Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Down with the snitching

I am just sitting here thinking about some past jobs I have had and some encounters that I have had with the snitches.

Again some informants are not low lives, but many others are and since this started I have seen more of the low than I have of the high.

The goal of this stalking is to make targets look like they are crazy, or whatever lie you are trying to spread, or start with one and go to another.

Remember by the time Jiverly Wong died he was a divorced loser, who could not keep a job, who had a drug addiction and had tried to rob a bank. None of that seems to have been true, but it all survived him into his death, and it’s most likely what was being spread about him. On top of that he endured months of workplace mobbing, with slogans like “if it wrong it’s Wong”. Fun stuff.

After his company closed down and he got laid off, he tried to better himself in an English class, so he could get a better job, or find a job. He dropped out of the english class, and the indication is that he also expreienced mobbing there. Most targets do not want to be unemployed, but that is the perception that the agents of the state will try to give, to justify what is happening.

I am a fairly bright, articulate, and intelligent person. Somewhat independent and before this, a pretty high functioning person. I am still a pretty high functioning person, but now I am fighting against stuff most people only have nightmares about.

I am like targets of Cointelpro fighting against a system that will go to any and every extreme to bring me down. With Jiverly Wong I often wonder if Shopvac closed on it’s own via natural means, or if they had a hand in it. I am wondering because many targets talk about the construction projects that pop up all over the city where we are. They go on for years at a time. We are not paranoid in this. They seem capable and willing to go through any means necessary to take targets down. You see this with whistle-blowers and others.

I know others who have experienced, having companies close soon after the target was going to be working there. Or in other cases, if they were trying to work with companies who specialised in products to be delivered the company stopped providing the function.

Anyways at my jobs since I have been a target, the idea is to get me fired from every job, make me look crazy or inefficient. To that end, the informants where I live, they are allowed to use a radar gun, or something that produces large amounts of heat, or other things that cause vibrations in my home, to heat up my skin, to heat up my body, to try to make sure that I am sleep deprived and unable to function.

Most times I can now overcome this, but it’s a process. For much of the last few years, because of what is happening with having a variety of weapons used on me in my home, I sometimes function on less sleep than the average person. Many targets get only a few hours sleep every night for months, because they can’t stay in one position for very long, and they constantly change positions, trying to not be burnt, or tortured.

I have had trouble with jobs over the last few years. Before this my records with keeping jobs is perfect. I lasted at most for years at a time, and left when I choose to.

I experienced workplace mobbing, and when it got extreme, like many other targets, I used vacation and other absent time to try to cope, but beyond that, a pretty good worker.

The other obstacle is that targets in the workplace have informants who are trying to get us to lose our jobs. I relayed the story of one group that I dealt with who went to my manager after I decided to move away from them, due to tactics like logging me out of my phone on breaks, to try to make it look like I was not punching out of the phones on breaks, which is a no no. After fun little things like that, I decided to move away from this group, who later when to my manager and advised that I was being unfriendly to them. Well this got me written up, and my manager telling me to be more friendly to them. I was, I told them that if they had anything work related they could feel free to approach me, but beyond that not so much. This was their attempt in my opinion to get me in trouble or fired from my job.

This don’t come to me unless it’s work related thing worked great, till one of the persons in that same group was able to get the biotch he was banging to get me fired from the the job anyways. It might have been indirect, but the results were the same. The biotch he was banging got her manager friends from what I heard to help get me fired.

I ran into these two some time later on separate occasions, and what do you really say to people like that? I mean do you say hey, thanks for getting me fired from my job? No you just ignore them. You just look at them and walk off. Leave them to comfort each other, knowing how unpleasant the strain of it all must have been for them, I mean having to run into the person you helped get fired, oh the trauma of it all, for them. Anyways, I am sure in some other dimension we are all BFF’s (Best Friends Forever) not. The chances are good that if people like that made your life hell here, they are likely to make your life hell in some other dimension, equally so or 1000 times more. If you believe in that stuff.

What I do notice is this, you always have specific people who are doing the same roles that I noticed on the train. So even though it’s been two years plus since I had any sensitivity, you still get the informants who try to make it look like I am sensitity. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that any incidents reported in the last over two years saying that I still have a sensitivify is a blatant lie. Yet every job I get, or on the street, they still try to fish. What I am wondering is, what is the legal period of time, that these governments can do this for? What are the paramators? What is the limitation and the scope? Are they just allowed to fish forever? Come on people, this might be a good angle to look into.

There is no governing body, that is why you could have them fuc* with people’s lives like Kimveer Gill, and Jiverly Wong for years at a time. They could do anything that they wanted to, and there was no governing body to intervene. Also since these two did not know exactly what was happening, it must have been so bad. Kimveer knew he was under investigation, and Jiverly knew the cops were involved, but I don’t think either had every found a Gang Stalking website, which is too bad. They might have found a supportive community and a way to deal with what was ongoing. people to talk to. I know Kimveer turned to the goth community, but that’s not the same thing, cause he was not able to openly discuss what was happening. There are just posting here and there. I find often that only another target, can acturally understand what I am going through, most people just can’t get their minds fully around it.

Anyways, so there will be informants where you work, and the only job of these under police controlled snitches will be to get you fired, or to make you look bad. So usually you get people trying to play with the phone logs, or finding other ways to try to make you look bad. Computer security at work becomes important. Do not put anything that is opened in the fridge. I don’t have to tell you that.

You are going to get a conductor, someone who co-ordinats the harassments and looks for reactions. Then you will get someone or usually many snitches that are going to be told, that they must do X Y Z. So if you are being framed to look like a racist, they will try to get you to say racist things, or if you are being made to look like a pervert, they will bring in mags, or engage in other conversation, if it’s crazy with a sensitivity, they will be told to perform the sensitivity throughout the day with someone observing your reactions. If the person observing your reactions, or doing the sensitivity are police controlled informants, then you have a problem, because then they follow the official agenda, and a second agenda given to them by their handlers. (These types of police controlled informants, do not belong in these types of investigations, because they will have a secondary agenda, always.) The regular informants are fine, but these types, are designed to get you fired from your job, or to portray you, however the handler, and those conducting the investigation see fit.

Many of them will also be example in difficult situations, I get a lot of people in immigration situations, or all races. Others in money situations, anything like this, and people will do desperate things. It’s how the Stasi worked, and it’s how our government now works. If they are holding something over these people, it makes them dangerous, and they will do whatever their handlers tell them to do. The image of Jiverly Wong being a loser, drug user, etc, did not maintain itself, it had lot’s of help.

Over the last few years, crazy has been the main thing to try to portray me as. Oh and a loser who can’t hold a job. Well when someone is allowed to try to keep you awake and sleep deprived for months and years at a time, and sometimes you are getting 3 hours sleep, because you become hypersensitive, then it’s easy to make someone miss work, or perform badly. I could probably do it, and in less time to the informants. I have worked well under the conditions that have been given to me. I have not yet excelled the way that I am accustomed, but sometimes surviving is the key. I want to do more than survive however.

If I can help other targets to get through this, to not kill themselves, or others, to not wind up in the mental ward, or jail, to not be portrayed as whatever, then I am doing a part of what I am meant to do.

I am awake right now, cause they again switched what they were doing, to try to keep me awake at nights and sleep deprived, so I have to fix this, and then get on with it. With this targeting, only another target can understand at times what is happening. Most people do not understand the concept that this is torture. The sleep deprivation, the being burnt with lasers, radar guns, other electronic weaponry, or directed energy weapons. They don’t understand what it’s like to have someone rewire the electricity in your home, so that the walls are dancing with electricity. They did this recently and it was so bad, the windows were shaking in my home. When you touched the walls, they were just vibrating, you can do this by messing with the electricity and rewiring, but it’s illegal. Yet informants do this stuff all the time, because the police controlled ones do anything that their handlers tell them to.

Remember the Cathrine Johnson case, she was 90, and they broke down her door and shot her. Well they planted drugs in her home, and they claimed that the informant had bought drugs there, well killing an innocent old woman was even more than the informant could handle and he  told the press, that no, that was a lie, and the cops in that case were put in jail, but they do this all the time. The controlled informants should not be allowed to interact with targets. They in many cases have no integrity. (Not all cases, some people will always have integrity.) The problem is you have people like Rachel Hoffman, who get desperate, and agree to desperate things, or do desperate things to others so that they can survive, it becomes a game of eat or be eaten, and it creates a nasty society. It’s not right. The results are what you see, and the events that consistently unfold.

