Now as a Targeted Individual I learnt early and I learnt fast not to have private conversations out in public. I learnt not to share things with others.
In fact the years before I found out about Gang Stalking, most of my suspicions I kept to myself and shared with no one. I normally do not confide things in people, my confessor is God and that is usually it. I might share the odd tidbit, or if it’s something important that I feel another has the right to know, I might break protocol and that is about it.
Once I did find out about Gang Stalking, and realized that the phone was how people were hearing my conversations, along with things said in the home, both stopped, so a lot of the street theater stuff stopped.
Anything else that would be discovered would almost have to take a mind reader or another with similar capacity to learn any of my secrets. So it got me thinking, do such people exist? Is such a capacity a reality?
Even since I came online several years ago, like 4-5 years now, other Targeted Individuals have been complaining about mind reading, and government mind reading technology. Now at first you don’t know what to think, is it total bogus garbage, or is there some truth to it? I kept an open mind, cause I kind of was ready to put it in the garbage pile, mind reading, who believes that nonsense? I am glad I kept an open mind.
In time I have come to believe that there could and is technology out there that is capable of such things, that will soon be introduced to the general population, but that is not what this article is about. This article is not about technology that can do such, this article is about others.
Some targets have expressed concerns that mind reading technology, or individuals with psi abilities are being used to interpret their thoughts. Proving that such technology was even available has almost been impossible until now.
Laws that prohibit this type of intrusive activity have not caught up with the surveillance society that many live in. I think this will be something law makers might wish to be aware of, and start working on laws prohibiting this type of intrusion. Human rights lawyers might also want to hone up on these technologies.
The link above also covers the US governments remote viewing program. This was a program where the participants not only saw remote places, visited them remotely, went inside remotely and poked around, but the claim is that some in the program, could go forwards, and backwards in time. Remember these are people who worked for a US government program making this claim, not just a bunch of so called people on the internet.
What if in addition to remote viewers others existed of a similar nature?
What I believe is that all individuals are born with these extra abilities. I believe that they never develop in most people, in others they are highly developed, others learn to access and havest these talents, some gain access accidentally, or at specific times such as a crisis or stressful event.
No available wiki information, so I thought I would put together my own assessment.
Mind Readers- This would be litterally having the ability to read minds. You could read everything the person was thinking, and some would have the capacity to see everything that a person was thinking. Now there is technology that is starting to do this, see dreams, read thoughts etc, but what if there are people capable of doing this? No secret would be safe, no thought would be private, this would be the ultimate invasion of privacy, the ultimate violation. Prayers to God would not even be private.
I think this would be a dangerous talent to have. I think it would be classified as mind rape, and if the government ever had access to it, or other unscrupulous, or even just stupid individuals, in the wrong hands this talent could prove problematic for many.
On the other hand, they could try to find out if a person was lying at a court case, they could see if workers had homocidal tendencies within the workplace. If someone really did rape that person, if they really did commit murder, or were thinking of it.
The problem with a mind reader is that too often people think out thoughts, but never act on them, there is often no follow through, but if people’s thoughts start to be taken litterally, think how dangerous that could be?
The mind is meant to be that, a place of release, things that can not be done in this realm, can be done in the realm of the mind, or should be able to be done in the realm of the mind, but what if our society get’s to the stage where people are no longer comfortable with their own thoughts due to these individuals? Then everyone has to think nice thoughts, think nice thoughts, to appease those in power, cause your very thoughts could be used to convict you.
Would thinking about having an affair with that secretary at work be enough in future to convict someone in divorce court? I hope not, thinking is not always doing, in fact thinking is often not doing. We dream, run through a thousand thoughts in our minds, even ones that we might not be readily aware of, and the mind is meant to be just that, a place of thought, formulation, etc.
What if you thought someone was stealing from you, cheating on you, abusing your children, about to commit a murder? What if a mindreader was privy to those thoughts and acted on that information? Then your very thoughts could be used to convict others, thoughts that you would maybe never share with the world, would be come public content, public knowledge, and they could be used to ruin the life of someone else.
Eg. The Edgar Steel case, now he is accused of trying to murder his wife, I am personally giving him the benifit of the doubt, and his wife has come out in support of him, but when this first happened, what if someone could read her thoughts? What if someone was could access every doubt she might have had? Every concern that he could really be guilty before she made up her mind to support him? What if they acted on those thoughts, and used that against him?
Those are the kind of senarios you could be looking at in the future. Every thought, fear, hope, desire, want, need, an open book, and at the mercy of the scrupulous and unscrupulous alike, at the mercy of the wise and unwise and downright stupid. For those who do not have an understanding or proper understanding of a technology, or misuse it, are a great potential danger to society, and laws might well have to be put in place sooner than later to prevent such abuses.
For the targets out there who have complained about this, and believe that it is happening to them, the possibility is real that some could well be the testing ground for such future technology. If they are willing to set up surveillance and watch us in our homes, in the very beds that we sleep in, then why would they not be willing to watch us in our minds. They have no decency, very little humanity, and if they gain access to the capacity, there is little question that they would abuse such technology, be it mechnical or natual ability.
Telepathy (from the Greek τηλε, tele meaning “distant” and πάθη, pathe meaning “affliction, experience”), is the ostensible transfer of information on thoughts or feelings between individuals by means other than the five senses
This means two people, or even one person, has the ability to transfer not only thoughts but feelings. This would allow you to silently hear between two people. Way better than a walkie talkie. In some cases it would not only allow you to hear, if you were really close, it might allow you to feel what was going on with the other person.
Some mother or even fathers report having this with their children, and ofcourse some people in close relationships such as romanic, or tight family connections have reported this ability.
I also like the thought of this ability, because it would be a type of willing communication between two people, vs something invasive like mind reading. Of course if only one is a telepath then you have just one walkie talkie working and that could get very frustrating.
Empathy-[Empathy is the capacity to recognize or understand another's state of mind or emotion. It is often characterized as the ability to "put oneself into another's shoes", or to in some way experience the outlook or emotions of another being within oneself.]
Everyone totally remembers Deanna Troi from Star Trek The Next Generation, in addition to being really pretty she was the ships councillor, and had the ability to feel what others around her were thinking. To get a gage of their intentions via their emotions. A type of sensing ability.
Where mind reading would be considered reading the mind, I consider this sort of reading the heart or emotions. I like this ability and don’t see it as intrusive as mind reading, emotions are often external, and some in society are just good at reading them. I think empathetic people pic up on what is on the outside, vs what is on the inside, so it’s not as violating as say mind reading.
Remote Viewing-[Remote Viewing (RV) refers to the attempt to gather information about a distant or unseen target using paranormal means or extra-sensory perception. Typically a remote viewer is expected to give information about an object that is hidden from physical view and separated at some distance.]
I describes this at the start of the article, but let me recap. They reported in the video that they had been able to not only see places remotely, but visit them, look into them, and poke around. They reported that they were able to go backwards and forewards in time.
[quote]If the remote viewer gets messages of a site from a person who is at the site looking around, then it would be telepathy. If the remote viewer gets messages of a site by “perceiving” the site psychically, then it would be clairvoyance. (If the viewer gets impressions of the site from the future, then it would be precognition. If he gets impressions from someone who viewed the site in the past, then it is retrocognition. If he gets messages from the akashic record or the 11th dimension, or directly from God, then another explanation is needed.)[/quote]
[quote]A psychic (pronounced /ˈsaɪkɨk/; from the Greek ψυχικός psychikos—”of the soul, mental”, also called sensitive) is a person who professes an ability to perceive information hidden from the normal senses through extrasensory perception(ESP), or is said by others to have such abilities. It is also used to describe theatrical performers who use techniques such as prestidigitation, cold reading, and hot reading to produce the appearance of such abilities. It can also denote an ability of the mind to influence the world physically and to the telekinetic powers professed by those such as Uri Geller.[/quote]
Covers a wide array of abilities and I think this is the word or the concept that most average people are aware of. So we have all heard of the cops using them for kidnapping cases, to locate dead bodies, to know if someone is dead or alive.
Some claim to be able to see into the future, some claim to be able to talk to those who have crossed over to the other side. I believe that people with these abilities do exist, or why would the police keep using them?
I also think it’s possible to communicate with those that have crossed over, remember it’s all just different frequencies and if someone can tap that frequency, they could well see, hear, those on the other side.
[quote]The term clairvoyance (from 17th century French with clair meaning “clear” and voyance meaning “vision”) is used to refer to the ability to gain information about an object, person, location or physical event through means other than the known human senses, a form of extra-sensory perception. A person said to have the ability of clairvoyance is referred to as a clairvoyant (“one who sees clearly”).[/quote]
[quote]Other related terms
The words “clairvoyance” and “psychic” are often used to refer to many different kinds of paranormal sensory experiences, but there are more specific names:
 Clairsentience (feeling/touching)
In the field of parapsychology, clairsentience is a form of extra-sensory perception wherein a person acquires psychic knowledge primarily by means of feeling. The word is from the French clair, “clear,” + sentience, “feeling,” and is ultimately derived from the Latin clarus, “clear,” + sentiens, derived from sentire, “to feel”.
In addition to parapsychology, the term also plays a role in some religions. For example: clairsentience is one of the six human special functions mentioned or recorded in Buddhism. It is an ability that can be obtained at advanced meditation level. Generally the term refers to a person who can feel the vibration of other people. There are many different degrees of clairsentience ranging from the perception of diseases of other people to the thoughts or emotions of other people. The ability differs from third eye in that this kind of ability cannot have a vivid picture in the mind. Instead, a very vivid feeling can form.
Psychometry is related to clairsentience. The word stems from psyche and metric, which means “soul-measuring”.
 Clairaudience (hearing/listening)
In the field of parapsychology, clairaudience [from late 17th century French clair (clear) & audience (hearing)] is a form of extra-sensory perception wherein a person acquires information by paranormal auditory means. It is often considered to be a form of clairvoyance. Clairaudience is essentially the ability to hear in a paranormal manner, as opposed to paranormal seeing (clairvoyance) and feeling (clairsentience). Clairaudient people have psi-mediated hearing. Clairaudience may refer not to actual perception of sound, but may instead indicate impressions of the “inner mental ear” similar to the way many people think words without having auditory impressions. But it may also refer to actual perception of sounds such as voices, tones, or noises which are not apparent to other humans or to recording equipment. For instance, a clairaudient person might claim to hear the voices or thoughts of the spirits of persons who are deceased. Clairaudience may be positively distinguished from the voices heard by the mentally ill when it reveals information unavailable to the clairaudient person by normal means (including cold reading or other magic tricks), and thus may be termed “psychic” or paranormal.
 Clairalience (smelling)
Also known as Clairescence. In the field of parapsychology, clairalience [presumably from late 17th century French clair (clear) & alience (smelling)] is a form of extra-sensory perception wherein a person acquires psychic knowledge primarily by means of smelling.
 Claircognizance (knowing)
In the field of parapsychology, claircognizance [presumably from late 17th century French clair (clear) & cognizance (< ME cognisaunce < OFr conoissance, knowledge)] is a form of extra-sensory perception wherein a person acquires psychic knowledge primarily by means of intrinsic knowledge. It is the ability to know something without a physical explanation why you know it, like the concept of mediums.
 Clairgustance (tasting)
In the field of parapsychology, clairgustance is defined as a form of extra-sensory perception that allegedly allows one to taste a substance without putting anything in one’s mouth. It is claimed that those who possess this ability are able to perceive the essence of a substance from the spiritual or ethereal realms through taste. [/quote]
Isn’t wikipedia great? Except for when they remove the Gang Stalking pages.
Anyways not to pull you into the world of the weird, but one more.
Above you have people who are able to gather a wealth of information outside of the five senses, that’s great. Some believe this stuff others don’t, I personally don’t care what people think, or believe, just that they have a basic understanding of this stuff.
Also people have to understand that people have different levels of abilities. In the remote viewing excercises, some could only draw images, some could actually astral travel, other claimed to be able to go backwards and forwards in time. Again this is coming from a US government program.
So different levels of abilties means that you might not always be able to see into the future if you are psychic, some mind readers would only be able to read minds up close, they could not do it at large distances, or only sparadically. Some people would be able to feel at long ranges, others only up close. Some would be able to hear over great distances, some would only be able to do it sparadically, not all the time. Hopefully you get the idea.
So if people can precieve things at a distance, can others influence things at a distance, or people?
I am going to create a new category called influencers. I am sure there is a name for them, but I would have to watch a lot of X-MEN cartoons to find out, and I just don’t have the time right now.
These are people who could get people to have thoughts, feelings, etc that were not there own. Now I have expressed before that there is technology that they use on targets to achieve this on a slight level.
The 1/2 Hz sensory resonance affects the autonomic nervous system and may cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near 1/2 Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation. For these effects to occur, the acoustic intensity must lie in a certain deeply subliminal range.
Above is the mechanical way of doing things, but you could also have those with the natural ability to do things. There are those who could walk into a room, and cause it to become all peaceful and quite, they just carry a snow white quality about them. They make everyone around them calm and happy. The same with those who such energy from those around them. We refer to those as emotional vampires, lot’s of books written about this type. They suck energy from those around them, and Targeted Individuals complain about this type a lot.
But what about others, people who can not just read minds, but influence minds? Eg. Someone could send thoughts of murder, mass homicide, suicide, pedophelia, theft, etc. They would have the ability to influence a persons mind, and the outcome of their actions. The perons would have little to know idea that it was not their own thoughts, but manipulated thoughts, feelings, or emotions. I think this would be one of the most dangerous things around.
That mother going through post partem depession, could be influenced to commit suicide, or hurt her children, if someone had a strong enough remote influence on her mind. She would just get feed those thoughts daily, with more details, not being abel to control what she was thinking, and not knowing that someone else was influencing her thoughts. This could be true for guys and thoughts of rape, pedophelia, etc.
Mind influencers, and like their reading counterparts they could be very dangerous to society if used for bad. Ofcourse in a hostage crisis, a talent like this could end with a peaceful outcome. Johnny you don’t want to hurt those people, put down the gun Johnny, you get the idea.
Then there are those who could manipulate emotions, sad, happy, sexy, etc. If the emotions are forced onto another person, that would be just as bad as mind influencers. If the emotions were transfered like a reverse empathy, then this would be kind of neat. It would kind of be like the movie the crow, part one, where he gives back all the pain that was caused by those who hurt his girlfriend. You could give back love, passion, adoration, etc.
Again, I think that if a world of abilities do exist, they could be good on the one hand, but they could also be bad on another level. I also think much like the X-MEN most would not reveal these talents to the world, because they would end up feared in some cases, hunted in others, and or worst sought out and paraded and praised for their ability. There are psychics who do make a living off of such things, and that is neat, but i think most people would just keep it to themselves, or other loved ones who they thought they could trust to keep their secrets.
So that’s my opinion on PSI Wars. I do think that is an apt term, because for all we know, this could be going on right now. Did anyone see the move jumpers?
That would be a cool ability to have. Till next time.
I have been following up on the Britney Spears situation, so this post goes out to the people who know her and might actually be in a situation to assist her.
I don’t like to speculate about the lives of celebrities, but we are told Britney is all healed up right? She is back on stage singing provocative songs like F.U.C.K ME (If you seek Amy) and other numbers. Her body is back in shape and she is on tour. Things are fine right?
The problem is I don’t know that things are fine. Britney who fought for custody of her boys, even going so far as to have an armed standoff with the police to keep them with her gave up custody of the boys last year. Kevin Federline now has sole custody and Britney has visitation rights, sort of.
[quote]Spears currently has monitored, twice-a-week visitation with her boys, as well as one overnight-a-week.
She lost all visitation rights in January she was hospitalized at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.[/quote]
Twice a week supervised visitation. and one overnight a week, which I imagine is also supervised?
Britney does not have control of her own money. She is well enough to perform like a trained doll in front of the audience, but she is not well enough to have control of her money? Shouldn’t people be asking questions about this?
[quote]Britney Spears’ life under her dad’s conservatorship is like “prison,” a lawyer for her former manager, Sam Lutfi, charged today in a hearing at L.A. Superior Court.
John Anderson testified he was contacted by another lawyer, John Eardley, to represent Britney in her fight against the conservatorship (which gives Jamie Spears control over her personal and financial affairs). He also says Jamie’s control is causing the singer “emotional distress [that is ongoing] now.”[/quote]
I hate that picture of her. The look does not suit.
[quote]Jamie filed for a restraining order against both men earlier this year, claiming they had harassed Britney, 27.
The ruling follows evidence given by Jamie and Britney’s hairstylist and bodyguard, who all claimed the ‘Womanizer’ singer was scared of Lutfi.
Last month, Britney’s former boyfriend paparazzi photographer Adnan Ghalib was also given a three-year restraining order barring him from seeing the star.
So based on the word of her dad, and a hair dresser, Britney Spears who is 27 years old, almost 30 has no say in who can come near her, and she has no control of her money. Yet she is ok enough to be prancing around on stage like a blank doll?
This next bit I found really worrisome.
“[Britney] told me she wanted to get a hold of Sam,” said Christina, 25, whose brother had once been Spears’s manager. “She wanted him to help her find a lawyer, and wanted someone to get a prepaid cell phone to her. She was scared because her father was blackmailing her with visitation rights over her kids.”
Spears allegedly told Christina to meet her on the fifth floor gym of the Peninsula Hotel on Jan. 16. When Christina arrived, Spears was working out with her mother while a bodyguard stood nearby. But they rendezvoused in a sauna where Christina gave her a phone, saying it was from Sam and ex-boyfriend Adnan Ghalib, which Spears then hid in a locker. “She asked me, ‘Will Sam be able to help me?’” Christina added.
The phone, however, was later discovered by Spears’s security team and confiscated from her purse.
The next thing I found really worrisome is that he lawyer was being kept away from her. I had been keeping an eye on Britney, because he meltdown and the events around it, made me think she might not be crazy, but a targeted individual made to look crazy. The scary part is if it’s true, it means someone with the fame, fortune and celebrity of Britney could have this happen to her.
Remember at her low point she had the kids taken from her, her money, and she was locked away. Also those who might have been trying to help her, were kept away from her. What can someone under those conditions do? Yet she has millions of fans, and none of them are asking the questions, or putting together a free Britney site on facebook? At the very least Britney is a grown adult who’s life is being controlled by forces outside of her control, and those paying to see her parade on stage should ask themselves why? If she is well enough to perform like a trained doll why is she not well enough to be in charge of her own money and life? Why is her lawyer being kept from her?
Don’t forget that those bodyguards that her dad hired still control her movements. This should worry a lot of people, but it doesn’t. All those so called screaming and adoring fans, should be all over this and asking some real questions.
as ordered Britney Spears’ former manager and a lawyer to stay away from the pop singer for the next three years.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aviva Bobb issued her ruling Tuesday after hearing testimony and arguments in recent weeks from the men and lawyers for Spears’ father, Jamie.
Her lawyer now has to stay away from her? Was the judge paid off? Does he know something that we don’t know?
[quote]Lawyers for Lutfi and Eardley promised to appeal the ruling, saying the lengthy hearing didn’t prove the singer suffered substantial emotional distress as a result of the men’s actions.
Lutfi’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, said evidence instead pointed to Spears asking his client for help.
“Never before in the history of the world has a restraining order been issued against someone who merely responded to cries for help,” Freedman said. [/quote]
I find it odd as well. Why can’t the lawyer challenge the fact that someone is in control of Britney’s life other than Britney?
[quote]Freedman said the conservatorship was misusing a statute meant for the elderly or severely disabled adults to protect a singer who is currently on an international concert tour.
The singer remains on a tour promoting her most recent album, “Circus.” She did not appear during hearings on the petitions, despite repeated requests by Lutfi and Eardley’s lawyers to have the singer testify.
Her life remains closely managed by her father, who can restrict her contact with outsiders and controls her access to a cell phone. [/quote]
Britney not asked or rather not allowed to testify? Does this seem shady to anyone else? Yet all these people claim to be her fans. They all go to her shows, but they don’t question the fact that she might be in serious trouble and being held captive by her Dad?
She according to sources, does not have access to cellphones, the bodyguards watch her every move. She can be on tour, but not in control of her own money? Any nobody questions this?
The singer has sent a barrage of text messages to Adnan begging him to help her get out of living under the control of her father.
But Ghalib, 36, is unable to reply because he has been ordered by a judge not to communicate with Britney for three years.
A source said: “She keeps sneaking messages to Adnan begging him to help her win back her freedom.
“She says she is lonely and misses being able to date the men she chooses. She feels trapped.
“She has been begging him to meet her and help her come up with a plan to get out of her dad’s conservatorship.
“Some messages have got back to her via her hairdressers and style team – but Adnan cannot contact her otherwise he will face jail.”
Add to this the fact that Adnan is in some bizarre trouble. As I was following up on his story, it sounds like he is being provoked. Now he is being threatened with deportation, for allegedly hitting or driving at one of those people who sound like they were helping to keep him away from Britney.
[quote]Ghalib, 36, is charged with assault with a deadly weapon, hit-and-run and battery.
The charges relate to an incident on 11 February in Los Angeles when a court official tried to serve him with a restraining order to stay away from Britney.
The restraining order was issued by the singer’s father, Jamie Spears, who has taken control of her affairs.
Ghalib allegedly tried to run over the court official – the charge of use of a deadly weapon relates to his car.
The photographer moved to Birmingham from Afghanistan with his family when he was five years old, and he works in the US.[/quote]
I also find it interesting that her new album is called blackout.
If Britney is in trouble, then it sounds like they are trying to remove the people from her life who could help her. If her dad really is keeping her a virtual prisoner, and it’s possible, then we need to hear from Britney, but it does not sound like she is free to state her case.
Under the circumstances what can she do? I don’t think it’s up to her, I think it’s up to the so called fans who claim to love her, and who buy the tickets to her show, to ask questions. To wonder why lawyers are being kept away from her, lawyers who claim she is a virtual prisoner to her dads control. Why she can be on some tour, but not have full access to the money she is making from those tours. Why a 27 year old woman, has to have bodyguards choosen by her dad wherever she goes. I think her fans have to ask if Adnan or even Lufti could be telling the truth and if so what does that mean for Britney, who they claim to love so much.
[quote]Yesterday we reported that a woman who is believed to be Britney left a voice message with her lawyer, asking what happens to her custody agreement if her father’s conservatorship is ended. Expect Britney Spears to start fighting back like never before in the coming months. And expect it to be a “circus” of its very own. [/quote]
[quote]Hi my name’s Britney Spears. I called you earlier. I’m calling again because I just wanted to make sure that during the process of eliminating the conservatorship that my father has threatened me several times, you know, he’ll take my children away. I just want to be guaranteed that everything will be fine with the process of you guys taking care of everything that things will stay the same as far as my custodial time.
That’s it, bye.[/quote]
If that voicemail is Britney then as late as March she was asking for help. People seem to be just walking around in a maze. It is possible that she is in trouble, and if she is really asking for help, then her fans, so called fans could go a long way towards ensuring that there is enough light shone on the situation to help her get the assistance that she needs.
There is no denying that Britney made some bad choices on her own, but what’s ongoing now sounds very worrisome, and it would be good if her fans would look into it on her behalf.
[quote]“I think it’s too in control. If I wasn’t under the restraints I’m under, I’d feel so liberated. When I tell them the way I feel, it’s like they hear but they’re really not listening. If you do something wrong in your work, you can move on, but I’m having to pay for a long time. I never wanted to become one of those prisoner people. I always wanted to feel free.”
MTV’s For the Record airs Sunday, November 30, at 10 p.m.[/quote]
People you never want to see get back together again.
This post has very little to do with gang stalking it’s mostly just fluff.
I was on the Internet the other day and I saw a picture of Briney Spears and Justin Timberlake and the caption was something like back together again.
I was like what. So I read the article, and it was just about them appearing on stage together again, thanks to Madonna.
I was relieved, but then I thought about it. I mean would it be so bad if these two kids got back together again? I don’t know how I feel about this one, but there are couples out there that I never want to see get back together again.
My top favorites I have mentioned before, but I will recap.
Now had they lived in modern day times, Samson and Delilah. Never want to see these two together again. One minute he’s nice and normal killing lion’s and eating honey out of their carcasses, the next minute he’s building bombing philistines. What’s up with that?
(Please take this post in the humorous context that it’s meant to be taken in.)
Charles and Diana. Had she lived, I would not want to see these two get back together. Reading and watching bit’s of her biography, I was really saddened to see what this pretty princess went through in silence. I think some people just have a bad effect on other people. I think that relationship did not reflect well on either party and how could it, when there was a third party involved for most of their marriage.
I think seeing Charles now with Camilla, we see him truly acting the part of the prince for the person he really loves, and yes it clearly makes a difference.
I think just before she died, it was nice to watch Diana regain a bit of what she had lost during the Charles years, but they get my vote for the never getting back together list.
Who knows in another lifetime it might have worked out.
Britney Spears and K-Fed. Now I was never really a Britney fan, but this made me really sympathetic towards her. Sure it was uncool for her to take K-Fed from Shar in the first place, and I was say the head shaving, mental hospital thing kind of balanced out the karma, but I felt really bad for her.
I would not want to see Britney back in this relationship. Yeah I know they have kids, but I think the effect he had on her was pretty devastating.
It actually left him looking like the stable party out of the two, and the more fit parent. I saw a YouTube video which really opened up my eyes about the effect he had on her, and it was not good.
I think some people bring out the best in others, and some people because they don’t have anything to give, or they don’t have any value in the person, brings out the worst and bring them down to the lowest common denominator possible.
They also get my vote on the not getting back together list.
Whitney and Bobby. Again what can I say. Away from Bobby, Queen of pop, respectable, high class, the greatest love of all, on the bobby train, spiraling out of control, drugs, not singing, paternity suits, him cheating on her, not a good look.
This also left Bobby at times looking like the more stable of the two. I again think it’s a value issue. If you are around people that do not love you, or value you, I think this is the sort of effect that we start to see.
For these two getting back together. I am going to say hopefully not, not my idea of a fairytale ending.
Oh Ike and Tina. I don’t think I have to say anything else here.
The point is if you are around people who do not value you, eg. Gang Stalking parasitic elements on a daily basis, people who don’t care about you, who do not value you, who do not have he best intentions towards you, it can bring out the worst in you. It can send you spiraling out of control, and bring you down to the lowest common denominator. Many people exist in the world that are just like that. Emotional sappers as Mark M. Rich calls them. They literally feed on the energy of others.
Anyways it shows that people can go through some challenging situations and still come out of it ok. It takes a lot to turn your life around when you have been through a train wreck of a situation but it is possible.
Gang Stalking is no different, we can find ways to rise above what is happening to us. I am not saying it will be easy, or even 100% but you can rise above challenging situations. You have to. Things can bring you down, but then you have to fight you way back up and out of whatever is dragging you down.
It’s the challenge that we face everyday, some better than others. I do get some of the emails. It’s possible though. Take it apart one thing at a time. Find a work around, one thing at a time. If they are taking away your sleep, focus on finding a way to sleep. Then meet the other challenge, until you find a way to conquer what is happening. Go after one element at a time.
Anyways to situations that do have happy endings, if they are still out there, I wish them well. To those in the world that help others to get through challenges, or fight for those they care about to bring them back from challenging situations, light like that is needed and appreciated in the world.
- Above top secret
- Abu Ghraib
- Active denial
- Active Denial Weapons
- as the world turns
- Asain Male
- Asian Female
- Astral Plane
- Background records checks
- bad luck
- Black female
- Black Females
- Black Male
- black women
- Brain reading device
- Britney Spears
- brown coats
- Buffy The Vampire Slayer
- changing vibrations
- Citizen Informants
- Civilian Spies
- Community harassment
- community mobbing
- community policing
- concentration camps
- constitutional change
- Controlled society
- Covert investigations
- Cultural diversity and multiculturalism
- david icke
- devinci code
- domestic spying
- East Germany
- electromagnetic frequency
- Electronic harassment
- Emotional Vampires
- False Prophets
- files updated
- Gang Stalking
- government corruption
- GPS tracking
- Guantanamo Bay
- Health and Safety
- Heath Ledger
- High technology
- Honey Trap
- Indigo Ribbon
- Intimate Infiltarations
- Jeremy Blake
- Joan of Ark
- John Lennon
- Kilmeer Gill
- Lord Of The Rings
- Marian Fisher
- Mark M Rich
- Markus Wolf
- Martin Luther King Jr
- Meat production
- mental concentration camps
- metropolitan police
- militarized police force
- Mind Control
- Mind Reading
- Minority women
- Naomi Ebersole
- National Security Letters
- Neurolinguistic programing
- New World Order
- one handed signals
- Online Stalking
- Passive Aggressive Manipulative
- Personal Identifiers
- Police Abuse
- Police Corruption
- Police State
- Production Company
- psychological harassment
- Quantum Physics
- Record keeping
- records updated
- Red Squads
- Robot Sentient Project
- Rosa Parks
- School Shooting
- sexual harassment
- sign language
- Skin Heads
- Social Control
- Spy cameras
- spy satellites
- State target
- Stop snitching
- Targeted Individual
- The Matrix
- Theresa Duncan
- Third wave
- Thought Police
- Threat Assessment Teams
- time travel
- twilight zone
- violent persons registry
- Voice to skull
- walls of jericho
- whistle blower
- white female
- White Male
- workplace mobbing
- Young and the restless
- zero tollerance