The DT STockton Document Reexamined.

The DT STockton Document Reexamined.

Several years ago someone under the name of DT STockton posted a document about his investigation into the informant system. Quite a bit of it agreed with information that I had already come to agree with, but how much could be verified?

Do the informants really have communication via a special frequency? Are most people in major cities on the informant system?

Are some of the businesses being taken over by government agents?

Informants

http://gangstalkingterrorism.wordpress.com/

The answer to the above questions, in my opinion, estimation, and investigation is confirmed, and then some. The world is scarier than we realize. To investigate any of this information, without being familiar with the informant system or government agencies is almost impossible. For a normal, fairly sane person to try to investigate the information can be cumbersome, but in this community of Targeted Individuals, to stay alive and survive, many have had to become minor investigators in their own capacities.

Threat Assessment Teams, the topic has been covered several times, that’s what the community was up against, for case history, I give you the Jane Clift case.

Her case is exactly what most people on a minor scale are up against. In Jane’s case she was advised she was getting listed as medium risk, only to be seen in pairs, and that a warning would come up every time she was in any situation.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/?s=jane+clift+

The case is what we end up seeing in the Gang Stalking community, on a minor level.

Eg. Threat Assessment Team, evaluated her as a danger to the community, in her case it was the local council, in other cases HR get’s the person listed, however it happens. Once the person is listed, they are monitored by the local monitoring units, or individuals in the community, in her case she was monitored for trying to be a good citizen. Others have complained about monitoring for arguments with those in the community, or workplace, who have the know how to get individuals listed.

Once the local monitoring unit is called in, you have positions in some countries, such as community advisors, unit commanders, shift commanders, who are responsible for the monitoring, of the individuals. The unit and shift commanders or in some cases “case workers” as one liked to fancy himself as, are responsible. In too many cases some are criminals themselves, and organize a deliberate campaign of harassment, against the individuals.

Thus people on the street are literally being given directions, the ones that are on the informant system, or in some simple cases co-workers are being given a warning about the person. Mostly however it’s the informant class, and the government agent class that create the problems for innocent individuals.

Deliberately trying to destroy their lives, and removing them all too often from their existences.

NOw try coming into any of the above positions without being on the informant system, or agency and those in charge have no idea what to do with you. It would be almost impossible to get into a community advisor role, unit commander role, or shift commander role without being in one of these situation, but if you could get into one of these roles, slip in unnoticed, or accidentally come into the role, then those who interface with these units, have no idea how to interact with the individual, because the systems are now creepishly designed to work with the informant system. Period.

Government Agents

Energy

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/energy/

Whenever I read the case of John St Clair Akwei, and what governments are capable of doing, or allegedly capable of doing as per the lawsuit that the signal intelligence agent filed against the government, pertaining to aspects of his work, it always sounds so futuristic, so Matrix like in some ways, but it’s a lawsuit that’s been there for over 15 years now?

The stuff that could be done back then, would scare most people now, but image what they are capable of now, if brain mapping, remote neural monitoring and other situations were common place when he worked for NASA.

http://www.whale.to/b/akwei.pdf

John St Clair Akwei VS Nasa

john-st-clair-akwei-vs-nasa/

[quote]
Detecting EMF fields in humans for surveillance A subject’s bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment, NSA cryptologists can
remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can be decoded into a person’s brain-states and thoughts. The subject is then perfectly monitored from a distance.

NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the Signals Intelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA’s computers will then pinpoint and track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out and track anyone in the U.S.

NSA’s Signals Intelligence use of EMF brain stimulation NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF brain stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MK Ultra program of the early 1950′s, which included neurological research into “radiation” (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development.
[/quote]

Tracking a person via their emf fields. Brain mapping technology that allows you to map a persons mind, but at a distance. [quote]

The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated brain mapping can monitor all the electrical activity in the brain continuously. The NSA records aid decodes individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for
national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for Brain-to-computer link (in military fighter aircraft, for example).

For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain’s auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use
this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations, characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject’s brain and show images from the subject’s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject’s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can
send images direct to the visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves.

NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.
[/quote]

Remember it’s been claimed that this stuff has been available for decades. The lawsuit that brought this technology to light was almost 20 years ago, and this is a person who worked for the agency, and I think with this technology.

If this is being used remotely and at a distance on people, how many people in society might not even be aware that such programing has been used on them until it’s too late?[quote]

Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the U.S. since the 1940′s.

The NSA, Ft. Meade, has in place a vast two-way wireless RNM system which is used to track subjects and non-invasively monitor audio-visual information in their brain. This is all done with no physical contact with the subject. RNM is the ultimate method of surveillance and domestic intelligence. Speech, 3D sound, and subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject’s brain (bypassing the ears), and images can be sent into the visual cortex. RNM can alter a subject’s perceptions, moods, and motor control. [/quote]

Frequency

The informants are contacted on the street with a special frequency, and they do get instructions, if you could hear the stuff they are advised, literally walk really close to this person, we just want to see if he reacts, we just want to see if she has a reaction to it, mostly the average person would just do what they are told, because most do not see the bigger picture. They are innocent in a way, but some are pretty specific, eg. Driving close enough to cause an accident, deliberately, some are all too knowing, and cognizant, meaning fully aware. It’s a scary balance, and I can now personally attest to the fact that they do have in most cases, directions that are being conveyed to them. A frequency is being utilized, and that’s pretty scary.

Could a variety of individuals be on the informant system? I mean to be an informant don’t most people have to be criminals? It’s pretty scary, because in most people’s mind’s informants are criminals, at least in my mind they were, but in today’s society, they get all sorts onto the informant system. I do feel that some groups are targeted more than others, just based on attitudes and mentalities of those that are deliberately assigned with ensuring school children get placed on the informant system. High School and the informant system, jr high and the informant system. Yes that’s the fate of some of our school children, isn’t that nice.

You would think that people have to commit some major crime, but even with just the items I’ve researched online, eg. Rachel Hoffman.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/01/rachel-hoffman-deadly-dealings/

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/throwdown/

Or even the girl who got stopped for parking tickets, had no drug use or drug selling history, from a small town, and was placed on the informant system as a confidential informant. In that specific case, her dad went back with her to the station, and removed her from the informant system, in that case she had a lawyer in the family. The point is innocent people who have no idea how this working, are being destroyed, converted, etc. So when a document appears online explaining that many in major cities are already on the informant system, don’t be surprised, because the above example, was from a small town, and if the small towns are this far gone, then that becomes problematic.

http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking09/Attica_Informants.html

http://www.snitching.org/2009/11/recruiting_new_informants.html

{November 10, 2009
Posted by Alexandra Natapoff at 06:27 AM
Recruiting new informants

Here’s a revealing article in the Buffalo News: Walking thin line in Village of Attica: Would-be informant says police coerced her into cooperation. It’s about Bianca Hervey, a 20-year-old college student who got pulled over by police for failing to pay her traffic tickets. The police threatened to put her in jail for the night, unless she agreed to become a drug informant. Although Hervey did not use drugs or have any connections to the drug world, police told her it didn’t matter–she could still work as a snitch and try to set people up. Frightened of going to jail, Hervey signed the informant agreement. When she told her father, attorney Richard Furlong, what had happened, however, he “went ballistic.”

Furlong went to the police and to the City of Attica and complained about the recruitment of young people into the world of drugs, but the police and the Village Board refused to change the policy.

This story illustrates how snitching has quietly become such an immense part of the criminal justice system. Many cities have policies like Attica’s, in which police can recruit any potential offender as a drug informant–even a 20-year-old guilty of nothing more than a traffic violation. It was this same
type of policy that led to the death of 23-year-old Rachel Hoffman in Tallahassee, Florida, and triggered Florida’s ground breaking legislation on the subject of informant-creation. See post: Florida’s “Rachel’s Law” offers some protections for informants.}

Alexandra Natapoff, has done some wonderful research into the informant system, she is a lawyer, and the above summary is from her. Her statistics more importantly, back up much of what has been said about the numbers, and figures of those on the informant system in most major cities, and some communities.

In summary, it’s not paranoia when they are out to get you, as the saying goes, and it’s not paranoia to believe that too many people are on informant systems, and in or a part of government agencies. The things Targeted individuals blog about, satellite tracking, etc, that’s common knowledge, because their are articles which cover, how local police and others have access to these minor technologies, and have had access for years. The items less well known, but that have also been pretty common are things like the John St clair Akwei case, and the technologies used there. The figures on the informant system are understated, to say that have or above that in cities are on the informant system, is understated.
To say that school children are being stopped, interrogated for minor things, and then placed on the informant system, similar to how Bianca Harvey was, is not an exaggeration. “Weed” children is not a good look, and it’s also, one of the ways these kids in today’s society are getting themselves into these situations, but also at times they are foolishly, and unwisely being set up by their little friends, who are already on the informant systems.

Disconnect

Disconnect

I was on a forum recently and they were talking about mind control. One person on the forum claimed to have had something similar to what was described in the John St. Clair Akwei case happen to him.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/john-st-clair-akwei-vs-nasa/

For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain’s auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations, characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject’s brain and show images from the subject’s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject’s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.

He said that they had implanted images, and I think audio as well, but I don’t remember. What he did say was that the programing that they tried on him failed to work. He had a really strong mind, a belief in God, and he was just a really strong person at his core. He said that they had repeatedly been trying but failing, and I believe him. What I remember about the first thread is that the person who started the thread tried to imply that because governments now had this tech, that this meant that there was no God.

The poster who had this tech used on him, gave a wonderful answer, something along the lines of God being eternal, and just because man had achieved technology it did not eliminate the creator, and part of the reason the program did not work on him, or was not working, was because he had strong core.

I believe that such technology does exist as described above. I also believe that it can work on some people, but not everyone. I think if you are programed by the swill that they put out on the television set day in day out, the radio, all the popular culture images, I think if those are absorbed into the psyche of the public, then mind control could work. Where I think if you used the same technology on a monk in a religious order, who had spent years in meditation, had never watched T.V. and had a strong religious center, the technology would have a much more difficult time working.

So that brings me back to choice. No one is forcing the average America, Canadian, British, European family to submit to the programing. Owning a television, watching T.V. is a choice. Listening to the radio is a choice. Subscribing to popular culture is a choice. Remaining plugged in to a degree is a choice. I know it’s hard to unplug. I don’t think that everyone could do it overnight, but I think little by little we can try to find ways to unplug. Maybe read a book for several hours, vs several hours of T.V. programing. Maybe avoid the commercials, but even within the shows we watching, there is programing.

Strong core families. The things that make our societies more seceptable to take over are a loss of strong core family values, if we have these, we are harder to control and to be taken over. This has to be a cultural revolution as well as spiritual and self. I believe that humanity can be pulled back from the brink of what is being done, but not when we sheepishly let ourselves be controlled.

I hear of people standing in line to willing be irradiated and strip searched naked. I hear of people willing letting their under age children who’s cells have not fully finished forming and developing go through these machines, and with very little resistance. I also hear about parents willingly letting their kids be physically touched by these TSA agents. We spend years teaching kids about good touch, bad touch, how to spot a pedaphile, and then some parents willing stand still while their children are touched in ways that would be criminal if it were any other scenario. We do make choices. I am not saying that the choices are easy. There is a third option. Choose not to fly, if possible choose a time and send a message to the industry that you will not be stripped bear, that your children will not be felt up and taught to be submissive. If people do not take a stand when such things are presented before them, then they have truly become slaves. They are more bound and more controlled than slaves of old who were forced to wear chains.

Humanity can be saved but not if everyone sheepishly goes along with whatever one else is doing. Not if you line up to take your vaccinations when told like good little sheeple. Last year people had a choice of getting the H1N1 vaccine and when people choose not to let the fear get the better of them, this year they put the vaccine in with the regular flu shot and tried to take the choice away. I would like to think that people this year would either opt out of the flu shot, or see if arrangements can be made to just get the shot without the H1N1. For some reasons governments want this vaccine to be inside of the general populous.

Things can be turned around, the people have shown that they have the capacity, but they have to have the wills. People are just giving up their wills far too easily. I know it’s not easy. They keep the average person ground down day in day out. There is just enough room for getting up, going to work, coming home, enjoying a little entertainment and then starting the whole process all over again, so tired, run down and conditioned that most of us are too tried to question, all we can do is feel like we have to obey to keep surviving and that is the control trap that they have sprung on the populations of the world. Keeping them so poor, and distracted that they can not see the bars slowly closing in around them, and those of us who can are pushed to the sides into the realm of conspiracy theorists, who very few want to pay attention to or listen to, but in many cases we are the ones speaking the truth, and we are the visionaries who see the future intended outcome of these actions that are set before us.

Change can happen, but people have to want that change. McCarthyism only succeeded for as long as people were willing to submit to the lie. The truth is out there if you want it. Freedom is also there if you want it as well, but while you willingly, silently, and complacently submit to these changes, nothing will ever move forward, and nothing will ever change.

Workplace zero tolerance laws

I came across this information last week when I was researching some Florida and California laws. Apparently Ontario, in Canada is going to have a new type of zero tolerance program for workplaces. This seems to be a good thing on the outside, but it will most likely create a zero tolerance program similar to what happened with their zero tolerance program for schools.

The zero tolerance program for schools, which was in effect for some time, was used to weed the schools of a lot of young black males. They were systemically targeted by the program, pushed out into the streets and gangs. Most likely also into the police informant programs as well.

Anyways the parents of many of those kids fought for years to bring cases to the Canadian or Ontario human rights commission and then finally the laws were suppose to be scrapped, because they were unfair and discriminatory, in the way that they were used. Again not before a generation of children were adversely affected, but who is counting?

Remember when programs like this are instituted in any country, city, society, they are often hailed as a good thing. Who wants violence in the schools or the workplace? Not anyone that I know. So the Ontarians are at it again. They now have the human resources acting as change agents. For those not familiar with the term, huge New World Order buzz word. Don’t forget that similar programs have been instituted in other areas. Welcomed as a good things, but based on history of such programs, what’s likely to be the real outcome 5 years down the line? More cases before human rights commissions? Not as likely, because the people who will be weeded out using these programs, will be jobless and often not able to go before commissions. The other likely scenario is because they will be booted out for zero tolerance, many might well end up on some of these lists and be followed around and systemically destroyed. So I am being proactive and warning any workers in any city, who had similar programs, watch your back, and get ready now, and not 5 years from now.

Let’s look at some articles that I came across in relationship to this.

http://www.cos-mag.com/201002011792/legal/legal-stories/fonseca-talks-workplace- violence-at-hr-event.html

[“The other component is the implementation of best practices and a sincere commitment by employers and employees to banish all violence in the workplace,” he said, adding that the Ministry of Labour has had “positive relations” with the HRPA, particularly in consulting about various legislative initiatives for Ontario workers.]

The problem with such policies are that they often don’t banish violence in the schools or the workplace. They let those such as Human Resources personnel and others who are familiar with how the system works, it allows them to find ways to exterminate those around them. To get rid of people they see as trouble makers. It will allow them to use the smallest and widest range definitions to destroy innocent lives. It will bring about change, but not the way you think. Having seen how their zero tolerance programs worked in the schools, workers should be on their guard.

http://www.cos-mag.com/201006071889/legal/legal-stories/bill-168-faq-series-chal lenges-of-complying-with-bill-168-part-1-of-3.html

[quote]

Employers may wish to have slightly different reporting requirements depending on whether the conduct at issue is workplace violence or harassment. Given the dangers inherent in workplace violence, mandatory reporting of violence from any customer, patient or client, visitor or co-worker, and obligatory remediation are desirable.

However, there are separate considerations with respect to harassment as it will be defined under the OHSA.

The tremendously broad definition of harassment in Bill 168 means that a wide spectrum of conduct would, arguably, be subject to complaint, investigation and remedy under the policy and program. This could include harassment ranging from behaviour based on grounds protected under the Human Rights Code to much more trivial behaviour that can arise as part of workplace disputes. Such harassment can also be perpetrated by a range of individuals from all levels of the organization. Finally, victims may well have different levels of tolerance for harassing behaviour. To that end, the employer may wish to permit a greater amount of discretion in the hands of employees when it comes to reporting harassment by encouraging reporting rather than mandating it.
[/quote]

The first couple of lines are the most important, cause now harassment can be defined in so many new and unexpected ways that people never dreamed of, and the little worms that know the system best. The worms that are a plague upon humanity can use it to do harm. Don’t get me wrong, if used properly programs like this should be a good thing, but with a New World Order agenda working in the background, that is not likely to happen.

“The tremendously broad definition of harassment in Bill 168 means that a wide spectrum of conduct would, arguably, be subject to complaint, investigation and remedy under the policy and program. “

A wide spectrum of conduct would be open to complaint and investigation. Not only that, but also this could get people as mentioned before put on lists. Behaviours that were not subject before now will be. Remember the guy in another city who was joking with his friend, and said something very innocent along the lines of, oh better hide the immigration officials are here. His friend was black, he was white, but they had been friend for years. Well it was over heard by a third party and he was reported, put on suspension and he committed suicide. That is what zero tolerance can and often does mean.

http://www.news.com.au/world/technician-roy-amor-kills-himself-after-row-over-racist-joke/story-e6frfkyi-1225852471753

[quote]
A HEALTH technician shot himself in the head after being suspended for making a politically incorrect joke.

Roy Amor had jokingly told a black friend and colleague that he “better hide” after he spotted immigration officials at their workplace, Britain’s Mail on Sunday reported.

Although the man was not offended, someone who overheard the remark was, and complained to Mr Amor’s bosses at Opcare, which makes prosthetic limbs.

Mr Amor, 61, was said to be devastated at the prospect of losing his job and shot himself outside his house, near Bolton, England, just hours after receiving an email from his bosses.

The email had asked him to explain his comment.

According to The Mail on Sunday, Mr Amor left three notes, all of which mentioned Opcare.

One of his friends told the paper: “Roy made a joke along the lines that his friend had better hide in case the officers found him.

“It was nothing more than a good-humoured joke but apparently someone overheard it and made an official complaint because they thought it was racist.
[/quote]

If used properly it can and will be a good thing, but too often, it allows these whiny crybabies with emotional issues, that truly never learnt to take a joke, to complain about the smallest things. Now don’t get me wrong. I take the issue of workplace harassment very seriously. I understand full well that sometimes you need a broader definition. Eg. With workplace mobbing, often the examples of harassment are subtle, and it’s hard to prove much less report, and in such cases it might help to have a broader definition. With workplace mobbing, just like with a lot of other things, what happens is that the person being harassed, ends up having the harassers make complaints, and then the persons justifiable outbursts are used against them to have them removed or placed on lists. This will allow a wider range of things to be used against those targeted, when they do justifiably respond back after being taunted. In most cases, the workers feel that they have done a good job getting rid of someone who was a real problem, and the reality all too often is that these programs get used as a systemic cleansing for those that are not sheep.

http://www.cos-mag.com/201002011792/legal/legal-stories/fonseca-talks-workplace- violence-at-hr-
event.html

[quote]
“Today we live in challenging and changing times, both for government, employers and employees. Our determination to succeed is being tested. Our government must reflect the realities of a changing workplace and we must seek to make our workplaces fair, safer, as well as more competitive,” Fonseca said.

Antoinette Blunt, chair of the HRA board, also talked about the changing workplace brought about by globalization. “Globalization means that the world has become a much smaller place.”
Blunt challenged HR professionals to become “change agents” allowing better understanding between employers and workers.[/quote]

Globalization and change agents. Wake up, the New World Order agenda is knocking on a lot of doors, and by the time it has finished, it will cleanse, remove, and destroy the innocent. People have to be aware of this, and figure out ways to legally arm themselves in advance. Consider this your 10 second warning.

Workers need to have the right to know when they are being investigated, and if they get put on a watch list, they have the legal right to know. This program is likely to be used and abused in ways never imagined. Zero tolerance is great in concept, but it should not mean that innocent people get destroyed in the cross fire, and zero tolerance should not be used as a cleansing agent, for New World Order agendas.

Psychiatric Reprisal

The Psychiatric Reprisal

What it is

This was a practice first identified as being used in the former Soviet Union. Targets of this practice were misdiagnosed as mentally ill, many were placed in state run psychiatric facilities.

Thousands upon thousands of individuals were targeted and systemically eliminated this way before the practice was brought to light and drew international attention.

The primary targets of this practice were dissidents, activists, those who tried to exercise their rights, or who wrote or published items that the state did not approve of. Those practicing freedom of religion. Also those who practiced minority or ethnic rights.

The practice was brought to the attention of the United Nations in 1969, and brought some condemnation in 1974, but this did little to change what was happening. The practice continued. It was only in 1991 when change was happening on the world stage, that the issue was again examined in more depth and the practice seems to have diminished.

Russia is not the only country to have used this practice. The practice was also heavily used in China as well. They also used this as a way of dealing with political dissidence.

What was interesting about the research into this practice is the idea that a whole field of professionals can become corrupted and misguided in their views. Believing that any form of dissidence is a mental illness.

She could not sleep that night, and became increasingly worried during subsequent months as more instructions from Moscow appeared on her desk. They were unusual, and what was worse, they confirmed her fears of that very first night: The author, Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, was not normal. Actually, he was ill, clearly suffering from what was widely known in Soviet psychiatry as “sluggish schizophrenia.” And indeed, Gorbachev had all the symptoms: struggle for the truth, perseverance, reformist ideas, and willingness to go against the grain. My interlocutor continued to believe in her diagnosis until the Soviet Union collapsed and the windows to the world were opened wide. Only then did she realize that her concept of mental illness, shared by virtually all the approxi-mately 45,000 Soviet psychiatrists, was what was abnormal and that Gorbachev had been normal all along.

2

What is frightening is the realization of how indoctrinated these health professionals were. That they so implicitly believed the propaganda of what the state taught them to, and were willing to turn this indoctrination on innocent citizens. Just like some of the Nazi’s in Germany, many were following what they had been told or taught to do.

The overwhelming multitude of Soviet psychiatrists either had never participated in the political abuse of psychiatry, had tried to avoid being trapped by authorities into taking part, or had no idea that they were hospitalizing people who according to international standards were in perfect mental health—if such a thing exists. They followed thee criteria that they had been taught by a monopolized psychiatric educational system that was dominated by the Moscow School headed by Professor Snezhnevsky. They had been cut off from international psychiatry and had no knowledge of what their colleagues in the outside, “bourgeois” world believed. If any information trickled through, it was immediately seen as an offspring of degenerated bourgeois societies.

2

Many times we like to view these individuals as evil. Denizens of the state who cruelly and unconscionably tortured and falsely inprisioned innocent citizens, but what history is repeatedly showing time and again is that things are often not the cut and dried. These psychiatrist in many cases apparently did not realise the evil that they were doing. They in many cases were following a criteria, a set of standards laid out for them, by a governing body, and anyone who fell into specific criterias, were automatically labelled mentally ill.

They were part of a society in which private initiative, independent thinking, and going against the grain were, at the least, considered dangerous and were often branded criminal. They were part of a society that was taught that anybody who was different, both in thought and in appearance, was “not normal” and thereby almost inherently was “antisocial” and “antisocialist.” When combined with the theories of “sluggish schizophrenia,” this training made it very easy to convince rankand-file psychiatrists, who had only a Soviet education and no access to world psychiatry, that any person who went against the Communist Party and was willing to risk the happiness of both his family and himself had to be mentally ill.

2

These professional had a limited lens by which to judge, and so they went with what they had been taught, they followed the guidelines without question, and placed people into categories based on predetermined criterias. Could the same pattern be re-emerging in other societies? Could these same patterns be happening in democratic countries? Could health professionals also be following a set of criteria, and misdiagnosing perfectly healthy individuals as mentally unwell, schizophrenic, without having ever met them face to face, based solely on predetermined criteria?

Dissidents were held for observation in the fourth (“political”) department, and in most cases mental illness was the eventual diagnosis—almost invariably accompanied by a diagnosis of “sluggish schizophrenia.” When the investigative commission reviewed the files, the retired psychiatrist recognized many names under the diagnoses: former colleagues, sometimes friends, known to her as good professionals. The diagnoses were composed as though she had written them herself: the same style, the same terminology, and probably the same conclusions. Yet when the commission subsequently examined the 60 former victims in person, she was shocked, devastated.

2

What is really scary is how these diagnosis were handed out and delivered. By her own admission this psychiatrist would likely have put many of these individuals away, yet in person they still remained healthy fully functioning individuals, even after years of surviving the Soviet hell that they were put through.

As I said earlier, after the fall of the Soviet regime we found that the truth about Soviet psychiatry was even more horrific than we had imagined. The political abuse of psychiatry was only the tip of the iceberg. The Soviet regime had ostracized any person who was not productive, who did not fulfill the image of the healthy socialist person laboring for the common good—the radiant communist future.

2

Could these same criteria be slowly getting implemented in many democratic societies? Could this same agenda be making it’s way to the west? Will the citizens of the western world soon experience what their counter parts in the former Soviet Union did? A systemic abuse of power that targets 1 in 3 political prisoners?. A practice that touched possibly millions of innocent lives?

Approximately one in three political prisoners were held in psychiatric hospitals rather than in camps and prisons. Yet, the thousands of victims of these political abuses form only the tip of the iceberg of millions of Soviet citizens who fell victim to totalitarian Soviet psychiatry.

2

The American Psychiatric Association is said to be writing it’s soon to be updated version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and the criteria for mental illness might surprise some individuals.

Who is stalking and why?

This is in respons to two questions that were asked on a forum.

1. Who is doing the Stalking?
2. What is their purpose?

Answer 1. It just average citizens under these Occupational Health and Safety laws. The community is getting a notification that says that the target is insert whatever they have been tagged for. Then the community goes crazy, tries to get rid of target. they use a variety of illegal, community mobbing tactics to accomplish this goal. Since every sector in every city, town, countries, has these laws, that is why the target can be followed city to city, town to town, country to country.

Quote

http://www.torbay.gov.uk/violent_aggressive_and_threatening_behaviour.pdf

Awareness Register – Managers (via, and with the discretion of, the Health and Safety team) must keep details of dangerous customers. Employees must report any potentially
violent situations they are aware of via the Accident/Occurrence form.

Awareness Register

Definitions

Cross-directorate Awareness Register – a computerised database that contains names
and/or addresses of persons (or dangerous animals at those addresses) who have initiated
incidents of VATB against Torbay Council employees or whilst on Council premises. The data
has a digitally encrypted password so that it cannot be read if copied.

The Data Protection Act – legislation which protects an individual’s rights regarding information held about themselves; information held on the Awareness Register must comply with this legislation. An individual has the right to receive a copy (on written request) of the data held about them (and a right to compensation if the information is inaccurate).

Recording of Incidents/Individuals When an incident/individual is to be recorded on the Awareness Register, the Line Manager (or deputy in their absence) will:
· Countersign the Accident/Occurrence form before passing immediately to the Health and
Safety Team; where inclusion is recommended, approval by a senior officer is vital in a
situation should the record be challenged,
· Ensure there is a clear and accurate account of the incident (both relevant to the event and not excessive); officers can be held accountable for their decision to include on the
Awareness Register,
· Ensure only those who are to interview, or visit people, will have access to information held,
· Ensure information on the use of the awareness register and safe working practices is
communicated to employees at induction and regularly re-enforced.

Maintaining the Awareness Register

The Health and Safety team are responsible for updating the Awareness Register on receipt of the completed Accident/Occurrence form and providing general maintenance to the system. No other employees will make alterations to the Awareness Register. Individual managers will designate and authorise, by using form IT05, employees who have been identified through risk assessment by their line managers to have access to the Awareness Register.

Answer to question 2. They think that they are getting rid of dangerous people, but in many cases they are being used like the citizens in Stasi and Nazi Germany were used, and often they are targeting people that were targeted who were falsely placed on these lists, set up to be placed on these lists.

Scenario

It seems that this systemic structure is targeting many of those who are not a part of this system already. So the target has no idea that they are suppose to be signalling and signing to other citizens, cause they have no idea about these health and safety laws. Thus you might have workplace mobbing begin. The target starts to complain, and complain, maybe acts out. The ones doing the mobbing who are aware of this system, then complain that they are worried about the target becoming violent, and then each complaint is documented and reviewed and then the health and safety committee based on the lies in some cases of those doing the targeting, puts the target on a watch list. The target is not notified that there is now a warning marker on their file, eg. Needs to be seen in pairs, has threatened co-workers in the past with violent behaviour.

So all the target starts to notice is at first people acting rude in public, that they are being followed around. Many start to get home breakin’s, car breakin’s, gaslighting, others electronic harassment, most will get the full spectrum of tactics listed here.

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Techniques.html

The targets life starts to fall apart, they try to tell friends, family about what is happening. The friends, family, co-workers in the mean time have all gotten these notifications, all without the targets awareness. In other cases what is happening is that the targets are being classified in some way as possibly having a mental illness, remember this is all without the targets awareness, most have never seen any sort of health professional, in many cases they are likely basing the assessment on the word and testimony of hostile co-workers, scared family members, and friends who want to do anything they can to be in the spotlight and oh yes help the target.

So as the target complains more and more about the gaslighting, people just assume the target is going crazy. Eg. Joe why would someone break into your apartment and not take anything but the milk in your fridge, or why would they just move your table about and not take anything? Meanwhile it’s the community doing it. Most people go crazy when they hear that there is someone on a notification list living in the community. They treat people on these lists the same way they would pedophiles and rapists, and unlike pedophiles and rapists, the targets never knows that they are on a list and so have no idea what is going on.

The police are aware, the lawyers, doctors, but due to the none disclosure agreement of these health and safety laws, they can not say anything. Yet under these health and safety laws the targets information is only suppose to be distributed to a specific amount of people, eg. People in the communities that the targets directly deal with. What is actually happening due to the horrendous lack of oversight is that the targets information is being distributed any which way but loose, and being used to blacklist them. So when they go and seek out help from lawyers, doctors, judges, the notification sets them up for continuous systemic collusion.

http://www.bullyeq.com/bol/action/obstruct.htm

Obstruction to justice
Collusion, corruption, oath of allegiance

Many targets of bullying report that they seem to be obstructed every step of the way in their pursuit of justice. The management refuse to investigate, or use an untrained investigator, or whitewash the case. The union refuses to help, or initially shows interest but suddenly changes sides. The solicitor initially shows interest but then starts acting in a manner which suggests they have the other side’s interests at heart rather than yours.

The employer’s lawyers apply for, and obtain, adjournment after adjournment, then obtain a pre-hearing review which the tribunal chairman handles in favour of the employer. In the tribunal, favour is shown to the respondent (employer) and you get the impression that the verdict has been decided in advance. Your solicitor, the respondent’s lawyers and the tribunal chairman seem to know more about your case than you think they should.

After the tribunal you’re left with no option but to privately sue the employer, the union, and your solicitor, and appeal the tribunal decision, but by this time you have no job, no income, your savings are gone, so is your health, maybe your marriage too, and there’s no prospect of ever being employed again, especially in the professions.

Sound familiar? If so, you might be surprised to realise how often this happens. Mostly it’s in cases from the education sector, although it may happen in any public sector case, for example the NHS. Occasionally, but less often, it happens in private sector cases, and in rare cases from the voluntary sector.

Although there’s never any substantive proof, it seems that all the parties arrayed against you have been colluding in secret. The question is, what allegiance binds these individuals together, and where could they meet such that the normal rules of confidentiality do not apply? What fraternal obligation places their duty to support and protect each other above the moral, ethical and legal obligations by which the rest of us are bound?

Employers, unions, law firms, and employees of the justice system are part of society, and every group, professional or otherwise, contains a few poor performers and rotten apples. This ranges from inexperience through ineptitude and incompetence to collusion and corruption.

Tim Field before he died started to look into this, I think he thought that it was Mason or some kind of brotherhood, but I believe that it’s this system, this structure. Don’t get me wrong that whole brotherhood thing in the U.K. and other countries is a big problem, but these Occupational Health and Safety laws are causing people in communities to act like the brotherhood light.

I believe that this is what is behind a lot of the workplace mobbing, and systemic problems that we are seeing at all levels of society. I also think this is what is behing some of the school, workplace, and community shootings. I also suspect that it’s behind some of the school bullying, because the kids who are aware of this system, and who are a part of it, harass other kids who are not a part of it. The same is true for adults in the workplace. Adults in the community.

I want to give you a comprehensive idea of what is happening with this system. Targets are having their lives destroyed. The Awareness Registry, or program is being used to destroy lives, it’s causing more harm than good in some cases. It’s allowing a secret system, that needs exposing just as much as any brotherhood, or other secret society does, as much as the mafia, street gangs, or cults need exposing.

http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/pub/pdf/C20.pdf

Some people might argue that they would feel more secure if they were aware of the identities of dangerous offenders in their neighborhoods, but widespread community notification actually serves to heighten fear of victimization. In a large metropolitan area, hundreds of thousands of people are notified of a dangerous offender’s release, while only hundreds will come into contact with him in the community. This blanket notification propagates the belief that there are more “predators” in the community than ever before, and fearful attitudes among members of the public are reinforced. A vicious cycle results: widespread notification leads to an increase in the community’s fear of crime which, in turn, leads to more calls for notification. We would also argue that the use of inflammatory language such as “predator” by politicians and officials also works to heighten fear and increase calls for more punitive action.

Unfortunately for the time being people are so attached to this system, this structure that they will fight to protect it. To keep it scared, meanwhile many are scared of some of the things that go on within it. But like any cult while the members are a part of it, they only see the righteousness of it. Just like the Stasi or those in Germany before World War 1. It’s created an indoctrinated people, who are willing to destroy those who are not a part of this system.

It’s very scary to realise what is going on.

The scary part is because this structure is in every country, even when targets move they get no relief from the 24/7 monitoring. Remember they are getting monitored similar to how people got monitored in Stasi Germany. Neighbours moving in above, below, to the side of them. Neighbours who keep quite, do and allow illegal things to happen. Behind the targets back tactics that would put Cointelpro to shame are being employed, by using these Occupational safety and health laws to violate the targets rights, privacy, and to unduly influence those the target might wish to socialize with or form business associations.

What most people do not realise is that this system is being used to target whistle-blowers, the outspoken, independent thinkers. I believe it’s in part being used as a clearinghouse for the NWO. Meaning, the next time some anti-establishment type get’s out of line, they will be dealt with the same way, put on the notification system, and have their lives blacklisted to hell. This system can affect your ability to find housing, jobs, and to basically have an real social contacts, cause everyone you are in contact with is poisoned by these notifications. The information does not have to be true, it’s often one sided reports by people who have ulterior motives. If some girl is on a notification list, some guy tries to make a move on her, she forcefully stops him, knowing that she is on a list, he could just lie and say that she just attacked him out of the blue. The citizen that are aware of these notifications are using them in highly illegal ways.

Some of the things that are happening, if they happened in North Korea, or Iran people in these countries would be outraged, but because they are happening here, people are happy to sit by and defend the system, they are so indoctrinated, they only see the good, and you can not tell them otherwise, till they are ready to understand the truth.

Targets have travelled to many countries to try to find escape only to find out that the information on these notification systems follow them around. I have spent many years researching these notification systems, from the outside in. I never knew this structure existed. It was after becoming a target, that I realised something was wrong, I also experienced the systemic destruction, and have spent years researching, trying to figure out what was happening. The community had a break last year with the Jane Clift case, and that is where the research finally lead.

http://www.1brickcourt.com/files/cases/140CLIFT_58136.pdf

Awareness Register

http://www.torbay.gov.uk/violent_aggressive_and_threatening_behaviour.pdf

In Torbay Council the name of the program that keeps a record of all the targets is called the Awareness Register.

[quote]

Managers (via, and with the discretion of, the Health and Safety team) must keep details of dangerous customers. Employees must report any potentially
violent situations they are aware of via the Accident/Occurrence form.

Awareness Register

Definitions

Cross-directorate Awareness Register – a computerised database that contains names and/or addresses of persons (or dangerous animals at those addresses) who have initiated incidents of VATB against Torbay Council employees or whilst on Council premises. The data has a digitally encrypted password so that it cannot be read if copied.

The Data Protection Act – legislation which protects an individual’s rights regarding information held about themselves; information held on the Awareness Register must comply with this legislation.]An individual has the right to receive a copy (on written request) of the data held about them (and a right to compensation if the information is inaccurate).

Recording of Incidents/Individuals When an incident/individual is to be recorded on the Awareness Register, the Line Manager (or deputy in their absence) will:
· Countersign the Accident/Occurrence form before passing immediately to the Health and Safety Team; where inclusion is recommended, approval by a senior officer is vital in a situation should the record be challenged,
· Ensure there is a clear and accurate account of the incident (both relevant to the event and not excessive); officers can be held accountable for their decision to include on the Awareness Register,
· Ensure only those who are to interview, or visit people, will have access to information held,
· Ensure information on the use of the awareness register and safe working practices is communicated to employees at induction and regularly re-enforced.

Maintaining the Awareness Register

The Health and Safety team are responsible for updating the Awareness Register on receipt of the completed Accident/Occurrence form and providing general maintenance to the system. No other employees will make alterations to the Awareness Register. Individual managers will designate and authorise, by using form IT05, employees who have been identified through risk assessment by their line managers to have access to the Awareness Register.

Once a person, or address, has been placed on the register it will be reviewed for accuracy at six monthly intervals by the Health and Safety team and removed at the end of the expiration of the following periods where the threat to employees no longer exists:

Physical assault After 5 years Verbal threats and a person reasonably fears
for their own or another’s safety Review after 2 years Verbal abuse and a person reasonably fears for their own or another’s safety Review after 1 year The above limits will be halved where persons committing the incident were under the age of 17 at the time.

If there are multiple reports attributed to one person, a person’s name will be held on the register from the date of the last report.
The Health and Safety Team are responsible for monitoring issues concerning VATB, by reporting to the Health, Safety and Risk Management Forum.

[/quote]

Do you know and can you imagine how many lives and targets might have been saved if they just knew that they were on some kind of  notification system? Instead their potential was allowed to be destroyed, while the parasites of society were allowed to feed on them. I don’t think that this is ok at all. I don’t think that the things that have happened are ok. I doubt these people will ever show any remorse for what has been done. The majority of the Stasi showed no remorse, and many Germans in WWI apparently saw what happened during Hitler’s reign as a good thing.

All targets can do is use the legal means at their disposal to try to get some kind of justice. Here are a few places to start.

Policies

http://www.osha.gov/
United States

http://www.ccohs.ca/
Canada

http://australia.gov.au/topics/health-and-safety/occupational-health-and-safety
Australia

http://osha.europa.eu/en
Europe
Lawyers.

Targets at this stage might just wish to focus on Privacy Lawyers, Labour Lawyers, Occupational health and Safety Lawyers, and maybe in the future human rights lawyers.

FOIA

The Occupational Health and Safety laws are the ones that are being used to enact this Program against our lives, so this would be the best place to start for Freedom Of Information Act request. Privacy commissioners might also be able to provide some useful and helpful information.

Community Health and safety is another name that often comes up in regards to the people who make the decisions.

What has happened to targets has been so unspeakably wrong, I am not sure that what has gone past will ever be corrected. In 30 years maybe some politician will look back at the lives these programs stole, the livelihoods, and issue some official apology, but it will never make up for what has been done.

Like others who have gone through similar times, we just have to do what we can. Many of the targets of the Stasi never regained what was lost, they never saw justice. Even though Cointelpro was recognized as an evil program, a lot of those targets still wound up in jail, died, or still are remembered in a negative light. What justice we can get we must find for ourselves. Making sure the stories are heard, the stories are some of the strongest weapons, for recording keeping of this evil time.

Till then targets must do what they can to raise awareness about this system, and how it destroys lives. What has been done is not ok, but Targets must find ways to move forward. Activism is a really good way to begin to heal. By healing others, sharing what you know, ensuring that others do not go through the same experience are some of the things that can be done.

I think those on the other side of the fence really do not have the capacity to understand what they did, and how truly horrible it was. It will never be ok, but I do believe that targets can find ways to heal, and move forward. Many targets of bullying, and even workplace mobbing have gone on to successfully start forums, write books, and help others avoid a similar fate, and those are some additional things that targets can do to help facilitate the healing process.

Healing is subjective, and it takes time, but I think it is possible, but it will not happen by covering up what has gone past, only by shining a light on what has happened, denouncing this program for what it was, can targets begin to remove so much of the devastation, and destruction that has crossed our individual lives.

For me there were so many times that I heard the stories of those in the community, our women getting attacked, assaulted, raped etc. Some of the men getting defamed, made to look like what they were not, and there was little that could be done, aside from trying to get others to understand, and care about what was happening. While the media wrote stories about how crazy our community was, while many of us battled it out on forums, with questions like: ‘why would someone spend so much time and money’, or snide remarks like, ‘oh you are not that important, what a big ego you must have.’ All this while many of our lives continued to be systemically destroyed and devastated. While so many innocent people, and their families fell by the way side.

This was truly something horrible to behold, and I don’t want anyone reading this to think it was something else, or to diminish what targets went through. Worst than the inability to help, was knowing that many of our counterparts knew exactly what was going on and would not help. Others did what they could, but so many targets went to lawyers, doctors, police, detectives, and no help in sight to end the torment that targets experienced.

What society really does this, and calls themselves a moral society? I understand the community need to feel safe, I even agree that people should be given warnings about dangerous situations, but to systemically destroy innocent people? Then to act like you have the best most unblemished human rights record around, what a joke. This might not have been officially sanctioned by the state, but every time a target cried out for aid, assistance, and a blind eye was turned, or their plea was used as a reason to further gaslight them, it was a form of consent, and it was wrong.

I meant for this to be a really short post, just a few words about where targets needed to do, which direction might best suite their needs, but I could not keep silent about how wrong this was. I understand that many in the situation felt that they were doing the right thing, following orders, etc, it’s the same excuses used in every time period.

I remain prayerful and hopeful. I am not delusional enough to think that this is over with, targets have a long way to go, but I hope some of this new information that has been unearthed, and uncovered will be of help.

I hope that the endless hours of research, digging, searching, can be used to help some of the innocent targets get what they can of their lives back. We were not in jails in the traditional sense, yet our careers in many cases, potential, livelihoods were bound, and diminished by this system. This system that saw us as less than in some cases, when that was  far from the truth. In other cases, our lives were destroyed because the system saw us as threats, people with too much potential, whistle-blowers, and others who they wanted to keep silent, and none of this has been ok.

I am disappointed that a country I once loved very much could do this to it’s own citizens. When I grew up, I honestly believed that only other countries acted in this way, and did such things to their citizens. I honestly believed that I was so lucky in where I lived, and where I grew up. I believed that people around me would never do things that I grew up hearing about in other countries. I honestly believed we were better than that, now I see that all humanity is susceptible to the same weaknesses.

This experience has really opened my eyes. Awareness Registry, I guess because everyone targeted by this system, becomes aware. Anyways this system will have different names for other locations, but the concept will be the same. I am sure that it’s had many friendly names throughout history, but the end results are always the same. In researching history, it’s not hard to see that this is a pattern that is constant, consistent, continual, something in the human nature just needs to repeat this pattern. Witch trials, inquisitions, Crucifixions, etc, it’s all the same. Why we don’t learn, why we have to repeat? I am not sure. I guess it’s because each generation starts fresh, they are told the basics, but the subtle aspects of what brought about those times, seem to be left out of the history books, and so each generation must relearn those lessons, and it’s hoped in time come to see that their actions were wrong.

Till then those who remain, must pick up what they can of the pieces, and try to keep enough history for the future generation, and those who again will see such times.

It’s in their nature

The Scorpion and the Frog

One day, a scorpion looked around at the mountain where he lived and decided that he wanted a change. So he set out on a journey through the forests and hills. He climbed over rocks and under vines and kept going until he reached a river.

The river was wide and swift, and the scorpion stopped to reconsider the situation. He couldn’t see any way across. So he ran upriver and then checked downriver, all the while thinking that he might have to turn back.

Suddenly, he saw a frog sitting in the rushes by the bank of the stream on the other side of the river. He decided to ask the frog for help getting across the stream.

“Hellooo Mr. Frog!” called the scorpion across the water, “Would you be so kind as to give me a ride on your back across the river?”

“Well now, Mr. Scorpion! How do I know that if I try to help you, you wont try to kill me?” asked the frog hesitantly.

“Because,” the scorpion replied, “If I try to kill you, then I would die too, for you see I cannot swim!”

Now this seemed to make sense to the frog. But he asked. “What about when I get close to the bank? You could still try to kill me and get back to the shore!”

“This is true,” agreed the scorpion, “But then I wouldn’t be able to get to the other side of the river!”

“Alright then…how do I know you wont just wait till we get to the other side and THEN kill me?” said the frog.

“Ahh…,” crooned the scorpion, “Because you see, once you’ve taken me to the other side of this river, I will be so grateful for your help, that it would hardly be fair to reward you with death, now would it?!”

So the frog agreed to take the scorpion across the river. He swam over to the bank and settled himself near the mud to pick up his passenger. The scorpion crawled onto the frog’s back, his sharp claws prickling into the frog’s soft hide, and the frog slid into the river. The muddy water swirled around them, but the frog stayed near the surface so the scorpion would not drown. He kicked strongly through the first half of the stream, his flippers paddling wildly against the current.

Halfway across the river, the frog suddenly felt a sharp sting in his back and, out of the corner of his eye, saw the scorpion remove his stinger from the frog’s back. A deadening numbness began to creep into his limbs.

“You fool!” croaked the frog, “Now we shall both die! Why on earth did you do that?”

The scorpion shrugged, and did a little jig on the drownings frog’s back.

“I could not help myself. It is my nature.”

Then they both sank into the muddy waters of the swiftly flowing river.

After dealing with citizen informants and workplace mobbing and Gang Stalking over the last several years, this is the only conclusion that I can come to. It’s in their nature.

Before I go further, I would like to add, this is not the method of all informants, but it’s the method of too many. There are citizen informants that don’t take joy in what’s happening with this system. Those who have been kind and helpful. Those who have decency left. Those that shared what they could. For that nature I am, have been, and will continue to be truly grateful. For the rest this is what I think.

Telling lies. It’s in their nature.

Setting People up. It’s in their nature.

Seeing the bad in others, but never in this system or in themselves. It’s in their nature.

Destroying people’s lives. It’s in their nature.

Parasitically feeding off of the lives of others. It’s in their nature.

Stirring up trouble. It’s in their nature.

People tend to think of Targets as reserved or anti-social, but most targets are far from it. After years of bad advise, bad information, situation after situation, and person after person that we could not trust, many targets have learnt. Being cautious has become a part of our nature. Most targets are cautious. Most targets are hypervigilant.

For me personally I have learnt not to trust them in many cases. The smallest thing with informants can and will be taken out of context, misconstrued, deliberately, or accidentally, but it does not matter because the end result for the target could be the same. Institutionalization, jail, loss of employment, loss of housing, loss of a friendship or loss of reputation.

The times I have tried to be helpful with informants, or have become overly friendly are the times that I have often suffered the most, and thus for the most part I keep my distance, for many of them can not be trusted.

The thing that is most alarming about this system is that, all it takes is the word of an informant to convict you, or destroy your life. That is the informant culture that we live in today, and many of them can not be trusted.

The scary part for me is that even when it becomes clear that one of them lied, or deliberately tried to do something destructive, the majority of informants just pass it off as something simple. They are willing to crucify the targets, but are fully willing to forgive each other. I guess that is how gangs, cults, and secret societies work. They over look the evils that the cult, gang, club members do, but are willing to destroy others for way less.

The nature does not change. No matter how many times false rumours occur, they willing believe one after the other. The target is never consulted. No matter how much slander gets put out about the target, they are often willing to swallow the next dose, almost as if it’s the medicine that keeps them going. I am no longer surprised by this. I just shake my head and move on, past the meaningless “I am sorry’s.” Because much like someone in an abusive relationship, they are only sorry till it happens the next time, and as a target you know that there will be a next time.

Thus I have learnt to limit my interactions with them. The lies that they make up out of thin air are bad enough, but I find that it’s best to interact with them on a limited basis, giving them as little ammunition to work with as possible. For it’s in their nature to be lying, deceitful. This system does not produce good citizens. Good citizens produce good citizens. This system teaches people to lie, cheat, steal, set people up, and destroy lives.

The other crazy thing is that as many times over the years that rumours or slander has started, the citizen informants for the most part make very little effort to confirm or deny what they are hearing. This extends to employers, landlords, and others that you have to interact with. You can be fired from jobs, lose housing, all based on lies that you might never find out about, unless you gain access to your files. It’s incredible the lies the informants are allowed to make up, which never get corrected, and are out there on a person. Jiverly Wong is a great example, of rumours, lies, slander and gossip. If people had taken the time to let him know what was being said, to break their silence, so he could clear his name, I think a tragedy might have been averted. Instead they all went along with it, because it’s in their nature, and with dire consequences.

With all that I have seen over the years, I do realise that this is their nature, and interacting on a limited basis with the majority of them is the best option. I have walked into places with people who were very friendly one day, and very cold and distant the next, busy feeding on the latest lie, slander, ready to carve into the target, ready to believe the worst. Not even willing to give a hint as to what the crime or offence committed was, because naturally you should know and thus must already be guilty. I have just learnt to smile, nod, and just avoid them. Then the odd time when information get’s corrected, they smile and act as if nothing happened. Coming over and being overly bright and happy. It’s very hypocritical, but it’s in their nature. After the last several years, I have adapted my nature to deal with such unstable people.

Imagine being a target you go to a church, work, school, you leave one day, on good terms, you come in the next day and suddenly you are enemy number one, no explanation, no hint, all eyes and hate upon you, you are already convicted, and tried without ever knowing what the crime is. Those around all too ready to feed on who they see as deserving of their wrath or punishment. That is the nature and pathology of these people. That is what targets go through on a daily, weekly, monthly basis, yearly, basis.

In my experience being around them for lengths of time makes very little difference, you would think that after the 5th false rumour, 10th, 20th, that these people would start to question the lies? No they are simple people. They believe each other, trust each other, no one would ever have an ulterior motive, no one would ever lie. They think so well of the club members, but from what I have seen of many of these club members, a lot of them lie, some are criminal informants and thus have a handler, some seem to be deliberately working for the psychological operation angel, and then some are just average gullible people, who get taken in with every new rumour, others are just nasty and looking for the dirt that they can find on someone else. Gossip and drama queens, men and woman, who are not happy unless they are feeding on the lives of others, and that is because it’s in their nature.

To defend yourself against such is a continuous uphill battle. Thus most targets simply choose to interact, but on a very limited basis.

The targets are not asked to give their side, pulled in for an interview, the witnesses around them are questioned, but the target is often even unaware that an incident has happened. If this system was the good system that many try to make it out to be, the targets of this system would have a chance and format to get their side heard. Before an incident can be added to a targets file, they must get some kind of notice and a suitable amount of time to clear their file. Most at this stage don’t even realise that they have a file, or how to access the information.

The way this system works is that normal actions are seen as disturbing. Things that others get away with in public, actions that most targets would be put away for, are taken for granted, and the community over reacts to the smallest incident. A type of mania in and of itself. A frenzy, only this type of frenzy is destroying the lives of innocent people, who often times have no idea as to why.

Community Notifications and Gang Stalking

At this stage it’s assumed that the targets friends or family are contacted via mail or some other method, given the notification, and then they probably have some kind of confidentially agreement or none disclosure agreement that they have to adhere to. Via Occupation health and safety workers have the right to know how to protect themselves from individuals who have a history, or who have displayed inappropriate or violent behaviour.

To give you an idea of the emotional impact that keeping quite on a similar topic would have, there was a story in the paper about a man who received a national security letter. This is completely different than a none disclosure agreement. He emotional felt like he was having a breakdown by not being able to say anything to his girlfriend, and was often forced to lie. That’s the sort of impact that sort of required confidentially can have on an individual.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/22/AR2007032201882.html

What targets are asked to sign once they get notification would be more of a none disclosure agreement.

[quote]Not only will this program used the civil servant already mentioned, but it will expand who is used in the program. They will have secret sources of communication available to them. The members of these programs will connect with the fusion centers. None disclosure agreement or a confidential disclosure agreements will be signed by many in these programs to ensure that the information is protected.[/quote]

They might feel empowered to make a citizens arrest even. The workers would be trained in proper methods of communicating safety codes and sign language. I know this notification system is suppose to be a wonderful thing, but parts of it remind me of my research on the Stasi and how the one handed sign language was used there. Eg. Snitches were taught the one handed sign language and then they too became a part of the system.

They use this secret code the same way any cult does, Gang, or secret society does and for those on the outside they are harassed, or the citizens who have been taught these health and safety signs choose not to work with those who are not a part of the system. In England where Masons used a similar structure of silence and secrecy, they are now forced to disclose if they are Masons, because the allegiance went above and beyond the loyalty to the law and in many cases maybe even above and beyond doing what was right.

http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/britishmasons.html

[quote]The following instruction sets out guidance governing the membership by members of the armed forces of societies such as freemasons: there is no intention or policy to preclude service personnel from membership of any lawful and benevolent organisation. However, involvement in organisations of a secretive nature, such as the freemasons, carries with it the risk of establishing disparate loyalties which may have a destabilising influence on the chain of command, not least by the perception of preferential treatment and undue influence. While membership of such organisations is clearly a matter for the individuals concerned, serving personnel should not encourage or promote membership amongst their colleagues, meetings should not be held on MOD premises, and use should not be made of any MOD property.

Ministry of Defense
United Kingdon
New 2001 Department Policy on Freemasonry in the Military
[/quote]

This is nothing against Masons, I am just pointing out that in the U.K. it became a real problem and disclosure for a time became mandatory.That recently changed for Judges again, where it’s no longer mandatory.

http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/phpnews/show_news.php?uid=154

I also suspect, but at this stage can not prove that this is probably what triggers some of the bullying in schools, and the mobbing in the workplace. Targeting those not taking part in this system.  “However, involvement in organisations of a secretive nature, such as the freemasons, carries with it the risk of establishing disparate loyalties which may have a destabilising influence on the chain of command, not least by the perception of preferential treatment and undue influence. ” Preferential treatment for members of the one handed sign language gang would be bad enough, but they are bullying, mobbing, harassing and systemically destroying those who are not a part of this and that is wrong.

I have and can bear witness of this preferential treatment for these club members or whatever they think of themselves as, and it’s not a club that I want anything to do with, because I have seen what they do to none club members, the last decade of my life has been a testament to that. In court hearing they try to use this to influence judges to curry favor, by identifying themselves as part of this program (system). It also happens in everyday life, like waiting and keeping a bus door open for someone who is a member vs someone who is not. I get that people want to support others who are part of this structure, remember the majority of people think that this is a good thing. There are aspects of this that are good, don’t get me wrong. A community coming together to look after itself and protect itself can be a beautiful thing, but from the side that I have lived, it’s been a nightmare, and no one should have to experience such systemic destruction. This happened to me because officially because I fought back about some workplace harassment, but unofficially I think someone who knew how this system worked had a grudge against someone else used it to get revenge. Eg. If you know how this system works, you provoke the person till they yell or lash out, bait them, then report them. Get them flagged.

After spending over 10 years mobbed, and Gang Stalked, I can truly say that this is the most evil thing that I have ever seen.

I also believe that this is similar to the end time structure. What I have seen of the conformaty, the way they try to bully people to take part reminds me of that same structure that has been spoken about.

Right now what happens to targets is their lives are systemically destroyed. People don’t want to work with them etc. The end time structure is not just a mark of (the beast) a person, it’s also a system were you can not buy, trade, sell without it. This notification system is conditioning people to comply, and to harass those who are not complying, or taking part with this system.

I think in a generation, they could socially condition people to believe that only those with the external mark in the forehead or hand are people who they should do business with, and what socially they can not enforce, there will be laws to back up.

Thousands of people are being eliminated from communities, usually the outspoken, and others, those not falling in line, via these notification systems. Can you imagine how many innocent people are in jails, institutions, homeless, committed suicide, or killed people because of this system? Will there ever be an apology? Will they review the files of those in mental wards who claimed that they were being followed around? The police and other agency reports of Gang Stalking?

People want the elites to take responsibility for their actions, but what about taking responsibility for their own individual actions? No it’s far easier to say that an authority figure made me do it and I was just following orders. That excuse worked in Germany as well, it’s the same types of structures repeating, where people get rid of those that  they are told are undesirable.  You get an excuse to do mean things to those the state has a problem with.

I can’t right the wrongs of the past, but I would ask that those in the know do something, ask for a review of this system, because the way it’s working right now, is not right. The systemic destruction of innocent individuals is just wrong, and the way it’s being used in that capacity is just evil.

Secret Society

Secret Society.

You hear a lot about this online, and people complain about secret societies, but I have been watching these citizens informants use their one handed sign language in a similar pattern and I am thinking, how can you complain about secret societies, when you are using this system the same way?

I have seen on several occasions the citizen informants use their secret signals to identify each other and do little favors or boons for each other that they would not do for others. On a more lethal level I have watched it be used to socially influence others from not doing business with a target, and I am thinking, how hypocritical. People complain about secret societies, secret codes, and how legal cases are won at the turn of special signals and so forth, but then they try to use this system in the same way. To control others, to destroy others, and I am amazed.

The other thing that I wanted to quickly address was the issue of bullying and mobbing. With the Phoebe Prince case, it just reminded me how cruel people can be at any age.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Phoebe_Prince

What I really wanted to address is the fact that I believe a large part of the mobbing in schools, work, community ect might also in part happen if people are not aware of, or are not using the informant signals. These informants in some cases, see this as a right to harass anyone who will not signal back at them. On a high school level all you need is a clique of kids in the know, vs those not in the know, and it’s easy to see how this might be applied. Is this being applied, and is this being used in that manner to harass from the schools, work, and community those not in the know, or those not a part of this system? At this stage it’s hard to know for sure, but based on past experience, I now believe that this could be a good possibility. If it is being used in this manner, then this is something that has to be looked into and sooner than later.

People talk about wanting change, but I think the only change they want is the freedom to control others even further, it’s being done to them, so they get a little power and in turn oppress others the same way. If you want others to change, look about you at how this system is working, and how you are being worked by it, and in turn destroying others.

Monkey’s, Elephants, Frogs

How control works.

Monkey’s and Society

This is how society is basically controlled. I have blogged about this before, but I thought that this would be a timely reminder. People talk about how they want change, how they are dissatisfied with governments, but then they control each other worst than any authority figures do. If people really want change and freedom, then they have to understand how this works, it’s the only way that change can and will happen.

Under this informant system, it’s being used as a means of state and personal control. The other citizens (slaves)  get pressure applied, then they in turn pressure the target to conform, at times by participating in the systemic destruction of the targets life, and they hope to eventually break and destroy the target enough to control them, just like the example above. That is how state control works, and that is how it is working. The people at the bottom have to realize this, and want this to change, but most like the bit of power it gives them, that sense of control. They don’t have it in their own lives, so they try to take it from others. It’s really uncool, and things will not change until this happens.

Elephants and societal control

http://www.stumblerz.com/how-a-twig-can-stop-an-elephant/

[quote]In India young elephants are tied to a tree to be taught obedience.  They pull and pull but cannot break free.  The elephant is still not strong enough to pull the tree out, and in time, after many attempts, it becomes to believe that it will not break free.  No matter how large and strong it grows, it believes that it will never pull the tree out.  At this point, an elephant can be tied to a twig and it will not attempt to break free.  It will always believe that the twig is stronger than it.  Do you ever feel like your stuck?  But, inside you, you know there is a better way of life?  And you just don’t know how?  The elephant and the twig is a perfect parallel to the human condition known as “learned helplessness.”  Realistically an elephant and a human have very different traits to consider this a comparison.  But this particular pattern of the elephant is symbolic to how the human can be subjected to the same condition.  Unlike the elephant, a human has his own will; therefore, the cycle can be broken.  As a human, you were given a great power.  Your mind, the mind has endless possibilities.  Unfortunately, instead of living our lives freely, we have succumbed to living in environments run by systems.  Sure it does make some things easier and helps keep some kind of order.  On some part systems help keep things running, which is not a bad thing.  The only problem with a system is that it keeps things running in one direction.  It does not allow much room for change, for that would disrupt the system.  As humans we are always evolving and need room to grow and change.  With these systems we have been subjected to this “learned helplessness” and have become stuck living in the system.  These systems reside in a family unit, a community, in professions, by traditions, and in cultures.  Don’t get me wrong a system provides support to function, but the original purpose gets lost in the upkeep of the system.  In other words, we are the elephants and the systems are the twigs.   We must not forget our true purpose and not be afraid to disrupt the system in order for it to be re-evaluated and adjusted.  Just like a computer, it is always being updated and changed to bring us better service.  Imagine how far you could advance if you were to upgrade the system.  Now, maintain respect to the systems but don’t be afraid to ask for upgrades.[/quote]

Once you get the people to condition themselves, very little control is needed to keep them in line. Thus we walk our selves back to work after breaks, no control, no chains needed, we learn to condition ourselves, breaking free of those conditioning is in part what being free would truly be about.

Frogs boiled alive and society

We watch our rights being eroded everyday. Body scanners, email and internet rights being removed or invaded, the water is boiling but like this helpless frog we do very little about it. We change to go along with the laws, and we are  passive.  Before you know it the water is too warm. This is what society is like in the 21st century.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svpsLZDgFK4

This post is not to be confused with frogs, monkeys and state control.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/mokeys-frogs-state-control/