Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

What’s in a name? Everything!

A boy named Adolf Hitler

This story has been ongoing for 3 years or more now, I am not sure if you are familiar with the particulars of the situation, so let me summerize, the Cambell’s had three children, they decided to take Adolf to the store for his birthday to get his name written on his birthday cake, the lady at the store refused, after she refused, they requested an apology, and that’s where the story begins, I wish that is where it had ended, but it isn’t.

I always recall this story, because to me it wasn’t about being white supremacists or not, it came down to something more core, more essential, the ability to name your children what you want to name them. If it is within reason, I think you should be eligible to name your children what you wish to name them. I believe this is what it came down to, and I think the fact that this situation went on this long speaks volumes about our society and how
controlled it is.

In the interum of this case, they brought in issue of abuse this, was there abuse, was it this type of situation, here, was it this type of situation there, but to me it came down to, what you can and can not name your children, and who has the capacity to step in and tell you what to do with them.–dont-kids-back.html#ixzz2WbOMT1LW

The parents who gave their children Nazi-inspired names say they were found not guilty of child abuse Tuesday though have yet to receive their children from protective custody

I recall this situation, because at the time 911 conspiracy was still ongoing, and they were wondering, if they started naming their kids ‘inside job’, was the state going to come and round them up? We are advised that to name the child Hitler was abusive, but like him or not, Adolf Hitler was a historical figure, will the same situation occur if you name your child Genghis Khan?

There have been many individuals throughout space, and time that we now like to regard as despots, evil, horrible people, but at the time, and even to their own culture, these people at the time might not have been regarded as such.

Now admittedly, because the family had tattoo’s, and possibly Nazi beliefs, this did not help, aid, or assist the situation, if the family in question were not white supremisis, and were let’s say of asian, african, or jewish decent, would this have caused as much of a contraversy, would it have been viewed the same way? How much control should the state really have over what you name your kids, and are entitled to name your kids.

The controversy is interesting, because at the time Adolf was likely a popular enough name, Hitler unknown, but before the History books wrote him in as a complete monster, and despot, I recall reading that he was actually popular  at one time.  What of individuals who have the name from back then, or someone who decides to take on the name innocently enough, can they expect to be in a similar situation, or have their children taken?

Through the 1930s the letters grow in number and Hitler received many before the elections in 1933. And he got thousands on his birthday.

What is your capacity as a parent, what are your rights? I think within reason, you should have the capacity to name your children what you wish. I would like to know that if you name your kid Ayatollah, (which means sign of God, Sign of Allah”) and even if you added the Khomeini, would your kids be taken, he was really contraversial in the 1980’s, and it’s something that could simply not have been done on American, or North American soil, but what if future generations wanted to, are those kids in jepordy as well?

I am personally fond of the name genghis khan, maybe even Alexander The Great, what about vengeance and a sword, one would be historically ok to name a child, and the other not? Is this the actually situation, are they going to come banging down your door if
you do choose such a name in future? Celebrities get away with choosing some of the most outlandish names I have ever seen, but most times they are not in danger of losing those children, or being accused of being abusive. I am not failing to see that the cambells were white supremisis, or that they hold specific belifs, but I was under the impression, that you could not take their kids, for those specific beliefs that they hold, but you know what, it seems as if the state did just that.

May we live in interesting times, because we already do.

June 18, 2013 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , | Leave a comment