Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Zero tolerance rules to be reviewed.

Zero tolerance to be repelled, but what will be in it’s wake?

I want to be cheerful and happy that enough light, court cases, or cries for justice have been brought to this very discriminatory policy, but like others I will hold my breath and wait and see.

The Safe Schools Act, also known as zero tolerance, which some say [quote]unfairly targets black youth and drives them into gangs.

It not only targets black youths and drives them into gangs, but then when the police raid those very same gangs, they covert many of these young people into their slave army of snitches, so if they are not a part of one gang they are a part of another gang. The last seven years has given the state and endless supply of young slaves who have no choice but to snitch for the state, and when they try to leave the State gang their punishment is just the same, either jail if they are lucky, or being gunned down on the street, because they realised that they were nothing better than slaves for these programs.

Still the fact that this racist and discriminatory program is finally under review is something to be hopeful about, but people need to be vigilante. They can’t think that just because this program is under review, another will not come into affect to take it’s place. Remember the effects of this program have given the state an endless supply of forced snitches, who then make sure the State do not have to hire enough police or others to keep an eye on communities, because these kids are then used in the monitoring and spying as extensions of the state.
[quote]”You have kids who are expelled for accidentally touching someone, you have kids who are expelled for stealing pop and chips,” he said. “It criminalizes them and it diminishes their choices. Those kids are not going to be able to go to university or college.”[/quote]

The idea is to criminalise them and diminish their choices, because then you have them, exactly where you want them. Parents need to do their part too, even if you are working two jobs to get by, and this program or one similar to it goes after your children, you need to make sure they finish their education online, and find some way to keep them on course. It’s no accident who was targeted by this program, and it’s no accident that so many kids were caught up in the sneer of this program.
[quote]Worse, Pieters said those students often fall into the hands of gangs – something that has led the Safe Schools Act to be called the “gang recruitment act.”[/quote]

Gangs who are increasingly being controlled by the state snitch force? Because after they are arrested for the illegal drugs and guns, which children have no network of getting their hands on without influence, they are then propelled into the other system. See how it’s working?
[quote]While some members of the Conservative caucus urged the Liberals not to “throw the baby out with the bath water,” Conservative Leader John Tory admitted the act needs some tweaking.

“We have to find better ways than expulsion to deal with young people who have got into trouble in school,” he said. “If you expel them from school and say that’s it, you have almost inevitably destined them to a fate that is going to be trouble for the rest of their lives.”[/quote]

Only because so many articles have been written on this and so many parents have fought with you all and taken you to task on this, or else you would continue doing this. Of course this needs to be reviewed, because it’s not working, and you are causing more problems in society than you are fixing with this act.
[quote]But NDP Leader Howard Hampton said the Liberals have had almost four years to make these changes while the act discriminated against visible minorities and low-income students.

“The evidence has been there for three-and-a-half years,” he said. “This is like another promise from the government on the eve of an election when they have, in fact, done nothing.”[/quote]

It’s true, this was implemented by the Tory government, and what else could you expect? However the liberal government did have years to fix this and choose not to. It says a lot about the people that are being voted in, and the things that that they care about or rather don’t care about and that would seem to be your children.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t seem to matter which party is in power, because anyone of them could have had this amended. At the end of the day, parents need to be watchful and vigilant, you can no longer assume that your child will be treated in an equal, fair or unbiased manner, by the school or the state and it’s policies. You have to be more vigilant and you have to find workarounds for your children, the cards are deliberately stacked against them and for a reason. This program was working for someone and that is why it’s still in place.

It’s good to see them reviewing the program, but I wait to see what will replace it, or if any real changes will come about because of the spotlight brought to it. Policies are just words, the people with the mentality who were enforcing the programs will still be in the schools and will still find a way to get your kids kicked out and on the wrong path, that does not lead to success. Parents still have to be the beacon that finds a way for their children to succeed, now more than ever.

April 12, 2007 - Posted by | Bullying, Cultural diversity and multiculturalism, discrimination, harassment, Laws, metropolitan police, New World Order, NWO, Politics, Snitches, society, zero tollerance


  1. Community policing / COPS – community oriented policing.

    1. zero accountability + decentralized(no oversight) = corruption
    2. harass the victim for years
    3. Setup victims by fabricating crime/nuisance to local police.

    google “community policing COPS corruption”

    Community oriented policing is the foundation of GANG STALKING.

    Comment by T | July 15, 2009 | Reply

    • Hi T,

      Have you been to the Gang Stalking World website? Community Policing is covered and the role that it plays but yes you are partially right. Look up agenda 21

      Nikki Raapana explains Communitarianism below. There are also excellent mp3 audio links to more information and website links. Information on Amitai Etzioni (b. Werner Falk, 4 January 1929, Cologne, Germany)

      Also see docs for C.O.P.S.- Community Oriented Policing which is connected to Communitarianism.

      What Is A Communitarian? by Niki Raapana

      Communitarians believe that all neighborhoods should be governed like Chinese collectives. They teach that mandatory volunteerism in the community is a moral obligation of all citizens, and that intervening and reporting on your neighbors is required to maintain their individual freedom.

      It may sound like two conflicting ideologies, but it’s not. Communitarianism balances all political conflicts into one master, ideological solution.

      The obscure term was introduced to the world in the 1990’s, but it was actually created at the same time Marx and Engel drafted the anti-thesis to capitalism, called communism. In 1848, the Communist Manifesto established the rules for the “constant conflict” between British-European merchant “slavery” versus downtrodden workers, peasants, and serfs. In 1776, 90% of the American colonials were small private landowners, not downtrodden serfs, and the African slave trade was dominated by elites.
      The capitalism of Marx’s economic theory of Dialectical Materialism was never the capitalism of American free men.

      Exploitation of the masses was not originally an American ideal. American revolutionaries fought against the Imperial global financial scheme, and upon winning their freedom they created state governments to protect the individual property of the common man, and a federal government to protect the rights of the individual states.

      Over the years, thanks to a constant barrage of propaganda and outright lies, the conflict came to be represented by individualistic corporate capitalism on the right, versus the rights of the common good on the left, and protecting the common man was relegated down into selfishness.

      The conflict between capitalism and communism was never authentic, and based on a false conflict, the communitarian solution was planned as the final move of the Marxist theoretical revolutionary economic game equation. Designed to change the world, the stated goal of the Marxists was to promote global conflicts, create chaos and disorder, and offer up a predetermined evolved society, benevolently ruled exclusively by them.

      Communitarianism is human society’s most developed Darwinian geopolitical ideology in the theoretical, “natural” Marxist evolution of social systems. Which means, in plain American, that communitarians made up a science and made up a language to define it, but don’t worry, you can trust them because they’re really smart scientists who help helpless uneducated normal people be safe from bad things. They differ in their beliefs as to the type of force that should be used against immoral neighbors (some advance shame while others advance “boot camps”), but they all share the same belief that Earth’s scientists have an obligation to guide humanity into achieving a less violent, livable quality of life.

      A Communitarian is an academic elitist privy to the solution, and their position in the New World Order is one of the best-kept secrets in the world. For over 150 years the globalist merchants and their “agents of change” worked diligently towards their goal of “rebuilding the world” into an advanced communitarian civil society. Today, thanks to millions of “useful idiots” (whose beliefs helped murder a 100 million innocents), the left and right have nearly achieved the ultimate chaos necessary for humanity’s pleading to the U.N. for a more powerful global humanitarian peacekeeping force. U.N. diplomats will get the international legal sanctions to be backed up by more a moral military with the modern technology to step in and end all potential national “conflicts,” across the globe.

      Communitarian “thinkers” were essential to introducing the solution as an accredited social science “project.” Communitarians also perform valuable backdoor assaults on American standards for individual liberty defined by the U.S. Bill of Rights and U.S. State Constitutions. Communitarian scholars exploit bogus explanations for Americas’ moral decline and loss of communal bonds, and use their elitist think-tank influence to piggyback their theoretical solutions into all new and established national programs. Rebuilding community and the domestic and exported, expanding global War on Terror is entirely a communitarian based solution, and the appointed Iraqi government is the communitarian model for U.N.’s Agenda 21 plans for rebuilding the Middle East.

      In 2003, the Marxist solution to the thousands of global conflicts between the left and the right (solidly represented in every country of the world) is the communitarian balance between the “conflicts of opposites,” a middle ground, often called a Third Way.

      The communitarian solution has been successfully implemented via outright international communitarian laws, or, as in the U.S., via community justice, community development, community government, community councils, community volunteerism, and community policing. Every new government program in the U.S. that uses the words “sustainable, livable and safe community” (and accepts government/NGO grants) is a communitarian solution.

      In the 21st century, every member of every known political party on the planet plays a role in furthering Marx’s dialectic games. The Marxist game is so brilliantly designed that the more fervent your dedication to your personal beliefs, the more powerful a tool you become in the hands of the global communitarians. The communitarian solutionists design or infiltrate both sides to every conflict, and they have already positioned themselves into a libertarian-communitarian divide; they’ve already defined the final American “debate.” And, be aware America, they already know their own libertarian party platform is logically indefensible against the un-reasonable basis for more morally based global human rights’ charters and “equal social justice.”

      American and global communitarians are “shoring up” American and global (Christian and Islamic) immorality. Their programs balance selfish American (and all national self-interests) against the more humane, ancient Zionist version of global-local communism. Not only are American law schools teaching community law and Talmud to future American lawyers and judges, Chinese communitarian courts export regulations that overrule national laws. Globally and locally, communitarian law is the dominant law.

      (* Citations below)

      Who Is Amitai Etzion?

      Doctor Amitai Etzioni:
      founder of communitarianism, father of socio-economics

      Amitai Etzioni came to the US in 1958 and rose to the top of the sociology profession. Not only is he the founder of American communitarianism and author of The Limits of Privacy and The Spirit of Community:The Reinvention of American Society, he is also credited with developing the new science of socio-economics.

      He spends a lot of time on the road being interviewed and lecturing abroad and at US law schools about his “moral dialogue” to governments, bureaucrats, lawyers, judges and (of course) students. He promotes his ideology in a way that makes perfect sense to his elitist admirers, and confuses everyone else. His ancient collectivist platform and his innovative ways to remove us from “cultural relativism” are all designed to teach us to be more “responsive community members.” He insists the U.S. Bill of Rights must be innovatively balanced and that the world’s democratic governments are “evolving.”

      Etzioni’s critics call his brand of communitarianism “fascist.” Etzioni has never responded to the American social scientists who critisized him during his 1995 presidency of the ASA, but his position as the former ASA president is touted frequently during his lecture tours (without any reference what-so-ever to the controversy surrounding his Libertarian-Fabian-communitarian propaganda). According to a well-placed ACL source, campus rumor has it that the “more moral” Dr. Etzioni is not well liked by his students nor by his academic associates at George Washington University.

      Amitai Etzioni, at his very core, is a paradox. After studying his dissertation, his early internationally published works, and his philosophical musings, we compared his early works to his later published communitarian works. It is the ACL’s opinion that Etzioni does not write everything he claims, (the styles are too varied and conflicting) and we can not understand why his position as a leading Zionist influence in the White House is never mentioned by the American Press. For a complete review of Etzioni’s history and his supreme moral influence on American Public Policy from the ACL perspective, please read Chapter Three of Big Mother: An Unsustainable Concept.


      On the one hand, Etzioni is firm? in his stand against American’s private ownership of guns and claims the Second Amendment was written with a “communitarian clause” that calls for community militias and not “individual gunslingers.” Etzioni refuses to answer his critics from the American “right”, those individual gunslinger advocates who challenge his communitarian gun ownership ideology. Etzioni’s written thousands of words on the “need” for national disarmament and founded his own international peace organization. This very exceptional peaceful man started his adult life as a hard-core Fabian socialist, as a communist-kibbutz raised Zionist who became a trained revolutionary soldier fighting with the ferocious David Ben Gurion against the British and the Arabs in 1946. In 1947 he was an Israeli soldier in the Arab War, he supports Bush Jr’s War on Iraq, he endorses the highly controversial Project for A New American Century, and he endorses the need for a National ID Card to make America a safer place from (anti-Israeli) terrorists.

      In 1992 Etzioni wrote “The Evils of Self-Determination” for Foreign Policy, where he opened with “Self-determination movements, a major historical force for more than 200 years, have largely exhausted their legitimacy as a means to achieve more democratic states.” His thoughts on Iraq in October, 2002? “If the Shiites, who have long been oppressed in Iraq, want to fight the Sunni over their rights or create a separate state, why should we lose sleep over it? After all, Iraq is an artificial creation imposed on the people of the region by foreign powers. If the people of this area now seek self-determination along different lines than were drawn some generations ago, why should we stand in their way? We have nothing to fear if two or three countries will be formed in the area now called Iraq. If, in the process, there is some fighting among these groups, we surely would not welcome it; we regret bloodshed, but it would hardly be the first war of ethnic liberation in which we did not intervene.”

      In March 2003 Etzioni organized a Congressional briefing on how to improve identification while enhancing security and guarding privacy. His invitation list reads like a who’s who in promoting American fascism, and includes a representative from the Schlumbergers, the Smartcard family who goes way back in American history. It’s not clear whether he supports human chip implants to enhance our national security, we only know that Etzioni includes microchip implants in his “privacy dialogues.”

      The ACL will continue to follow Dr. Etzioni’s more moral views on current events, and we’ll post some of his most relevant publications, which he makes so easily available via his personal notes, posted on his editorial blog site.


      In Their Own Words:

      Communitarianism Explained: “The Communitarian Network is a coalition of individuals and organizations who have come together to shore up the moral, social, and political environment. We are a nonsectarian, nonpartisan, transnational association…The Communitarian Network investigates issues and policies such as the balance between rights and responsibilities in society, community justice, multiculturalism, the community’s moral voice, and developing global society.”

      In Stanford’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy explains how it evolved.

      Modern-day communitarianism began in the upper reaches of Anglo-American academia in the form of a critical reaction to John Rawls landmark 1971 book A Theory of Justice.

      Drawing primarily upon the insights of Aristotle and Hegel, political philosophers such as Alasdair MacIntyre, Michael Sandel, Charles Taylor and Michael Walzer disputed Rawls assumption that the principal task of government is to secure and distribute fairly the liberties and economic resources individuals need to lead freely chosen lives.”

      (Note: Aristotle used logic, Hegel distorted logic, and Marx expanded on Hegel’s distortion, it’s called the Hegelian Dialectic.)

      Nikki Raapana is co-founder of the Anti-Communitarian League

      For further citations, articles, ACL projects, and verifiable in-depth research, visit To rebut any or all of this description with counter arguments based on verifiable citations, email Nikki:



      MP3 on Communitarianism found via search engine.

      *scan for viruses with your virus program after downloading.

      Raapana MP3 interview on Communitarianism-Excellent

      [audio src="" /]
      [audio src="" /]
      [audio src="" /]

      read more about Communitarianism at Raapana’s Communitarianism website:

      also see: – below learn about:

      Rebuilding Community
      Community “visionings”
      Sustainable Development
      UN Local Agenda 21
      World Heritage Sites, Buffer Zones, and Scenic Byways
      The Wildlands Project & Wilderness Designations
      Importing and Exporting Democratic Ideals
      Grant funded research and development incentives

      Other websites featuring Raapana info on Communitarianism.

      Several excellent links to Raapana material at

      learn about the connection to the Hegelian Dialectic:

      Utube on Communitarianism:

      Nikki Raapana on Communitarianism on UTube

      Etzioni on The Spirit of Community

      Amitai Etizioni aka Werner Falk established Communitarianism with the help of Gorbachev, Joe Biden, the UN and others. see interviews by Constance Cumby.


      Stop UN Local Agenda 21 (LA21) – the REAL NWO

      Anti-Communitarian League (ACL)

      It’s all covered.

      Comment by gangstalking | July 18, 2009 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: