption, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, Informants, Life, Minorities, Snitches, Targeted Individual | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Crime, Cover Up, Conspiracy, Collusion.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/world/europe/21ireland.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print

I hate talking about these types of stories but they have to be discussed, the report says the sexual abuse of the boys was ““endemic.”

[quote]Prevalent in or peculiar to a particular locality, region, or people:[/quote]

It was happening all throughout the system.
[quote]1930s to the 1990s, when the last of the institutions closed.[/quote]

This happened for over 60 years. For 60 long years thousands of abuses and it was again kept quite, by a community, a church, a society.

 

[quote]It exposes for the first time the scope of the problem in Ireland, as well as how the government and the church colluded in perpetuating an abusive system. The revelations have also had the effect of stripping the Catholic Church, which once set the agenda in Ireland, of much of its moral authority and political power.
[/quote]

See it was not just the church that covered this up but the government, the government that is suppose to protect it’s citizens help in colluding the investigation and in covering this atrocity up. You see these scenarios time and time again. This was a society that kept this secret, and for those who did try to get it exposed, it was kept quite, time and time again, by those who were in a position of trust and authority.
[quote]Some 30,000 children were sent to such places over six decades, the report says, often against their families’ wishes and because of pressure from powerful local priests. They were sent because their families could not afford to care for them, because their mothers had committed adultery or given birth out of wedlock, or because one or both of their parents was ill, drunken or abusive. They were also sent because of petty crime, like stealing food, or because they had missed school.
[/quote]

Again we see a target population of the poor and the powerless, who could ill afford to go up against the church.

[quote]“Punching, flogging, assault and bodily attacks, hitting with the hand, kicking, ear pulling, hair pulling, head shaving, beating on the soles of the feet, burning, scalding, stabbing, severe beatings with or without clothes, being made to kneel and stand in fixed positions for lengthy periods, made to sleep outside overnight, being forced into cold or excessively hot baths and showers, hosed down with cold water before being beaten, beaten while hanging from hooks on the wall, being set upon by dogs, being restrained in order to be beaten, physical assaults by more than one person, and having objects thrown at them.”

Some of the schools operated essentially as workhouses. In one school, Goldenbridge, girls as young as 7 spent hours a day making rosaries by stringing beads onto lengths of wire. They were given quotas: 600 beads on weekdays and 900 on Sundays.

Girls were routinely sexually abused, often by more than one person at a time, the report said, in “dormitories, schools, motor vehicles, bathrooms, staff bedrooms, churches, sacristies, fields, parlors, the residences of clergy, holiday locations and while with godparents and employers.”
[/quote]

Thousands of innocent children at the hands of these animals, these abusers. The worst part is you see these patterns repeating themselves, not just in Ireland, or even just the Catholic Church.

[quote]“While horrific, widespread reports of abuse and cover-up are sadly quite common, the significance here is that a government panel is conclusively saying that the finger-pointing and blame-shifting and excuse-making of the church hierarchy is bogus,” he said in an interview.

The commission was formed in 2000, after an explosive series of radio programs and documentaries in the 1990s began exposing a terrible secret that had been kept by an entire society: the details of what went on in the children’s homes. In 1999, Bertie Ahern, then the prime minister, issued a blanket apology to the victims of the abuse. [/quote]

Exposing the terrible secret that had been kept by an entire society. See societies can keep secrets, and in this case the secret affected it’s most pure, it’s most vulnerable, but they still kept the secret and protected the system.

The creepy part as usual is you have the public outrage, you have the investigation into this, which I don’t think had any choice but to find the church guilty, but you also have what I see consistently, the church and the perpetrators getting off scott free. Their names were protected because the church, which is just oh so sorry for what happened to the children, sued the state to protect the names and identities of the abusers. Many of them will never pay for what they did to these children.

[quote]“The report is significant in that it provides a detailed anatomy of how the abuse occurred and the institutions in which it occurred,” he said in an interview. “The problem is that you spend almost 10 years and who knows how much money, and you never get to the point of saying who was responsible.”
[/quote]

If the other pattern that I am use to seeing is consistent, it will also mean that over the 60 year time period, many of these men will have moved into top positions of power, because this is also a constant pattern with abusers, they don’t pay for their crimes, they move into increasingly greater positions of power, and thus they can cover up the crimes and protect themselves and their fellow abusers. It’s a consistent pattern.

This is why many things that we might call conspiracy do not come out, it is often not just the people doing the abuses that are keeping quite, but it is those around them who are aware of the abuses but who do nothing and continue to protect the system. If these people will keep this type of secret, which violated the innocent, and protected a system that was instrumental in their degradations and violations, then can we expect anymore from society when it comes to being targets of Gang Stalking or other forms of government torture and harassment?

May 23, 2009 Posted by | Abuse, Children, conspiracies, Conspiracy, Controlled society, Corruption, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wickedness in high places

How many have seen these pictures?

http://www.dailyillusions.com/2007/11/08/young-woman-vs-old-woman-double-image-illusion/

Do you see an old woman or do you see a young woman? Do you see either of the two? Do you see anything?

Everyone sees something different. Some see the whole picture, some see one or the other, some see nothing, and no matter what you do, it will continue to be that way. What you have to understand is that the world and our targeting is no different.

There are some legit people who refuse to see anything at all. Then there are those who choose to see nothing but mental illness. There are others who know something is going on but choose to see vigilantes or organised stalkers. Then there are others who see Gang Stalking and that the government is doing it, but think we can get it fixed with legislation. then there are those who see the whole picture, the whole corrupted beauty of it all, and realise this is a systemic problem and so systemic solutions must be found.

This system did not happen over night, they spent generations getting the world to be the way it is. This system has shown that it consistently works to keep people in line, time and time again. I have pointed this out before, but let me point this out again. We are up against a system, and if you don’t get this, then you can not realistically fix what is wrong.

http://www.targetedindividuals.com/System.html

[quote]Many people grow up in society never realising that the world is not really controlled by just governments but it’s also controlled by a system. Some people might consider this system similar to another government that operates outside of the mainstream government. The system is more structured and less democratic than many of us realise, or are willing to believe.

The system that really exists and that controls society is really made up of the powerful and elite, Corporations and Governments. The powerful elite, do not care who is in government, because they will always have the primary say with how things go, and what the final outcome is. The same has become true for corporations, and powerful interests. Then there is the will of the government, the body that appears to be elected by the people, but who is there to really serve the will of these powerful interests.

To keep the system in place and running smoothly, there are appendages that are set in place to teach the population how to act, think, behave, and yes how to conform to the system. The system wants people to come up thinking that they are completely free and can act, think, and feel however they choose to. This is true to an extent, as long as your interest do not run too contrary to what the system has in mind. Once your interest start to run contrary, or you do something to step out of what the system considers acceptable boundaries, that is when you enter the Targeted Individual zone.
[/quote]

Be it pedophile rings, the CIA drug running, it will not change till people realise this is systemic and address the issues from that stand point. Beyond that you will just go around in circles and this will never change.

Even when things do get exposed, please read about what happens.

Ours is not the first big scandal to be exposed, or uncovered. If you do the follow up you will see that Gary Webb who exposed the CIA selling drugs in minority communities was falsely discredited by his own media counterparts. He was moved to some crappy job he hated, he ended up quitting. His life from there took a downturn, but he was still speaking out, he published a book about the CIA selling drugs, and he was rumored to be starting another book. However he ended up with a bullet to the brain, an apparent suicide, many will attest that he was not suicidal, others will tell you differently.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1230244889

[quote]
Indeed, some of the writers in Buzzsaw say that, before their own experiences, they were among the scoffers. Webb writes, “If we had met five years ago, you wouldn’t have found a more staunch defender of the newspaper industry than me … I was winning awards, getting raises, lecturing college classes, appearing on TV shows, and judging journalism contests. So how could I possibly agree with people like Noam Chomsky and Ben Bagdikian, who were claiming the system didn’t work, that it was steered by powerful special interests and corporations, and existed to protect the power elite?”

But, like most of the contributors to “Into the Buzzsaw,” he did his job too well and the powers that be hurled him onto the other side of the looking glass. “And then I wrote some stories that made me realize how sadly misplaced my bliss had been,” he writes. “The reason I’d enjoyed such smooth sailing for so long hadn’t been, as I’d assumed, because I was careful and diligent and good at my job … The truth was that, in all those years, I hadn’t written anything important enough to suppress.”
[/quote]

Gary Webb died for trying to expose this story. Instead of being supported, he was let down, and the end result is the same. If he had been supported, the truth come of come to light.

I am not trying to discourage anyone, but you have to wake up, just a little bit.

Here is a link to the series that Gary Webb wrote. The Dark Alliance.
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/webb.html

There were protests in the streets when his story came out, for a moment he was a hero for the people, till they in traditional fashion turned on him. Well I should say he was not supported the way he should have been.

The lawyer Anita Bell who took the case of these people, ended up being targeted, she almost died, and fled to Canada, she lost her refuge claim, fled with her family to Israel, and I don’t know what happened to her after this.

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=69

[quote]
Anita E. Belle, a black female practicing law in Florida, alleged that COINTELPRO reared its ugly head against her after she filed cases on behalf of blacks and whites in seven states harmed due to the Central Intelligence Agency or CIAs role in importing illegal drugs into black communities. She alleged that at least one reputed CIA agent admitted the agency conspired with organized crime to use illegal drugs as a means of pharmaceutically enslaving African-Americans. In early 2000, five of her seven cases were consolidated as the Nicaraguan Contras Narcotics Trafficking Litigation, MDL 1331, in the federal court in Gainesville, Florida.

Belle claims that the cases became so sabotaged that she and her family were forced to flee Florida in fear of their lives. She first moved to North Carolina, but left there after witnesses in the CIA cases were threatened. She then returned to her hometown of Detroit, Michigan.

Belle recalled the Iran-Contra scandal that plagued the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. During the 2000 Florida election debacle, Belle made a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request to the FBI for the criminal records of the former president and his sons, Florida governor Jeb Bush and presidential candidate/Texas governor George W. Bush. The FBI denied her FOIA request on privacy grounds. Belle then sued the FBI, arguing that the federal criminal records of public officials should not be protected by privacy, else Americans may unwittingly elect organized crimelords who will undermine the integrity of the government. Meanwhile, Belle claims the retaliation against her and her family continued in Detroit to such an extent that she added COINTELPRO allegations to her case against the FBI.

Belle alleged the Florida Bar was a co-conspirator with the FBI in the agencys COINTELPRO activities, accusing the Florida Bar of disbarring her so as to discredit her and halt her suits against the federal government. She alleged that the Florida Bars investigator on her disbarment case, Bill Freeh, was a retired FBI agent and a close relative of Louis Freeh, the director of the FBI at that time.
[/quote]

Most traces of her and references of her that I could find, I am no longer able to find or locate on the Internet.

Next senator DeCamp, he tried to help uncover the fact that young boys were being used for sex, and to help transport drugs. The victims were bulled, jailed, suicides, etc. The case was delayed, and finally one low level drug dealer was convicted. The rest, the accused, all powerful, all rich, they advanced in their careers. The victims suffered, and the perpetrators advanced. The lesson is, this was all done to protect the system. But then Senator Decamp asks himself, when do we know if the system itself has become corrupt? I think the true targets in the Targeted Individual community should know this answer, and if you don’t, you should look into it.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1205712268
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/franklincoverupexcerpt.shtml

[quote]
Now I think I do understand the Franklin case. I know, now, that all the public officials involved in Franklin-whether they ever heard of Billy Budd or not-fully understood what they were doing.

And what they all have done, and will continue to do in this case, Franklin, and no doubt many others like it, is this: Protect the “system” at all costs. The “system” is the only ultimate sacred cow-not any particular law or constitution, but only “the system.” Because, ultimately, it is the system which makes certain that the individuals functioning within it – from judges to lawyers, to prosecutors, to politicians, to businessmen – have their places and positions, and opportunities and pecking order, and future.

And, though it is unfortunate, that on occasion the protection of the “system” requires the deliberate sacrifice of perfectly innocent people, that is hoped overall to be the exception rather than the rule. But without the “system” . .

But then I have one final, nagging question. How do I know when, or if, the “system” itself has become so corrupted, that evil is the rule, rather than the exception? And when that occurs, what do I do about it? But I think I know the answer to that one – my oId commanding officer in Vietnam told me what I had to do. I made some promises to Bill, and I intend to keep them.

John DeCamp
[/quote]

Also one of the whistle blowers for this, she is a targeted individual, her video is on YouTube. Here is here website.
http://www.oneagleswingsfearnoevil.com/

So you see all the people who tried to expose this, and the victims, one set of circumstances, and the rest another.

Then we have priest who are molesting kids, a lot of those early victims who exposed it did not fair well, others who tried to expose things along this line, also did not fair well.
http://www.projecttruth2.com/
http://www.theinquiry.ca/

The system at all levels protects the corrupted, those committing the crimes, and the good suffer, and we often suffer, because those who could help sit back and do nothing.

“The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing”
-Albert Einstein.

It’s always the same, and unless it’s addressed at this level nothing will change, and even if tomorrow someone took it upon themselves to do a real story about Gang Stalking, about what is happening, we would probably, get the same sick results. You might get the shock and awe, and a few fake targets, maybe even a few real targets on shows and radio, but then it would go back to being a none issue. As some of you can see, there is an effort to make this look like it’s not systemic, like it’s not being done at a governmental level, and efforts to keep you misinformed, and to make sure the true nature of this does not get exposed.

This has to be fought at the correct level, and the systemic issues must be addressed.

I can only put the information out there, and much like that picture at the begining of this post, people are going to see what they are going to see, and interpret things the way they want to interpret things. Some will see nothing, some will see part of the truth, some will see all of the truth. I can only put out the information, people have to figure out the rest for themselves.

How many have seen these pictures?

http://www.dailyillusions.com/2007/11/08/young-woman-vs-old-woman-double-image-illusion/
Do you see an old woman or do you see a young woman? Do you see either of the two? Do you see anything?

Everyone sees something different. Some see the whole picture, some see one or the other, some see nothing, and no matter what you do, it will continue to be that way. What you have to understand is that the world and our targeting is no different.

There are some legit people who refuse to see anything at all. Then there are those who choose to see nothing but mental illness. There are others who know something is going on but choose to see vigilantes or organised stalkers. Then there are others who see Gang Stalking and that the government is doing it, but think we can get it fixed with legislation. then there are those who see the whole picture, the whole corrupted beauty of it all, and realise this is a systemic problem and so systemic solutions must be found.

This system did not happen over night, they spent generations getting the world to be the way it is. This system has shown that it consistently works to keep people in line, time and time again. I have pointed this out before, but let me point this out again. We are up against a system, and if you don’t get this, then you can not realistically fix what is wrong.

http://www.targetedindividuals.com/System.html

[quote]Many people grow up in society never realising that the world is not really controlled by just governments but it’s also controlled by a system. Some people might consider this system similar to another government that operates outside of the mainstream government. The system is more structured and less democratic than many of us realise, or are willing to believe.

The system that really exists and that controls society is really made up of the powerful and elite, Corporations and Governments. The powerful elite, do not care who is in government, because they will always have the primary say with how things go, and what the final outcome is. The same has become true for corporations, and powerful interests. Then there is the will of the government, the body that appears to be elected by the people, but who is there to really serve the will of these powerful interests.

