A sickness that infects every sector of society
The ones of these circles that do get caught, they don’t speak in most cases, or if they do speak, they are not likely to be believed. I mean would you believe this cute little boy grew up to be this sort of paedophile, or this regal family from top to bottom, are full and crawling with them, and everyone in their circles are likely the same thing? I didn’t, until I researched. It’s all true in most cases.
Sickness That Infects the Whole of Show Business
The entertainment industry can be a rough ride for a child, and an industry that seems to have little or no internal governance regarding the regulation of sexual predators within its borders. I’ve been attacked on a few occasions and saved by sheer luck, ended up at serious sex parties with male and female prostitutes, bucket loads of drugs, alcohol The question now is there a cure? Is there a way to ensure that hundreds if not thousands, upon thousands of individuals pay for their crimes towards children, rich and powerful prosecutors, judges, lawyers, doctors, people who covered up for these people. The joke is that there are so many of them sometimes, that if you are investigating them, you might have to arrest most of those assisting with the so called investigation.
In the 19th of January edition of The Sunday Herald, Neil Mackay sensationally reported that senior members of Tony Blair’s government were being investigated for pedophilia and the “enjoyment” of child-sex pornography:
“The Sunday Herald has also had confirmed by a very senior source in British intelligence that at least one high-profile former Labour Cabinet minister is among Operation Ore suspects. The Sunday Herald has been given the politician’s name but, for legal reasons, can not identify the person.
There are still unconfirmed rumours that another senior Labour politician is among the suspects. The intelligence officer said that a ‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur.”
That was back in 2003, what’s changed, not much, maybe the public’s awareness, but not much. The additional problem is that none of this changes, the children grow up to be the same thing, acting out, and worst, and then the next generation in that society, or I dare say the other societies, grow up to continue these disgusting practices they have learnt. They become the same thing.
While British Prime Minister Tony Blair is under criminal suspicion in the “honours-for-cash” scandal that has rocked his Labour government, we have been told that there is an even more explosive scandal that Blair, up to now, has managed to hide behind the draconian British policy of issuing “D-Notices,”
government orders that prohibit the British media from reporting on certain “national security” cases.
In 1999, an international investigation of child pornographers and paedophiles run by Britain’s National Criminal Intelligence Service, code named Operation Ore, resulted in 7,250 suspects being identified in the United Kingdom alone.
Some 1850 people were criminally charged in the case and there were 1451 convictions. Almost 500 people were interviewed “under caution” by police, meaning they were suspects. Some 900 individuals remain under investigation. In early 2003, British police began to close in on some top suspects in the Operation Ore investigation, including senior members of Blair’s government.
Those numbers are very interesting, but when those at the top can pull D notices, or have other notices on files, how does anything get done? There are so many that are guilty that need to be brought to justice. They just keep added little notices to files, this is there sort of person, please do not continue the investigation.
Also how many of these individuals are infecting other underage children with STD’s? After being victimized by these individuals, how many are left with lifetime infections, or infections that will not get fixed, that they will pass on to unsuspecting partners? These are adults in most cases that are feasting on children. They need to be stopped, but most of the public still seem to be unaware.
Icke says – Lord Louis Mountbatten introduced Savile to the Royal family.
Mountbatten was a paedophile. Savile procured children for rich and powerful paedophiles, including the Royals, and made a fortune by doing so. Paedophile rings watch each others backs – the judiciary, politicians, Royalty, police forces, the clergy and so on. If a procurer blabs, they don’t live long.
Savile didn’t grass, as he boasted on video, and survived to the age of 84.
The Savile case is in the news, and when it rains in pours, but I am not sure how many have been following along with this case. There are too many times that someone sees an article like this, questions the validity of David Icke, I don’t fully trust him, they use too many of their sort at time to expose small things, that others were going to expose, not necessarily saying Mr Icke is there kind, but the research I was doing was interesting.
Savile worked with Prince Philip, and later Prince Charles. Mrs Thatcher’s cabinet was awash with paedophiles. Savile was friends with Mrs Thatcher.
Icke explains how the Satanist and pedophile networks make politicians press for laws they otherwise wouldn’t be interested in, using blackmail. They select paedophiles to become politicians for this reason, to get people who easy to blackmail and control.
Blackmail and contro, these people act like they want to be controlled, Royal person X threatened to expose this politicians dirty secret here, so politician a) decided to enable themselves to be blackmailed. Let’s say the secret was a affair. A simple thing, but they go along with the cover up. By the time politician a) is finished being black mailed, they have likely covered up something so horrific, they can no longer get out of it. Also once they get into this, they do additional crimes, such as agreeing to be child molester themselves, or worst. When in the incorrect situation, they continue in the same vain, they mentally do not function the same way the rest of us do. Also when in those situation, they see so many prominent paedophiles, people you would never suspect, many of them feel a little justified going along with it.
Icke also describes how the ‘entities’ he sometimes talks of, desire to tap into the energy of pre-puberty children. Upper echelon pedophiles from the bloodline families, are more powerfully possessed by these entities beyond human sight.
The possessing ‘entity’ is using the pedophile to draw off the child’s life force.There is an insatiable demand for this energy, which creates an insatiable demand for children. This is where the Saviles, the Hamiltons (Dunblane) come in.
They are like vampire, but energy or essence vampires. I can honestly say, this stuff is the actual stuff, I have no true way of how to stop this, because the structure is so corrupted, that if you go after a few it’s a waste, sorry, but it’s a waste, if you arrest them all at once, it could bring down the whole freaking structure, and what to do then? A new structure must then be created.
One that is cognizant of what is happening, and one that is willing to work diligently and honestly to reform these systems. Not every place is like this, but too many places are like this, not everyone thinks like this thank God, and
not everyone is like this.
You need a team of investigators committed, ones that are not easily framed, set up, terrified, harassed, killed off, financially wealthy, then you need the fortitude, and you have to keep the people they send to throw off the investigations away from what you are doing.
The investigations are there, they have been done, but then when they are getting close to making the arrests, they are thawed, by D notices in the U.K., and other situations like the Franklin Cover Up’s in the U.S.
Should they have kept this place opened or closed it? There was an article that the place was going to be closed. Won’t be surprised if there are pictures in the papers tomorrow. Sometimes these places make sense to keep open and sometimes they don’t.
I wonder who is coming and going at such places, anyways some of these threads are interesting at times?
Do places like this add or take away from the fabric of society, and should they be kept open or closed?
Does the government have a back door to the internet? I have posted before about strange happenings, but here is something that should be of interest.
I posted a comment at TMZ using my normal email address, the confirmation email did not arrive. I found it strange. So I created a different email address and posted a comment on a different article.
That email confirmation arrived. So it could just be that something was wrong with my original email right? So to test the theory, I created a second account with a different user name, and posted a bubble (meaningless comment) comment. For the bubble comment and different user name, I immediately received the following email. Portions have been edited, but you get the general gist.
(Please activate your comments by clicking this URL:
The comments below will be added to the post titled )
So I got an email confirmation and password, which would allow me to post comments without any need for more email confirmations. I then went back to post my original comment that had a bit more substance, using the password and email, and it does not post. Remember I now have a password, and email, but my original comment is not posting.
So the question is do those that are doing the monitoring have a secret back door to the Internet that allows such things to happen? I think it could be more simple than that. Is there a way to prevent emails from arriving that a hacker could do? Cause I and many targets have seen emails not arrive, but in this case, my original did not arrive, the second did, and the third did not. I usually have better things to do, but I think I can somewhat prove this, ofcourse in typical fashion, after posting this, watch a billion comment show up on TMZ.
It’s not that far off a question considering that the military created the internet, why would they not have backdoors? Even if this specific situation is not caused by a government backdoor, is it not reasonable to assume that they have one?
If they do not have backdoors, then what can they do?
So to test out the theory further I created a third account, using the same mail company where the second email did arrive and lo and behold the email just like with the first email, same user name did not arrive.
I created a different user for the comment. This shows deliberate interference and I think this should make a rational person wonder, just a little bit if something odd is ongoing.
Now only is the comment being prevented from being posted, but emails are being prevented in this case.
So what happens to the emails? see in the first case, you could just assume that the email did not arrive, but the second email with the another company did, but the third email which was created using the first comment, with the second email company did not arrive.
The only difference with the emails is that one comment had a reference to Gangstalking and the other comment did not. Comment two which was a test comment was just a bubble comment, and it make it through.
I don’t think this is happening at TMZ’s side, cause I have seen this before on too many websites. This might be the closest that I have come to proving this. I believe it’s happening at the local end and the idiots doing the monitoring are responsible. So is there a hack that can do this? If so what? What is the work around?
If they need to block emails that badly, then that’s a good thing. It shows that they are scared of this being exposed, and I think this means we are doing better, than expected. Sure getting illegally blocked is not fun, but this can work in our favor.
If we continue to do what we are doing, then I think we can get this exposed.
Lastly when did google mail start requiring a sms phone confirmation for new emails? I have never seen this before.
I just checked and it typical make the target look crazy and discredit them, the postings are all there.
Except for a couple of things. Because I used the never signed up at TMZ option for my first email, I should have gotten a response in my in box and did not. So I contacted the site saying, hey I did not get my confirmation email. That was at 3:57 and up until I made this post, none of my comment were on that site, except for the bubble comment, which did not appear up until 4:31 and that was because I finally got an email in the second email account I created. Yet when I go back to this site, I can see comments from myself at 3:51 pm, which were my original comments. So how did the original comments post without the required email verification?
Let me recap. I posted a comment at 3:51 or there abouts. It did not post. No email was received. I tried it again, and nothing. I contacted the site at 3:57 and got their auto responder. Shortly after I created a second account, and posted a bubble comment just for the hell of it. That made it through right away after clicking on the confirmation email, plus another email giving me a user name and password. Subsequently I went went back to post and again nothing happened.
Yet now all the comments are showing. This is typical, trying to discredit the target, but I took the screen caps, which I find help a great deal.
My original comments are now showing. Those comments that I never received a confirmation email for, which were not showing up at the time of this posting, but are now fully there.
I also have a screen cap of my bubble comment which did post right away at 4:31 Pm on another article.
So were the comments just not showing from my end? A resonable explanation, but then why could I see the bubble comment and not the rest? Where are the missing emails? Why are all the posted comments now showing, about 6 of them in total, which just looks like spam now, but they were not showing at the time. Keep in mind that other comments were posting and those showed up just fine.
It’s a small thing, but sometimes it’s proving the small things that will help you prove the larger things. I by no means thing this is definitive proof, but it should make you go hum?
This is a day about making make believe look real. A day about giving the situation at hand the look of reality and the spin that you want it to have.
Eg. Many people believe that Sept 11 happened. Where people differ is who was behind it? Did planes really hit and bring down the world trade center buildings and was the official version the real version?