Even the informants who get the white glove treatment, like the ones who are paid to spy, they can get corrupted by the money being thrown at them. Got a tip about the employee you are working with? Are you sure they didn’t say something racist? Are you sure they didn’t hint at liking kidddy porn? Are you sure they didn’t react to the sensitivity? Etc. It’s not hard to get someone to lie, and they do.

Then there are the honest mistakes. People who thought or are so paranoid that they make faulty judgements. The informants are not professionals, and even under the best conditions professionals make mistakes, well in many cases, I have sat there, while they think someone else is the target, and just watched them, trying to provoke the person, and it’s horrible, because they are so convinced the person A is crazy, they will see crazy. I have had them sit there looking at someone who was not the target, and then they are like oh did you see that, or they indicate it, yeah because normal action is now crazy. I just smile and nod, or smile and do nothing. I think of the times, that my normal actions must have been like, oh the the target did that, and the retelling was exaggerated, or just fabricated, not even deliberately, but many of them get so caught up, they just make bad assessments.

They are a fascinating study. In my opinion, the police controlled informants should not be in the workplaces doing the assessments on targets, because you will get corrupted results. People in immigration situations, or money situations, or other situations where something is being held on them, should not be in these roles, because you will get corrupted results, but just like with the Stasi, that’s the idea.

So the goal of these people is to make me look like a crazy person, who can’t keep a job, who might be into drugs, who is now racist. (Yeah I am shocked by the last bit, but apparently if you research extremist sites, not post anything mind you, but just research that is enough for a fishing expedition.) These people are corrupt and you have to stay up to date on their every move.

Even when you try to explain this to the society at large, they don’t care. They are the first ones to insult, and judge the Kimveers Gill’s, and Jiverly Wong’s of this world, as pycho, but they take no ownership for their roles in creating these psycho’s. Society has a responsibility to take ownership for what is happening and to try to help prevent it. Many people can take a role in making sure some of these reforms and recommendations happen, not just for our safety, but for the safety of society.

Also next time, I will go over the pattern of the Manchurian Target. Someone who is not mind controlled, but who is targeted and groomed to the stage where the state knows that they could snap, and then they use them like we saw in the Jiverly Wong situation. As a target I can’t go to the bathroom without them knowing, yet Jiverly Wong, who owns guns, and uses them regularly, who had just lost his job, dropped out of the english language school, entered a place he had dropped out of, first parking his car in the back, and was then went into the front of the building, yet no one was on hand to stop him? Really, and there are reports that the news copters were in the sky very quickly, and the info about when the 911 call was made. Anyways it might be something worth looking into.
 Was this event allowed to happen? Remember the killing sprees were going to be used, to get gun laws passed, but well let’s just say the more we highlight the ongoing agenda, the better chance we have of slowing it down, and who knows, maybe stopping it.

June 24, 2009 Posted by | Gang Stalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Britney Spears Prisoner?

I have been following up on the Britney Spears situation, so this post goes out to the people who know her and might actually be in a situation to assist her.

I don’t like to speculate about the lives of celebrities, but we are told Britney is all healed up right? She is back on stage singing provocative songs like F.U.C.K ME (If you seek Amy) and other numbers. Her body is back in shape and she is on tour. Things are fine right?
The problem is I don’t know that things are fine. Britney who fought for custody of her boys, even going so far as to have an armed standoff with the police to keep them with her gave up custody of the boys last year. Kevin Federline now has sole custody and Britney has visitation rights, sort of.
http://www.usmagazine.com/britney-spears-gives-kevin-federline-sole-custody-of-boys
[quote]Spears currently has monitored, twice-a-week visitation with her boys, as well as one overnight-a-week.

She lost all visitation rights in January she was hospitalized at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.[/quote]

Twice a week supervised visitation. and one overnight a week, which I imagine is also supervised?
Britney does not have control of her own money. She is well enough to perform like a trained doll in front of the audience, but she is not well enough to have control of her money? Shouldn’t people be asking questions about this?
http://www.usmagazine.com/news/lawyer-britney-spears-compares-dads-control-to-prison-200914
[quote]Britney Spears’ life under her dad’s conservatorship is like “prison,” a lawyer for her former manager, Sam Lutfi, charged today in a hearing at L.A. Superior Court.

John Anderson testified he was contacted by another lawyer, John Eardley, to represent Britney in her fight against the conservatorship (which gives Jamie Spears control over her personal and financial affairs). He also says Jamie’s control is causing the singer “emotional distress [that is ongoing] now.”[/quote]
I hate that picture of her. The look does not suit.
http://home.nzcity.co.nz/news/article.aspx?id=99538&fm=newsmain,nrhl
[quote]Jamie filed for a restraining order against both men earlier this year, claiming they had harassed Britney, 27.

The ruling follows evidence given by Jamie and Britney’s hairstylist and bodyguard, who all claimed the ‘Womanizer’ singer was scared of Lutfi.

Last month, Britney’s former boyfriend paparazzi photographer Adnan Ghalib was also given a three-year restraining order barring him from seeing the star.
[/quote]

So based on the word of her dad, and a hair dresser, Britney Spears who is 27 years old, almost 30 has no say in who can come near her, and she has no control of her money. Yet she is ok enough to be prancing around on stage like a blank doll?
This next bit I found really worrisome.

http://snarkfood.com/britney-spears-wanted-sam-lufti-to-rescue-her-from-daddy/
[quote]
    “[Britney] told me she wanted to get a hold of Sam,” said Christina, 25, whose brother had once been Spears’s manager. “She wanted him to help her find a lawyer, and wanted someone to get a prepaid cell phone to her. She was scared because her father was blackmailing her with visitation rights over her kids.”
    Spears allegedly told Christina to meet her on the fifth floor gym of the Peninsula Hotel on Jan. 16. When Christina arrived, Spears was working out with her mother while a bodyguard stood nearby. But they rendezvoused in a sauna where Christina gave her a phone, saying it was from Sam and ex-boyfriend Adnan Ghalib, which Spears then hid in a locker. “She asked me, ‘Will Sam be able to help me?’” Christina added.

The phone, however, was later discovered by Spears’s security team and confiscated from her purse.

[/quote]

The next thing I found really worrisome is that he lawyer was being kept away from her. I had been keeping an eye on Britney, because he meltdown and the events around it, made me think she might not be crazy, but a targeted individual made to look crazy. The scary part is if it’s true, it means someone with the fame, fortune and celebrity of Britney could have this happen to her.

Remember at her low point she had the kids taken from her, her money, and she was locked away. Also those who might have been trying to help her, were kept away from her. What can someone under those conditions do? Yet she has millions of fans, and none of them are asking the questions, or putting together a free Britney site on facebook? At the very least Britney is a grown adult who’s life is being controlled by forces outside of her control, and those paying to see her parade on stage should ask themselves why? If she is well enough to perform like a trained doll why is she not well enough to be in charge of her own money and life? Why is her lawyer being kept from her?
Don’t forget that those bodyguards that her dad hired still control her movements. This should worry a lot of people, but it doesn’t. All those so called screaming and adoring fans, should be all over this and asking some real questions.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090428/entertainment/us_people_britney_spears_1
[quote]
as ordered Britney Spears’ former manager and a lawyer to stay away from the pop singer for the next three years.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aviva Bobb issued her ruling Tuesday after hearing testimony and arguments in recent weeks from the men and lawyers for Spears’ father, Jamie.
[/quote]

Her lawyer now has to stay away from her? Was the judge paid off? Does he know something that we don’t know?

[quote]Lawyers for Lutfi and Eardley promised to appeal the ruling, saying the lengthy hearing didn’t prove the singer suffered substantial emotional distress as a result of the men’s actions.

Lutfi’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, said evidence instead pointed to Spears asking his client for help.

“Never before in the history of the world has a restraining order been issued against someone who merely responded to cries for help,” Freedman said. [/quote]
I find it odd as well. Why can’t the lawyer challenge the fact that someone is in control of Britney’s life other than Britney?
[quote]Freedman said the conservatorship was misusing a statute meant for the elderly or severely disabled adults to protect a singer who is currently on an international concert tour.

The singer remains on a tour promoting her most recent album, “Circus.” She did not appear during hearings on the petitions, despite repeated requests by Lutfi and Eardley’s lawyers to have the singer testify.

Her life remains closely managed by her father, who can restrict her contact with outsiders and controls her access to a cell phone. [/quote]
Britney not asked or rather not allowed to testify? Does this seem shady to anyone else? Yet all these people claim to be her fans. They all go to her shows, but they don’t question the fact that she might be in serious trouble and being held captive by her Dad?

She according to sources, does not have access to cellphones, the bodyguards watch her every move. She can be on tour, but not in control of her own money? Any nobody questions this?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/article2341438.ece

[quote]
The singer has sent a barrage of text messages to Adnan begging him to help her get out of living under the control of her father.

But Ghalib, 36, is unable to reply because he has been ordered by a judge not to communicate with Britney for three years.

A source said: “She keeps sneaking messages to Adnan begging him to help her win back her freedom.

“She says she is lonely and misses being able to date the men she chooses. She feels trapped.

“She has been begging him to meet her and help her come up with a plan to get out of her dad’s conservatorship.

“Some messages have got back to her via her hairdressers and style team – but Adnan cannot contact her otherwise he will face jail.”
[/quote]
Add to this the fact that Adnan is in some bizarre trouble. As I was following up on his story, it sounds like he is being provoked. Now he is being threatened with deportation, for allegedly hitting or driving at one of those people who sound like they were helping to keep him away from Britney.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1161420/Britneys-ex-Adnan-Ghalib-faces-deportation-Afghanistan-guilty-assault-charges.html
[quote]Ghalib, 36, is charged with assault with a deadly weapon, hit-and-run and battery.

The charges relate to an incident on 11 February in Los Angeles when a court official tried to serve him with a restraining order to stay away from Britney.

The restraining order was issued by the singer’s father, Jamie Spears, who has taken control of her affairs.

Ghalib allegedly tried to run over the court official – the charge of use of a deadly weapon relates to his car.

The photographer moved to Birmingham from Afghanistan with his family when he was five years old, and he works in the US.[/quote]

I also find it interesting that her new album is called blackout.
If Britney is in trouble, then it sounds like they are trying to remove the people from her life who could help her. If her dad really is keeping her a virtual prisoner, and it’s possible, then we need to hear from Britney, but it does not sound like she is free to state her case.

Under the circumstances what can she do? I don’t think it’s up to her, I think it’s up to the so called fans who claim to love her, and who buy the tickets to her show, to ask questions. To wonder why lawyers are being kept away from her, lawyers who claim she is a virtual prisoner to her dads control. Why she can be on some tour, but not have full access to the money she is making from those tours. Why a 27 year old woman, has to have bodyguards choosen by her dad wherever she goes. I think her fans have to ask if Adnan or even Lufti could be telling the truth and if so what does that mean for Britney, who they claim to love so much.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaCteNxtzfM

http://www.actressarchives.com/news.php?id=15542

[quote]Yesterday we reported that a woman who is believed to be Britney left a voice message with her lawyer, asking what happens to her custody agreement if her father’s conservatorship is ended. Expect Britney Spears to start fighting back like never before in the coming months. And expect it to be a “circus” of its very own. [/quote]
[quote]Hi my name’s Britney Spears. I called you earlier. I’m calling again because I just wanted to make sure that during the process of eliminating the conservatorship that my father has threatened me several times, you know, he’ll take my children away.  I just want to be guaranteed that everything will be fine with the process of you guys taking care of everything that things will stay the same as far as my custodial time.
That’s it, bye.[/quote]
If that voicemail is Britney then as late as March she was asking for help. People seem to be just walking around in a maze. It is possible that she is in trouble, and if she is really asking for help, then her fans, so called fans could go a long way towards ensuring that there is enough light shone on the situation to help her get the assistance that she needs.

 

http://news.celebritywonder.com/2009/04/02/Prisoner_Britney_Spears.html

 

There is no denying that Britney made some bad choices on her own, but what’s ongoing now sounds very worrisome, and it would be good if her fans would look into it on her behalf.

 

 
http://www.celebuzz.com/video-britney-spears-feels-like-s65111/

[quote]”I think it’s too in control. If I wasn’t under the restraints I’m under, I’d feel so liberated. When I tell them the way I feel, it’s like they hear but they’re really not listening. If you do something wrong in your work, you can move on, but I’m having to pay for a long time. I never wanted to become one of those prisoner people. I always wanted to feel free.”

MTV’s For the Record airs Sunday, November 30, at 10 p.m.[/quote]

April 30, 2009 Posted by | Awareness, Baiting, Britney Spears, BritneySpears, Conspiracy, control, crazy | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Set Up’s

In researching Gang Stalking I have had to focus on how Informants are used. What I am finding is that Informants are an integral part of society, they are used at every level, and are an ingrained feature of some societies and have been for some time. The other aspect of the Informant system that I am coming across is one that many would describe as conspirital. This involves the use of Informants to set up average individuals themselves to become Informants.

These set up’s can happen for drugs, illegal materials, sexual assault accusations, pedophilia accusations, getting friends to steal from stores, stolen goods, embarrassing or compromising situations, illegal or immoral situations that are covered up, there are so many different ways the Informant is used for these set up’s. The unsuspecting target or pawn might never suspect that cousin Ed, that old friend, neighbour, co-worker is calling out of the blue not to get reacquainted, but to try to help set you up.
http://www.flexyourrights.org/rachel_hoffman#comment-6520
 
Quote:

the unethical recruitment of drug informants
Submitted by bobbie (not verified) on September 19, 2008 – 4:34am.

[quote]My son was targeted by local law enforcement simply because they valued him as a potential drug informant.

They were interested in him because he did construction work for someone who had a permit to grow marijuana plants.

He had no drug violations. The detectives targeted his specific vulnerabilities, and played on his sympathy with an older informant who said he was going through a bad divorce, and needed marijuana for his anxiety.

The 4 detectives witnessed and videotaped the sale, but did not arrest him. They waited until he reported for a scheduled jail time for a DUI, and rearrested him without publicity, and without family support.

They told him he was “screwed”, and would he work for them? When he didn’t want to consent without talking with his girlfriend, they went after her at work and threatened to prosecute her. He pleaded guilty and got 2 years prison, leaving his 8 yr old son without a dad. Please take a stand against this unethical activity.[/quote]
These systemic setup’s have been going on for many years unchecked. The above example should be helpful in comprehending how these set up’s are being conducted. If you think there is no such thing as a conspiracy in society you would be wrong.

The local law enforcement wanted this woman’s son as an informant. I am not sure if they asked him first, but most likely they just created a scenario where a set up could happen.

They were not really interested in her son, the true target was his employer, look at the steps they went through to get to this person.

1. They profiled her son, to figure out what his vulnerability would be.

2. They hired an Informant who had access to her son. It’s hard to say if they set up the Informant first or not.

3. They used the Informant to entrap her son, assuming that he would become a snitch.

4. Had they been successful, it would have been a matter of time before this woman’s son would have been asked to either set up his employer, or do something to make him look guilty and set him up in that manner.
That’s the way it’s working, and has been for some time now. This happens in society a lot. It’s systemic. If you don’t think this way, operate this way, you might not know it when you see it, or experience it.

The above scenario is what we call a conspiracy, and that one was initiated by local law enforcement. In my readings and research this is not a one time thing, these setup’s are happening all the time, and at every level and sector of society. Some on the record, many off the record, but the end result is the same, these people are owned by the system and can be used later on as needed.
Here is a made up scenario of a set up. A local politician is the target. There is no access to this person directly. He has a secretary, who after profiling her, she turns up clean, and there is no way to her directly, but Ms. secretary has a son, who’s not that bright. He get’s set up, the mother get’s involved and has a choice of helping her son stay out of jail, or turning Informant. She agrees, thus giving TPTB access to the politician and and opportunity to gain access to this person, or introduce others into his realm, so that he in turn can be set up. Provided all goes as planned, this politician will then be a part of the system. There might not be any official records of this, but each will be owned by the state. That’s a set up.
In a scenario like the one above, this person can then be used, if a policy needs to be voted on a specific way, etc.

In society there are similar scenarios working happening all the time, many less complex that are just person to person, drugs being the most common.
Many in society are not immune to drugs, or getting arrested for drugs, as we saw recently with the arrest of Sarah Palin’s in-law.
http://newsok.com/mother-of-bristol-palins-boyfriend-arrested/article/3331499
[quote]
Alaska state police have arrested the mother of Bristol Palin’s boyfriend on drug charges. Palin is the daughter of Gov. Sarah Palin.