To keep the system in place and running smoothly, there are appendages that are set in place to teach the population how to act, think, behave, and yes how to conform to the system. The system wants people to come up thinking that they are completely free and can act, think, and feel however they choose to. This is true to an extent, as long as your interest do not run too contrary to what the system has in mind. Once your interest start to run contrary, or you do something to step out of what the system considers acceptable boundaries, that is when you enter the Targeted Individual zone.
[/quote]

Be it pedophile rings, the CIA drug running, it will not change till people realise this is systemic and address the issues from that stand point. Beyond that you will just go around in circles and this will never change.

Even when things do get exposed, please read about what happens.

Ours is not the first big scandal to be exposed, or uncovered. If you do the follow up you will see that Gary Webb who exposed the CIA selling drugs in minority communities was falsely discredited by his own media counterparts. He was moved to some crappy job he hated, he ended up quitting. His life from there took a downturn, but he was still speaking out, he published a book about the CIA selling drugs, and he was rumored to be starting another book. However he ended up with a bullet to the brain, an apparent suicide, many will attest that he was not suicidal, others will tell you differently.
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1230244889

[quote]
Indeed, some of the writers in Buzzsaw say that, before their own experiences, they were among the scoffers. Webb writes, “If we had met five years ago, you wouldn’t have found a more staunch defender of the newspaper industry than me … I was winning awards, getting raises, lecturing college classes, appearing on TV shows, and judging journalism contests. So how could I possibly agree with people like Noam Chomsky and Ben Bagdikian, who were claiming the system didn’t work, that it was steered by powerful special interests and corporations, and existed to protect the power elite?”

But, like most of the contributors to “Into the Buzzsaw,” he did his job too well and the powers that be hurled him onto the other side of the looking glass. “And then I wrote some stories that made me realize how sadly misplaced my bliss had been,” he writes. “The reason I’d enjoyed such smooth sailing for so long hadn’t been, as I’d assumed, because I was careful and diligent and good at my job … The truth was that, in all those years, I hadn’t written anything important enough to suppress.”
[/quote]

Gary Webb died for trying to expose this story. Instead of being supported, he was let down, and the end result is the same. If he had been supported, the truth come of come to light.

I am not trying to discourage anyone, but you have to wake up, just a little bit.

Here is a link to the series that Gary Webb wrote. The Dark Alliance.
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/webb.html
There were protests in the streets when his story came out, for a moment he was a hero for the people, till they in traditional fashion turned on him. Well I should say he was not supported the way he should have been.

The lawyer Anita Bell who took the case of these people, ended up being targeted, she almost died, and fled to Canada, she lost her refuge claim, fled with her family to Israel, and I don’t know what happened to her after this.

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=69
[quote]
Anita E. Belle, a black female practicing law in Florida, alleged that COINTELPRO reared its ugly head against her after she filed cases on behalf of blacks and whites in seven states harmed due to the Central Intelligence Agency or CIAs role in importing illegal drugs into black communities. She alleged that at least one reputed CIA agent admitted the agency conspired with organized crime to use illegal drugs as a means of pharmaceutically enslaving African-Americans. In early 2000, five of her seven cases were consolidated as the Nicaraguan Contras Narcotics Trafficking Litigation, MDL 1331, in the federal court in Gainesville, Florida.
Belle claims that the cases became so sabotaged that she and her family were forced to flee Florida in fear of their lives. She first moved to North Carolina, but left there after witnesses in the CIA cases were threatened. She then returned to her hometown of Detroit, Michigan.
Belle recalled the Iran-Contra scandal that plagued the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. During the 2000 Florida election debacle, Belle made a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request to the FBI for the criminal records of the former president and his sons, Florida governor Jeb Bush and presidential candidate/Texas governor George W. Bush. The FBI denied her FOIA request on privacy grounds. Belle then sued the FBI, arguing that the federal criminal records of public officials should not be protected by privacy, else Americans may unwittingly elect organized crimelords who will undermine the integrity of the government. Meanwhile, Belle claims the retaliation against her and her family continued in Detroit to such an extent that she added COINTELPRO allegations to her case against the FBI.
Belle alleged the Florida Bar was a co-conspirator with the FBI in the agencys COINTELPRO activities, accusing the Florida Bar of disbarring her so as to discredit her and halt her suits against the federal government. She alleged that the Florida Bars investigator on her disbarment case, Bill Freeh, was a retired FBI agent and a close relative of Louis Freeh, the director of the FBI at that time.
[/quote]

Most traces of her and references of her that I could find, I am no longer able to find or locate on the Internet.
 
Next senator DeCamp, he tried to help uncover the fact that young boys were being used for sex, and to help transport drugs. The victims were bulled, jailed, suicides, etc. The case was delayed, and finally one low level drug dealer was convicted. The rest, the accused, all powerful, all rich, they advanced in their careers. The victims suffered, and the perpetrators advanced. The lesson is, this was all done to protect the system. But then Senator Decamp asks himself, when do we know if the system itself has become corrupt? I think the true targets in the Targeted Individual community should know this answer, and if you don’t, you should look into it. 
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1205712268
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/franklincoverupexcerpt.shtml
[quote]
Now I think I do understand the Franklin case. I know, now, that all the public officials involved in Franklin-whether they ever heard of Billy Budd or not-fully understood what they were doing.

And what they all have done, and will continue to do in this case, Franklin, and no doubt many others like it, is this: Protect the “system” at all costs. The “system” is the only ultimate sacred cow-not any particular law or constitution, but only “the system.” Because, ultimately, it is the system which makes certain that the individuals functioning within it – from judges to lawyers, to prosecutors, to politicians, to businessmen – have their places and positions, and opportunities and pecking order, and future.

And, though it is unfortunate, that on occasion the protection of the “system” requires the deliberate sacrifice of perfectly innocent people, that is hoped overall to be the exception rather than the rule. But without the “system” . .

But then I have one final, nagging question. How do I know when, or if, the “system” itself has become so corrupted, that evil is the rule, rather than the exception? And when that occurs, what do I do about it? But I think I know the answer to that one – my oId commanding officer in Vietnam told me what I had to do. I made some promises to Bill, and I intend to keep them.

John DeCamp
[/quote]

 

Also one of the whistle blowers for this, she is a targeted individual, her video is on YouTube. Here is here website.
http://www.oneagleswingsfearnoevil.com/

So you see all the people who tried to expose this, and the victims, one set of circumstances, and the rest another. 
 
Then we have priest who are molesting kids, a lot of those early victims who exposed it did not fair well, others who tried to expose things along this line, also did not fair well. 
http://www.projecttruth2.com/
http://www.theinquiry.ca/
 
The system at all levels protects the corrupted, those committing the crimes, and the good suffer, and we often suffer, because those who could help sit back and do nothing.

“The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing”
-Albert Einstein.

It’s always the same, and unless it’s addressed at this level nothing will change, and even if tomorrow someone took it upon themselves to do a real story about Gang Stalking, about what is happening, we would probably, get the same sick results. You might get the shock and awe, and a few fake targets, maybe even a few real targets on shows and radio, but then it would go back to being a none issue. As some of you can see, there is an effort to make this look like it’s not systemic, like it’s not being done at a governmental level, and efforts to keep you misinformed, and to make sure the true nature of this does not get exposed.
 
This has to be fought at the correct level, and the systemic issues must be addressed. 

I can only put the information out there, and much like that picture at the begining of this post, people are going to see what they are going to see, and interpret things the way they want to interpret things. Some will see nothing, some will see part of the truth, some will see all of the truth. I can only put out the information, people have to figure out the rest for themselves.
 
Ephesians 6:12 “We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.

6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.

April 24, 2009 Posted by | Awareness, CIA, Citizen Informants, conspiracies, Conspiracy, control, Corruption, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, Targeted Individual | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Jiverly Wong. Two sides

I have got a theory so let’s put it to the test.

This should be obvious, but I am sure it will not be.
Part of what Jiverly Wong said is that people were spreading rumours about him, specifically the cops. After his death there were stories printed about him that he was crack/cocaine drug addicted loser, I have yet to find anything to say that this was true. There was also this story that said he was a failed loser who planned to rob a bank. Where did these rumour come from? From the general population? I don’t think so. The rumour about him wanting to rob a bank was given to the police by an informant. This rumour came from an informant, an informant who feed the rumour to the cops, so if the cops are not spreading rumours about him, how did this rumour find it’s way into the papers? Aren’t these informant tips suppose to be secret? Yet after his death, the man who says that the cops were spreading rumours about him, has a story printed saying he was addicted to cocaine, and had planned to rob a bank. Seems like even in death, he might be proving himself correct.

This was a tip from 1999, 10 years ago, so how did it have this long a shelf life if nothing ever came of it? How did it find it’s way into several articles?

Also the rumours about him having a girlfriend, and previously a wife, I have yet to have this stuff fully confirmed, the parents don’t know anything about either.

Based on the article below, I would say that there was rumour floating around about him, a rumour that came from an informant years ago, but would make it’s way into the papers after his death? Sounds to me like this rumour might have been floating around, and if so, this rumour could only have come from the cops, who the informant gave the tip to, and this would prove a part of what Jiverly Wong was saying.

Also he was laid off from his job, not fired, but any paper could make that mistake. Ofcourse if they were taking time to check the story, and not just print rumour and hearsay that would paint the guy as a nut job, they also might have noticed this little error.

I still want to know more about this wife, the parents are just finding out about it in the papers, and why has she not been contacted, were the records they found correct? Did they find records for someone else named Jiverly Wong, in their quick fact checking?

The article below really tried to portray him in the worst light possible, with a lot of misinformation, information which I have not in some ways been able to verify. What is more certain however is that the information about the drug addiction and bank heist rumour most likely came from the police, and if this was a 1999 rumour why was it still floating around, unless what he said in his letter had some validity?

Anyways here is the article.

 

[quote]http://www.nypost.com/seven/04052009/news/nationalnews/failed_life_for_killer_coward_162952.htm

FAILED LIFE FOR KILLER ‘COWARD’

* DIVORCED & LOST JOB BEFORE MASSACRE
* CO-WORKER WORRIED ‘HE’D SHOOT US ALL’
By LORENA MONGELLI in Binghamton and TODD VENEZIA and JAMES FANELLI in New York City

The lunatic behind the Binghamton massacre was a pathetic, gun-loving coward who got divorced, lost his job and was driven to depression because he could barely speak English after many years in the United States, officials and people who knew him said yesterday.
 

His life in the pits, Jiverly Wong, 41, became a regular at Gander Mountain, a sporting goods store, in the six months leading up to the rampage, buying and returning as many as six guns after firing each a few times.

Wong — who has a daughter in California, according to a coworker — would get agitated when staffers had trouble with his broken English.

“He would get frustrated,” Dave Henderson, who taught a class at the store, told the Press & Sun Bulletin of Binghamton. “There was times I wouldn’t even talk to him anymore.”

It was not clear if that was where he bought the two guns found on his body after Friday’s massacre: 9mm and .45-caliber pistols.

His former co-workers at the ShopVac vacuum-cleaner assembly facility were equally frustrated by his communication problems, and were worried about his gun-loving ways.

On Mondays, when asked about his weekends, Wong routinely replied, “I went to a shooting range,” said ex-colleague David Carrico, 18.

“He liked shooting guns. I was worried he would come into work one day, get angry and shoot us all.”

It wasn’t until five months after his November firing from ShopVac that he finally did snap — but he directed his rage elsewhere, at the language school from which he essentially flunked out.
Wong on Friday picked up a pair of guns, hoisted a bulging sack of ammunition and marched maniacally into the American Civic Association, killing 13 people before turning the gun on himself. Another four victims remain hospitalized, but are expected to survive.

A clearer picture emerged yesterday of Wong’s tale of woe before his grisly end.

The last 10 years of his sorry life included cocaine addiction, a bank-heist plan that never came to fruition, a divorce and lost jobs in New York and California.

Wong — who at one point changed his last name to Voong, and also sometimes went by the name Linh — was born in Vietnam to an ethnic Chinese family.

He came to the United States in the early 1990s with his family and became a naturalized citizen.

Wong quickly wound up in trouble, as court records in Los Angeles show that he was charged with forgery in 1992. It’s not clear what became of the case. His family finally settled in Binghamton.

He got a gun permit in the mid-1990s.

New York officials investigated him in 1999 after an informant said that he was planning to rob a bank and had a “crack or cocaine” habit, Binghamton Police Chief Joseph Zikuski said. Nothing came of the allegations.

A couple of years later, Wong left for California, where he got a job driving a delivery truck for Kikka Sushi and lived in a cheap Inglewood motel. At the fleabag pay-by-the-month joint — near the airport with bars on the windows — all he had in his room was a bed and a 52-inch TV, fellow tenant Eric Sherman told The Post.

“All he would do is sit inside his apartment and chain-smoke,” he said. “He didn’t talk much and I just thought he didn’t talk because he didn’t really speak English.”

Los Angeles court records also show that Wong was married. He was divorced in July 2005.

That was quickly followed by his abrupt departure from Kikka Sushi — and the West Coast altogether.

Wong complained he was disgruntled at the company, where he made $500 per week.

Back in Binghamton, Wong was able to hold down a steady job at ShopVac until he was laid off, but was again upset over his low pay.
“I work so hard, but they only pay me $8 an hour,” he complained to colleague Donald Ackley.

He was also tormented by some coworkers and sat alone in the lunchroom.

“Sometimes they picked on him a little bit,” he said. “They would say, ‘It’s wrong, it’s Wong, it’s wrong, it’s Wong.’ ”

Depressed and angry, he tried to better himself in the area where he was most vulnerable: his lack of English skills. He enrolled in an intermediate-level class at the association.

But once again he failed by hardly bothering to show up.

“His attendance was so erratic, he was dropped,” said Elisabeth Hayes, his English teacher, who was out on vacation on the day of the massacre. Her substitute, Roberta King, 72, wound up dead.

“This was a nasty act of irrationality. Why did he have to do that?” Hayes asked. “We could have been there for him if he needed support. The class was kind to him.

“It’s a true American nightmare.”

In his final months, Wong — who wore a hearing aid, according to driving records — was miserable, surviving on $200 in unemployment benefits and living in his parents’ gritty home.

By the time he was ready to commit his cold-blooded crime, the only place he found solace was at a gym, a pal said.

“He seemed a little depressed,” said Son Quach, a grocery-store owner who had worked out with him at the Court Jester gym in nearby Johnson City.

He also griped about a recent break-up with his girlfriend, but would not elaborate.

Wong was inconsolable and often whined about his “bad luck.”

“We picked up that apparently people were making fun of him and he felt that he was being degraded because of his inability to speak English and he was upset about that,” Zikuski said.

The police chief said Wong’s suicide was his final act of failure.

Police believe Wong planned to go out in a blaze of glory in a gunfight with cops, but got cold feet when he heard sirens and put a bullet between his eyes.

“He must have been a coward,” Zikuski said.

“We speculate that when he heard the sirens, he decided to end his own life. He was heavily armed, had a lot of ammunition on him and, thank God, before more lives were lost, that he decided to do that.”

Additional reporting by Tori Richards in Los Angeles, Josh Williams and Brad Hamilton in Binghamton and AP

lorena.mongelli@nypost.com
[/quote]
If he survived 18 years of being Gang Stalked, and if he is telling the truth, then he was not a coward for those 18 years, it take a lot to survive being under investigation 24/7. Apparently the alligation of drug addition might be false and this might be the rumours that he spoke about, sounds like there was the typical workplace mobbing involved, and the community Gang Stalking, which might be part of the reason he dropped out of the language school. See if you take the time to listen to his side, you can either write him off as some paranoid whack job, or if you look deeper, he might have been burtally targeted and harassed for 18 years and if this is the case, more needs to be done to bring this to the light.

April 14, 2009 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

What would Jesus do?

Yeah the title sounds corny, but if you remember what this weekend is, it’s Easter weekend, and yesterday was good Friday. That’s the day the state assasinated him by nailing him to a cross, after bringing up phoney charges against him, by false witnesses. Sound familiar?

He came with a mission to help people. He was persecuted at times, until finally the state found a way to target him once and for all. They used a snitch that was a part of his company to sell him out, and along the way he had to tell the powers that be that they were corrupt and misleading the people. He would get angry at times, he also found it frustrating how people were at times. The spread rumours about him, said he had a demon, that he was crazy, a friend of sinners and publicans, they asked him all sorts of questions to try to set him up, like is it right to pay taxes? Hoping he would say no, so they could set him up.

In doing this activism, I realise that State oppression and the parasite informants don’t change that much. The same stuff that happened then, is the same stuff that pretty much happens now. The world does not change, and the people in charge know how to manipulate the people in the system. They know how to keep people in check, give them a sense of freedom, and then keep then in check in various ways.

I have been thinking about this a lot, because I am wondering what he would do about the informants? Would he try to out them, out them but subtly, or just ignore them? I have been thinking about the ways he handled himself, because I see a lot of this stuff is the same. He came across the same kind of system.

The more I see of these people’s actions and the deliberate tactics they use, the more I am reminded of his activism/ministry. I know a lot of people might not be able to relate, or this might not be there cup of tea, but if you are a target, it might not hurt to brush up on the way he handled irritating people who were spreading rumours, slander, a family that cared for him, but might not have been there for him, the way he needed, people trying to set him up, officials that were corrupt and teaching the common people all the wrong things, and Judas the snitch that would betray him.

Most times I just ignore them, but I don’t think this is the right approach, so I have been wondering what others would do. I know people always think of Jesus as peaceable, and for the most part he was, but he was not above telling the corrupt leaders what they were, what they were doing to the people, and he could hold his own.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/mat009.htm

The same type of parasites then and now. It’s fascinating, but it’s true. So that’s what I have been wondering, how did he handle being around Judas, how do you handle these snitches? How do you handle the provocation they bring, and cause, and what is the best way to deal with them?

I think you can learn a lot from the past, but I also think each activist is going to be different and you have to find ways to deal with each situation. What works for one will not work for the other, and yet we can take advise from past targets and apply them quite easily to the current situations at hand in trying to determine what to do under some circumstance.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/mat011.htm

[quote]18 For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, He hath a devil.
19 The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified of her children.[/quote]

Always trying to find something. They also called him crazy at times as well.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/mat012.htm
[quote] 14 Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him.[/quote]

Always looking for a way to bring down those who would question and challenge the system.

A lot of the stuff John Lennon said is coming back to me as well. The quote is from the US vs John Lennon.

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/the-us-vs-john-lennon/

[quote]“When it gets down to having to use violence then you are playing the systems games. The establishment irritates you, pull your beard and flick your face to make you fight, because once they have you violent then they know how to handle you. “
[/quote]

They really don’t change that much, this parasitic element. I guess each person in every generation has to find their own way to deal with them, and leave what they can for the next target.

It’s interesting however, a lot does not change in the way these people think work and operate, it would be nice for once to fully win.

April 11, 2009 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Cointelpro, conspiracies, Conspiracy, Controlled society, crazy, dissident, False Prophets, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, government corruption, Informants, Isolation, Jesus, judas, slavery, slaves, Snitches, Targeted Individual | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

How did they do it?

How did they do it? This is what I am wondering how did they live with the hypocrisy of it all? While the west was busy insulting countries like East Germany for their snitches and informants they were doing the same thing.

This system is not a new thing, we saw an increase of this recently in some of our lives, but just reading about the John Lennon files and and many others I ask the question, how did they live with the hypocrisy of it all?

They had citizen informants while the Stasi had theirs, they were conducting widescale investigations, and this has been ongoing for some time, yet we use to really look down on countries like that. Our country is not like that, we don’t do those things. It’s like the time those tv evangelist got caught with their pants down.

It’s the most irritating thing, knowing what I now know. So I just had to ask that question. How did they do it?
I am revising my earlier statement, though many are a part of the informant system, some do not understand the bigger picture that is ongoing. Eg. They are asked to take part in the operation, but maybe believe that it’s just observation of an individual and have no idea of the wider plague that’s happening. I wouldn’t even know where to begin. How do you tell these people the full scope of what you are aware of, and what they are a part of? It feels so wrong to make them aware. In some ways I would like to leave them in their innocence, but then they will just have this wave wash over them and they won’t know what hit them. It’s six of one, half dozen of the other.
A couple of fun things we can do to mess with them. They use a lot of disinformation with us, so I find that turn around is fair play and it works really well, so use at your own discretion, and use it wisely.

They need time to set up their operation. Eg. Whenever I go someplace really unexpectedly, or do something unexpected, you can tell that it takes them time to get their informants into play, and get the game going. They are not as slick as they seem. Don’t get me wrong, they will be everywhere, but they are not as slick as they think they are.

Eg. I related the story back before I knew what was ongoing. I had called for school in the U.S. and had spoken to a Cathy several times, I was really familiar with her, then I had decided to look at some Canadian school’s, and called, well I spoke to a Cathy, got all my information from Cathy, and as I got off the phone, I realised it was Cathy. The same Cathy that I had been speaking to. Now this was before I knew about Gang Stalking, but at that stage, I knew there was something seriously wrong. Later I would find out that Cathy or Kathy or whatever is or was a common name they would use.

The targets if they arrived at a place and were looking for a target, would also use specific names to pass on the fact they were looking for a specific person. So phone calls, unknown online communications, all surveillance. Expect that if you are communicating with someone who is not an informant today, these people will go behind your back, and make contact with them if they can, and manipulate the situations.

They did this when I owned a business. Contacted all my customers behind my back. One client introduced another client to me, named Cathy, at the time I was really unaware, but that should give you some idea. They tried to get my clients to leave, or introduce people to cause stress to my company. Lot’s of little things i would find out later on. That they had done and been doing for years, before I became aware. They truly are parasitic.

So how can you get at them? How can you win? Well I was thinking about this, and the slaves of the system, the aware that know what is going on, you probably stand a better chance of destroying them internally than most of us, externals. I mean you have the chance to learn and know more about how they operate, if they are chipping you, and others like you. The way the communication system works, the little commands you get from the earphones.
You can chip away at this. I don’t know that the way to win or even fight this is outright rebellion, but I think if you slowly chip away at it, this might be the way to go.

I am not sure what that means yet fully, but that was the answer that came to me. I have been thinking about this a lot. You have to understand, these people will go out of their way to do just about anything to get to the target. Mess up construction projects that go months at a time. Moving into buildings, contacting all your customers, and if you are working with other, your business partners. Etc. They will try to be in control of every aspect of your life.

Eg. When I use to have the phone available with more easy access, they would have a variety of people call, but it would be at such specific times, that you knew it was on behalf of them, that constant need to make contact with the target. If you are not under observation it’s hard to understand this.

That seems to be the best solution. The ones that are inside, you need to find ways to chip away at it. Like a piece of rock. Doesn’t have to be big chunks, just little things over time. Eventually the rock will crumple. See this is what they use on us, but I have been thinking about it, and the same method, should work on them. I am just not sure what this truly means yet, but that’s the answer that came to me.

Anyways, so that was my question. How do they do it? How do they still criticize countries like China, and how could they have criticized countries like East Germany, when the same stuff was ongoing here, and in greater capacity?

Anyways it’s something to think about.

February 11, 2009 Posted by | activism, Awareness, Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Welcome to our worlds

After reading this article, it’s like all the pain and all the trauma of the last two years, just comes back.

Being in your home and being burnt for hours on end, and not knowing what was happening, or being able to do anything about it at first. Then realising that your fellow human beings were partaking in this, and were psychotically enjoying what was happening.

Trying to write to organizations such as Amnesty and others to get help, trying to other responsible agencies, not at first realising that you were the testing ground for something that was yet to come.

Being unable to prove in many cases what was happening, having only the word of other targets to back each other up, on what was being done to us, the violations that we were experiencing, that for the most part just went unheard, trying to explain to you the general public that these weapons existed and would someday be used on you. People just dismissing the idea as crazy without doing any research or investigation.
That someday might be closer than you think.

These things should not be used on anyone, in any capacity whatsoever. These things, these none lethal weapons are cruelty and they are torturous, and they should not be used on anyone. Of course as I have already documented, permission was granted to use the none portable kind on the people of Iraq over a year ago, and there have been horrible reports of bodies, burnt on the inside out.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2005-07-24-nonlethal-weapons_x.htm

The portable kind in small doses no doubt would be ok, but that will not be what happens. Just like with tasers they will be over used, and abused. The animals that were capable of remotely torturing myself and other Targeted Individuals for hours at a time, days at a time, months at a time, years at a time, will have no problem doing so to others.

The general public will just have to try to learn how to shield like many Targeted Individuals have had to learn to do.

Anyways it’s just a brief article, but it just reminded me of so much of what’s happened over the last two years.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16339-us-police-could-get-pain-beam-weapons.html

US police could get ‘pain beam’ weapons

[quote]The research arm of the US Department of Justice is working on two portable non-lethal weapons that inflict pain from a distance using beams of laser light or microwaves, with the intention of putting them into the hands of police to subdue suspects.

The two devices under development by the civilian National Institute of Justice both build on knowledge gained from the Pentagon’s controversial Active Denial System (ADS) – first demonstrated in public last year, which uses a 2-metre beam of short microwaves to heat up the outer layer of a person’s skin and cause pain.

‘Reduced injuries’

Like the ADS, the new portable devices will also heat the skin, but will have beams only a few centimetres across. They are designed to elicit what the Pentagon calls a “repel response” – a strong urge to escape from the beam.

A spokesperson for the National Institute for Justice likens the effect of the new devices to that of “blunt trauma” weapons such as rubber bullets, “But unlike blunt trauma devices, the injury should not be present. This research is looking to reduce the injuries to suspects,” they say.[/quote]

December 26, 2008 Posted by | Active Denial Weapons, Electronic harassment, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, High technology, Iraq | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment