Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Am I dangerous?

Am I dangerous?

Most people are not dangerous, until they are pushed, pulled, and bullied to the point of extinction or exhaustion, some will fold, but others will fight back, and when they do, that is when they are deemed as dangerous by some, but as fighters by others, it all depends on who you talk to.

I figure someone out there in cyberspace is wondering this very question.

How do I answer this? I guess it depends on who you ask or the situation at hand.

I can tell you that I am being made to look crazy or dangerous, but like most targets I am a normal person.

If targets are so normal why are we getting followed around? Well for my specific targeting, I noticed the surveillance shortly after I filed a complaint against an employer for harassment. Though I do believe my targeting began before this stage, this was when I noticed an escalation.

I now know that the harassment was deliberate. The reason it continued after changing jobs was due to the snitching friends network, and my colleagues were in many cases, asked to perform specific actions, or activities, which contributed to the harassment, but to them seemed normal. They never saw the bigger picture, and thus never got to understand the scope of the harassment, and thus only were privy to their portion of the deed. The death of a thousand paper cuts, one in and itself in most cases perfectly innocent, but the accumulation over time, perfectly harmful.

Making targets look crazy, deranged, dangerous, immoral, or corrupt is part of this game. To this end I have documented several instances of staged events designed to make it look as if I am mentally unstable.

Most of the staged events I have documented have been things such as informants acting crazy, or getting into altercations with others, and then the blame being pinned on me, cause I was in the area, or the RFID that is on my person was in the area. I have tested this enough to know that is exactly what is being attempted.

If placing individuals on lists was being done legitimately then why would such tactics be necessary?

I am as normal as anyone else, but my reactions to this situation that I find myself in is what will distinguish me from others. I have chosen to fight back. That for some will be seen as dangerous.

I am not fighting with guns, or knives but with truth. I guess for some this will be seen as dangerous. I am trying to expose a system that routinely destroys individuals such as myself. Innocent citizens who have done no wrong.

Like Mel Gibsons character in braveheart, or Helen Slaters character in Legend of Billie Jean, I am just fighting for my rights and the rights of others.

If you take a moment to find out what is happening to us, you will find it hard to contemplate at times, but it’s true.

I don’t think I am dangerous, but then I didn’t think that people like John Lennon, Martin Luther King Jr, or even Randy Weaver’s family of Ruby Ridge fame were dangerous, but the (Powers That Be) PTB saw them as a danger a threat.

Most of these people just wanted peace, to live and let live, but they were not allowed to do so. Cointelpro was used against both John Lennon and MLK, both were eventually assassinated. Randy Weaver for refusing to become an informant, had his wife, and son murdered. They were just normal people, trying to live a normal existence.

So in my world I am a fairly kind person, I value privacy, justice, and don’t see myself as dangerous, but in the right situation, I like to think that I could be. By this I mean I like to think that in the right situation, I would stand up for those that I care about, or those things that I care about, and be “considered” dangerous to those who were a threat to them. I like to think that I am joined in this sentiment by most sane rational, freedom loving people.

Dangerous? Depends on who you talk to. For those who have spent the last several years framing me in situation after situation to try to make me look crazy or dangerous, I hope that they are getting their money’s worth.

To those who have taken the time to know me, without falsely judging me, thank you for seeing the good in me.

So dangerous, it’s all in the mind of the beholder. Jesus came and he was a danger, not because he was dangerous, but because the truth he told was a threat to the system at the time, and much like history, they tried lies to destroy his character, called him crazy, said he had a demon, that he wanted to destroy the law and lot’s of other propaganda. He was a really special being. Loved children, cared for others, but the world could not appreciate him, and thus he was sacrificed and much like those who came after him, never fully appreciated by this system, this matrix that we are a part of.

I am not trying to be Jesus, I am just pointing out that even the most innocent person to corrupt minds, can be considered a danger, it all depends on who you talk to.

Am I dangerous? This is much like beauty in the eye of the beholder, is best answered in the mind of the beholder.

February 25, 2010 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The US vs John Lennon

I was really surprised after watching this movie. I know about the Beatles, and then I knew some things about John and Yoko Ono, but I had no idea about the full extent of his harassment by the US government.

This was a really eye opening movie. During my research into Gang Stalking I realised that John Lennon was just one more person who had complained about some of the things that Gang Stalking targets complain about. Wire taps, harassment, being followed around in public overtly by strangers, but I had no idea how much he was harassed.

I mean you think that he was famous, rich, etc and so he could avoid these problems, but that’s so far from the truth. When you watch this movie, it’s nothing like that, and the movie really humanizes him.

Apparently he became a real anti-war activist during the Vietnam war. That time period is a lot like this one except people protested back then, and we still protest now, but not as much. Music was allowed to have an influence, and now if you read the book “the covert war on rock,” it does not have that same chance that it once did.
He fought to stay in the US for 5 years. Apparently his very simple and innocent anti-war stance upset then president Nixon and he got the political machine in gear against Lennon and sought to destroy him. Like this machine constantly does, it looks for vulnerabilities and came up with an immigration rap. Sounds familiar. They were really trying to kick him out of the country for 5 years of his life. Finally he got fed up and he sued them. His lawyer thought that he didn’t have a chance in hell, but he was able to prove presidential interference in his affairs.

Then the Watergate scandal broke, Nixon resigned, and then him and Yoko and Sean had a semi normal family life, then he was assassinated.

The movie is pretty self explanatory and it matches the pattern that has been seen before. It’s really eye opening, because you think that people like Britney Spears, and other stars would be untouchable to things like this, but this just shows that they are not.

In many ways they are average and vulnerable like the rest of the population. I think we know that on some level, but this movie really put things into perspective.

Here are a couple of quotes from the movie that I found interesting. There are a few more, but these were interesting to me.

{One more thing about John Lennon, it seems off topic, but he reported that he saw a flying saucer, sounds out there, but in reading about other events that have been under surveillance, there was also another report of flying sauces over a rally that was most likely under surveillance, where they reported the same thing. He thought it was a something positive at the time, but it’s just something interesting to note.}
Direct quote from the movie.

“His activities were being monitored. He says that he thinks that they wanted him to notice. He was scared paranoid.”

“He believed all of his telephone conversations were being monitored.

He believed that he was being followed  around New York City.

He believed that friends that he had thought were friends were secret Informants for different intelligence communities. ”

“Another effect of the Sinclair thing was it probably further alerted the FBI, John Mitchell, Holdermin,  ?, and Nixon that something needed to be done to neutralize John Lennon. ”

 

“When it gets down to having to use violence then you are playing the systems games. The establishment irritates you, pull your beard and flick your face to make you fight, because once they have you violent then they know how to handle you. ”
It’s interesting that Markus Wolf takes credit for perfecting the concept of the Romeo Spy, but even as far as back then, it was not above the American government to implement the same techniques. Just a thought.

Anyways the movie is really good. The music in the movie really shows his progress as an artist. I understand a lot more about him now, and it’s a real eye opener. It shows that things did not change that much, they in fact seem to just have expanded the techniques and methods to others. It really puts things into perspective. At times when watching the movie, you could not help but juxtaposition what was happening in this era with the wars from that time period, Vietnam and Cambodia and anti-war movement, just interesting.

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=161

I had forgotten this, but even back then there was governmental cooperation, between Canada and the US in regards to spying on citizens. Along with the FBI, the RCMP in Canada were also spying on John Lennon.

[quote]The RCMP advised U.S. officials the radio programming was intended to help promote the planned Mosport event. The Mounties noted the venue had been vetoed by the Ontario Municipal Board and “at the present time it is not certain whether the ‘festival’ will proceed at some other location.”

The ambitious musical event collapsed under the weight of organizational disputes.

Lennon’s rabble-rousing activism of the early 1970s drew the attention of the FBI, which like the RCMP spied on numerous left-wing individuals and groups suspected of subversion.

A memo to the FBI director, noting enclosure of the RCMP correspondence, carries the subject line, “New Left – Foreign influence – Canada.”

The FBI records were released under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act in response to a request from California history professor Jon Wiener, who waged a long legal fight for disclosure. Some material in the FBI file remains classified.
attention.
[/quote]

Maybe all these countries did was invite more players to the game with their community policing programs and anti terror laws. The movie is worthwhile watching.

December 13, 2008 Posted by | Awareness, Beatles, CIA, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Cointelpro, community policing, Covert investigations, domestic spying, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, John Lennon, past, present, revolution, Spying, Stalking, Stasi, State target, Surveillence, Targeted Individual | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments