Sept 11. An ode to faking it.

Sept 11.

This is a day about making make believe look real. A day about giving the situation at hand the look of reality and the spin that you want it to have.

Eg. Many people believe that Sept 11 happened. Where people differ is who was behind it? Did planes really hit and bring down the world trade center buildings and was the official version the real version?

For many who are familiar with documents such as Operation Northwoods it’s reason to question if the government of the United States once again planned and carried out terror on the American citizens.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

[quote]Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”.

This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government, namely Cuba.

The plan stated:

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.

Operation Northwoods was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and signed by then-Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, and sent to the Secretary of Defense.

Several other proposals were listed, including the real or simulated actions against various U.S military and civilian targets. Operation Northwoods was part of the U.S. government’s Cuban Project (Operation Mongoose) anti-Castro initiative. It was never officially accepted or executed.[/quote]

Also recently we saw in Spain a building made out of steel that burnt for 20 hours straight but still remained standing. An amazing structure proving the power of steel to withstand heat and melting.

http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-09-10/911-attack-reasons-towers.html/print?fullstory

[quote]In February 2005, the 32-storey Windsor Building in the financial district of Madrid, Spain was completely engulfed by flames for 20 consecutive hours. I repeat: 20 consecutive hours. The structure did not collapse. In fact, after the fire was finally extinguished, a huge construction crane was seen perched on the roof of the building as raw testimony to the practical indestructibility of steel as a construction material.[/quote]

We also when 911 happened saw building 7 fall, even though no planes had hit the building and some rightfully question why that happened?

We also saw hole in the pentagon, but many question if a plane did hit, where the wreckage of the plane was?

Also last but not least, if you are a terrorist crashing planes into a building then even if your dental records don’t last, your passports will. Even when steel buildings melt, your passports will survive,

Anyways Sept 11 an ode to faking it, and it proves you can make anything appear how you want it to be, and most will never question the official version.

Who you have slept with.

Now having watched soaps over the years, I have seen a few of these plots. Some really desperate attempts to make it seem like someone had slept with someone when they really had not, or the person had not been willing. Anything from fake pictures, fake video, fake witnesses.

Who could forget Sammie Brady drugging Austin her older sisters boyfriend to make it seem as if he had willingly slept with her when she had not. Yes Sammie turned out to be a case, but she did improve in time. (She improved in her scheming that is, but that’s another story.)

Watching Dorian Lord get a divorce from David. To get a divorce from David Dorian had to enlist her niece Blair Cramer to dress up as her double, and pretend to sleep with Dorian’s husband David, but at the last minute Dorian switched places with Blair and David none the wiser, cheated on his own wife, with his own wife.

A few fake pictures later, and the divorce was finalised. Now these plots are cute in soap operas, well not really, but in real life this is another thing that is often easily faked and never questioned, because people like to believe whatever they are told without question.

I think watching desperate characters pull off things like this in the soaps are cute, I have had opportunity in real life to watch people pull things off like this and it’s never cute. To lie and in some cases create and fake plots almost or more desperate and more harmful than things that I have seen on the soaps.

I think it shows some pretty twisted personalities. People who don’t care about ruining or slandering other people’s reputations just to make themselves feel better, and in today’s world it’s even easier than ever.

Faking Investigations.

I don’t mean that the investigations that targets are under are fake, but what is fake is what the state does to us. They make people think all sorts of things, and they make the lies look good. That’s what faking it is all about, making the lies look good and believable.

Most of us are not crazy, perverts, terrorists, extremists, etc, but that does not matter, it’s continuing to give the perception to the people, that is what matters.

Making them think that if they were not spying on each other the world would suddenly fall apart, creating that illusion, that fake need.

Going to extreme lengths to make targets look like a danger, be it having dozens of informants on their tail, making them look dangerous, etc.

I had no idea until recently the lengths they will go through to manipulate a situation to make a person look crazy or dangerous. This system is truly crazy and desperate, which equals dangerous. The asleep sheeple will believe what they are told in many cases, and it’s scary.

So this post is all about Faking it. The above three things are some of the top things I have come across. Now since I am lucky enough to be free, please feel free to add your comments about other things that people like to fake.

America does not torture?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/5395830/Abu-Ghraib-abuse-photos-show-rape.html

[quote]Abu Ghraib abuse photos ’show rape’
Photographs of alleged prisoner abuse which Barack Obama is attempting to censor include images of apparent rape and sexual abuse, it has emerged.
 
At least one picture shows an American soldier apparently raping a female prisoner while another is said to show a male translator raping a male detainee.[/quote]
This article is very important. The reason it’s important is in part because it shows what happened in Abu Ghraid and in part confirms what many of already knew about the allegations of rape. There have been allegations of rape for men, women, and children. Some sites a few years back showed video of rapes, though some videos may have been false, many others are believed to have been real. This has been a disgusting and disgraceful time in American history and it’s a time I am sure many would like to forget and sweep under the rug, but if you do that, doesn’t that make you just as monstrous as Germany when they tried to cover up a lot of the Atrocities after WWII? They lied about a lot of what had happened and tried to cover it up.

I watched Obama stand before a group of Congress and declare that America does not torture.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N24444553.htm

[quote]
“Living our values doesn’t make us weaker, it makes us safer and it makes us stronger. And that is why I can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture,” Obama said.
[/quote]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r23oHpgMJg

I watched them stand up and clap in regards to this speech. I think most people like and respect Obama, but to say that just hit me. When I saw the speech I was thinking does he mean right this moment as he is saying it? Does he mean they have never tortured? I couldn’t help but think about all the Targeted Individuals men, women and children that were getting burnt in their homes on a daily basis. Who are being tortured in America and other nations. I could not help but think about what I knew about the prison Camps Abu Ghraid and Guantanamo Bay. About the pictures I had seen and some of the things that had gone on their, but here was this President, someone who America listens to and I think trusts, saying that America does not torture. How do you reconcile that? I know most countries would rather keep their dark deeds hidden, it’s the nature of the beast. It took many years for them to even admit to and then finally apologize for other dark times in American history such as the Tuskegee experiments that they conducted on Black men in the south, but eventually they did apologise.

Living your values makes safer and stronger, but apparently those values involve living in a state of denial and I don’t see how that can make anyone stronger. I think it would make you far stronger to step up to the plate as a nation admit fully what had happened, no holds barred and then apologise for it, and then let the nation start the healing process. Saying that there will be no torture under your administration does not change the past, and failing the victims, and not letting their abuse and tortures be known, still hurts and I daresay tortures them on a psychological level, the same way not dealing with slavery affected the America psyche for years down the line.

Germany is in many ways just now starting to recover from their Hitler time and have pride and love again for what Germany was, I just saw and article about that and I think it’s good, because they have finally dealt with and acknowledged some of what happened during that time period. What would the world be like in America now if people denied Slavery happened or said that it was not that bad? Well many Americans are still psychologically grappling with the legacy that left behind and when people try to brush it under the carpet, some get upset and offended, well is denying or not fully confronting the events of the last several years any better? Isn’t it just as offensive to deny the extent to which torture happened? To try to brush it under the carpet?

I think America needs to heal for what happened, but I don’t think America will heal by underplaying and denying what when on, just like slavery or any of your other dark past, you have to find a way as a nation to step up to the plate, take ownership and acknowledge what happened,  then apologize and only then can you truly start to heal as a nation.

Most would like to forget what happened, but I don’t think that will make you stronger or better in the long run, it’s not a healing or a healthy mentality to have. After 9-11 you felt hurt, violated and so you lashed back, even though Iraq was not the enemy, you did what you thought would make you feel safe, but in the end violations were committed, grievous violations and to heal, that has to at some point in the American psyche has to be dealt with.

Strange shoe throwing incident

Strange shoe throwing incident.

Instead of oops upside the head, or a spanking parents will now threaten their children with a shoe upside the head, in a strange shoe throwing incident that happened earlier today.

An Iraqi reporter named “Muntazer al-Zeidi” listening to G. Bush explaining how he had liberated the country, and put them in situation of independence, one where they would now be able to defend themselves, finally had it and snapped. He took of his shoe, and aimed one after the other at George Bush.

Saying this is for the widows and the orphans, you dog. It’s not clear which widows or orphans he was referring to, but it’s assumed it’s the almost 1 million widows and orphans of Iraq that have been left fatherless since the wars.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/07/8134
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42858

[quote]The Asharq al-Awsat Arab media channel estimated in late 2007 there were 2.3 million widows in Iraq. These include widows from the 1980-1988 war with Iran in which half a million men were killed, the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Iraq, and from ‘natural’ causes. The news outlet cited the Iraqiyat (Iraqi women) group as a source for their figure.

For a widow, all things are the same, dark.

“Being a widow means being dead in Iraq today,” a professor from Diyala University, speaking on condition of anonymity, told IPS. “This is because of the tremendous responsibilities cast upon her.”

The widows have become victims of the occupation, but also of social codes. Women are not supposed to commit mistakes, and when they do, their mistakes are rarely forgiven. Women are easily accused of doing ‘bad things’, regardless of proof.

Widowed women have a tough struggle on their hands, beyond the loss they have had to live through. They are not easily allowed to work, or even to carry out normal daily activities.

“When a woman breaks these rules, she loses the respect of others, or might be spoken of badly,” a local trader told IPS. “This is because much of rural Iraqi society is primitive and undereducated.” Like most others, the trader did not want his name used, for fear of retribution.

“Islam gives respectable freedom to the woman when she loses her husband,” a religious cleric told IPS. “But because of their ignorance, people place severe restrictions on the woman.”

Millions of lives have been shattered during the occupation. Two groups, Just Foreign Policy in the U.S. and the Opinion Business Research group in Britain estimate the total number of Iraqis who have died due to the occupation to be at least 1.2 million. [/quote]

 

Apparently throwing a shoe in Iraq is the greatest insult one can issue to another person.

Bush was able to duck and stay clear of the shoe and joked with reporters about it later on, but as you will see in the video below it was a very close call indeed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxCXBVwUeKk

The Truth

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/comments?type=story&id=6443988

What’s Behind Internet Conspiracy Empires? Apparently the truth. From the comments being posting on the article, it’s apparently the average person being sick and tired of the mainstream media feeding them the same information day in and day out that does not explain or answer some of the questions that they are seeking answers to. They are therefore seeking out alternative points of view. You know thinking outside of the box, asking questions and trying to find answers.

I won’t spend too much time on this article, the comments that were posted were fully vindicating. They were bright, intelligent, and they really were highly expressive. I was very impressed by the majority of commentators in that thread.

I was really surprised by the level of discontent with 9/11 truth. That issue is not going away. It’s worst now than it was before. Many of the comments were in regards to this issue. Many of the comments were also about the fact that many people no longer truth corporate controlled media and are looking for other alternatives. Other comments were rightfully concerned with Internet censorship, some felt that this might be a first step towards trying to target such websites, and labelling people as mentally ill for having different points of view. 

It was the intelligence of the posters that really impressed me, they were really bright and articulate, again I was highly impressed by the majority of them. People who are still willing to ask questions, and go out and seek other answers for themselves. These are the types of people who find my website, people that have not been satisfied with the mainstream explanations of what is happening and they are independent enough in many cases to be going out and looking for additional answers about what is happening to them.

As far as terming Gang Stalking World as a conspiracy website? I agree that what is happening to us is a conspiracy, but can we prove some of the targeting?

On the site you have documents that show that average normal everyday citizens can and do get followed around in the manner described. I have been able to show that for covert and overt surveillance, police do employ foot patrols. They do use signaling while on foot patrol. I have been able to show that Informants are being hired by the state, that we have become a surveillance culture, and that targeting the way in which we describe is possible.

The information on the website, utilizes information that any individual can go and access from various sources. Eg. Many recent documents on the website link to documents form the A.C.L.U. The documents show that average people will be having information recorded and placed into secret databases which the accused can not access. The information shows that 800,000 Terrorism Liaison Officers, will be in every town, state, city. They say that we are very close to becoming an Orwellian society. Is the A.C.L.U. a conspiracy website for posting this?

If someone goes to their website, or reads one of the various articles available on the Internet about surveillance and average people being monitored in the described manner, are these websites conspiracy sites? Should these websites worry that the information that they are putting out might cause someone to become paranoid?

Again if someone goes to a different website and reads about Workplace Mobbing, Cointelpro, Red Squads, The East German Stasi, etc should those websites be concerned that they might be influencing paranoid delusions? At the end of the day, those websites and mine are providing information, it is up to the individual to decide if the information is relevant and then go from there. The information on the Gang Stalking World website, is a collaboration of information that is readily available at many points of port around the Internet.

The article is an ok read, but the comments were the really interesting and relevant focus. It really showed that people have many concerns that are not being met or discussed by the mainstream media, the primary and reoccurring being 9/11 truth.

Shutting Down

http://www.i-cams.org/ICAMS1.pdf

I have been really busy reading reports like the one above, and working on some other projects. It’s a really worthwhile report if you have not read it.

One part of the report more or less talks about the fact that you don’t have to shut down all of society, just some parts of it, and then everyone else stats to fall in line and the fear spreads.

This is what was done with the war on drugs, and the war on terror. Interestingly enough with the war on drugs, the people fighting the drugs, were also the ones importing it. Also we all know there are many questions that have been left unanswered about the war on terror and if in fact this was an external threat that carried out the action.

I came across some news stories that really for once had me concerned, as to how far gone we really are as a society. I for once could really feel myself shutting down. See my Gang Stalking is not pleasant, but it doesn’t bother me. I just mean that I have learnt or become accustomed to living with many aspects of it, and it doesn’t bother me. What does bother me are some of the things that are happening in society that are being left unchecked. No one is there looking out for those balances. 

For years many of us have been reporting what we call Gang Stalking, which is basically Cointelpro like activities with a big dash of the former East Germany thrown in.

Our societies are becoming surveillance societies, with Informant forces that would make the Stasi jealous. Even after reporting this, getting the information out, there is not one responsible agency that is willing to do anything or to look into this. The United Nations still criticises countries like China for their actions, but are completely ignoring the fact that countries such as the UK, US and Canada, along with European countries are torturing citizens inside of their own homes, and are systemically driving many to suicide, falsely imprisoning, or institutionalizing many others. It’s a weird world when you look at it from this perspective, but that still does not bother me, I have gotten accustomed to this, and accept the world for the way it is, corrupt.

What did start to bother me are several news stories that I have seen. Alone they are not much, but together for me they are a real indicator that we are slowly starting to shut down as a society, and not just in one country.

Here are a few of them, and for the first time I really felt that I wanted to just close off, where I have not felt that way before. I realised that I could not let myself begin to feel this way, if Gang Stalking hasn’t shut me down, then I didn’t want these stories to. I had to dig into my reserve and just choose to remain open and not let the worry overcome me. I realised that the only way we can shut down as a society externally, is if we let ourselves do so internally, and I refuse to do this, I refuse to give into that fear and become a closed off person. Instead what I am choosing to do is to support some of the people in these stories, either just privately, or just by letting others know what’s happening, and speaking out when I see injustices. So here is a run down of some of the stories that made me really wake up and pay attention and for once really made me sad, but only for a little while.

 

Armed Guards in Churches.
 http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/11/06/church.security/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
[quote]In an era when terrorism threats and deadly shootings at schools and churches have made headlines, religious leaders are rethinking their security strategies. Last Saturday, a minister was fatally shot and another man wounded outside of a church in Kentucky where the men went to attend a funeral.[/quote]
So now in addition to walkie-talkies and security cameras we now have armed guards. The same trick worked for the schools and will eventually work for guns. I wonder who these people in these churches are praying to?

 

Student arrested for photocopying documents
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/may/31/highereducation.uk
[quote]
For more than a decade, Nottingham university felt
like the safest place in the world for Hicham Yezza as an undergraduate, doctoral student, campus activist and, most recently, employee. But two weeks ago his world caved in when he was arrested under the Terrorism Act.

The 30-year-old Algerian was detained by police for possessing a copy of the al-Qaida training manual that he had been given to print by a friend researching the terrorist group’s techniques for his MA.

University officials called in the police after a colleague noticed the document on his computer. Yezza and his friend, 22-year-old student Rizwaan Sabir, were held for six days despite Sabir’s tutors giving statements within two days that the document was directly relevant to his research.[/quote]
Campus activist for peace, probably had more to do with this than what he downloaded for his research.

 

[quote]Yezza said his situation highlighted a growing fear on campuses. “It’s a very, very worrying trend that needs to be opposed, this mindset that views everything with extreme suspicion. That installs some sort of ‘play it safe’ mentality, which is the very opposite of intellectual endeavour.

“No intellectual progress takes place without a sense of curiosity, without a sense of going beyond what we know already, beyond the established facts and notions and truths; that’s how scientific and intellectual revolutions have been achieved.”[/quote]
The only thing that get’s achieved in these climates are unjust witch hunts, but until people get bored of it, this will continue. The way to stop this, stop living in fear. Refuse to live in fear, refuse to give into this, it’s the only way to stop this, and it begins with you, each and every individual person, that’s the only way to stop this.
[quote]Yezza’s supporters and academics, many of them attending the University and College Union conference in Manchester this week, are now talking of the pressure they face to become “police informers” on their students, part of the government’s “preventive agenda” which has seen universities and colleges provided with guidance on how to spot and tackle extremism.[/quote]

I keep trying to drill this into your head. We have turned into a society of snitches. It’s horrible. We looked down on East Germany for this a decade and half ago, and now we are doing the same thing.

 

[quote]Gavin Reid, a member of the UCU national executive committee from Leeds University, said people were scared to do research and speak out. “Self-censorship is coming,” he said. “People are more suspicious of colleagues and students. People are scared even to look at the link [for the training manual in the Nottingham case].”[/quote]

And this is what they want. To control us and to scare us. They don’t need to arrest or terrorise everyone, just a few key people, then the rest start to shut down, but if we each play our part and refuse to shut down, refuse to be scared, we can overcome this.

 

[quote]“Hicham was a very prominent member of student political society. That says something about the potential implications of being politically active on campus in a time when a culture of fear merges with draconian terror legislation.

“It’s a question of intellectual freedom, not just academic freedom. What does this say about people’s right to inform themselves about issues of public concern?[/quote]
That’s right, he is an activist, and what does that say about society? What is happening within the Gang Stalking community, is just as relevant to everyone else, the conditions that are allowing this to happen to us, are the same conditions that are allowing these things to happen to others. Think about it.

 

Family arrested for selling food.
http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php?ArticleID=4287
[quote]
Ohio authorities stormed a farm house in LaGange Monday, December 1, to execute a search warrant, holding the Jacqueline and John Stowers and their son and young grandchildren at gunpoint for nine hours.  During the raid the Ohio Department of Agriculture and police confiscated over ten thousand dollars worth of food, computers and cell phones.  The Stowers’ crime?  They run a private, members-only food co-op.

[/quote]
Wow that soon will be a crime worst than terrorism, food terrorist, those who try to sell food to the poor, that is truly horrible. I feel very bad for this family. The food they took also included the families food supply for the next year, from what I have read. It’s a horrible story and there can be no justification for doing this to a family, of course in a society such as this, anything can now become justified.

 

Australia to censor their Internet just like China
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24568137-2862,00.html

 

This should scare you. A so called democratic country shutting down, or rather censoring it’s Internet the same way China does? Do I need to say more?

[quote]AUSTRALIA will join China in implementing mandatory censoring of the Internet under plans put forward by the Federal Government.

he government has declared it will not let Internet users opt out of the proposed national Internet filter.

The plan was first created as a way to combat child pornography and adult content, but could be extended to include controversial websites on euthanasia or anorexia
[/quote]
For our own protection. This is the same crap they are trying to pull for identity theft and why they need more control. Normally the people scaring you have a hand in why you are being scared, remember there is often an objective to be achieved.

Now if one democratic country is willing to shut down, or rather censor their Internet the same way China does, what will stop the other so called democratic countries?

I know there are going to be protests in Australia, but this is an international problem, not just an Australian problem, what affects them could well affect the others.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a4f_1228731672

[quote]
A Queensland man has been charged for re-publishing on a video-sharing site a viral video of a man swinging a baby around like a rag doll.

The controversial three-minute video had already been published widely across the Internet and shown on More..American TV news shows. The clip can still be found online today.
Chris Illingworth, 60, a father of four from Maroochydore, thought he would share it with fellow users of Liveleak, a site similar to YouTube but focused on news and current events. In two years, he has uploaded hundreds of videos to Liveleak.

His home was raided on Sunday, November 30, by Queensland Police from Task Force Argos, which specialises in combating child pornography and child groomers.

He was charged with using the internet to access and publish child-abuse material and is scheduled to appear in court in Maroochydore on December 18.

It is understood that he had no involvement in the creation of the video, which cannot be published on this website for legal reasons.
[/quote]

I can’t even begin to describe the craziness of this story. Here are more details.

[quote]On Saturday, November 29, 2008, Biggles9’s home and office was raided by the Task Force Argos. They seized his computers for forensic inspection. He was arrested by armed officers while his neighbors watched, and was detained for 7 hours of interrogation with no lawyer present. He is being charged with accessing child abuse material, downloading child abuse material, and uploading child abuse material with the intent to distribute. He had to post $10,000 in bail, has to report to the police every two days, and has travel restrictions.

When the video was originally uploaded, the idea was to try to identify the man swinging the baby. Biggles9 worked with one of Liveleak’s founders (Hayden Hewitt), who in turn worked with the UK police, who in turn worked with Interpol, who traced the video’s origin to Russia (possibly a “circus family”). However, Biggles9’s IP address was also recovered and forwarded to the Australian federal authorities, who in turn forwarded it to Task Force Argos, who in turn arrested Biggles9.

Here’s Biggles9’s post about the incident: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ccd_1228081196
[/quote]

For this he is getting charged with accessing child abuse material. So every who saw this on the news, cause the video was shown on the news, also accessed child abuse material. Anyone who taped the news that day, also accessed child abuse material, and anyone who made a tape or dvd, and passed the new item on to their friend, family also is guilty of the same things. That’s the insanity of it all, but that’s what he has been charged with. Now in this case, he saw the video on YouTube or something and downloaded it, and uploaded it to liveleak. That’s all he did, and now he is being charged almost the same way actual criminals get charged.

Now about the video, apparently it’s an Eastern European father, apparently a circus family, so he’s apparently swinging the child by one arm, and legs, etc. Basically like a trapeze show, but the child s one or two, now you would not want to try this at home, but at the end of the video the child is laughing and smiling. I feel bad for the family if this is part of their culture, because obviously the police came looking for them as well, and the father in the video is probably getting a lot of slack, yet what if this is normal in his culture?

Anyways back to Biggles9, he did nothing that millions of Internet users do not do every day, and to go after him for this is wrong for those reasons. I mean based on this, these people could go after America’s funniest home videos, Steve Irwin when he was alive and he let the kids go near the crocodile, and anyone who uploaded a video of him letting his kids go near the crocodiles, that’s the insanity that we are dealing with. (Oh I didn’t think him letting the kids go near the croc was such a good idea, but that’s just me.)

 

Bus Beheading

Greyhound to screen passengers. You knew that this was coming. They had no reason to do this on buses, they wanted to after 9/11, but they needed a reason, and this gave them one. Interesting how that worked out.

http://www.globaltv.com/globaltv/national/story.html?id=1025521

[quote]
Greyhound Canada began introducing improved security measures Tuesday, beginning with terminals in Edmonton, Calgary and Winnipeg, the company said in a news release.

The company said all passengers will be screened for weapons with a hand-held magnetometer at major Greyhound bus terminals. The company is also now mandating all luggage be stowed underneath the bus, with some exceptions made for customers needing essential items, the release said.

[/quote]

For years they have been operational and this never happened, and now a beheading and there go your rights.
I could go on, but do you see the pattern? You will continue to see the pattern, and if you don’t question the mechanisms behind what is happening, you will not see the little pieces being moved around the board.

People really are sheep, scare them enough and they will do what you want, but just remember:

“Those willing to sacrifice essential liberty for a little security deserve neither freedom nor security”. Benjamin Franklin.

Yet the above scenario seems to work everytime. It’s such a simple formula, have an agenda you want to see implemented? Scare the people, and they will come clamoring to you to implement the agenda. It’s sad, but it’s worked everytime, and people continue to let it work, that is why we are where we are.
If we continue to live in fear, then that is all that we will have. They want us to be afraid, scared, sheeple, not thinking, or questioning. If we want to change this we have to refuse to live in fear, at the end of the day, it’s up to us how we choose to live. If you choose to shut down, you will help others around you to shut down, if you choose to remain open, that is the best thing that you can do.

Speaking of trends, we seem to be moving onto get them sensitized to fears about biological warfare, and worries about that. I guess the programing for fear of terrorists is not working as well as it use to?
“First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out–
    because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out–
    because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out–
    because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out–
    because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me–
    and there was no one left to speak out for me.”

Martin Niemoeller

Keep the faith

I recently came across two articles that took me for a bit of a surprise.

I admit I was a little bit taken aback when I came across the articles. The articles much like the mind games article that came out over a year ago focus on people with delusions, but this one tries to take no prisoners, it tries to go for the juggler, however I would like to see it fail and be right back where it belongs.

It’s coming out around the time of the Mark M. Rich book, which I still think is well written and should be used to further what we are saying about what is happening to us. http://www.TheHIddenEvil.com

These articles are good because the Targeted Individual community needs to be aware of some of the obstacles we are going to be facing as we try bring more awareness about what is happening to us, to a main stream audience.

Here is an excerpt from the first article.

[quote]
Psychosis in the 21st century looks something like this: You think your every move is being filmed for a reality television show starring you, and that everyone in your life is an actor.

Or you think you are under intense surveillance by an army of spies, whom you refer to as the “www people,” as in the World Wide Web, and they wiretap your furniture and appliances.

Or else you refuse to drink water because you fear that another cup drawn from your faucet will, once and for all, deplete the world’s water supply.

Those thoughts are from three case studies of what psychiatrists interested in the intersection of mental illness, culture and society are calling, respectively, Truman Show delusion, Internet delusion and climate change delusion; all of them a window, through madness, into the modern world.
[/quote]
Just like the other article this in many ways is also a mind game.  Now don’t get me wrong, I am sure there are people in society that might be delusional etc, but we are a community of people who know what we are talking about. We not only know what we are talking about, but in the last two years, a great deal of research has come out to show the structures of these programs that are in place. Targets have started to expose this system of control and conformity and in many ways it’s doing what it has always done, it’s fighting back.

Just like any other time period the only way to fight back is with truth and light. For the few victories that we get, they will try to limit our success, we must not let them. The information is there, we just have to gather it and try to use it to our advantage. The more information we can gather about the programs that are in place the better we are.

Here are just a few things we have learnt over the last two years.

1.
We have learnt that the FBI has issued over thousands of Nation Security Letters to many individuals in society. We have learnt that of the thousands of National Security Letters issued, everyone received a gag order. They could not say anything without the penalty of going to jail. We now know that out of all those people that received those letters, those organisations, those entities that we are suppose to trust in many cases. Only a few fought back. To be correct I know of only three cases. One was the Internet Archive, the other was another online library, and the third was an ISP provider who won the case to not have to give up the information, but still has a life long gag order, and can not say anything to friends, family, co-workers etc.

http://epic.org/privacy/nsl/default.html

[quote]NSL Statistics
The Inspector General’s report detailed the FBI’s use of NSLs from 2003 to 2005. All of the below statistics were taken from this report.

Total number of NSL requests from 2000 (prior to passage of the Patriot Act): about 8,500.
Total number of NSL requests from 2003-2005 (after passage of the Patriot Act): 143,074.
2003: 39,346
2004: 56,507
2005: 47,221
Percentage of NSL requests generated from investigations of U.S. Persons:
2003: about 39%
2004: about 51%
2005: about 53%
Type of investigation connected to NSL requests (2003 through 2005):

Counterterrorism: 73.6%
Counterintelligence: 26%
Foreign Cyber Investigations: 0.4% [/quote]
Why have more people not tried to speak up and challenged the system? If everyone took the same steps that these three companies did, we would all be a lot further along.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/22/AR2007032201882.html

[quote]
Living under the gag order has been stressful and surreal. Under the threat of criminal prosecution, I must hide all aspects of my involvement in the case — including the mere fact that I received an NSL — from my colleagues, my family and my friends. When I meet with my attorneys I cannot tell my girlfriend where I am going or where I have been. I hide any papers related to the case in a place where she will not look. When clients and friends ask me whether I am the one challenging the constitutionality of the NSL statute, I have no choice but to look them in the eye and lie.
[/quote]
Similar types of gag orders may well be used with our friends, family, co-workers, and others to keep hushed.

In my research I have been lucky to have a couple people here and there share with me the fact that they can not say anything. I appreciate that. The way the companies are being silenced, many in society are being silenced the same way and don’t know how to fight back, they don’t have the resources to fight back, or really don’t want to against a system this powerful.Seeing what is happening to us, can leave people feeling complacent and fearful.

This is where we can help, they can not talk about what is happening in many cases, but we can. By researching and learning more, we can shine a light on what is happening. I have had a few people express their gratitude for this, but it’s not enough, I feel that we can do more. I believe we can each do our part, but we should realise our struggle is just as great as any other time period. The only difference is the face of our opposition. In the past the oppression was clearly laid out for us, this time it’s not as clear, but just as destructive.

With the National Security Letters the main thing that I have learnt is that if you do nothing, you will get nothing, if you fight back you might still not win, but at least you have a chance. These people fought back and they won.
http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/05/06

[quote]
San Francisco – The FBI has withdrawn an unconstitutional national security letter (NSL) issued to the Internet Archive after a legal challenge from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). As the result of a settlement agreement, the FBI withdrew the NSL and agreed to the unsealing of the case, finally allowing the Archive’s founder to speak out for the first time about his battle against the record demand.
[/quote]

 

2.
We have learnt a great deal about Community Oriented Policing programs. Many countries around the world not foster and host such programs. The community themselves identify problems that they see in the community, depending on what is happening, data is collected, sometimes a covert or overt investigation takes place, and then a solution is often presented.

http://www.amazon.ca/Community-Oriented-Policing-Systemic-Approach/dp/0130141100

[quote]
There is little doubt that this paradigm in policing has captured the attention of both citizen and police, mayors and police chiefs, state government and national government officials, and has worked its way into becoming a household name.
[/quote]
[quote]
A key debate within the central understanding of the systemic approach to policing is whether community-oriented policing is a philosophy or a program.
[/quote]

[quote]a systemic approach to policing with the paradigm of instilling and fostering a sense of community, within a geographical neighborhood, to improve the quality of life. It achieves this through the decentralization of the police and the implementation of a synthesis of three key components: (1) strategic-oriented policing—the redistribution of traditional police resources; (2) neighborhood-oriented policing—the .interaction of
police and all community members to reduce crime and the fear of crime through indigenous proactive programs; and (3) problem-oriented policing-a concerted effort to resolve the causes of crime rather than the symptoms.
[/quote]

These programs have been adapted in many countries around the globe. The structure and functionality of these programs are a potential match for some of what we have experienced.
3.
We have in the last two years learnt that it’s become a common workplace practice to silence outspoken workers, whistle blowers, etc with the threat of a psychiatric evaluations if they don’t stop being outspoken, often about legitimate issues.

http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

[quote]
On October 5, 1998, Norm Crosty sent a letter to the labor relationsdepartment at his plant. Crosty, for thirteen years an electrician at Ford Motor Company’s Wixom, Michigan, assembly plant, complained that he could not do his job because so many of his bosses were taking the necessary equipment out of the plant to work on their homes or personal businesses.

The next day, the plant director of human resources invoked a Ford program for combating workplace violence to bar Crosty from the factory and ordered him to see a company-paid psychiatrist or lose his job.

A little more than fourteen months later, and 725 miles away, officials at Emory University cited a similar concern about violence to justify using armed guards to escort Dr. James Murtagh off university property when Dr. R. Wayne Alexander, chairman of the department of medicine at Emory, ordered him to see a company-selected psychiatrist or lose his job. Six weeks earlier, Murtagh, a professor of pulmonology at Emory, had filed a false claims suit against the university, alleging that it had misspent millions of dollars in federal grant money. He claimed the university diverted money from research grants in order to pay for salaries and trips for administrators and some staff. The specific allegations were sealed by order of the federal judge.

Crosty and Murtagh don’t know each other. It is unlikely their worlds would ever intersect, but they have at least one thing in common. They both are victims of an increasingly popular employer weapon against whistleblowers: the psychiatric reprisal.
[/quote]
4.
we have learnt or at least I have learnt, that these are citizen informants doing this. I have on a personal level interacted with a few of them. I have personally provided dozens of articles about local programs, how they function, how they operate. I have spoken to at least two law enforcement officers who confirmed to me that this does exist, I have spoken to many others who deny any knowledge.

 

5.
Mark on his website has a great deal of information about the structure of these types of programs. It matches the structures that I had also found in my research. Federal programs with local appendages, and then communities taking part. Various countries around the world are adapting these models.
Recently I have started to investigate fusion centers. Fusion Centers are multi level government centers with several appendages, that will be in every American city, if they are not already.

http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/privacy/fusion_update_20080729.pdf

[quote]
If the federal government announced it was creating a new domestic intelligence agency made up of
over 800,000 operatives dispersed throughout every American city and town, filing reports on even the
most common everyday behaviors, Americans would revolt. Yet this is exactly what the Bush administration
is trying to do with its little-noticed National Strategy for Information Sharing, which establishes
state, local and regional “fusion centers” as a primary mechanism for the collection and dissemination
of domestic intelligence.
[/quote]
6.
I have also been researching the training of TLO’s. Terrorism Liaison Officers. Some great articles came out recently about these fire fighters, police officers, civil servants, Corporate Executives that are being trained to be the eyes and ears of the state. The information mentioned that they will be communicating in code.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU-xsQ3Xepw

http://www.denverpost.com/commented/ci_9732641

[quote]We’re simply providing information on crime-related issues or suspicious circumstances,” said Denver police Lt. Tony Lopez, commander of Denver’s intelligence unit and one of 181 individual TLOs deployed across Colorado.

“We don’t snoop into private citizens’ lives. We aren’t living in a communist state.”

Local watchdogs

Among recent activities the Colorado contingent detailed:

• Thefts of copper that could be used in bomb-making.

• Civilians impersonating police officers and stopping vehicles — of particular concern with the pending Democratic National Convention in Denver.

• Graffiti showing a man holding an AK-47 rifle.

• Men filming the Dillon dam that holds Denver’s water.

• Overheard threats.

• Widespread thefts of up to 20 propane gas tanks.
[/quote]

For me personally I have had a lot of things hitting closer to home. I really feel at this stage a lot of the information gathered is hitting closer to home than I had anticipated.

I feel this way, because there have been several recent attempts to take my website offline. There was one domain name stolen which was recovered, but the domain name was purposely targeted, and a domain name company appears to have possibly been complacent with the attempt to keep the domain name.

I have had someone that I believe was deliberately compromised.

I do begin to realise that it’s the same dirty tricks. We are a generation that is learning how the state operates. We are learning this again because as we have learnt in the last two years, when I say we, I mean you my audience who read my blogs. (I hope you do read my blog.) We have learnt that they have wiped out the leaders that have come before, they have run them into the ground, destroyed their lives, hopes dreams. Many of us are now experiencing the same opposition.

Unlike what has gone before, our opposition has primarily been silent and covert, with many of the people, the agencies, organisations, political leaders we should be able to trust unavailable. We have ourselves and we have a community that is making some headway, more than I realised. That’s good, but that also means the bag of dirty tricks are going to come out, and we do have to find a way to mount up some kind of resistance, or we can choose to just sit back and let them continue to do this.

For many of us, we have lost family, friends, jobs, careers, etc. Let’s not to the best of our abilities let them take anything else from us.

I do fully believe these people want us to feel that we are powerless. That we have to take this, that there is nothing better for us, but I don’t believe that. I do believe as ever they are worried that the truth will come to the surface. I believe it can, but more targets do need to step up to the plate. Use the resources that are there. Use the websites that speak the truth, the books, the articles. Do what we have been doing, but more of it.

We really do hang around ourselves a lot, we need to go out into the mainstream arenas and be able to have credible conversations. If you don’t know how to converse, start by posting a same quote from a site that you trust, or feel comfortable using. Start by asking if anyone has heard of Gang Stalking, Targeted Individuals?
Have a main stream discussion about Fusion Centers, community policing, community action, etc. Talking amongst ourselves is great, but they own and control the media and we have the Internet as our primary resource but not necessarily for that much longer.

We need to take the battle not just online, but offline to a degree. Even if it’s to hand out flyer’s saying, what is Gang Stalking? What are Targeted Individuals? Direct people to the websites, while we still can. Mark’s book is out. You can use that as an offline resource, but we must do what we can, for as long as we can, and as quick as we can.

Keep the faith, pray, meditate, fortify yourselves. We are up against some big odds, a corrupt society that is moving towards a very big agenda. We must do what we can.

Down with the system

People keep writing in and asking the same questions, so I keep giving the same answers.

To understand what is going on start with a system. Then give it little appendages of control, and go from there.

Different sectors of society are then controlled in different ways.

Some are just controlled via socialization, and when they get out of line they are socially annexed. this works very well, and in some societies in the past, this was used instead of jail. A person who had committed a wrong, would be ostracized, and this would be punishment enough. The same with shaming a person. In our modern day society we still have similar same mechanisms in place.

[b]Schools[/b]
Children are socialised from an early age to confirm, and to be controlled. They are taught that they are free, and that we live in a democratic society, but what they are really learning in most cases, is how to be good citizens, follow peer pressure, and how not to question the system. Most will go through life, believing in these ideals and freedoms, because it’s what they have been conditioned to think.

[b]Work[/b]
Workplaces are the same, more control and conformity. Those who can pretend to get along well, or who fit in line with the structure the most usually rise to the top and come through the system the best. (This is not always the case, but most often.) Another social structure where conformity is key.

[b]Religion[/b]
Same thing, and most people are aware of how structured religion can be. How people can be socially annexed, and how regulated the views, values and beliefs are suppose to be. We think we have made great strides separating church from the state, but the control and conformity the church loses, the state picks up the slack.

[b]Television Programing[/b]
They call it programing for a reason, and most of us are plugged into it from the time we are born, until we die. We trust it, and it often helps to tell us what our views values and beliefs should be. Most people do not realise the impact this has on them, but it has a great deal of impact with molding what people think, believe, and even how they act.
When subtle social conformity fails what happens next? That is what we are seeing now. When these forms of subtle social conformity are not enough to do the job, then other forms of control are put into place. This is not the case in every instance, but it’s the case in too many instance.
[b]Bullying[/b]
Tim Fields, God rest his soul. He was instrumental in not only being bullied himself, but in realising that bullying was a phenomenon that was responsible for thousands of deaths every year, from grade school, right on up into the workplace. Bullying unlike mobbing, usually involves a single bully, who goes after one person at a time. The person is usually seen to be the best, brightest, or the person who really stands out.

One thing that Tim began to look into before his death, and before his website went offline was obstruction.

(Yes I just checked and bullyingonline.org seems to no longer be available in the conventional sense of the word. Just one more resource gone.)

He realised that there was a great deal of obstruction ongoing.

[quote]Many targets of bullying report that they seem to be obstructed every step of the way in their pursuit of justice. The management refuse to investigate, or use an untrained investigator, or whitewash the case. The union refuses to help, or initially shows interest but suddenly changes sides. The solicitor initially shows interest but then starts acting in a manner which suggests they have the other side’s interests at heart rather than yours.

The employer’s lawyers apply for, and obtain, adjournment after adjournment, then obtain a pre-hearing review which the tribunal chairman handles in favour of the employer. In the tribunal, favour is shown to the respondent (employer) and you get the impression that the verdict has been decided in advance. Your solicitor, the respondent’s lawyers and the tribunal chairman seem to know more about your case than you think they should.

After the tribunal you’re left with no option but to privately sue the employer, the union, and your solicitor, and appeal the tribunal decision, but by this time you have no job, no income, your savings are gone, so is your health, maybe your marriage too, and there’s no prospect of ever being employed again, especially in the professions.

Sound familiar? If so, you might be surprised to realise how often this happens. Mostly it’s in cases from the education sector, although it may happen in any public sector case, for example the NHS. Occasionally, but less often, it happens in private sector cases, and in rare cases from the voluntary sector.

Although there’s never any substantive proof, it seems that all the parties arrayed against you have been colluding in secret. The question is, what allegiance binds these individuals together, and where could they meet such that the normal rules of confidentiality do not apply? What fraternal obligation places their duty to support and protect each other above the moral, ethical and legal obligations by which the rest of us are bound?

Employers, unions, law firms, and employees of the justice system are part of society, and every group, professional or otherwise, contains a few poor performers and rotten apples. This ranges from inexperience through ineptitude and incompetence to collusion and corruption.
[/quote]
[b]Mobbing[/b]
Almost the same thing as bullying, except it involves a group of individuals. Workplace mobbing could be called or seen as the cousin to community gang stalking. The target is the focus of gossip, rumours, slander, most times they will never fully hear what is being said about them. They are provoked, made to seem as if they are bad at their jobs, usually fired, or given menial tasks until they quit. When leaving, many who do have the resources to sue the system are met with the same obstacles listed above in the bullying section. Many targets of mobbing will kill themselves, or be unable to function or work again. Often they can not find jobs in their industries.

Mobbing was first documented in Europe, the name came from the activity that a noted professor watched crows attacking one bird. Just repeatedly pecking at it, one by one.

Definition of mobbing from http://www.mobbing.ca

[quote]Mobbing can be understood as the stressor to beat all stressors. It is an impassioned, collective campaign by co-workers to exclude, punish, and humiliate a targeted worker. Initiated most often by a person in a position of power or influence, mobbing is a desperate urge to crush and eliminate the target. The urge travels through the workplace like a virus, infecting one person after another. The target comes to be viewed as absolutely abhorrent, with no redeeming qualities, outside the circle of acceptance and respectability, deserving only of contempt. As the campaign proceeds, a steadily larger range of hostile ploys and communications comes to be seen as legitimate.
[/quote]

I am an old pro at this one by now, and though I can’t say it get’s easier to deal with, at least knowing what you are up against helps a great deal.
[b]Gang Stalking[/b]

[quote]Gang Stalking on a macro level is a systemic form of control, which seeks to control and destroy every aspect of a targets life, often without leaving a trace.
[/quote]

Just like with workplace mobbing, this is the community version of the same thing. Many targets of this will be falsely institutionalised, jailed, commit suicide, or go missing. Socially, financially ruined and annexed. Many
never realise what is happening to them till it’s too
late.

Gang Stalking is not only very similar to workplace mobbing, it’s also very close to Cointelpro, which never stopped, and according to some sources is very much alive and well in it’s modern day form.

http://www.Cointelpro2.com
[b]Cointelpro[/b]
http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/cointel.htm

COINTELPRO is an acronym for a series of FBI counterintelligence programs designed to neutralize political dissidents. Although covert operations have been employed throughout FBI history.

It was not just designed to neutralize political dissidence, it was designed to stop it in all it’s forms, and inceptions. This program was designed to stop these groups from ever having a chance to reach any potential. The way this program stopped these groups is by stopping the people behind these groups. Political assassinations, dirty tricks, breaking up people’s relationships, leaving them jobless, making their neighbours spy on them, putting them in jail on trumped up charges, sending them on the run, disruption, disinformation, squashing dissidence in all it’s form.

It destroyed and ruined, just about every civil rights movement that could actually make a real difference, and made sure that any future leaders, were squashed before they had a chance to rise and become the next Messiah that could electrify the masses.

Here is to you J. Edgar. Hoover, somewhere out there, I do hope the Karma is still smiling on you.

[b]The Buzzsaw[/b]

This is what can cut through you if you are a journalist and you step out of line. However this is what can happen to you in any profession, if you step out of line. It just has different variations.

[quote]Borjesson describes “the buzzsaw” as “what can rip through you when you try to investigate or expose anything this country’s large institutions — be they corporate or government — want to keep under wraps. The system fights back with official lies, disinformation, and stonewalling.

Your phone starts acting funny. Strange people call you at strange hours to give you strange information. The FBI calls you. Your car is broken into and the thief takes your computer and your reporter’s notebook and leaves everything else behind … The sense of fear and paranoia is, at times, overwhelming.” [/quote]

[quote]When they speak out, buzzsaw victims are usually treated as paranoid conspiracy theorists.[/quote]

[quote]Borjesson was subject to similar attempts at character assassination by her former peers[/quote]

[quote][b]There’s something of an X-Files feel to a lot of these stories, though not in the way that condescending guardians of official truth think. Rather, their surreal feeling comes from the first-person experiences of people finding the institutions they’ve served all their lives suddenly turning on them. As Borjesson writes, “Walk into the buzzsaw and you’ll cut right to this layer of reality. You will feel a deep sense of loss and betrayal. A shocking shift in paradigm. Anyone who hasn’t experienced it will call you crazy. Those who don’t know the truth, or are covering it up, will call you a conspiracy nut.” [/b]

In fact, that’s just what a lot of these writers have been called. Once a journalist has been tossed out of the inner circle, anything they write can be smeared as sour grapes or mere ranting. The media has already branded them unreliable, so their charges are extremely unlikely to be taken seriously.
[/quote]

[quote]Indeed, some of the writers in Buzzsaw say that, before their own experiences, they were among the scoffers. Webb writes, “If we had met five years ago, you wouldn’t have found a more staunch defender of the newspaper industry than me … I was winning awards, getting raises, lecturing college classes, appearing on TV shows, and judging journalism contests. So how could I possibly agree with people like Noam Chomsky and Ben Bagdikian, who were claiming the system didn’t work, that it was steered by powerful special interests and corporations, and existed to protect the power elite?”[/quote]

Yes and before gang stalking and electronic harassment, I would have laughed people silly out of the forums. Until it happens, unless it happens, it’s hard to believe. Even as it happens it’s hard to believe, because it requires suspending beliefs and realising that all of society is like this, and this is a systemic form of control to keep the masses in line, and in check with the status quo.
[b]Whistle blowers, activist, dissidents[/b]

[b]Dissident Peter duesburg.[/b]

After a stunning 20 year career, with just about every reward and recognition under the sun. He realised that the findings on the theory HIV leads to AIDS might have some loop holes. He went from a stunning career being the darling of the field to doing without grant money. He dared to question the stutus quo. The problem with this of course if there is validity to what he is saying, then they should be discussing this.

I understand that in it’s 20 year run, the dissident movement and questioning the HIV/AIDs theory is now right up there with Holocaust denial? When we have seen science be wrong about so many things in the past, to the detriment of so many, do we really want to rule out all possibilities until all the facts are in? Of course we do, because the system say so.

I remember when everyone mocked the guy who thought that stomach ulcers were caused by a bacteria? http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/hpylori/#3
After years of confirmation that stress was what caused all ulcers.

Pellagra was thought to be from bacteria in Maize, but it was in fact a vitamin b deficiency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pellagra

History has taught us on these and so many other occasions to keep an open mind, but we never do.

(Great upto date, insight full article on HIV.)

http://www.jpands.org/vol12no4/bauer.pdf
[b]Whistle Blower Lana Vandenberghe[/b]

After finding out the truth about the London tube shooting. This brave whistle blower tried to get the truth out to the world, so that an innocent man, would not have his reputation killed and destroyed, like he had been. For her efforts she paid a price.

[quote]Lana Vandenberghe, who worked for the Independent Police Complaints Commission, said that ten officers broke down her front door in a dawn raid. She was placed in a cell without food or access to a lawyer for eight hours by bullying officers who told her that she would go to prison.

Despite the ordeal, Ms Vandenberghe, who lost her home, her job as an administration secretary and was treated for depression after being arrested, said that she would do it all again to expose the deliberate police “cover up”.[/quote]

She is just one of thousands, here and abroad, who have paid the price for doing what they know to be right. Exposing corruption, drugs that were bad for the public, health care scams, unsafe air travel, etc. Many of them are offered no gratitude, many will loose their jobs, and be ostracised. The system does not reward you for going against the status quo, and the fate of whistle-blowers is just one more example of this.
[b]Activists Judi Bari[/a]

Earth first activist. Tried to save the forest. Had the FBI bomb her car, tried to blame her for it. She would be paralysed, go through this awful trial to try to figure out what had happened and prove her innocence. She had a small child during this time to try to take care of. She would later die, but she did win her case against the state.

Again her story is just one of many. There are hundreds of activist, dissidents that are dealt with in the same way. The people who have tried to expose 9/11. Many have met with unfortunate circumstances or death.

The activist that tried to expose the CIA bringing drugs into ethnic minority communities in the States, again the same fate.

Regular citizens are controlled by being socially ostracized on one end of the scale, all the way to being gang stalking on the opposite end of the spectrum.

It is one system of control.

I also keep getting the same questions and comments

Q: For each target to be followed around it would cost $20 million per year per target?

A: Considering they did the same thing during Cointelpro, and that Russia and East Germany were able to pull this off by using civilian spies, why would our society be any less capable?

Q: Wouldn’t it have to be a conspiracy, that the whole world was in on?

A: The whole world does not have to be in on it, but a large enough sector of society must be aware of, and taking part in these activities, for this to happen.

Q: Are these people just paranoid?
A: Hey anything is possible, and I would have thought the same thing myself, but after doing the research for a year and half. Witnessing things that seem impossible, and yes, out of an X-files episode, or one of those stepford wives movies, then I to go with what I am seeing, experiencing, and what the corresponding, documented evidence is showing me. I am not the only person to come to these conclusions or to experience similar events.

Read some of these books if you have additional questions.

1. Ward Churchill, Jim Vander Wall “Cointelpro Papers”

       2. Protectors of Privilege: Red Squads and Police Repression in Urban America
       3. Anna Funder “Stasiland”
       4. Gloria Naylor. “1996″
       5. Victor Santoro  “GASLIGHTING How To Drive Your Enemies Crazy “
       6. Anthony Brina “Suburban Spies”
       7. Stephen Knight “The Brotherhood”
       8. Alex Constantine “The Covert War Against Rock”
       9. Jim Redden  “Snitch Culture”
       10. Frank Donner “The Age of surveillance”
       11. Kristina Borjesson “Into the Buzzsaw”

Q: Can this change?

A: Anything can change, but only if you want it to. Only with time. Only with a strong will and a resilient nature, and even then, the results are not guaranteed.

To the system. I leave it to it’s fate, and let the Karma work it’s will accordingly.

Snitch culture

 I found this book about a year ago, when I just started trying to figure out what gang stalking was. I had researched snitching, cause I figured they had something to do with what was happening, it would be a long time before I realised they had everything to do with what is happenig, and that gang stalkers and snitches were essentially the same thing.

It would be some time before I figured out about the controlled society as well, and how far back this culture of snitching goes.

I got the site back up, and I am blogging as quickly as I can, cause who knows how long my computer will behave.

I had to fix the site, someone had defaced it, while I was offline. They had removed the profiles, with stories of individuals, the page that I have about snitches, interestingly enough, and a couple of others, like how to cope. Very specific and very telling.

Anyways, I have not had a chance to read the book, but I think the article, explains what I have been trying to explain over the last year about the snitches. The information, (the truth) is out there, it’s just a matter of finding it. Ofcourse I stubbled across this a year ago, and had no idea that it was relavant to what I was researching, or what was happening to me. Now looking back, I don’t see how I could have missed it, but I did.

You can be living in one reality and even when it get’s strange, still miss a lot of the significance of it all, which I am sure I still am, but I can only handle so much at once. Everything in good time.

Anyhow enjoy the article, and if you get the chance to, pick up the book, or the other book the article recommends by Frank Donner. He is the one who also wrote Red Squads.

http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/article/id730/pg1/index.html
   

What is making us NOT fight back?

I came across this most excellent post, and after following all the requirments below, felt embolded to reprint it. I think it’s worth a blog post.
Attribution.

Author: Dock6
Affiliation: AboveTopSecret.com
Title: What is making us NOT fight back?
Link: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread202159/pg1#pid2123735
posted on 5-4-2006 @ 09:33 AM  
 

Excellent post ! I think many people are asking themselves the same questions as those you’ve posed.

You’re right: sixty years ago this situation could never have evolved. A hundred a sixty years ago, no politician or group of politicians would have dared attempt the repressive control of populations as is now occurring.

But maybe I’m wrong. Pearl Harbour for example — the radar technicians were stood down, apparently, in order the Japanese could launch their fatal attacks. Did those radar technicians come forward? Not even ONE of them? I don’t think we can accept that not one of them, or even six of them, did not examine their conscience and decide they must reveal what they knew.

So how come we only learned about the betrayal that was Pearl Harbour, a few years ago? How come for all those decades, we believed that the Japanese had somehow achieved the impossible by bombing Pearl Harbour? How come we didn’t ask ourselves: ‘ Hey ! How the hell did those Japs get so CLOSE to Pearl without being detected???? What the hell were the radar guys doing …. sleeping? ‘

But we didn’t ask, did we? And no one told us. Instead, we watched all the movies and tv shows and books …. and we bought their story: we suspended our critical faculties and simply accepted what we were told and shown.

How come the media of the day didn’t ask: ‘ Hey! How the hell did it happen? What were the radar guys doing?’. And it’s interesting, when you think of it, that not ONE of those radar guys’ stories made it into the mainstream media of the day? How come the betrayal of Pearl Harbour was not exposed, way back then?

So, the media has been manipulating us a long time, without our even realising it, back then.

Another factor is the ‘one in twenty’ theory. Apparently, administrators of jails and POW camps, etc., *find* the one in twenty, and isolate them. The one in twenty is the one who initiates action; who motivates the remaining 19; who acts as natural leader. The one in twenty is smarter, more capable, more independently minded than the other 19. The other 19 can be restrained with minimum effort; they are sheep-like, relatively obdedient; are ‘followers’. Get rid of the one in twenty, and your job of controlling the other 19 is easy. Perhaps repressive regimes are actively seeking the ‘ones in twenty’ within our midst. They might find them at protest rallies; in internet forums; etc. They are the first to be picked off. Perhaps they’ve *already* been picked off, which might account for all us sheepies, just sitting here in confusion and dismay, waiting for our ‘leaders’ to come and show us what to do to save ourselves ?

Then there’s testosterone. It’s what makes men fiesty; willing to take on aggressors and repressors. Knock out the testosterone and men become malleable: peaceable; hesitant; unsure; docile. It’s been shown that men can be (and are being?) turned into a form of psuedo-female, via chemicals contained in foods, drinks, food and drink wrappings and containers, etc.

Another means of putting men out of balance and unsure of their role and capabilities, is to kick their confidence around on daily basis. We’ve been advised (by Makow amongst others) that the Women’s Lib movement was a pivotal phase in the Zionist destruction of western societies. Women AND men were the dupes. Men were told they had to change, had to accept a less dominant role at home, work, socially, etc. So men grew used to repressing their inherent maleness for fear of giving unintended offence, or of inviting criticism, of being considered ‘unacceptable’ generally. This created confusion in men; lack of confidence and feelings of shame about who and what they were.

Another tool in the Zionist agenda was to destroy the family unit. Men traditionally were heads of families; were the breadwinners. They gained their sense of identity from this. By promoting Women’s Lib and encouraging women to leave the home for work, men no longer felt like the head of anything. Yet every ship needs a captain, and there can only be ONE captain. A family is a ship; one leak and it’s disaster.

The family unit was further undermined through drugs, pornography, easily-obtained divorce, credit, consumerism and government dictates that forced parents to surrender their children to dumbed-down education systems that encouraged children to challenge their parents at the same time it forbade parents to discipline their children effectively. Governments imposed their versions of ’sex education’ upon children and insist that children recognise same-gender sexuality and marriage, etc. Parents have had to sit back and watch their children being exposed to inordinate emphasis on sexuality: at school, in the media, etc. Parents are ‘punished’ if they object to what they clearly feel is an unhealthy agenda aimed at their children, by the government for which they pay.

People have been told they ‘must not’ object to government dictates; ‘must not’ voice their opinions about issues of race, immigration, education, government decisions, corruption, and a dozen other issues.

People are afraid to open their mouths. They feel their opinions are ‘wrong’ or punishable. The media reports the punitive actions of governments against those in society who speak out. The media is engaged in a campaign of terror, on behalf of governments. People see black-outfitted monsters, seemingly seven feet tall, their faces hidden behind black visors, their shoulders padded to immense proportions, wearing six inch soles, weilding a variety of terrifying weapons against old age pensions staging a peaceful protest. People are terrified. What if *they* were beaten by these government sanctioned goons, simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? What would happen to their family if they were incarcerated without charge or evidence?

So, for quite some time now, people have been manipulated by governments who push and pull, push and pull. The message people are being given is brutality simple: keep your mouths shut and do as your told and you might survive what we have in store for you. What we may or may not have in store for you is a secret. However, if you DO dare to open your mouth and voice any objection to this govenment, we can promise you that you will suffer a fate worse than death. Now go to work, shut your mouths, see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing , think nothing, pay your taxes, obey us, believe everything we tell you even though we will vary our tune daily …. and you and your family might make it through until next week. You have no opinon, no rights and probably no future. So shut up and enjoy what little you have today.

No, governments and corporations couldn’t have gotten away with this sixty years ago. But sixty years ago, people had just fought the fight of their lives, WW2. They’d survived the ravages of the Great Depression. Then along came the golden years; the 50’s and 60’s and formica and refrigerators and air-conditioning and new cars and homes and light, romantic Doris Day/Rock Hudson comedies and extended leisure time. Golf and tennis and music lessons were no longer just the province of the wealthy. People grew used to a new, more leisurely, more materialistically enriched lifestyle. They grew used to peace, to governments who handled the big-issues, which resulted in ‘more’ of the good stuff for much of the population. Gone for most, were the days of not enough food and money. Everything seemed wonderful and getting better by the day. People forgot ‘hardship’ as their parents had known it. And movies and the new wonders of tv introduced people to ‘escapism’; encouraged them to dream often unrealistic ambitions for themselves and their children.

In other words, people lost much of their ‘edge’. They grew complacent to a degree. They wanted the fun stuff of life and left government deal with the boring issues. People surrendered their independence in return for what seemed like the good life. And then they took the good life for granted.

Problem is, when you hand responsibility for yourself to someone else, or to a group of others, you need to realise that those others are going to do what’s in *their* interests, not yours.

Governments/politicians are NOT the way they’re portrayed in all those movies and tv shows. Sure, they have the nice suits and the grey-flecked hair and good teeth. Their voices are often rich and deep and comforting, but so are a lot of radio announcers’ voices … and a lot of those are maniacs. It’s not HOW they speak, but what they say that matters. But most important of all is what they neglect to say, which is actually what they secretly MEAN.

TV and movies have manipulated us to accept that if a politician LOOKS nice, then he/she is ‘good’. We’ve come to believe that if a politician went to a ‘good’ school; if he is handsome, if he lives in an exclusive neighbourhood, if he socialises with celebrities … then he is someone we should allow to control our lives. Well, Madonna is a celebrity and Tom Cruise has nice teeth and hair … but would you let them determine your children’s fate? Would you allow them to poison your water and food and strip you of employment and your previously nice neighbourhood? Arnold Swartzenegger was dynamic in Terminator and funny as hell in Twins and Kindergarten Cop …… but does that really qualify him to control the lives of millions? Does it?

At the moment, we’re waiting like frightened sheep, hoping the days of Fonzie and Brady Bunch mentality will return. We don’t like these wars and unemployment and fear. We want it all to stop. We want to be able to go back to enjoying that sense of childhood we knew even ten years ago. We want someone to step up and fix things so that we can feel better. And according to various so-called ‘conspiracy theories’, we’re exactly where ‘they’ want us to be, right on schedule. According to the same theories, ‘they’ will soon introduce the anti-Christ … who will look exactly the way we’ve been conditioned to expect our ‘leaders’ to look: tall, tanned, silver tipped hair, nice suit and teeth and a voice like honey, which will reassure us that all we have to do is follow him and we’ll all be able to sit back and relax and enjoy again …….. forever, in hell.

It all comes down, as Bob Dylan said a long time ago, to doing it yourself: ‘ If you want someone to trust … trust yourself ‘ — ‘ If you want someone to love — love yourself’ — ‘ If you want someone to believe — believe yourself’.

There will always be one in twenty. But they’re having a rough time right now, like the female lawyer they’re trying to lock up for 106 years for doing nothing more than exposing corruption in her locality. SHE is one of the ones in twenty. You have a choice: support and defend those Ones in Twenty now, so that they can fix your world up for you. Or sit back on your couch and watch re-runs of Everyone Loves Raymond and let them take those Ones in Twenty away, leaving you and yours helpless and doomed. But people are going to have to make a decision and live with it, because this crap isn’t going to go away or get better without a hell of a lot of work and risk.

One of the best bits of advice available at this time, is to do as the ancient Scots did, when they were poised at the edge of a life and death battle. They recited their genealogy, then called to God, saying: ‘God — give me the courage of my ancestors ! ‘ Doing the same might just be what puts us on the right path and gives us the courage to continue.

Ship Shape Spies.

Big improvement on the S.S. Suburban Spies.
Ok there has been some kind of massive over haul with the way things are being run, now they actually look like someone owns them. As we all know someone does own them, the government and they are snitching and spying for the state, so the least the state could do was dress them up and trick them out appropriately.

Ok I am not sure for the reason for the changes, I am guessing, because they were making themselves so obvious that they could be seen from space, hello.

Also I was noticing this poser guy, that is the only word for him. He was dressed in like over 30ish rap gear, which so did not suit him, and then he was all like covering his mouth and doing nothing else, expecting people to signal back, it was so obvious he was being a poser. Even I was like, I don’t know you. I saw him again this week, and his posing was doing way better, he was sitting back and just observing them. That’s the way you learn. I don’t know what he was thinking. He still had the horrible over 30ish rap looking outfit. It just so doesn’t work. Not sure what his deal is.
 
Anyways, changes that I have noticed.

Better postures, now they actually look like a suburban spy force, rather than people who crawled out of bed with nothing better to do, and decided to collect government spy-fare cheques. Or do their delinquent state duties.
Outfits. I have not seen any really tragic outfits that needed mentioning. Again I haven’t seen anything amazing this week, but again, at least they look like someone owns them now.

Signalling. For all you targets out there, at least the ones who live in my city. This week the spy force totally went underground with the signalling. NO more crazy, outlandish on watch eye signals.
They have actually opened up a dictionary and learnt the word subtlety. Thank God. It was so bad, their signalling. I didn’t want to totally diss them at the time, but big improvement. Eg. This Asian guy on the train, did the pretending to be sleeping thing, but he’s really good at it. He only opens his eyes to see who else has come on board and to give directional signals. He was really good at what he was doing, same with the woman who was his cohort. I would say he was the conductor of the moment on that train car. They were doing this really cool back to back and face to face thing, which really works, good for them, bad for us targets. Of course I had to have some fun with it, but he really did a good job.

So they really are being way more subtle, if you want to see them in action, you are going to have to do what the poser guy is doing and just observe them. They have dramatically improved. So targets be more alert.

They also now are better at coordinating the train arrival with getting everyone in position on the platform, so that is way better. Can I ask anyone, why they still feel a need to come and sit with me? Do I look lonely to you? Really. Do your spy thing, but stay away from me. You still get the odd few who have not opened the dictionary to learn the word subtlety.

So today at lunch it was funny. Cause it was Easter Sunday right the area that I lunch in, the washrooms were closed right, so as they tried to do their usual pretending to go to the bathroom, it was funny to watch spy after spy, slam into the closed door. The looks on their faces.

Then now when they walk past me to stalk me at lunch, instead of walking over to try to see what I am eating and doing, they actually are trying to be pretending to be not spying, but it’s still so obvious to me. After spending the last nine months of my life openly being stalked by them, tortured by them, and having my life invaded to such a unspeakable violating degree, it’s not likely that I would forget them.

Our society is in trouble though. If the numbers that I am seeing on the train are any indication we are in such trouble. I mean seriously, on the train I am seeing well over 85% taking part in this. That is being modest. Now I don’t know if I am seeing more of a concentration of this cause I am a target, but remember what I use to do is I would go from car to car to check, and I would walk from the front to the back or whatever, and each car was the same.

I can tell you I work in an small office of under 50 and everyone but me is taking part in this. Now I don’t know if they have been inducted since I started working there, but I don’t think so. They have been put on alert however. Yeah I’m nutty. Sure.

I can also tell you, I have seen this in other things, eg. People are so use to the signalling and signing that they do it on camera in some cases. I don’t want to point out the examples, because things go missing too easily in cyberspace. However I don’t think that the numbers I am seeing taking part in this are wrong.

It’s like a cult. The people that are in it, can’t see that anything is wrong, or that they are a part of something bad. Many of them, not all of them, because some people don’t want to go along with this. Like the ones who died trying to leave this, or became socially annexed. Remember this is running from top to bottom in our society. It has been for some time. More than likely decades in one form or another. I spent years on the planet, and I had no idea. I spent eight years or more, being a target of this, and I had no idea, till last summer.

From what I have read and researched, I fully believe that this is what is causing a lot of the workplace mobbing and suicides that we are seeing. It’s also causing people like me who don’t figure this out in time to become jobless, homeless, forced suicides, mass slaughter, institutionalisation, or jail.

I don’t see how this is getting stopped. Eg. A month or so back, I saw a guy on the train, he was like mentally ill or something, it was kind of like obvious. They were watching him right. That was then. Today I saw him again. He looked more together, but more importantly, he was signalling. Now I wasn’t absolutely sure at first, but I am pretty sure, more importantly, when he got off the train, no spotters were following him that I could see. That means he is like one of them now. That’s creepy.

Did anyone see those alien movies where they take over the planet, like body snatchers or something? Just where a few people see the truth and realise what is going on, and there is no way to get the truth out. I can not be the first person to have noticed this, but our media can’t or won’t talk about it. The agencies that should be protecting us are not, or they are owned or influenced by the people that we are trying to seek protection from. I won’t even go over my CHRC (Canadian Human Rights Commission) complaint, that is going nowhere fast. I faxed it so many times, and each time, they either didn’t get it, or oh there is now a page missing, or oh we think there were two files opened. We can’t use everything in the complaint. Just like all the other people before me have found. It’s just irritating. Where is justice to be found?

Anyways if you do have a spy force that is going to take over the planet someday, at least they won’t all look like tragic fashion victims, who can’t coordinate simple signalling, or who don’t know the meaning of subtlety. On the other hand, the planet is going to be taken over by a spy force, the people controlling the people. I never understood this, mental slavery. It’s the worst kind, when you don’t know that you are bound. There are no bonds so many do not know that they are bound. The ones that do, they can’t get free. It’s like finding out too late that you married into the mob, or a cult or an abusive person with the wrong connections. You find that you can’t leave.

The things is if they could find a way to pull it together, before the whole world is snitching they could maybe get out of this, but they don’t. Like I use to wonder why the slaves did not ban together and just rush those slave masters and get free. It’s cause slavery is more than physical bonds. It’s mental. It’s like you have an elephant right. As a baby, what they do is they chain it with a really strong chain, well it tries to get free right, like any sane thinking person or creature would try to do, well it can’t cause it’s only little right. Well as it grows, it can totally get itself free if it wanted to, cause it grows strong, but even if they use a rope to tie the elephant with, it won’t try to escape, because it’s learnt that it can’t. It’s a total myth, but the elephant has been bound mentally as well as physically, and even though it could easily now throw off the physical bonds, it can’t throw off the mental bonds.

It’s the same for people. You get them when they are young enough or naive enough and you enslave them, physically or even just mentally and then after awhile even if they could get free they stop trying, they think they can’t. But it’s a myth, yet so many can’t get their minds around it, and so the system stays in place. It’s really bad, because over here we are taught how democratic we are and how free we are, and it’s a real wake up call, to realise that this is going on in society, and with such numbers of people, how could they all be taken in like this? I know over here we are really polite and stuff, and if the government asked, most of us would try to help out, cause that’s the kind of people we are, and many are not seeing the dark side of this. They either don’t know the truth or just don’t care. Just like Germany. I mean that whole thing, must have given them back such a sense of community, belongingness and togetherness, that they just over looked the fact that they were sending their neighbours the Jews off to death or concentration camps. What lies did they tell themselves to get by? Or did they just have a completely separate reality? I don’t really know, I can’t try to really exhume that part of history, and dissect it, but I think what we are coming upon is very close and similar.

So how are people going to see the truth? I didn’t. I know this signalling crap has been going on since I was in college, and I am sure even before them, but I just could not have wrapped my mind around this. I mean we are taught that only the Russians and Chinese and Germans spied on their citizens and had them being citizen spies. We were taught that we were just not like that, but that was a lie. We were exactly like that too. It was just a lie, but I bought it, hook line and sinker, like so many others in society. Which also makes me wonder what else we were lied to about? When you start reading about history and things that happened, things that never made the history books, you see the same patterns of repression, and the same periods in history. Many of them passed and sanity came back once more, and ofcourse we can all hope that this is all one more such time, but what seems to be happening seems to be on a much wider scale, and I am not sure there will be a period of sanity again.

I grow hopeful when I think of people like Rosie O’Donnell and saying the truth no matter what it’s going to cost her. It’s funny America is suppose to be free speech and stuff, but I see death threats to Rosie, and all these other hateful, and character assassination messages and they are so unnecessary. I mean she has a right to ask questions, questions that some people want answers to. I mean if the US government can come up with Operation Northwoods, the sister plan of 9/11, then why not 9/11? The US government has in the past, made plans to mass murder it’s citizens with terrorist actions and then blame it on others. Hijacking of planes, dead people in many cities, if they planned it once, why not a second time? It’s like the wife who finds out that her husband once planned to have her killed, in a skiing accident so that he could get his hands on her inheritance. Then 10 years later she gets killed in a skiing accident, and he get’s his hands on her inheritance, but everyone is going, he would never do that. Yet they have the proof that he would do that, cause he planned it before. Anyways I am not going to fault people for wanting to think well of their government, but just wake up and have a slightly opened mind. It will break your heart, and destroy you if it’s true, but so will living with lies in time.

I guess that is also true with the suburban spies, some have seen the truth and the truth has set them free in some ways, but it’s probably making them miserable in others. Simply put, ignorance is bliss. I am seeing the dark side of this, thank God. If I wasn’t I might think it was cool, or suave to be a Suburban Spy, these people get to play at this, and I have to fight for my survival. Well really we all do, cause the truth is not very pretty, and I feel bad for the ones who finally start to understand what God they are truly serving.