For many who are familiar with documents such as Operation Northwoods it’s reason to question if the government of the United States once again planned and carried out terror on the American citizens.
[quote]Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”.
This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government, namely Cuba.
The plan stated:
The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.
Several other proposals were listed, including the real or simulated actions against various U.S military and civilian targets. Operation Northwoods was part of the U.S. government’s Cuban Project (Operation Mongoose) anti-Castro initiative. It was never officially accepted or executed.[/quote]
Also recently we saw in Spain a building made out of steel that burnt for 20 hours straight but still remained standing. An amazing structure proving the power of steel to withstand heat and melting.
[quote]In February 2005, the 32-storey Windsor Building in the financial district of Madrid, Spain was completely engulfed by flames for 20 consecutive hours. I repeat: 20 consecutive hours. The structure did not collapse. In fact, after the fire was finally extinguished, a huge construction crane was seen perched on the roof of the building as raw testimony to the practical indestructibility of steel as a construction material.[/quote]
We also when 911 happened saw building 7 fall, even though no planes had hit the building and some rightfully question why that happened?
We also saw hole in the pentagon, but many question if a plane did hit, where the wreckage of the plane was?
Also last but not least, if you are a terrorist crashing planes into a building then even if your dental records don’t last, your passports will. Even when steel buildings melt, your passports will survive,
Anyways Sept 11 an ode to faking it, and it proves you can make anything appear how you want it to be, and most will never question the official version.
Who you have slept with.
Now having watched soaps over the years, I have seen a few of these plots. Some really desperate attempts to make it seem like someone had slept with someone when they really had not, or the person had not been willing. Anything from fake pictures, fake video, fake witnesses.
Who could forget Sammie Brady drugging Austin her older sisters boyfriend to make it seem as if he had willingly slept with her when she had not. Yes Sammie turned out to be a case, but she did improve in time. (She improved in her scheming that is, but that’s another story.)
Watching Dorian Lord get a divorce from David. To get a divorce from David Dorian had to enlist her niece Blair Cramer to dress up as her double, and pretend to sleep with Dorian’s husband David, but at the last minute Dorian switched places with Blair and David none the wiser, cheated on his own wife, with his own wife.
A few fake pictures later, and the divorce was finalised. Now these plots are cute in soap operas, well not really, but in real life this is another thing that is often easily faked and never questioned, because people like to believe whatever they are told without question.
I think watching desperate characters pull off things like this in the soaps are cute, I have had opportunity in real life to watch people pull things off like this and it’s never cute. To lie and in some cases create and fake plots almost or more desperate and more harmful than things that I have seen on the soaps.
I think it shows some pretty twisted personalities. People who don’t care about ruining or slandering other people’s reputations just to make themselves feel better, and in today’s world it’s even easier than ever.
I don’t mean that the investigations that targets are under are fake, but what is fake is what the state does to us. They make people think all sorts of things, and they make the lies look good. That’s what faking it is all about, making the lies look good and believable.
Most of us are not crazy, perverts, terrorists, extremists, etc, but that does not matter, it’s continuing to give the perception to the people, that is what matters.
Making them think that if they were not spying on each other the world would suddenly fall apart, creating that illusion, that fake need.
Going to extreme lengths to make targets look like a danger, be it having dozens of informants on their tail, making them look dangerous, etc.
I had no idea until recently the lengths they will go through to manipulate a situation to make a person look crazy or dangerous. This system is truly crazy and desperate, which equals dangerous. The asleep sheeple will believe what they are told in many cases, and it’s scary.
So this post is all about Faking it. The above three things are some of the top things I have come across. Now since I am lucky enough to be free, please feel free to add your comments about other things that people like to fake.
My account which I have had at Canada Kicks Ass has been banned.
After I started writing fact based information about the subject matter of Gang Stalking my posts stopped appearing at the front of the website.
When I asked the admins about this, I got responses that did not answer the question. However it was very apparent that the blog was in that regard being censored. No big, I continued to blog.
I also had someone once try to ban my account one other time at that site, but since no legit reason could be given my account was reinstated several days later.
Anyways last week I did the six part post about male rape. The posts were deleted. So I created a separate post with the links to another blog, explaining that maybe the content was too much for CKA and that if they wanted to read the posts, they should do so at the other blog.
Anyways I wrote to one of the mods asking if the subject matter of male rape had been too much for that forum to handle and here is the response that I received. The posts had been deleted without any explanation.
Yep…way too much.
I did it just before I went to bed. No automatic emails regarding the removal of content.
PS: Note, when content is removed, putting it back up could get you a holiday from here.[/quote]
Last edited by QBC on 2009-08-24, 06:36:57, edited 1 time in total.
So I did not put the content back up. This week since I could not post my post blog posting, I did a sub-post explaining that the content might not work for CKA, and I left a link to my beyond these walls post.
I also posted in the rant and raves section of their website to let them know that I did not agree with the posts being removed. It was a very moderate post. I got a response from one member, and that was that. I went to sleep and work up today with the account being banned.
Could not get access to the account. However the account is linked to
I still had access to that forum, so I quickly logged in and got the email he sent me, because I had a feeling that access would be denied very quickly.
I tried to send the owner of the forums a PM to find out why my account was banned, and suddenly in the middle of that, my access to the second forum was blocked. Now unless someone is monitoring what I am doing in live action how do you explain that? Someone had to know that I logged in and blocked the access. So again more censorship.
I also notice that my posts for August at CKA all of them have been removed. Specifically posts that had nothing to do with this topic. The specific post that has been removed was the Terry Tramaine post.
Eg. My Standard Operating Post had not been touched, and my blogging had continued as normal. I think my banning has more to do with posts like this.
I don’t think I broke any forum rules, the content that was removed was never re-posted, I do believe that the some powers that be, don’t like specific topics getting blogged about or discussed. Canada is suppose to be a very democratic country, but it’s not.
However the point remains that I did have access to the second forum, and shortly after recovering my email, the access was closed, unless my computer activity is being live monitored, then it’s hard to explain it otherwise.
So I sent Trev and email, I don’t necessarily expect a response. Nice enough guy, but I don’t think that he has control over what is happening, but it does not hurt to try.
Warning: mail() [function.mail]: SMTP server response: 501 Syntax error in forward path in D:\Hosted Sites\trevormay.ca\www\wp-content\plugins\easy-contact\econtact.php on line 260
Your email was sent successfully.)
I realise that I might not get an response, but then I am still asking a question.
I post at CKA, my posts are not shown at the front of your forums, fine. Recently I did six post discussing the subject of male rape,the threads were removed.
I did a post to explain that the subject was maybe not a CKA topic of discussion and then went on from there, I asked your admin why the posts were removed and got this response.
Yep…way too much.
I did it just before I went to bed. No automatic emails regarding the removal of content.
PS: Note, when content is removed, putting it back up could get you a holiday from here.
Last edited by QBC on 2009-08-24, 06:36:57, edited 1 time in total.
Then I started a thread to address the issue, I did not post any content, however the account was deleted. My post did not contain any of the content, and was still within forum guidelines.
I feel that your mod was looking for a reason to get the account banned, I realise that CKA for some time now has had some censorship issues ongoing with my blog and I believe your mod has taken the time to use this opportunity unjustly to have my account suspended.
My world won’t end, but I would like to have a legit response. It seems more than any other location, that Canada and Canadian forums don’t want to have this issue discussed, and it makes me wonder why?
This post was really just going to be a short blurb, but the more I researched, the more their was to the story and I thought if I was going to tell the story, then I had better do it right, so where do I begin?
Well originally I thought the story was going to be about Keith de Roux and the fact that he killed Wolfgang Droege, but more importantly, I believe very strongly that Keith de Roux, might have been a Targeted Individual. That’s where my investigation of this story started, but not where it ended, so I will take you through it bit by bit.
As usual, I came across a story that lead to another story, that lead to a death and a killer, but what caught my eye about the killer was his reasons for doing the killings. Stop me if you have heard this one before.
[quote]Friday said the 44-year-old Deroux’s cocaine addiction was fuelling ‘paranoid delusions’ that listening devices and cameras had been placed in his apartment. The drug addict believed someone was sending him coded messages through his computer and, even after moving to a new residence, Deroux feared people were entering his house through an underground tunnel and funnelling “noxious gases” into the residence. The only person with enough resources for this kind of surveillance, Deroux figured, was his friend and cocaine dealer, Wolfgang Droege. … [/quote]
Ofcourse the killer is written off as some drug addicted paranoid whack job, who was just imagining, or making the whole thing up due to his paranoia, but let’s look at the details. He believe he was under surveillance, listening devices, cameras, placed in his apartment. He believed that he was getting coded messages via his computer, and wait for it, even after moving the same things continued to happen. This time he moved to a house, he experiences gassing and home breakin’s or home entry. The only part that is not clear is why he believe that they were using a tunnel of some sort to get in. Could be the drugs, or maybe there was some secret way into his home under the stairs from outside, stranger things have happened, depending on how the home was built.
Now I can’t say that he was a targeted individual for sure, but my instinct tells me that he was. If so we have yet one more target, who killed someone, and the media and society covering it up, not giving any creed to his claims about being under investigation. This happened in Toronto, Canada. Now I sort of thought that was the end of the story and it sort of was, but then I decided to look into the life of Droege, the person that he had killed. Could Droege, have been helping with the investigation that this man believed he was under? Was there reason to suspect or believe that Droege could be or could have been working for the system?
So I started to look into his life. In the course of so doing, I am sure I visited a number of websites that the government does not like, and therefore I am sure I have incured the wrath of the informant force, and the never ending focus of their wrath, and as much as I would like to care, I can’t. I am here to learn, if my learning and seeking to understand my world better, and those around me does not fit in with the status quo, too bad. If the snitches watching and monitoring my computer are going to use this stuff to accuse me of being what I am not, then too bad, I am not responsible for the stupidity of others.
Now on to the main story. I started with Droege’s wikipedia page. That was an interesting story. Did you know the he and several others once tried to take over the tiny Island of Dominica?
In 1981, Droege helped organize a failed attempt, codenamed “Operation Red Dog”, to invade the Caribbean nation of Dominica and overthrow its government and restore deposed Prime Minister Patrick John to power. According to testimony presented at the trial of Droege and his nine co-conspirators, in exchange for restoring John to power, Droege would have been permitted to use the island as the centre of a drug-refinement and trafficking operation.
The attempted coup went awry after a CFTR radio reporter who had been approached about an “exclusive story” decided to contact the police. Droege was sentenced to a three-year prison sentence for his mercenary activities. [/quote]
What was interesting about this plot for me was not that him and several others tried to take over Dominica, it was what I came away with. After reading the story, it just seemed that there was one person leading the operation more than the others.
[quote]The plan was to charter a boat to Dominica and rendezvous via rubber boats with John and his makeshift army. The genesis of the idea came from long-time Klan member Mike Purdue, who was introduced in 1979 to Droege through David Duke. That summer, Purdue outlined his plan to overthrow Grenada and to set up several lucrative businesses. After their meeting, it was established that Droege would locate funds and resources. Duke initially involved Don Andrews, but after Purdue changed the target island to Dominica, Andrews withdrew. Klansmen Arnie Polli and Roger Dermee were paid US$3,000 to visit Dominica to obtain preliminary reconnaissance. Canadian neo-Nazi Martin K. Weiche was allegedly a financial backer of the plot along with James White of Houston and L. E. Matthews of Jackson, Mississippi.
In February 1981, the captain and crew Duke had arranged for backed out. Purdue then approached a local boat captain and Vietnam War veteran, Michael S. Howell. Purdue said the Central Intelligence Agency needed his boat for a covert operation. Howell then contacted the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). On April 25, John was arrested in Dominica. When Purdue learned of the arrest and that their plans were no longer secret, he insisted that the mission should continue.
On April 27, the group, including three ATF agents, met at the predetermined location, loaded the van and proceeded to the marina. A Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) team was waiting for them at the marina.[/quote]
What was interesting for me was the lack of information on Mike Perdue. The other thing that was interesting was the apparent tale he told about secretly being CIA on a covert mission. I remember that the FBI back in the 60′s had over 25% concentration in the KKK, and that they often rose to leadership positions. I don’t know what their concentration would be in this day and age.
I kept searching and I found this article, which covered a couple of points that I was wondering about.
The article covers two points that I was interested in. One that I will cover directly. A book came out a couple of years ago called Bayou of pigs, and it’s a name play on the bay of pigs fiasco, and it talks all about the plan to take over the island of Dominica, but what is intersting about this article is that it also wonders about Perdue.
[quote] They went to a motel and Perdue paid for a room. Perdue introduced himself as a former sergeant in the Marine Corps and a Vietnam vet. He listed off his medals. And then he started the mercenary sales pitch: “He told me that the north end of the island was literally infested with communism,” Anderson says. “He left me with the impression that [Prime Minister Eugenia] Charles’ government was kind of leaning pro-communist.” There was going to be a coup, Perdue said, and he was hiring advisors. There would be minor resistance, he warned.
“I would like to have a bloodless coup,” Perdue told him, but, “who is to know what will happen in a situation like this?”
Although Perdue never said outright that it was a CIA-backed operation, he dropped hints. He mentioned his military experience and his “friends” in the State Department. “He planted in me in a roundabout way the seed of suspicion,” Anderson says, “where I suspicioned possibly that the CIA might be involved in this.” Perdue chose his words carefully. He said the U.S. Navy wanted to build a submarine base on the island. He said the CIA would be “interested” in what they were doing. Anderson realized that could mean any number of things, but one interpretation was that the CIA was somehow involved, which meant that this was a U.S. government sanctioned coup d’état. [/quote]
Was the CIA really involved in a coup d’etat, that failed?
[quote] “You’ll get $3,000 for going in,” Mike said. “About a month or so afterwards, you’ll get your $15,000 for staying with me.”
If Anderson agreed to stay on for the full five years as a First Sergeant in the Dominica Defense Force, he would also get one-sixth of Nortic Enterprises, the company that was going to develop the island’s economy.
“I’ve got a five-year contract,” Perdue said. “We’ll be in an advisory position. This is their country, so we respect their laws.”
Anderson said he was interested, so they went over the photocopied maps and the hand-drawn assault diagram of the police station. Perdue said he wanted Anderson to be his wingman in Red Dog One, one of the three mercenary teams that were going to storm the island. Together, the two of them would capture the charge office at police headquarters.
“If you’re in it for the money, the adventure, and to fight communism, to prevent expansion of communism in the Caribbean,” Perdue told him, “you’re in.”
Anderson wasn’t an ideologue. He had nothing to do with the Ku Klux Klan or anything like it. For him, this was a chance to make money. He thought Perdue was businesslike; he seemed like he knew what he was doing, like he had done this before.[/quote]
Just a few year earlier a similar popular uprising had been set up in the Dominican Republic.
[quote]Droege and Purdue returned to Las Vegas in January 1981 to finalize the plans with their new business associates. At the meeting, it was decided that Droege would remain in Nevada while Purdue would travel to Dominica to get Patrick John to sign a contract that secured the participation of the military in the coup as well as assurances that all natural resources and development projects on the island would be handed over to the mercenaries and the investors.
It’s safe to say that the U.S. government definitely had an interest in that part of the world, and controlling the politics that happened there. Was the true objective of Operation Red Dog another such similar plot, disguised as something else? Was it really a covert CIA operation as stated? One can only wonder.
After some mishaps Droege, would go to jail, joined another right wing group and eventually quit the right wing group to form his own white/nationalist or as some call it white supremacist group the Heritage Front.
The Heritage Front would become Canada’s largest group of it’s kind.
[quote]The Heritage Front was a Canadian neo-Nazi white supremacist organization founded in 1989 and disbanded around 2005. The group claimed that its members were “ordinary Canadian men and women who are dedicated to the European values and traditions upon which this nation was originally founded.” [/quote]
This group was established by Droege, Gerry Lincoln, and Grant Bristow.
This is where the story gets interesting, because as some of you know the punch line is that Grant Bristow was a CSIS informant right from the start, he deliberately made friends with Droege, and helped to establish the Heritage front. I wonder who picked the name? Front can stand for home front, but it can also stand for a front, something that is not what it seems.
Either way, just like with the left wing groups that I researched, Black Panthers, Malcolm X, etc, the FBI, or in this case the same thing, CSIS Canada’s version, seem to almost always be involved right from the start, or were able to quickly infiltrate.
When the story broke years later that Bristow was an informant many were outraged, he had helped commit a lot of outrageous actions.
[quote]Grant Bristow, working on behalf of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), infiltrated the group and became one of its leaders. According to the CSIS and Bristow, their role was to gather intelligence on the far right and try to suppress its violent activity. Bristow’s role in the group was exposed in 1994 by the Toronto Sun, and became the subject of an inquiry by the Security Intelligence Review Committee, which published a report on the matter in that same year.[/quote]
What’s interesting about Grant is that he did an interview several years later about his involvement with the Heritage Front, he tried to paint himself as a hero. When I was reading the article I tried to see his point of view, here he is being a double agent, and according to him trying to prevent violence, well he was not a snitch trying to keep himself out of jail granted, but after reading over the article, I just could not see him as the hero that he tried to portray himself as.
[quote]August 12, 1994, the new, sedate life he had built in a bland Toronto suburb for himself, his wife, and son began to unravel. For six years, Bristow had inhabited the perilous universe of white supremacists as a mole for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (csis).
Months earlier, Bristow had gladly walked away from racists and espionage, his cover still safely intact. [/quote]
The problem with this article is that, I don’t think that his cover was going to be intact for that much longer, and I think that is why he primarily walked away.
Heritage front had a member called Elisse Hategan and she wanted out, she started to take notes on the organization and when Grant found out, he sought permission from Droege to break into her home, and he also threatened her with a white van ride, implying (“beating and death threat”)
[quote]1993, July 1 – Heritage Front member Elisse Hategan tries to quit the phone harassment campaign. Secretly, Hategan contacts Canadian Centre on Racism and Prejudice and begins taking notes on the Heritage Front. Bristow learns of notes and tries to get Droege to authorize a break-in at Hategan house to retrieve notes. Bristow threatens her with a “white van ride” (beating and death threat implied). [Link to this item][/quote]
1994, March – End of Bristow’s assignment, CSIS’s Operation Governor. [Link to this item]
–Source: Wikipedia entry, “Grant Bristow”
1994, March – Elisse Hagen testifies against Wolfgang Droege, Gary Shipper and Ken Barker. Her testifying at this hearing makes it apparent to few that Bristow is probably a CSIS mole. “Now, was Mr. Bristow with CSIS at that time? I don’t think so. However, it was clear that someone, somewhere in the police apparatus, was protecting Mr. Bristow. I was sure of that, and when we met him in March, when Ms Hategan testified, it was obvious.” [Link to this item]
–Source: Martin Thériault, director, Canadian Centre on Racism and Prejudice, Testimony before parliamentary committee, June 13, 1995
His cover was not safe, in fact I would guess he had a pretty good idea that his cover was not going to be safe for long, and I think that is the real reason that he got out. I really tried to believe that he was the hero, going undercover to save the day, protect others from violence, but in typical FBI/CSIS fashion, it looks like he might have at times inspired some of the very violence that he pretended that he was trying to prevent. Just like when the FBI informant shot Viola Liuzzo.
[quote]1994, March – Publication of Web of Hate. Chapter 8 on the Heritage Front is longest in the book, 52 pages. Droege is covered in depth. Gerry Lincoln is mentioned in the book five times. Grant Bristow’s name does not appear once, anywhere in the book, even though he is a founding member of the Heritage Front and a nearly 2,000 word news story (by Bill Dunphy), with photo, identifying Bristow as a Front member appeared in the Toronto Sun in 1992, As the SIRC report will reveal Kinsella was aware of the Sun article and the name of Grant Bristow and even attempted to lay a police complaint against him. The Sean Maguire incident is not mentioned in the book (in which an Aryan Nations enforcer caught with Bristow in 1991 with guns) even though it was reported in the press. The ’92 and ’93 Zentner fire bombings blamed on Nazis are not mentioned, though they were reported in the press. In the notes to Chapter 8 on the Heritage Front, Kinsella writes, he completed his research in October, 1993, so these events occurred well before the research for Web of Hate was completed. Later in August after Bristow is exposed, Kinsella will say he made a police complaint about Bristow for posing as an Ottawa Citizen reporter helping Kinsella to Bernie Farber, a May 7, 1993 incident described in the Dec. 9, 1994 SIRC report. So, a known member of the Heritage Front seeks information from a well-known Jewish organization and the incident is not mentioned in the book? Also, Kinsella claims in Chapter 8 that the Heritage Front has “2,000 in all” members and supporters, but provides no documentation for this. [Link to this item]
–Source: Quill & Quire. Toronto: Mar 1994. Vol. 60, Iss. 3; pg. 28
–Source: Web of Hate, first edition, 1994, HarperCollins[/quote]
It’s amazing what was left out of the book, and that Grant Bristrow was left out of the book, and his actions go unmentioned. When I tried to research more on Predue, I also found information to be very unavailable, where all the other important players I could find information on, Maybe just one of those bad coincidents.
Back to Droege, at some point the going to jail, betrayl by a guy he thought was the best friend that he had ever had seems to have gotten to him, he lost his job and could not find normal means to support himself. What’s interesting about Droege is the fact that Bristrow describes him as the real deal, someone who was not just all talk, but someone who was really committed to his cause. I find that no matter which side, the left or the right, the ones who are really for their cause, are the ones that often suffer the most, the ones that actually care. Clearly I don’t share Droege’s views, or values, but in researching this, it’s one of the things that I find that he has in common with others who fought for a cause and really believed in it.
So back to the story, is it possible that Droege was helping to keep his friend Keith under surveillance visa a vie Gang Stalking?
[quote]Droege’s involvement in a failed attempt to overthrow the government of Dominica in the Caribbean — the plan being to set up a white supremacist base there — led to a three-year prison sentence.
While others involved lost their stomach for far right activism after that failed plot, Droege “kept at it,” Kinsella said. “They kept throwing him in jail, and he’d come out more committed than he was before.”
Droege was arrested in Alabama in 1985 on cocaine possession and weapons charges. He was convicted and sentenced to 13 years, returning to Canada in April 1989.
He started organizing the Heritage Front in October 1989. The group was a continental network of neo-Nazis.
Among the tactics they used to spread their message were racist rock concerts and a telephone hotline that offered racist phone messages.
Droege was an associate of Holocaust-denier Ernst Zundel, who was recently deported from Canada.
After the mid-1990s and the emergence of the Internet as a primary communications and organizing tool for hate groups, Droege became less active and focused more on drug trafficking.[/quote]
He certainly lead a colorful life, and did spend a great deal of time in jail, and was into drugs.
[quote] Even though it was mid-afternoon, Wolfgang wore nothing but a T-shirt and underwear. He had no use for clothes. All he did these days was sell drugs out of his apartment, and the job had no dress code. His clients were desperate. They didn’t care if he wore pants.
The neighbors suspected he was up to no good. Visitors would come and go at all hours. His apartment on the second floor of 2 North Drive was a regular drive-thru but the Toronto police drug squad apparently knew nothing about it. Although Wolfgang was one of those cryptically referred to as “known to police,” and his FBI file warned he “should be considered armed and dangerous when not in custody,” it had been years since his last run-in with the law.
Well it is kinda weird that with all that going on, and his being known to the police that he was left to sell drugs out of his apartment. There are several sources across the net that agree that he was most likely at this stage in his life working with, and co-operating with the police.
If that is the case, then he could well have been assisting with the surveillance of his good friend Keith. If Keith is infact a Targeted Individual then Wolfgang Droege, is just one more death that you can attribute to the system and these great investigations, that drive people to the edge.
What I find interesting is that if you are under investigation the informants try to make up everything under the sun about you, you are crazy, racist, drug dealer, user, pedophile, homophobe, etc. When you are one of their informants, they let anything go, the truth is that they don’t care if you are a drug dealer, user, seller, pedophile, racist, crazy, homophobe, etc. It’s not about creating a better society it’s about creating a controlled society.
The informants are the same, they don’t care about justice, honor, decency, they just go along with whatever they are told. they don’t care that their members rape targets, like how Ramonz Lopez was gang raped in her home, they don’t care that they drive people to commit suicide, or commit murders designed to look like suicides, Jeremy Blake, Teresa Duncan, they don’t care about the car crashes that they get targets into that take their lives, they have no compunction about poisoning our food, or messing with a child’s diabetic medication, they don’t care if they hit us with their cars, ruin our lives systemically etc. See as long as they are controlling things that’s all they care about. That’s why you often find out that many of these terrorist plots, organizations, have some informant on the inside, conducting things and leading things in the direction it should go. What I also found interesting is if one of these so called hate groups were doing the same things that these informants do to Targeted Individuals, society would be outraged.
If we had an extremist organization targeting specific groups within society and driving people to commit suicide, setting them up and baited for jail, placing them in mental hospitals, killing them, black listing them, or driving them to commit acts of violence we would be outraged, we would be in the streets screaming for these evil doers to be removed from our mists, we would say to ourselves what good people we are, and that this sort of element does not belong in society. Yet there is the irony, the very same things these so called good people would be in society screaming about, and crying about with their so called outrage, are the exact things and worst that they are letting happen to us, day in and day out, and many targets are snapping, and killing others, themselves, going to jail under false pretext, or mental hospitals, and society just sits back fully complacent and in agreement with what is happening. By protecting this system you are protecting the bad elements, real pedophiles that are now in high places in your governments trying to have sex with 14 and 15 year old boys, while dressed in panda costumes, and other such fun things.
Society has truly become twisted, corrupt and immoral, and the side that thinks they are doing good, are the most corrupt of all, the system they protects destroys innocent lives, and it’s corrupted, yet these so called good citizen protect, cherish and nurture this system, while pointing their fingers at others to let us know who the bad guys are, who to hate.
I have examined this, and hate that you can see and that you can identify you can deal with, but hate that masks itself under righteousness, or societal buzzwords should you go against the grain are more dangerous then that hate that is in front of your eyes.
The year Droege died was a tough year for Toronto, it became infamously known as what they would call the year of the gun, on the surface a weird time period where people just started killing each other, but below the surface when you examined it closer, you saw that several of the cases were linked back to this system, this cruel, cold corrupt system, and when you look at it closer, this is what play a very nice role in the year of the gun, and a lot of what goes on in society. When you examine the strings and see where they lead it does not paint a pretty picture, yet this is what people go along with, believe in, are bonded with, and have sworn their allegiance to.
Pretty frightening picture when you look at it in that regards. http://www.torontopedia.ca/Summer_of_The_Gun
Anyways Keith got 10 years, but will be out before then.
On Friday, June 15 Keith de Roux a Toronto drug addict pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the murder of Heritage Front founder Wolfgang Droege, on April 13, 2005. He received a 10 year sentence, on top of the 14 months already spent in prison. He may well be out in another three years and four months on mandatory supervision – a pretty skimpy penalty for murder.[/quote]
Yes considering that he was likely correct about being under surveillance, and that could even have helped contribute to his downward spiral that lead to him committing the murder in the first place, but why include that little detail in the mix?
What’s Behind Internet Conspiracy Empires? Apparently the truth. From the comments being posting on the article, it’s apparently the average person being sick and tired of the mainstream media feeding them the same information day in and day out that does not explain or answer some of the questions that they are seeking answers to. They are therefore seeking out alternative points of view. You know thinking outside of the box, asking questions and trying to find answers.
I won’t spend too much time on this article, the comments that were posted were fully vindicating. They were bright, intelligent, and they really were highly expressive. I was very impressed by the majority of commentators in that thread.
I was really surprised by the level of discontent with 9/11 truth. That issue is not going away. It’s worst now than it was before. Many of the comments were in regards to this issue. Many of the comments were also about the fact that many people no longer truth corporate controlled media and are looking for other alternatives. Other comments were rightfully concerned with Internet censorship, some felt that this might be a first step towards trying to target such websites, and labelling people as mentally ill for having different points of view.
It was the intelligence of the posters that really impressed me, they were really bright and articulate, again I was highly impressed by the majority of them. People who are still willing to ask questions, and go out and seek other answers for themselves. These are the types of people who find my website, people that have not been satisfied with the mainstream explanations of what is happening and they are independent enough in many cases to be going out and looking for additional answers about what is happening to them.
As far as terming Gang Stalking World as a conspiracy website? I agree that what is happening to us is a conspiracy, but can we prove some of the targeting?
On the site you have documents that show that average normal everyday citizens can and do get followed around in the manner described. I have been able to show that for covert and overt surveillance, police do employ foot patrols. They do use signaling while on foot patrol. I have been able to show that Informants are being hired by the state, that we have become a surveillance culture, and that targeting the way in which we describe is possible.
The information on the website, utilizes information that any individual can go and access from various sources. Eg. Many recent documents on the website link to documents form the A.C.L.U. The documents show that average people will be having information recorded and placed into secret databases which the accused can not access. The information shows that 800,000 Terrorism Liaison Officers, will be in every town, state, city. They say that we are very close to becoming an Orwellian society. Is the A.C.L.U. a conspiracy website for posting this?
If someone goes to their website, or reads one of the various articles available on the Internet about surveillance and average people being monitored in the described manner, are these websites conspiracy sites? Should these websites worry that the information that they are putting out might cause someone to become paranoid?
Again if someone goes to a different website and reads about Workplace Mobbing, Cointelpro, Red Squads, The East German Stasi, etc should those websites be concerned that they might be influencing paranoid delusions? At the end of the day, those websites and mine are providing information, it is up to the individual to decide if the information is relevant and then go from there. The information on the Gang Stalking World website, is a collaboration of information that is readily available at many points of port around the Internet.
The article is an ok read, but the comments were the really interesting and relevant focus. It really showed that people have many concerns that are not being met or discussed by the mainstream media, the primary and reoccurring being 9/11 truth.
- Above top secret
- Abu Ghraib
- Active denial
- Active Denial Weapons
- as the world turns
- Asain Male
- Asian Female
- Astral Plane
- Background records checks
- bad luck
- Black female
- Black Females
- Black Male
- black women
- Brain reading device
- Britney Spears
- brown coats
- Buffy The Vampire Slayer
- changing vibrations
- Citizen Informants
- Civilian Spies
- Community harassment
- community mobbing
- community policing
- concentration camps
- constitutional change
- Controlled society
- Covert investigations
- Cultural diversity and multiculturalism
- david icke
- devinci code
- domestic spying
- East Germany
- electromagnetic frequency
- Electronic harassment
- Emotional Vampires
- False Prophets
- files updated
- Gang Stalking
- government corruption
- GPS tracking
- Guantanamo Bay
- Health and Safety
- Heath Ledger
- High technology
- Honey Trap
- Indigo Ribbon
- Intimate Infiltarations
- Jeremy Blake
- Joan of Ark
- John Lennon
- Kilmeer Gill
- Lord Of The Rings
- Marian Fisher
- Mark M Rich
- Markus Wolf
- Martin Luther King Jr
- Meat production
- mental concentration camps
- metropolitan police
- militarized police force
- Mind Control
- Mind Reading
- Minority women
- Naomi Ebersole
- National Security Letters
- Neurolinguistic programing
- New World Order
- one handed signals
- Online Stalking
- Passive Aggressive Manipulative
- Personal Identifiers
- Police Abuse
- Police Corruption
- Police State
- Production Company
- psychological harassment
- Quantum Physics
- Record keeping
- records updated
- Red Squads
- Robot Sentient Project
- Rosa Parks
- School Shooting
- sexual harassment
- sign language
- Skin Heads
- Social Control
- Spy cameras
- spy satellites
- State target
- Stop snitching
- Targeted Individual
- The Matrix
- Theresa Duncan
- Third wave
- Thought Police
- Threat Assessment Teams
- time travel
- twilight zone
- violent persons registry
- Voice to skull
- walls of jericho
- whistle blower
- white female
- White Male
- workplace mobbing
- Young and the restless
- zero tollerance