Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Revamping the informants

Revamping the informants
(The informant system does not want to be sued)

The informant system and the study of it is truly interesting. also the informant system does not want to be sued. Recall, I first begun this journey, trying to discover what was happening and occurring to Targeted Individuals, and why they were being Gang Stalked. Upon discovering it was not ‘Vigilant Gangs’, or what have you, the investigation turned to the Threat Assessment Team files, informant system, agency operations, and Remote Neural Monitoring, Mind Control, Electronic Harassment. A world of light, and I do mean light research later, I am clear that there is so much more to this, some stuff, that can not be blogged about at this time, if ever. In the mean time, what can be blogged about is this, the informant system that is out there, as it relates to society as a whole, does need to be revamped.

There are legitimate situations occurring, such as, well this person has a marker, medium risk, and at this time we feel only to be seen or viewed in pairs. That situation, should only be for a specific amount of time, the person should be reviewed, and not deliberately provoked on an ongoing and reoccurring basis, to ‘keep the case, files going’. Such a waste.

The informant system in the background, and other sources are responsibly keeping such things going, deliberately provoking, banging into people, giving instructions to the local informants, who could be anyone, cause people are getting onto the actual informant system, for simple things, and then they do what they are advised or bidden to do, even if it’s harmful or detrimental to others. Tell lies, bang into others, accidents, and a thousand other perversities.
https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/rachel-hoffman-deadly-
dealings/

https://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/throwdown/
http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking09/Attica_Informants.html

http://www.snitching.org/2009/11/recruiting_new_informants.html

Agencies also play a deliberate role, some of which has been previously documented. I am going to post a clip from Control Factor, and then the case of John St Clair Akawi, Vs NASA,    Part2  then the DT Stockton documents, and you can read up a bit more about what individuals are capable of. Once a person is listed for monitoring, a variety of sources, can enter their situations, even without a Threat Assessment File, some have these situations ongoing. Part 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdyOOyUVopM

Control Factor. =In the movie he is speaking or talking about evoked potential, and how the human brain has been mapped, and how we can be manipulated, or controlled at a distance. This movie is worth watching, that is what can be mentioned. Please see previous articles, Robot Sentient Research Project.

Responsibility

I want these individuals, that are a part of these mini, conspiracies to be eligible to be in the incorrect situations, doing the incorrect things, meaning, I want them to be responsible for their actions. I also want a modicum of world peace, but that is unlikely to occur, or happen, at this moment. Instead, charging each person, and affecting them financially, when they are part of these mini conspiracies, isn’t the incorrect thing, but charging each informant, is a waste of space and time and energy. Most are just doing what their handler told them, or what the police chief told them, or what their parole officer told them, and so forth, and on, and on it goes. They take directions, primarily. So enable those giving the directions, to be a part of the process. Yes indeed. The handlers want to have them systemically destroying someone’s life, that’s fine, enable them to be included. Won’t want them to feel, left out.

The handlers can take individual responsibility, right back to the local informants, monitoring units, what have you. Then you can also at times go even one level deeper than the handlers, and sometimes, all too often that is where the problem lies, but that is also where the funding lies, and the means to continue these operations. If you can’t go after them morally, or ethically, and you can, but it takes time, go after them financially instead.

The revamp of these situations needs to occur. The laws can all be passed, but without reinforcement, laws at times are useless. Fines and penalties, might be the way to go. As it is now, these informants do the dirty, often what they are directed, then they get protected at times, other times they are asked to take the fall. It’s a serious waste of space.

Revamp the system, include the fee, fines, penalties, but then act on it. When the individuals giving the directions, the ones that are directly correlated, when they are exposed, asked to pay their fines, and fees, then maybe it will make sense.

That’s what I think needs to occur, that’s part of my feedback, and recommendation for this system.

July 7, 2013 Posted by | Awareness, CIA, Citizen Informants, Gang Stalking, Informants | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Happy New Year

I have been keeping busy, but happy New Year.

2013 is going to be a good year. I can tell by the vibe and the energy that surrounds it.

The craziness with the Gangstalking stuff is there in the background at times, but I would not have it be any other way.

For New Years I was going over the Jane Clift case. When I first came across the article, I had interestingly enough dismissed the articles as related, but different. I mean she was there, she had a notice in the mail advising her that she was on a Threat Assessment list, as medium risk only to be seen in pairs, and the length of time she would be on the list.

It was a few weeks later when I came back to the article, to this unrelated case is how I had phrased it, I recall being a bit annoyed, if it didn’t have anything to do with Gangstalking, and what was happening to us in the community, then I didn’t want anything to do with it.

In my usually scientific way of making discoveries, trying to think outside of the box, and so forth, I went back to her case, and looked at it from all angles, and it still didn’t make sense, but the moment I took away the letter she received, and factored in all that she was experiencing and going through, it was us in the community, it was a match. The sample once you excluded that one factor was a near perfect match. The more I read, I was sure that this was what I had been looking at and seeing.

Upon further research across the board, the scenario fit, and in most cases, there is no letter sent, the how people get onto such lists then fit in, and could be factored in. The individuals involved, and so forth, why family and friends went along with some aspects of this, the secrecy involved, and so forth.

The community has come a long way since those days, I have no question that this was what we were seeing, the illegal aspects that however go on behind the scenes can be mild to moderate, to involving external factors such as what was seen in the John St Clair Akawi case, but at least for the local stalking, monitoring a source could be listed, and targets could start to review or looking into these lists, see how they function, what’s behind some aspects of this, and then start to review the illegal aspects, such as described in the DT STockton report. All in all it’s come together over the years, and it’s been one of the most interesting times in human history because of it.

January 8, 2013 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment