Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Zero tolerance rules to be reviewed.

http://www.thestar.com/News/article/201456

Zero tolerance to be repelled, but what will be in it’s wake?

I want to be cheerful and happy that enough light, court cases, or cries for justice have been brought to this very discriminatory policy, but like others I will hold my breath and wait and see.

The Safe Schools Act, also known as zero tolerance, which some say [quote]unfairly targets black youth and drives them into gangs.
[/quote]

It not only targets black youths and drives them into gangs, but then when the police raid those very same gangs, they covert many of these young people into their slave army of snitches, so if they are not a part of one gang they are a part of another gang. The last seven years has given the state and endless supply of young slaves who have no choice but to snitch for the state, and when they try to leave the State gang their punishment is just the same, either jail if they are lucky, or being gunned down on the street, because they realised that they were nothing better than slaves for these programs.

Still the fact that this racist and discriminatory program is finally under review is something to be hopeful about, but people need to be vigilante. They can’t think that just because this program is under review, another will not come into affect to take it’s place. Remember the effects of this program have given the state an endless supply of forced snitches, who then make sure the State do not have to hire enough police or others to keep an eye on communities, because these kids are then used in the monitoring and spying as extensions of the state.
[quote]”You have kids who are expelled for accidentally touching someone, you have kids who are expelled for stealing pop and chips,” he said. “It criminalizes them and it diminishes their choices. Those kids are not going to be able to go to university or college.”[/quote]

The idea is to criminalise them and diminish their choices, because then you have them, exactly where you want them. Parents need to do their part too, even if you are working two jobs to get by, and this program or one similar to it goes after your children, you need to make sure they finish their education online, and find some way to keep them on course. It’s no accident who was targeted by this program, and it’s no accident that so many kids were caught up in the sneer of this program.
[quote]Worse, Pieters said those students often fall into the hands of gangs – something that has led the Safe Schools Act to be called the “gang recruitment act.”[/quote]

Gangs who are increasingly being controlled by the state snitch force? Because after they are arrested for the illegal drugs and guns, which children have no network of getting their hands on without influence, they are then propelled into the other system. See how it’s working?
[quote]While some members of the Conservative caucus urged the Liberals not to “throw the baby out with the bath water,” Conservative Leader John Tory admitted the act needs some tweaking.

“We have to find better ways than expulsion to deal with young people who have got into trouble in school,” he said. “If you expel them from school and say that’s it, you have almost inevitably destined them to a fate that is going to be trouble for the rest of their lives.”[/quote]

Only because so many articles have been written on this and so many parents have fought with you all and taken you to task on this, or else you would continue doing this. Of course this needs to be reviewed, because it’s not working, and you are causing more problems in society than you are fixing with this act.
[quote]But NDP Leader Howard Hampton said the Liberals have had almost four years to make these changes while the act discriminated against visible minorities and low-income students.

“The evidence has been there for three-and-a-half years,” he said. “This is like another promise from the government on the eve of an election when they have, in fact, done nothing.”[/quote]

It’s true, this was implemented by the Tory government, and what else could you expect? However the liberal government did have years to fix this and choose not to. It says a lot about the people that are being voted in, and the things that that they care about or rather don’t care about and that would seem to be your children.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t seem to matter which party is in power, because anyone of them could have had this amended. At the end of the day, parents need to be watchful and vigilant, you can no longer assume that your child will be treated in an equal, fair or unbiased manner, by the school or the state and it’s policies. You have to be more vigilant and you have to find workarounds for your children, the cards are deliberately stacked against them and for a reason. This program was working for someone and that is why it’s still in place.

It’s good to see them reviewing the program, but I wait to see what will replace it, or if any real changes will come about because of the spotlight brought to it. Policies are just words, the people with the mentality who were enforcing the programs will still be in the schools and will still find a way to get your kids kicked out and on the wrong path, that does not lead to success. Parents still have to be the beacon that finds a way for their children to succeed, now more than ever.

April 12, 2007 Posted by | Bullying, Cultural diversity and multiculturalism, discrimination, harassment, Laws, metropolitan police, New World Order, NWO, Politics, Snitches, society, zero tollerance | 2 Comments

The thought police.

http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/04/10/tech-bloggers.html

The thought police strike again.

Now I usually write semi nice postings, but after reading this.

Who the hell are you to be telling us what to write, think or feel? It’s not your job to be the thought police, or maybe it is? Most bloggers who post do not have their posting carried across the offline world, and hitting all the online news papers, but obviously you do, and that is when it crosses the line.

A blog is meant to be your thoughts, feelings and emotions online. Now if people have to start issuing a user name and password so that the very sensitive can read their blogs so be it, but don’t tell us what to think and feel.

In France they are thinking of or they restricted who can post some violent pictures, then it willl be who can post, because only certain voices should be heard. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6426235.stm

When we start having to restrict all our voices, feelings, emotions, then what’s left? Gosh the Internet is the last free frontier, and even though it’s not that free, it’s something that we have left.

Now you could have said something like, bloggers just need to be a little bit nicer, but no, you are actually trying to tell people how to act and be.

Once you take away all your little, act this way, think that way, what’s left, honestly?

If people blogged the exact way that they speak in person, there would be a lot less interesting blogs. There would be a lot less interesting content. There would be a lot less people writing.

It’s bad enough that the government is taking away people’s voices, hijacking our media, force feeding what children learn, think, and become, and that average citizens have no power and no voices, and then you come along with this. It’s irritating and annoying.

Do tell people who to be and what to think and how to act. If you don’t like a posting then, comment on it. Maybe you are just coming across a lot of offensive posting, or maybe someone in a position of power asked you to use your influence to try to tell people what to think, act and be, but you know what, it’s just not appreciated.

I am currently surrounded by a world of stupid people, who can’t think for themselves, who can’t act independently, and who just do whatever the crowd is doing. They do not know how to act, interestingly the things they say in person, are not worth my time, and if the Internet turned into another version of that, it would not be appreciated, at all.

The only interesting people seem to still be online, same with the content that I like to read, and the people online, the ones that I have come across might act up, but that’s their right, to an extent. Don’t get me wrong there are limits, and maybe an article expressing that would have been good, but trying to enforce your views and values on everyone else about what should be included in a web blog and what should not be is not appreciated. We don’t need yet one more venue of mindless auto-bots.

There are things that I blog about that I would not necessarily say the exact same way, oh I would say them, but I would at times try to be more nice and considerate, which I am sick and tired of. It’s ok to tell us to be more civil or state that opinion, but to write a code, and use your influence to tell us what to think and feel is just not appreciated. I wish you wouldn’t do it.

When it’s a posting on your site, that’s your business, but when it makes national headlines, then it seems like someone might be using you to use your influence to become the thought police online, and it’s just not appreciated.

[quote]”But frankness does not have to mean lack of civility. There’s no reason why we should tolerate conversations online that we wouldn’t tolerate in our living room.”[/quote]

In reference to the above quote, are your serious? There is every reason, in your living room it’s your turf, you don’t want to hear swearing, that’s your damn business, but to come and tell others what to do, that is crossing the line. It’s also going to influence people that are pretty moderate to possibly write harsher postings.

If you think someone is swearing too much, don’t read their blogs. If you think that they are irritatingly racist, don’t read their blog, if they swear too much, don’t read their blogs, if you don’t like the way they roll, don’t be around them. The point of cyberspace, in case you missed it, is this is not your damn living room, don’t tell people what to think, act and be. It’s freaking cyberspace.
[quote]O’Reilly wrote that a final version of the code would eventually be posted on bloggingcode.org. Users wishing to adhere to the standard could display a badge that would link to the rules.

[/quote]

In reference to the above quote, does your little badge say brought to you by the thought police? I honestly feel like boycotting any blogs that would adhere to this, but with the world of mindless sheeple that now lies before us, I am sure that you will have plenty of followers, I obviously will just not be one of them.

My point is, if you want to enforce this on your blog and your space, that’s your business, but when you try to tell everyone else what to think and feel, that’s my business, and I am telling you it’s not appreciated.
However I am sure that the government will come up with some cleaver ploy in the near future that will have bloggers scared for their life and oh so willing to give up yet one more right and freedom. Maybe we will see a terrorist crash into the blogosphere, because of people posting too liberally, then it will be the war on blogging, then nowhere will be safe, and they will then be forced to issue bans, and tell people who has the right to post. Then you will have the mindless sheeple who have taken over the offline world, trying to take over the blogosphere. All we need, more none animated, none thinking people, telling everyone else what to think and feel and how to be. A lot of stuff online is not fit for the queen to be reading, but you don’t see her issuing a royal decree saying I don’t wish for things I would not want to hear in my presence to be posted online in blogs, we have spoken. You don’t see her doing that do you? Because cyberspace is not meant to be a mindless little, restrictive bubble where everyone walks on eggshells. I deeply resent the people who came up with these rules, trying to force them down everyone else’s heads.

Don’t tell me what to think, don’t tell me what to feel, and don’t tell me how to express myself. If you haven’t noticed that’s what they do offline, thus why more people are turning to cyberspace in the first place. If it did not offer so much more, than than the insipid conversations found offline, approved by the thought police, do you think people would be here posting?

April 12, 2007 Posted by | Bullying, Censorship, discrimination, harassment, Laws, New World Order, NWO, Politics, society, Thought Police, zero tollerance | Leave a comment