Sherry L. Johnston was arrested Thursday after officers served a search warrant on a Wasilla home. The 42-year-old Johnston has been charged with six felony drug counts.
[/quote]
In this review of the book Snitch Culture, Jim Redden focuses on the use of Informants, and how pervasive the practise has become. The book was written almost a decade ago, but has become even more relevant then ever, in today’s modern society.
[quote]As American enters the New Millennium, this country is in the grip of a government-created surveillance system which permeates every aspect of our lives. The economy is booming and things couldn¹t be better for the vast majority of citizens. Serious crime is at a 30-year low, with murder and other violent felonies dropping in every region of the nation. Minorities are earning more than ever before, and the schools have never been safer. And yet, despite this good news, large segments of the population live in fear – a fear created and exploited by opportunistic politicians and power-hungry law enforcement officials to justify the most sophisticated police state ever created.

And at the heart of this nightmare is the snitch, the government’s weapon of choice against criminals and law-abiding citizens alike. [/quote]
This is the true evil of this system. Many people in society assume that if you follow the law, if you are law abiding, then this does not apply to you, after reading through many stories I see that this is not the case. You can be affected and are more likely at some point to be affected by this system if you are not aware of how it’s working.

 
[quote]
Such tips can trigger a broad range of responses by federal, state and local authorities, from home visits by child care and mental health specialists to deadly raids by heavily-armed SWAT units. Governments have spent billions of dollars in recent years militarizing local police departments across the country, and creating special federal units with overwhelming firepower. They are all ready and waiting for an informant to send them on their next mission. The result of all this snitching has been boiled down to a simple bumpersticker that can be seen on cars and trucks in all 50 state: “I love my country, but fear my government.”

The Snitch Culture did not come about by accident. It was deliberately created by Democrats and Republicans alike, working with federal, state and local law enforcement officials to build a nationwide intelligence-gathering network which is impossible to escape. This surveillance system did not spring to life overnight. It was assembled in pieces over the past century in reaction to one manufactured threat to the American way of life after another, each requiring new laws, new law enforcement agencies, and new informants to enforce. Our political and law enforcement leaders repeatedly seize on bizarre but isolated incidents to create the image of a country under attack from all sides. The threats have ranged over the years from anarchists to marijuana to Communists to heroin to Muslims to methamphetamine to white supremacists, but in each case the government¹s response has been the same – a new domestic war. The War on Crime. The War on Drugs. The War on Terrorism. The War on Youth Violence.[/quote]
Many in society myself included believe that wars on drugs, gangs were for the betterment of society, but in reality there seems to have been a different and separate agenda working. Something far more sinister that many are not willing to believe or accept. 
[quote]The result is a society driven by manufactured mass paranoia, where personal betrayal is seen as a virtue instead of the lowest form of human behavior. And as the 21st Century begins to unfold, this perverse version of reality is being exported around the world. Seamless global surveillance is the ultimate goal. All it takes is a tip from a snitch to make you a target.[/quote]
Before my research into Gang Stalking, I really believed that if you called in a tip to the police it would be quickly and properly investigated and the person if innocent would be cleared, but as we have seen with the war on terror, this is not the case, many innocent people are having their lives ruined. Most people never see the end result of what is set in motion after a tip is made. Many others are all too aware of the events that will be set in motion and are all too happy to partake in the ruin of an innocent persons life.
What can be done to correct what is happening? Exposure and awareness are key, but also societies mentality has changed. Many in society glorify snitching, many people think that it’s ok to set someone up, too many are unaware, or unwilling to believe how prevalent the Informant system is.

These are some of the key changes that would be required to correct a system that has become corrupt in too many societies.

Laws that require all Informants no matter who they are to be registered as such, at every level in society.

Record all Informant deals. It’s the only way to get a true record of who is an Informant and how wide spread the Informant Infection has become in society.

Do I expect the above changes to be implemented? Not really, but these are the scenarios that would help stop much of the corruption that we see, and are experiencing at many levels of society today.

The only real way then that an individual can affect change is to just say no. When they get into a situation where they are asked to snitch for unjust reasons, or for unethical set up’s, the best way to change what is happening in society is to just say no.

December 27, 2008 Posted by | Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Conspiracy, control, Controlled society, Corruption, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments