Revamping the informants
(The informant system does not want to be sued)
The informant system and the study of it is truly interesting. also the informant system does not want to be sued. Recall, I first begun this journey, trying to discover what was happening and occurring to Targeted Individuals, and why they were being Gang Stalked. Upon discovering it was not ‘Vigilant Gangs’, or what have you, the investigation turned to the Threat Assessment Team files, informant system, agency operations, and Remote Neural Monitoring, Mind Control, Electronic Harassment. A world of light, and I do mean light research later, I am clear that there is so much more to this, some stuff, that can not be blogged about at this time, if ever. In the mean time, what can be blogged about is this, the informant system that is out there, as it relates to society as a whole, does need to be revamped.
There are legitimate situations occurring, such as, well this person has a marker, medium risk, and at this time we feel only to be seen or viewed in pairs. That situation, should only be for a specific amount of time, the person should be reviewed, and not deliberately provoked on an ongoing and reoccurring basis, to ‘keep the case, files going’. Such a waste.
The informant system in the background, and other sources are responsibly keeping such things going, deliberately provoking, banging into people, giving instructions to the local informants, who could be anyone, cause people are getting onto the actual informant system, for simple things, and then they do what they are advised or bidden to do, even if it’s harmful or detrimental to others. Tell lies, bang into others, accidents, and a thousand other perversities.
Agencies also play a deliberate role, some of which has been previously documented. I am going to post a clip from Control Factor, and then the case of John St Clair Akawi, Vs NASA, Part2 then the DT Stockton documents, and you can read up a bit more about what individuals are capable of. Once a person is listed for monitoring, a variety of sources, can enter their situations, even without a Threat Assessment File, some have these situations ongoing. Part 2
Control Factor. =In the movie he is speaking or talking about evoked potential, and how the human brain has been mapped, and how we can be manipulated, or controlled at a distance. This movie is worth watching, that is what can be mentioned. Please see previous articles, Robot Sentient Research Project.
I want these individuals, that are a part of these mini, conspiracies to be eligible to be in the incorrect situations, doing the incorrect things, meaning, I want them to be responsible for their actions. I also want a modicum of world peace, but that is unlikely to occur, or happen, at this moment. Instead, charging each person, and affecting them financially, when they are part of these mini conspiracies, isn’t the incorrect thing, but charging each informant, is a waste of space and time and energy. Most are just doing what their handler told them, or what the police chief told them, or what their parole officer told them, and so forth, and on, and on it goes. They take directions, primarily. So enable those giving the directions, to be a part of the process. Yes indeed. The handlers want to have them systemically destroying someone’s life, that’s fine, enable them to be included. Won’t want them to feel, left out.
The handlers can take individual responsibility, right back to the local informants, monitoring units, what have you. Then you can also at times go even one level deeper than the handlers, and sometimes, all too often that is where the problem lies, but that is also where the funding lies, and the means to continue these operations. If you can’t go after them morally, or ethically, and you can, but it takes time, go after them financially instead.
The revamp of these situations needs to occur. The laws can all be passed, but without reinforcement, laws at times are useless. Fines and penalties, might be the way to go. As it is now, these informants do the dirty, often what they are directed, then they get protected at times, other times they are asked to take the fall. It’s a serious waste of space.
Revamp the system, include the fee, fines, penalties, but then act on it. When the individuals giving the directions, the ones that are directly correlated, when they are exposed, asked to pay their fines, and fees, then maybe it will make sense.
That’s what I think needs to occur, that’s part of my feedback, and recommendation for this system.
Conspiracy & Indictment
I think we really need to go after those on the informant system that are systemically destroying innocent lives. I really want to see them at every level be held accountable. I don’t care if it’s close relatives, co-workers, community workers etc., those taking instructions knowing from an informant system, that gives them instructions to systemically remove someone from their outcomes should be billed as a conspiracy, and dealt with and handled the exact same way.
In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act must also have been undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offence). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability but may reduce their sentence.
Therefore if the individuals in your life are taking additional instructions to get into argument, physically get into altercations, say things of an untrue nature that might adversely effect the individual, they are part of a conspiracy, and ever increasingly in most countries, that is punishable by the law.
The informant class and what they do, the lies they tell, the incidents they cause are nothing but conspiracy. Most targets go after them at a community level, but what should also be done is a review of the series of discussion, and conversations that go on with these individuals, and the local monitoring units.
Most of these individuals are on the informant system, most have records, many are will to do the worst things to an innocent person. Any plot outside of the normal guidelines of the Threat Assessment Files, need to now be reviewed a little closer. These incidents are not harmless, these instructions these individuals are being given, to act out, and act upon are life ruining, systemic destruction of the individuals. They are nothing but problematic, and they need to be reviewed, very carefully. These instructions that they often get, from the local monitoring teams, their informant handlers, or whoever is in contact with them are life destroying, and they are pre-planned, thus conspiracy, and I want to see the community move forward with looking into this angle and aspect of it.
Chief of police, -or informant handler, or local monitoring unit, a typical kind of conversation they might have with someone close to the target, Now Jamie this is what I want you to do, the next time you are in a situation with this guy, I want you to set him up, I want you to make him look crazy, start saying a bunch of shit, like but your’ acting weird today eh, your seem strange, your’ making me uncomfortable, try to get him irritated, so that he can get into an argument with you, or act out, if he hits you even better, and just document all this stuff, even if it’s not the actual thing.
He’s clear they are setting the guy up, but he’s clear it’s the police, or his informant handler, or the local monitoring units asking this, and as per his parole, he is required to now be a part of the informant system, and that is what he is agreeing to, he is clear that this is dirty, but he’s clear that he being used and utilized in this capacity.
Wither Jamie is clear that the chief, the handler, or the local monitoring units are going after this guys credibility, what may not be clear is that behind the scene, maybe the guy upset someone, filed a lawsuit against his company, or has something they want, or might even simply not be on the informant system themselves, and they are just using Jamie, and several others in this persons life to systemically remove them, from their outcomes.
The same group might also be in touch with Phylis, she is also an informant in the persons life, they now active her, or reactivate her.
Chief, or informant handler, or local monitoring unit
Now P this is what you are going to do, just tell the guy he looks a little spaced out, airy, maybe that her’s acting paranoid, or maybe you suspect he’s maybe using drugs, just document everything.
Phylis for her part is clear that she’s being asked to make the guy seem funny, but she thinks it’s ok because this is what she’s being asked to do, maybe they just want the guy to seek some help.
Chief, informant handler, or local monitoring unit
Now Mira, I want you to do this, just do this, you got this neighbour here, everytime you see the guy outside, just report that he’s acting weird or strange, maybe you feel that your kids are at risk, everytime you see him, your’ going to say and document that he was acting weird, and maybe the guy needs to seek some help.
Mira: Has been an informant for year, is clear on what she is doing, but is only clear on her part, does what’s instructed, as she has a thousand times, because this is what they are required to do, and if it’s these individuals asking, who are affiliated with the police, or parole officer, or local monitoring units, she will do it.
Chief of police, local monitoring units, or handler, or even parole officer
Jeff you are just going to do this, your new best friend is dean, and you are just going to visit him, and when your their, just confirm that the guy was acting weird you know, looking off into space, maybe staring at you, you know, making you feel uncomfortable. Make sure it get’s reported back and documented.
Jeff is likely this sketchy low life that works for the police on a regular basis, in one capacity, and in one regards, he’s a local community rapist, child molester, and someone the police hold dear, cause he does the odd job for them, that can’t be on the records, or on the files. He’s fully willing to destroy this guy, infect his reputation, or even the person himself, whatever these people need to destroy this guy, cause that’s what he does, that’s what he’s
done a thousand times before, and will likely do a thousand times again.
Chief of police, handler, or local monitoring unit, or even parole officer
Staf: When you are in these situations with this guy, just tell him he’s acting weird, like maybe he’s got weird eye gestures or something, maybe he’s staring off into space, doing weird things with his hands, tell him you feel uncomfortable, and that maybe he needs to see someone.
Now there are probably dozens of other little players, employers, your public servants, who then get similar instructions, the guy has been acting out, acting weird, may be a threat to himself or others, medium risk, only to be seen in pairs.
That’s how they legitimize these files that go on for years, they are dirty, deceiving, Judas class, but then you already knew that, yourself. Between these deliberate individuals, these informants that are a part of the persons life, it’s the death of a thousand little deceptions.
These are some of the deceptions the dirty ones that go on, to keep a Targeted Individual in the incorrect situation, this is a conspiracy against their life, and it’s no longer suitable, across the globe, these situations are being played out on a daily basis, and they need to be addressed in the manner and the capacity to which they impact the society and the individual.
When a society, a community is littered with such situations, social interactions are infected, it tears at and destroys the very fiber, and fabric of the society, and this needs to be curtailed. For years it’s really come down to the Targeted Individual community to bring these situations, these conspiracies to light, it’s been years of research into these topics, but this is what I would like to see occur. I would like to see these conspiracies address and dealt with the way that suits, and makes sense. The informant system is doing nothing good, and needs to be changed and revamped. Part of these conspiracies, which we have at times called Gang Stalking, need to be addressed, and dealt with at the highest spiritual, and legal levels possible.
I would like to see changes to these structures, and to how these case files are documented. I want to ensure that those documenting, and bearing false reports are uniquely identified, even if it’s just anonymously. I would like to see changes to who can and can not be on the informant system. When you have lawyers, doctors, politicians, decision makers, who can be advised to side a certain way, pass this specific law, or make this specific decision because they are informants, or on the informant system, you have an undue influence, that is problematic, or even deadly for that society, and individual to whom or where it is aimed.
An indictment (/ɪnˈdaɪtmənt/ in-DYT-mənt), in the common law system, is a formal accusation that a person has committed a crime. In jurisdictions that maintain the concept of felonies, the most serious criminal offence is a felony; jurisdictions that lack the concept of felonies often use that of an indictable offence—an offence that requires an indictment.
Legal action might not be the incorrect thing in dealing with these situations, but is your lawyer free of subversion, are they free of the informant system, are the prosecutors? In the U.K. where Masons and their undue influence became such a problem, they literally had to pass laws, which might have required Mason affiliations to be revealed, as they might have, undue influence.
Should a similar law be passed when dealing with those on the influence, considering how intrenched this is in the background, throughout the society?
They night not want to reveal their identities, or affiliation, but maybe it’s time the laws protected those, that might be unduly affected, or destroyed, by the infection that is the informant system.
Share your Targeted Individual Story, over the next few months and have them posted, or at IndigoRibbon.com
If you are a Targeted Individual and have a story to share, please leave your story at the Indigo Ribbon blog, and over the next year, we hope to collect the new stories, to add to the Indigo Ribbon Quilt.
You can also support the efforts of the Indigo Ribbon Quilt, or the Gang Stalking World website in a variety of ways.
Also you can support the targeted individual and Gang Stalking books at Amazon.com and other great locations.
The world is a dangerous place,
not because of those who do evil,
but because of those who look on and do nothing.
~ Albert Einstein
The Indigo Ribbon Campaign is an awareness campaign in support of Targeted Individuals.
The Indigo Ribbon is a ray of hope for Targeted Individuals everywhere. The color represents Infinity. It’s a sign of remembrance for targets no longer here. A symbol of unity and strength for targets who remain.
The primary goal of the IRC is to bring awareness, about what is happening to Targeted Individuals and the methods being used to target, harass, and destroy them. The idea is to promote compassion and understanding about what they are experiencing and how their targeting affects the rest of society.
You can also post it on blogs, forums, websites, etc. Each campaign is independently managed and operated and yet all effort go towards promoting awareness and understanding of Targeted Individuals and their plight.
Volunteers can post on forums, send out emails, post in ezines, online news sites, blogs, podcasts, conference calls, youtube.
Who are Targeted Individuals? They are innocent individuals that are being targeted by government programs and initiatives, past and present.
Why they need help? Targets of this harassment need help in bringing about awareness that this is still happening. Not only is this targeting still happening, but it’s happening unaided and unassisted, and many targets are being destroyed by this. What is happening is that when Targets have applied to the main stream humanitarian organizations their plea’s for assistance have gone unaided.
To find out more about the Indigo Ribbon Campaign, or what you can do to help, you can follow this link. http://www.Indigoribbon.com/Quilt.
To find out more about what Targeted Individuals go through, you can visit these sites.
Just as despair can come to one only from other human beings, hope, too, can be given to one only by other human beings.
– – Elie Weisel
A poster wrote in to clarify my opinion as to why I distance myself from some Gang Stalking initiavites. He asked me specifically about Ms. White and here is my response.
Ms White does several things that I am personally not in accord with.
She focuses on the Stalking aspect of Gang Stalking. Nothing wrong with that, but the few times I have come across her initiatives she has focused on linking this primarily to stalking and changing those laws. Nothing wrong with that, but I don’t believe this will change what is happening to Gang Stalking targets. Changing stalking laws will not change community notifications if that is what we are looking at. You have to name it if you are going to claim it.
I have always focused on the mobbing aspect of this harassment and focusing on the stalking aspect in my opinion is going to be less effective. I have from the start believed that mobbing and the way mobbing targets emotionally act out, best corrolates to the Gang Stalking movement.
Ms White has often criticized websites as bad sites, poison sites, etc, for linking the Gang Stalking harassment to government and state initiatives. That fine, yet other sites seem to get a pass for doing the same thing, and she manages to keep them off her credibility review websites. Ms White has continued to advocate Terrorist Stalking in America, a book that links Gang Stalking first to Stalking crews then to terrorists. She is always asking for proof, when someone mentions the government, yet never has the same issue with openly advocating something that even in her words has a wrong conclusion. She should be also screaming for proof on the Terrorist Stalking book but fails to. This seems to be a double standard that she has. I would love to see the book on her credibility review site, which I feel she covertly uses to attack others, under the guise of these reviews, but she is allowed to do what she wants to.
Ms White in my opinion often leads targets in directions that I do not often agree with. I think her site has loads of useful and valuable information, but when new targets come online, I just need it to be very clear that I am not affiliated with many of her initiatives. All too often they think that all sites share the same opinions and we often do not. In distancing myself from her initiatives, I hope to move targets in more useful directions. Get them more streamlined with things that might help them.
I have been on Eleanor’s forum, things always seem to move forward, but nothing ever seems to actually get done, but she conducts them very professionally. I just feel that we often disagree in various ways and I just like that to be made clear.
The FFCHS site is currently working with John Hall and a politician on laws that I don’t think will fix the problems in the Gang Stalking community. John Hall if focusing on Satalights, which is fine, but to get to the heart of the problem, I think the local initiatives like community notifications need to be addressed. They are getting good press and it feels like things are happening, like things are going forward, but like the time they got targets to write in with information about a multiple lawsuit, I don’t think this will work any better. Thus I don’t want targets linking the two, and thinking that we all share the same ideas. Thus even when laws get passed the angle that is being taken I don’t feel will move things along the way that they need to go, in the direction that they need to go in. That is why I personally have chosen to distance myself from the direction that those initiatives have moved in.
I also had a discussion with a lawyer, who blasted all the Gang Stalking sites, and I asked why? It was because he had a disagreement with FFCHS and possibly Eleanor and thus he wrote off all the Gang Stalking sites. This really opened my eyes, and I didn’t think that was fair. So thus now, it’s made very clear that not all Gang Stalking sites share the same views. Thus if I do an initiative that they don’t agree with, they are not linked and visa versa.
I also have distanced myself from a poster who suggests that targets write a wild Freedom Of Information Act request. I do agree and fully support Freedom Of Information Act requests. I don’t support what was being suggested. Everytime certain fractions and their so called authority are challenged, character assassinations begin by their members, and those affiliated with those movements, they have a consistent habit of doing so, and thus one more reason I often choose to disassociate. Very simple really.
Lastly those fractions prefer to call this Organized Stalking, and sometime ago, I had to really fight to keep the term Gang Stalking after Eleanor decided that Organized Stalking was the term to use. She tried to have the term annexed after four years of really hard work to get the term popularized, in favor of a term most that is not as popular and would have set the movement back. Again at that time, I had to have unneeded character assassinations from some of their members, website attacks, which always happens when openly disagreeing with them. So now I am just very clear about which direction I am going in and which direction they are going in.
Some see this distancing as attacks on those sites, but it’s really just to ensure my initiatives do not affect them, and visa versa.
I hope this answers your question.
Ever since researching the Human Flesh Search Engine people are probably a little confused. What is the difference between something like that and Gang Stalking?
Well I thought that this would be a good time to briefly go over some of the harassment’s that are similar, and what the differences are. If I have forgotten anything forgive me in advance.
-Subtle and Covert. Mobbing has many aspects similar to Gang Stalking. The emotional and psychological abuse that the Targeted Individual suffers is very similar to what targets of workplace mobbing suffer. On this level the mobbing community are our closest relations, and this is why Gang Stalking has also been termed community mobbing by some.
Mobbing can be understood as the stressor to beat all stressors. It is an impassioned, collective campaign by co-workers to exclude, punish, and humiliate a targeted worker. Initiated most often by a person in a position of power or influence, mobbing is a desperate urge to crush and eliminate the target. The urge travels through the workplace like a virus, infecting one person after another. The target comes to be viewed as absolutely abhorrent, with no redeeming qualities, outside the circle of acceptance and respectability, deserving only of contempt. As the campaign proceeds, a steadily larger range of hostile ploys and communications comes to be seen as legitimate. …
Not infrequently, mobbing spelled the end of the target’s career, marriage, health, and livelihood. From a study of circumstances surrounding suicides in Sweden, Leymann estimated that about twelve percent of people who take their own lives have recently been mobbed at work.”
~ Kenneth Westhues, Professor of Sociology
Mobbing can be ongoing for years, it can cause health problems, and can even cause the targets to become violent, or have emotional breakdowns. Mobbing is hard to prove, and changing jobs might stop the mobbing, but it may not. Mobbing can cause you to be blacklisted from your field of employment.
-This is an overt form of harassment that involves 24/7 surveillance . The targets cell or cameraphones are used to track and monitor them 24/7.
Emotionally it’s stressing to the targets just like Gang Stalking, but with cellphone stalking and the overt nature of the harassment, targets often have evidence to present to the police. Also the targets could get rid of their phones to stop the harassment.
Human Flesh Search Engine
-This is often overt and swift. In Korea it’s called Cyber Violence, and in America it’s called Cyber Vigilantism.
Human flesh search engines: Chinese vigilantes that hunt victims on the web
A new phenomenon is sweeping China after the quake: digital witch hunts of those who dare to be outspoken or criticise
Ms Wang’s Chinese name, Chinese identification number and contact details in America were tracked down and posted across the internet. She received hate mail and threats that if ever she returned to China, she would be “chopped into 10,000 pieces”. Her parents’ address in China was published and they were forced to go into hiding.
Tibetans have also been targeted. After 44-year-old Lobsang Gendun was photographed protesting at the Olympic torch relay in London, Paris and San Francisco, the human flesh search engine whirred into action.
With huge overseas communities, it took just a couple of hours for Chinese web users to collate the pieces of Mr Gendun’s life – replete with Google satellite map and photos of his American home.
“I suggest assassination,” wrote one poster. “Execution by shooting,” said another. No, no, insisted yet another: “Use China’s most ancient form of execution – dismember him.”
In an unfortunate case of mistaken identity, it turned out there was another exiled Tibetan called Lobsang Gendun living in Utah. Since the targeting of his namesake began, Mr Gendun, a self-proclaimed “Olympic supporter”, has received hundreds of aggressive emails and telephone calls.
The speed to which the vigilantes can mount an attack is amazing, not just in China, but in Korea and America as well.
The digital age allows critics to quickly find a fair amount of information about their targets. One day last November, at about 11:30 a.m., a blog focused on making New York streets more bike-friendly posted the license plate number of an SUV driver who allegedly accelerated from a dead stop to hit a bicycle blocking his way.
At 1:16 p.m., someone posted the registration information for the license plate, including the SUV owner’s name and address. (The editor of the blog thinks the poster got the information from someone who had access to a license-plate look-up service, available to lawyers, private investigators and police.) At 1:31 p.m., another person added the owner’s occupation, his business’s name and his title. Ten minutes later, a user posted a link to an aerial photo of the owner’s house. Within another hour, the posting also included the accused’s picture and email address.
The SUV’s owner, Ian Goldman, the chief executive of Celerant Technology Corp. in the New York City borough of Staten Island, declined to comment for this article. According to an email exchange posted on the blog, Mr. Goldman said that he had lent the vehicle in question to a relative with “an urgent medical situation” and that he was not aware of any incident. The alleged victim has decided to drop the matter since the damage to the bicycle, which he was standing next to at the time, was under $20. Last month, Aaron Naparstek, editor of the blog, says he removed Mr. Goldman’s home and email addresses from the site after receiving a “lawyerly cease and desist” email asking that the whole posting be deleted.
This is in America and I see very little difference to some of the stories that happened in China.
Here is one more from Korea where they call it cyber violence, or online Mobbing.
SEOUL Kim Myong Jae’s estranged girlfriend was found dead in her room in Seoul on April 22 last year, six days after she poisoned herself.
Two weeks later, Kim, a 30-year-old accountant, found that he had been transformed into the No. 1 hate figure of South Korea’s Internet community, a victim of a growing problem in a country that boasts the world’s highest rate of broadband use.
First, death threats and vicious text messages flooded his cellphone. Meanwhile, spreading fast through blogs and Web portals were rumors that Kim had jilted his girlfriend after forcing her to abort his baby, that he had assaulted her and her mother, and that his abuse had finally driven her to suicide.
“By the time I found out the source of this outrage, it was too late. My name, address, photographs, telephone numbers were all over the Internet,” Kim said. “Tens of thousands of people were busy sharing my identity and discussing how to punish me. My name was the most-searched phrase at portals.” News reports and portals confirmed that his name was at the top of such lists.
The next time someone tells you that people would not waste the time in harassing others, or stalking others, just smile knowingly and point to these articles.
-This is often covert and done over a period of time, and the goal is to drive the person crazy, or to freak them out, or give them a breakdown.
Gaslighting is a form of intimidation or psychological abuse in which false information is presented to the victim, making them doubt their own memory and perception. The classic example of gaslighting is to change things in a person’s environment without their knowledge, and to explain that they “must be imagining things” when they challenge these changes. Popular usage of the term can be traced to at least the late 1970s.
The term derives from the 1938 stage play Gas Light, in which a wife’s concerns about the dimming of her house’s gas lights are dismissed by her husband as the work of her imagination, when he has actually caused the lights to dim. His action is part of a wider pattern of deception in which the husband manipulates small elements of his wife’s environment, and insists that she is mistaken or misremembering, hoping to drive her to insanity.
Use in real life
An example of gaslighting being used in real life was by the Manson Family during their “creepy crawler” burglaries during which nothing was stolen, but furniture in the house was rearranged.
Apparently this is an ongoing storyline. However if you want to see a really good storyline look up Drucilla being Gaslighted, also from the same soap opera, but from a few years ago. That was so well done, that the character ended up in a mental ward. It was a wonderful example of Gaslighting. I have not seen the Ashley storyline yet.
-Covert and ongoing. On an emotional and psychological level this is very similar to mobbing.
Bridging The Gap is a disturbing, yet poignant look into modern day democratic surveillance societies. The book examines how this structure is used to discredit, disenfranchise, and destroy innocent citizens. Gang Stalking, The Buzzsaw, Cointelpro, what do these words mean and more importantly what do they have in common? They are names that have been used to describe the systemic apparatus that reaches out to destroy and discredit those declared enemy by the state. This book will open your eyes to how the informant system has taken over these democratic countries, and how they are being used to further create a surveillance society where no one will be out of reach, should they too become persona non grata by the system.
I would say it’s a tie between stasi Germany and what happened under Cointelpro, however Stasi Germany probably most mirrors what is happening now.
You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to?
COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971. The FBI’s stated motivation at the time was “protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order
The Ministry for State Security, (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, commonly known as the Stasi [ˈʃtazi] (abbreviation German: Staatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official secret police of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was “Schild und Schwert der Partei” (Shield and Sword of the Party), showing its connections to the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED), the equivalent to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
As a part of the Gang Stalking psychological harassment, gaslighting may also be used.
The bigger picture is that the structure functions like a cult does.
In how it keeps the members in line, how they obey and how they punish and try to destroy those outside the cult and those who would leave the cult.
This is just a very quick and brief introduction to this subject matter. To learn more, I suggest doing your own research and reading up on the subject matter.
Troubling incident recently.
I have mentioned this before, but I will mention it to targets again, and I would have you be on the look out for this.
I have mentioned that what I believe is ongoing in many cases to keep these so called cases of investigations ongoing are a great deal of set up’s, and deliberate provocations, so let me go over a couple of recent incidents that I have noticed.
What I have tried to do off and on is if I notice a troubling incident, I will try to report it, provided that I am aware of it. I am trying to do this, because I believe there is clear evidence to indicate that what they are doing during these investigations is that they are using other people who fit the description to try to portray targets as crazy, perverts, drug dealers, etc, whatever they are trying to portray you as, they will them if they can’t get you, you get what I like to refer to as doppelgangers to do the dirty work for them.
I use the term doppelgangers very loosely, because these people are not doppelgangers, they are simply what I call fits the description. In other words if you are male, 45, white, 6’4 that is what they would ruffly try to use. The person does not have to look like you, dress like you, or anything else, they just have to fit the description. So if they are trying to get you to look like a pervert, they would use someone like, and have them insult females near where you are, look at them, or watch children etc. It does not have to be you, the incident just has to be attributed to you, and this will keep their investigations going, it will keep the informants who are getting paid to follow you, employed, and it keeps the need for this system going, and going.
So Eg. If you are an Asian, female, 5’2, 25, and they are trying to portray you as crazy, then let’s say that they can not get you to act out in public, they will get a female, who looks around that age, most likely Asian, maybe not, and then they will have that person act out in public. What’s most disturbing for me, is that I have blogged about this before, but I have seen it enough now, to be able to confirm that this is what they are doing deliberately.
I think you get the idea. What I have seen lately on a few separate occasions are that they deliberately have targets who fit the description crossing my path, (I use this term very loosely, because they dress nothing like me, and hygiene wise they look very unkempt, and I would say crazy. One Saturday as I left the house about 4 weeks ago, I had one cross my path who was talking to themselves and carry some bags in their hands, seemingly mentally unwell, but that has to be determined. Eg. I have seen informants, pretending to be crazy, I mean literally sane informants, who are pretending. In this particular instance, I do feel that the person really was crazy whoever, just by appearance, and unkempt manner, but there is no way to tell.
They were going in one direction, and I was going in another, but the thing with the informant force is they do not seem to be required to comment on appearance, or state of dress. Eg. I am always well dressed, never unkempt, and for the most part pretty polite. Except if I am making sarcastic comments under my breath, or commenting on the snitches. This happens very rearly, but I am guessing that these are getting used as well, as oh target was disturbed and talking to themselves.
The other incident recently involved someone who was in my opinion clearly disturbed and talking to themselves, the person was much much older looking, very unkempt in appearance, and clearly not looking anything like me to any sane and rational observer, yet I passed this person talking to themselves and telling people off, I left the location where this was happening, and walked not a short distance.
Within a short space of time, I had the street theater begin. Eg. People trying to run into me, etc, they were doing things to try to provoke me. Now I was in a pretty good mood, so just ignored them. What was disturbing however was there was a woman with a baby stroller, she was deliberately oncoming in my direction, in my direct path without making any attempt to adjust where she was going, and as I adjusted, she adjusted to keep in my path, from a far away enough distance that there was no reason to that I could see, however, and this is what’s disturbing, but I am reporting it, because I believe my observation on this is sound. She looked behind her to the side, and made eye contact with the cop in the car that was right near us both which I had not immediately noticed, and even though I could clearly see that she really did not want to aim her baby stroller at me, after looking behind at the car for instruction, she continued to do that, the look on her face was clear, she did not want to be doing that, she was clearly being instructed, and from what I could tell it was by whomever was in the cop car, whom I assume was observing the deliberate incident. It happened fairly quickly, yet it felt like it was in slow motion, because I had enough time to see the exchange with her and the person in the car, so all I could do after seeing this, was smile at her, and encourage her to do what she was doing, while moving out of her way, the best that I could, because she kept a direct path at me.
I was so sickened, but not for myself, I mean what kind of a society is this, where you get a young mother to pimp out her kid like that? What if I really was a dangerous and crazy person, you were willing to gamble that the brave officer sitting in the car would get to her, before an incident happened with the baby? I am not wrong in my observation of this, but shocked and disgusted. I don’t know why I am disgusted. I have an idea of how the Stasi worked, I know with these community policing programs they work similar, I know people are being asked to do things like this, but when you see it like this, it’s gross.
The thing is if that really had been me having a bad day, they were trying to provoke an incident. See when something is happening like crazy person talking to themselves, the snitches start to put in their little reports, so I don’t know how long the crazy person had been set up and in position.
I do know that this is happening and the best thing that I can do is report what I have been observing. Now I have had the neighbours watching and leaving when I am leaving, and we have the snitch force trying to chart my way from when I leave my home, to work and back etc. Since I am clear that I don’t require the babysitting, I don’t appreciate it. What’s interesting is that when there are people around that I know, I have never seen one of these little incidents happen, but when it’s people that I do not know, suddenly these incidents happen. So I have no way of knowing how many of these incidents that I am not aware of are happening and being attributed to me.
Shy of my baby stroller incident that I reported, and handing out flyer’s about a year ago, which I have also reported on these blogs, these people in my opinion are continuing to stage incidents, using the doppelgangers and the fit’s the description reporting. We do not have a moral society, we have a Stasi society, and the corruption that when on there is what is happening here. I believe the incidents are in many cases staged, set up’s, I believe the motivation is to portray the target as whatever they see fit, and I believe that it’s also to keep these programs going, and the informant force employed. Much like a lot of the fake hate posting online are designed to keep up the appearance of a threat to society, I believe these incidents continue in the same way. Eg. Jiverly Wong was reported as a drug user who was going to rob a bank by an informant, there does not seem to have been any validity to this, but after his death, thanks to the police, these details made it into every paper across the nation.
I find that these little incidents tend to happen more when I openly talk about the fact that we have informants in the city, or identify one of their citizen informants as such. I don’t know why they care, it’s not like most of them are not informants anyways, I guess gangs are like that however and don’t like their members identified as such.
As I pointed out before, legal action is I believe effective, but only if you can afford to do so, and second if you can find a law and lawyer that would allow you to do so. As for me, I refuse to be followed around the city like a child, the only disturbed people that I have seen are the people that have to take part in these programs, I find it very disgraceful, that citizens are being at times forced to do such things. I think it’s one thing to volunteer to go along with something like this, there are enough bottom of the barrel people to go around, but what I saw and witnessed today was fear, and cohesion. The female should not have been used in the prescribed manner I described above, I think it’s wrong, and again I would not take the time to report this, unless I sure the observation was correct. It’s also not the first time that I have seen something similar, with citizens being coerced by cops in similar manners. To serve and protect, who’s interests?
What I can tell you is that this society is what has become paranoid and disturbed, with good reason, because when you are a Stasi state, you will have people in disagreement with you, and it’s sad to see something that I though was good, as something that is not. I don’t view the citizens the way I once did. They are still the very polite people I once thought, but what is behind this is something that is quite scary. A Stasi society is apparently a polite society. It’s also a society where activists, and dissidents are portrayed as enemies of the state and are dealt with by being made to appear as mentally disturbed.
- Above top secret
- Abu Ghraib
- Active denial
- Active Denial Weapons
- as the world turns
- Asain Male
- Asian Female
- Astral Plane
- Background records checks
- bad luck
- Black female
- Black Females
- Black Male
- black women
- Brain reading device
- Britney Spears
- brown coats
- Buffy The Vampire Slayer
- changing vibrations
- Citizen Informants
- Civilian Spies
- Community harassment
- community mobbing
- community policing
- concentration camps
- constitutional change
- Controlled society
- Covert investigations
- Cultural diversity and multiculturalism
- david icke
- devinci code
- domestic spying
- East Germany
- electromagnetic frequency
- Electronic harassment
- Emotional Vampires
- False Prophets
- files updated
- Gang Stalking
- government corruption
- GPS tracking
- Guantanamo Bay
- Health and Safety
- Heath Ledger
- High technology
- Honey Trap
- Indigo Ribbon
- Informant System
- Intimate Infiltarations
- Jeremy Blake
- Joan of Ark
- John Lennon
- Kilmeer Gill
- Lord Of The Rings
- Marian Fisher
- Mark M Rich
- Markus Wolf
- Martin Luther King Jr
- Meat production
- mental concentration camps
- metropolitan police
- militarized police force
- Mind Control
- Mind Reading
- Minority women
- Naomi Ebersole
- National Security Letters
- Neurolinguistic programing
- New World Order
- one handed signals
- Online Stalking
- Passive Aggressive Manipulative
- Personal Identifiers
- Police Abuse
- Police Corruption
- Police State
- Production Company
- psychological harassment
- Quantum Physics
- Record keeping
- records updated
- Red Squads
- Robot Sentient Project
- Rosa Parks
- School Shooting
- sexual harassment
- sign language
- Skin Heads
- Social Control
- Spiritual Based Products
- Spy cameras
- spy satellites
- State target
- Stop snitching
- Targeted Individual
- The Matrix
- Theresa Duncan
- Third wave
- Thought Police
- Threat Assessment Teams
- time travel
- twilight zone
- violent persons registry
- Voice to skull
- walls of jericho
- whistle blower
- white female
- White Male
- workplace mobbing
- Young and the restless
- zero tollerance