Gang Stalking World

United we stand. Divided they fall.

Yvonne Hiller and Gang Stalking

The case of Yvonne Hiller demonstrates that many fail to understand the causes and affects of  these workplace shootings.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1284237842/4#4

Yvonne Hiller in my opinion was most likely a Gang Stalking target. What this means is that at some point in her work history she had likely been placed on a notification list. A list that would alert those around her that she had displayed violent or threatening behavior in the past.

Ms. Hiller did have a history of verbal and possible physical altercations in the last few years it’s been reported. Many people will see this and go, well then the list works. Surly if she killed people then she was violent and it was right to put her on the list, but this is the wrong conclusion. The pattern that has been seen, and that is happening is the same pattern the mobbing community identified. Years and years of  psychologically abusive targeting, will cause violent outcomes. Putting people on these notification lists, exposes them to years, and months of harassment. They are exposed to harassment such as being sprayed with chemicals, consistent rumours and slander, such as Ms. Hiller complained about. Harassment that is often very real, but so subtle that it’s almost impossible to prove.

Ms. Hiller had made complaints about workplace harassment, being sprayed by chemicals and other items by co-workers. At home she had the same complaints that chemicals were being sprayed in her home. Her calls to fire departments, and police went ignored. The harassment is meant to be subtle, hard to prove, but this is the same type of targeting that is happening to many others that are listed under these workplace occupational health and safety notification lists. Remember you can end up on these lists via work, school, or the community. Once added your life becomes hell, a systemic cycle of abuse that is hard to prove, and even harder for others to imagine. Cries for help are seen as a sign of mental illness, and every complaint there after is viewed as a need for psychological help. The reality is that once placed on these lists, people are being harassed.

There is a system, a deliberate organized system that is connected, coordinated, and capable of destroying a persons life, with harassment’s that are so subtle, the target can often not prove that any of it was ever happening, and that is the reality. Once added to these community notifications, and workplace listings, you almost create a self fulfilling prophecy.

http://www.taginc.com

[quote]
TAG originated with the recognition that organizations and individuals need help coping with the irrational, abnormal, and dangerous behavior of others. Whether the problem is a threatening employee, domestic violence, stalking, a defamation campaign designed to discredit a product or person, an impaired executive or officer, an irrational neighbor or tenant, a sexual predator circling a loved one, fiduciary abuse of an elder, or a kidnapping, TAG meets the need for rapid, expert, confidential guidance.
[/quote]

Organizations such as this probably view cases such as Ms. Hiller and feel that their practices are justified, that their threat assessments do work. The reality is the very nature of these programs are often times driving the end results all over various countries. That is why Gang Stalking targets have popped up all across the internet, and in a variety of countries.

To date awareness has been part of the key to trying to combat what is happening. It took years for it to be recognized that bullying lead to school shootings, more years to realized that workplace mobbing leads to shootings, and how much longer will it take to realize and draw the correct correlation that putting people on these lists are leading to some of these violent community situations and circumstances? You can not put people on lists, and notify those around them, without expecting the harassment and mobbing that it inevitably creates. Individuals have a right to know that they are on such listings. Legally it would give them the ability to fight back, and be properly assessed, but that would likely undermine the agenda that is currently at play.

The listings are often deliberate, they target females and minorities above average. They also target whistle-blowers and those who stand out in some fashion, to a higher degree. Conspiracy sites and extremist sites, are starting to have members pop up with these complaints above average as well. The more outspoken you are, the less you are the type to go along with the status quo, the sad reality is that you have a greater chance in future of being added to one of these lists, by some member of some distant threat assessment team you have never meet. Using these occupational health and safety laws, your reputation and everything you worked for is open to defamation of your character, and the scary part is just like in the former Soviet Union it’s all behind your back, you don’t get to see the evidence against you, whither it’s true or false.

In future as creepy as it sounds, they could even use what people are thinking against them, and it could have no basis in their actual actions. These remote assessments are junk science at best, and dangerous at worst. The reality is they often target people who are being victimized at work and  in the community, etc. These assessments then put all the blame on the victim, saying that the events can’t be proven, it’s all just in their heads, when the reality is the harassment is often happening, and often very real.

The only way this will change is when these lists affect more and more members of society, and they start to encompass a wider scope of individuals, but until them, we are likely to face an increasing number of tragedies such as the one witnessed recently.

The only way this will change is if people speak out, stop keeping the secrets of this system, it’s destroying lives, and it’s causing these end results, that the society then pretends to be so shocked and horrified by.

September 13, 2010 Posted by | Awareness, Black female, black women, Bullying, Community harassment, community mobbing, Conspiracy, Controlled society, discrimination, Female, Gang Stalking, harassment, Minorities, Minority women, mobbing, psychological harassment | , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Workplace zero tolerance laws

I came across this information last week when I was researching some Florida and California laws. Apparently Ontario, in Canada is going to have a new type of zero tolerance program for workplaces. This seems to be a good thing on the outside, but it will most likely create a zero tolerance program similar to what happened with their zero tolerance program for schools.

The zero tolerance program for schools, which was in effect for some time, was used to weed the schools of a lot of young black males. They were systemically targeted by the program, pushed out into the streets and gangs. Most likely also into the police informant programs as well.

Anyways the parents of many of those kids fought for years to bring cases to the Canadian or Ontario human rights commission and then finally the laws were suppose to be scrapped, because they were unfair and discriminatory, in the way that they were used. Again not before a generation of children were adversely affected, but who is counting?

Remember when programs like this are instituted in any country, city, society, they are often hailed as a good thing. Who wants violence in the schools or the workplace? Not anyone that I know. So the Ontarians are at it again. They now have the human resources acting as change agents. For those not familiar with the term, huge New World Order buzz word. Don’t forget that similar programs have been instituted in other areas. Welcomed as a good things, but based on history of such programs, what’s likely to be the real outcome 5 years down the line? More cases before human rights commissions? Not as likely, because the people who will be weeded out using these programs, will be jobless and often not able to go before commissions. The other likely scenario is because they will be booted out for zero tolerance, many might well end up on some of these lists and be followed around and systemically destroyed. So I am being proactive and warning any workers in any city, who had similar programs, watch your back, and get ready now, and not 5 years from now.

Let’s look at some articles that I came across in relationship to this.

http://www.cos-mag.com/201002011792/legal/legal-stories/fonseca-talks-workplace- violence-at-hr-event.html

[“The other component is the implementation of best practices and a sincere commitment by employers and employees to banish all violence in the workplace,” he said, adding that the Ministry of Labour has had “positive relations” with the HRPA, particularly in consulting about various legislative initiatives for Ontario workers.]

The problem with such policies are that they often don’t banish violence in the schools or the workplace. They let those such as Human Resources personnel and others who are familiar with how the system works, it allows them to find ways to exterminate those around them. To get rid of people they see as trouble makers. It will allow them to use the smallest and widest range definitions to destroy innocent lives. It will bring about change, but not the way you think. Having seen how their zero tolerance programs worked in the schools, workers should be on their guard.

http://www.cos-mag.com/201006071889/legal/legal-stories/bill-168-faq-series-chal lenges-of-complying-with-bill-168-part-1-of-3.html

[quote]

Employers may wish to have slightly different reporting requirements depending on whether the conduct at issue is workplace violence or harassment. Given the dangers inherent in workplace violence, mandatory reporting of violence from any customer, patient or client, visitor or co-worker, and obligatory remediation are desirable.

However, there are separate considerations with respect to harassment as it will be defined under the OHSA.

The tremendously broad definition of harassment in Bill 168 means that a wide spectrum of conduct would, arguably, be subject to complaint, investigation and remedy under the policy and program. This could include harassment ranging from behaviour based on grounds protected under the Human Rights Code to much more trivial behaviour that can arise as part of workplace disputes. Such harassment can also be perpetrated by a range of individuals from all levels of the organization. Finally, victims may well have different levels of tolerance for harassing behaviour. To that end, the employer may wish to permit a greater amount of discretion in the hands of employees when it comes to reporting harassment by encouraging reporting rather than mandating it.
[/quote]

The first couple of lines are the most important, cause now harassment can be defined in so many new and unexpected ways that people never dreamed of, and the little worms that know the system best. The worms that are a plague upon humanity can use it to do harm. Don’t get me wrong, if used properly programs like this should be a good thing, but with a New World Order agenda working in the background, that is not likely to happen.

“The tremendously broad definition of harassment in Bill 168 means that a wide spectrum of conduct would, arguably, be subject to complaint, investigation and remedy under the policy and program. “

A wide spectrum of conduct would be open to complaint and investigation. Not only that, but also this could get people as mentioned before put on lists. Behaviours that were not subject before now will be. Remember the guy in another city who was joking with his friend, and said something very innocent along the lines of, oh better hide the immigration officials are here. His friend was black, he was white, but they had been friend for years. Well it was over heard by a third party and he was reported, put on suspension and he committed suicide. That is what zero tolerance can and often does mean.

http://www.news.com.au/world/technician-roy-amor-kills-himself-after-row-over-racist-joke/story-e6frfkyi-1225852471753

[quote]
A HEALTH technician shot himself in the head after being suspended for making a politically incorrect joke.

Roy Amor had jokingly told a black friend and colleague that he “better hide” after he spotted immigration officials at their workplace, Britain’s Mail on Sunday reported.

Although the man was not offended, someone who overheard the remark was, and complained to Mr Amor’s bosses at Opcare, which makes prosthetic limbs.

Mr Amor, 61, was said to be devastated at the prospect of losing his job and shot himself outside his house, near Bolton, England, just hours after receiving an email from his bosses.

The email had asked him to explain his comment.

According to The Mail on Sunday, Mr Amor left three notes, all of which mentioned Opcare.

One of his friends told the paper: “Roy made a joke along the lines that his friend had better hide in case the officers found him.

“It was nothing more than a good-humoured joke but apparently someone overheard it and made an official complaint because they thought it was racist.
[/quote]

If used properly it can and will be a good thing, but too often, it allows these whiny crybabies with emotional issues, that truly never learnt to take a joke, to complain about the smallest things. Now don’t get me wrong. I take the issue of workplace harassment very seriously. I understand full well that sometimes you need a broader definition. Eg. With workplace mobbing, often the examples of harassment are subtle, and it’s hard to prove much less report, and in such cases it might help to have a broader definition. With workplace mobbing, just like with a lot of other things, what happens is that the person being harassed, ends up having the harassers make complaints, and then the persons justifiable outbursts are used against them to have them removed or placed on lists. This will allow a wider range of things to be used against those targeted, when they do justifiably respond back after being taunted. In most cases, the workers feel that they have done a good job getting rid of someone who was a real problem, and the reality all too often is that these programs get used as a systemic cleansing for those that are not sheep.

http://www.cos-mag.com/201002011792/legal/legal-stories/fonseca-talks-workplace- violence-at-hr-
event.html

[quote]
“Today we live in challenging and changing times, both for government, employers and employees. Our determination to succeed is being tested. Our government must reflect the realities of a changing workplace and we must seek to make our workplaces fair, safer, as well as more competitive,” Fonseca said.

Antoinette Blunt, chair of the HRA board, also talked about the changing workplace brought about by globalization. “Globalization means that the world has become a much smaller place.”
Blunt challenged HR professionals to become “change agents” allowing better understanding between employers and workers.[/quote]

Globalization and change agents. Wake up, the New World Order agenda is knocking on a lot of doors, and by the time it has finished, it will cleanse, remove, and destroy the innocent. People have to be aware of this, and figure out ways to legally arm themselves in advance. Consider this your 10 second warning.

Workers need to have the right to know when they are being investigated, and if they get put on a watch list, they have the legal right to know. This program is likely to be used and abused in ways never imagined. Zero tolerance is great in concept, but it should not mean that innocent people get destroyed in the cross fire, and zero tolerance should not be used as a cleansing agent, for New World Order agendas.

July 2, 2010 Posted by | Black Females, Blacklisted, blackwomen, Bullying, Citizen Informants, Community harassment, community mobbing, Conformity, Conspiracy | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The List

The List

How do you get placed on a list?

There are a few ways.

*Someone reports you as a drug dealer, terrorist, pedophile, crazy. They report an incident. A community investigation is opened.

In a normal society this should go on for a few months and be over with, but in the case of Jiverly Wong, this went on for close to 20 years, and in the lives of many others it goes on for years as well, never ending, and it’s used to harass an innocent person.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2009/04/jiverly-wong/

*The workplace. Someone reports a violent incident. You create a harassment complaint, they decide that you are just delusional and decide that you might go violent. A report is filed.

I should add that based on what I have come across in the research, it seems as if workplaces and educational facilities are routinely using this as a retaliatory method. They use it to target people who file complaints. Most workers have no idea that such lists exist.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2007/03/leuren-moret/

[quote]My great-est gift was the discovery of my inner strength to be able to survive the retaliation, mobbing and harassment by the Livermore Lab, the University of California and the Oakland police department.[/quote]

[quote]
I learned that more than 500 women and minorities had filed lawsuits against the University of California and had then experienced retaliation by the University of California apparatus of mobbing by employees, alumni and law enforcement.1The lawsuits were for denial of tenure, whistleblower retaliation and theft of intel-lectual property. These women had similar complaints about the destruction of their own lives and careers. The information gathered by the University of California is used to takeyour life apart; to destroy all that makes you feel safe; to bankrupt, isolate and alienate you from society and from yourself; and to attempt to make you look crazy.
[/quote]

http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

[quote]
Crosty and Murtagh don’t know each other. It is unlikely their worlds would ever intersect, but they have at least one thing in common. They both are victims of an increasingly popular employer weapon against whistleblowers: the psychiatric reprisal.

Across the United States, companies have seized upon concerns about workplace violence to quash dissent. Hundreds of large corporations have hired psychiatrists and psychologists as consultants to advise them on how to weed out “threatening” employees. They say they are only responding to a 1970 directive from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration that they maintain a “safe and secure work environment.” But by drawing the definition of “threatening” as broadly as possible, they are giving themselves a new club to bang over the heads of workers.
[/quote]

This is not just happening in American workplaces either.

*Universities are also reporting people, and filing reports.

In the workplace and universities, from what I have seen quite a few outspoken females are getting targeted. Minorities, and other single individuals. Men that are smart outspoken, and ofcourse the whistle-blowers. Many I  assume who are not aware of the system that is currently in place. If this is the case could informants be specifically targeting non informants for harassment, or using this program specifically to weed out from the universities, and workplaces, the outspoken, radicals, whistle-blowers, non compliant?

From previous research I know that colleges and universities have been infiltrated with these types of agents, along with the normal citizen informants. Could some be working an alternative agenda?

http://www.spying101.com/

[quote]Spying 101: The RCMP’s Secret Activities at Canadian Universities, 1917-1997

If you attended a Canadian university in the past eighty years, it’s possible that, unbeknownst to you, Canadian security agents were surveying you, your fellow students, and your professors for ‘subversive’ tendencies and behaviour. Since the end of the First World War, members of the RCMP have infiltrated the campuses of Canada’s universities and colleges to spy, meet informants, gather information, and on occasion, to attend classes. Why they were there is the subject of a new book by Steve Hewitt.[/quote]

A lot of the targeting starts with mobbing, harassment, the target tries to file a complaint, get’s targeted more. Maybe they say something, lash out, or just seem angry due to the mobbing. This system is being used unfairly, just like we saw with some zero tolerance programs, that were used to specifically target minority children.

http://www.peoplesvoice.ca/articleprint12/02_BLACK-FOCUSED_SCHOOL_GOES_AHEAD_IN_TORONTO.html

http://www.thestar.com/News/article/201456

[quote]While critics are holding their applause until they see the changes, the move is being hailed by some who say the Safe Schools Act unfairly targets black youth and drives them into gangs.[/quote]

Most of the targets seem to come from these three areas. Workplace, Educational outlets, and the community.

In Canada and the U.S. they have workplace safety and standards guidelines that are similar to what is in place in the U.K. Similar reporting systems to what the U.K. has in place.

As we saw in the Jane Clift case, once on a list, your name pops up if you call the police, ambulance, doctors, ect. Employers, Landlords and a variety of others are given similar information about you.

In the U.K. this marker can be something that the victim is make aware of, but in other instances they are not.

In the U.K. this is being abused. Jane Clift being one example.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1195399/Woman-branded-potentially-violent-council-complaining-damaged-flowerbed.html

[quote]Mrs Clift added: ‘What is terrifying is that there is almost no proof required and no hearing to determine the truth of the allegation. It could happen to anybody who gets into even the most minor disagreement with their council.’

[/quote]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1193210/Woman-sues-libel-council-labelled-potentially-violent-complaining-vandalised-flowerbed.html

[quote]
She said that after the council acted, she sensed that everywhere she went, there was ‘whispering, collaboration, people scurrying about’.

‘One time I went to the contraceptive clinic and I felt that there were way too many people hovering about for me than should have been there, making me feel very insecure.

‘It did serve as a reminder that everywhere I went – hospitals, GPs, libraries – anywhere at all, even if I phoned the fire service, as soon as my name went on to that system, it flagged up ‘violent person marker, only to be seen in twos, medium risk’.’
[/quote]

Canada and the U.S. have similar lists, that employers, schools must report.

Most communities as shown before have networks of informants. These informant networks are working with other community programs.

http://www.albionmonitor.com/9711b/policing.html

“Ruling the community with an iron fist. “Savvy law enforcement types realized that under the community policing rubric, cops, community groups, local companies, private foundations, citizen informants and federal agencies could form alliances without causing public outcry.” Covert Action Quarterly, summer 1997.”

blog.aclu.org/2009/04/30/mass-con-fusion/#more-5320

“You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to?”

In addition to these newly formed alliances, as the ACLU has pointed out, they are opening spying on innocent members of our society.

Informants due to various police initiatives are in every community.

So these networks operate and are in place, using the one handed sign language. The informants then feel empowered, they patrol the neighborhoods, and other areas. Since these networks are already in place, it is therefore not necessary to hire hundreds of people to follow one person, they just go about their regular patrols, and once a target enters their place of employment, business, community, or other location, the citizens are place on alert.

To the target it seems as if hundreds of people have been hired to follow just them, but the reality is, this informant network is and has been in place, and once you are on the radar, they just shift attention to you.

Eg. In Stasi Germany a large part of the state was devoted to spying, if the state added one more target, they did not need to hire hundreds of people, the network is already in place.

This can be done with phone calls, I have seen this happen, the community you are in is alerted that a pedophile, mentally disturbed person, drug dealer is in their area. They get phone calls as you pass through the area, thus some will go stand out on the porch to be visual look out, report back what you are doing.

The foot patrols alert the business, thus why we are followed into stores, they use the one handed sign language, maybe stay to see if there is an incident they can make themselves useful for and report. In other cases, they are around to create an incident, and report that.

Keep in mind that the very concept of being monitored and under this kind of surveillance 24/7 is enough to make any sane person act out. Add to this that the informants are told to circle you, sit near to you, follow you, and they don’t try to do it very subtly, a target is bound to notice.

Somewhere along the lines our societies were taken over. We helped. Without firing a bullet, or invasion, these countries have become what East Germany and other countries were.

The gaslighting of targets is illegal. Yet in WWII we saw a government create over 500 ways to mess with Nazi sympathizers. Similar tactics were used under VIK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/aug/19/military.secondworldwar

[quote]BSC invented a game called “Vik”, described as “a fascinating new pastime for lovers of democracy”. Printed booklets described up to 500 ways of harassing and annoying Nazi sympathisers. Players of Vik were encouraged to ring up their targets at all hours of the night and hang up. Dead rats could be put in water tanks, air could be let out of the subject’s car tyres, anonymous deliveries could be made to his house and so on.[/quote]

If they had a game that consisted of 500 ways to harass and annoy, people then, what do you think they have now. Remember this game was invented by a UK government branch, to be used against innocent Americans.

The police, firefighters, community members are all in on it. Just like Nazi Germany, they have this false sense of community, that they are doing something good. Yeah we got that crazy drug dealer out of town. We protected our community. In reality you drove someone like Jiverly Wong to the point that the was capable of mass murdering lot’s of people. Yeah you, don’t you feel good about yourselves?

These programs are not all bad, back in the day, that is what you did. If a pedophile was in town, you took some community action to get rid of the pervert, and never gave it a second thought you were protect yours, and that was that.

It’s a not in my back yard mentality. Even if you move you are still flagged, so the same thing starts again. If each area is set up like this, which many are due to community Policing, and agenda 21, then we will see more of this in the future.

http://www.nikiraapana.com/community_activism.html

[quote]
What is alternative community activism?

When I first started going to my American neighborhood “meetings” I was a complete novice in Soviet style bureaucracy. I was confused and unsure about what was going on. I began by asking simple questions about the terms the leaders were using to descibe their “vision.” This opened Pandora’s Box, literally, because much to my suprise and dismay, my Seattle government representatives did not know what their terms meant either!

I was absolutely floored to find out somebody, somewhere had come up with this bizarre idea that a few of my neighbors should partner with the Pentagon, the KGB and the Mossad, and together they would form neighborhood policing “task teams.” These new neighborhood committees, led by “new” Community Policing Officers trained in communitarianism, were empowered to rewrite Seattle Municipal Code. They claimed revisions to the law were necessary to “balance” our constitutional rights against the “health and safety” of the community. Yet, these “experts” couldn’t tell me the definition for any of their terms, and couldn’t tell me where these new ideas had originated. It took me a year of intensive research to find their source: Dr. Amitai Etzioni.
[/quote]

Though this might be still happening in some cases, the targets I come across are innocent. The lack of oversight of these programs, means that it’s being used to destroy innocent lives. The citizen informants never give it a second thought. Many never see the dirty under handed, smoke and mirrors used to set up targets to make them look crazy, like drug dealers, or pedophiles. They just unquestioningly believe what they are told.

I come across a lot of Woman that are single where this is being used to shut them up, rape them in other cases, and drive them to suicide or mental institutions in other.

I hear cases of abusive ex’s that got someone targeted. If you know how the system works you can manipulate it.

I come across minorities, who feel this is being used to target them. Lot’s of minority men and women.

I also come across whistle blowers. This is being used to target them.

The staged incidents and gaslighting are illegal, but since it’s crazies, pedophiles, drug dealers, who is going to believe them? The moment you call the cops too often, they also flag people. So it feels like you against the world literally. You know you are being harassed and followed, but most lawyers will not help, just like when McCarthyism was happening. The ACLU will not help. These programs do have a specific degree of secrecy, but not so that they outweigh the rule of law and justice.

Again this system is being used across the board, so I have come across people with extreme views, conspiracy views,  where this was used. Anyone outspoken, who is not following the status quo, this can be used against. Just like it was in Russia.

I think legal is the best way to go.

Use the U.K. example, find a lawyer who will confirm that there is such a list in your area, and then try to find the procedure if you are on such a list for getting off. The woman in the U.K. spent four years, clearing her name, and that was with proof that she was on a list. Most don’t have such proof.

Remember each area does it’s own thing, each person feels individually empowered to monitor the target the way they see fit. In many cases this includes electronic monitoring/harassment.

In addition to that, these people try to play James Bond, and in addition to innocent citizens who are just trying to do a good job, and protect their communities from being taken over by bad elements, you also have complete morons, and psychopaths in others cases, who are given access to innocent individuals who in most cases have no idea what is going on.

Pushing for legislation that makes it mandatory to alert people that they are on such lists might help in some cases. This is close enough, that legally we should be looking into this channel.

Remember the ACLU has confirmed investigations of innocent individuals are happening. In the U.K. they have exposed how the anti-terror laws are being abused, to include full investigation of individuals.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/henryporter/2010/feb/01/ripa-act-surveillance-authorities

[quote]A freedom of information request by the Lancashire Evening Post has found that applications made by Lancashire county council under Ripa laws targeted cleaners who failed to show up for work and a care assistant who claimed too much on travel expenses. “A person in Chorley thought to be selling counterfeit goods via eBay, people pursuing false personal injury claims, and a retailer selling furniture not up to fire safety standards were among those investigated using powers granted under the act,” the paper reported.

In last year’s annual report, the surveillance commissioner, Sir Christopher Rose, raised concerns about direct surveillance such as the bugging of public places, taking photographs of suspects and the use of covert human intelligence such as informants and undercover agents. Of course this has always been part of police investigation into serious crime, but it is frightening to see these tactics routinely deployed in trivial circumstances.

His fears came to mind when I read a quote in the LEP from Jim Potts, a trading standards officer, who said: “We have simply recorded that a member of staff has seen another member of staff do something at work, in the way that managers can and do every day.” How easily that trips from Potts’s lips, but what of course he is unwittingly justifying is the informant society. In Staffordshire a FoI request made of the police by the Express and Star newspaper found that terror laws were being used to monitor drug dealers, people suspected of sex crimes, burglars and thieves. In 10 cases police tracked people suspected of minor public order offences.[/quote]

Many of our citizen informants that we encounter on the road, just think they are part of some great powerful network keeping dangerous people at bay. Then there are those who know the real game, those who set up targets. Also just like Germany, you have informants who bait targets, so they can act out. If they do it’s another marker, or jail, or a mental hospital, maybe even death. Remember the more crazy people, drug dealers, pedophiles, terrorists, the more funding, the bigger the network.

Employees and others have been using this practice for years, to destroy lives. Woman, minorities, whistle-blowers seem to be prime targets, but it’s not limited to them. If you read Leuren Mowet’s story, she knew 500 people, who had similar investigations opened on them, which was used to systemically destroy their lives.

If you look at the article make a stink see a shrink you will see that psychiatric reprisals is being heavily used in democratic countries.

If you visit the site Psychologist Ethics, you will see that psychiatrists were even willing to try to have one of their own declared as crazy, just because she blew the whistle.

http://www.PsychologistEthics.net
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1205028541

[quote]MORE ABOUT POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY § ^
When one imagines using mental health professionals to target undesirable individuals, one almost always thinks of totalitarian governments such as the former USSR, China, and Cuba. There is a long and ugly precedent of using mental health professionals in those societies to target politically undesirable people and have them placed in mental institutions involuntarily. Human rights groups refer to this practice as “political psychiatry.”

Victims of political psychiatry are usually people who have filed grievances or complaints against employers or officials, or are union organizers, people who have publicly criticized officials, members of minority religions, and whistle-blowers.[/quote]

But this is now happening in democratic countries.

[quote]CASES OF POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY § ^
Southern Illinois University and the American Psychological Association (APA)

A Canadian Police Department and the Canadian College of Psychologists

Lisa Blakemore-Brown and the British Psychological Society (BPS) [/quote]

[quote]In this case, the psychologist made an unsubstantiated assessment of the faculty member based solely on what the faculty member’s “enemies” had said about her. The psychologist made no effort to verify any of the rumors she had heard and instead wrote them as fact in her reports and made recommendations based on them. As part of the counseling and conflict resolution process, the psychologist also carried on e-mail communication with the faculty member but forwarded this communication to the university’s administration without the faculty member’s knowledge or permission. The psychologist never told the faculty member that there would be any limits to confidentiality nor did she tell her what process she would be following or that she would be writing reports to the administration. Obviously, if there had been any legitimacy to the psychologist’s conclusions and report, the matter would have been handled privately and compassionately by the university’s human resources staff.[/quote]

http://scientific-misconduct.blogspot.com/2007/01/lisa-blakemore-brown-colleagues-weigh.html

In the case of Lisa Blakemore-Brown the damage could have been far worst had not some bloggers picked up on what was happening.

[quote]Dr Rita Pal has weighed-in on the scandal of Lisa Blakemore Brown and the British Psychological Society (backstory here and here). Dr Pal has become an expert on the bullying of individuals by professional regulatory bodies through the abuse of mental health diagnosis after she was subjected to a campaign of intimidation by the General Medical Council [Link to court judgment]. The concerns that Dr Pal raised that led to her abuse (about patient maltreatment in a Midlands hospital – Link) have not to this date been properly addressed. She subsequently brought proceedings against the GMC, leading to a landmark judgment in which the GMC was described as a totalitarian regime by Judge Charles Harris – “Anybody who criticises it is said to be prima facie mentally ill – what used to happen in Russia”.[/quote]

The system is now routinely being used to destroy enemies of the state, people with views and opinions that the state does not like and the destruction of these innocent lives are being done with the help in many cases of other unwitting citizens.

Years of research have been spent trying to expose these systemic misconducts. Others have noticed them in their areas of research, some noting that the best and brightest are beint targeted, and still nothing gets done.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1205738832/0

I still believe that awareness and exposure are still key, in getting what is happening exposed. I do think when targets can afford to do so they should see legal help, but in order to do so, they have to have an idea of what is being used against them.

March 3, 2010 Posted by | Citizen Informants, Community harassment, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking, harassment, Informants, Minorities | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Domestic terrorists. They are amongst us.

Domestic terrorists. They are amongst us.
What does this term really mean?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States
“the unlawful use of force or violence, committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”[2]
So unlawful use of force or violence. By one more more individuals, against a person, their property to intimidate, or coerce, a civilian population or any segment, to further political or social objectives.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have domestic terrorist amongst us. They are in use everyday in many democratic countries.

 

Ruth Goodman

[quote]I am a philosopher/writer who was posting my writings on the Internet for a period of about 5 years, ignoring the online harassment I often received.

I was also contacted at home, in my personal life by a couple of men who work for the government… Brian Kohler, with the D.O.D. (I know this is his real name, I have been to his and his parents home in Fairfax Virginia. His father, Larry Kohler, works for the Pentagon) pretended at first to be in love with me, this was 5 years ago when I was more naive. He flew out to California several times pretending he was going to relocate to move in with me. It turned out that he was lying, and was actually stalking me for counter intelligence. His intimidation kept me from writing on the internet for about a year, but then I went back to doing it, refusing to give in to terrorists.

 

About a year and a half ago I was contacted by another man, Jason Duncan (not sure if this is his real name) made similar contact with me pretending to be a friend interested in discussing spiritual principles. While at my apartment he staked out the neighborhood, and a couple of months later, stalkers moved into the house behind my balcony, built a HIGH wall, and they gather there harrassing me from behind this wall. After one of Jason’s visits with me I became extremely ill (I thought I had food poisening), and was taken to the emergency room closest to my home, very late at night, and was put out with a general anesthetic for 4 hours.

About a day or two later I began to experience people harassing me in my head. I can TELL they are using electronic devices to do so. I do not know where on my body they planted the transmitters, but I have found fake hairs protuding out of the back of my neck and behind my ears. My hairline is not the same as it was before. These tiny hairs come from my temples and go under the skin behind my ears.

These people continue to harrass me in my head, screaming “Stay off the internet” and “we control everything” etc.

They also had me picked up in front of my house by a Long Beach policeman, alone with no name badge, who drugged me, met an LA County sherrif behind a dark building, who was also alone. He got on the freeway. When I asked “where are you taking me?” his response was “someplace fun”.

They took me to a secluded section of LA County Jail where I was brutally beaten, stripped naked, fondled and tortured by male sherrifs, and told over again that “we’re gonna smoke you, n*gger” while guns were brandished in front of me. I was also repeated drugged with something that made me unable to control myself. I was held for 5 days with no phone call until my sister reported me missing. I was then charged with being under the influence of drugs.

Please help me if you can. I am not sure where to turn. It seems they follow me and make sure that people I talk to are also harrassed.[/quote]
Ruth ofcourse died shortly after these events. What brought me back to these stories is the research that I have been doing into the extremist communities. See the government is trying to sell us the next thing to be afraid of. The domestic terrorist. That lone individual that might go off and commit unforeseen terrorism.

However after researching the extremist community, I realise that we in the Targeted Individual community are already dealing with domestic terrorists and we do so ever single solitary day. The extremist that the government are now trying to see are nothing compared to what we are experiencing. If right wing extremists did the above mentioned things to Ruth Goodman, that the government and it’s agents of terror did, she could have gone to the ACLU, and many other organizations to have them investigated and to have the actions against them stopped, but because she was a Targeted Individual, she had no where to turn, and no agency willing to take on her harassers, and eventually she died, under what were listed as unusual circumstances.

Domestic Terrorists use violence and force, to achieve their objectives. As Targeted Individuals we have domestic terrorism being used against us everyday. Many of us do not recognize it as such, but that’s what it is, and our governments, and fellow citizens are using this against us.
Force and Violence.
The force and violence being used against us is two fold. First we have physical violence being used against us, such as when the informants are allowed to use electronic means of harassment. Be it lasers, radar guns, electronic weaponry, the rewiring of the electricity in our apartments, directed energy weapons, or what have you, this is using force and violence.

They also use force and violence when they try to hit some of us with their cars, or deliberately assault us, they use violence when they force Targeted Individuals off the road, killing some and injuring others.

Some of the women in the Targeted Individual community have complained about rapes, sexual assaults.

People have said that their children have been harassed at school, even beaten up sometimes.

Targets are routinely baited, by being banged into, and other forms of physical interference, and incitement.

Noxious chemicals are used to make targets sick and ill.

People’s animals and pet’s have been mutilated, tortured and killed.
Ramona Lopez
http://www.targetedindividuals.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=135
[quote]
“During our investigation, which started more than 10 years ago, we actually found out that law enforcement targets some children in order to get them on drugs or in trouble with the law. It really is a systematic program to keep the drug market profitable as well as a way to destroy whole families and communities.”

Although Mrs. Lopez is still fighting for justice in her southern California community with other like minded citizens, she has been a target along with her family members, the target of extreme government abuse, including death threats, assaults, drive-by gun shootings, gang stalking, breaking and entering, drugged after being assaulted in her home with needles, micro-chipped by assailants and the victim of continuous electronic weaponry.

Not only has Lopez been targeted by covert operatives, but so has her children, as well as her five-year- old grand daughter, who has been micro-chipped in the same manner as Flores.

“I have taken my case to the highest authorities, but nothing ever happens and the abuse continues even to this day,” said Lopez, who said all she ever wanted to do was to help children in her community stay in school and lead a more productive lives. “I have had numerous chips removed by doctors, chips acting as conductors so the electrical impulses they use have a more sever and devastating effect.”

“When the harassment first started years ago, they attacked me with needles in my bedroom. I remember getting up the next morning with needle marks all over my body. I then found out I was micro-chipped. There have been times I get hit so hard with the impulses I feel like I am going to die from a heart attack. These people need to be stopped because I am not the only one around the country going being attacked like this. I have talked to others like me and it is a pattern of abuse and harassment being used all over the country. If they would even do this to my grand daughter, do you think they would hesitate doing it to you?”

Although Mrs. Lopez has been attacked and violated on almost every level, she still is seeking fighting to make her community a better place to live, becoming one of the more well-known figures ion the community as well as receiving several community leadership awards.[/quote]
Ramona Lopez was an innocent woman who wanted to get drugs off the streets and help her community. For that she was Gang raped in her home, micro chipped, set up for drugs, has experienced Gang Stalking, her very innocent and young grand daughter who was five years old at the time has been micro chipped and harassed. Drive by shootings, intimidation, often times by the police? Does this sound right to you?

If this stuff had gone on in the American south during slavery, there would have been some help, some kind of community to turn to, but because this is being done by the state, there is very little help or assistance. But this is true domestic terrorism. Again if extremists were the ones perpetrating this against Romana Lopez, this would have been stopped a long time ago, and there would have been an outcry, but because these acts of domestic terrorism are being committed by the state, and agents of the state, there is no help for her, and the harassment has continued.

Because Gang Stalking is often multi-generational, you see that her grand daughter had already become a target, and will most likely be targeted. If this was being done by extremist to a family decade after decade, by now there would be an outcry, but there has not been.

These people might not be burning crosses on lawns, wearing hoods, but in my opinion is the actions being committed are 10 times worst, because at least society if such actions as crosses being burnt were committed, society would see it for what it is, but in our cases, the crimes being committed against us are sanctions and carried out by the state, our neighbours and communities and they often do not see the problems with what is being done to us.
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1239780728

[quote]

I want to share some details of my experience with gangstalking. This is going to sound unbelievable, but please bear with me.

The worst experience I’ve had so far is discovering that someone somehow came into my home while I was away and contaminated my 11 year old son’s insulin bottles. He was just diagnosed about a year and a half ago with type I diabetes. Anyway, I had been keeping track of the amount of insulin in the bottles, so it was obvious that they had been tampered with when the volume of liquid in the bottles suddenly doubled within a few hours on the same day. It appeared like someone had added water or some other clear liquid to the insulin, rendering it unusable.
[/quote]
Had the mother failed to notice this descrepancy, we do not know what would have happened to her child, and there is no way to tell what the extra added liquid was.

 

Psychological force and violence.
Targets are often stalked. They have false rumours spread about them. Such as being pedophiles, rapists, etc. These rumours leave targets open to physical violence, or assaults.

Targets are often stalked by their community at large, for years at a time even though they are innocent in many cases.

Targets are called names, their privacy is invaded.

Officials such as police and fire fighters are also used as part of the campaign of psychological violence, in some cases to intimidate targets.

They are at times blacklisted because of falsely being labelled.

Their livelihoods are interfered with.

These are a small sample of what targets go through and experience.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/07/361691.shtml

[quote]

FBI surveillance of my son

My son’s account of being relentlessly dogged by the FBI and local law enforcement agents. He and his friend, Kyle, built a model rocket out of boredom one day, as they had learned to do a middle school class years earlier.

Eli endured extreme mental distress during the period of surveillance, as did Kyle. We feel the stress contributed to Kyle’s suicide on 7/2/06.
Eli
In 2005 my residence was entered by two Federal Bureau of Investigations agents and a North Bend Police Officer. Federal Agent William Soulle and FBI Bomb Technician John Hallock, accompanied by Officer Jeff Bohannen, entered my residence and seized several computers, books, papers, scraps of plastic, paint, glue and other miscellaneous items which were related to what they called an “imminent terrorist threat” and would be used to “determine the intent” of the device I will mention in a moment. This would be the beginning of a five-month long investigation which would include FBI tails, line-taps, surveillance, and in one scenario, being stopped early one morning at an improvised roadblock on a rural road.

So, what did I do to earn the scorn of the Federal Bureau of Investigations?

My friend and I, out of boredom, constructed a device to launch a model rocket. A model-rocket-launcher if you will. According to the FBI, however, we had constructed a lethal and highly-illegal device similar to what was being produced by insurgents in Iraq. News of our “Improvised Anti-Personnel Weapon” (IAW), we would find out, would make it all the way to Washington D.C., to both an anti-terrorist task force at the Pentagon as well as to the desk of the President of the United States of America.

It quickly became apparent that we were in a situation with the U.S. Government that had the potential to be highly-volatile, that could end in arrest and detention in undisclosed locations, or worse.

But, how did it get to this point?

The day Kyle and I finished the device, we decided to test-fire it in what we perceived to be a safe location in the nearby area. The location was ideal. It was on a dirt lot away from any property or timber that could be damaged, an area I had practiced target shooting with my bow years prior. It was an area that a lot of local kids, like I had done, visited frequently to light off firecrackers and shoot slingshots without getting into huge trouble or burning something down.

Kyle and I put the launcher into the cab of my Ford Ranger and, followed by my father (who decided to come along to take pictures), headed to the area which was located just down the road from our house. As we pulled into the lot, the ignition switch was touched somehow and the rocket ignited in the truck, filling the cab with smoke, resembling a particular scene from a Cheech & Chong movie. No damage done. At that exact moment, however, a squad car pulled in behind us and turned his lights on.

My truck was searched, the launcher was seized and given over to the State Police. From there, it was handed over to the FBI in Salem. Little did we know, the property I had been visiting for years was newly-acquired airport property. Now it was a matter of National Security, a matter which would produce search warrants and affidavits issued by the U.S. Department of State, and would begin long and far-reaching federal investigations against all three of us.

During that time I was tailed everywhere I went, my phones were tapped, my mother’s phones were tapped, Kyle’s phones were tapped and my father’s phones were tapped. I was followed in the local area, tailed by unmarked cars as well as police, and even followed on several trips to a location three hours south of my hometown. My email accounts were being obviously monitored and about once a day emails would go missing and reappear, or I would be unable to login to any of my accounts during short periods of time throughout the day. The FBI was not making any attempt to conceal their surveillance measures. I almost completely stopped using phones and e-mail, and rarely strayed from preset courses when traveling in an attempt to identify surveillance vehicles. A word of advice to anyone under investigation…everything is surveillance. Fear ruled my life. I stopped sleeping, I stopped talking, I stopped traveling. I started listening, watching and making note of everything–trusting nothing and nobody. If it looked like a trick, it was…and there was nothing I could do to stop it, so I just had to live with it.

Since that time I’ve been afraid to say anything at all. I know that within the borders of this country, if you are intelligent and eloquent, you are to be considered extremely dangerous.

It is after much consideration that I’ve decided to start this blog in hope of sharing things which are of interest to me with others and creating an open forum where these things can be discussed and where our ideas can be shared.

[/quote]

In this case you might think that they deserved the harassment because they built a simple rocket, but think about your own children, and families and what simple actions could start and investigation? Most times all it takes is the word of an informant, or you standing up for and asserting your rights.

 
Committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals
The domestic terrorism is carried out by many people. Often these people who are committing these acts are informants. Some are also criminals who are used to commit illegal acts, actions on targets, with the blessing of their handlers. Some are hardcore criminals who are used to rape, or assault, kill, main, or hurt a target, their children or their pets. Many informants would be alarmed or even horrified if they knew about this aspect of the targeting and the true nature of what they were taking part in, but unfortunately because they work as a team with these perpetrators for the state, they are just as culpable and guilty of domestic terrorism as the true fiends, who commit a lot of the deplorable actions.
http://www.oneagleswingsfearnoevil.com/

[quote]
My life soon paralleled a Hollywood movie: Enemy of the State was a film released in 1998 starring the
actor, Will Smith. Billed as a thriller, it was the story of a young successful lawyer whose life was thrust
into turmoil when he stumbled upon information that could implicate some high-level government
officials. The story could have been ripped from the pages of my life as I stumbled into the political
corruption in North Carolina politics. I wandered blindly into a system beset with  the theft of federal
block grant money, police brutality, and child abuse. Hollywood hails the lives of corporate whistle
blowers such as Erin Brockovich, Norma Rae, and Jeffrey Wigand. They are cast as heroes, but there are
no Hollywood heroes among the thousands of political whistle blowers who suffer retaliation, threats,
intimidation, harassment, and financial hardship on a daily basis. And the Supreme Court’s decision last
year that disallows whistle blowing as a protection under the First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, will
succeed in dis incentives for Americans to speak-up, when the purest act of patriotism is protecting our
nation from crimes against humanity, corruption, and government waste. Democracies die behind closed
doors, and yet, most whistle blowers pay dearly for their candor at the hands of governmental agencies
that were established to protect them. At sixty-two years old, I was falsely arrested with my hands
cuffed behind my back, and tossed into the back of  a patrol car with the orders to”slide your fanny
over.”

The acts of retaliation and harassment against whistle blowers have become so wide spread that some
of the individuals have organized. The organization is known as TI for targeted individuals. Our numbers
are in the hundreds of thousands. We are activist, whistle blowers, and honest American citizens who
love this country and are determined to bring attention to this cancer on our democracy. Our web page
will soon bear the names and stories of the thousands of “Targeted Individuals.” Most , but no all, are
educated blacks and whites who fight for justice for the poor, the elderly, and the youth.

Following my false arrest, I sought help from the Justice Department, the NAACP, my Senators, the
ACLU and the FBI. I sent certified letters to Mr. Mueller at the FBI and to Mr. Gonzales at the Justice
Department at least three times each and never received a response. I am sure that those letters were
never delivered.I traveled to the Justice Department to see the case manager who had found “cause” to
pursue my false arrest case. In Washington, DC, I  was denied access to the building by armed guards. A
Florida senator finally responded to my letter and required the FBI to talk to me. Agent John Rowan
called me quite concerned about my situation, and we made an appointment to meet. When I arrived for
my appointment, Agent Rowan was not available, instead, I met with Agent Griffin who promised to help.
I never heard another word. Agent Taylor in the Wilmington office of the FBI sat across from me with a
smirk on his face and announced that the “FBI is not going to investigate this case,”  even though an FBI
spokesman remarked, “the FBI thoroughly investigates all allegations of wrongdoing.”

My book, “Sadly, My Eyes Were Opened” is being written to encourage the thousands of whistle blowers,
who have been abandoned by government and public apathy, that they are not  alone. When the word
“whistle blower” is “Goggled,”  the site reveals over one million, six hundred thousand hits.
[/quote]
Targeted by police, and other political figures. She exposed corruption and child sexual abuse, but was targeted for her efforts and became a Targeted Individual. Her successful political and business career were both destroyed as a result. She also says that her children’s careers are being interfered with as a result of the mobbing she has experienced. If society found out that a group of extremists were running a child pedophile ring, there would likely be an investigation and they would be demonized accordingly, but in many of these cases that I came across, the perpetrators, move forward, and their victims and those who would blow the whistle are the one’s that suffer, and I have to ask myself, why is it like this? Why is it wrong if one group commits these actions, but society ignores, covers up, participates, when it’s being conducted by the state?

 

Political or social objectives
In this case the political and social objectives that are being achieved vary, sometimes it’s to silence a target. Eg. Many employers are having these investigations opened on employers that will not be silence, whistle blowers.

Sometimes these tactics are used on individuals that do not fit the status quo, and so therefore it’s used to get them to fall in line.

These physical and psychological means work together to achieve the same ends.

We have domestic terrorists amongst us, and in many cases they are those who are working for what they believe is a worthy cause, but in many cases, it’s just domestic terrorism disguised as working towards a worthy cause on innocent individuals.

 

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=69

Anita Belle
[quote]

A Florida attorney suing the federal government alleged that seven car accidents occurring on or around her court deadlines were deliberately staged counter-intelligence program (COINTELPRO) murder attempts. When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal appellate rulings that the alleged COINTELPRO was frivolous, the attorney sought political asylum in Canada. Then, despite undisputed evidence of being disbarred from practicing law without due process, the high court upheld the Florida Supreme Courts ruling that disbarred the whistle-blowing attorney.
Anita E. Belle, a black female practicing law in Florida, alleged that COINTELPRO reared its ugly head against her after she filed cases on behalf of blacks and whites in seven states harmed due to the Central Intelligence Agency or CIAs role in importing illegal drugs into black communities. She alleged that at least one reputed CIA agent admitted the agency conspired with organized crime to use illegal drugs as a means of pharmaceutically enslaving African-Americans. In early 2000, five of her seven cases were consolidated as the Nicaraguan Contras Narcotics Trafficking Litigation, MDL 1331, in the federal court in Gainesville, Florida.
Belle claims that the cases became so sabotaged that she and her family were forced to flee Florida in fear of their lives. She first moved to North Carolina, but left there after witnesses in the CIA cases were threatened. She then returned to her hometown of Detroit, Michigan.
[/quote]

She was just a lawyer trying to protect the rights of people who had been enslaved, due to drugs being deliberately brought into their communities, by their own government. For her efforts, her life was ruined, her career destroyed, her children were targeted, she fled from state to state, then to Canada, and finally to Israel. This is the true definition of domestic terrorism, and it happens every day to Targeted Individuals.

If an extremist group did half the things that were done to Anita Belle, they would likely be in jail, or under investigation. There would have been some kind of outcry, but because those carrying out the actions were of the state, she was ignored, and the terrorism used against her allowed to continue. 
These incidents are not limited, they happen across a wide spectrum and many companies are using these investigations, to destroy employees. Lauren Moret, came across over 500 women, and minority that were being targeted this way by just one company.

[quote]Lauren Moret called it, and what we call it.
 
As I approached the gate with my office belongings piled in my car, I felt an incredible lightness of being. I dropped off my badge and beeper and got back in my car, laughing and thinking, “You just got out of jail!” Little did I know what was ahead. The next 10 years were the darkest of my life and I am lucky to be alive today. My great-est gift was the discovery of my inner strength to be able to survive the retaliation, mobbing and harassment by the Livermore Lab, the University of California and the Oakland police department. Prophetically, an acquaintance coolly said to me a year after I left the lab, “You are in a police net you will never get out of … for the rest of your life.” She was right, but I no longer care because now I am not afraid. 
 
We are controlled by our fears until we have none left, and that happens when there is nothing left to lose. The journey to that realization took 12 years of pain, a sense of loss and humiliation, a feeling of abandonment and the lifelong emptiness and absence of being loved—not by any-one, not at any time. The experience and purpose of being mobbed, and what I did not knowin the isolation of the experience, is that I was not alone.“Mobbing” is the purposeful and strategic institutional gathering of all information about an individual by using any method—legal or illegal. Contact for this purpose is made with neighbors, classmates, former partners, family members, former employers, teachers, church members, good friends and even your family tree … everything must be known about the support system around you that makes your life possible. The assessment of strategic resources and future income (finances, mobility, cars, insur-ance, credit cards, bank safety deposit boxes, post office boxes, wills, health records, birth 

 
Page 3 
Uncovering the Truth About Depleted Uranium49certificates, transcripts and photographs) is made without your knowledge. The purpose ofmobbing is to drive the target individual out of the job force for the rest of their life; the big-ger goal is to drive them to the ultimate self-destruction: suicide. There are now laws made by European unions to prevent this cancer on society and productivity, but it is practically unknown in the U.S.The University of California, which had contributed so much to the State of California and to the global community through the benefits of education, had become a pathologi-cally dysfunctional institution through its mobbing practices. 
 
I learned that more than 500 women and minorities had filed lawsuits against the University of California and had then experienced retaliation by the University of California apparatus of mobbing by employees, alumni and law enforcement.1The lawsuits were for denial of tenure, whistleblower retaliation and theft of intel-lectual property. These women had similar complaints about the destruction of their own lives and careers. The information gathered by the University of California is used to takeyour life apart; to destroy all that makes you feel safe; to bankrupt, isolate and alienate you from society and from yourself; and to attempt to make you look crazy. 
 
Your children are harassed, they come home with belongings missing and stories of teachers harassing them and a weirdness takes over your lives. Slowly, documents disappeared from my house; porncharges appeared on my credit card; files, my purse and my keys disappeared; mail was lost. I was forced to carry my documents with me at all times. All of my university transcripts and diplomas have been stolen from my house.Two things kept me going and kept me alive. First, the warrior mother spirit guided me to protect Zephyr. That miracle of life taught me what it means to love unconditionally and completely. I began to learn to love myself. Second, my uncle had told me long ago, “No one can destroy you. Only you can destroy yourself.”  [/quote]

Again if an extremist group was going these actions, it would be exposed for what it is. Yet this practice continues in society, endorsed, and encouraged.

As Targeted Individuals we are harassed, degraded, tortured, humiliated, violated, interfered with on a daily bases. The actions of our perpetrators are monstrous, and they are indeed domestic terrorists, but because their actions are sanctioned by the state, our terrorism goes ignored. Those organisations that would be all over our targeting if it was being done by an extremist group, sit silently by and ignore and thus silently sanction what is happening to us.

Domestic Terrorism is happening in our countries, it’s happening everyday. It’s happening to you and to me. Do you think that it’s not your problem?

Remember that these acts of domestic terrorism often lead to acts of violence. If you have not been paying attention to the names in the news, several of the shooters over the last several years, have been those who were under investigation, who could not take their targeting anymore and thus took it out on members of society, who were apathetic to their suffering.
Kimveer Gill
http://crimene.ws/2006/09/14/the-blogroll-on-kimveer-gill/comment-page-1/
[quote]
Page 2 of Kimveer Gill’s “fatality666 journal was a little more telling. He seemed to jot things down online, short entries, thoughts posted in passing.

He posted the following in separate entries dated September 12, 2006:

“Stop Bullying

    It’s not only the bully’s fault you know!!
    It’s the teachers and principals fault for turning a blind eye, just cuz it’s not their job. You fuckers are pathetic.
    It’s the police’s fault for not doing anything when people conplain (oops, my mistake, the cops are corrupt sons of whores, so it’s not like they can do anything about it.)

    FUCK THE POLICE

    It’s society’s fault for acting like it’s normal for people to be assholes to each other. Society disgusts me.
    It’s everyone’s fault for being so apathetic towards fucking everything that doesn’t affect them personally. FUCK YOU SOCIETY.”

 
“I wonder why my household has been under surveillance by law enforcement for 6 years now? Makes no sense to me!!”

[/quote]
As some will remember Kimveer is now known for the Dawson College shooting. If you go back however and you learn about Kimveer, many people describe him originally as a sweet and quite boy, this did not come about over night. The changes that lead to the shooting were created, and in time he became a killer, but his history does not show that he was this personality type, till driven to these actions, in my opinion, based on much of the research that I have done into this shooting, and this shooter.

 

Jiverly Wong

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/jiverly-wong-two-sides/

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/jiverly-wong-letter-from-a-ti-perspective/

[quote]
The first I want to say sorry I know a little English. I hope you understand all of this. Of course you need to know why I shooting? Because undercover cop gave me a lot of ass during eighteen years I got seven years and eight month delivery to grocery in the California came back New York on the August 2007. [/quote]
 

[quote]Let talk about when I live in California. Such as…cop used 24 hours the technique of ultramodern and camera for burn the chemical in my house. For switch the channel time…For adjust the fan. For made me unbreathable. For made me vomit. For connect the music into my ear.

[/quote]
[quote]Undercover cop usual coined some nasty was not true about me and spread a rumour to the receiver and some people know me conduce toward many people predudiced and selfish to me…cop made me lost my job…cop put me became poor. [/quote]

[quote]Let talk about when I live at the 28 Baker St. 2nd Floor, Johnson City, New York 13790. It terrible when I live there such as…cop wait until midnight when I off the light and went to the bed. Cop unlock my door and came in take a sit in my room ((cop did it thirteen time on the year 1994 )) on the thirteen time had three time touch me when I sleeping. One time stolen 20 dollar in my wallet. One time used electric gun shoot at the behind my neck. (That time I did not know English) [/quote]
What Mr Wong described was close to 20 years of Rumors, slander, lies, provocations, and harassment often by the very people expected to be protecting him.

He spoke of rumours, those same rumours about a bank robbery, him being a drug addict, a loser who lost his jobs, divorced, etc. When I looked into these stories I found that they were not true. There was no bank robbery, but an informant had said he had a drug problem and was going to rob a bank. They spoke of his divorce, but his own parents knew nothing of him ever being married. He had not been fired from either of his job, but these were the rumours and slander that were left to hang in the air about him after his death.

The rumours had been supplied to the papers by the very police he claimed had been stalking him for close to 20 years. If you are familiar with the techniques used on targets when they are under surveillance, you can read the translation of his letter here, and see that he was very clearly trying to tell us what had been happening to him.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/jiverly-wong-letter-from-a-ti-perspective/

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1239097055

Where was society to make the corrections after his death? Instead even into his death the lies and rumours were allowed to persist. Society took no responsibility for the terror that they helped create. He experienced domestic terrorism for close to 20 years, and then finally snapped, and we saw the end result of this in his shooting of all those people, but nothing is getting done to stop these investigations, they are ongoing and worst than ever.

People are being targeted for being Ron Paul supporters, or even for their conspiracy views. Where are the guidelines, where are the agencies to stop these tortures and these abuses from happening? These terrorists in many cases are being manufactured, to incite fear, to justify the existence of these programs, yet where are the agencies to put this type of domestic terrorism in it’s place?

 

Keith de Roux

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/droege-the-right-and-the-system-in-between/

[quote]Friday said the 44-year-old Deroux’s cocaine addiction was fuelling ‘paranoid delusions’ that listening devices and cameras had been placed in his apartment. The drug addict believed someone was sending him coded messages through his computer and, even after moving to a new residence, Deroux feared people were entering his house through an underground tunnel and funnelling “noxious gases” into the residence. The only person with enough resources for this kind of surveillance, Deroux figured, was his friend and cocaine dealer, Wolfgang Droege. … [/quote]
These killings are happening all over the place, and what is behind them in many cases are the same things. Yet we have a complacent media that just writes of these complaints as paranoia, or crazy.

The ACLU now admits these types of investigations are ongoing, but still there is no responsible agency to curtail what is happening.
http://blog.aclu.org/2009/04/30/mass-con-fusion/#more-5320

[quote]
“You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to?”

[/quote]
Targets are still being victimized day in day out. Yet we are being told to fear extremists? As a Targeted Individual, I personally find the actions of these people, these informants to be far more frightening, abhorrent, and deplorable, considering who they are acting on behalf of.

As it is, we must fight this brand of Domestic Terrorism on our own, we must raise our own brand of awareness, fight our own battles, and keep telling our stories of what is happening, day in day out. Only we have the power to help ourselves, and it’s clear that we must, because no responsible agency is going to step in and do it, and our fellow citizens have failed to realise that this is what they should really be looking out for, this invisible, yet truly lethal and insidious brand of domestic terrorism that they are not told about, or warned about.

Domestic Terrorists are amongst us, but they are not often the ones that the state would like us to believe.
If you want to read more about Gang Stalking, or would like to learn more, you can now purchase Bridging The Gap, which is available at Amazon.com and it’s a nice introduction. Share the book with friends or family.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1441448845

June 17, 2009 Posted by | activism, Baiting, Black female, black women, Citizen Informants, Civilian Spies, Cointelpro, Community harassment, Conspiracy, Controlled society, Corruption, Covert investigations, crazy, Gang Stalking, Gangstalking | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Eugenics and Targeted Individuals

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-targeted-individual/

This is just a quick update of a much longer post what does it mean to be a Targeted Individual. The only thing of warning I wanted to update is that for the females out there, because of the nature of the targeting and what they are trying to achieve you might get more Electronic, microwave, or x-ray radiation slightly before and during your cycle culmination, (menstruation). So be on your guard and it might not be a bad idea to make sure that your shielding is enforced during these periods.

The goals might be multifaceted. Along with the eugenics aspect, the secondary goal might be to induce cancers or other kinds of conditions of ill health. Trying to find out more on the agenda of this.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762136.html

The Tuskegee experiment was not just an experiment, it’s a prevailing attitude the government has about it’s right to experiment on the general population, but more importantly who it can get away with experimenting on.

Remember that program ran for 50 years and everyone had knowledge about it all the way up to the Surgeon General.

[quote]To ensure that the men would show up for a painful and potentially dangerous spinal tap, the PHS doctors misled them with a letter full of promotional hype: “Last Chance for Special Free Treatment.” The fact that autopsies would eventually be required was also concealed. As a doctor explained, “If the colored population becomes aware that accepting free hospital care means a post-mortem, every darky will leave Macon County…” Even the Surgeon General of the United States participated in enticing the men to remain in the experiment, sending them certificates of appreciation after 25 years in the study.[/quote]

What get’s me about this is people are always saying if conspiracies were happening, someone would talk about it, someone would say something, well for 50 years, no one did. It was not just a few people who knew about this experiment, but so self righteous were they in their objective, that they put aside the humanity of these people and went on with the experiment, trusting in the prevailing racial attitudes of the time that these men, their families and children would be of a lesser value, a lesser people. The people who took part in the behind the scenes experimentation were both black and white.

[quote] It takes little imagination to ascribe racist attitudes to the white government officials who ran the experiment, but what can one make of the numerous African Americans who collaborated with them? The experiment’s name comes from the Tuskegee Institute, the black university founded by Booker T. Washington. Its affiliated hospital lent the PHS its medical facilities for the study, and other predominantly black institutions as well as local black doctors also participated. A black nurse, Eunice Rivers, was a central figure in the experiment for most of its forty years. The promise of recognition by a prestigious government agency may have obscured the troubling aspects of the study for some. A Tuskegee doctor, for example, praised “the educational advantages offered our interns and nurses as well as the added standing it will give the hospital.” Nurse Rivers explained her role as one of passive obedience: “we were taught that we never diagnosed, we never prescribed; we followed the doctor’s instructions!” It is clear that the men in the experiment trusted her and that she sincerely cared about their well-being, but her unquestioning submission to authority eclipsed her moral judgment. Even after the experiment was exposed to public scrutiny, she genuinely felt nothing ethical had been amiss.

One of the most chilling aspects of the experiment was how zealously the PHS kept these men from receiving treatment. When several nationwide campaigns to eradicate venereal disease came to Macon County, the men were prevented from participating. Even when penicillin was discovered in the 1940s—the first real cure for syphilis—the Tuskegee men were deliberately denied the medication. During World War II, 250 of the men registered for the draft and were consequently ordered to get treatment for syphilis, only to have the PHS exempt them. Pleased at their success, the PHS representative announced: “So far, we are keeping the known positive patients from getting treatment.” The experiment continued in spite of the Henderson Act (1943), a public health law requiring testing and treatment for venereal disease, and in spite of the World Health Organization’s Declaration of Helsinki (1964), which specified that “informed consent” was needed for experiment involving human beings.[/quote]

So here we have doctors, nurses and a zillion others, who were all aware, all covering up, and all keeping it quite, all proud of what they were doing, no moral authority, no outrage, and even when the truth came out, they felt that they had done nothing wrong, or that they were just following orders.

What really stands out to me, that I discovered recently is that in 1976 Gay men in New York/San Francisco were offered free Hepatitis B vaccines. The thing that really struck me is that on those posters they used this slogan.

http://www.hcvets.com/data/transmission_methods/image/cc.jpg

[quote]Last Chance for gay men to join the Hepatitis B* Vaccine Program![/quote]

This happened in 1976? Just 4 years after they had to stop the Tuskegee experiment. Plus the usual investigations into their wrong doings, which never amounts to anything. What stands out are the similarities with the slogans and the “last chance for free vaccination” line, vs “Last Chance for Special Free Treatment.”

http://www.rense.com/general54/Cancer-causing_vaccinesR.htm

[quote]Unlike most Americans, Africans are aware of the man-made theory of AIDS, and the possibility that the WHO’s extensive vaccine programs in Africa in the 1970s are connected to the severe outbreak of AIDS in the early 1980s.

On May 11, 1987, The London Times, one of the world’s most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled, “Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus.” The story suggested the smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO was responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was held responsible for awakening a “dormant” AIDS virus infection on the continent.

[/quote]

Many people allude to the fact that AIDS started in the gay community, and many of the people who had undergone the special Hepatitis B Vaccination program were the first to come down with AIDS. Also the African AIDS is said to have started after the American outbreak, with people taking part in similar vaccination programs coming down with AIDS first.

If this is true, it would mean these types of experimentation’s that were prevalent and condoned by the U.S. government for over 50 years, might have just continued on in a different form with a different virus.

Again going after targeted communities where they felt that their actions would far outweigh the consequences based on who was being targeted. Those attitudes have not changed significantly, when it comes to experimentation’s as we saw with MK Ultra and other such programs.

There are a large number of females, ethnic minorities targets in the Targeted Individual community. As the post goes on to say the reason for the more women than men, might have a eugenic aspect to it. They might be simply trying to make sure that you can not give birth to the next generation of independent free thinkers, and thus free people. It’s no accident that there is a multi-generational aspect to the targeting.

I thought it was important enough and so I would update you on it.

http://www.thehiddenevil.com/targets.asp

Eugenics

[quote]“For some reason, there are considerably more women targeted than men. Why would women be targeted at a much higher percentage than men? This is another question we may never have the answer for, so this is partially speculation. But one possible answer is that the elite have sponsored eugenics projects worldwide for decades. Removing fertile females from a target population is apparently a standard eugenics procedure. Families such as DuPont, Harriman, & Rockefeller have funded projects for population control.

“It was John D. Rockefeller III who was appointed by Richard Nixon as chairman of the newly created Commission on Population Growth and the American Future,” stated Allen. He quotes Rockefeller as saying, “Rather than think of population control as a negative thing, we should see that it can be enriching.” Allen contends, “Curbing population growth is just part of the Rockefeller war on the American family.”[/quote]

If you are a chic and you are targeted, expect them to try to fry, microwave your reproductive organs, and if you are lucky enough to still be able to get pregnant after that, then expect them to try to go after your child in-utro. If you are pregnant, my suggestion, don’t mention it. If they have not already tried to destroy your reproductive organs, or unborn, then don’t give then reason to.

The thing about being female is you carry all the eggs you will ever have, and if they do fry and destroy what you have, that might be it, well expect for cloning ofcourse.

If you are a guy, expect them to go after the nether regions, luckily guys can reproduce from scratch and it won’t mess up your reproductive organs, unless they use the radioactive stuff like they did in East Germany.

Still you are better off being a guy than a female when it comes to this aspect of the targeting.

May 14, 2009 Posted by | Black Females, black women, Conspiracy, Controlled society, Cures, discrimination, Disease, Electronic harassment, Females, Gang Stalking, gay, male, Minorities, Single, society, STD, Targeted Individual | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 228 other followers